the following is information that should be taken into consideration when making suitable recommendations concerning the purchase of insurance, except:

True. Federal courts and state courts cannot share concurrent jurisdiction. Even when a federal court has jurisdiction, state law matters may not be decided by federal trial courts inside a particular state.

The most suitable court site for a case is determined by the venue. Federal courts and state courts cannot share concurrent jurisdiction. When two or more courts from various legal systems simultaneously hold jurisdiction over a certain case, this is known as concurrent jurisdiction.

The parties will attempt to have their civil or criminal action heard in the court they believe will be most favorable to them, which frequently results in forum shopping. The ability of two or more courts from various jurisdictions to hear the cases mentioned below is referred to.

Learn more about jurisdiction Visit: brainly.com/question/10377896

#SPJ4

Explanation:

The author should submit an evidence-based claim. Thus, the first step in the prewriting process for an argumentative essay is to develop an opinion.

The removal of an item's subsidies causes the supply curve for that item to move to the left.

A leftward shift of the supply curve represents a reduction in the amount of a good or service offered at a particular price. The non-price factors of demand cause changes in demand.

Tastes and preferences, population size or composition, costs of comparable commodities, and even expectations are other factors that might alter demand. A shift will result from a change in any one of the underlying variables that govern the volume of goods people are willing to purchase at a specific price.

The supply curve shifts to the right, creating an intersection where quantity and prices are lower, when demand is stable and supply is growing. A decrease in supply, on the other hand, leads the curve to shift to the left, increasing costs and decreasing quantity.

To learn more about leftward shift of the supply curve, please refer:

https://brainly.com/question/9046524

#SPJ4

Contract law is a substantive law because substantive law defines and determines rights and obligations of the citizens. In view of Order VIII Rule 1 of the CPC, the defendant's entitlement to file a written statement within of 30 days following the serving of summons is undeniable.

Substantive laws are the set of statutory rules legislated by the government for the citizens, these law set forth punishment and also defines the rights and responsibilities of the citizens.  

However, procedural law states how a mechanics of legal case flows at the different levels, it adheres the due process. some of the example of Substantive laws are Transfer of property act, contract act, tort etc. According to the rules of court of United States the defendant shall serve an answer within 30 days after being served with the summons and after service of initial complaint.

The Substantive Law would be a Statutory statute which outlines and regulates the citizen's legal rights and obligations. Procedural Law, sometimes known as Adjective Law, is concerned with the application of law that is governed and regulated by practice, procedure, and machinery.

To know more about "Contract law" visit-

brainly.com/question/14316157

#SPJ4

True. Personnel from supporting agencies may be included in the full activation of an eoc. To enhance event management, the EOC offers multiagency coordination of information and resources (on-scene operations).

In reaction to a significant catastrophe or disaster, the EOC is activated with all employees and may stay operational at this level for a number of weeks. Within NIMS Command and Coordination, EOCs perform the following primary duties: Information management is the process of gathering, evaluating, and communicating key information from multiple sources.

Resource management is the coordination of assistance for requests and needs for resources. When the EOC is activated, along with the supporting agencies, that is considered the full activation level. These organizations are in charge of assisting in the reaction to serious incidents or credible threats.

Learn more about Eoc agencies Visit: brainly.com/question/30415761

#SPJ4

The four elements of negligence in the individuals within an organization, include,

The negligence is an element that can be referred to or considered as the one wherein the utmost mistake and erroneous behavior of an individual is being defined and identified. Thus, more often than not, an individual must try not to commit to any of the four elements of negligence in an organizational environment that have been provided above to stay aware of the consequences.

Learn more about negligence here:

https://brainly.com/question/12177947

#SPJ4

All forms of notarial certificates require that the notary public lit the State and County in which the notarial action takes place. This statement is true.

The notarial certificate is a written declaration that certifies the details of a notarial act and is signed and sealed by a notary public. Giving oaths and accepting acknowledgments are the two most typical notarial actions that a notary will be required to complete. Oaths and acknowledgments are two distinct notarial acts, so each will call for a separate language in the certificate. Always ensure that you utilize proper notarial wording by consulting the commissioning authority in your state.

Notarization of legal documents helps to prevent fraud and ensure that transactions are carried out correctly. In order to weed out forgers and make sure that participants enter into an agreement voluntarily and knowingly, notaries are required to identify signatories to a document while confirming its authenticity.

Learn more about notarial certificates here:

https://brainly.com/question/28465172

#SPJ2

A) The nature of the family dispute is substantive.

B) The source of the disagreement is over the entitlement to the land based on biological or adopted relationship with the ancestor.

C) Approaches to bringing peace between the two groups could include mediating the dispute with a neutral third party, exploring options for a compromise or cooperative solution, or engaging in a collaborative dialogue to better understand each other's perspectives and needs.

Family B may have a valid claim to the land if they can provide evidence that they were adopted by the ancestor whose land is in dispute. Adoption is a legal process and would be documented. If they can prove that they were adopted by the ancestor, they would likely be entitled to a portion of the land.

Both families should consider consulting a lawyer to help them settle the dispute. Additionally, if the dispute involves legal matters, both families may benefit from seeking legal counsel.

To learn more about legal counsel link is here

brainly.com/question/30061988

#SPJ4

While a summary judgment motion is not a substitute for trial, it is a tool that allows courts to weed out cases that do not need a trial to be resolved.

If Taco bell won summary judgement in its favour what would happen to Wrench's case?

Taco Bell Corp. (Defendant) and Wrench, LLC (Plaintiff) discussed the potential use of Plaintiff's "Psycho Chihuahua" cartoon character. Plaintiff filed a lawsuit after Defendant started running commercials featuring a chihuahua, alleging Defendant had broken an implied-in-fact contract.

Pizza Hut was substituted for Taco Bell in several non-American releases because the former was at the time virtually unknown in many other nations. This includes dubbing and branding modifications made in post-production. In the end credits, Taco Bell is still mentioned.

Wrench filed a lawsuit in district court against Taco Bell, alleging, among other things, charges of unfair competition, conversion, misappropriation, and implied contract breach. The district court partially granted and partially rejected Taco Bell's move for dismissal.

To learn more on summary judgment from the link:

https://brainly.com/question/1396036

#SPJ1

According to the preponderance standard, the burden of proof is satisfied when the party presenting it persuades the fact-finder that the claim has a higher than 50% chance of being true. In a civil trial, the burden of proof is this.

To establish anything by a majority of the evidence is to merely demonstrate that it is more probable than not. Do you think that each part of his or her [claim/counterclaim] is more likely to be true than false in light of the evidence and the law, to put it another way?

When presented with contradictory probabilities regarding a circumstance, a cautious man will proceed under the assumption that the real fact exists unless, after assessing the various possibilities, he decides that the preponderance is in favour of another course of action.

Hence option B is correct .

Learn more  about preponderance here

https://brainly.com/question/30300287

#SPJ9

Answer:

You are expected to win. The majority of facts and evidence provide support for your claim.

Explanation: got it right on my law studies exam

The primary role or responsibilities of the US government include the development and enforcement of social norms, as well as the management of the military, foreign policy, economy, and public services.

Creates laws; legislative (Congress, comprised of the House of Representatives and Senate) Executes legislation as an executive (president, vice president, Cabinet, most federal agencies) Judiciary: Assesses laws (Supreme Court and other courts).

On July 4, 1776, the Second Continental Congress formally proclaimed its independence from the Kingdom of Great Britain, establishing the United States' first independent federal government. It was a temporary administration that oversaw the creation of the Articles of Confederation. The U.S. Federal Government is divided into three branches: the legislative, executive, and judicial. This arrangement promotes the separation of powers.

Learn more about government Visit: brainly.com/question/26119802

#SPJ4

Correct Question:

The basic role of the united states government is to _____.

It's false. A bill is suggested by a member of Congress. A bill is a piece of writing that would come law if passed. Visit Congress.gov to view the textbook of bills that Congress has or is presently considering.

When a bill is passed, the House of Representatives harmonises its language before publishing it in the United States Code(U.S.C.). The general and endless laws of the United States are codified by subject matter in theU.S.C. TheU.S.C. has been released every six times since 1926. The most recent material is presented between editions in the form of periodic accretive supplements. We always consider if a regulation is indeed necessary before creating one.

Learn more about Congress here:

https://brainly.com/question/4736734

#SPJ4

The given statement " When congress wants to regulate an issue, it most often passes very detailed regulations so that there are no questions about its intent." is false in light of the fact that When congress needs to direct an issue, it most frequently passes extremely nitty gritty guidelines so there are no inquiries regarding its aim.

An administrative agency depicted about that framed by empowering regulation likewise gives the power to lay out guidelines that will authorize and execute the law.

Rule is another word that is utilized conversely with regulation. Regulations are otherwise called Demonstrations of Congress. The capability of the bureaucratic organization is to plays out an essential tasks in government that is execution, organization and guideline.

Learn more about congress regulation:

https://brainly.com/question/12921514

#SPJ4

It is the right of the people to change or abolish any form of government if it becomes harmful to these purposes (life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness) and to enact new forms of governance.

This is a well-known quotation from Thomas Jefferson, and the phrase "whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends" means that:

According to the Declaration's fourth and last self-evident truth, citizens of a country have the right to organize a revolution if their government violates rather than protects their unalienable rights. The people have the right to overthrow such a government and install a new one that will behave in a way that would offer them safety and pleasure if the government is unable to achieve that.

To learn more about government becomes destructive visit;

https://brainly.com/question/28040371

#SPJ4

Salary and benefits, theft of company property, self-dealing, exploitation of corporate possibilities, insider trading, and neglect of board duties are only a few examples of major conflicts of interest.

Interlocking directorates are typically a problem that is harmful for both enterprises and the director. If a board member joins the board of a competing company, they will likely have access to proprietary information, which promotes unfair competition.

If a firm purchases another company and one of its executives or directors is a member of the boards of directors or a director of both companies, for example, there may be a conflict of interest with the interlocking directorates. The shareholders or other board members frequently elect or nominate the members of the board of directors.

Learn more about Interlocking directorates: https://brainly.com/question/8467990

#SPJ1

No, the court may not need to dismiss the younger passenger's claim for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction because the court can exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the claim.

In this case, the court can exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the younger passenger's claim because it shares a common nucleus of operative fact with the older passenger's claim, which falls within the court's original subject matter jurisdiction. However, supplemental jurisdiction is not allowed if a supplemental claim contaminates diversity or seeks less than $75,000 in damages. Since both passengers are from the same state, there is no contamination.

To know more about subject-matter jurisdiction, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30386872

#SPJ4

All of these are ways to express a legal description EXCEPT benchmarks. Option B

A benchmark is a point of reference for surveying or mapping, often a physical mark on a permanent object such as a building or monument.

The method of expressing a legal description that is NOT one of the ways is "benchmarks."

While benchmarks may be used in the process of creating a legal description, they are not typically considered a method of expressing the description itself.

The other three methods listed are ways to express a legal description:

a. Rectangular survey: A rectangular survey is a system of surveying land in a grid pattern, with each parcel of land described by its location in the grid.

b. Lot and block: A lot and block system is a method of describing a parcel of land by its location within a subdivision or plat, often using a map or plan of the subdivision.

c. Metes and bounds: The metes and bounds system is a method of describing a parcel of land by its boundaries and physical landmarks, often using measurements and angles to define the boundaries.

Hence, the correct answer is benchmarks.

Learn more about legal description at:https://brainly.com/question/24257457

#SPJ1

The statement "Treat alarm reports as potential crimes." is true

Generally, Yes, it is appropriate to investigate alarm reports as possible criminal acts. It is possible that police will be called to investigate the situation depending on the kind of alarm report that was received.

Because alarm reports could pertain to theft, vandalism, fire, or any number of other potential acts of criminality, it is imperative that they be taken seriously and that appropriate action be taken in response to them.

Read more about alarm

https://brainly.com/question/4181783

#SPJ1

The constitutional provision at issue in Schenck v. United States was the First Amendment, specifically the freedom of speech.

In Schenck v. United States case, the Supreme Court was tasked with determining whether Schenck's actions of distributing anti-war leaflets during World War I violated the Espionage Act of 1917 and, if so, whether that violated his First Amendment rights.

The Court ultimately ruled that Schenck's actions did violate the Espionage Act and that the First Amendment did not protect him in this instance. The Court held that the freedom of speech is not absolute and can be limited in times of war or when it presents a "clear and present danger" to the nation's security.

Hence, the constitutional provision at issue in Schenck v. United States was the First Amendment's freedom of speech, and the Court's ruling established the "clear and present danger" test for limiting that freedom in certain circumstances.

Learn more about Schenck v. United States:

https://brainly.com/question/24938794

#SPJ11

[tex]\huge\underline{\red{A}\green{n}\blue{s}\purple{w}\pink{e}\orange{r} →}[/tex]

Consequences of white-collar crime are given below↓

Explanation:

The president of United States nominates the justices to the Supreme Court.

The supreme court is the apex court of United States i.e. the highest court in the land and the only part of federal judiciary required by the constitution. The president nominates judges of the supreme court, which is later discussed with the senate, and the justice is confirmed by the U.S. senate and hold their office for life tenure. The constitution wanted judiciary to be free from any judicial pressure that is why the nominations are made and after a complete discussion by panel of senate members judges are appointed.

To know more about "Supreme Court" visit-

brainly.com/question/1755400

#SPJ4

Due to precedents established by other authorities, it is assumed that these will be granted. Any given governmental body can't function without these implied powers.

What are implied powers?

Implied powers are those that the federal government of the United States assumes but which are not specifically mentioned in the Constitution. Particularly, implicit powers are those that Congress may use but which are not expressly stated in the constitution of the country. Although not expressly stated in the Constitution, Congress may use whatever authorities deemed "necessary and proper" to carry out its specific duties. The United States Constitution's Article 1 is the source of the majority of these implied powers. In other words, this power gives Congress the ability to effectively lead the country as it develops. This clause was incorporated by the Constitution's initial drafters to let the government's authority evolve through time.

To learn more about  implied powers visit;

https://brainly.com/question/27728796

#SPJ4

A complainant, or a plaintiff, is the term that is being used in the essence of referring to the individual who tends to file a complaint against an individual or a group.

A plaintiff may be time and again taken into consideration as the person who has been given the responsibility of making a complaint against an individual for the inconvenience or harm caused to him or her by an individual. The person against whom the individual files a complaint is known as the defendant. Both the plaintiff and defendant defend their views in the court of law.

Learn more about a plaintiff here:

https://brainly.com/question/29213554

#SPJ4

In the United States, an accused person who cannot afford a private defense lawyer the government will provide an attorney to the accused free of charge. (Option A)

In the US, if an accused person cannot afford a private defense lawyer, a public defender will be appointed to them by the government for free.  This is outlined in the Sixth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which guarantees the right to counsel for criminal defendants.

It is important to note that the right to counsel does not mean that an accused person is entitled to the lawyer of their choice, but rather that they are entitled to effective assistance of counsel. If an accused person is deemed indigent, or unable to afford a private defense lawyer, the government will appoint a public defender to represent them. Public defenders are attorneys who are employed by the government specifically to provide legal representation to those who cannot afford it.

In summary, an accused person in the United States who cannot afford a private defense lawyer will be provided with a public defender by the government at no cost to them.

Learn more about Right to counsel:

https://brainly.com/question/17649565

#SPJ11

A broker-dealer assists a corporation going public by acting as an underwriter.

In this role, the broker-dealer helps the corporation to issue and sell its securities to the public. This involves determining the price of the securities, creating a prospectus for potential investors, and managing the sale of the securities to the public.

As an underwriter, the broker-dealer also assumes some of the risk associated with the offering by agreeing to buy any unsold securities. This helps to ensure that the corporation is able to raise the necessary capital through the offering. Overall, the broker-dealer plays a crucial role in helping the corporation to go public and raise capital from investors.

Learn more about broker-dealer brainly.com/question/14330803

#SPJ11

Tarek's tax due is given as $3200

To determine Tarek's tax due, we need to calculate his taxable income, then use the tax tables or a tax calculator to find the amount of tax owed.

First, let's calculate his taxable income:

Adjusted Gross Income (AGI) $37,059

Less: Personal exemption ($12,400)

Taxable Income $24,659

Next, we can use the tax tables for the 2021 tax year to find the amount of tax owed. Based on the taxable income of $24,659 and the tax tables for the 2021 tax year, Tarek's tax due would be approximately $3,206.

Read more on taxes here:https://brainly.com/question/25783927

#SPJ1

Answer:

B. Come to a complete stop.

Explanation:

Answer:

Explanation:

Come to a complete stop behind the stop line.

Explanation:

announcing the job, reviewing applications, screening candidates, interviewing, final selection, testing, and making an offer.