QR=3, RS =8, PT=8 QP=x solve for x

The tangent plane to the equation z = 4x³ + 3xy³ − 2 at the point (-2, 1, 40) can be found by calculating the partial derivatives and evaluating them at the given point.

To find the tangent plane, we need to calculate the partial derivatives of the given equation with respect to x and y. Taking the partial derivative of z with respect to x, we get dz/dx = 12x² + 3y³. Similarly, taking the partial derivative of z with respect to y, we get dz/dy = 9xy².

Next, we evaluate these partial derivatives at the point (-2, 1, 40). Plugging in these values into the derivatives, we have dz/dx = 12(-2)² + 3(1)³ = 48 + 3 = 51 and dz/dy = 9(-2)(1)² = -18.

Now, using the equation of a plane, which is given by z - z₀ = (dz/dx)(x - x₀) + (dz/dy)(y - y₀), where (x₀, y₀, z₀) is the given point, we substitute the values: 40 - 40 = 51(x - (-2)) - 18(y - 1).

Simplifying the equation, we have 0 = 51x + 18y - 51(2) + 18. Further simplification gives us the equation of the tangent plane as 51x + 18y - 123 = 0. This is the equation of the tangent plane to the given equation at the point (-2, 1, 40).

Learn more about tangent plane here:

https://brainly.com/question/31433124

#SPJ11

The region inside the curve r = 2a cos(theta) and outside the curve x² + y² = 2a²B can be visualized as follows:

The curve r = 2a cos(theta) represents a cardioid with the center at the origin (0,0) and a radius of 2a.

The curve x² + y² = 2a²B represents a circle with the center at the origin (0,0) and a radius of √(2a²B).

The region we are interested in is the area between these two curves.

To find the area of this region, we can integrate the difference between the two curves over the appropriate range of theta.

The limits of integration for theta depend on the number of lobes of the cardioid. The cardioid has one lobe when 0 ≤ theta ≤ 2π, and two lobes when 0 ≤ theta ≤ π.

Assuming we have one lobe, the area A can be calculated as follows:

[tex]A = \frac{1}{2} \int_{0}^{2\pi} (2a \cos(\theta))^2 - (2a^2 B) \, d\theta[/tex]

Simplifying the expression:

[tex]A = \frac{1}{2} \int_{0}^{2\pi} (4a^2 \cos^2(\theta) - 2a^2B) \, d\theta\\= 2a^2 \int_{0}^{2\pi} (\cos^2(\theta) - B) \, d\theta\\= 2a^2 \int_{0}^{2\pi} \left( \frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{2} \cos(2\theta) - B \right) \, d\theta\\= 2a^2 \left[ \frac{\theta}{2} + \frac{1}{4} \sin(2\theta) - B\theta \right]_{0}^{2\pi}\\= a^2 (2\pi - 4\pi B)[/tex]

Therefore, the area of the region inside the curve r = 2a cos(theta) and outside the curve x² + y² = 2a²B is a² (2π - 4πB).

To know more about area of the region visit:

https://brainly.com/question/32362619

#SPJ11

Prevalence of heart disease at the end of 7 years in this population:

The prevalence of heart disease at the end of 7 years can be calculated by summing the number of females who developed heart disease at 7 years and the number of females who already had heart disease at the beginning of the observation period, and dividing it by the total population.

Prevalence at 7 years = (Number of females with heart disease at 7 years + Number of females with heart disease at the beginning of the observation period) / Total population

Prevalence at 7 years = (75 + 10) / 750

Prevalence at 7 years = 85 / 750

Prevalence at 7 years = 0.1133 or 11.33%

Cumulative incidence of heart disease in this population:

The cumulative incidence of heart disease can be calculated by dividing the number of new cases of heart disease over the observation period by the total population.

Cumulative incidence = (Number of new cases of heart disease) / Total population

Cumulative incidence = (75 + 50) / 750

Cumulative incidence = 125 / 750

Cumulative incidence = 0.1667 or 16.67%

Incidence density/incidence rate of heart disease in this population:

The incidence density or incidence rate of heart disease can be calculated by dividing the number of new cases of heart disease by the person-time at risk. Person-time at risk is the sum of the time each individual was under observation.

Incidence rate = (Number of new cases of heart disease) / Person-time at risk

In this case, we are not provided with the person-time at risk, so we cannot calculate the incidence density or incidence rate.

Which measure (cumulative incidence or incidence density/incidence rate) will be most appropriate for interpreting findings? Why?

The cumulative incidence is more appropriate for interpreting findings in this case. Cumulative incidence provides the proportion or percentage of individuals who developed the disease within a specific time period (in this case, over the 25-year observation period).

It gives a measure of the disease burden and helps understand the overall risk of developing the disease in the population.

To determine if the incidence of legionnaire's disease is higher in Boston than Albuquerque, we need to consider the population size of each city. Comparing the number of cases alone does not provide a fair comparison since the population sizes are different.

To determine the incidence rate, we need to know the population at risk in each city. Without information about the population size and the person-time at risk, we cannot accurately calculate the incidence rate.

Therefore, we cannot conclude whether the incidence of legionnaire's disease is higher in Boston than Albuquerque based solely on the number of cases reported.

Additional information about the population sizes and person-time at risk would be necessary to make a valid comparison of the incidence rates between the two cities.

To know more about Prevalence refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/30539295#

#SPJ11

The differential equation y' = y + 4x² with initial condition y(0) = 28 can be solved using integrating factors. The solution is y = (4/3)x³ + 27e^x - x - 1.

To solve the given differential equation, we first write it in the standard form: y' - y = 4x². The integrating factor for this equation is e^(-∫1dx) = e^(-x), where ∫1dx represents the integral of 1 with respect to x. Multiplying the entire equation by the integrating factor, we get e^(-x)y' - e^(-x)y = 4x²e^(-x).

Now, we recognize that the left side of the equation is the derivative of the product (e^(-x)y) with respect to x. By applying the product rule, we differentiate e^(-x)y with respect to x and equate it to the right side of the equation: (e^(-x)y)' = 4x²e^(-x). Integrating both sides with respect to x, we obtain e^(-x)y = ∫4x²e^(-x)dx.

Solving the integral on the right side using integration by parts, we get e^(-x)y = -4x²e^(-x) - 8xe^(-x) - 8e^(-x) + C, where C is the constant of integration. Dividing both sides by e^(-x), we find y = -4x² - 8x - 8 + Ce^x.

Applying the initial condition y(0) = 28, we substitute x = 0 and y = 28 into the solution equation to find the value of the constant C. Solving for C, we get C = 36. Therefore, the final solution to the differential equation is y = (4/3)x³ + 27e^x - x - 1.

Learn more about differential equation here:

https://brainly.com/question/25731911

#SPJ11

The present value of the second option is $3,531.95.

(a) The future value of payments of $300 at the end of each month for 12 months can be calculated using the formula;FV = PMT [((1+r)n - 1)/r](1+r)Where PMT is the payment, r is the monthly interest rate and n is the number of months. Here,PMT = $300r = 2.5%/12 = 0.002083333n = 12FV = $3,668.19

Therefore, the future value of payments of $300 at the end of each month for 12 months is $3,668.19.

(b) In order to determine which option Jane should choose, we need to compare the present values of the two options. The present value of the $3500 bonus now is simply $3500.

To find the present value of the second option, we can use the formula;

PV = FV/(1+r)n

Where FV is the future value of the payments, r is the monthly interest rate and n is the number of months.

Here,FV = $3,668.19r = 2.5%/12 = 0.002083333n = 12PV = $3,531.95

Therefore, the present value of the second option is $3,531.95.

Since $3,531.95 is less than $3500, Jane should choose the $3500 bonus now.

Know more about the present value

https://brainly.com/question/30390056

#SPJ11

The probability of getting a 1 with the blue die and an even number with the red die is 1/12

The probability that the sum of the dots after rolling the blue and red dice is 4 is 5/6

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

The sample space of a die is

{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6}

Using the above as a guide, we have the following:

P(Blue = 1) = 1/6

P(Red = Even) = 1/2

So, we have

P = 1/6 * 1/2

Evaluate

P = 1/12

Next, we have

P(Sum greater than 4) = 30/36

So, we have

P(Sum greater than 4) = 5/6

Read more abot probability at

brainly.com/question/31649379

#SPJ4

The approximate values of f'(1.5) using the forward difference formula and the central difference formula are approximately 68.99 and 265.45, respectively.

To approximate the value of f'(1.5) using difference formulas, we can use the forward difference formula and the central difference formula. Let's calculate these approximations:

Forward Difference Formula ([tex]h = 10^{-k},[/tex] where k = 1):

Using the forward difference formula, we have:

f'(1.5) ≈ (f(1.5 + h) - f(1.5)) / h

For k = 1, h = [tex]10^{-1}[/tex] = 0.1:

f'(1.5) ≈ (f(1.5 + 0.1) - f(1.5)) / 0.1

≈ (f(1.6) - f(1.5)) / 0.1

≈ [tex](e^{21.6} + 3 - (e^{21.5) + 3}) / 0.1[/tex]

Calculate the values:

f'(1.5) ≈ [tex](e^{21.6} + 3 - (e^{21.5) + 3}) / 0.1[/tex]

≈ (23.985 + 3 - (20.086 + 3)) / 0.1

≈ 6.899 / 0.1

≈ 68.99

Approximation using the forward difference formula with h = 0.1 is f'(1.5) ≈ 68.99.

Central Difference Formula ([tex]h = 10^{-k},[/tex] where k = 2):

Using the central difference formula, we have:

f'(1.5) ≈ (f(1.5 + h) - f(1.5 - h)) / (2 * h)

For k = 2, h = [tex]10^{-2}[/tex] = 0.01:

f'(1.5) ≈ (f(1.5 + 0.01) - f(1.5 - 0.01)) / (2 * 0.01)

≈ (f(1.51) - f(1.49)) / 0.02

≈ [tex](e^{21.51} + 3 - (e^{21.49} + 3)) / 0.02[/tex]

Calculate the values:

f'(1.5) ≈ [tex](e^{21.51} + 3 - (e^{21.49} + 3)) / 0.02[/tex]

≈ (54.711 + 3 - (49.402 + 3)) / 0.02

≈ 5.309 / 0.02

≈ 265.45

Approximation using the central difference formula with h = 0.01 is f'(1.5) ≈ 265.45.

Therefore, the approximate values of f'(1.5) using the forward difference formula and the central difference formula are approximately 68.99 and 265.45, respectively.

To know more central difference formula about :

brainly.com/question/29132693

#SPJ4

Green's Theorem relates a line integral around a closed curve to a double integral over the region enclosed by the curve. It states that for a vector field F = (P, Q) and a curve C enclosing a region D.

The line integral ∮ F · dr can be calculated as the double integral over D of (∂Q/∂x - ∂P/∂y) dA, where dA represents the infinitesimal area element.To evaluate a line integral using Green's Theorem, we need to follow these steps:

Determine the vector field F = (P, Q).

Find the partial derivatives ∂P/∂y and ∂Q/∂x.

Calculate the double integral (∂Q/∂x - ∂P/∂y) dA over the region D enclosed by the curve C.

For each part of the problem, the specific vector field F and the curves C formed by the given equations need to be identified. Then, the corresponding partial derivatives can be computed, and the double integral can be evaluated to find the value of the line integral.

In conclusion, Green's Theorem provides a method to evaluate line integrals by converting them into double integrals over the region enclosed by the curve. By following the steps mentioned above, one can calculate the line integrals for each given vector field and curve in the problem using Green's Theorem.

To learn more about Green's Theorem click here : brainly.com/question/30763441

#SPJ11

A pregnancy that produces a z-score of 2.319 would be considered significantly long in duration. The correct option is "Yes.

In the context of statistics, a z-score is a standard score that measures how many standard deviations a value is from the mean. It can be positive or negative. If the z-score is positive, it means the value is above the mean, and if it is negative, it means the value is below the mean.A z-score of 2.319 is equivalent to 2.319 standard deviations above the mean.

Since the mean and standard deviation for pregnancy duration are known, it is possible to use z-scores to determine whether a pregnancy duration is significantly long or short.A z-score of 2.319 is considered significant because it falls within the range of values that are beyond two standard deviations from the mean.

Therefore, a pregnancy that produces a z-score of 2.319 would be considered significantly long in duration.

Learn more about standard deviation at:

https://brainly.com/question/14932655

#SPJ11

(a) Finding the basis for the kernel of T: The basis for the kernel of T is B₁ = (1, -1, 1), and T(x) = T(y) when x = (1, -1, 1) and y = (2, -2, 2).

(b) Finding the basis for the range of T: The basis for the range of T is B₂ = {(1, 1, 2), (2, 3, 5)}, and a vector v = (-2, -7, -4) is not in the range of T.

(a) To find a basis for the kernel of T, we need to determine the vectors x ∈ R³ such that T(x) = 0. In other words, we need to find the solutions to the homogeneous equation T(x) = 0.

Setting up the equation T(x) = 0, we have:

x₁ + 2x₂ + x₃ = 0

x₁ + 3x₂ + 2x₃ = 0

2x₁ + 5x₂ + 3x₃ = 0

We can write this as a system of linear equations:

x₁ + 2x₂ + x₃ = 0

x₁ + 3x₂ + 2x₃ = 0

2x₁ + 5x₂ + 3x₃ = 0

To solve this system, we can use row reduction. Writing the augmented matrix, we have:

[1 2 1 | 0]

[1 3 2 | 0]

[2 5 3 | 0]

Applying row reduction operations:

R₂ = R₂ - R₁

R₃ = R₃ - 2R₁

[1 2 1 | 0]

[0 1 1 | 0]

[0 1 1 | 0]

R₃ = R₃ - R₂

[1 2 1 | 0]

[0 1 1 | 0]

[0 0 0 | 0]

We can see that the third row is a linear combination of the first two rows, resulting in a row of zeros. This tells us that there is a dependency among the variables x₁, x₂, and x₃. Thus, the system is underdetermined, and we have one free variable.

Choosing x₃ = t (a free parameter), we can express the other variables in terms of t:

x₁ + 2x₂ + t = 0 ---> x₁ = -2x₂ - t

x₂ + t = 0 ---> x₂ = -t

Therefore, the general solution to the system is given by:

x = (-2x₂ - t, -t, t)

= (-2(-t) - t, -t, t)

= (t, -t, t)

We can choose a basis for the kernel of T by selecting values for t. Let's choose t = 1:

x₁ = 1, x₂ = -1, x₃ = 1

Thus, a basis for the kernel of T is given by the vector:

B₁ = (1, -1, 1)

To find x ‡ y such that T(x) = T(y), we can choose any two vectors x and y that satisfy this condition. Let's choose x = (1, -1, 1) and y = (2, -2, 2):

T(x) = T(1, -1, 1) = (1 + 2(-1) + 1, 1 + 3(-1) + 2, 2(1) + 5(-1) + 3(1))

= (1 - 2 + 1, 1 - 3 + 2, 2 - 5 + 3)

= (0, 0, 0)

T(y) = T(2, -2, 2) = (2 + 2(-2) + 2, 2 + 3(-2) + 2, 2(2) + 5(-2) + 3(2))

= (2 - 4 + 2, 2 - 6 + 2, 4 - 10 + 6)

= (0, 0, 0)

Therefore, T(x) = T(y) = (0, 0, 0) for x = (1, -1, 1) and y = (2, -2, 2).

(b) To find a basis for the range of T, we need to determine the vectors v ∈ R³ such that there exists x ∈ R³ satisfying T(x) = v. In other words, we need to find the vectors v that can be obtained as the image of some x under the transformation T.

We can rewrite the equations of T(x) as:

T(x) = (x₁ + 2x₂ + x₃, x₁ + 3x₂ + 2x₃, 2x₁ + 5x₂ + 3x₃)

From this form, we can observe that the range of T is the set of all vectors (v₁, v₂, v₃) that can be expressed as a linear combination of the columns of the matrix associated with T. Thus, the range of T is the span of the column vectors:

C₁ = (1, 1, 2)

C₂ = (2, 3, 5)

C₃ = (1, 2, 3)

To find a basis for the range of T, we need to determine if these vectors are linearly independent. If they are, they will form a basis; otherwise, we need to remove any redundant vectors.

To check for linear independence, we can write the vectors as columns of a matrix and perform row reduction:

[1 2 1]

[1 3 2]

[2 5 3]

Using row reduction, we obtain:

[1 2 1]

[0 1 1]

[0 1 1]

Since the third row is a linear combination of the first two rows, we can remove it without changing the span. Thus, a basis for the range of T is given by the remaining vectors:

B₂ = {(1, 1, 2), (2, 3, 5)}

To find a vector v that is not in the range of T, we need to find a vector that cannot be expressed as a linear combination of the vectors in the basis B₂. One such vector is the vector orthogonal to the basis vectors.

We can find the orthogonal vector by taking the cross product of the basis vectors:

(1, 1, 2) × (2, 3, 5) = (1(3) - 1(5), -1(2) - 1(5), 1(2) - 2(3))

= (-2, -7, -4)

Thus, a vector v = (-2, -7, -4) is not in the range of T.

To learn more about vectors visit : https://brainly.com/question/25705666

#SPJ11

The function g(x) = 7x² represents a quadratic function. It is a parabola that opens upwards (since the coefficient of x² is positive) and is stretched vertically by a factor of 7 compared to the basic parabolic shape.

Given data ,

Let the function be represented as g ( x )

where g ( x ) = 7x²

Vertex: The vertex of the parabola is located at the point (0, 0). This is the lowest point on the graph, also known as the minimum point.

Axis of Symmetry: The axis of symmetry is the vertical line passing through the vertex, which in this case is the y-axis (x = 0).

Symmetry: The parabola is symmetric with respect to the y-axis, meaning if you fold the graph along the y-axis, the two halves would perfectly overlap.

Increasing and Decreasing Intervals: The function g(x) = 7x² is always increasing or non-decreasing. As x moves to the right or left from the vertex, the values of g(x) increase.

Concavity: The graph of the function is concave upward, forming a "U" shape.

Hence , the graph of the function g ( x ) = 7x² is plotted.

To learn more about equation of graph of polynomials click :

https://brainly.com/question/16957172

#SPJ1

In this hypothetical prospective cohort study, the relationship between pesticide exposure and the risk of breast cancer is investigated.

A total of 857 women aged 18-60 were followed up for 12 years, and 229 cases of breast cancer were identified. Among the women studied, 541 had exposure to pesticides, and 185 of them developed breast cancer.

10. The incidence among those who were exposed to pesticides can be calculated by dividing the number of breast cancer cases among exposed individuals by the total number of individuals exposed. In this case, the incidence among those exposed to pesticides is 185/541 = 0.342 or 34.2%.

11. Similarly, the incidence among those who were not exposed to pesticides can be calculated by dividing the number of breast cancer cases among unexposed individuals by the total number of individuals unexposed. Since the total number of women in the study is 857 and the number of women exposed to pesticides is 541, the number of women not exposed to pesticides is 857 - 541 = 316. Among them, 44 developed breast cancer. Therefore, the incidence among those not exposed to pesticides is 44/316 = 0.139 or 13.9%.

12. The relative risk of getting breast cancer for those who use pesticides compared to those who do not can be calculated as the ratio of the incidence among the exposed group to the incidence among the unexposed group. In this case, the relative risk is 0.342/0.139 = 2.46.

13. The interpretation of the relative risk depends on the value obtained. A relative risk greater than 1 indicates a positive association, meaning that the exposure to pesticides is associated with an increased risk of breast cancer. In this case, the relative risk of 2.46 suggests that the use of pesticides is associated with a higher risk of developing breast cancer.

learn more about prospective cohort study here; brainly.com/question/30763408

#SPJ11

A link between inputs and outputs where each input is connected to just one result is called a function.

Given function is f(x,y) = 3x + 2y

We are given a point (z,y) = (1,-1) which,

we need to prove as f(x,y) = 1 from first principles.

In order to prove f(x,y) = 1,

we need to calculate f(1,-1) and show that it is equal to 1.

f(x,y) = 3x + 2yf(1,-1)

= 3(1) + 2(-1)

= 3 - 2

= 1

Therefore, f(1,-1) = 1.

Hence, we have proved that f(x,y) = 1 at ,

(z,y) = (1,-1) from first principles.

To know more about function visit:

https://brainly.com/question/11624077

#SPJ11

We have shown that when (x, y) = (1, -1), the function f(x, y) equals 1 according to the given function definition.

In mathematics, a function definition establishes the relationship between elements from two sets, typically referred to as the domain and the codomain. It describes how each element from the domain corresponds to a unique element in the codomain.

To prove that the function f(x, y) = 3x + 2y equals 1 when evaluated at the point (x, y) = (1, -1) using first principles, we need to substitute the given values into the function and verify that it yields the desired result.

Substituting x = 1 and y = -1 into the function:

f(1, -1) = 3(1) + 2(-1)

= 3 - 2

= 1

To know more about domain, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28599653

#SPJ11

The solution to the trigonometric equation in this problem is given as follows:

x = -3/7.

The trigonometric equation for this problem is defined as follows:

sin(-3 - 7x) = 0.

The sine ratio assumes a value of zero when the input is given as follows:

0.

Hence the value of x, which is the solution to the trigonometric equation in this problem, is given as follows:

-3 - 7x = 0

7x = -3

x = -3/7.

More can be learned about trigonometric equations at https://brainly.com/question/24349828

#SPJ4

i. The solution for the given problem is [tex]y(x) = (1/8)e* - (1/4)e^(-2x) - (1/8)e^(-4x)[/tex].

ii. the general solution is the sum of the complementary and particular solutions: [tex]y = y_c + y_p[/tex].

i. To solve the given second-order linear differential equation [tex]y"+6y'+8y=e*[/tex] with initial conditions y(0) = 0 and y'(0) = 0 using the method of undetermined coefficients, we first find the complementary solution by solving the homogeneous equation[tex]y"+6y'+8y=0[/tex]. The characteristic equation is [tex]r^2 + 6r + 8 = 0[/tex], which factors to (r+2)(r+4) = 0. Thus, the complementary solution is [tex]y_c = c1e^(-2x) + c2e^(-4x)[/tex], where c1 and c2 are constants.

Next, we determine the particular solution for the non-homogeneous equation. Since the right-hand side is e*, we assume a particular solution of the form [tex]y_p = Ae*[/tex], where A is a constant coefficient. Substituting this into the original equation, we find that A = 1/8. Thus, the particular solution is [tex]y_p = (1/8)e*[/tex].

The general solution is the sum of the complementary and particular solutions: [tex]y = y_c + y_p[/tex]. By applying the initial conditions y(0) = 0 and y'(0) = 0, we can find the values of c1 and c2. The solution for the given problem is [tex]y(x) = (1/8)e* - (1/4)e^(-2x) - (1/8)e^(-4x)[/tex].

ii. The method of undetermined coefficients is not suitable for solving the spring-mass system differential equation [tex]y"+2y = x" sin 7x[/tex] with the given initial conditions y(0) = 1 and y'(0) = -1. This is because the right-hand side of the equation, x" sin 7x, contains a term with a second derivative of x multiplied by a sine function.

In this case, a suitable method to solve the problem is the method of variation of parameters. The steps of this method involve finding the complementary solution by solving the homogeneous equation y"+2y = 0, which gives the solution [tex]y_c = c1e^(-√2x) + c2e^(√2x)[/tex], where c1 and c2 are constants.

Next, we assume the particular solution as [tex]y_p = u1(x)y1(x) + u2(x)y2(x)[/tex], where y1 and y2 are linearly independent solutions of the homogeneous equation, and [tex]u1(x)[/tex] and [tex]u2(x)[/tex] are functions to be determined. We then substitute this form into the differential equation and solve for [tex]u1(x)[/tex]and [tex]u2(x)[/tex] using the variation of parameters formulas.

Finally, the general solution is the sum of the complementary and particular solutions: [tex]y = y_c + y_p[/tex]. By applying the given initial conditions y(0) = 1 and y'(0) = -1, we can find the specific values of the constants and complete the solution for the problem.

To learn more about particular solutions click here

brainly.com/question/31591549

#SPJ11

a) Null hypothesis ( H₀ ): Caffeine does not affect energy expenditure (µ = 0).

  Alternative hypothesis ( H₁ ): Caffeine increases energy expenditure (µ > 0).

b) Requirements of the hypothesis test:

  1. Random sample: The participants were randomly assigned to either the placebo or caffeine group.

  2. Independence: It is assumed that the energy expenditure measurements for each participant are independent.

  3. Normality: It is stated that the differences in energy expenditure follow a normal distribution.

c) Test statistic:

  The test statistic for this hypothesis test is the t-statistic, which is given by:

  wherethe sample mean difference, µ₀ is the hypothesized mean difference under the null hypothesis, s is the sample standard deviation, and n is the sample size.

  Given:

  Sample mean difference= 18 kJ

  Standard deviation (s) = 19 kJ

  Sample size (n) = 10

  Hypothesized mean difference under the null hypothesis (µ₀) = 0

  Substituting these values into the formula, we get:

  t = (18 - 0) / (19 / √10) = 9.5238

d) P-value:

  The p-value is the probability of obtaining a test statistic as extreme as, or more extreme than, the observed test statistic, assuming the null hypothesis is true. Since the alternative hypothesis is one-sided (µ > 0), the p-value is the probability of observing a t-statistic greater than the calculated value of 9.5238.

  Using the t-distribution table or a statistical software, we find the p-value to be very small (less than 0.001).

e) Decision:

  We compare the p-value with the significance level (α = 0.001). If the p-value is less than α, we reject the null hypothesis. Otherwise, we fail to reject the null hypothesis.

  In this case, the p-value is less than 0.001, so we reject the null hypothesis.

f) Conclusion:

  Based on the data and the hypothesis test, there is strong evidence to conclude that caffeine appears to increase energy expenditure in sedentary females.

Learn more about probability here: brainly.com/question/31828911

#SPJ11

If there was a greater yield from the same plot the year before compared to the actual yield from last year, it is expected that the propensity score would increase significantly.

The propensity score is a measure of the probability of receiving a treatment (or being in a specific group) given a set of covariates. In this case, the treatment could be the different conditions or factors that affected the yield of the plot, and the covariates could include variables such as soil quality, weather conditions, fertilizer usage, etc.

When the actual yield from last year is lower than the yield from the previous year, it indicates that the conditions or factors affecting the yield might have changed. This change in conditions is likely to result in a change in the propensity score.

Since the propensity score represents the likelihood of being in a specific group (having a certain yield) given the covariates, an increase in the yield from the previous year suggests a higher probability of being in the group with the greater yield. Therefore, the propensity score would be expected to increase significantly in this scenario.

In summary, when there is a greater yield from the same plot the year before compared to the actual yield from last year, the propensity score is expected to increase significantly.

Learn more about probability here:

https://brainly.com/question/32004014

#SPJ11

The most accurate statement that can be obtained from the data in the two-way frequency table is option D. Women are less likely to prefer eating fish than men.

From the table, one can calculate the proportions of men and women who prefer eating fish and red meat:

Proportion of men who prefer fish: 11 / (11 + 28)

                                                       = 0.282

Proportion of women who prefer fish: 6 / (6 + 10)

                                                         =0.375

Proportion of men who prefer red meat: 28 / (11 + 28)

                                                                = 0.718

Proportion of women who prefer red meat: 10 / (6 + 10)

                                                                    = 0.625

Based on the proportion above, women have a higher proportion (0.375) of preferring fish compared to men (0.282). So,, statement D is supported by the data, and thus is correct.

Learn more about   two-way frequency  from

https://brainly.com/question/30713468

#SPJ1

See text below

                                               Men      Women

Prefers to eat fish                 11           6    

Prefers to eat red meat          28         10

(1) The proof of the displacement equation is determined as (dx/dt)² = (u + at)² .

(2) The distance travelled by the car after 3 hours is 69 miles.

For the proof of the displacement equation we will use the average displacement equation and final velocity equation as follows;

x = t(v + u )/2 ---- (1)

where;

v = u + at ---- (2)

Substitute (2) into (1)

x = t(u + at + u )/2

x = t(2u + at)/2

x = (2ut + at²)/2

x = ut + ¹/₂at²

dx/dt = u + at  

(dx/dt)² = (u + at)² ----proved

The distance travelled by the car after 3 hours is calculated by applying the following equation;

x = ∫ v(t)

So the integral of the velocity of the car gives the distance travelled by the car.

x(t)= (2t²/2) + 20t

x(t) = t² + 20t

when the time, t = 3 hours, the distance is calculated as;

x (3) = (3² ) + 20 (3)

x (3) = 9 + 60

x(3) = 69 miles

Learn more about displacement here: https://brainly.com/question/2109763

#SPJ4

The complete question is below;

Prove that (dx/dt)² = (u + at)².

Consider a car traveling along a straight road. Suppose that its velocity (in mi/hr) at any time 't' (t > 0), is given by the function v(t) = 2t + 20. Find the distance travelled by the car after 3 hrs if it starts from rest.

The length of the curve y = sin(3x)

from x = 0

to x = π/6 is given by

[tex]\frac{1}{3}(\sqrt {10} + 3\ln (2 + \sqrt 3 ))[/tex]

The length of the curve y = sin(3x)

from x = 0

to x = π/6 is given by:

 [tex]$\int\limits_0^{\pi/6} {\sqrt {1 + {({y^{'}})^2}} dx}$[/tex]
Given, the curve is y = sin(3x)
We have to find the length of the curve from x = 0

to x = π/6 using the formula

[tex]$\int\limits_0^{\pi/6} {\sqrt {1 + {({y^{'}})^2}} dx}$[/tex]
We know that the derivative of y with respect to x is y',

so y' = 3cos(3x)
Using the formula we get,

[tex]$\int\limits_0^{\pi/6} {\sqrt {1 + {({y^{'}})^2}} dx}[/tex]

=[tex]\int\limits_0^{\pi/6} {\sqrt {1 + 9{{\cos }^2}3x} dx} $[/tex]
Now, substitute u = 3x,

then [tex]$\frac{du}{dx} = 3$[/tex]

and [tex]$dx = \frac{1}{3}du$[/tex]
Hence, the integral becomes

[tex]$\int\limits_0^{\pi/6} {\sqrt {1 + 9{{\cos }^2}3x} dx}[/tex]

= [tex]\frac{1}{3}\int\limits_0^{\pi/2} {\sqrt {1 + 9{{\cos }^2}u} du}[/tex]

Let's substitute [tex]$t = \tan u$[/tex],

then dt =[tex]{\sec ^2}udu$ and $\sec^2 u[/tex]

=1 + \tan^2 u

=[tex]1 + {t^2}$[/tex]

Also, when $u = 0,

t =[tex]\tan 0[/tex]

= 0

and when [tex]$u = \frac{\pi}{6},[/tex]

t =[tex]\tan \frac{\pi}{6}[/tex]

= [tex]\frac{\sqrt 3 }{3}$[/tex]
Hence, the integral becomes

[tex]$\frac{1}{3}\int\limits_0^{\pi/2} {\sqrt {1 + 9{{\cos }^2}u} du}[/tex]

=[tex]\frac{1}{3}\int\limits_0^{\sqrt 3 /3} {\sqrt {1 + {{\sec }^2}{\tan ^{ - 1}}t} dt} \\[/tex]

=[tex]\frac{1}{3}\int\limits_0^{\sqrt 3 /3} {\sqrt {1 + {{(1 + {t^2})}^2}} dt} \frac{1}{3}\int\limits_0^{\sqrt 3 /3} {\sqrt {1 + {{(1 + {t^2})}^2}} dt}[/tex]

On simplifying and solving the integral, we get the length of the curve from x = 0

to x = π/6 is given by

[tex]L = \frac{1}{3}(\sqrt {10} + 3\ln (2 + \sqrt 3 ))[/tex]

Therefore, the length of the curve y = sin(3x) from x = 0 to x = π/6 is given by [tex]$\frac{1}{3}(\sqrt {10} + 3\ln (2 + \sqrt 3 ))$[/tex]

To know more about integral visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30094386

#SPJ11

(A) The Markov chain {X_n} with the given transition probabilities is a martingale.

(B) The expected value of X_n for each fixed n is equal to 2.

(C) The expected value of X_T, where T is the stopping time when X_n reaches either 2^(-2) or 5, is also equal to 2.

(D) The probability of X_T being equal to 5 is 1/3.

(E) The sequence {X_n} converges almost surely to a random variable X. (F) The probability distribution of X is determined to be P(X = x) = 2^(-|x|) for all x in the state space S.

(G)The expected value of X is equal to the limit of the expected values of X_n as n approaches infinity.

(a) To show that {X_n} is a martingale, we need to demonstrate that E(X_{n+1} | X_0, X_1, ..., X_n) = X_n for all n. Since the transition probabilities only depend on the current state, and not the previous states, the conditional expectation simplifies to E(X_{n+1} | X_n). By examining the transition probabilities, we can see that for any state X_n, the expected value of X_{n+1} is equal to X_n. Therefore, {X_n} is a martingale.

(b) For each fixed n, we can calculate the expected value of X_n using the transition probabilities and the definition of conditional expectation. By considering the possible transitions from each state, we find that the expected value of X_n is equal to 2 for all n.

(c) The expected value of X_T can be computed by conditioning on the possible states that X_T can take. Since T is the stopping time when X_n reaches either 2^(-2) or 5, the expected value of X_T is equal to the weighted average of these two states, according to their respective probabilities. Therefore, E(X_T) = (2^(-2) * 1/3) + (5 * 2/3) = 13/3.

(d) To compute P(X_T = 5), we need to consider the transitions leading to state 5. From state 4, the only possible transition is to state 5, with probability 1/2. From state 5, the chain can stay in state 5 with probability 1/2. Therefore, the probability of reaching state 5 is 1/2, and P(X_T = 5) = 1/2.

(e) The convergence of {X_n} to a random variable X can be established by proving that {X_n} is a bounded martingale. Since the state space S includes both positive and negative powers of 2, X_n cannot go beyond the maximum and minimum values in S. Therefore, {X_n} is bounded, and by the martingale convergence theorem, it converges almost surely to a random variable X.

(f) The probability distribution of X can be determined by observing that the chain spends equal time in each state. As X_n converges to X, the probability of X being in a particular state x is proportional to the time spent in that state. Since the Markov chain spends 2^(-|x|) units of time in state x, the probability distribution of X is P(X = x) = 2^(-|x|) for all x in the state space S.

(g) The expected value of X is equal to the limit of the expected values of X_n as n approaches infinity. Since the expected value of X_n is always 2, this limit is also equal to 2.

Complete Question:

Consider a Markov chain {Xn } with state space S=N∪{2 −m:m∈N} (i.e., the set of all positive integers together with all the negative integer powers of 2). Suppose the transition probabilities are given by p 2 −m ,2 −m−1 =2/3 and p 2 −m ,2 −m+1=1/3 for all m∈ N, and p 1,2 −1 =2/3 and p 1,2=1/3, and p i,i−1 =p i,i+1 =1/2 for all i≥2, with p i,j =0 otherwise. Let X 0=2. [You may assume without proof that E∣Xn ∣<∞ for all n.] And, let T=inf{n≥1 : X n = 2-2or 5} (a) Prove that {X n} is a martingale. (b) Determine whether or not E(X n)=2 for each fixed n∈N. (c) Compute (with explanation) E(X T). (d) Compute P(XT=5) (e) Prove {Xn} converges w.p. 1 to some random variable X. (f) For this random variable X, determine P(X=x) for all x. (g) Determine whether or not E(X)=lim n→∞E(X n).

Learn more about Markov chain:

brainly.com/question/30465344

#SPJ11

(a) The augmented matrix of the system is:

[ 1  4  2 | 0 ]

[ 2  5  1 | 0 ]

[ 3  6  0 | 0 ]

(b)The reduced row echelon form is:

[ 1  0  0 | 0 ]

[ 0  1  0 | 0 ]

[ 0  0  1 | 0 ]

(c)The basic variables are x₁, x₂, and x₃

(d)  The general solution of the system is:

x₁ = 0

x₂ = 0

x₃ = 0

(e) The solution in parametric vector form is:

[x₁, x₂, x₃] = [0, 0, 0] + t[0, 0, 0]

(f) False.

(g)t = -1

x = 1

y = -1

z = 2

(a) The augmented matrix of the system is:

[ 1  4  2 | 0 ]

[ 2  5  1 | 0 ]

[ 3  6  0 | 0 ]

(b) To reduce the augmented matrix to reduced row echelon form (rref):

1. Multiply row 1 by -2 and add to row 2:

[ 1  4  2 | 0 ]

[ 0 -3 -3 | 0 ]

[ 3  6  0 | 0 ]

2. Multiply row 1 by -3 and add to row 3:

[ 1  4   2 | 0 ]

[ 0 -3  -3 | 0 ]

[ 0 -6  -6 | 0 ]

3. Multiply row 2 by -1/3:

[ 1  4   2 | 0 ]

[ 0  1   1 | 0 ]

[ 0 -6  -6 | 0 ]

4. Add row 2 to row 1 and row 2 to row 3:

[ 1  0   6 | 0 ]

[ 0  1   1 | 0 ]

[ 0  0  -3 | 0 ]

5. Multiply row 3 by -1/3:

[ 1  0   6 | 0 ]

[ 0  1   1 | 0 ]

[ 0  0   1 | 0 ]

6. Add -6 times row 3 to row 1 and add -1 times row 3 to row 2:

[ 1  0  0 | 0 ]

[ 0  1  0 | 0 ]

[ 0  0  1 | 0 ]

The reduced row echelon form is:

[ 1  0  0 | 0 ]

[ 0  1  0 | 0 ]

[ 0  0  1 | 0 ]

(c) The basic variables are x₁, x₂, and x₃, since they correspond to the columns with leading ones in the reduced row echelon form. The free variables are none, since there are no non-leading variables.

(d) The general solution of the system is:

x₁ = 0

x₂ = 0

x₃ = 0

The role of the free variable is to allow for infinitely many solutions.

(e) The solution in parametric vector form is:

[x₁, x₂, x₃] = [0, 0, 0] + t[0, 0, 0]

where t is any real number.

(f) False. The system has infinitely many solutions, since there is a free variable

(g)Formulas setup:

x = -t

y = t

z = 2t

Answers:

t = -1

x = 1

y = -1

z = 2

For more such questions on matrix

https://brainly.com/question/30389982

#SPJ8

The critical point x = 0 corresponds to a local maximum while the critical point x = -6 is inconclusive.

The critical points of the function f(x) = -x³ - 9x²,  to find the values of x where the derivative of the function is equal to zero or undefined.

Find the derivative of f(x):

f'(x) = -3x² - 18x

Set the derivative equal to zero and solve for x:

-3x² - 18x = 0

Factor out -3x:

-3x(x + 6) = 0

Setting each factor equal to zero gives two critical points:

-3x = 0 => x = 0

x + 6 = 0 => x = -6

Determine the nature of each critical point using the second derivative test:

To apply the second derivative test, derivative of f(x):

f''(x) = -6x - 18

a) For the critical point x = 0:

Evaluate f''(0):

f''(0) = -6(0) - 18 = -18

Since f''(0) is negative, this critical point corresponds to a local maximum.

b) For the critical point x = -6:

Evaluate f''(-6):

f''(-6) = -6(-6) - 18 = 0

Since f''(-6) is zero, the second derivative test is inconclusive for this critical point. It does not determine whether it is a local maximum, local minimum, or neither.

To know more about critical here

https://brainly.com/question/15091786

#SPJ4

In this scenario, a volleyball player has a 15% chance of making a successful serve, and the serves are independent of each other. The probabilities of making a successful serve on the 3rd attempt and the 10th attempt are calculated.

(a) To calculate the probability that the player will make her 3rd successful serve on the 10th try, we need to consider the probability of two unsuccessful serves followed by a successful serve on the 3rd try and then seven more unsuccessful serves. Since the probability of making a successful serve is 15%, the probability of making an unsuccessful serve is 85%. Therefore, the probability can be calculated as: [tex](0.85^2) * (0.15) * (0.85^7)[/tex].

(b) Given that the player has already made two successful serves in nine attempts, we want to find the probability of making a successful serve on the 10th try. The probability can be calculated as: (0.15) * (0.15) * ([tex]0.85^7[/tex]).

(c) The reason for the discrepancy between the probabilities in parts (a) and (b) is that the previous attempts affect the probability in part (b). In part (a), we start from the beginning and calculate the probability of specific outcomes. However, in part (b), we already have information about the previous attempts, and the probability calculation takes into account the specific scenario of having two successful serves in nine attempts. Therefore, the probabilities differ because the context and conditions of the scenarios are different.

Learn more about attempt here:

https://brainly.com/question/11405237

#SPJ11.

The maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) of the variance of a Bernoulli random variable with success probability p is given by X(1-X), where X is the sample mean of the Bernoulli random variables.

To show that the MLE of Var(X 1) is X(1-X), we can start by calculating the MLE of p, denoted as p. Since X 1,...,X n are independent and identically distributed Bernoulli(p) random variables, the likelihood function L(p) is given by the product of the individual probabilities:

L(p) = T [p^xi * (1-p)^(1-xi)], for i=1 to n

To find the MLE of p, we maximize the likelihood function L(p) with respect to p. Taking the logarithm of the likelihood function, we have:

log L(p) = ∑[x i * log( p) + (1-x i) * log (1-p)], for i = 1 to n

Next, we differentiate log L(p) with respect to p and set the derivative equal to zero to find the maximum likelihood estimate:

d/dp (log L (p)) = ∑[(x i/p) - (1-x i)/(1-p)] = 0

Simplifying the equation, we get:

∑[x i/p - (1-x i)/(1-p)] = 0

∑[(x i - p)/(p (1-p))] = 0

Rearranging the equation, we have:

∑[(x i - p)/(p( 1-p))] = 0

∑[x i - p] = 0

∑[x i] - np = 0

∑[x i] = n p

Dividing both sides of the equation by n, we obtain:

X = p

Therefore, the MLE of p is the sample mean X. Now, to find the MLE of Var(X 1), we substitute P = X into the formula for Var(X 1):

Var(X1) = p(1 - p) = X(1 - X)

Hence, we have shown that the MLE of Var(X 1) is X(1-X), where X is the sample mean of the Bernoulli random variables.

Learn more about Bernoulli here: brainly.com/question/13098748
#SPJ11

The estimated instantaneous velocity when t=2 is -75 ft/s.To find the average velocity for a given time period, we need to calculate the change in position divided by the change in time.

A. For the time period beginning when t=2 and lasting 0.01 seconds: The initial position at t=2 is given by y(2) = 29(2) - 26(2^2) = 58 - 104 = -46 ft. The position after 0.01 seconds is y(2.01) = 29(2.01) - 26(2.01^2) = 58.29 - 107.2626 ≈ -48.9726 ft. The change in position is Δy = y(2.01) - y(2) ≈ -48.9726 - (-46) ≈ -2.9726 ft. The change in time is Δt = 0.01 seconds. The average velocity is Δy/Δt ≈ (-2.9726 ft) / (0.01 s) ≈ -297.26 ft/s.

B. For the time period beginning when t=2 and lasting 0.005 seconds: The initial position is still y(2) = -46 ft. The position after 0.005 seconds is y(2.005) = 29(2.005) - 26(2.005^2) ≈ -46.0321 ft. The change in position is Δy ≈ -46.0321 - (-46) ≈ -0.0321 ft. The change in time is Δt = 0.005 seconds. The average velocity is Δy/Δt ≈ (-0.0321 ft) / (0.005 s) ≈ -6.42 ft/s. C. For the time period beginning when t=2 and lasting 0.002 seconds: The initial position is still y(2) = -46 ft. The position after 0.002 seconds is y(2.002) = 29(2.002) - 26(2.002^2) ≈ -46.008 ft. The change in position is Δy ≈ -46.008 - (-46) ≈ -0.008 ft. The change in time is Δt = 0.002 seconds. The average velocity is Δy/Δt ≈ (-0.008 ft) / (0.002 s) ≈ -4 ft/s.

D. For the time period beginning when t=2 and lasting 0.001 seconds: The initial position is still y(2) = -46 ft. The position after 0.001 seconds is y(2.001) = 29(2.001) - 26(2.001^2) ≈ -46.002 ft. The change in position is Δy ≈ -46.002 - (-46) ≈ -0.002 ft. The change in time is Δt = 0.001 seconds. The average velocity is Δy/Δt ≈ (-0.002 ft) / (0.001 s) ≈ -2 ft/s. To estimate the instantaneous velocity when t=2, we can find the derivative of the position function y(t) with respect to t and evaluate it at t=2. y(t) = 29t - 26t^2. Taking the derivative, we have: y'(t) = 29 - 52t. Evaluating y'(t) at t=2, we get: y'(2) = 29 - 52(2) = 29 - 104 = -75 ft/s. Therefore, the estimated instantaneous velocity when t=2 is -75 ft/s.

To learn more about velocity, click here: brainly.com/question/23855996

#SPJ11

The correct answer is (d) 2 cos(kx)/v.

The Fourier transform of f(t) = 8(x − vt) + 8(x+vt) is given by:

ƒ(k) = ∫f(t)e^(-ikt)dt

= ∫[8(x-vt)+8(x+vt)]e^(-ikt)dt

= 8∫[x-vt]e^(-ikt)dt + 8∫[x+vt]e^(-ikt)dt

= 8e^(-ikvt)∫xe^(ikt)dt + 8e^(ikvt)∫xe^(-ikt)dt

Using integration by parts, we get:

∫xe^(ikt)dt = (xe^(ikt))/(ik) - (1/(ik))^2 e^(ikt)

Substituting the limits of integration and simplifying, we get:

∫xe^(ikt)dt = (1/ik^2)[e^(ik(x-vt)) - e^(ik(x+vt))]

Similarly, ∫xe^(-ikt)dt = (1/ik^2)[e^(-ik(x-vt)) - e^(-ik(x+vt))]

Substituting these values in the expression for ƒ(k), we get:

ƒ(k) = (8/ik^2)[e^(-ikvt)(e^(ikx) - e^(-ikx)) + e^(ikvt)(e^(-ikx) - e^(ikx))]

Simplifying further, we get:

ƒ(k) = (16i/k^2v)sin(kx)

Using Euler's formula, we can write:

sin(kx) = (1/2i)(e^(ikx) - e^(-ikx))

Substituting this value in the expression for ƒ(k), we get:

ƒ(k) = 8(e^(-ikvt) - e^(ikvt))/kv

= 16i/k^2v sin(kx)/2i

= 2cos(kx)/v

Therefore, the correct answer is (d) 2 cos(kx)/v.

Visit here to learn more about Fourier transform brainly.com/question/1542972

#SPJ11

The sampling distribution of sample mean for a random sample of size n-3 years would resemble population distribution,the sampling distribution for random sample of size 9 years will be more bell-shaped.

The sampling distribution of the sample mean refers to the distribution of sample means obtained from repeated sampling of a fixed sample size from a population. In the given scenario, the population distribution of the number of days with snowfall in Pleasant Valley is represented by a probability histogram.

For a random sample of size n-3 years, the sampling distribution of the sample mean would closely resemble the population distribution. This is because the sample size is relatively small, and the sample means would vary around the population mean, maintaining the same shape as the population distribution.

However, as the sample size increases, the sampling distribution tends to become more bell-shaped and approximate a normal distribution. For a random sample of size 9 years, the sampling distribution would exhibit more symmetry and approach a normal distribution. This is due to the central limit theorem, which states that as sample size increases, the distribution of sample means becomes approximately normal regardless of the shape of the population distribution, as long as the samples are independent and the sample size is sufficiently large.

For a random sample of size 30 years, the sampling distribution would further approach a normal distribution. With a larger sample size, the individual observations have less influence on the overall distribution, leading to a more pronounced bell-shaped curve.

In summary, the sampling distribution of the sample mean becomes more bell-shaped and approximates a normal distribution as the sample size increases, demonstrating the central limit theorem.

Learn more about sampling distribution here:

https://brainly.com/question/31465269

#SPJ11

The derivative of the function f(x) = 3x² - 4x + 1 can be found using the definition of the derivative. It is given by f'(x) = 6x - 4. Similarly, for the function g(x) = √(9 - x), the derivative can be determined using the definition of the derivative.

To find the derivative of f(x) = 3x² - 4x + 1 using the definition of the derivative, we apply the limit definition. Let h approach 0, and we have:

f'(x) = lim(h→0) [(f(x + h) - f(x))/h]

Substituting the function f(x) = 3x² - 4x + 1, we get:

f'(x) = lim(h→0) [(3(x + h)² - 4(x + h) + 1 - (3x² - 4x + 1))/h]

Expanding and simplifying the expression:

f'(x) = lim(h→0) [(3x² + 6xh + 3h² - 4x - 4h + 1 - 3x² + 4x - 1)/h]

The x² and x terms cancel out, leaving us with:

f'(x) = lim(h→0) [6xh + 3h² - 4h]/h

Further simplifying, we have:

f'(x) = lim(h→0) [h(6x + 3h - 4)]/h

Canceling the h terms:

f'(x) = lim(h→0) (6x + 3h - 4)

Taking the limit as h approaches 0, we obtain:

f'(x) = 6x - 4

Hence, the derivative of f(x) is f'(x) = 6x - 4.

Similarly, to find the derivative of g(x) = √(9 - x), we can apply the definition of the derivative and follow a similar process of taking the limit as h approaches 0. The detailed calculation involves using the properties of radicals and algebraic manipulations, resulting in the derivative g'(x) = (-1)/(2√(9 - x)).

Learn more about derivative here:

https://brainly.com/question/31684026

#SPJ11