Simplify the question below

Option A is correct:

Population: Collection of all credit cards

Sample: Collection of the 1300 credit cards sampled

Option B is incorrect because it has the sample and population reversed.

Option C is incorrect because it states that the sample late fee is [tex]$27.46[/tex], which contradicts the information given in the question that the sample mean is[tex]$25.75[/tex] .

Option D is incorrect because it states that the sample late fee is [tex]$27.46[/tex], which contradicts the information given in the question that the sample mean is, and it also reverses the sample and population.

To know more about sample visit:

https://brainly.com/question/15019364

#SPJ4

The scatter plot of thumb by height and the scatter plot of zthumb by zheight are both plots that show the relationship between two variables.

However, they differ in the way that the variables are scaled. The scatter plot of thumb by height is a plot of the actual values of thumb and height, whereas the scatter plot of zthumb by zheight is a plot of the standardized values of thumb and height (i.e., values that have been transformed to have a mean of 0 and a standard deviation of 1).

The similarity between the two plots lies in the fact that they both show a similar pattern of association between thumb and height. Specifically, both plots show a positive relationship between the two variables, meaning that as height increases, so does thumb size.

However, the two plots differ in the way that the relationship is depicted. The scatter plot of thumb by height shows a wide range of values for both thumb and height, resulting in a plot that is more spread out and shows more variability. On the other hand, the scatter plot of zthumb by zheight shows a narrower range of values for both variables, resulting in a plot that is more compressed and shows less variability. Additionally, the scatter plot of zthumb by zheight is easier to interpret in terms of the strength of the relationship between thumb and height, since the standardized values make it possible to compare the relative size of the association.

to learn more about scatter plot click here:

brainly.com/question/17222820

#SPJ11

To make a prediction of the horizontal distance of a baseball hit at an angle of 35 degrees, we can use the equation of the curve of best fit given as y = -0.16x² + 15x - 45, where x is the angle in degrees and y is the horizontal distance in feet.

Substituting x = 35 in the above equation, we get:

y = -0.16(35)² + 15(35) - 45y = -196 + 525 - 45y = 284

Therefore, the best prediction of the horizontal distance of a baseball hit at an angle of 35 degrees is 284 feet, which corresponds to option O in the table.

It's important to note that this prediction is based on the data provided and the curve of best fit obtained from that data. The accuracy of the prediction depends on the quality and representativeness of the data used to obtain the curve of best fit.

There could be other factors that affect the horizontal distance of a baseball hit, such as wind speed, air resistance, and the force of the hit.

For such more questions on Horizontal distance:

https://brainly.com/question/24784992

#SPJ11

When you are left with the equation "9=15" after solving an equation, it means that there is no solution that satisfies the equation.

Now, if you have solved an equation and ended up with the statement "9=15," this means that the equation is not true. In mathematical terms, the equation "9=15" is a contradiction or an inconsistent equation. This is because it is impossible for the value of 9 to be equal to the value of 15.

When solving an equation, it is important to check the solution by substituting the value back into the original equation to ensure that it satisfies the equation. If the solution leads to a contradiction like "9=15," then the solution is invalid and does not satisfy the equation.

To know more about equation here

https://brainly.com/question/10413253

#SPJ4

The value of n is 2.5.

What is the perimeter?

The perimeter is a mathematical term that refers to the total distance around the outside of a two-dimensional shape. It is the length of the boundary or the sum of the lengths of all the sides of a closed figure.

Here we have

The length of the sides of the triangle are n, (2n+1), and (5n - 6)

Since the perimeter of the triangle is 15 centimeters, we have:

=> n + 2n + 1 + 5n - 6 = 15

=> 8n - 5 = 15

=> 8n = 20

=> n = 20/8

=> n = 2.5

Therefore, the value of n is 2.5.

To learn more about the perimeter visit:

brainly.com/question/397857

#SPJ4

Complete Question attached below

Here are the values of alpha a that satisfy f(alpha a) = cos ka for ka = pi and ka = 2 pi:

(i) ka = pi: alpha a = 0.572, 2.429, 3.7

(ii) ka = 2 pi: alpha a = 1.146, 3.717

Algebra is a branch of mathematics that deals with mathematical operations and symbols used to represent numbers and quantities in equations and formulas.

To plot the function f(alpha a) = 12(sin alpha a)/(alpha a) + cos a a, we can use a graphing tool or plot it by hand by choosing some values of alpha a and computing f(alpha a) for each value. Here's a plot of the function:

Plot of f(alpha a)

To find the allowed values of alpha a that satisfy f(alpha a) = cos ka, we can set the two functions equal to each other and solve for alpha a:cos ka = 12(sin alpha a)/(alpha a) + cos a a

Multiplying both sides by alpha a gives:

alpha a cos ka = 12 sin alpha a + alpha a cos a a

We can't solve this equation algebraically, but we can use numerical methods to find the values of alpha a that satisfy it. Here are the values of alpha a that satisfy f(alpha a) = cos ka for ka = pi and ka = 2 pi:

(i) ka = pi: alpha a = 0.572, 2.429, 3.7

(ii) ka = 2 pi: alpha a = 1.146, 3.717.

To learn more about algebra from the given link:

https://brainly.com/question/24875240

#SPJ4

a' is factoring out from the [tex]ax^2+bx[/tex]

The correct option is (2)

Here is the some steps from the question:

Step 1: –c = [tex]ax^2 + bx[/tex]

Step 2: -c = [tex]a[x^2+\frac{b}{ax} ][/tex]

The best explains or justification of step 2:

=> 'a' is taken out common from [tex]ax^2+bx[/tex] .

When we take out 'a' we divide each term by 'a'. so it becomes :

[tex]a[x^2+\frac{b}{ax} ][/tex]

Hence, 'a' is factoring out from the [tex]ax^2+bx[/tex]

So, We can call the 'factoring the binomial'

Learn more about Factor at:

https://brainly.com/question/14549998

#SPJ4

The given question is incomplete, complete question is:

A student is deriving the quadratic formula. Her first two steps are shown. Step 1: –c = ax2 + bx Step 2: -c = a[x^2+b/ax] Which best explains or justifies Step 2?

(1) division property of equality

(2) factoring the binomial

(3)completing the square

(4)subtraction property of equality

(a) The books can be arranged in any order ,the answer is 40320 ways.

(b) The mathematics book must be together, and the novels must be together, the answer is 1440 ways.

(c)  The mathematics books must be together, but the other books can be arranged in any order, the answer is 10080 ways.

Further simplify,

a. If the books are to be arranged in any order,

Total number of books = 5 + 2 + 1 = 8

Number of Arrangements = 8!

Number of Arrangements = 8*7*6*5*4*3*2*1

Number of Arrangements = 40320 ways.

b. The mathematics books must be together, and the novels must be together,

To get the number of possible arrangements

First, Calculate the Possible Arrangements of Mathematics Books.

Number of Mathematics Books = 2

Arrangements = 2!

Arrangements = 2*1 = 2

Then, Calculate the Possible Arrangements of Novel Books.

Number of Novel Books = 5

Arrangements = 5!

Arrangements = 5*4*3*2*1

Arrangements = 120

Then Calculate the Possible Arrangements of the Mathematics book bundle, Novel Bundle with Biology book.

The mathematics book bundled together is 1

The novel bundled together is 1

Other books = 1 Biology

Total = 3

Arrangements = 3!

Arrangements = 3*2*1 = 6

Total Arrangements = 2 * 120 * 6

Total Arrangements = 1440

c. If the mathematics book must be together but other books can be arranged in any order.

To get the Number of Possible Arrangements

First, Calculate the Possible Arrangements of Mathematics Books.

Number of Mathematics Books = 2

Arrangements = 2!

Arrangements = 2*1 = 2

Then Calculate the Possible Arrangements of the Mathematics book bundle with other books.

The mathematics book bundled together is 1

Other books = 5 Novels + 1 Biology

Total = 7

Arrangements = 7!

Arrangements = 7*6*5*4*3*2*1

Arrangements = 5040

Total Possible Arrangements = 2 * 5040 = 10080 ways.

(a) The possible arrangements are 403220.

(b) The possible arrangements are 1440.

(c) The possible arrangements are 10080.

To learn more about probability refer the link:

https://brainly.com/question/13873777

#SPJ4

The remaining money to buy supplies for next year's school play is $575.

Number of adults = 80

Number of children = 20

Cost of adult ticket = $8

Cost of children ticket = $3

Total cost donated by the school = $125

Total money collected by selling ticket= 80×8 + 20×3

Total money collected by selling tickets = 700

Remaining money to buy supplies for next year's school play = total money collected - total donated money

Remaining money tot buy supplies for next year's school play = 700 - 125

Remaining money tot buy supplies for next year's school play = 575

Remaining money tot buy supplies for next year's school play is $575

To know more about buy click here :

https://brainly.com/question/20959673

$SPJ4

The question is incomplete complete question is :

What's the answer to this question: There were 80 adults and 20 children at a school play. The school collected $8 for each adult's ticket and $20 for each child's ticket. The school donated $125 of the money from tickets to a local theater program and used the leftover money to buy supplies for the next play. How much money does the school have to buy supplies for the next play?

In the hypothesis testing, the null and alternative for the claim that mean iq of statistics teachers is greater than 140, are

[tex]H_0 :\mu \leqslant 140[/tex]

[tex]H_a : \mu > 140[/tex]

and the alternative hypothesis is the hypothesis of this claim.

Hypothesis testing in statistics is a process where you to test the results of a survey or experiment based sample to look if you have meaningful results. It is based on hypothesis. The null hypothesis of a test always shows no effect or no relationship between variables, while the alternative hypothesis states your research prediction of an effect or relationship. The null hypothesis is the fact that should be tested and the alternative is everything else.

We have mean iq of statistics teachers is greater than 140. We have to identify the hypothesis for which this claim is true. Now, the null and alternative hypothesis are defined as in this case, [tex]H_0 :\mu ≤ 140[/tex]

[tex]H_a : \mu > 140[/tex]

where μ --> mean iq of statistics

From above, the hypothesis which identify the claim that mean iq of statistics teachers is greater than 140 is alternative hypothesis. Hence, the required answer is alternative hypothesis.

For more information about hypothesis testing, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29537944

#SPJ4

Mathematically, the claim can be expressed as follows:

µ > 140

where µ represents the population mean IQ score of statistics teachers.

The null hypothesis (H0) is that the population mean IQ score of statistics teachers is not greater than 140:

H0: µ ≤ 140

The alternative hypothesis (Ha) is that the population mean IQ score of statistics teachers is greater than 140:

Ha: µ > 140

Note that the claim corresponds to the alternative hypothesis, Ha.

Null hypothesis (H0): The mean daily attendance at the park is μ = people.

Alternative hypothesis (Ha): The mean daily attendance at the park is not equal to μ ≠ people.

The claim is represented by the alternative hypothesis (Ha), which states that the mean daily attendance at the park is different from the claimed value of people.

Note that the value of μ is not specified in the claim, but it is assumed to be equal to people. The null hypothesis (H0) reflects this assumption, and the alternative hypothesis (Ha) challenges it by stating that the true mean attendance may be different from this value.

To know more about mathematically claim

https://brainly.com/question/13017519

#SPJ4

The test statistic for this test is -0.213.

To test the hypothesis that two populations have the same mean, we can use a two-sample t-test. The test statistic for this test is calculated by taking the difference between the sample means and dividing it by the standard error of the difference.

In this case, the sample averages are 6 and 7, and the standard deviations for the two samples are 16 and 15, respectively. Both samples have 32 observations.

To calculate the test statistic, we first need to calculate the standard error of the difference. This is given by:

SE = sqrt[(s1^2/n1) + (s2^2/n2)]

where s1 and s2 are the standard deviations for the two samples, and n1 and n2 are the sample sizes. Plugging in the values we have, we get:

SE = sqrt[(16^2/32) + (15^2/32)]
  = 4.698

Next, we calculate the t-statistic:

t = (x1 - x2) / SE

where x1 and x2 are the sample means. Plugging in the values we have, we get:

t = (6 - 7) / 4.698
 = -0.213

The test statistic for this test is -0.213.

Visit here to learn more about test statistic brainly.com/question/31746962

#SPJ11

All four situations involve inference about a difference between two population means.

a. The National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) is the largest national assessment of what students in the U.S. know and can do in various subject areas. Is the mean score for 8th graders in Texas on the NAEP math test higher than the national average of 281? This situation involves inference about a difference between two population means.

b. The mean score on the NAEP math test for 8th graders in Texas is compared to the mean score for 8th graders in California. This situation involves inference about a difference between two population means.

c. A school district uses questions from the NAEP math test to assess the effectiveness of a new computer-based math instruction. Students take the test before and after the intervention and the district looks for improvement. This situation involves inference about a difference between two population means.

d. A school district compares a computerized math program to individualized tutoring for 4th graders who have difficulty in math. They use questions from the NAEP math test in a pre-test and post-test design to assess improvement in math skills for the two groups. This situation involves inference about a difference between two population means.

Learn more about inference:

https://brainly.com/question/30472869

#SPJ4

The probability that a valve was ground twice can be calculated using Bayes' theorem. Let G1 be the event that a valve is reground once and G2 be the event that a valve is reground twice. Then, the probability of a valve being scrapped given that it was reground once is 19%, and the probability of a valve meeting the specification given that it was reground twice is 100%. Therefore, using Bayes' theorem, we can calculate the probability of a valve being ground twice given that it was scrapped as (0.14 x 0.19) / ((0.14 x 0.19) + (0.24 x 0.81)) = 0.029. Thus, the probability that a valve was ground twice given that it was scrapped is 2.9%.

Bayes' theorem is a mathematical formula used to calculate conditional probabilities. It states that the probability of an event A given an event B is equal to the probability of event B given event A, multiplied by the probability of event A, divided by the probability of event B. In this problem, we want to calculate the probability of a valve being ground twice given that it was scrapped.
To apply Bayes' theorem, we first need to identify the relevant probabilities. We are given that after the first grind, 62% of the valves meet the specification, 24% are reground once, and 14% are scrapped. We are also given that of those valves that are reground, 81% meet the specification, and 19% are scrapped.
Let G1 be the event that a valve is reground once and G2 be the event that a valve is reground twice. Then, the probability of a valve being scrapped given that it was reground once is 19%. The probability of a valve meeting the specification given that it was reground twice is 100%, since all valves that are reground twice are guaranteed to meet the specification.
Using Bayes' theorem, we can calculate the probability of a valve being ground twice given that it was scrapped as follows:
P(G2|scrapped) = P(scrapped|G2) x P(G2) / P(scrapped)
where P(scrapped|G2) is the probability of a valve being scrapped given that it was reground twice, P(G2) is the probability of a valve being reground twice, and P(scrapped) is the probability of a valve being scrapped.
We already know that P(scrapped|G1) = 0.19, P(scrapped|G2) = 0, P(G1) = 0.24, P(G2) = (1 - 0.62 - 0.24 - 0.14) x P(G1) = 0.027, and P(scrapped) = 0.14.
Plugging in the values, we get:
P(G2|scrapped) = (0 x 0.027) / ((0.14 x 0.19) + (0.24 x 0.81)) = 0.029
Thus, the probability that a valve was ground twice given that it was scrapped is 2.9%.

In summary, we can use Bayes' theorem to calculate the probability of a valve being ground twice given that it was scrapped. We first identify the relevant probabilities, such as the probability of a valve being scrapped given that it was reground once or twice. We then apply Bayes' theorem to obtain the desired probability. In this case, the probability that a valve was ground twice given that it was scrapped is 2.9%.

To know more about baye's theorem visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29598596

#SPJ11

In summary, if the input graph G(V, E) has a negative weight cycle, there are no solutions to the single-source shortest path problem.

In the single-source shortest path problem, the goal is to find the shortest path from a given source vertex to all other vertices in a graph G(V, E), where V is the set of vertices and E is the set of edges.
If the input graph G(V, E) has a negative weight cycle, then there are no correct solutions to the single-source shortest path problem. This is because the presence of a negative weight cycle allows for a path with decreasing total weight, as you can continually traverse the cycle to reduce the path's weight. As a result, the shortest path is undefined in this case.

To know more about graph Visit:

https://brainly.com/question/10712002

#SPJ11

The answer is that regression analysis is the most appropriate method.

The most appropriate statistical method to justify building a new elementary school in the district would be regression analysis. This method can be used to examine the relationship between the expected number of students and the capacity of the schools in the district.



Regression analysis is a statistical method that helps to determine the relationship between two or more variables. In this case, the expected number of students would be the independent variable, while the capacity of the schools in the district would be the dependent variable. By analyzing the relationship between these variables, the school district can make predictions about how many students will need to be accommodated in the future and whether a new elementary school is necessary.

In contrast, binomial distribution is a statistical method that is used to calculate the probability of a specific number of successes in a set of trials, which would not be suitable for this situation. Confidence intervals and hypothesis tests are statistical methods used to draw conclusions about populations based on sample data, but may not be the most appropriate method for this situation.

To know more about Regression analysis visit:

brainly.com/question/28178214

#SPJ11

To find the expected number of each animal type treated by the veterinarian, we will multiply the percentage distribution by the total number of animals treated in a month.

Total animals = 230

Dogs: 61% * 230 = 0.61 * 230 = 140.3 (approximately 140)
Cats: 22% * 230 = 0.22 * 230 = 50.6 (approximately 51)
Livestock: 8% * 230 = 0.08 * 230 = 18.4 (approximately 18)
Birds: 6% * 230 = 0.06 * 230 = 13.8 (approximately 14)
Other: 3% * 230 = 0.03 * 230 = 6.9 (approximately 7)

So, the expected number of each animal type treated is:
Dogs: 140
Cats: 51
Livestock: 18
Birds: 14
Other: 7

The correct answer is C) Animal type Dogs Cats Livestock Birds Other Expected 140 51 18 14 7

Learn more about expected number here: brainly.com/question/30887967

#SPJ11

The total number of dots in the first n rows of the triangular arrangement is equal to the sum of the first n positive integers. This can be represented by the formula: n(n+1)/2.

Based on the triangular arrangement mentioned in your question, the total number of dots in the first n rows can be described using the formula for the sum of the first n terms of an arithmetic series. This formula is:

Total number of dots = n(n + 1) / 2

Here, 'n' represents the number of rows. Using this formula, you can easily calculate the total number of dots for any given number of rows in the triangular arrangement.

Visit here to learn more about arithmetic series brainly.com/question/23874539

#SPJ11

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Area = W x L

Area = 42

all give 42 as a result

Based on the given data, the height of a plant from Variety A is likely to be closer to the mean. So, correct option is C.

Based on the given data, we can make the following observations:

The mean height of plants from Variety A is 19 inches, while the mean height of plants from Variety B is 13 inches.

The mean absolute deviation (MAD) for Variety A is 1.2 inches, while the MAD for Variety B is 2.4 inches. This means that the heights of plants from Variety A are less variable than the heights of plants from Variety B.

Option A cannot be concluded from the given data as we do not have information on the maximum height of plants from either variety.

Option B cannot be concluded from the given data as there is overlap in the height ranges of the two varieties.

Option C is likely to be true as the MAD for Variety A is smaller, indicating that the heights of plants from this variety are more tightly clustered around the mean of 19 inches.

Option D is unlikely to be true as the MAD for Variety B is larger, indicating that the heights of plants from this variety are more spread out and farther away from the mean of 13 inches.

In conclusion, based on the given data, we can say that the height of a plant from Variety A is likely to be closer to the mean, and the height of a plant from Variety B is likely to be farther away from the mean.

So, correct option is C.

To learn more about height click on,

https://brainly.com/question/29132018

#SPJ1

The approximation of [tex]e^3[/tex] obtained by using the fourth-degree Taylor Polynomial about x=0 is 16.375.

The fourth-degree Taylor polynomial for [tex]e^x[/tex] about x=0 is:

[tex]e^x[/tex]≈[tex]1 + x + x^2/2! + x^3/3! + x^4/4![/tex]

To find an approximation for e^3, we can substitute x=3 into the polynomial:

[tex]e^3[/tex] ≈[tex]1 + 3 + 3^2/2! + 3^3/3! + 3^4/4![/tex]

Simplifying the expression, we get:

[tex]e^3[/tex] ≈ 1 + 3 + 9/2 + 27/6 + 81/24

[tex]e^3[/tex]≈ 1 + 3 + 4.5 + 4.5 + 3.375

[tex]e^3[/tex]≈ 16.375

Therefore, the approximation of [tex]e^3[/tex] obtained by using the fourth-degree Taylor Polynomial about x=0 is 16.375.

Learn more about polynomial

https://brainly.com/question/11536910

#SPJ4

Answer:

(D) a two sample t -test for means

To determine if there is a significant difference in the average test score of talkative and quiet children at the age of 24 months, a two-sample t-test should be used.

To determine if there is a significant difference in the average test score of talkative and quiet children at the age of 24 months, you should use an Independent Two-Sample T-test. This test is appropriate because it compares the means of two independent groups (talkative and quiet) and the samples are simple random samples with the other conditions for inference being met. Here's a step-by-step explanation:

1. State the null and alternative hypotheses:
  H0 (null hypothesis): There is no significant difference in the average test score of talkative and quiet children (µ1 - µ2 = 0)
  Ha (alternative hypothesis): There is a significant difference in the average test score of talkative and quiet children (µ1 - µ2 ≠ 0)

2. Calculate the sample means, sample standard deviations, and sample sizes for each group.

3. Calculate the test statistic (T-value) using the formula:
  T = (M1 - M2) / sqrt((SD1² / n1) + (SD2² / n2))

4. Determine the degrees of freedom (df) using the formula:
  df = min(n1 - 1, n2 - 1)

5. Find the critical T-value from the T-distribution table for the given level of significance (e.g., α = 0.05) and the calculated degrees of freedom.

6. Compare the calculated T-value to the critical T-value:
  - If the calculated T-value is greater than or equal to the critical T-value, reject the null hypothesis.
  - If the calculated T-value is less than the critical T-value, fail to reject the null hypothesis.

7. Interpret the results in the context of the study, which is the relationship between language skills, mental development, and talkative/quiet children at the age of 24 months.

to learn more about  two-sample t-test click here:

brainly.com/question/13201390

#SPJ11

This means that Parker performed very well on the history exam, since his score is much higher than the average score in the class.

Step 1: Understand the concept of a z-score.

A positive z-score means that the data point is above the mean, while a negative z-score means that the data point is below the mean.

Step 2: Determine the mean and standard deviation of the normal distribution.

Since we are told that a normal model describes student scores in a history class, we can assume that the distribution of scores is normal. We need to know the mean and standard deviation of the distribution to calculate Parker's z-score.

Let's assume that the mean score in the class is 80 and the standard deviation is 10.

μ = 80

σ = 10

Step 3: Calculate Parker's raw score.

To calculate Parker's raw score, we need to use the formula for z-scores and solve for x:

z = (x - μ) / σ

We know that Parker's z-score is 2.5, and we know the values of μ and σ. Solving for x, we get:

2.5 = (x - 80) / 10

25 = x - 80

x = 105

So, Parker's raw score is 105.

Step 4: Interpret the result.

Since Parker's z-score is 2.5, we know that his score of 105 is 2.5 standard deviations above the mean of 80.

This means that Parker performed very well on the history exam, since his score is much higher than the average score in the class.

To know more about z-score visit:

brainly.com/question/30792829

#SPJ4

The probability of a grand piano selling for more than $67,400 is approximately 0.3819

To solve this problem, we need to standardize the given value using the mean and standard deviation and then find the area under the standard normal distribution curve corresponding to the standardized value.

We can use the Z-score formula to standardize the value:

Z = (X - μ) / σ

where X is the sale price, μ is the mean, and σ is the standard deviation.

Substituting the given values, we get:

Z = (67,400 - 66,000) / 4,600

Z = 0.3043

Using a standard normal distribution table or calculator, we can find the area under the curve to the right of Z = 0.3043. The probability of a grand piano selling for more than $67,400 is the same as the probability of a standard normal variable being greater than 0.3043.

From the standard normal distribution table, we find that the area to the right of Z = 0.3043 is approximately 0.3819.

Therefore, the probability of a grand piano selling for more than $67,400 is approximately 0.3819 or 38.19%.

To know more about normal distribution visit:

brainly.com/question/17199694

#SPJ4

It is proved by both combinatorial argument and algebraic argument that C(2n, 2) = 2 C(n, 2) + n².

The given statement is: C(2n, 2) = 2C(n, 2) + n²

Combinatorial argument:

Suppose we have to choose 2 balls from a bag consists of 2n balls.

So the number of ways to choose that 2 balls = C(2n, 2)

Now in order to do the same thing we take another process. We divide 2n balls in to equal n balls bags. Now we can choose 2 balls in following ways.

(i) 2 balls from first n ball bag and number of ways to do that = C(n, 2).

(ii) 2 balls from second n ball bag and number of ways to do that = C(n, 2) too.

(iii) 1 ball from first n ball bag and another ball from second n balls bag. The number of ways to do this = n*n = n²

So the number of ways to choose 2 balls from 2n balls by dividing the balls in equal two n balls bag is = C(n, 2) + C(n, 2) + n² = 2C(n, 2) + n².

But the event is same just the process to do the work is different so the number of ways to do the work will be equal.

Hence, C(2n, 2) = 2C(n, 2) + n².

Algebraic argument,

We know that C(n, k) = n!/(k!(n - k)!)

So, left hand side is,

C(2n, 2) = 2n!/(2!(2n - 2)!) = 2n(2n - 1)/2 = 2n² - n.

The right hand side is,

2C(n, 2) + n² = 2n!/(2!(n - 2)!) + n² = n(n - 1) + n² = 2n² - n.

Since Left Hand Side = Right Hand Side. So the statement is true by algebraic way too.

To know more about Combinatorial argument here

https://brainly.com/question/31501006

#SPJ4

To determine the number of ways you can achieve a 5-card hand without repeats from a deck of 52 cards, we can use the formula for combinations:

C(52, 5) = 52! / (5! * (52-5)!) = 2,598,960

This means that there are 2,598,960 ways to draw a 5-card hand without repeats from a standard deck of 52 cards.

In order to find the number of ways you can achieve a specific 5-card hand from a standard deck of 52 cards, you'll need to use combinations in discrete math. Combinations are used to calculate the number of ways to choose a certain number of items from a larger set, without considering the order of the items.

In this case, you want to choose 5 cards from a deck of 52 cards. Using the combination formula, you can determine the number of ways to do this:

C(n, k) = n! / (k!(n-k)!)

Where n is the total number of items (52 cards), k is the number of items you want to choose (5 cards), and ! represents the factorial function (e.g., 5! = 5 x 4 x 3 x 2 x 1).

Using the formula for your situation:

C(52, 5) = 52! / (5!(52-5)!)
C(52, 5) = 52! / (5!47!)

Calculating the factorials and dividing, you get:

C(52, 5) = 2,598,960

So, there are 2,598,960 ways to draw a 5-card hand from a standard deck of 52 cards without repeats.

Visit here to learn more about factorial function brainly.com/question/14938824

#SPJ11

To investigate whether there is convincing evidence, at a 5 percent level of significance, that a longer hand length is associated with a decrease in the time to complete the 100-meter freestyle, the researcher should use a linear regression t-test.

1. The researcher collects data on hand length and 100-meter freestyle completion time for twenty randomly selected swimmers.
2. Calculate the correlation coefficient (r) to measure the strength and direction of the relationship between hand length and freestyle completion time.
3. Perform a linear regression analysis to obtain the slope (b) and the y-intercept (a) of the best-fit line.
4. Conduct a linear regression t-test to determine if the slope (b) is significantly different from zero at a 5 percent level of significance.
5. If the t-test results in a p-value less than 0.05 (5 percent level of significance), there is convincing evidence that a longer hand length is associated with a decrease in the time to complete the 100-meter freestyle.

to learn more about linear regression t-test click here:

brainly.com/question/29993626

#SPJ11

The bicycle manufacturer is studying the reliability of its models and analyzing the probability of defects. They found the probability of a brake defect is 4 percent and the probability of both brake and chain defects is 1 percent.

Given that the probability of a defect with brakes or chain is 6 percent, we can find the probability of a chain defect using the formula: P(A and B) = P(A|B) * P(B), where P(A and B) is the probability of both events A and B occurring, P(A|B) is the probability of event A occurring given that event B has occurred, and P(B) is the probability of event B occurring.

In this case, we want to find the probability of a chain defect given that there is a defect with either the brakes or the chain. Let's use the events: A = brake defect, B = chain defect, From the problem statement, we know that: P(A) = 0.04 (probability of a brake defect), P(A and B) = 0.01 (probability of both a brake defect and a chain defect)
P(A or B) = 0.06 (probability of a defect with the brakes or the chain).

To find P(B|A or B), we can use the formula: P(B|A or B) = P(A and B) / P(A or B) = 0.01 / 0.06, = 1/6, = 0.1667, So the probability of a chain defect given that there is a defect with either the brakes or the chain is 16.67%, or approximately 2/12 or 1/6.

Therefore, the correct answer is option 2: 2%, Solving for the probability of a chain defect, we get: P(chain defect) = 0.06 - 0.04 + 0.01 = 0.03, So, the probability of a chain defect is 3 percent.

To know more about probability click here

brainly.com/question/15124899

#SPJ11

Anthony's family received $422,848 from the insurance company.

The policy was bought on June 5, 2010 and Anthony passed away on March 22, 2015.

The policy was active for:

= (5 years + 9.5 months)

= 58 months.

The total amount of premiums paid during this time was:

= $1,256/month x 58 months

= $72,848

The face value of the policy was $350,000. The total amount paid out to Anthony's family was:

= $350,000 + $72,848

= $422,848.

Read more about insurance

brainly.com/question/25855858

#SPJ4

Angle ABC is greater than angle C, as required. Given triangle ABC with AC greater than AB, and BD drawn such that AD is congruent to AB, we need to prove that angle ABC is greater than angle C.

To begin with, we can draw a diagram to visualize the situation. In the diagram, we see that BD is an altitude of triangle ABC, as well as a median since it divides the base AC into two equal parts. We also see that triangles ABD and ABC are congruent by the side-side-side (SSS) criterion, which means that angle ABD is equal to angle ABC.

Now, we can use this information to prove our statement. Since triangle ABD and triangle ABC are congruent, their corresponding angles are also equal. Therefore, we know that angle ABD is equal to angle ABC.

Next, we observe that angle ABD is a right angle, since BD is an altitude of triangle ABC. This means that angle ABC is the sum of angles ABD and CBD.

Since AD is congruent to AB, we also know that angles ABD and ADB are congruent. Therefore, angle CBD is greater than angle ADB.

Putting all of this together, we can conclude that angle ABC is greater than angle C, as required.

In summary, we have shown that given triangle ABC with AC greater than AB and BD drawn such that AD is congruent to AB, angle ABC is greater than angle C. This is because angles ABD and CBD add up to angle ABC, and angle CBD is greater than angle ADB.

learn more about congruence here: brainly.com/question/27922830

#SPJ11