Based on the quote , the following goals can be attributed to Ford:
To build a car anyone can use
To make cars more affordable
To use the best materials
What is Ford's goal?He wanted to make cars that were easy for anyone to use, no matter how much experience they had. This goal matches his idea of making a vehicle that many people can use and take advantage of.
Ford aimed to make the production cheaper and simplify the manufacturing process in order to decrease the price of his vehicles. Ford wanted to make it possible for more people, not just the rich, to be able to own a car.
Read more about goal here:
https://brainly.com/question/30165881
#SPJ1
My assignment is asking about the book Animal Farm, Chapter 1, and it says, "Please define the current governmental system on the farm. Consider who has power and how to maintain it." Please help me.
Answer:
Sure, I can help you with that.
In Chapter 1 of Animal Farm, the governmental system on the farm is a direct democracy. This means that all of the animals have an equal say in how the farm is run. The animals meet together to discuss important issues, and they vote on how to resolve them. The pigs are the most intelligent animals on the farm, so they often take on leadership roles. However, they are not allowed to have more power than any other animal.
The current governmental system on the farm is maintained by the animals' commitment to the principles of Animalism. Animalism is a set of beliefs that was created by Old Major, a wise old pig. The principles of Animalism include the following:
* All animals are equal.
* No animal shall sleep in a bed.
* No animal shall drink alcohol.
* No animal shall kill another animal.
* All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others.
The last principle is often interpreted as a warning against the dangers of power. It suggests that even in a system of direct democracy, there is always the potential for some animals to gain more power than others.
The governmental system on the farm is still in its early stages, and it is not yet clear how it will develop in the future. However, the principles of Animalism provide a foundation for a just and equitable society.
Here are some additional details about the governmental system on the farm:
* The animals hold regular meetings to discuss important issues.
* The animals vote on how to resolve issues.
* The pigs are often the leaders in these meetings, but they are not allowed to have more power than any other animal.
* The animals are committed to the principles of Animalism, which include the belief that all animals are equal.
Explanation:
Please mark me as Brainliest
match the pairs with each title
Title
Money exchanged for illegal alcohol
was unregulated by the government.
Some people drank too much alcohol
and abused their family members.
Police officers and politicians were
corrupted by gangster activity.
People rebelled and produced and
consumed alcohol in excess.
Pairs
to provide income tax
to decrease crime
to establish temperance
to reestablish morals
Answer:
Yes, that is correct. Barack Obama was able to win several key swing states that had previously voted for George W. Bush, including Florida, Ohio, and Virginia. In addition, he was able to win a number of other states that had traditionally voted for the Republican Party, such as Indiana and North Carolina. By winning these key swing states and expanding the Democratic Party's electoral base, Obama was able to secure a significant victory in the 2008 presidential election.
Explanation:
edmentum
Question of 29 Why do historians identify certain historical events as turning points?
Historians identify certain historical events as turning points because they mark significant shifts or changes in the course of history, shaping societies, cultures, politics, and economies in profound ways.
Historians identify certain historical events as turning points because they represent pivotal moments that significantly alter the trajectory of history.
Significance: Turning points are events that have a profound impact on societies, cultures, politics, or economies. They often bring about transformative changes that shape the course of history.Shift in Direction: These events mark a shift in the prevailing narrative or direction of a particular era or period. They introduce new ideas, ideologies, technologies, or social movements that reshape the status quo.Consequences: Turning points have far-reaching consequences that extend beyond the immediate time and place of the event. They can lead to long-term societal, political, or economic transformations, and their effects can be felt for generations.Historical Interpretation: Historians identify turning points through careful analysis and evaluation of primary and secondary sources. They consider the context, impact, and legacy of the event to determine its significance.Narrative Framing: Recognizing turning points helps historians construct a coherent narrative of history, highlighting key moments where change occurred and emphasizing their importance in understanding the broader historical landscape.Overall, identifying turning points allows historians to discern patterns, understand causality, and provide insights into the complex and dynamic nature of human history.
For more such question on Historians
https://brainly.com/question/24466312
#SPJ8
through unemployment during the great depression was widespread, it was higher in some parts of the united states than in others. An economic historian creates a table based on existing unemployment data from the depression, while a cultural historian interviews people who were unemployed at the time. What information would the cultural historian receive that the economic historian would not?
Answer:
The cultural historian who interviews people who were unemployed during the Great Depression would receive information that the economic historian, who creates a table based on existing unemployment data, would not have access to.
The economic historian's table would provide statistical data, such as the percentage of the population that was unemployed in different regions of the country. This data would be useful for understanding the scale and scope of the unemployment crisis during the Great Depression.
However, the cultural historian's interviews with people who were unemployed at the time would provide a more personal and subjective perspective on the experience of unemployment. The cultural historian would be able to gather firsthand accounts of the emotional and psychological impact of unemployment on individuals and families, as well as the ways in which people coped with the challenges of being out of work during this difficult time.
The cultural historian would also be able to gather information about the social and cultural factors that influenced the experience of unemployment, such as the stigma attached to being out of work or the ways in which race, gender, and class affected access to employment opportunities.
Overall, the cultural historian's interviews would provide a more nuanced and personal understanding of the experience of unemployment during the Great Depression, which would complement the statistical data provided by the economic historian's table.
How did the Civil War affect the economy of the North?
A. The Northern economy grew as factories produced large amounts
of goods for the war.
B. The Northern economy shrank as foreign countries refused to
trade with the Union.
C. The Northern economy stayed the same as no new jobs were
created during the war.
D. The Northern economy shrank as the Union was unable to trade
with the Confederacy.
In what two ways did the owners of the Lowell Mill differ from most employers during this era?
They provided their employees with transportation home.
They hired employees who were over the age of nine.
They provided employees with safe boarding houses.
They provided employees with educational opportunities.
They gave their employees twice the average salary
Answer:
“They Provided employees with Educational Opportunities” and “They provided employees with safe boarding houses”.
Explanation:
So C and D
The Lowell Mill owners differed from the common employer of their era by providing their employees with safe boarding houses and educational opportunities.
Explanation:The owners of the Lowell Mill differed from most employers during their era in two significant ways. First, they provided their employees with safe boarding houses. This was unlike many employers of the time who did not concern themselves with the living conditions of their workers. Second, they provided their employees with educational opportunities, allowing them to improve their skills and knowledge base beyond their work at the mill. This was also quite unique, as most employers of this era did not invest in the education of their workforce.
Learn more about Lowell Mill here:https://brainly.com/question/8668150
#SPJ12
What was the most important way the transatlantic slave trade affected African nations? OA. Entire villages disappeared because so many members were captured and sold as slaves. B. African leaders were often not able to negotiate treaties with European traders. OC. African nations were so interested in trade that they did not grow enough crops to survive. D. Many Africans became sick as they came into contact with diseases that European traders had.
Answer:
Entire villages disappeared because so many members were captured and sold as slaves.
Explanation:
The most important way the transatlantic slave trade affected African nations was that entire villages disappeared because so many members were captured and sold as slaves. This massive forced removal of people from their communities and homelands had devastating consequences for African societies. The slave trade disrupted social structures, families were torn apart, and communities were destabilized as a significant portion of their population was taken away. The loss of a large number of individuals resulted in a severe demographic impact, leading to depopulation and the disappearance of entire villages. This disruption and loss of human capital had long-lasting and profound effects on African nations.
Residents of utopian communities were attempting to achieve a state of
Looking back over all of history, one of the common reasons why wars started was because of religious disagreements. Even religions whose main tenants rest upon justice and peace (Christianity and Catholicism) spent hundreds of years fighting. This is due to a couple of factors. First humans are all too human. Second, the immeasurable importance of getting your religious answers right. When asked a question on a test our futures do not depend on us getting the correct answer. However, when it comes to religion there can be no measurement of its importance. So, when someone, in your town for Mrs. Hutchinson's case, starts informing everyone that their religious teachings and beliefs do not match with the Bible people became outraged. While some portray this as an outrage on the part of God this simply is ludicrous. God tells us throughout the Bible that He will be the judge and it is not our place to condemn.
So when we look at the question of if Mrs. Hutchinson committed a crime we can see that her stirring up their assurance of salvation made them scared. As many have pointed out, the biggest lesson from the past three years is that fear is the greatest and most powerful emotion. Because of their fear, the political and religious authorities of Massachusetts Bay were determined to get rid of Hutchinson, even though she had not broken any laws.
Her teachings, although not all correct, opened up the possibility that the puritan church had fallen into a trap not any different from the Catholics. They placed too much value on the teachings of the church rather than individually understanding and reading the bible.
While Mrs. Hutchinson espoused many ludicrous views, such as her being a prophetess and her notion that England and Boston would be destroyed, she helped shine a light on the Puritan community's falsehoods. How Can I agree with this?
While Mrs. Hutchinson's teachings may have contained some incorrect and exaggerated beliefs, she shed light on the shortcomings of the Puritan community's religious practices. Her challenge to the authority of the church and emphasis on individual interpretation of the Bible exposed the potential pitfalls of relying too heavily on institutional teachings.
Agreeing with the viewpoint presented, it is important to acknowledge that Mrs. Hutchinson's teachings were not entirely accurate or rational. Her claims of being a prophetess and predictions of imminent destruction were seen as extreme and baseless. However, her role in highlighting the shortcomings of the Puritan community should be recognized.
Mrs. Hutchinson's emphasis on individual understanding and interpretation of the Bible challenged the prevailing belief in the infallibility of institutional teachings. This opened up a space for critical thinking and questioning within the community. It drew attention to the potential dangers of blindly following religious authorities without engaging in personal examination and understanding of religious texts.
By highlighting the potential trap of relying solely on the teachings of the church, Mrs. Hutchinson contributed to a broader conversation about the importance of personal religious exploration and individual spiritual experiences. While her specific teachings may not have been fully accurate or accepted by the Puritan community, her influence sparked a dialogue and encouraged individuals to reevaluate their faith in light of their own interpretations of scripture.
Therefore, while caution must be exercised in endorsing all of Mrs. Hutchinson's teachings, her challenge to the authority of the church and promotion of individual understanding of the Bible helped expose some of the shortcomings within the Puritan community's religious practices.
Learn more about Bible here: https://brainly.com/question/30703259
#SPJ11
Explain the role of Germany’s unrestricted submarine warfare and the sinking of the RMS Lusitania on America’s entry into the war.
Answer:
Germany's unrestricted submarine warfare and the sinking of the RMS Lusitania were major factors that led to the United States' entry into World War I.
In early 1915, Germany began a policy of unrestricted submarine warfare, which meant that German submarines would attack any ships, including neutral ones, that entered designated war zones around the British Isles. The policy was intended to cut off Britain's supply lines and force it to surrender. However, the policy also resulted in the sinking of many American ships, which outraged the American public and led to calls for the U.S. to take action.
The sinking of the RMS Lusitania was a particularly significant event. The Lusitania was a British passenger liner that was travelling from New York to Liverpool in May 1915. The ship was carrying American passengers and was not armed, but it was carrying munitions and other military supplies. A German U-boat torpedoed the ship, causing it to sink and killing 1,198 people, including 128 Americans.
The sinking of the Lusitania outraged the American public and sparked widespread calls for the U.S. to enter the war. President Woodrow Wilson initially resisted these calls, but the sinking of several more American ships, including the Sussex in 1916, further inflamed public opinion and eventually led Wilson to declare war on Germany in April 1917.
Overall, Germany's unrestricted submarine warfare and the sinking of the Lusitania were major factors that led to the United States' entry into World War I. These events outraged the American public and convinced President Wilson and other leaders that the U.S. needed to take action to protect its interests and its citizens.
which one of the beatles attempts at keeping the band together during their final years were seen as controlling by the other three?
Answer:
The Beatle who attempted to keep the band together during their final years, in a way that was seen as controlling by the other three, was John Lennon.
As the band's relationship became more strained in 1969, John initially tried to keep the Beatles functioning as a creative and recording unit. However, his attempts such as insisting they record together at his home studio in Tittenhurst Park were viewed by Paul, George and Ringo as overly domineering and bossy. They felt John was losing touch with the other members' creative needs and interests.
John's forceful personality and tendency towards control also began to alienate the other Beatles, especially Paul. There were tensions over John taking over more of the songwriting and making unilateral decisions for the band without proper consultation or compromise.
By early 1970, the other Beatles had become increasingly unwilling to acquiesce to John's wishes. They resisted recording the way John wanted and pushed for more autonomy in the studio. This further exacerbated the fractures within the band.
So in summary, while John Lennon's initial attempts to keep the Beatles together in their later years came from a place of passion for the band, his domineering and controlling manner ultimately contributed further to the widening rift among members and pushed them towards breakup. The other Beatles grew weary of acquiescing to John's wishes and desired more equality and compromise.
Hope this provides a helpful overview! Let me know if you have any other questions.
Paul McCartney's attempts to keep the band together during their final years were seen as controlling by the other three Beatles.
Explanation:In the final years of the Beatles, Paul McCartney's attempts at keeping the band together were seen as controlling by the other three band members.
One example of this was when McCartney wanted to have an outside producer, Phil Spector, work on the Let It Be album without consulting the other members. This decision resulted in tension within the band and contributed to their eventual breakup.
The controlling behavior by McCartney was perceived as a way of exerting his influence and asserting his vision for the band, which led to conflicts with John Lennon, George Harrison, and Ringo Starr.
Learn more about Controlling behavior in the Beatles here:https://brainly.com/question/32790392
#SPJ
Throughout European history, Jewish people were forced to live in segregated communities called .
Answer: Ghettos
Explanation:
Jews were sanctioned off into segregated neighborhoods known as ghettos
In some rare cases with controversial bills, committee members will __________ because they fear any bad publicity that their suggestions or views on the bill could generate. A. refuse to read the bill B. not make a recommendation C. recommend quick passage of the bill D. recommend a televised debate on the bill
In some rare cases with controversial bills, committee members will not make a recommendation cause they fear any bad publicity that their suggestions or views on the bill could generate. So, option B is the right choice.
In some rare cases with controversial bills, committee members may choose option B: not make a recommendation because they fear the potential negative publicity that their suggestions or views on the bill could generate.
Committee members are responsible for reviewing and evaluating proposed bills.When faced with a controversial bill, committee members may anticipate public backlash or criticism due to the sensitive nature of the bill.To avoid any negative publicity or potential backlash, committee members may opt not to make a recommendation on the bill.By refraining from taking a stance or offering a recommendation, committee members can avoid being associated with a potentially contentious or unpopular decision.This approach allows them to protect their public image and avoid potential repercussions from their constituents or interest groups.By not making a recommendation, committee members can effectively distance themselves from the controversial aspects of the bill and minimize the risk of facing public scrutiny or backlash.Overall, committee members may choose not to make a recommendation on a controversial bill out of fear of generating negative publicity and its potential consequences.
The right answer is option B. not make a recommendation
For more such question on committee
https://brainly.com/question/12013157
#SPJ8
Should Alexander be considered great?
Answer:
points why he could be seen as a great man:
. Alexander Knew How to Crush a Rebellion
The Persian Empire had ruled the Mediterranean for two centuries when Alexander marched his 50,000-man army across the Hellespont to face King Darius III, who reportedly commanded a total Persian army of more than 2.5 million men.
The pivotal battle came near the Persian town of Gaugamela, where Darius had the land flattened and cleared to give advantage to his horse-drawn chariots. The Persians numbered 250,000 at Gaugamela, a seemingly insurmountable five-to-one advantage over the Macedonians, but Darius ended up playing right into Alexander's hand.
In what's known as a "pawn sacrifice," Alexander sent in thousands of troops to draw Darius' resources to the right flank. The sacrificed troops were able to distract Darius long enough for Alexander to launch a cavalry attack through a weak link in the centre of the Persian line. Darius turned and fled as the famed Macedonian cavalry, led by Alexander, steamrolled through the Persian defences.
After Darius was murdered by one of his cousins (and his head presented to Alexander), Alexander has crowned the new king of all of Persia, extending the Macedonian empire from modern-day Israel through Iraq, Iran and Afghanistan
He Was a Globalist
Alexander's conquests, not only of the Persian Empire but also Egypt and parts of India, launched the Hellenistic period, during which elements of Greek culture and politics were spread throughout the vast Macedonian Empire.
Alexander wasn't a Greek nationalist, intent on imposing Greek customs on every land he conquered. Instead, he folded foreign customs and religious beliefs into the fabric of his growing empire, winning the loyalty of his newly conquered subjects. The result was a Greek-speaking network of trade and military power that ruled the Mediterranean and Near East for three centuries.
Alexandria Became the Intellectual Capital of the World
Alexander founded more than 70 cities during his eight-year, 11,000-mile (17,703-kilometer) march throughout the Middle and Near East, but none compared to the grandeur that was Alexandria in Egypt.
Although Alexander chose the spot for the coastal city that bore his name, he didn't design it nor live long enough to see it flourish. After Alexander's death, the Macedonian Empire was chopped into three and ruled by each of his generals. Egypt fell under the control of Ptolemy and became known as the Ptolemaic Dynasty.
The Ptolemies spoke Macedonian Greek and filled Alexandria with Greek-style public buildings, including the famous library, which once held an estimated 700,000 scrolls, the greatest repository of knowledge in the ancient world.
The brilliant Greek mathematicians Euclid and Eratosthenes called Alexandria home, and the Ptolemaic navy commanded a huge fleet that pushed Alexandria's discoveries out into the wider world.
When Alexander died suddenly in Babylon from a fever at just 32 years old, the Ptolemies intercepted his funeral procession on the way back to Macedonia and built a glass sarcophagus in Alexandria where subjects could pay tribute to Alexander's mummy for centuries.
He May Have Been the World's First Action Hero
Fourteenth-century texts include the tale of Alexander exploring the ocean depths using a diving bell. But when Alexander settles on the ocean floor, his mistress double-crosses him, eloping with her lover and leaving him stranded in the deep.
For Carney, the popularity of the "Alexander Romance" reflects the enduring allure of this world-changing figure.
"Alexander grabbed people's imagination," says Carney. "That he was so young; that he wasn't defeated in a major battle; that things happened so quickly; he was such a risk taker and he went to all these places that seemed exotic."
I hope this was helpful
:)
What was the result of the French Revolution
Answer:
The French Revolution, which lasted from 1789 to 1799, had a profound impact on French society and the world at large. Some of the major results of the French Revolution include:
1. The end of the Bourbon monarchy: The French Revolution resulted in the overthrow of the Bourbon monarchy and the establishment of the First French Republic in 1792.
2. The Reign of Terror: During the Revolution, a period of violent political repression known as the Reign of Terror occurred, resulting in the execution of thousands of people, including King Louis XVI and his wife, Marie Antoinette.
3. The rise of Napoleon Bonaparte: The French Revolution paved the way for Napoleon Bonaparte, a military general who rose to power in the aftermath of the Revolution and eventually became Emperor of France.
4. The spread of revolutionary ideas: The French Revolution inspired similar movements for independence and democracy throughout Europe and the world, including in Latin America and the United States.
5. The establishment of a new political order: The French Revolution resulted in the adoption of a new constitution and the creation of a new political order that emphasized equality, liberty, and fraternity as core values.
Overall, the French Revolution marked a major turning point in European history, leading to significant political, social, and cultural changes that continued to shape the world in the centuries that followed.
Answer:
There is the French Revolution of 1789, which brought down the Monarchy and the ancien régime — and resulted in the beheading of King Louis XVI and his famous wife, Marie Antoinette. The Revolution lasted until 1792 at which point the National Assembly abolished the monarchy and declared the First Republic (1792-1799.)
Why did the colonies resist Britain’s attempts to reorganize its
North American colonial empire?
The colonies resisted Britain's attempts to reorganize its North American colonial empire primarily due to the following reasons: taxation without representation, limitations on self-governance, and perceived infringement on individual rights.
The colonies opposed Britain's efforts because they believed that taxation without representation violated their rights as English subjects. Measures like the Stamp Act, Townsend Acts, and the Tea Act imposed taxes on the colonists without their consent, leading to widespread protests and resistance. Additionally, the colonies resented the imposition of stricter British control through acts like the Intolerable Acts, which limited self-governance and established military rule in response to colonial unrest.
These actions were seen as undermining the rights and freedoms that the colonists believed they were entitled to as British subjects. The resistance to British reorganization reflected a desire for greater autonomy, representation, and the preservation of their individual rights and liberties.
To know more about colonies , click here.
https://brainly.com/question/20463235
#SPJ4
How did enlightment philosphers influence the founding fathers of american government
A: They provided the religous basis for representative democracy.
B: They formed new ideas on monarchy and the role of the king in government
C: Because Enlightment philosophers advocated for the absolute power of kings, the Founding Fathers sought to ensure that America remained loyal to the british crown.
D: They provided the ideas of natural rights, government by consent, and seperation of powers, which promote the greatest possible liberty for the people
Answer:
D: They provided the ideas of natural rights, government by consent, and separation of powers, which promote the greatest possible liberty for the people.
The correct answer is D. Enlightenment philosophers had a significant influence on the Founding Fathers of American government. The Founding Fathers, such as Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, and Benjamin Franklin, were heavily influenced by Enlightenment thinkers like John Locke, Montesquieu, and Voltaire.
These philosophers introduced new ideas and concepts that shaped the foundation of American government. They emphasized the importance of natural rights, including the rights to life, liberty, and property, which they believed were inherent to all individuals. This concept of natural rights provided the basis for the protection of individual freedoms and became a central tenet of the American political system.
Enlightenment philosophers also advocated for the idea of government by consent, stating that legitimate political authority derives from the consent of the governed. This concept challenged the traditional notion of divine right monarchy and formed the basis for the idea of popular sovereignty in the United States. The Founding Fathers incorporated this principle into the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution, ensuring that the government's power ultimately rests with the people.
Furthermore, Enlightenment thinkers introduced the concept of the separation of powers, which advocated for dividing governmental authority among different branches to prevent concentration of power and safeguard against tyranny. This principle was incorporated into the design of the American system of government, with the establishment of separate branches—the legislative, executive, and judicial—each with its own powers and responsibilities.
In summary, the ideas put forth by Enlightenment philosophers, such as natural rights, government by consent, and the separation of powers, greatly influenced the Founding Fathers in shaping the American system of government to promote the greatest possible liberty for the people.
An imperialist country using indirect rule in an African colony would most likely enact which policy? A. Outlawing local religions and forcing conquered people to conver to Christianity B. Allowing a local governor to oversee the construction of new infrastructure C. Offering equal treatment to all colonial citizens regardless of ethnicity D. Removing all non-European officials from positions of authority
An imperialist country using indirect rule in an African colony would most likely enact policy option B. which involves allowing a local governor to oversee the construction of new infrastructure.
Indirect rule is a method of colonial administration where the imperial power delegates authority to local indigenous leaders or institutions. This approach aims to maintain the existing social and political structures within the colony while exerting indirect control and influence.
By allowing a local governor to oversee infrastructure construction, the imperialist country demonstrates a willingness to utilize existing indigenous systems and institutions. This approach can serve multiple purposes. First, it helps maintain stability and continuity by preserving local governance structures and power dynamics.
Second, it fosters a sense of legitimacy and acceptance among the local population, as they see their own leaders playing a role in the development and improvement of their communities. The indirect rule also provides certain benefits to the imperial power. It allows for a more cost-effective method of administration, as local leaders can handle day-to-day governance, reducing the need for a large imperial bureaucracy.
It can also serve as a means of co-optation, whereby the indigenous elite becomes collaborators with the colonial power, helping to maintain control and stability. While the indirect rule may involve some degree of cultural and religious influence, such as the introduction of Christian missionaries or education, it typically aims to preserve local customs and traditions to a certain extent. Therefore, the correct answer is option B.
know more about infrastructure here:
https://brainly.com/question/869476
#SPJ8
What act of U.S. expansion was the direct result of Matthew Perry’s naval journey to Japan?
Matthew Perry's naval journey to Japan directly resulted in the signing of the Treaty of Kanagawa, which opened Japan to U.S. expansion and initiated a new era of international engagement for Japan.
The direct result of Matthew Perry's naval journey to Japan was the signing of the Treaty of Kanagawa in 1854. This treaty marked a significant act of U.S. expansion and opened the door to increased trade and diplomatic relations between the United States and Japan.Perry's naval expedition was aimed at forcibly opening Japan to foreign trade, specifically to secure provisions and facilities for American ships. His display of military power and modern technology convinced the Japanese government to negotiate. The Treaty of Kanagawa, signed between the United States and Japan, allowed American ships to enter Japanese ports, established consular relations, and provided for the safety and protection of American sailors and shipwrecked personnel.This act of U.S. expansion not only facilitated trade and diplomatic ties between the two countries but also had far-reaching consequences. It encouraged other Western powers to pursue similar treaties with Japan, leading to the end of Japan's policy of isolation and setting the stage for Japan's rapid modernization and transformation into a major world power. Matthew Perry's naval journey to Japan directly resulted in the signing of the Treaty of Kanagawa, which opened Japan to U.S. expansion and initiated a new era of international engagement for Japan.For more such questions on Japan
https://brainly.com/question/510537
#SPJ8
has any musician become a politician?
Answer:
Yes
Explanation: Clay Aiken is a musician he is running for Congress of north carolina for the second time (its also his hometown)
The implications of the Civil Rights Movement include all EXCEPT
- racist practices and policies ending long before the 1960s Civil Rights Movement
- call for the end of sterilization of Black, Indian, and Mexican women
- demand the end of Euro-centric curriculum
- end of legal racist practices and policies
The implications of the Civil Rights Movement include all except the call for the end of sterilization of Black, Indian, and Mexican women. Thus, option B is correct.
The civil rights movement is the result of more than 400 years of American history, during which the social, economic, and political advancement of the country was largely influenced by slavery, racism, white supremacy, and discrimination.
Despite a constitution that initially tolerated slavery and only counted those who were enslaved as three-fifths of the country's free population, the pursuit of civil rights for Black Americans was also motivated by the traditional promise of American democracy and by the Declaration of Independence's assumption of everyone's equality and unalienable right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
Learn more about the civil rights movement here:
https://brainly.com/question/32042116
#SPJ4
Contrast the characters in the story. Tell what pandora and Epi do and say that show how they are different
Pandora's cautiousness contrasts with Epi's impulsiveness, evident in their actions and dialogue in the story Pandora's Box.
In the story of Pandora's Box, the characters Pandora and Epi demonstrate their differences through their actions and dialogue.Pandora is depicted as a curious and cautious character. Her actions showcase her curiosity as she is tempted to open the box despite being warned about its consequences. However, she hesitates and questions the decision, showing her cautious nature. In her dialogue, Pandora expresses her concerns and seeks reassurance from others, reflecting her thoughtful and careful approach to situations.On the other hand, Epi is portrayed as a mischievous and impulsive character. His actions exhibit his impulsiveness as he encourages Pandora to open the box, disregarding the potential consequences. Epi's dialogue is filled with excitement and a desire for adventure, emphasizing his impulsive nature and willingness to take risks.Through their contrasting actions and dialogue, Pandora and Epi highlight their different personalities and approaches to the situation. Pandora's cautiousness and reluctance contrast with Epi's impulsive and adventurous nature, creating tension and conflict in the story.The complete question should be In the story pandora box , how do the characters Pandora and Epi demonstrate their differences through their actions and dialogueFor more questions on Pandora's Box
https://brainly.com/question/26493831
#SPJ8
Where did the last president go for an informal Native American inauguration? a. Titicaca b. Tihuanaco c. Sucre d. Santa Cruz
Answer:
The correct answer is option B, Tihuanaco
Explanation:
President Evo Morales had an informal inauguration and took the oath in an important ancestral and archeological place called Tiwanaku, next to a large and beautiful lake 12,500 feet above sea level.
the brutal attack by law enforcement officers against peaceful demonstrators in selma, alabama, became known as
During Moses’ call account(s) (Exod 3:1-4:30), who does God
determine will be Moses’ substitute or mouthpiece?
God determines that Aaron will be Moses' substitute or mouthpiece during Moses' call account(s) in Exodus 3:1-4:30.
In Exodus 3:1-4:30, when Moses encounters God at the burning bush and receives his call to lead the Israelites out of Egypt, he expresses concerns about his ability to speak persuasively. Moses tells God that he is not eloquent and asks God to send someone else in his place.
In response, God assures Moses that He will be with his mouth and teach him what to say. However, recognizing Moses' reluctance and his need for assistance, God appoints Moses' brother, Aaron, as his spokesperson. God tells Moses that Aaron will speak to the people on his behalf, acting as his mouthpiece. This arrangement ensures effective communication between Moses and the Israelites during their liberation from Egypt.
To know more about Exodus, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/29760666
#SPJ4
Hi, I'm writing a book summary on Michael Roberto's book, on Why great leaders don't take yes for an answer: Managing for conflict and consensus. Can you please help me ans this question as I need to write about it and extrapolate from other authors as well,
1-Convergence and Divergence within the book.
Thank you.
In Michael Roberto's book, "Why Great Leaders Don't Take Yes for an Answer: Managing for Conflict and Consensus," the concepts of convergence and divergence play essential roles in understanding effective leadership and decision-making processes.
Convergence refers to the process of finding common ground and reaching agreement among team members or stakeholders. It involves bringing diverse perspectives and opinions together to work towards a shared goal or solution.
The divergence highlights the significance of exploring different viewpoints and encouraging dissent. It involves allowing for healthy disagreement and debate among team members to uncover new ideas, challenge assumptions, and avoid groupthink.
Roberto's book stresses the delicate balance between convergence and divergence. While convergence is essential for reaching consensus and moving forward, divergence is necessary for effective problem-solving and decision-making.
Learn more about Michael Roberto's book here:
https://brainly.com/question/32736118
#SPJ4
Artillery was the weapon that killed the most soldiers in Europe during the First World War. True False
Answer:
Artillery was the most destructive weapon on the Western Front. in the western front, artillery was the biggest killer, responsible for “two-thirds of all deaths and injuries
According to the excerpt, lynching was used in the U.S. to:
intimidate African Americans.
resist "negro domination."
prevent African Americans from voting.
All of these choices are correct.
Which of the following best describes how the colonies justified seeking independence?
Answer:
Colonial taxes imposed by the British were too high.
Explanation:
Line graph showing British trade with China in millions of pounds from 1815 to 1845. Exports to China go from 6 million pounds in 1815 to 10 million pounds in 1845. Imports from China go from 13 million pounds in 1815 to 17 million pounds in 1845.
In 1839, the British became more imperialistic in China by declaring war and forcing the Chinese to sign trade agreements.
What was the effect of this action?
Imports increased, but exports declined.
Exports increased, but imports declined.
Both imports and exports declined.
Both imports and exports increased.
Answer:
The effect of the British declaring war and forcing China to sign trade agreements in 1839 was:
Both imports and exports increased.
Based on the line graph showing British trade with China from 1815 to 1845, we see:
- Exports to China (things Britain sold to China) increased from 6 million pounds in 1815 to 10 million pounds in 1845.
- Imports from China (things Britain bought from China) increased from 13 million pounds in 1815 to 17 million pounds in 1845.
So after the British became more Imperialistic and aggressive in China in 1839 by declaring war and imposing trade agreements, both British exports to China and imports from China continued to increase. This suggests the intervention and forced trade agreements opened up more trade opportunities that benefited both sides.
