The judge's decision was grounded on the principle of regard decisis, which is Latin for" let the decision stand".
This means that the judge was obliged to follow the precedent set by the analogous case from three times agone.This means that the judge was obliged to reach the same conclusion as the court did in the former case, anyhow of the data presented in the current case. gawk decisis is a foundation of the US legal system and is grounded on the idea that all cases should be decided the same way, anyhow of who the parties involved are. This ensures that the law remains harmonious, and that people can calculate on it in making opinions. It also allows people to prognosticate the outgrowth of their cases, which helps to give a sense of fairness and justice.
To know more about prognosticate visit:
https://brainly.com/question/11554778?referrer=searchResults
#SPJ4
A landowner owned several dozen acres of mountain land near a national forest. A plaintiff who was injured by a condition on the owner's land brought an action for personal injury against the landowner.
In a jurisdiction that applies the traditional rules for landowners and possessors of land, which of the following plaintiffs is most likely to win?
(A) A 10-year-old trespasser who was swept onto some rocks while attempting to cross a swiftly flowing river.
(B) A five-year-old trespasser who fell into
a mineshaft from which the owner had removed all warning signs, but the plain- tiff was not attracted onto the owner's land because of the mineshaft.
(C) A five-year-old trespasser who inadver- tently stepped into a badger hole that was obscured in the undergrowth.
(D) A 10-year-old niece visiting the landowner who stepped into a badger hole that the landowner did not know was present but that could have been discovered by inspec- tion.
In a jurisdiction which tends to apply the traditional rules for the landowners and possessors of land, so from the following plaintiffs, the one which is the most likely to win is child who fell into the mineshaft.
A jurisdiction is considered to be an area which is with a set of laws under the control of a system of the courts or government entity and so which are said to be different from the neighbouring areas.
However, from th given plaintiffs, the child who fell into the mineshaft is the one who is most likely to win. This is because under the attractive nuisance doctrine, a child trespasser who is seen to be injured by a dangerous artificial condition need not have been attracted onto the property.
To learn more about the jurisdiction here:
https://brainly.com/question/14179714
#SPJ4
the zero tolerance law does not provide for an administrative suspension of your driving privilege if you are under 21 years of age and have a blood or breath alcohol concentration of .02 or greater.a) trueb) false
True. Zero tolerance laws are laws that prohibit drivers under the age of 21 from driving with any measurable amount of alcohol in their blood.
The purpose of these laws is to reduce the number of alcohol-related accidents caused by young drivers. In this context, "zero tolerance" means that if a person under the age of 21 is found to have any measurable amount of alcohol in their blood, they will face penalties, including administrative suspension of their driving privilege, fines, and possibly jail time. But these penalties vary from state to state.
Learn more about zero tolerance here:
https://brainly.com/question/3731612
#SPJ4
in the 1898 case of plessy v. ferguson, the supreme court ruled that a louisiana law that required african american and white passengers to sit in different rail cars did not violate the constitution. which legal doctrine was established by this case?
“separate but equal” doctrine was established in the 1898 case of plessy v. ferguson, the supreme court ruled that a louisiana law that required african american and white passengers to sit in different rail cars did not violate the constitution.
In a famous 1896 case known as Plessy v. Ferguson, the U.S. Supreme Court maintained the "separate but equal" principle's justification for racial segregation. African American railway passenger Homer Plessy's refusal to seat in a car designated for Black people in 1892 served as the impetus for the case.
In a famous ruling known as Plessy v. Ferguson, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the "separate but equal" principle, which stated that racial segregation laws were constitutional as long as they provided equal access to amenities. Several state statutes that had been passed in the American South following the end of the Reconstruction era to reinstate racial segregation were given legal standing by the ruling.
For such more questions about Separate but equal:
brainly.com/question/8425425
#SPJ4
Marcie works at a large law firm and is an introvert. In which of the following situations would Marcie feel most comfortable?
A. Attending a national legal conference
B. Presenting at the weekly company-wide meeting
C. Dancing at the firm's annual Christmas party
D. Preparing documents to submit to the court
Answer:
D.
Explanation:
Because he can work alone before he gets to meetings and presenting. He will feel more comfortable by himself.
Shakila’s husband, David, had vomited after having dinner at a local restaurant. Shakila then brought him to Hospital Suredie for treatment. It was 1.00 a.m. in the morning and there was no doctor on duty. The assistant nurse on duty had called Dr. Quack Nicholson, who was the doctor in charge, for instructions. Dr. Quack instructed the nurse to tell the patient to go home and consult his own personal physician in the morning. Shakila’s husband died later the next day. The cause of death was diagnosed as a chronic disease and he would have died anyway, even if Dr. Quack had treated him.
Advise Shakila whether she can successfully sue Hospital Suredie and Dr Quack for negligence.
Answer:
Explanation:
It is difficult to say whether Shakila can successfully sue Hospital Suredie and Dr. Quack for negligence without more information about the specific circumstances of the case and the laws in the jurisdiction in which the incident occurred.
In general, for a negligence case to be successful, it must be proven that the defendants had a duty of care to the patient, that this duty of care was breached, and that this breach caused harm to the patient.
In this case, it could be argued that the hospital and Dr. Quack had a duty of care to David as a patient seeking medical treatment. However, it is also stated that there was no doctor on duty and the cause of death was diagnosed as a chronic disease and he would have died anyway, even if Dr. Quack had treated him. This information suggests that the death may not have been preventable and that there may not have been a breach of the duty of care.
It would be advisable for Shakila to consult with a lawyer experienced in medical malpractice cases to determine the specific laws and regulations that may apply in her case and to evaluate the strength of her potential legal claim.
Willis music oh advertise a television set $22.50 in the Sunday newspaper ehrlich ordered a set but the company refuse to deliver it on the grounds that the price in the newspaper ad was a mistake. Ehrlich sued the company. was it liable? Why or why not
The lawsuit's jurisdiction and circumstances will determine the company's liability. If a firm committed an advertisement error recklessly or with the aim to mislead consumers, it may be responsible. If the corporation is responsible, engage an attorney.
What is Willis's music?Generally, Whether or not the company is liable in this situation would depend on the specific circumstances and laws in the jurisdiction where the lawsuit is taking place.
In general, a company may be held liable for a mistake in advertising if it is determined that the mistake was made negligently or with intent to deceive customers.
However, if the mistake was made in good faith and was an honest mistake, the company may not be held liable
Additionally, if the advertisement clearly states that prices are subject to change or that mistakes may occur, the company may have a stronger defense against liability.
It would be best to consult with an attorney to determine if the company is liable in this case.
Read more about Willis music
https://brainly.com/question/28000528
#SPJ1
You are on patrol as a cop, you see a known gang member's pink 4-door Sedan. It was used in the murder of another police officer. How do you react in this situation? Answer as a roleplay please and it’s a senario
Police officers need to act and remain calm in this situation. If I could, I would surround the automobile and make a backup call. I would then slowly go up to the vehicle and tell everyone to get out holding hands.
What is the circumstance?In general, it's critical for a police officer to maintain composure and behave appropriately in this circumstance.
I would, if at all possible, make a backup call and set up a barrier around the car. I would then cautiously approach the car, having my gun ready, and issue verbal orders to everyone inside to escape with their hands up.
I would use force as required to protect my safety and the safety of others if the passengers refused to cooperate or made any rash moves. I would lock the car after the people inside are securely in my care and then wait for further units to show up.
The car would be examined for evidence, and its passengers would be interrogated and prosecuted if appropriate in connection with the police officer's murder.
Learn more about homicide
https://brainly.com/question/28941392
#SPJ1
Which of the following constitutional provisions empowered the LGBT movement and culminated in same-sex marriage being declared constitutional by the U.S. Supreme Court?O Fourteenth AmendmentO Fourth AmendmentO Fourteenth Amendment—equal protection under the lawO The Fourteenth Amendment
The Fourteenth Amendment required a State to license a marriage between two people of the same sex.
The fourteenth amendment recognized a marriage between two people of the same sex even when their marriage was lawfully licensed and performed out-of-State.
In 2015, the Supreme Court Of USA ruled in the landmark civil rights case of Obergefell v. Hodges. It is a legal case in which the U.S. Supreme Court ruled by a majority of 5-4 stated that state bans on same-sex marriage is not illegal and it further duly recognized same-sex marriages that are performed in other jurisdictions that were earlier recognized as unconstitutional under the due process and equal protection clauses are now legal under the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. The Supreme court invalidated all such amendment that banned same-sex marriage.
To know more about same sex marriage refer to-
brainly.com/question/20795411#
#SPJ4
Correct question
Which constitutional provisions empower the LGBT movement and culminate in same-sex marriage being declared constitutional by the U.S. Supreme Court?
In which situation is it legal for a minor to purchase alcohol?
It is generally illegal for a minor to purchase alcohol, with exceptions for religious ceremonies, with a parent or guardian, or in certain states with lower drinking age laws.
In most situations, it is illegal for a minor to purchase alcohol .In the United States, the legal drinking age is 21, and it is illegal for anyone under that age to purchase or possess alcohol. There are a few limited exceptions to this rule, such as when a minor is purchasing alcohol as part of a religious ceremony or when a minor is accompanied by a parent or legal guardian and is purchasing alcohol for that parent or legal guardian.
It is also legal for a minor to purchase and consume alcohol if they are in certain states that have different drinking age laws, for example, in some states, the drinking age is 18 for beer and wine and 21 for spirits.
Additionally, it is legal for a minor to purchase and consume alcohol if they are in a restaurant or other establishment that serves alcohol and the minor is accompanied by a parent or legal guardian.
To know more about Alcohol click below:
https://brainly.com/question/9582772#
#SPJ4
One part of an iron triangle gives the government information about a certain issue. It also encourages lawmakers to draft legislation to help its cause, sometimes through making campaign donations to congress members.
Increasing the budget and power of the bureaucracy to control the industry is one important contact that congress has with the bureaucracy as part of the iron triangle.
The alliance between the legislative part of the U.S. government (Congress), its bureaucratic agencies, and special interests is usually referred to as the "Iron Triangle." Legislation must be proposed and passed by Congress.
The members will need to raise a sizeable sum of money to support the re-election campaign in order to accomplish that. The duty of ensuring that laws, regulations, and policies are being obeyed falls to bureaucratic agencies. Because they are reliant on Congress for financing, Congress can give the bureaucracy more money and power.
To learn more about the Key part of Iron Triangle,
https://brainly.com/question/29832939
#SPJ4
Which of the following correctly describes the main reasons for freshwater withdrawals in the United States (surface water and groundwater combined), in order from the greatest to least amount of water withdrawn annually
The main reasons for freshwater withdrawals in the United States (surface water and groundwater combined), in order from the greatest to least amount of water withdrawn annually are:
Thermoelectric power generation (cooling water for power plants)IrrigationPublic water supply (drinking and domestic use)LivestockIndustrial use (such as manufacturing and mining)Aquaculture Please note that this ranking may vary depending on the region of the country and it is based on the data available until 2021.Learn more about freshwater withdrawals here:
https://brainly.com/question/1652768
#SPJ4
Can alcohol be served at 6am in Michigan
Answer:
No
Explanation:
In michigan(where i use to live) you can not be served or serve alcohol before 10am
David purchased an immediate annuity with a single $50,000 premium payment. He elects to receive income payments on a quarterly basis. When will his income begin?
David's income, given the income payments on a quarterly basis, will begin in three months time.
What is a quarterly annuity ?A quarterly annuity is a type of investment or savings plan that pays out fixed amounts of money on a regular basis, typically every three months (quarterly). The payments, or annuities, can be made to a single individual or to a group of individuals, such as in the case of a pension plan.
Quarterly annuities can be either deferred or immediate. Deferred annuities allow an individual to make regular contributions over a period of time before the payments begin, while immediate annuities begin payments immediately after the initial lump-sum investment is made.
Quarterly annuities can also be either fixed or variable. A fixed annuity pays out a guaranteed amount of money, while a variable annuity's payments fluctuate based on the performance of the underlying investments. David's income will therefore begin in three months.
Find out more on annuities at https://brainly.com/question/14908942
#SPJ1
What is the balance of power?
OA process that allows states to prevent other states from dominating the system
O Both of the above.
O None of the above
O An outcome that creates equilibrium among states
Answer:
Both of the above
Explanation:
The balance of power – the idea that states consciously or unconsciously strive towards an equal distribution of power to avoid dominance by one
if a licensee has fiduciary duties to obey all lawful instructions from a client and also to exercise reasonable skill and care, which answer describes a situation in which there is a conflict between the two fiduciary duties?
Ronna's responsibility of reasonable care and skill preempts her obligation of allegiance to Jefferson, her client.
The connection between a fiduciary as well as the principal and beneficiary as to whose behalf a fiduciary acts is referred to as fiduciary obligation. When acting in the best interests of such a beneficiary, the fiduciary takes legal responsibility for responsibilities such as care, loyalty, good faith, secrecy, and others. Strict precautions must be taken to ensure that neither conflict of interest emerges, putting such interests at risk. A fiduciary obligation entails acting in the best interests of yet another individual or company.
Fiduciary obligation refers to the connection that exists between an attorney and a client, or between a guardian and a ward. The duty of care, devotion, good faith, secrecy, prudence, and disclosure are all examples of fiduciary obligations. There has been successfully argued that even an employee may owe an employer a fiduciary responsibility of loyalty. Whenever a fiduciary declines to behave responsibly with in best interests of either a client, this is considered a violation of fiduciary responsibility.
To know more about the Fiduciary duties, here
https://brainly.com/question/30264882
#SPJ4
You are on patrol as a cop, you see a known gang member's pink 4-door Sedan. It was used in the murder of another police officer. How do you react in this situation?
In this case, police officers must be cool and act. If feasible, I would call for backup and surround the car. I would then cautiously approach the car and order everybody inside to emerge with their hands up.
What is the situation?Generally, As a police officer, it is important to remain calm and take appropriate action in this situation.
If possible, I would call for backup and establish a perimeter around the vehicle. I would then approach the vehicle with caution, keeping my firearm at the ready, and give verbal commands to anyone inside to exit the vehicle with their hands up.
If the occupants refuse to comply or make any sudden movements, I would use force as necessary to ensure my safety and the safety of others. Once the occupants are safely in custody, I would secure the vehicle and wait for additional units to arrive.
The vehicle would be processed for evidence, and the occupants would be questioned and charged as necessary in relation to the murder of the police officer.
Read more about murder
https://brainly.com/question/3105578
#SPJ1
What explanations have been offered for why Latino and African-American people have a disproportionately high representation in arrest and incarceration rates?
Answer:
Many explanations have been offered for why Latino and African-American people have a disproportionately high representation in arrest and incarceration rates. These explanations include racial profiling, socioeconomic disparities, and systemic discrimination. Racial profiling is the practice of law enforcement disproportionately targeting people of color for investigation and arrest. Socioeconomic disparities refer to the fact that people of color are more likely to be living in poverty, which can lead to higher rates of crime and incarceration. Systemic discrimination refers to the way that the criminal justice system has been designed in a way that disadvantages people of color, including through harsher sentencing, higher bail amounts, and more frequent stops and searches.
Explanation:
To supplement (compile) the list of documents for the period 2019-2022. (using information from official websites):
1) Regulatory and legal regulation of project activities in the OIV of the Russian Federation (2019-2022);
2) Methodological recommendations on projects in the Russian Federation (2019-2022);
3) Regional regulatory legal acts and methodological recommendations (Krasnodar Territory)
Answer:
Here you can find various types of Commission documents such as proposals, impact assessments, communications, delegated and implementing acts and other Commission decisions, agendas and minutes of meetings held by the College of Commissioners.
Explanation:
Hope It Helps
Which case established judicial review which gave supreme court power to declare laws unconstitutional?
A criticism of interest-group pluralism is its class bias in favor of those with greater financial resources.
The best description of the ideal of pluralism is that interests should be free to compete with each other for governmental influence.
When a renown political scientist said, "The heavenly chorus of interest groups sing with a distinctly upper class accent," he meant that
the theory of pluralism ignores the fact that the wealthy are better organized than the poor.
The Teamsters and the AFL-CIO are examples of what kind of interest group?
a labor group
The National League of Cities is a good example of a public sector interest group.
Approximately how many members does the AARP have?
35,000,000
Interest groups most effectively serve
the upper classes.
What are political parties more capable of doing than interest groups?
organizing people on a massive scale
Which of the following are lobbyists NOT required by federal law to disclose?
All of the above must be publicly disclosed.
(who they are working for; how much they are paid; who they are lobbying)
What is the most important and beneficial resource that lobbyists provide government officials?
information
When interest groups take out advertisements and hold marches, these are examples of
mobilizing public opinion.
In recent years, the religious Right has had great affect on American politics through
grassroots mobilization.
What is the primary function of a political action committee?
to raise and distribute money to election campaigns
The fact that interest groups favor the wealthy and well educated can be understood as a reflection of what eternal dilemma in American politics?
Liberty is often inconsistent with equality. What contemporary political scientists call an interest group, James Madison called a/an
faction.
Interest groups, also known as factions, are organizations with a common interest that seek to influence government policies or decisions.
They are not explicitly part of the government, but they often act as a form of representative democracy by allowing citizens to have a voice in the political process.
Interest groups can be beneficial in that they help bring attention to specific issues, mobilize public opinion, and provide information to government officials.
However, they can also be problematic in that they often favor the wealthy and well-educated and are therefore biased in favor of the upper classes. This unequal representation can undermine the principles of democracy and create a lack of accountability in government. Ultimately, interest groups can be both beneficial and problematic, depending on how they are utilized and who benefits from their influence.
Learn more about factions:
https://brainly.com/question/25628707
#SPJ4
According to Justice Stevens in Clinton v. Jones, when does the president not have immunity from civil damages litigation
According to Justice Stevens in Clinton v. Jones, the president not have immunity from civil damages litigation in federal civil litigation.
The Constitution of USA does not protect the President from federal civil suit involving the actions committed by the president before entering into the office. As such there is no requirement to stay the case related to civil suit until the President leaves office.
The question involved in this case was whether a serving President because of separation of powers reasons is entitled to absolute immunity from civil litigation arising out of events which occurred prior to his taking office?
In an unanimous opinion, the Supreme Court held that the Constitution does not grant the sitting President any immunity from civil litigation except under highly unusual and special circumstances.
To know more about Clinton v Jones refer to-
brainly.com/question/542741#
#SPJ4
true/false. The citizenship clause of the Fourteenth Amendment says a naturalized person is not a citizen and cannot become a citizen of the United States. is a citizen, just like someone who was born in the United States. must have been born in the United States, not in another country. must have been born in a country other than the United States.
False. The citizenship clause of the Fourteenth Amendment says that all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction.
The Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, ratified in 1868, addresses citizenship rights and equal protection under the law. It includes the Citizenship Clause, which states that all persons born or naturalized in the United States are citizens. It also includes the Due Process Clause and the Equal Protection Clause, which provide constitutional protection for individual rights and prohibit discrimination. The amendment was adopted in the aftermath of the American Civil War to secure rights for former slaves.
Learn more about Fourteenth Amendment here:
https://brainly.com/question/29371683
#SPJ4
true/false. Trade policies have both positive and negative consequences to businesses, consumers, and governments. A company in Japan recently proposed a revolutionary new concept for home washing machines that could make all other forms of washing machines obsolete. As a result, other countries may impose a quota on the imports of washing machines from Japan.
True. Trade policies have both positive and negative consequences to businesses, consumers, and governments. Trade policies can help protect domestic industries from foreign competition.
A company in Japan recently proposed a revolutionary new concept for home washing machines could be a positive consequence for the company, but it may also lead to negative consequences for other domestic companies in the same industry. As a result, other countries may impose a quota on the imports of washing machines from Japan to protect their domestic industries, which would negatively affect the Japanese company and its ability to export its new product.
Learn more about trade policies here:
https://brainly.com/question/27622280
#SPJ4
Why should epileptics not be allowed to use the defence of automatism in the case of a car accident? Explain your opinion.
Epileptics should not be allowed to use the defense of automatism in the case of a car accident because it is generally considered that they have a duty to take reasonable care to prevent harm to others while operating a vehicle.
What does the term "Epileptic automatisms" mean?Epileptic automatisms refers to 'insane automatisms, which cause a person who commits a crime during the course of a seizure to be declared legally insane and must be committed to a psychiatric hospital. The law of insanity is inappropriate when applied to epileptic automatisms.
As it is considered that they have a duty to take reasonable care to prevent harm to others while operating a vehicle. Then, there are steps to be taken to prevent or manage seizures while driving, such as taking prescribed medication and avoiding triggers that may induce seizures.
Read more about Epileptic
brainly.com/question/28131457
#SPJ1
Broker Jane has been accused of violating commission-related laws. Which could cause him to be found guilty?
Answer: Jane paid a commission to a Florida licensee who is not licensed in Georgia, for licensing activity in Georgia.
Explanation:
That the freedom of speech and debates or proceedings in Parliament ought not to be impeached or questioned in any court or place out of Parliament. According to this excerpt, members of Parliament are allowed to practice any religion they choose. have a trial by jury. communicate opinions and ideas. share power with the monarchy.
According to this excerpt, members of Parliament are allowed to practice any religion they choose. communicate opinions and ideas.
What is the excerpt?In writing, an excerpt is a passage that is quoted from a larger work, like a book, poem, or article. Excerpts can be used to "display" to readers what you want them to learn and remember about the issue, regardless of your writing's subject or the style you want to use.
Through communication, The exchange and the flow of information, Fact or opinions, and ideas from one person to Another person. It involves a sender transmitting the message or feeling to a receiver
Therefore, Thus option (C) is correct.
Learn more about the excerpt here:
https://brainly.com/question/29708851
#SPJ1
Answer: [answer is C]
Explanation:
Which is the essential elements of a political party Mcq?
The essential elements of a political party usually include a political leader, who has the primary responsibility for the activities of the part.
A political party is considered to be essential as when the electorate expanded, the political parties evolved in order to mobilize the growing mass of voters which was as the means of political control. Thus, then the political parties became institutionalized to accomplish this essential task.
However, a political party includes a political leader who is made up of individuals and who tends to organize in order to win elections, operate the government, and as well as influence the public policy.
To learn more about a political party here:
https://brainly.com/question/29545298
#SPJ4
which kind of organizations grew because of new deal legislation that supported and protected them?
The type of organisations that formed as a result of the New Deal's legislation supporting and protecting them are labour unions.
What exactly is a New Deal law?
The Additional Deal included further controls and protections for the banking industry as well as efforts to stimulate the economy after prices had fallen sharply. The New Deal projects were implemented during Franklin D. Roosevelt's first term as president and comprised both congressionally authorised legislation and administrative decrees.
The Fair Labor Standards Act, sometimes referred to as the Wages and Hours Act, was the first law in the United States to establish consistent, federally-mandated wage and hour regulation on a nationwide level.
For such more question on Organization.
https://brainly.com/question/25922351
#SPJ4
why are pretrial hearings necessary, especially if both parties have pursued the lawsuit with full knowledge?
Pre-trial discovery is routinely utilized to make sure that all parties to a dispute are aware of each other's views and have access to all pertinent information.
By doing this, it is ensured that the facts, not whether specific information has been concealed, are used to resolve legal issues. Facilitating lawsuit settlement is one of the pre-trial hearings' primary goals. By doing this, both parties avoid incurring significant legal expenses.
By avoiding jaw-dropper, discovery aims to level the playing field in court. In order for the prosecution and defense to prepare arguments based on the arguments of the other side, information must be provided prior to the rehearsal.
To learn more about pretrial hearings rights,
https://brainly.com/question/11625824
#SPJ4
Which relative did not have to live in the household as the tax per claim head of household filing status the parrot the grandparent cousin or the sibling
The parrot did not have to live in the household as the tax per claim head of household filing status. Option A
What is household filing status.?Generally, Household filing status refers to the way in which a person files their tax return based on their family situation, including marital status, dependents, and living arrangements.
The most common household filing statuses are single, married filing jointly, married filing separately, and head of household.
The choice of household filing status can impact the amount of taxes owed and the eligibility for certain tax benefits.
Read more about household filing status.
https://brainly.com/question/29994814
#SPJ1
