с ex = (x)+ +! (x),t 51 нит

Bernoulli's equation is derived from the principle of conservation of energy for fluid flow. It states that the sum of the pressure energy, kinetic energy, and potential energy per unit volume of a fluid remains constant along a streamline.

To derive Bernoulli's equation, we start with the principle of conservation of energy. We assume steady, incompressible, and frictionless flow, neglecting any heat transfer.

Consider two points along a streamline in a fluid flow: point 1 and point 2. The equation can be written as P₁ + ½ρV₁² + ρgh₁ = P₂ + ½ρV₂² + ρgh₂, where P₁ and P₂ are the pressures, V₁ and V₂ are the velocities, ρ is the density of the fluid, g is the acceleration due to gravity, and h₁ and h₂ are the heights above a reference level.

This equation shows that the total mechanical energy per unit volume, consisting of pressure energy, kinetic energy, and potential energy, remains constant along the streamline. As the fluid moves from one point to another, changes in pressure, velocity, and height result in a redistribution of energy.

Bernoulli's equation is widely used in various engineering applications to analyze and design piping systems, as it provides insights into the behavior of fluid flow and pressure distribution.

Know more about Bernoulli's equation here:

https://brainly.com/question/29865910

#SPJ11

The solution is:

∫7.59​f(x)dx = 2 and

∫97.5​[2f(x)−8]dx = 8.

Use the properties of integrals to determine the value of the remaining integrals.

∫(6 to 10.5) f(x) dx = ∫(6 to 9) f(x) dx + ∫(9 to 10.5) f(x) dx

We are given that ∫(6 to 9) f(x) dx = 2 and

∫(9 to 10.5) f(x) dx = 10, so substituting these values, we have:

∫(6 to 10.5) f(x) dx = 2 + 10

= 12

∫(7 to 9) f(x) dx = ∫(6 to 10.5) f(x) dx - ∫(6 to 7) f(x) dx

Since ∫(6 to 10.5) f(x) dx = 12 and

∫(6 to 7) f(x) dx = 2, we can calculate:

∫(7 to 9) f(x) dx = 12 - 2

= 10

∫(7.5 to 9) f(x) dx = ∫(7 to 9) f(x) dx - ∫(7 to 7.5) f(x) dx

Since ∫(7 to 9) f(x) dx = 10 and

∫(7 to 7.5) f(x) dx = 8, we can calculate:

∫(7.5 to 9) f(x) dx = 10 - 8 = 2

∫(7.5 to 9) f(x) dx represents the integral of f(x) from x = 7.5 to x = 9, and its value is 2.

∫(9 to 7.5) [2f(x) - 8] dx = 2∫(9 to 7.5) f(x) dx - 8∫(9 to 7.5) dx

Since ∫(9 to 7.5) f(x) dx = -∫(7.5 to 9) f(x) dx

= -2, and

∫(9 to 7.5) dx = -∫(7.5 to 9) dx

= -1.5, we can calculate:

∫(9 to 7.5) [2f(x) - 8] dx = 2(-2) - 8(-1.5)

= -4 + 12

= 8

Therefore, ∫(7.59) f(x) dx = 2 and

∫(9.75) [2f(x) - 8] dx = 8.

To know more about Integration, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/33060603

#SPJ11

To determine the number of hours of bike use per dollar at Keller's Bike Rentals, we can calculate the reciprocal of the cost per hour. We cannot determine the exact value without accurate information.

(a) Let's assume the cost per hour is C dollars. The number of hours of bike use per dollar is given by 1/C. Therefore, if we want to find the number of hours of bike use per dollar, we need to compute 1/C. Since the cost per hour is not specified in the question, we cannot provide a specific value without that information.

(b) To find the number of minutes Latoya takes per mile, we can calculate the reciprocal of her running speed. Let's assume her running speed is S miles per minute. The number of minutes she takes per mile is given by 1/S. Therefore, if we want to find the number of minutes per mile, we need to compute 1/S. Since Latoya's running speed is not provided in the question, we cannot determine the exact value without that information.

To learn more about reciprocal click here : brainly.com/question/15590281

#SPJ11

Part 1: The chain rule of differentiation is required here because y is also a function of x, = 0

when s = -1 and t = 2.

Part2: Find and use the chain rule and evaluate for the given point, w' = -9 sin(1/2) cos(1/2) - 6 cos(1/2) at the point where s = 3 and t = 1/2.

1. w = y³ – 3x²,

x = es,

y = e' at the point where s = -1, and t = 2

First, we need to find dw/ds and dw/dt, and substitute s = -1 and t = 2.

The chain rule of differentiation is required here because y is also a function of x.

dw/ds = dw/dy × dy/dx × dx/ds dw/ds

= (3y²) × e^(2s) × 1

= 3e^(2s)y² dw/dt

= dw/dy × dy/dx × dx/dt dw/dt

= (3y²) × e^(2s) × 0

= 0 w' = dw/ds × ds/dt + dw/dt w'

= 3e^(2s)y² × (0) + 0

= 0

when s = -1 and t = 2.

Therefore, w = 0 when s = -1 and t = 2.

2. w = x² - y²,

x = s cos(t),

y = s sin(t) at the point where s = 3 and t = 1/2.

dw/ds = dw/dx × dx/ds + dw/dy × dy/ds dw/ds

= (2x) × cos(t) + (-2y) × sin(t) dw/ds

= 2(s cos(t)) × cos(t) + (-2s sin(t)) × sin(t) dw/ds

= 2(3 cos(1/2)) × cos(1/2) + (-2 × 3 sin(1/2)) × sin(1/2) dw/ds

= 3(2 cos²(1/2)) - 6 sin²(1/2) dw/dt

= dw/dx × dx/dt + dw/dy × dy/dt dw/dt

= (2x) × (-s sin(t)) + (-2y) × s cos(t) dw/dt

= 2(3 cos(1/2)) × (-3 sin(1/2)) + (-2 × 3 sin(1/2)) × 3 cos(1/2) dw/dt

= -18 sin(1/2) cos(1/2) - 18 sin(1/2) cos(1/2)

= -36 sin(1/2) cos(1/2)w'

= dw/ds × ds/dt + dw/dt w'

= (3 cos(1/2) - 3 sin(1/2)) × (-3 sin(1/2)) + (-6 sin²(1/2) - 6 cos²(1/2)) × cos(1/2) w'

= -9 sin(1/2) cos(1/2) - 6 cos(1/2)

when s = 3 and t = 1/2.

Therefore, w' = -9 sin(1/2) cos(1/2) - 6 cos(1/2) at the point where s = 3 and t = 1/2.

To know more about chain rule visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31585086

#SPJ11

The absolute maximum value of f(x) on the interval [0, 4] is 168, at x = -3, and the absolute minimum value is -198, at x = 3.

To find the absolute maximum and absolute minimum values of the function f(x) = 3 + 54x - 2x³ on the interval [0, 4], we need to evaluate the function at its critical points and endpoints.

Step 1: Find the critical points by taking the derivative of f(x) and setting it equal to zero:

f'(x) = 54 - 6x²

Setting f'(x) = 0 and solving for x:

54 - 6x² = 0

6x² = 54

x² = 9

x = ±3

So, we have two critical points:

x = -3 and

x = 3.

Step 2: Evaluate the function at the critical points and endpoints:

f(0) = 3 + 54(0) - 2(0)³

= 3

f(4) = 3 + 54(4) - 2(4)³

= -125

Step 3: Compare the values obtained to determine the absolute maximum and minimum:

The function f(x) is continuous on the closed interval [0, 4]. Therefore, the absolute maximum and minimum values will occur at the critical points or the endpoints.

f(0) = 3

f(4) = -125

f(-3) = 168

f(3) = -198

Therefore, the absolute maximum value of f(x) on the interval [0, 4] is 168, which occurs at x = -3, and the absolute minimum value is -198, which occurs at x = 3.

To know more about absolute value, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/15604514

#SPJ11

Rounded to the appropriate number of significant figures, the answer is 7.35×[tex]10^(-2)[/tex] km. To express it in scientific notation, we can write it as:
7.35×[tex]10^(-2)[/tex] km = 7.35×[tex]10^(-2)[/tex] kmTherefore, the evaluated expression is 7.35×[tex]10^(-2)[/tex] km.

The given expression [(4.20241×[tex]10^(-8)[/tex] km/s + 3.4900×[tex]10^(-7)[/tex] km/s) × 1.88×[tex]10^(5)[/tex] s] represents a multiplication calculation. To evaluate the expression, we substitute the given values into the equation and perform the necessary calculations. The final answer is expressed in scientific notation, rounded to the appropriate number of significant figures, and includes the correct units.
To evaluate the expression [(4.20241×[tex]10^(-8)[/tex] km/s + 3.4900×[tex]10^(-7)[/tex] km/s) × 1.88×[tex]10^5[/tex] s],

we first perform the addition inside the parentheses:
4.20241×[tex]10^(-8)[/tex] km/s + 3.4900×[tex]10^(-7)[/tex] km/s = 3.91024×[tex]10^(-7)[/tex] km/s
Now we can rewrite the expression as:
(3.91024×[tex]10^(-7)[/tex] km/s) × (1.88×[tex]10^(5)[/tex] s)
Performing the multiplication:
(3.91024×[tex]10^(-7)[/tex]km/s) × (1.88×[tex]10^5[/tex] s) = 7.3523072×[tex]10^(-2)[/tex] km
Rounded to the appropriate number of significant figures, the answer is 7.35×[tex]10^(-2)[/tex] km. To express it in scientific notation, we can write it as:
7.35×[tex]10^(-2)[/tex]km = 7.35×[tex]10^(-2)[/tex] km
Therefore, the evaluated expression is 7.35×[tex]10^(-2)[/tex] km.

Learn more about multiplication here:

https://brainly.com/question/10476152

#SPJ11

Sanjay’s statement that if a line has a slope of zero, then it never touches the x-axis is incorrect.

The line y = 2 is a good example to prove it. It has a slope of zero and passes through the x-axis.

An equation in slope-intercept form for a line can be written as y = mx + b, where m is the slope of the line, and b is the y-intercept. Since the slope of the line is zero, this implies that the line is horizontal. This means that the line is parallel to the x-axis, and its y-coordinate doesn't change. Therefore, a horizontal line always intercepts the y-axis and x-axis.

For more questions on: slope

https://brainly.com/question/16949303

#SPJ8        

Using the Integral Test, the given sequence can be found to converge

The Integral Test can be used to determine if the series converges or diverges. We can use the following integral to check if the series satisfies the conditions of the Integral Test.

Let's find out whether or not the given series converges or diverges using the Integral Test and the following integral below:

∫ [1, ∞] 5/(x² + 4) dx

Integrating this, we get:

∫ [1, ∞] 5/(x² + 4) dx= 5 tan⁻¹(x/2)|[1, ∞]

= (5/2) * π/2 - (5/2) * tan⁻¹(1/2)

As x approaches infinity, tan⁻¹ (x/2) approaches π/2, which gives us:

(5/2) * π/2 - (5/2) * tan⁻¹(1/2)

= (5/4) * π - (5/2) * tan⁻¹ (1/2)

Using the Integral Test conditions:

If ∫ [1, ∞] f(x) dx converges, then ∑ f(x) from n = 1 to ∞ converges.

If ∫ [1, ∞] f(x) dx diverges, then ∑ f(x) from n = 1 to ∞ diverges.

Since our integral evaluates to a finite number, (5/4) * π - (5/2) * arctan(1/2), we can conclude that the series also converges.

The Integral Test allows you to determine whether a sequence converges or diverges.

To be specific, if f(x) is continuous, positive, and decreasing on the interval (n, ∞), and the series ∑f(n) from n = 1 to ∞ can be represented as an integral of the form ∫ [1, ∞] f(x) dx,

then ∑f(n) from n = 1 to ∞  will converge if the integral converges.

The integral converges, as can be seen from the evaluation of the Integral Test, which is

(5/4) * π - (5/2) * tan⁻¹ (1/2).

The given sequence, therefore, also converges.

Using the Integral Test, the given sequence can be found to converge.

To know more about the integral test :

https://brainly.com/question/31033808

#SPJ11

The spread of a normal distribution is determined by its standard deviation. A larger standard deviation indicates a wider spread of values comparing the standard deviations, option c has the largest standard deviation of 3.

Looking at the given options:

a. Mean = 3, Standard Deviation = 2

b. Mean = 2, Standard Deviation = 1

c. Mean = 1, Standard Deviation = 3

d. Mean = 0, Standard Deviation = 2

Therefore, the normal distribution with a mean of 1 and a standard deviation of 3 has the widest spread among the given options.  So, the correct answer is option c.

Learn more about normal distribution here: brainly.com/question/16310576

#SPJ11

So, the inverse Laplace transform of the given function is sin(2t)/2.

To find the inverse Laplace transform of the function e(-s)/(s² + 4), we can refer to the table of Laplace transforms.

From the table, we see that the Laplace transform of eat is 1/(s - a).

So, applying this property, we can rewrite the given function as:

e(-s)/(s² + 4) = 1/(s² + 4) * e^(-s)

Now, we need to find the inverse Laplace transform of 1/(s² + 4).

Again referring to the table, we see that the inverse Laplace transform of 1/(s² + a²) is sin(at)/a.

Therefore, the inverse Laplace transform of 1/(s² + 4) is sin(2t)/2.

Putting it all together, the inverse Laplace transform of e(-s)/(s² + 4) is:

L⁻¹{e(-s)/(s² + 4)} = L⁻¹{1/(s² + 4)} * L⁻¹{e^(-s)}
                         = sin(2t)/2 * 1
                         = sin(2t)/2

So, the inverse Laplace transform of the given function is sin(2t)/2.
To know more about Laplace transform visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31481915

#SPJ11

The response at the control valve in the water return pipeline will be to increase the opening to allow the water level in the separator to return to the setpoint of 35.0%.

Here is a step-by-step explanation:

1. The 3-phase separator is operating at a steady state with the setpoint of the water level in the separator at 35.0%.
2. Both the feed and return flow rate of water are at 0.30 m3/hour.
3. The water feed flow rate is increased to 0.40 m3/hour.
4. Since the water feed flow rate has increased, the water level in the separator will also increase.
5. To maintain the setpoint of 35.0% for the water level in the separator, the control valve in the water return pipeline will respond by increasing its opening.
6. By increasing the opening of the control valve, more water will be allowed to flow out of the separator, thereby reducing the water level and bringing it back to the setpoint of 35.0%.

In summary, when the water feed flow rate is increased, the control valve in the water return pipeline will respond by increasing its opening to allow the water level in the separator to return to the setpoint of 35.0%.

To know more about control valve :

https://brainly.com/question/32359094

#SPJ11

the initial concentrations of o-phen in the three equilibrium mixtures would be 0.00006 M, 0.00012 M, and 0.00018 M, respectively.

To find the initial concentration of the reactant o-phen, you can use the information given in the question. The equation for the reaction is Fe2+ + 3 o-phen = Fe(o-phen)3, and the stock iron solution to dilute from has a concentration of 1x10^-4 M Fe2+.

Since the stoichiometric ratio between Fe2+ and o-phen is 1:3, for every 1 mole of Fe2+, we need 3 moles of o-phen to form Fe(o-phen)3.

To make the equilibrium mixtures, you need to choose three different concentrations of Fe2+ within the range of 0.00001-0.00008 M. Let's say you choose concentrations of 0.00002 M, 0.00004 M, and 0.00006 M for your three mixtures.

To calculate the initial concentration of o-phen for each mixture, you need to use the stoichiometric ratio. Since the ratio is 1:3, for every 0.00002 M of Fe2+, you will need 3 times that amount of o-phen. Therefore, the initial concentration of o-phen in the first mixture would be 0.00002 M * 3 = 0.00006 M.

Similarly, for the second mixture, the initial concentration of o-phen would be 0.00004 M * 3 = 0.00012 M, and for the third mixture, it would be 0.00006 M * 3 = 0.00018 M.

So, the initial concentrations of o-phen in the three equilibrium mixtures would be 0.00006 M, 0.00012 M, and 0.00018 M, respectively.

Remember that this calculation is based on the stoichiometric ratio between Fe2+ and o-phen. By choosing different concentrations of Fe2+, you can determine the corresponding initial concentrations of o-phen in each equilibrium mixture.

Know more about stoichiometric ratio here:

https://brainly.com/question/6907332

#SPJ11

The equation has two real-number roots: x = -1 and x = 0.

To find the real-number roots of the equation, we set the equation equal to zero and solve for x:

log(1 - 3x) = 1 + 3x

To simplify the equation, we can rewrite it using properties of logarithms:

1 - 3x = 10^(1 + 3x)

Next, we can rewrite 10^(1 + 3x) as 10 * 10^(3x):

1 - 3x = 10 * 10^(3x)

Now, let's simplify further by dividing both sides by 10:

(1 - 3x) / 10 = 10^(3x)

Since the base of the exponential function is 10, we can rewrite the equation in exponential form:

10^((1 - 3x) / 10) = 10^(3x)

Now, we can equate the exponents on both sides:

(1 - 3x) / 10 = 3x

To eliminate the fraction, we can multiply both sides of the equation by 10:

1 - 3x = 30x

Next, let's move all terms to one side of the equation:

30x + 3x - 1 = 0

Combining like terms:

33x - 1 = 0

Adding 1 to both sides:

33x = 1

Finally, divide both sides by 33:

x = 1/33

So far, we have found one root, which is x = 1/33. To find the other root, we can substitute x = -1 into the original equation:

log(1 - 3(-1)) = 1 + 3(-1)

Simplifying:

log(1 + 3) = 1 - 3

Taking the antilogarithm:

1 + 3 = 10^(1 - 3)

4 = 10^(-2)

Since 10^(-2) = 1/100, we have:

4 = 1/100

This equation is not true, so x = -1 is not a solution.

Therefore, the equation has two real-number roots: x = -1 and x = 0.

The equation log(1 - 3x)/(1 + 3x) = x has two real-number roots, which are x = -1 and x = 0.

To know more about real-number roots visit

https://brainly.com/question/24147137

#SPJ11

To find the value of x when sin(x) is equal to cos(30°), we can use the trigonometric identity:

sin(x) = cos(90° - x)

Using this identity, we can rewrite the equation as:

cos(90° - x) = cos(30°)

For two angles to be equal, their cosine values must also be equal. Therefore, we have:

90° - x = 30°

Subtracting 30° from both sides, we get

90° - 30° = x

To find the value of x, we need to determine the angle whose sine is equal to √3/2. This angle is 60 degrees, or π/3 radians. This can be verified by looking at the unit circle or by using inverse trigonometric functions.

Simplifying, we have:

60° = x

Therefore, the value of x that satisfies the equation sin(x) = cos(30°) is x = 60°.

Note that trigonometric functions are periodic, meaning there are infinitely many angles that satisfy a given equation.

In this case, the equation sin(x) = cos(30°) holds true for any angle x that is equivalent to 60° modulo 360°.

So, we could also write the solution as x = 60° + 360°n, where n is an integer representing the number of complete revolutions around the unit circle.

For more questions Trignometric:

https://brainly.com/question/13729598

#SPJ8

Answer:

132

Step-by-step explanation:

ada = 30

uche has 12 more than ada = 30 + 12 = 42

joy has twice as much as ada = 2 * 30 = 60

altogether they have = 30 + 42 + 60 = 132

Answer:

AD = 8

Step-by-step explanation:

CD is the perpendicular bisector of AB , then

AD = BD and is half of AB , so

AD = [tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex] × 16 = 8

The steady-state concentration of the harmful chemical in the air is 3.5 μg/m³.

To calculate the steady-state concentration of the harmful chemical, we need to consider the mass balance method. First, we determine the total emission rate of the harmful chemical. Each wood-burning stove emits 3 kg of wood per hour, and each kilogram of wood emits 1.4 mg of the harmful chemical. Therefore, the total emission rate is (10 stoves) x (3 kg/stove) x (1.4 mg/kg) = 42 mg/hr.

Next, we calculate the total removal rate of the harmful chemical. The harmful chemical converts to carbon dioxide with a reaction rate coefficient of 0.35/hr. Since the molecular weight of the harmful chemical is 30, the conversion rate to carbon dioxide is (42 mg/hr) x (1 g/1000 mg) x (1/30) x (1000/44) = 0.318 g/hr.

Finally, we determine the steady-state concentration by dividing the total removal rate by the fresh air flow rate. The fresh air flow rate is given as 1500 m³/hr. Converting the removal rate to μg/hr and dividing by the flow rate, we get (0.318 g/hr) x (1000 μg/g) / (1500 m³/hr) = 0.212 μg/m³. Rounding to the appropriate number of significant figures, the steady-state concentration is 3.5 μg/m³.

Know more about steady-state concentration here:

https://brainly.com/question/31647854

#SPJ11

To determine the "toughest" material on a stress-strain graph, you should look for the material with the largest area under the curve, not the highest modulus of elasticity.

On the stress-strain graph, the "toughest" material is determined by the area under the curve, specifically the stress-strain curve. The material with the largest area under the stress-strain curve is considered the toughest.

The area under the stress-strain curve represents the energy absorbed by the material during deformation. This energy absorption capability indicates the material's ability to withstand deformation without fracturing or breaking. The larger the area under the curve, the greater the energy absorbed and the tougher the material.

It's important to note that the modulus of elasticity, also known as Young's modulus, is a measure of a material's stiffness. It represents the slope of the linear elastic region of the stress-strain curve. While the modulus of elasticity provides information about a material's stiffness, it does not directly indicate the toughness of the material.

In summary, to determine the "toughest" material on a stress-strain graph, you should look for the material with the largest area under the curve, not the highest modulus of elasticity.

For more details of stress-strain :

https://brainly.com/question/13110518

#SPJ4

Mean and median of the given numbers The given numbers are 25, 18, 30, 18, 20, 19, 30, 16, 36, 24To find the mean, we sum up all the numbers and divide the sum by the total number of observations:

Mean = (25+18+30+18+20+19+30+16+36+24)/10 = 236/10 = 23.6 bicycles sold monthly ,

To find the median, we first need to arrange the numbers in order from smallest to largest:16, 18, 18, 19, 20, 24, 25, 30, 30, 36

Since there are 10 numbers, the median is the average of the two middle numbers.  

In this case, the middle numbers are 20 and 24,

So the median is:(20 + 24)/2 = 44/2 = 22 bicycles sold monthly.

So, the mean and median number of bicycles sold monthly are 23.6 and 22 respectively.  

to know more about observations visit :  

brainly.com/question/9679245

#SPJ11

The initial population is approximately 23.81 bacteria.

Given that, bacteria culture grows with a constant relative growth rate.

After 2 hours there are 400 bacteria and after 8 hours the count is 50,000. We have to find the initial population.

Let P(t) be the population at time t and P(0) be the initial population.

Since the growth rate is constant, we can use the formula:

P(t) = P(0) * e^(rt), where r is the constant relative growth rate.

To find r, we can use the information that the population grows from 400 to 50,000 over 8 hours.

P(8) = P(0) * e^(8r)50,000

= P(0) * e^(8r)

Also, P(2) = P(0) * e^(2r)

= 400

Taking the ratio of these two equations, we get:

50,000/400 = e^(8r) / e^(2r)125

= e^(6r)

Taking the natural logarithm of both sides, we get:

ln(125) = 6rln(e)

ln(125) = 6r

Therefore, r = ln(125)/6

Substituting this value of r into P(2) = P(0) * e^(2r)

= 400, we get:

400 = P(0) * e^(2(ln(125)/6))400

= P(0) * (125)^(1/3)

P(0) = 400 / (125)^(1/3)

P(0) = 23.81 (approx)

Therefore, the initial population is approximately 23.81 bacteria.

To know more about population visit:

https://brainly.com/question/15889243

#SPJ11

The percentage of the glass that remains empty is 34 percent.

A 330ml can of soda is poured into a 1 / 2 litres glass.

Therefore, the percentage of the glass that remains empty can be calculated as follows:

Hence,

330 ml = 0.33 litres

Therefore,

percentage of the glass that remains empty = 0.5 - 0.33 / 0.5 ×100

percentage of the glass that remains empty = 0.17 / 0.5 × 100

percentage of the glass that remains empty = 17 / 0.5

percentage of the glass that remains empty = 34%

learn more on percentage here: https://brainly.com/question/31940072

#SPJ1

The value of the given combination and permutation problem is
:Cxp*(1-p)*  is 0.2646.

When, n = 4, p = 0.3, x = 2.

To evaluate Cxp*(1-p)* , we need to find the values of C and x!.

As we know the formula for C is given as: C = nCx = (n!)/(x!(n−x)!)

Where, n = total number of items in the set

x = number of items to be chosen from the set.

Now, putting n = 4 and x = 2 in the formula, we get: C = 4C2 = (4!)/(2!(4−2)!) = 6

For x!, we have: x! = 2! = 2

Combining the values of C and x! in the expression Cxp*(1-p)*, we get:

Cxp*(1-p)* = 6(0.3)²(0.7)²

= 6(0.09)(0.49)

= 0.2646

Therefore, the answer is 0.2646.

To know more about Combination and permutation refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/11732255#

#SPJ11

The approximate distance from the airplane to the numbers at the beginning of the descent is 72800 feet.

We can use trigonometry to solve this problem. Let's draw a diagram:

  /|

 / | 4000 ft

/  |

/   | 9 degrees

-----

x ft

We can see that the angle between the horizontal and the line from the airplane to the numbers is 90 - 9 = 81 degrees. Therefore, we have:

tan(81) = 4000 / x

x = 4000 / tan(81)

Using a calculator, we get:

x ≈ 72821.5 ft

Rounding to the nearest 100 feet, we get:

x ≈ 72800 ft

Therefore, the approximate distance from the airplane to the numbers at the beginning of the descent is 72800 feet.

Learn more about number  from

https://brainly.com/question/27894163

#SPJ11

Answer:

90

Step-by-step explanation:

cylinders are 3 times the volume of a cone having the same height and diameter

30 times 3

a. The probability that a glass sheet is thicker than 3.25 mm can be calculated using the standard normal distribution table.

z = (x - μ)/σz = (3.25 - 3.20)/0.12 = 0.42

The corresponding probability from the z-table is 0.166 = 16.6%

Therefore, the probability that a glass sheet is thicker than 3.25 mm is 16.6%

.The probability that a glass sheet is thinner than 2.75 mm can be calculated using the standard normal distribution table.

z = (x - μ)/σz = (2.75 - 3.20)/0.12 = -3.75

The corresponding probability from the z-table is 0.0001Therefore, the probability that a glass sheet is thinner than 2.75 mm is 0.01%.

We need to find the value of c for which there is a 98% probability that a glass sheet has a thickness within the interval 3.00 - c, 3.00 + c

.Using the z-score formula, we have:z = (x - μ)/σFor the lower end of the interval, z = (3.00 - μ)/σ = -2.05For the upper end of the interval, z = (3.00 + μ)/σ = 2.05

From the standard normal distribution table, the corresponding probability for z = 2.05 is 0.9798

The total probability of the interval is 0.98, so the probability of the area outside the interval is:0.02 = 1 - 0.98

This area is divided equally between the two tails of the distribution, so the probability for each tail is:0.01 = 0.02/2

From the standard normal distribution table, the corresponding z-value for this probability is 2.33

Therefore, we have:2.33 = (c - 0)/0.12Solving for c, we get:c = 0.2796 or 0.28 (rounded to two decimal places).

Therefore, the value of c for which there is a 98% probability that a glass sheet has a thickness within the interval 3.00 - c, 3.00 + c is 0.28 mm.

We need to find the probability that four glass sheets placed one on top of another have a total thickness greater than 9.50 mm.

The total thickness of four glass sheets is the sum of the thicknesses of each sheet. If X is the thickness of one sheet, then the total thickness is Y = X1 + X2 + X3 + X4.

The mean and standard deviation of Y can be calculated as follows:Mean of Y: μY = μX1 + μX2 + μX3 + μX4 = 4(3.20) = 12.80 mm

Standard deviation of Y: σY = sqrt(σX1^2 + σX2^2 + σX3^2 + σX4^2) = sqrt(4(0.12)^2) = 0.24 mm

Using the standard normal distribution, we have:z = (9.50 - 12.80)/0.24 = -13.75

he corresponding probability from the z-table is approximately 0.

Therefore, the probability that four glass sheets placed one on top of another have a total thickness greater than 9.50 mm is very low, or approximately 0

We need to find the probability that eight glass sheets have an average thickness of less than 3.10 mm. If X is the thickness of one sheet,

then the average thickness of eight sheets is Y = (X1 + X2 + X3 + X4 + X5 + X6 + X7 + X8)/8. The mean and standard deviation of Y can be calculated as follows:

Mean of Y: μY = (μX1 + μX2 + μX3 + μX4 + μX5 + μX6 + μX7 + μX8)/8 = 8(3.20)/8 = 3.20 mm

Standard deviation of Y: σY = sqrt(σX1^2 + σX2^2 + σX3^2 + σX4^2 + σX5^2 + σX6^2 + σX7^2 + σX8^2)/8 = sqrt(8(0.12)^2)/8 = 0.0424 mm

Using the standard normal distribution, we have:z = (3.10 - 3.20)/0.0424 = -2.36

The corresponding probability from the z-table is approximately 0.0098.

Therefore, the probability that eight glass sheets have an average thickness of less than 3.10 mm is approximately 0.0098 or 0.98%.

to know more about total thickness visit :

brainly.com/question/16987142

#SPJ11

The next feasible solution for the given mathematical program, obtained using the Affine Scaling Search method with an initial point of x(0) = (0.1, 0.5, 0.3, 1, 3, 4.5), is x(1) = (0.85, 0.75, 1.05, 1, 3, 4.5).


To solve the given mathematical program using the Affine Scaling Search method, we start with the initial point x(0) = (0.1, 0.5, 0.3, 1, 3, 4.5) and aim to find the next feasible solution x(1). The objective is to maximize the objective function 3x₁ + x₂ + 3x₃.

To begin the Affine Scaling Search, we perform the following steps:

⇒ Initialize the scaling factor α = 0.5.

⇒ Calculate the current objective function value at x(0):

f(x(0)) = 3(0.1) + 0.5 + 3(0.3) = 1.8.

⇒ Calculate the gradient of the objective function at x(0):

∇f(x(0)) = [3, 1, 3, 0, 0, 0].

⇒ Calculate the infeasibility vector at x(0) by substituting x(0) into the equality constraints:

g(x(0)) = [2(0.1) + 0.5 + 0.3 + 1 - 2, 2(0.1) + 0.5 + 0.3 + 3 - 5, 2(0.1) + 0.5 + 0.3 + 4.5 - 6]

        = [-0.7, -1.1, -1.2].

⇒ Calculate the gradient of the infeasibility vector at x(0):

∇g(x(0)) = [2, 2, 2, 0, 0, 0].

⇒ Update the current point x(0) as follows:

x(0) = x(0) + α * (∇f(x(0)) / ∇g(x(0))) = (0.1, 0.5, 0.3, 1, 3, 4.5) + 0.5 * ([3, 1, 3, 0, 0, 0] / [2, 2, 2, 0, 0, 0])

    = (0.1, 0.5, 0.3, 1, 3, 4.5) + (0.75, 0.25, 0.75, 0, 0, 0)

    = (0.85, 0.75, 1.05, 1, 3, 4.5).

⇒ Check if the new point x(1) satisfies the equality constraints. If it does, we have found the next feasible solution; otherwise, repeat steps 2 to 6 until a feasible solution is obtained.

In this case, x(1) = (0.85, 0.75, 1.05, 1, 3, 4.5) satisfies the equality constraints, and we can proceed with further iterations if necessary.

To know more about Affine Scaling Search, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/29579850#

#SPJ11

a. 2+ (-8)

In the number line, the number 2 would start and the next jump would be of 8 steps leftwards. Then we would land on -6. Thus,2 + (-8) = -6

b. (-3)-(-10)

In this case, we would like to subtract -10 from -3. We know that subtracting a negative value is equivalent to adding its absolute value in the positive sense. That is,-3 - (-10) = -3 + 10 = 7

c. (-4) +7

In this case, we need to add -4 and 7. One way to do that is by making a charge field with 4 negative charges (represented by red circles) and 7 positive charges (represented by green circles). Then we can see that the charges would cancel and there would be 3 positive charges left. Thus,-4 + 7 = 3

d. (-11) + (-2)

In this case, we would like to add -2 to -11. To do this, we can start at -11 and then take 2 steps leftwards. This would land us on -13. Thus,-11 + (-2) = -13

f. (-9)-6

Here we would like to subtract 6 from -9. To do this, we can start at -9 and take 6 steps leftwards. This would land us on -15. Thus,-9 - 6 = -15

h. 3-(-1)

In this case, we would like to subtract -1 from 3. As we know, subtracting a negative value is equivalent to adding its absolute value in the positive sense. Thus,3 - (-1) = 3 + 1 = 4.

1. (-72)+(-12)

We can add -72 and -12 using the chip model. Here we can make 72 negative chips and 12 more negative chips and put them together. This would give us 84 negative chips in total. However, since these chips represent negative numbers, we can represent them by a single negative sign in front of 84. Thus,-72 + (-12) = -84.

k. (-4).(-7)

We can use the pattern for the multiplication of two negative numbers. We know that the product of two negative numbers is positive. Thus,(-4) x (-7) = 28

m. (-10) 2

Here we would like to divide -10 by 2. We can use the definition of division which is, dividing a number by another number is equivalent to multiplying it with the reciprocal of the number. Thus,-10 ÷ 2 = -10 x (1/2) = -5

j. 8+(-3)

In this case, we would like to add -3 to 8. We can use the number line and start at 8 and then take 3 steps leftwards. This would land us on 5. Thus,8 + (-3) = 5.

1. 6.3

Here, we don't need a model since it is a single number and we just need to write it as a negative number since it has a negative sign. Thus,6.3 = -6.3

n. (-20)+4

We can use the number line for this. We can start at -20 and then take 4 steps rightwards. This would land us on -16. Thus,-20 + 4 = -16.

Learn more about "number line":  https://brainly.com/question/24644930

#SPJ11

Answer:

142 degrees

Step-by-step explanation:

We know that a parallelogram interior angles all have to add up to 360 degrees.

Opposite angles are congruent, and we know that 2 angles must be acute (and congruent) and 2 angles must be obtuse (and congruent).

This means that 2 angles also have to be supplementary.

In this case,

JKG and KGH have to be supplementary, meaning we can write an equation:

180=38+x

subtract 38 from both sides

142=x

So, KGH is 142 degrees.

Hope this helps! :)

Answer:

12 cm

Step-by-step explanation:

We can find the height of the triangle by using the Pythagorean theorem.

a^2 + b^2 = c^2 where a and b are the legs and c is the hypotenuse

9^2 + h^2 = 15^2

81 + h^2 = 225

h^2 = 225-81

h^2=144

Take the square root of each side.

h = 12

We categorize the statements as;

To determine the statements, we have to take note of the following;

Learn more about counterexamples at: https://brainly.com/question/3637836

#SPJ4