Answer:
x = 8
Step-by-step explanation:
The angle with the expression in it is complementary to the 30° angle, so is 60°. Then we have ...
4 +7x = 60
7x = 56 . . . . . . subtact 4
x = 8 . . . . . . . . .divide by 7
Dan and Camille each have a gift card with a combined balance of $350.00. Dan spent 1/2 of his card balance while Camille spent 1/3 of her card balance. They are both left with an equal amount on their gift cards left. What are they left with.
A $210 suit is marked down by 10%. Find the sale price.
Answer:
sale prices = $252
Step-by-step explanation: 280 - (280 x 10%) = 280 - 28 = $252
Answer:
$189
Step-by-step explanation:
10% of 210 = 21
210 - 21 = 189
Suppose your total taxable income this year is $75,000 you are taxed a rate of 10 percent on the first 25,000 20 percent on the next 25,000 and 30 percent on the final 25,000 what is your total income tax
BP Under 30 30-49 Over 50 Total Low 27 38 31 96 Normal 48 90 92 230 High 23 59 72 154 Total 98 187 195 480 What is the percentage of employees who are 30 and over and have normal or low blood pressure? Group of answer choices 67.9% 52.3% 41.7% 75.4%
Answer:
The correct answer to the following question will be Option A (67.9%).
Step-by-step explanation:
As we know,
The number of total employees will be:
= 480
The number of employees having normal or low BP will be:
= 96 + 230
= 326
Hence, the percentage of low or normal BP workers will be:
= [tex](\frac{326}{480} )\times 100 \ percent[/tex]
= [tex]67.9 \ percent[/tex]
Note:- % (percent)
What is the main issue with plugging values into a function and then graphing it?
Too hard to calculate.
Takes too much time.
Never sure of exact data points.
Does not provide accurate results.
Answer:
B: It takes too much time
Step-by-step explanation:
Once the points have been calculated and then graphed, the solutions to y = 0 can be found. Look for y = 0 and the solutions are -5 and -1. But that takes a lot of time. There must be an easier way, and fortunately, there is.
A supermarket is redesigning it’s checkout lanes. Design A has a sample size of 50, sample mean of 4.1 minutes, and sample standard deviation of 2.2 minutes. Design B has a sample size of 50, sample mean of 3.5 minutes, and sample standard deviation of 1.5 minutes. At the 0.05 level of significance, determine if their is evidence that the checkout times of the two systems differ.
Answer:
The calculated value t = 1.57736 < 1.9845 at 5 % level of significance
Null hypothesis is accepted at 5 % level of significance
There is no significance difference between Design A and Design B
Step-by-step explanation:
Given sample size of design A
n₁ = 50
sample mean of design A x⁻₁ = 4.1 minutes
Sample standard deviation S₁ = 2.2 minutes
Given sample size of design B
n₂ = 50
sample mean of design A x⁻₂ = 3.5 minutes
Sample standard deviation S₂ = 1.5 minutes
Null Hypothesis : H₀ : There is no significance difference between Design A and Design B
Alternative Hypothesis : H₁:There is significance difference between Design A and Design B
Level of significance ∝ = 0.05
Test statistic
[tex]t = \frac{x^{-} _{1}- x^{-} _{2} }{\sqrt{S^{2} (\frac{1}{n_{1} }+\frac{1}{n_{2} }) } }[/tex]
where
[tex]S^{2} = \frac{n_{1} S_{1} ^{2} +n_{2} S^2_{2} }{n_{1} +n_{2} -2}[/tex]
[tex]S^{2} = \frac{50 (2.2)^{2} +50(1.5)^2}{50+50-2}[/tex]
On calculation , we get
S² = 3.6173
Test statistic
[tex]t = \frac{4.1-3.5}{\sqrt{3.617(\frac{1}{50} +\frac{1}{50} }) }[/tex]
On calculation , we get
t = 1.57736
Degrees of freedom
ν = n₁ + n₂ -2 = 50 +50 -2 =98
t₀.₀₂₅ ,₉₈ = 1.9845
The calculated value t = 1.57736 < 1.9845 at 5 % level of significance
null hypothesis is accepted
Really easy math question!
the answer is A: 146 ≤ 9c + 10
The relationship of variance and mean informs researchers about the spread of data. If a researcher calculates the mean abundance per unit area of a species, and then calculates the variance, the relationship between mean and variance will reflect the distribution pattern.
Which distribution pattern pictured below will have variance greater than the mean?
Answer:
The distribution pattern that will have variance greater than mean is one where the population of species is clustered and thus far from the mean abundance of species per unit area.
This distribution pattern can be found, using the POISSON distribution.
Step-by-step explanation:
Variance is a measure of dispersion while Mean is a measure of central tendency.
The mean is the average of all values (in this case, the abundance or concentration of species per unit area). It is the sum total of all values, divided by the number of values there are.
The variance of a given set of data, on the other hand, is a measure of the spread or distance or dispersal of the data from the mean. It measures the spread between each datum/value and the mean value.
The relationship between mean and variance surely reflects the pattern that the distribution will take. The kind of distribution pattern that will have a greater variance than mean is a Poisson distribution. Sample size is usually large here. Since the variance is greater than the mean, the population is a clustered or clumped distribution.
We know that if the probability of an event happening is 100%, then the event is a certainty. Can it be concluded that if there is a 50% chance of contracting a communicable disease through contact with an infected person, there would be a 100% chance of contracting the disease if 2 contacts were made with the infected person
Answer:
The correct answer to the following question will be "No". The further explanation is given below.
Step-by-step explanation:
Probability (Keeping the disease out of 1 contact)
= [tex]0.5[/tex]
Probability (not keeping the disease out of 1 contact)
= [tex]1-0.5[/tex]
= [tex]0.5[/tex]
Now,
Probability (not keeping the disease out of 2 contact)
= Keeping the disease out of 1 contact × not keeping the disease out of 1 contact
On putting the estimated values, we get
= [tex]0.5\times 0.5[/tex]
= [tex]0.25[/tex]
So that,
Probability (Keeping the disease out of 2 contact)
= [tex]1-0.25[/tex]
= [tex]0.75 \ i.e., 75 \ percent[/tex]
∴ Not 100%
A bag contains some number of marbles. It is known that 20 of them are red. When 15 marbles are drawn, without replacement, we get 6 red. Assuming E(X)=6 red, what is the total number of marbles in the bag?
Answer:
The total number of marbles in the bag is 50.
Step-by-step explanation:
Here, we have n trials, without replacement. So the hypergeometric distribution is used.
The mean of the hypergeometric distribution is:
[tex]E(X) = \frac{n*k}{N}[/tex]
In which n is the number of items in the sample, k is the number of items in the population that are classified a success and N is the size of the population.
15 marbles are drawn:
This means that [tex]n = 15[/tex]
A bag contains some number of marbles. It is known that 20 of them are red.
This means that [tex]k = 20[/tex], since a success is drawing a red marble.
Assuming E(X)=6 red, what is the total number of marbles in the bag?
We have to find N when [tex]E(X) = 6[/tex]
So
[tex]E(X) = \frac{n*k}{N}[/tex]
[tex]6 = \frac{15*20}{N}[/tex]
[tex]6N = 300[/tex]
[tex]N = \frac{300}{6}[/tex]
[tex]N = 50[/tex]
The total number of marbles in the bag is 50.
Help! Please do a,b,c and d with explanation
Answer:
a. 235°
b. 146.03 km
c. 105 km
d. 193 km
Step-by-step explanation:
a. The bearing of E from A is given as 55°. The bearing in the opposite direction, from E to A, is this angle with 180° added:
bearing of A from E = 55° +180° = 235°
__
b. The internal angle at E is the difference between the external angle at C and the internal angle at A:
∠E = 134° -55° = 79°
The law of sines tells you ...
CE/sin(∠A) = CA/sin(∠E)
CE = CA(sin(∠A)/sin(∠E)) = (175 km)·sin(55°)/sin(79°) ≈ 146.03 km
CE ≈ 146 km
__
c. The internal angle at C is the supplement of the external angle, so is ...
∠C = 180° -134° = 46°
The distance PE is opposite that angle, and CE is the hypotenuse of the right triangle CPE. The sine trig relation is helpful here:
Sin = Opposite/Hypotenuse
sin(46°) = PE/CE
PE = CE·sin(46°) = 146.03 km·sin(46°) ≈ 105.05 km
PE ≈ 105 km
__
d. DE can be found from the law of cosines:
DE² = DC² +CE² -2·DC·CE·cos(134°)
DE² = 60² +146.03² -2(60)(146.03)cos(134°) ≈ 37099.43
DE = √37099.43 ≈ 192.6 . . . km
DE is about 193 km
Calculate the length of the apothem of a regular polygon. A
regular hexagon is shown. What is the length of the apothem,
rounded to the nearest inch? Recall that in a regular hexagon,
the length of the radius is equal to the length of each side of the
hexagon
10 in.
a
5 in
9 in
11 in
4 in
Answer:
9 in
Step-by-step explanation:
For an n-sided polygon, the length of the apothem is ...
a = r·cos(180°/n)
We assume your problem statement is saying the radius is 10 inches. For a hexagon, n=6 and we have ...
a = (10 in)cos(30°) ≈ 8.66 in
Rounded to the nearest inch, the apothem is 9 in.
In ABC, mA = 46, mB = 105, and c = 19.8. Find a to the nearest tenth.
Answer:
a = 29.3785
Step-by-step explanation:
Given ∠A = 46° and ∠B = 105°
we know that ∠A +∠B+∠C = 180°
46° + 105° +∠C = 180°
∠C = 180 - 46 -105
∠ C = 29°
By using sine rule
[tex]\frac{a}{sin A} = \frac{b}{Sin B} = \frac{c}{Sin C} = 2 R[/tex]
[tex]\frac{a}{sin A} = \frac{c}{Sin C}[/tex]
Given ∠A = 46° and ∠ C = 29° and c = 19.8
[tex]\frac{a}{sin 46} = \frac{19.8}{Sin 29}[/tex]
on cross multiplication , we get
[tex]a = \frac{19.8 X sin 46}{Sin 29}[/tex]
a = 29.3785
. A certain coin is a circle with diameter 18 mm. What is the exact area of either face of the coin in terms of p?
Answer:
[tex] r =\frac{D}{2}=\frac{18mm}{2}= 9mm[/tex]
The area is given by:
[tex]A= \pi r^2[/tex]
And replacing we got:
[tex] A=\pi (9mm)^2 =81\pi mm^2[/tex]
So then we can conclude that the area of the coin is [tex] 81\pi[/tex] mm^2
Step-by-step explanation:
For this case we know that we have a coin with a diamter of [tex] D =18mm[/tex], and by definition the radius is given by:
[tex] r =\frac{D}{2}=\frac{18mm}{2}= 9mm[/tex]
The area is given by:
[tex]A= \pi r^2[/tex]
And replacing we got:
[tex] A=\pi (9mm)^2 =81\pi mm^2[/tex]
So then we can conclude that the area of the coin is [tex] 81\pi[/tex] mm^2
Adam earns $45,000 in his first year as an accountant and earns a 3% increase in each
successive year.
(a) Write a geometric series formula,
n S
, for Adam’s total earnings over
n
years.
(b) Use this formula to find Adam’s total earnings for her first 12 years of his job, to the nearest
cent.
Answer:
$638641.33
Step-by-step explanation:
Adam earns $45,000 in his first year.
His salary increases by 3% each successive year. Therefore, his salary the next year is 103% of his previous year.
This is a geometric sequence where the:
First Term, a= $45,000Common ratio, r =103%=1.03(a)
Sum of geometric series[tex]=\dfrac{a(r^n-1)}{r-1}[/tex]
Substituting the given values, Adam's total earnings over n years
[tex]=\dfrac{45000(1.03^n-1)}{1.03-1}\\\\$Adam's Total Earnings=\dfrac{45000(1.03^n-1)}{0,03}[/tex]
(b)When n=12 years
[tex]\text{Adam's Total Earnings for the first 12 years=}\dfrac{45000(1.03^{12}-1)}{0.03}\\=\$638641.33$ (correct to the nearest cent)[/tex]
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
There are 300 raffle tickets.
The prizes are as follows:
First prize - voucher for meal at local restaurant
Second prize - food hamper
Third prize - chocolate cake
4x homemade jams
3x homemade pickles
A prize is won after the first raffle ticket is drawn.
What is the probability of winning a prize when the next ticket is drawn?
Answer: 0.007
Step-by-step explanation:
Suppose that you have a ticket.
We have 3 prizes, and 300 tickets.
After the first tiket is drawn, someone win a prize, so now we have 299 tikets left and 2 prizes left.
Then, for the next draw, you have p = 1/299 of wining a prize.
If you did not win there, the probability for the third price is p = 1/298 (because there are 2 less tickets now)
Then the probability of winning at least one prize is:
P = 1/299 + 1/298 = 0.007
Jankord Jewelers permits the return of their diamond wedding rings, provided the return occurs within two weeks. Typically, 10 percent are returned. If eight rings are sold today, what is the probability that fewer than three will be returned
Answer:
[tex]P(X<3) =[/tex] [tex]0.9619[/tex]
Step-by-step explanation:
From the given information;
the probability of getting returned p = 0.1
If eight rings are sold today, what is the probability that fewer than three will be returned;
According to binomial distribution
Binomial distribution is the probability of success or failure of an outcome of an experiment under observation which is usually repeated several trials. Binomial experiments are random experiment with fixed number of repeated experiment. If we cannot predict before head, the outcome of an experiment , the experiment is called a random experiment.
So , using binomial distribution to determine the probability that fewer than three will be returned;
i.e
[tex]P(X<3) =[/tex] [tex]\sum_{x=0}^{2}\binom{8}{x}(0.1)^{x}(1-0.1)^{8-x}[/tex]
[tex]P(X<3) =[/tex] [tex]0.9619[/tex]
What is the range of g(x)=-1/2|x-6|+1
Answer:
The answer is A: ( - ∞, 1 )
Step-by-step explanation:
The following question involves a standard deck of 52 playing cards. In such a deck of cards there are four suits of 13 cards each. The four suits are: hearts, diamonds, clubs, and spades. The 26 cards included in hearts and diamonds are red. The 26 cards included in clubs and spades are black. The 13 cards in each suit are: 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, Jack, Queen, King, and Ace. This means there are four Aces, four Kings, four Queens, four 10s, etc., down to four 2s in each deck.
You draw two cards from a standard deck of 52 cards without replacing the first one before drawing the second. (a) Are the outcomes on the two cards independent? Why?
1. No. The events cannot occur together. 2. Yes. The events can occur together. 3. No. The probability of drawing a specific second card depends on the identity of the first card. 4. Yes. The probability of drawing a specific second card is the same regardless of the identity of the first drawn card.
(b) Find P(ace on 1st card and jack on 2nd). (Enter your answer as a fraction.)
(c) Find P(jack on 1st card and ace on 2nd). (Enter your answer as a fraction.)
(d) Find the probability of drawing an ace and a jack in either order. (Enter your answer as a fraction.)
Answer:
(a)No. The probability of drawing a specific second card depends on the identity of the first card.
(b)4/663
(c) 4/663
(d) 8/663
Step-by-step explanation:
(a)The events are not independent because we are drawing cards without replacement and the probability of drawing a specific second card depends on the identity of the first card.
(b) P(ace on 1st card and jack on 2nd).
[tex]P$(Ace on 1st card) =\dfrac{4}{52}\\ P$(Jack on 2nd card)=\dfrac{4}{51}\\\\$Therefore:\\P(ace on 1st card and jack on 2nd) =\dfrac{4}{52}\times \dfrac{4}{51}\\=\dfrac{4}{663}[/tex]
(c)P(jack on 1st card and ace on 2nd)
[tex]P$(Jack on 1st card) =\dfrac{4}{52}\\ P$(Ace on 2nd card)=\dfrac{4}{51}\\\\$Therefore:\\P(jack on 1st card and ace on 2nd) =\dfrac{4}{52}\times \dfrac{4}{51}\\=\dfrac{4}{663}[/tex]
(d)Probability of drawing an ace and a jack in either order.
We can either draw an ace first, jack second or jack first, ace second.
Therefore:
P(drawing an ace and a jack in either order) =P(AJ)+(JA)
From parts (b) and (c) above:
[tex]P$(jack on 1st card and ace on 2nd) =\dfrac{4}{663}\\P$(ace on 1st card and jack on 2nd) =\dfrac{4}{663}\\$Therefore:\\P(drawing an ace and a jack in either order)=\dfrac{4}{663}+\dfrac{4}{663}\\=\dfrac{8}{663}[/tex]
How far from zero would you move on the x-axis to reach the point (10, 8)?
Answer:
You would move 10 units to the right from zero on the x-axis.
The given point is 10 units from zero, when you move on the x-axis to reach the point (10, 8).
What is coordinate plane?A coordinate plane is a two-dimensional surface formed by two number lines. It is formed when a horizontal line (the X-axis) and a vertical line (the Y-axis) intersect at a point called the origin. The numbers on a coordinate grid are used to locate points.
The given coordinate point (10, 8).
The distance of any point from the x-axis is called the x-coordinate.
In the point (10, 8), 10 units from the x-axis
Therefore, the given point is 10 units from zero, when you move on the x-axis to reach the point (10, 8).
Learn more about the coordinate plane here:
https://brainly.com/question/24134413.
#SPJ6
please help, limited on time!!
Answer:
D. 5/13
Step-by-step explanation:
Cosin is adjacent/hypotenuse so, the adjacent would be 5 and the hypotenuse is 13 since it is the longest side. This is viewed from angle B.
Answer:
5/13 (answer D)
Step-by-step explanation:
cos beta = adjacent side / hypotenuse = 5 / 13 (answer D)
At the beginning of an experiment, a scientist has 300 grams of radioactive goo. After 150 minutes, her sample has decayed to 37.5 grams.
What is the half-life of the goo in minutes?
________
Find a formula for
G(t),
the amount of goo remaining at time T.
G= _________
How many grams of goo will remain after 32 minutes?
Answer:
Half-life of the goo is 49.5 minutes
[tex]G(t)= 300e^{-0.014t}[/tex]
191.7 grams of goo will remain after 32 minutes
Step-by-step explanation:
Let [tex]M_0\,,\,M_f[/tex] denotes initial and final mass.
[tex]M_0=300\,\,grams\,,\,M_f=37.5\,\,grams[/tex]
According to exponential decay,
[tex]\ln \left ( \frac{M_f}{M_0} \right )=-kt[/tex]
Here, t denotes time and k denotes decay constant.
[tex]\ln \left ( \frac{M_f}{M_0} \right )=-kt\\\ln \left ( \frac{37.5}{300} \right )=-k(150)\\-2.079=-k(150)\\k=\frac{2.079}{150}=0.014[/tex]
So, half-life of the goo in minutes is calculated as follows:
[tex]\ln \left ( \frac{50}{100} \right )=-kt\\\ln \left ( \frac{50}{100} \right )=-(0.014)t\\t=\frac{-0.693}{-0.014}=49.5\,\,minutes[/tex]
Half-life of the goo is 49.5 minutes
[tex]\ln \left ( \frac{M_f}{M_0} \right )=-kt\Rightarrow M_f=M_0e^{-kt}[/tex]
So,
[tex]G(t)= M_f=M_0e^{-kt}[/tex]
Put [tex]M_0=300\,\,grams\,,\,k=0.014[/tex]
[tex]G(t)= 300e^{-0.014t}[/tex]
Put t = 32 minutes
[tex]G(32)= 300e^{-0.014(32)}=300e^{-0.448}=191.7\,\,grams[/tex]
If P(-2, 1) is rotated 90°, its image is
The image of P(-2,1) after it is rotated 90° is (-1,-2).
The following data represent the number of flash drives sold per day at a localcomputer shop and their prices.Price Units Sold34 336 432 635 530 938 240 1a. Develop the estimated regression equation that could be used to predict thequantity sold given the price. Interpret the slope.b. Did the estimated regression equation provide a good fit? Explain.c. Compute the sample correlation coefficient between the price and the number offlash drives sold. Use a= 0.01 to test the relationship between price and units sold.d. How many units can be sold per day if the price of flash drive is set to $28.
Answer:
a)3145 x 0.01 = 31.45 3145- 31.45 = 3113.55
Compute the sample correlation 3113.55 -? we find the least square pressing at least 15x on the calculator then minus this from 3113.55 to find a better fit and minimum regression.
We add the differences of units then divide by distribution as seen below.
b) unsure.
c) = (see below) just test each number shown unit sold per day / price then x can show the differences in each number from day 1 to day 2.
d) = 16 sold.
Step-by-step explanation:
a) We count the units up and deduct from it from the equation p is recognized as units sold. R1 is cost R2 is total days.
b) The line of best fit is described by the equation ŷ = bX + a, where b is the slope of the line and a is the intercept (i.e., the value of Y when X = 0).
c) r 2= decimal ; the regression equation has accounted for percentage of the total sum of squares. You cna do this one.
d) = 16 sold at $28 each. - Why ? We using 7 day data and prove a how many units can be sold p/d if the price of flash drive is set to $28 each per unit.
Day 1 = 34 / 28 = 1 = 1.21428571429 = 1 no difference day prior.
Day 2 = 336 / 28 = 12 = 12 = difference day prior is 11
Day 3 = 432 / 28 = 15 = 15.4285714286 = 15 difference day prior is 3
Day 4 = 635 / 28 = 23 = 22.6785714286 = 23 difference day prior is 8
Day 5 = 530 / 28 = 19 = 18.9285714286 = 19 difference day prior is minus - 4
Day 6 = 938 / 28 = 34 = 33.5 = 34 difference day prior is 15
Day 7 = 240 / 28 = 9 = 8.57142857143 = 9 difference day prior is minus -25
Total days 7 = Total revenue / price = average units sold
Average units sold total = 1+ 12+15 +23 +19+34+9 = 113 rounded.
Average units sold total = 1.21428571429 + 12 + 15.4285714286
+ 22.6785714286
+18.9285714286
+ 33.5
+ 8.57142857143 = 112.321428572 units sold weekly when priced at $28
To answer D we divide this by 7 to show;
112.321428572/ 7 = 16.0459183674
Daily units sold = 16
3u - 3 = 15
give me a lecture so i can try to do it in the future please
Answer:
u=6
Step-by-step explanation:
One rule in algebra is what you do to one side, you do it to other side. So if you multiply a number in one side, multiply the same number in other side. Here in this question, you are trying to find the value of the variable u. Variable is called so because the value of it varies depending on different question. Here u is going to be a constant number which when multipled by 3 and then subtracted by 3 equals 15.
So first step is we try to get constants on one side. So we add 3 on both sides to get rid of 3 on left.
3u - 3 + 3= 15+3
3u= 18
Now we divide by 3 on both sides to get u by itself.
3u/3 = 18/3
u= 6
6th grade math :) ........
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
1) d
2) c
1) 3 hearts, 7 other shapes that isn't hearts
2) 2 triangs, 5 circles
Answer:
1) d
2) c
Step-by-step explanation:
looks like i was wrong last time lol, this is right for sure tho, i see what i did wrong, sorry
Real Estate One conducted a recent survey of house prices for properties located on the shores of Tawas Bay. Data on 26 recent sales, including the number of bathroom, square feet and bedrooms are below.
Selling Price Baths Sq Ft Beds
160000 1.5 1776 3
170000 2 1768 3
178000 1 1219 3
182500 1 1568 2
195100 1.5 1125 3
212500 2 1196 2
245900 2 2128 3
250000 3 1280 3
255000 2 1596 3
258000 3.5 2374 4
267000 2.5 2439 3
268000 2 1470 4
275000 2 1678 4
295000 2.5 1860 3
325000 3 2056 4
325000 3.5 2776 4
328400 2 1408 4
331000 1.5 1972 3
344500 2.5 1736 3
365000 2.5 1990 4
385000 2.5 3640 4
395000 2.5 1918 4
399000 2 2108 3
430000 2 2462 4
430000 2 2615 4
454000 3.5 3700 4
Action:
Use the data above and multiple regression to produce a model to predict the average sale price from other variables. Comment on the following:
a. Regression equation
b. R, R2 and 1-R2, adjusted R2
c. Standard error of estimate
d. Report the t's for each value and the corresponding p-values
e. Overall test of hypothesis and decision
f. Use a .05 level of significance. Cite which variables are significant and which are not significant, based on the t values and p values for each independent variable.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Hello!
Given the data for the variables:
Y: Selling price of a house on the shore of Tawas Bay
X₁: Number of bathrooms of a house on the shore of Tawas Bay.
X₂: Square feet of a house on the shore of Tawas Bay.
X₃: Number of bedrooms of a house on the shore of Tawas Bay.
The multiple regression model is Y= α + β₁X₁ + β₂X₂ + β₃X₃ + εi
a. Using software I've entered the raw data and estimated the regression coefficients:
^α= a= -5531.01
Represents the mean selling price of the houses when 0 bathrooms, 0 square feet and 0 bedrooms.
^β₁= b₁= -1386.21
Represents the modification of the mean selling price of the houses when the number of bathrooms increases in one unit and the square feet and number of bedrooms remain unchanged.
^β₂= b₂= 60.28
Represents the modification of the mean selling price of the houses when the square feet increase in one unit and the number of bathrooms and bedrooms remain unchanged.
^ β₃= b₃= 54797.08
Represents the modification of the mean selling price of the houses when the number of bedrooms increase in one unit and the number of bathrooms and square feet of the houses remain unchanged.
^Y= -5531.01 -1386.21X₁ + 60.28X₂ + 54797.08X₃
b)
R²= 0.55
R²Aj= 0.49
The coefficient of determination gives you an idea of how much of the variability of the dependent variable (Y) is due to the explanatory variables. Each time you add another explanatory variable to the regression the coefficient increases regarding of real contribution of the new variable. This could lead to thinking (wrongly) that the new variables are good to explain the dependent variable.
The adjusted coefficient of determination is a correction made to the raw coefficient of determination to have a more unbiased estimation of the effect the independent variables have over the dependent variable.
⇒ As you can see both coefficient are around 50%, which means that these explanatory variables
c)
The standard error estimate, this is the estimate of the population variance of the errors. In the ANOVA is represented by the Mean Square of the errors (MME)
Se²= MME= 3837640577.01
Se= 61948.6931
d) and f)
For the hypotheses tests for each slope the t- and p-values are:
α: 0.05
β₁: [tex]t_{H_0}= \frac{b_1-\beta_1 }{Sb_1}[/tex] t= -0.06; p-value: 0.9528 ⇒ Do not reject H₀, the test is not significant.
β₂: [tex]t_{H_0}= \frac{b_2-\beta_2 }{Sb_2}[/tex] t= 2.56; p-value: 0.0180 ⇒ Reject H₀, the test is significant.
β₃: [tex]t_{H_0}= \frac{b_3-\beta_3 }{Sb_3}[/tex] t= 2.28; p-value: 0.0326 ⇒ Reject H₀, the test is significant.
e)
H₀: β₁= β₂= β₃
H₁: At least one βi is different from the others ∀ i=1, 2, 3
α: 0.05
F= 9.03
p-value: 0.0004
⇒ Reject H₀, the test is significant.
I hope it helps!
7. Tyson obtained a loan from the bank at 7.5% simple interest for 2. 5 years. If the simple interest was
N$347.50, how much did he borrow?
8. Hilma invested N$20 000 on 01/01/2018 at 9.5 % interest p.a compounded semi-annually.
How much will she receive by 01/01/2022?
Answer:
7.He borrowed $1853.33
8.She received $28990.936
Step-by-step explanation:
7.Let x be the amount borrowed by Tyson
Rate of interest = 7.5%
Time = 2.5 years
Simple Interest = 347.50
Formula : [tex]Si = \frac{P \times T \times R}{100}[/tex]
Where SI = simple interest
P = Principal
T = Time
R = Rate of interest
Substitute the values in the formula :
[tex]347.50=\frac{x \times 2.5 \times 7.5}{100}\\\frac{347.50 \times 100}{2.5 \times 7.5}=x\\1853.33=x[/tex]
Hence he borrowed $1853.33
8) Principal = 20000
Rate of interest = 9.5%
No. of compounds per year = 2
Time = 4 years
Formula : [tex]A=P(1+\frac{r}{n})z^{nt}[/tex]
Where A= amount
r = Rate of interest
n = no. of compounds
t = time
Substitute the values in the formula :
So, [tex]A=20000(1+\frac{9.5}{200})^{2(4)}[/tex]
A=28990.936
Hence she received $28990.936
6th grade math help me. :D.....
Answer:
(1) 4x + 28 (2) 18x- 27
Step-by-step explanation:
the first question 4(x + 7) can be simplified by multiplying the number outside the parenthesis (4) by both of the values inside:
4x + 28 or the last answer choice
in the second question you can use the same method:
9 (2x) = 18x
9 ( -3) = -27
therefore the correct answer choice is 18x - 27
hope this helps :)
An urban economist is curious if the distribution in where Oregon residents live is different today than it was in 1990. She observes that today there are approximately 3,109 thousand residents in NW Oregon, 902 thousand residents in SW Oregon, 244 thousand in Central Oregon, and 102 thousand in Eastern Oregon. She knows that in 1990 the breakdown was as follows:
72.7% NW Oregon, 20.7% SW Oregon, 4.8% Central Oregon, and 2.8% Eastern Oregon.
Can she conclude that the distribution in residence is different today at a 0.05 level of significance?
a) Yes, because the p-value = .0009.
b) No, because the p-value = .0009.
c) Yes, because the p-value = .0172.
d) No, because the p-value = .0172.
Answer:
c) Yes, because the p-value = 0.0172
Step-by-step explanation:
The following table is obtained:
Categories Observed(fo) Expected (fe) (fo-fe)²/fe
NW Oregon 3109 4357*0.727=3167.539 1.082
SW Oregon 902 4357*0.207=901.899 0
Central Oregon 244 4357*0.048=209.136 5.812
Eastern Oregon 102 4357*0.028=121.996 3.277
Sum = 4357 4357 10.171
(1) Null and Alternative Hypotheses
The following null and alternative hypotheses need to be tested:
H0:p1=0.727,p2=0.207,p3=0.048,p4=0.028
Ha: Some of the population proportions differ from the values stated in the null hypothesis
This corresponds to a Chi-Square test for Goodness of Fit.
(2) Rejection Region
Based on the information provided, the significance level is α=0.05, the number of degrees of freedom is df=4−1=3, so then the rejection region for this test is R={χ2:χ2>7.815}.
(3) Test Statistics
The Chi-Squared statistic is computed as follows:
[tex]X^2=\sum^n_{i=1}\frac{(O_i-E_i)^2}{y} \\\\= 1.082+0+5.812 +3.277 = 10.171[/tex]
(4) Decision about the null hypothesis
Since it is observed that
[tex]X^2 = 10.171 > X_c^2 = 7.815[/tex]
it is then concluded that the null hypothesis is rejected.
(5) Conclusion
It is concluded that the null hypothesis H_o is rejected. Therefore, there is enough evidence to claim that some of the population proportions differ from those stated in the null hypothesis, at the α=0.05 significance level.