Solve for the surface area for the following figure

Kyle may make ten unique solids by utilizing four identical unit cubes.

To create a solid, Kyle can glue the cubes together in different configurations.

Let's break down the possibilities based on the number of cubes that are glued together.

⇒ If all four cubes are glued together, there is only one possible solid.

⇒ If three cubes are glued together, there are four possible configurations: a straight line, an L-shape, a T-shape, and a corner shape.

⇒ If two cubes are glued together, there are three possible configurations: side by side, stacked, or at a right angle.

⇒ If only one cube is glued to another, there are two possible configurations: attached side to side or attached face to face.

To find the total number of distinct solids, we need to add up all the possible configurations.

⇒  1 (all four cubes glued together) + 4 (three cubes glued together) + 3 (two cubes glued together) + 2 (one cube glued to another)

So the answer is 10 distinct solids that Kyle can create using four identical unit cubes.

Learn more about the line visit:

https://brainly.com/question/18831322

#SPJ12

As per the question, the complexity that ranks between the other two is O(n^2) - Quadratic (or Polynomial).

As we compare the run-time complexities, it's crucial to examine the function’s growth with an increase in input size (n).

Let us analyze the growth rates:

Exponential (O(2^n)): The function doubles for each increment in n. This is very fast growth.

Quadratic (O(n^2)): The function grows proportional to the square of n. This is slower growth compared to exponential but faster than logarithmic.

Logarithmic (O(log n)): The function grows very slowly as n increases. The growth rate is less than linear (O(n)).

So the ranking, from slowest to fastest growth, is:

O(log n) - Logarithmic

O(n^2) - Quadratic (or Polynomial)

O(2^n) - Exponential

As per the question, the complexity that ranks between the other two is O(n^2) - Quadratic (or Polynomial).

Read more about quadratic run-time complexity here:

https://brainly.com/question/24488401
#SPJ1

Let (xn) be a sequence of positive real numbers that converges to a positive number. We aim to show that the set {x_n : n ∈ N} is bounded below by a positive number. Since the sequence converges to a positive number, we can choose an ε > 0 such that for all sufficiently large n, |x_n - L| < ε, where L is the limit of the sequence. By considering the inequality x_n > L - ε, we can see that all terms of the sequence are greater than or equal to a positive number, thereby establishing the boundedness from below.

Since the sequence (xn) converges to L, for any ε > 0, there exists a positive integer N such that for all n ≥ N, |x_n - L| < ε. This means that eventually, all terms of the sequence will be arbitrarily close to L.

Now, consider the inequality x_n > L - ε. For all n ≥ N, we have |x_n - L| < ε, which implies L - ε < x_n. Since L and ε are positive, we can rearrange the inequality to get x_n > L - ε.

Therefore, for all n ≥ N, we have x_n > L - ε, and since ε can be chosen to be any positive number, we can conclude that all terms of the sequence (xn) are greater than or equal to L - ε, which is a positive number.

Hence, the set {x_n : n ∈ N} is bounded below by a positive number, as desired.

Learn more about Sequence:

brainly.com/question/30262438

#SPJ11

The new coordinates of the image include the following:

W' (-1, 1)

X' (4, -1)

Y' (4, -5)

Z' (1, -7)

In Mathematics and Geometry, a reflection over or across the x-axis is represented by this transformation rule (x, y) → (x, -y). This ultimately implies that, a reflection over or across the x-axis would maintain the same x-coordinate while the sign of the y-coordinate changes from positive to negative or negative to positive.

Next, we would apply a reflection over or across the x-axis to quadrilateral WXYZ;

(x, y)                →      (x, -y)

W (-1, -1)         →      (-1, -(-1)) = W' (-1, 1)

X (4, 1)           →      (4, -(1)) = X' (4, -1)

Y (4, 5)         →      (4, -(5)) = Y' (4, -5)

Z (1, 7)         →      (1, -(7)) = Z' (1, -7)

Read more on reflection here: brainly.com/question/27912791

#SPJ1

Complete Question:

Quadrilateral WXYZ with vertices W (-1,-1), X (4,1), Y (4,5) and Z (1,7) reflected over the x-axis. What are the new coordinates of the image?

The Moon orbits Earth its position relative to the Sun changes causing different portions of the Moon's surface to be illuminated.

This creates predictable cyclic patterns, such as the phases of the Moon.

The Moon reflects sunlight as it orbits Earth due to its surface features, which include mountains, valleys, and craters.

These features scatter and reflect sunlight in different directions.

And causing the Moon to appear differently lit depending on its position relative to the Sun and Earth.

The phases of the Moon are determined by the amount of sunlight that is reflected from its surface as it orbits Earth.

When the Moon is between the Sun and Earth, its illuminated side faces away from Earth.

And causing the Moon to appear dark, known as a new moon.

As the Moon moves in its orbit, more and more of its illuminated side becomes visible from Earth.

And causing the Moon to appear to grow in size and brightness.

Until it reaches a full moon when the entire illuminated side is visible.

The cycle then repeats as the Moon moves in its orbit.

And causing the amount of illuminated surface visible from Earth to decrease until it reaches another new moon.

This cyclic pattern of changing illumination creates the predictable phases of the Moon that can be observed from Earth.

learn more about orbit here

brainly.com/question/19954117

#SPJ4

To determine how many different values appear in both lists, you can use a set intersection.

Here's how you can do it in Python:

list1 = [10, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60]

list2 = [20, 20, 40, 60, 80]

set1 = set(list1)

set2 = set(list2)

common_values = set1.intersection(set2)

print(len(common_values))  # Output: 3

In this code, we first convert each list to a set using the set() function. This eliminates any duplicate values in the list, leaving us with only the distinct values. We then use the intersection() method of set to get the common values between the two sets.

Finally, we use the len() function to determine the number of common values and print it out.

To learn more about intersection here:

https://brainly.com/question/29055360

#SPJ1

ans. option (a) 4

we take components of 4[tex]\sqrt{2}[/tex]

so 4[tex]\sqrt{2}[/tex] sin 45

putting values we get 4[tex]\sqrt{2}[/tex] /[tex]\sqrt{2}[/tex]

thus the answer is 4

The total length of craft wire used by Samantha is 10x + 9

What is the scale factor?

A scale factor is defined as the ratio between the scale of a given original object and a new object, which is its representation but of a different size (bigger or smaller).

Let's call the length of the smaller quadrilateral's 6-centimeter side "x".

Then the length of the corresponding side in the larger quadrilateral would be 6+3=9 centimeters, since the scale factor is 3.

To find the total length of craft wire used, we need to add up the lengths of all the sides in both quadrilaterals.

The smaller quadrilateral has four sides, each with a length of x.

The larger quadrilateral also has four sides, but only one of them has a different length (9 cm), while the other three sides are simply 3 times longer than the corresponding sides in the smaller quadrilateral.

So the total length of craft wire used by Samantha is:

4x + 9 + 3x + 3x + 3x

Simplifying this expression, we get:

10x + 9

Hence,  the total length of craft wire used by Samantha is:

10x + 9

To learn more about scale factor visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29967135

#SPJ4

If distance between the "two-cities" with a scale of 1/4 inch is 15 miles, then "actual-distance" between two cities is 300 miles.

If the distance between City X and City Y is represented by 5 inches on the map, and the scale is 1/4 inch = 15 miles, then we can use "scale-factor" to find the "actual-distance" between the two cities,

On map "1/4" inches represents 15 miles in real-life,

So, 1 inch on map will represent = 15 × 4 = 60 miles in "real-life",

So, the scale-factor is 1 inch = 60 miles,

The distance on map between city"X" and city"Y" is 5 inches;

So, the actual distance between the two cities is = 5 × 60 = 300 miles.

Therefore, the actual-distance between the "two-cities" is 300 miles.

Learn more about Scale Factor here

https://brainly.com/question/15465658

#SPJ1

The given question is incomplete, the complete question is

Jayden is planning to drive from City X to City Y. The scale shows that the distance between city"X" and city"Y" is 5 inches. The distance between the two cities with a scale of ¼ inch = 15 miles.

What is the actual distance between the two cities?

The height of the triangular pyramid, given that the volume is 318 square centimeters 7.31 cm (option B)

First, we shall obtain the base area of the triangular pyramid. Details below:

A = ½bh

A = ½ × 29 × 9

A = 130.5 cm²

Finally, we shall determine the height of the triangular pyramid. Details below:

V = ⅓Ah

318 = ⅓ × 130.5 × h

318 = 43.5 × h

Divide both sides by 43.5

h = 318 / 43.5

h = 7.31 cm

Thus, the height of the triangular pyramid is 7.31 cm (option B)

Learn more about height of triangular pyramid:

https://brainly.com/question/24086401

#SPJ4

Complete question:

See attached photo

The depth of the scientist below sea level after traveling downward for 102 seconds can be found by multiplying her speed by the time she traveled:

Distance = Speed x Time

Distance = 4.2 feet/second x 102 seconds

Distance = 428.4 feet

Since she traveled straight down, this distance is also her depth below sea level.

Next, we need to find how far she ascended. The distance she traveled upward can be found in the same way:

Distance = Speed x Time

Distance = 1.9 feet/second x 112 seconds

Distance = 212.8 feet

However, since she traveled upward, this distance is subtracted from her previous depth:

Final depth below sea level = Initial depth below sea level - Distance traveled upward

Final depth below sea level = 428.4 feet - 212.8 feet

Final depth below sea level = 215.6 feet

Therefore, the scientist is 215.6 feet below sea level at this point.

Learn more about Depth here:- brainly.com/question/28516504

#SPJ11

Jada's initial deposit was approximately $14,000.21.

To solve this problem, we can use the formula for compound interest:

A = P(1 + r/n)^(nt)

where A is the final amount, P is the principal (initial deposit), r is the annual interest rate, n is the number of times the interest is compounded per year, and t is the time in years.

In this case, we know that Jada deposited some amount of money (P) 5 years ago and that the bank has been paying interest at a rate of 6% per year compounded daily (365 times per year). We also know that she now has $21,000 on deposit.

Using the formula above, we can solve for P:

21,000 = P(1 + 0.06/365)^(365*5)

21,000 = P(1.0618)^1825

P = 21,000 / (1.0618)^1825

P ≈ $14,000.21

Find out more about Deposit

brainly.com/question/30557463

#SPJ11

Answer:

The answer would be 64%

Step-by-step explanation:

The concept used here is the fundamental concept is that someone will nearly surely occur. Meaning (favorable event/ total event)

Step 1: There are 25 total marbles because.

2+4+10+9=25

Step 2: Subtract the favorable event from the whole.

25/25-9/25= 16/25

Step 3: Rewrite as a percentage

1.00-0.36=

0.64

Step 4: Answer

64%

The 95% confidence interval for 2007 returns is -29.2% to 49.2%. We can calculate it in the following manner.

To calculate the 95% confidence interval for 2007 returns of stocks in the S&P 500, we first need to determine the margin of error. We can use the formula:

Margin of Error = z* (standard deviation / sqrt(n))

Where z* is the z-score for the desired level of confidence, which is 1.96 for a 95% confidence interval, standard deviation is 20%, and n is the sample size (which we assume to be 1).

So, Margin of Error = 1.96 * (0.20 / sqrt(1)) = 0.392

Next, we need to determine the range within which the true population mean is likely to lie. We can calculate this by adding and subtracting the margin of error from the sample mean. In this case, the sample mean is the average annual return over the period 1886-2006, which is 10%.

So, the 95% confidence interval for 2007 returns is:

10% +/- 0.392 or 9.608% to 10.392%

Therefore, we can be 95% confident that the true average annual return for stocks in the S&P 500 for the year 2007 falls between 9.608% and 10.392%.

Based on the provided information, the average annual return for stocks in the S&P 500 from 1886-2006 is 10%, and the standard deviation is 20%. To calculate a 95% confidence interval for 2007 returns, we can use the formula:

Confidence Interval = Mean ± (1.96 * Standard Deviation)

In this case, the mean is 10%, and the standard deviation is 20%. Plugging in these values, we get:

Confidence Interval = 10% ± (1.96 * 20%)

Confidence Interval = 10% ± 39.2%

Thus, the 95% confidence interval for 2007 returns is -29.2% to 49.2%.

Visit here to learn more about confidence interval brainly.com/question/24131141

#SPJ11

The probability of four successes in this binomial distribution is 0.2668, or approximately 26.68%. This means that if we conduct 9 trials with a 20% chance of success on each trial, we would expect to get exactly 4 successes with a probability of 0.2668.

To find the probability of four successes in a binomial random variable, we use the formula for the probability mass function (PMF) of a binomial distribution:

P(X=k) = (n choose k) * [tex]p^k[/tex] * (1-p)[tex]^(n-k)[/tex]

where n is the number of trials, p is the probability of success on each trial, k is the number of successes, and (n choose k) is the binomial coefficient, which represents the number of ways to choose k successes from n trials.

In this case, we have n = 9, p = 0.2, and k = 4. So, we can plug these values into the formula:

P(X=4) = (9 choose 4) * 0.[tex]2^4[/tex] * (1-0.2)[tex]^(9-4)[/tex]

= (126) * 0.[tex]2^4[/tex] * 0[tex].8^5[/tex]

= 0.2668

Therefore, the probability of four successes in this binomial distribution is 0.2668, or approximately 26.68%. This means that if we conduct 9 trials with a 20% chance of success on each trial, we would expect to get exactly 4 successes with a probability of 0.2668.

Learn more about binomial distribution i

https://brainly.com/question/31197941

#SPJ4

If the probability of rain is P, because there are only two outcomes, we know that the probability that will not rain is 1 - P

Let's say that the probability of rain tomorrow is P. There are two possible events here:

Then the second event is the negation of the first (Thus the probability is the composition), and notice that one of these events will happen, then the sum of the probabilities must be 1, then the probability that tomorrow will not rain is:

probability of not rain = 1 - P

Learn more about probability at:

https://brainly.com/question/25870256

#SPJ1

The domain of the function in this problem is given as follows:

(3, ∞).

The function in the context of this problem is given as follows:

f(x) = log7(x - 3) - 5.

The base of a logarithmic function must be positive, hence the domain of the function is obtained as follows:

x - 3 > 0

x > 3.

In interval notation, it is given as follows:

(3, ∞).

More can be learned about domain and range at https://brainly.com/question/26098895

#SPJ1

The catcher needs to throw the ball approximately 190.5 feet to reach second base from home plate.

Let's call the distance between the catcher and second plate "x" and the distance between the home plate and second plate "y". Using the Pythagorean theorem, we get:

distance² = x² + y²

We know that the distance between each base is 90 feet, so the distance between the home plate and second plate is

=> 90 + 90 = 180 feet.

Therefore, we can substitute "y" with 180 feet:

distance² = x² + 180²

We want to solve for "distance", so we need to isolate it on one side of the equation. We can do this by taking the square root of both sides:

distance = √(x² + 180²)

So, if the catcher is standing at home plate, the distance he needs to throw to reach second base is the square root of x² + 180², where "x" is the distance between the catcher and second plate.

The exact value of "x" would depend on where the catcher is standing on the field, but we can assume it's around 60 feet:

Which means that x = 60, then the distance is calculated as

distance = √(60² + 180²) = √(36000) = 190.5 feet

To know more about distance here

https://brainly.com/question/4199102

#SPJ4

The problem you're asking about is to create an algorithm that computes x^n, given a real number x and an integer n, in O(log n) time complexity. The solution to this problem is the "Exponentiation by Squaring" algorithm.

Here's a concise explanation of the algorithm in 150 words:

Exponentiation by Squaring is an efficient algorithm that calculates x^n using a divide and conquer approach, which takes advantage of the fact that x^n = (x^2)^(n/2) if n is even, and x^n = x * x^(n-1) if n is odd. The algorithm computes the result recursively or iteratively, and its time complexity is O(log n), making it efficient for large exponents.

To handle negative exponents, we can use the property x^(-n) = 1 / x^n. So, if the given exponent n is negative, we can calculate the reciprocal of x and use the positive value of n in the algorithm. For the base case, when n = 0, the result is always 1, since any non-zero number raised to the power of 0 equals 1.

By using Exponentiation by Squaring, we can quickly compute x^n for any real number x and any positive or negative integer n, in O(log n) time.

To know more about algorithm visit:

https://brainly.com/question/6718255

#SPJ11

The values of W and X that make NOPQ a parallelogram are:

W = -5w + 11

X = 3x

A quadrilateral with two sets of parallel sides is referred to as a parallelogram. In a parallelogram, the opposing sides are of equal length, and the opposing angles are of equal size.

To determine the values of W and X that make NOPQ a parallelogram, we need to find the conditions under which the opposite sides of the quadrilateral are parallel.

The coordinates of the points N, O, P, and Q are given as follows:

N: (w+7, 5w-5)

O: (3/2x, 3)

P: (?, ?)

Q: (?, ?)

For NOPQ to be a parallelogram, the vector from N to O should be equal to the vector from P to Q, and the vector from O to P should be equal to the vector from Q to N.

The vector from N to O is:

NO = (3/2x - (w+7), 3 - (5w-5))

   = (3/2x - w - 7, -5w + 8)

The vector from O to P should be equal to the vector from Q to N. Thus:

OP = (P_x - (3/2x), P_y - 3)

QN = ((w+7) - Q_x, (5w-5) - Q_y)

Equating the corresponding components, we get the following equations:

3/2x - w - 7 = P_x - (3/2x)

-5w + 8 = P_y - 3

w + 7 = (w+7) - Q_x

5w - 5 = (5w-5) - Q_y

Simplifying these equations, we find:

P_x = 3x

P_y = -5w + 11

Q_x = w + 7

Q_y = 5w

Therefore, the values of W and X that make NOPQ a parallelogram are:

W = -5w + 11

X = 3x

Learn more about parallelogram on:

https://brainly.com/question/27846700

#SPJ4

The mean of this distribution is 3 and the standard deviation is 1.45 .To find the mean and standard deviation of a distribution, we need to use some standard formulas. For a binomial distribution, the mean is given by:

mean = n * p

where n is the number of trials and p is the probability of success in each trial.

The standard deviation is given by:

standard deviation = sqrt(n * p * (1 - p))

where sqrt() means square root.

So, if we have a random variable with a binomial distribution, we can find its mean and standard deviation using these formulas. For example, if we have a binomial distribution with n = 10 trials and p = 0.3 probability of success, we have:

mean = 10 * 0.3 = 3

standard deviation = sqrt(10 * 0.3 * (1 - 0.3)) = 1.45

Therefore, the mean of this distribution is 3 and the standard deviation is 1.45. We can use the same formulas for any other binomial distribution to find its mean and standard deviation.

Learn more about deviation here:

https://brainly.com/question/23907081

#SPJ11

the probability of getting a sample mean of 96 or lower is essentially zero

We can use the central limit theorem to approximate the sampling distribution of the sample mean as normal with mean μ = 650 and standard deviation σ/√n = 120/√30 ≈ 21.87, where n = 30 is the sample size.

Then, we want to find the probability that the sample mean is less than a certain value. We can standardize this value using the z-score:

z = (x - μ) / (σ/√n) = (96 - 650) / (120/√30) ≈ -16.07

Using a standard normal distribution table or calculator, we can find that the probability of getting a z-score of -16.07 or lower is essentially zero (less than 0.0001).

To learn more about probability visit:

brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ11

The equation of the major axis of y = 1 / x would be y = x and y = -x.

The equation y = 1/x constitutes a rectangular hyperbola. Not like ellipses possessing broadly characterized principal axes, no finite line exists representing the major axis of the given hyperbola.

This is due to the symmetrical relationship around both x- and y-axes where its core remains positioned at (0, 0). In place of a definite line, the asymptotes operate in replaceable fashion, defined as the lines y = x and y = -x, which are values approached at near limit by this specific hyperbola yet never collided with.

Find out more on major axis at https://brainly.com/question/30950392

#SPJ1

Completing the squares for our quadratic equation we will get:

(3x - 2)^2 + 32 = 0

Here we have the quadratic equation:

3x^2-12x+36=0

We can rewrite our quadratic equation as follows:

3x^2 - 2*2*3x + 36= 0

Now, remember that the perfect square trinomial is:

(a + b)^2 = a^2 + 2ab + b^2

We can see that a = 3x and b = -2, then we need to add and subtract (-2)^2 = 4

We will get:

3x^2 - 2*2*3x + 4 - 4 + 36= 0

(3x - 2)^2 -4 + 36  =0

(3x - 2)^2 + 32 = 0

That is the equation with squares complete.

learn more about quadratic equations at:

https://brainly.com/question/1214333

#SPJ1

The statement provides constraints on the values of a negative number p and a positive number s, where 0 < s < |p|.

Inequality is a mathematical expression that describes a relationship between two values that are not equal. It is represented by symbols such as < (less than), > (greater than), ≤ (less than or equal to), ≥ (greater than or equal to), or ≠ (not equal to). Inequality can be used to compare numbers, variables, expressions, and equations, and it plays a fundamental role in algebra, calculus, and other branches of mathematics

The given statement can be written as:

p < 0 and 0 < s < |p|

Here, p is a negative number, which means it is less than zero. The second part of the statement shows that s is greater than zero (since it is given that 0 < s), and it is also less than the absolute value of p, denoted as |p|, which means that s is between 0 and |p|.

Overall, the statement is providing certain constraints on the values of p and s, which can be useful in solving a mathematical problem or proving a theorem.

To know more about Inequality visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30238989

#SPJ4

The solution of the system of equations is given by the ordered pair (2, 2).

In order to graph the solution to the given system of equations on a coordinate plane, we would use an online graphing calculator to plot the given system of equations and then take note of the point of intersection;

y = -x + 4    ......equation 1.

y = 1/2(x) + 1 ......equation 2.

Based on the graph shown in the image attached above, we can logically deduce that the solution to this system of equations is the point of intersection of the lines on the graph representing each of them, which lies in Quadrant I, and it is given by the ordered pairs (2, 2).

Read more on solution and equation here: brainly.com/question/25858757

#SPJ1

Answer:

a) 2.5 x 10^5

b) 8.1 x 10^4

c) 9.06 x 10^8

d) 1.034 x 10^10

The solution to the differential equation x″ - x = ( [tex]t^{2}[/tex] - 1)u(t-1) is (1/2) * ( [tex]t^{2}[/tex]  - 2t + 3) * u(t) + (1/2) * [tex](t-1)^{3}[/tex] * u(t-1) + u(t-1).

To solve the differential equation x″ - x = ( [tex]t^{2}[/tex]  - 1)u(t-1) using Laplace transforms, we first take the Laplace transform of both sides of the equation:

L{x″ - x} = L{( [tex]t^{2}[/tex]  - 1)u(t-1)}

Using the properties of Laplace transforms and the fact that L{u(t-a)} = e^(-as)/s, we get:

[tex]s^{2}[/tex] X(s) - s x(0) - x'(0) - X(s) = (1/[tex]s^{3}[/tex]) * ([tex]e^{-s}[/tex] / s) * ( [tex]t^{2}[/tex]  - 1)

Substituting x(0) = 1 and x'(0) = 2, and simplifying the right-hand side using partial fractions, we get:

([tex]s^{2}[/tex]  - 1) X(s) = (1/[tex]s^{3}[/tex]) * [tex]e^{-s}[/tex]  - (1/s) - (1/[tex]s^{2}[/tex]) + [tex](1/s-1)^{3}[/tex]

Multiplying both sides by the inverse Laplace transform of ([tex]s^{2}[/tex] - 1), which is [tex]d^{2}[/tex]/d[tex]t^{2}[/tex] - 1, we get:

x''(t) - x(t) = (1/2) *  [tex]t^{2}[/tex]  - (3/2) * u(t-1) + (1/2) * [tex](t-1)^{2}[/tex] * u(t-1) + u(t-1)

Taking the inverse Laplace transform of X(s) using partial fractions and the Laplace transform table, we get:

x(t) = (1/2) * ( [tex]t^{2}[/tex]  - 2t + 3) * u(t) + (1/2) * [tex](t-1)^{3}[/tex] * u(t-1) + u(t-1)

Therefore, the solution to the differential equation x″ - x = ( [tex]t^{2}[/tex]  - 1)u(t-1) with initial conditions x(0) = 1 and x′(0) = 2 is:

x(t) = (1/2) * ( [tex]t^{2}[/tex]  - 2t + 3) * u(t) + (1/2) * [tex](t-1)^{3}[/tex] * u(t-1) + u(t-1)

To learn more about differential equation here:

https://brainly.com/question/31583235

#SPJ4

We can see here that a proper use of unit multipliers to convert 24 square feet per minute to square inches per second is: B. 12 ft²/1 min × 1 ft/12 in. × 1 ft/12 in. × 1 min/60 sec.

A multiplier in mathematics is a factor that is multiplied by another quantity or number. It is employed to change the value of a number or quantity by a specific percentage.

We can see here that showing a proper use of unit multipliers to convert 24 square feet per minute to square inches per second, we will have:

Multiplying by a conversion factor to cancel out "feet" and convert to "inches". Since 1 foot = 12 inches, we can use the conversion factor: 1 ft/12 in.

Thus, we have that the multiplier will be: 12 ft²/1 min × 1 ft/12 in. × 1 ft/12 in. × 1 min/60 sec.

Learn more about multiplier on https://brainly.com/question/15883095

#SPJ1