The probability of choosing all five white balls correctly from a bowl of 69 white balls and the probability of choosing the correct red ball from a bowl of 29 red balls is [tex]{}^{69}C_5/29[/tex] .
The probability of choosing all five white balls correctly can be calculated using the formula for combinations, where the order does not matter and the balls are chosen without replacement. The probability is given by:
P(Choosing all 5 white balls correctly) = (Number of ways to choose 5 white balls correctly) / (Total number of possible combinations)
The number of ways to choose 5 white balls correctly is 1, as there is only one correct combination.
The total number of possible combinations can be calculated using the formula for combinations, where we choose 5 balls out of 69. It is given by:
Total number of combinations = [tex]{}^{69}C_5[/tex]
Next, we need to calculate the probability of choosing the correct red ball from a bowl of 29 red balls. Since there is only one correct red ball, the probability is 1/29.
Finally, to find the likelihood of being the winner of the Powerball lottery, we multiply the probability of choosing all five white balls correctly by the probability of choosing the correct red ball:
Likelihood = P(Choosing all 5 white balls correctly) * P(Choosing correct red ball)
=[tex]{}^{69}C_5 \times 1/29\\[/tex]
This gives us the probability of being the winner of the Powerball lottery.
Learn more about probability here:
https://brainly.com/question/32117953
#SPJ11
Question 2 (5 points) The equation that models the amount of time t, in minutes, that a bowl of soup has been cooling as a function of its temperature T, in °C, log (T-15) is t - . Round answers to 2
The equation that models the amount of time t, in minutes, that a bowl of soup has been cooling as a function of its temperature T, in °C, is given by t = log(T - 15).
The given equation t = log(T - 15) represents the relationship between the cooling time of a bowl of soup and its temperature. The equation uses the logarithmic function to calculate the time based on the temperature of the soup minus 15 degrees Celsius.
Logarithmic functions are useful in modeling phenomena where there is exponential decay or diminishing returns. In this case, as the temperature of the soup decreases, the rate at which it cools down gradually decreases as well. The logarithm allows us to capture this relationship by mapping the temperature to the cooling time.
By subtracting 15 from the temperature T, we adjust the scale so that the logarithm is defined only for positive values. This is because the logarithm function is undefined for negative numbers and zero. The resulting value is then passed through the logarithmic function, which compresses the range of values and provides a measure of the cooling time.
The logarithm function in this equation provides a way to quantify the relationship between temperature and cooling time. As the temperature decreases, the logarithm will approach negative infinity, indicating a longer cooling time. Conversely, as the temperature increases, the logarithm will approach positive infinity, representing a shorter cooling time.
By using this equation, we can estimate the cooling time of the soup based on its temperature, helping us understand the behavior of the cooling process more accurately.
Learn more about Logarithmic functions
brainly.com/question/30339782
#SPJ11
5. If E(X) = 20 and E(X²) = 449, use Chebyshev's inequality to determine (a) A lower bound for P(11 < X < 29). (b) An upper bound for P(|X-20| ≥ 14).
The lower bound for P(11 < X < 29) is approximately 0.386, and the upper bound for P(|X - 20| ≥ 14) is 0.25.
According to Chebyshev's inequality, for any random variable X with mean μ and variance σ², the probability that X deviates from its mean by more than k standard deviations is at most 1/k². In this case, we are given that E(X) = 20 and E(X²) = 449. Using these values, we can calculate the variance as Var(X) = E(X²) - [E(X)]²= 449 - 20²= 449 - 400 = 49.
(a) To find a lower bound for P(11 < X < 29), we first calculate the standard deviation σ which is √49 = 7. Then we find the difference between the mean and the lower bound, which is 11 - 20 = -9. Dividing this by σ gives us -9/7 ≈ -1.29. Since we want a lower bound, we take the absolute value, so k = 1.29. Using Chebyshev's inequality, we have P(11 < X < 29) ≥ 1 - 1/k² = 1 - 1/1.29² ≈ 1 - 0.614 = 0.386.
(b) To determine an upper bound for P(|X - 20| ≥ 14), we consider the absolute difference between X and the mean, which is |X - 20|. We want this difference to be greater than or equal to 14. Thus, we have |X - 20| ≥ 14, which is equivalent to X ≥ 34 or X ≤ 6. The deviation from the mean in this case is 34 - 20 = 14 or 6 - 20 = -14. Dividing these deviations by the σ 14/7 = 2 or -14/7 = -2, gives us k = 2. Using Chebyshev's inequality, we have P(|X - 20| ≥ 14) ≤ 1/k²= 1/2² = 1/4 = 0.25.
Learn more about probability click here:
brainly.com/question/31828911
#SPJ11
If the F test for the overall significance of a multiple regression model turns out to be statistically significant, it means that each one of the regression coefficients (β coefficients) is different from zero (True/False).
True: because A significant F test implies that each regression coefficient in a multiple regression model is different from zero.
What does a statistically significant F test indicate in a multiple regression model?
If the F test for overall significance of multiple regression model is statistically significant, it indicates that each regression coefficient (β coefficient) is different from zero.
The F test assesses the joint significance of all the coefficients, determining if the model effectively explains the variability of the dependent variable.
A significant F test suggests that at least one independent variable is related to the dependent variable, implying differences in each regression coefficient.
By comparing the variability explained by the regression model to unexplained variability, the F test evaluates the overall fit of the model.
If the test statistic surpasses the critical value at a chosen significance level, such as 0.05 or 0.01, the null hypothesis is rejected, signifying a substantial overall effect of the model.
Therefore, a statistically significant F test confirms the importance of each regression coefficient and supports the model's ability to explain the dependent variable.
Learn more about regression
brainly.com/question/32505018
#SPJ11
Which expression represents "four less than six times the sum of a number and seven?" desmos Virginia Standards of Learning Version a. 4 - 6n + 7 b. 4-6(n+7) c. 6n+7- 4 d. 6 (n+7)-4
The expression that represents "four less than six times the sum of a number and seven" is 6n + 7 - 4. Option c is correct.
Let x be the number. The sum of the number and seven is (x + 7). Six times the sum of a number and seven is expressed as 6(x + 7), and four less than six times the sum of a number and seven is given as 6(x + 7) - 4.The simplified expression of 6(x + 7) - 4 is as follows:6(x + 7) - 46x + 42 - 4 = 6x + 38Therefore, 6n + 7 - 4 represents "four less than six times the sum of a number and seven." Thus, option c is correct.
To know more about number. visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30169290
#SPJ11
express the confidence interval 0.111 p 0.999 in the form p±e
Therefore, the confidence interval in the form p ± e is 0.555 ± 0.444.
To express the confidence interval 0.111 p 0.999 in the form p ± e, we need to determine the midpoint (p) and the margin of error (e).
The midpoint (p) is the average of the lower and upper bounds of the confidence interval:
p = (0.111 + 0.999) / 2
= 0.555
The margin of error (e) is half of the width of the confidence interval:
e = (0.999 - 0.111) / 2
= 0.444
To know more about confidence interval,
https://brainly.com/question/29272750
#SPJ11
Find the volume of the solid above the paraboloid z = x^2 + y^2 and below the half-cone z = square root x^2 + y^2.
The half-cone z = √(x² + y²) is 2π/3 cubic units.
The given function is,
z = x² + y² The solid is above the paraboloid and below the half-cone. Hence, the limits of the volume are given as follows.
To find the region of integration 0 ≤ z ≤ √(x²+y²) and 0 ≤ z ≤ x²+y² :
Let's compare the two equations for z: z = x² + y² and
z = √(x² + y²).
If we square both sides of the second equation.
we get: z² = x² + y² Squaring both sides of the second equation will give us the following equation, z² = x²+y².
The limits of x and y are from −z to z.
So the limits of integration are from 0 to 1 and from 0 to 2π respectively. Hence, the volume of the solid above the paraboloid
z = x² + y² and
below the half-cone z = √(x² + y²) is given by the following integral:
V = ∫₀^²π∫₀^¹ z² dzdθ
= ∫₀^²π [(1/3)z³]₀¹ dzdθ
= ∫₀^²π [1/3] dθ
= 2π/3 cubic units
Thus, the volume of the solid above the paraboloid z = x² + y² and below the half-cone z = √(x² + y²) is 2π/3 cubic units.
to know more about cubic units visit:
https://brainly.com/question/4388834
#SPJ11
1-Solve this question
a- A calculator operates on two 1.5-V batteries (for a total of 3V). The actual
voltage of a battery is normally distributed with μ = 1.5 and σ2 = 0.45. The
tolerances in the design of the calculator are such that it will not operate satisfactorily
if the total voltage falls outside the range 2.70–3.30 V. What is the
probability that the calculator will function correctly?
b- Let X be a continuous random variable denoting the time to failure of a component. Suppose the distribution function of X is F(x). Use this distribution function to express the probability of the following events: (a) 9 90, given that X > 9
c- assume that x=Final result of a , y= final result of b, find the avg
To find the probability that the calculator will function correctly, we need to calculate the probability that the total voltage falls within the range of 2.70-3.30 V.
Let X1 and X2 be the voltages of the two batteries. Since they are independent and normally distributed, the sum of their voltages follows a normal distribution as well.
The mean of the sum is μ1 + μ2 = 1.5 + 1.5 = 3 V.
The variance of the sum is σ1^2 + σ2^2 = 0.45 + 0.45 = 0.9.
The standard deviation of the sum is the square root of the variance, which is √0.9 ≈ 0.949 V.
To calculate the probability, we need to standardize the range of 2.70-3.30 V using the mean and standard deviation:
Z1 = (2.70 - 3) / 0.949 ≈ -0.314
Z2 = (3.30 - 3) / 0.949 ≈ 0.314
Using the standard normal distribution table or a calculator, we can find the cumulative probabilities associated with Z1 and Z2:
P(Z < -0.314) ≈ 0.3781
P(Z < 0.314) ≈ 0.6281
The probability that the calculator will function correctly is the difference between these two probabilities:
P(2.70 ≤ X1 + X2 ≤ 3.30) ≈ 0.6281 - 0.3781 = 0.25
Therefore, there is a 25% probability that the calculator will function correctly.
The probability that X > 9 can be expressed as 1 - F(9), where F(x) is the distribution function of X. This probability represents the complement of the cumulative probability up to x = 9.
P(X > 9) = 1 - F(9)
Learn more about normal distribution here:
https://brainly.com/question/15103234
#SPJ11
The number of requests reaching an e-mail server per second has a Poisson distribution with a mean of 2.3. Calculate the followings: 2.1 The probability of receiving no request in the next second? 2.2 The probability of receiving less than 3 requests in the next second? 2.3 The probability of receiving more than 1 request in the next second? 2.4 E(X)? 2.5 Var(X)?
2.1 The probability of receiving no request in the next second is given by P(X = 0) = e-λλ^x / x!where
λ = 2.3, x = 0P(X = 0)
e-2.3(2.3^0 / 0!)≈ 0.1003
2.2The probability of receiving less than 3 requests in the next second is given by
P(X < 3) = P(X = 0) + P(X = 1) + P(X = 2)where
λ = 2.3P(X = 0) = e-2.3(2.3^0 / 0!)≈ 0.1003P(X = 1)
= e-2.3(2.3^1 / 1!)≈ 0.2303P(X = 2)
= e-2.3(2.3^2 / 2!)≈ 0.2646P(X < 3)
= 0.1003 + 0.2303 + 0.2646≈ 0.5952
Therefore, the probability of receiving less than 3 requests in the next second is approximately 0.5952.2.3 The probability of receiving more than 1 request in the next second is given by
P(X > 1) = 1 - P(X ≤ 1)where
λ = 2.3P(X ≤ 1)
= P(X = 0) + P(X = 1)P(X ≤ 1)
= e-2.3(2.3^0 / 0!) + e-2.3(2.3^1 / 1!)≈ 0.3306P(X > 1)
= 1 - 0.3306≈ 0.6694
Therefore, the probability of receiving more than 1 request in the next second is approximately 0.6694.2.4 E(X) = λwhere λ = 2.3
Therefore, the expected value of X is 2.3.2.5 Var(X) = λwhere λ = 2.3Therefore, the variance of X is 2.3.
learn more about probability
https://brainly.com/question/13604758
#SPJ11
Problem 9. (10 pts)
Let
1
A 2 2 2 2
(a) (3pts) What is the rank of this matrix?
1 2 1 1
(b) (7pts) Assuming that rank is r, write the matrix A as
A = +...+uur.
for some (not necessarily orthonormal) vectors u1,..., ur, and v1,..., Ur. Hint: Do not try to compute SVD, there is a much simpler way by observation: find a rank one matrix u that looks "close" to A and the consider A-uu.
The answer based on matrix is (a) The rank of the matrix is 2. , (b) the matrix A is = [7, 6, 1, 1].
Let
a) The rank of the matrix is 2.
b) Considering the rank as r, we can write the matrix A as A = +...+uur, for some (not necessarily orthonormal) vectors u1,..., ur, and v1,..., Ur.
We know that the rank of the given matrix is 2.
It means that there must be two independent vectors in the rows or columns of A. We observe that columns 2 and 4 of the given matrix are linearly dependent on the first two columns. Hence, we can rewrite the matrix as:
We observe that the first two columns are linearly independent, which are u1 and u2.
Using these vectors, we can write the given matrix as A = u1vT1 + u2vT2, where vT1 and vT2 are row vectors.
A rank-one matrix can be written in this form, and we know that the rank of A is 2.
This means that there must be one more vector u3, and it is orthogonal to both u1 and u2.
We can compute it using the cross product of u1 and u2.
We get:
u3 = u1 × u2 = [2, -2, 0]T
Now we can compute vT1 and vT2 by finding the null space of the matrix formed by u1, u2, and u3.
We get:
vT1 = [-1, 0, 1, 0]andvT2 = [1, 1, 0, -1]
Finally, we can write the matrix A as A = u1vT1 + u2vT2 + u3vT3, where vT3 is a row vector given by:
vT3 = [0, -1, 0, 1]
Therefore, we have: A = (1, 2, 1, 1) (-1 0 1 0) + (2, 2, 2, 2) (1, 1, 0, -1) + (2, -2, 0, 0) (0, -1, 0, 1)= [3, 0, 1, -1]+ [4, 4, 2, 2]+ [0, 2, -2, 0]
= [7, 6, 1, 1]
To know more about matrix visit:
https://brainly.com/question/32622591
#SPJ11
When performing chi-square analyses, rather than working with
means, we are more concerned with ranks and percentages.
True
False
False. When performing chi-square analyses, we are not primarily concerned with ranks and percentages, but rather with observed and expected frequencies of categorical variables.
Chi-square analysis is a statistical test used to determine if there is a significant association between two categorical variables. It compares the observed frequencies of categories in a contingency table with the frequencies that would be expected if there was no association between the variables. The analysis involves comparing observed and expected frequencies rather than working with ranks and percentages.
In a chi-square test, the data are organized in a contingency table that displays the frequencies or counts of individuals falling into different categories of the variables being studied. The test calculates the chi-square statistic, which measures the discrepancy between the observed frequencies and the expected frequencies under the assumption of independence. By comparing the observed and expected frequencies, the test determines if there is a significant relationship between the variables.
To learn more about chi-square click here: brainly.com/question/32379532
#SPJ11
When your measurement error is between 4.5 and 5%, the number of cases are [____]. Select the correct answer below.
400
450
500
When your measurement error is between 4.5% and 5%, the number of cases is 450.
The margin of error (MOE) is a measure of the uncertainty or statistical error in a survey's findings. When it comes to determining the survey's accuracy, the MOE is the most important consideration. When determining the sample size required to generate the lowest MOE possible, the survey creator's decision comes into play.
Let us assume that a 95 percent confidence level is used in a survey of a population. The MOE will be larger if a more rigorous confidence level is employed.
Margin of Error = (Critical Value) x (Standard Deviation) / square root of (Sample Size)
If the population size is less than 100,000, the MOE equation is usually used.
The most commonly used equation is n = (Z2 * P * Q) / E2 if the population size is greater than 100,000.
Hence, when the measurement error is between 4.5 and 5%, the number of cases is 450.
To know more about Standard Deviation visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29115611
#SPJ11
Consider the data points P₁ = (25, 31) P2 = (12, 3) and a query point Po = (30, 4) Which point would be more similar to po if you used the supremum distance as the proximity measure?
The point P₂ = (12, 3) would be more similar to Po = (30, 4) if the supremum distance is used as the proximity measure.
To determine this, we need to calculate the supremum distance between each data point (P₁ and P₂) and the query point Po. The supremum distance is the maximum difference between corresponding coordinates of two points.
For P₁ = (25, 31) and Po = (30, 4):
The difference in x-coordinates is |25 - 30| = 5.
The difference in y-coordinates is |31 - 4| = 27.
The supremum distance between P₁ and Po is 27.
For P₂ = (12, 3) and Po = (30, 4):
The difference in x-coordinates is |12 - 30| = 18.
The difference in y-coordinates is |3 - 4| = 1.
The supremum distance between P₂ and Po is 18.
Since the supremum distance between P₂ and Po is larger (18) than the supremum distance between P₁ and Po (27), we conclude that P₂ is more similar to Po when using the supremum distance as the proximity measure.
To learn more about supremum click here:
brainly.com/question/30967807
#SPJ11
The point P₂ = (12, 3) would be more similar to Po = (30, 4) if the supremum distance is used as the proximity measure.
To determine this, we need to calculate the supremum distance between each data point (P₁ and P₂) and the query point Po. The supremum distance is the maximum difference between corresponding coordinates of two points.
For P₁ = (25, 31) and Po = (30, 4):
The difference in x-coordinates is |25 - 30| = 5.
The difference in y-coordinates is |31 - 4| = 27.
The supremum distance between P₁ and Po is 27.
For P₂ = (12, 3) and Po = (30, 4):
The difference in x-coordinates is |12 - 30| = 18.
The difference in y-coordinates is |3 - 4| = 1.
The supremum distance between P₂ and Po is 18.
Since the supremum distance between P₂ and Po is larger (18) than the supremum distance between P₁ and Po (27), we conclude that P₂ is more similar to Po when using the supremum distance as the proximity measure.
To learn more about supremum click here:
brainly.com/question/30967807
#SPJ11
Solve: 2(4x − 1) = 10 − (x + 2). If there’s no solution, say
so.
Answer:
x=10/9
Step-by-step explanation:
2(4x - 1) = 10 - (x + 2)
8x - 2 = 10 - x - 2
8x - 2 = 8 - x
8x + x - 2 = 8 - x + x
9x - 2 = 8
9x - 2 + 2 = 8 + 2
9x = 10
(9x)/9 = 10/9
x = 10/9
Evaluate the integral by making an appropriate change of variables. ∫∫ R 3 cos(3 (y-x/ y+x)) dA where R is the trapezoidal region with vertices (7, 0), (9, 0), (0, 9), and (0, 7)
.....
To evaluate the given integral, we can make the change of variables u = y - x and v = y + x. This transformation allows us to convert the double integral in the xy-plane to a double integral in the uv-plane, simplifying the integration process.
To evaluate the given integral, we make the change of variables u = y - x and v = y + x. This transformation maps the region R in the xy-plane to a parallelogram region S in the uv-plane.To determine the new limits of integration in the uv-plane, we find the values of u and v corresponding to the vertices of region R. The vertices of R are (7, 0), (9, 0), (0, 9), and (0, 7). Substituting these points into the expressions for u and v, we get:
(7, 0) => u = 0 - 7 = -7, v = 0 + 7 = 7
(9, 0) => u = 0 - 9 = -9, v = 0 + 9 = 9
(0, 9) => u = 9 - 0 = 9, v = 9 + 0 = 9
(0, 7) => u = 7 - 0 = 7, v = 7 + 0 = 7
Therefore, the limits of integration in the uv-plane are -9 ≤ u ≤ 7 and 7 ≤ v ≤ 9.Next, we need to express the differential element dA in terms of du and dv. Using the chain rule, we have:dA = |(dx/dv)(dy/du)| du dv
Since x = (v - u)/2 and y = (v + u)/2, we can compute the partial derivatives:
dx/dv = 1/2
dy/du = 1/2
Substituting these derivatives into the expression for dA, we have:
dA = (1/2)(1/2) du dv = (1/4) du dv
Now, the original integral can be rewritten as:∫∫R 3cos(3(y - x)/(y + x)) dA
= ∫∫ S 3cos(3u/v) (1/4) du dv
Finally, we integrate over the region S with the new limits of integration (-9 ≤ u ≤ 7 and 7 ≤ v ≤ 9), evaluating the integral:∫∫ S 3cos(3u/v) (1/4) du dv
To learn more about parallelogram click here
brainly.com/question/32033686
#SPJ11
(20%) You are given the following costs of producing 2 products in 2 countries (see the table): Costs (hours of labour) Meat (1 ton) Cheese (1 ton) 30 10 Country A Country B 5 5 On the basis of the data
To maximize efficiency, Country B should specialize in Meat production, and Country A should specialize in Cheese production.
To determine the optimal production allocation between the two products (Meat and Cheese) and the two countries (Country A and Country B), we can use the concept of comparative advantage.
Comparative advantage refers to the ability of a country to produce a particular good or service at a lower opportunity cost compared to another country. The opportunity cost is measured in terms of the number of hours of labor required to produce each unit of a product.
To find the country with a comparative advantage in each product, we compare the opportunity costs between the two countries.
For Meat:
The opportunity cost of producing 1 ton of Meat in Country A is 30 hours of labor.
The opportunity cost of producing 1 ton of Meat in Country B is 10 hours of labor.
Since the opportunity cost of producing Meat is lower in Country B (10 hours) compared to Country A (30 hours), Country B has a comparative advantage in Meat production.
For Cheese:
The opportunity cost of producing 1 ton of Cheese in Country A is 5 hours of labor.
The opportunity cost of producing 1 ton of Cheese in Country B is 5 hours of labor.
Both countries have the same opportunity cost for Cheese production, so neither country has a comparative advantage in Cheese production.
Based on comparative advantage, Country B is better suited for producing Meat, while both countries are equally efficient in producing Cheese.
To maximize efficiency, Country B should specialize in Meat production, and Country A should specialize in Cheese production. This specialization allows each country to focus on producing the product in which they have a comparative advantage, leading to overall lower production costs and increased efficiency.
To know more about Product related question visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31815585
#SPJ11
calculate (413,465,789 mod 6), giving an answer between 0 and 5, and using a small number of steps. show your steps.
(413,465,789 mod 6) = 1.
Here's how to calculate (413,465,789 mod 6):
We start by observing that the number 6 is divisible by 2 and 3. As a result, we know that a number is divisible by 6 if it is divisible by both 2 and 3. We may tell if a number is divisible by 2 by looking at the final digit of the number in decimal representation. If the number is even (i.e., its last digit is 0, 2, 4, 6, or 8), it is divisible by 2. Otherwise, it is odd and not divisible by 2.The number 789 has a final digit of 9, which is not even. As a result, we know that 789 is not divisible by 2. As a result, 789 mod 2 must be 1 (since 789 is odd).Since 465 = 7 * 66 + 3, we can see that 465 is the same as 3 mod 7. As a result, we can say that 465 mod 7 = 3.Since 413 = 6 * 68 + 1, we can see that 413 is the same as 1 mod 6. As a result, we can say that 413 mod 6 = 1.Finally, since 1 mod 6 is the same as 1 + 6k for some integer k, we can say that 413,465,789 mod 6 is 1. Therefore, (413,465,789 mod 6) = 1.
To know more about mod
https://brainly.com/question/28065269
#SPJ11
Discrete math question please
8. Solve the recurrence relation. 2dn do = 4 = d₁ 11 8(dn-1 I d₁-2 )
The recurrence relation is 2dn do = 4 = d₁ 11 8(dn-1 I d₁-2)
To solve this recurrence relation, we need to find a closed-form expression for the sequence dn. Let's break down the given equation and analyze it step by step.
2dn do:
The left-hand side of the equation represents the term 2dn, which means the current term multiplied by 2.
d₁ 11 8(dn-1 I d₁-2):
The right-hand side of the equation represents a combination of terms involving d₁, dn-1, and d₁-2. Let's break it down further:
d₁: This represents the first term of the sequence, which is a constant.
11: This is a constant factor.
8: This is another constant factor.
(dn-1 I d₁-2): This is a ratio of the terms dn-1 and d₁-2.
Now, let's rewrite the given recurrence relation using the above analysis:
2dn = d₁ * 11 * 8 * (dn-1 / d₁-2) + 4
Next, we simplify the equation by canceling out common factors:
2dn = 88 * (dn-1 / d₁-2) + 4
To further simplify the equation, let's replace dn-1 / d₁-2 with a new variable, let's say x:
x = dn-1 / d₁-2
Now, we can rewrite the equation using x:
2dn = 88 * x + 4
This equation relates the term dn to the variable x. To solve the recurrence relation, we need to express dn in terms of dn-1, d₁-2, and the constants.
To know more about recurrence relation here
https://brainly.com/question/9521757
#SPJ4
Gert is buying floor tile to put in a room that is 3.5 yds ×
4yards. What is the area of the room in square feet? Show your
work. Include units in your work and result.
The area of the room is 168 square feet, obtained by multiplying the length (3.5 yards converted to 10.5 feet) by the width (4 yards converted to 12 feet).
To calculate the area of the room, we first need to convert the measurements from yards to feet. Since 1 yard is equal to 3 feet, the length of the room is 3.5 yards × 3 feet/yard = 10.5 feet, and the width is 4 yards × 3 feet/yard = 12 feet.
To find the area, we multiply the length by the width: 10.5 feet × 12 feet = 126 square feet.
Therefore, the area of the room is 126 square feet.
It's important to include units in our calculations to ensure accurate measurements and conversions. In this case, we converted the measurements from yards to feet to maintain consistency. By multiplying the length and width, we obtained the total area of the room in square feet, which is 126 square feet.
To learn more about Area calculation, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/2607596
#SPJ11
Find dy/dx by implicit differentiation.
y^5 + x^2y^3 = 4 + ye^x2
dy/dx=
To find dy/dx using implicit differentiation, we differentiate both sides of the equation y^5 + x^2y^3 = 4 + ye^x with respect to x.
Differentiating y^5 + x^2y^3 with respect to x using the chain rule:
(d/dx) (y^5) + (d/dx) (x^2y^3) = (d/dx) (4 + ye^x)
Using the chain rule and product rule, we get:
5y^4 (dy/dx) + 2xy^3 + 3x^2y^2 (dy/dx) = 0 + (dy/dx) (e^x) + ye^x
Simplifying the equation, we have:
5y^4 (dy/dx) + 2xy^3 + 3x^2y^2 (dy/dx) = (dy/dx) (e^x) + ye^x
Now, let's isolate the dy/dx term on one side of the equation:
5y^4 (dy/dx) + 3x^2y^2 (dy/dx) - (dy/dx) (e^x) = ye^x - 2xy^3
Factoring out dy/dx:
(dy/dx) (5y^4 + 3x^2y^2 - e^x) = ye^x - 2xy^3
Finally, we can solve for dy/dx by dividing both sides of the equation:
dy/dx = (ye^x - 2xy^3) / (5y^4 + 3x^2y^2 - e^x)
Therefore, the derivative dy/dx is given by (ye^x - 2xy^3) / (5y^4 + 3x^2y^2 - e^x).
Learn more about derivatives here: brainly.com/question/25324584
#SPJ11
derivative Calculate the by definition f(x) = XP-6X Зх
The derivative calculated by definition f(x) = XP-6X Зх is given as follows:We are required to determine the derivative of f(x) = XP-6X Зх by using the definition of derivative of a function, where:f'(x) = lim h→0 [f(x+h)−f(x)] / h.
Let's substitute the value of f(x) into the definition of derivative of the function:
f(x) = XP-6X Зх
Therefore, we have to find f'(x) by putting the value of f(x) in the definition of derivative of a function, as shown below:
[tex]f'(x) = lim h→0 [f(x+h)−f(x)] / h= lim h→0 [(x+h)P-6(x+h) Зх−XP-6X Зх] / h[/tex]
Next, let's expand (x+h)P using the binomial theorem:
[tex](x+h)P = XP + PXP-1h + P(P-1)/2! XP-2h² + P(P-1)(P-2)/3! XP-3h³ + . . .[/tex]
Therefore, we get:
[tex]f'(x) = lim h→0 [XP + PXP-1h + P(P-1)/2! XP-2h² + P(P-1)(P-2)/3! XP-3h³ + . . . - XP-6X Зх] / h[/tex]
Next, we need to simplify the above expression by cancelling the XP from the numerator and denominator:
[tex]f'(x) = lim h→0 [XP (1 + PXP-1h/XP + P(P-1)/2! XP-2h²/XP + P(P-1)(P-2)/3! XP-3h³/XP + . . .) - XP-6X Зх] / h[/tex]
=f'(x) = lim h→0 [XP {1 + PXP-1h/XP + P(P-1)/2! XP-2h²/XP + P(P-1)(P-2)/3! XP-3h³/XP + . . . - X-6X Зх/XP}] / h
=f'(x) = lim h→0 [XP {1 + PXP-1h/XP + P(P-1)/2! XP-2h²/XP + P(P-1)(P-2)/3! XP-3h³/XP + . . . - X-6/XP}] / h
Now, let's find out the value of each term in the brackets one by one as the value of h approaches 0:
When h = 0, we have:1 + PXP-1h/XP + P(P-1)/2! XP-2h²/XP + P(P-1)(P-2)/3! XP-3h³/XP + . . . - X-6/XP=1 + P + P(P-1)/2! (X-6) + P(P-1)(P-2)/3! (X-6)² + . . . - X-6/XP
We can simplify the above expression further using the formula:(1+x)n = 1 + nx + n(n-1)/2! x² + n(n-1)(n-2)/3! x³ + . . .
Therefore, we get:
1 + P + P(P-1)/2! (X-6) + P(P-1)(P-2)/3! (X-6)² + . . . - X-6/XP
= [(1+(X-6)P/X] - X-6/XP= [(X-5)P - X-6] / XP
Therefore, the derivative of f(x) by definition f(x) = XP-6X Зх is:f'(x) = lim h→0 [XP {1 + PXP-1h/XP + P(P-1)/2! XP-2h²/XP + P(P-1)(P-2)/3! XP-3h³/XP + . . . - X-6/XP}] / h=f'(x) = [(X-5)P - X-6] / XP, which is the final answer.
To know more about expression , visit;
https://brainly.com/question/1859113
#SPJ11
How do I solve ║8-3p║≥2
The solution to the inequality ||8-3p|| ≥ 2 is:p ≤ 2 or p ≥ 10/3. To solve the inequality ||8-3p|| ≥ 2, you'll first want to isolate the absolute value expression.
Once you've done that, you'll be left with two inequalities to solve. How to solve the inequality ||8-3p|| ≥ 2?The first inequality is 8-3p ≥ 2.
To solve for p, you can start by subtracting 8 from both sides to get:-3p ≥ -6.
Then divide both sides by -3 to get:p ≤ 2. The second inequality is -(8-3p) ≥ 2. To solve for p, you can start by distributing the negative sign to get:-8 + 3p ≥ 2.
Then add 8 to both sides to get:3p ≥ 10. Finally, divide both sides by 3 to get:p ≥ 10/3. So the solution to the inequality ||8-3p|| ≥ 2 is:p ≤ 2 or p ≥ 10/3.
For more question on inequality
https://brainly.com/question/30238989
#SPJ8
Your company has a profit that is represented by the equation P=−14x2+5x+24P=-14x2+5x+24, where P is the profit in millions and x is the number of years starting in 2018.
Graph the relation
Is this relation linear, quadratic or neither? Explain your answer in two different ways.
What is the direction of opening and does profit have a maximum or minimum? How do you know?
What is the PP-intercept of this relation? What does it represent? Do you think it would make sense that this is a new company given the PP-intercept? Explain.
Your company has a profit that is represented by the equation P=−14x2+5x+24P=-14x2+5x+24, where P is the profit in millions and x is the number of years starting in 2018.
Graph the relation
Is this relation linear, quadratic or neither? Explain your answer in two different ways.
What is the direction of opening and does profit have a maximum or minimum? How do you know?
What is the PP-intercept of this relation? What does it represent? Do you think it would make sense that this is a new company given the PP-intercept? Explain.
Your company has a profit that is represented by the equation P=−14x2+5x+24P=-14x2+5x+24, where P is the profit in millions and x is the number of years starting in 2018.
Graph the relation
Is this relation linear, quadratic or neither? Explain your answer in two different ways.
What is the direction of opening and does profit have a maximum or minimum? How do you know?
What is the PP-intercept of this relation? What does it represent? Do you think it would make sense that this is a new company given the PP-intercept? Explain.
The direction of the opening of the parabola can be determined by looking at the coefficient of the quadratic term (-14x^2). If the coefficient is negative, the parabola opens downwards and has a maximum point. If the coefficient is positive, the parabola opens upwards and has a minimum point.
In this case, the coefficient is negative, so the parabola opens downwards and has a maximum point. The given relation
P=−14x2+5x+24
P=-14x2+5x+24 is quadratic because it has a degree of 2. In this relation, x is raised to the power of 2.
The profit has a maximum value because the parabola opens downwards. The maximum point of the parabola is the vertex which represents the maximum profit.
The vertex of the parabola can be found using the formula:
\frac{-b}{2a} = \frac{-5}{2(-14)} = 0.1786
P(0.1786) = 24.3214
Therefore, the maximum profit is 24.3214 million dollars. P-intercept is the value of P when x is equal to 0. To find the P-intercept, substitute 0 for x in the equation
P=−14x2+5x+24
P=-14x2+5x+24
P = -14(0)^2 + 5(0) + 24
P = 24 The P-intercept is 24 million dollars.
The P-intercept represents the profit of the company at the beginning of the first year (2018) when x is equal to 0. At the start of the business, the profit is 24 million dollars.
To know more about Quadratic Term visit:
https://brainly.com/question/12252732
#SPJ11
Get an education: In 2012 the General Social Survey asked 848 adults how many years of education they had.The sample mean was 8.47 years with a standard deviation of 8.99 years.
(a) Construct an 80% confidence interval for the mean number of years of education. Round the answers to
at least two decimal places.
(b) Data collected in an earlier study suggest that the mean 2000 in was 6.93 years. A sociologist believes than the mean in 2012 is the same. Does the confidence interval contradict this claim? Explain.
(a) To construct an 80% confidence interval for the mean number of years of education, we can use the formula:
Confidence Interval = sample mean ± (critical value * standard error)
First, we need to calculate the standard error, which is given by the formula:
Standard Error = standard deviation / √(sample size)
Given:
Sample mean () = 8.47 years
Standard deviation (σ) = 8.99 years
Sample size (n) = 848
Standard Error = 8.99 / √848 ≈ 0.3084
Next, we need to find the critical value for an 80% confidence level. Since the sample size is large (n > 30), we can use the Z-distribution. The critical value for an 80% confidence level is approximately 1.282.
Now, we can calculate the confidence interval:
Confidence Interval = 8.47 ± (1.282 * 0.3084)
Confidence Interval ≈ (8.15, 8.79)
Therefore, the 80% confidence interval for the mean number of years of education is approximately 8.15 to 8.79 years.
(b) The confidence interval does not necessarily contradict the claim that the mean in 2012 is the same as in 2000. The confidence interval represents a range of plausible values for the true population mean based on the sample data. Since the confidence interval (8.15, 8.79) includes the value of 6.93 (the mean in 2000), it is possible that the true mean in 2012 is the same as in 2000. However, we can say with 80% confidence that the mean in 2012 falls within the given confidence interval.
Learn more about Mean here -: brainly.com/question/1136789
#SPJ11
Find a formula for the nth partial sum of each series and use it to find the series sum if the series converges
(i) 2+ 2/3+ 2/9 + 2/27 + ... + 2/3^n-1+ ...
(ii) 5/1.2 + 5/2.3 + 5/3.4 + ... + ... 5/n(n + 1) + ...
(i) The nth partial sum of the series 2 + 2/3 + 2/9 + 2/27 + ... is given by Sn = 2(1 - (1/3)^n) / (1 - 1/3) = 3(1 - (1/3)^n). The series converges to the limit 3.
(ii) The nth partial sum of the series 5/1.2 + 5/2.3 + 5/3.4 + ... is given by Sn = 5((1/n) - (1/(n+1))). The series converges to the limit 5.
(i) For the series 2 + 2/3 + 2/9 + 2/27 + ..., notice that each term can be expressed as 2/3^n. The nth partial sum, Sn, can be obtained by summing up the terms from the first term to the nth term. This can be calculated using the formula for the sum of a geometric series: Sn = a(1 - r^n) / (1 - r), where a is the first term and r is the common ratio. In this case, a = 2 and r = 1/3. Simplifying the formula gives Sn = 2(1 - (1/3)^n) / (1 - 1/3) = 3(1 - (1/3)^n). As n approaches infinity, (1/3)^n approaches 0, so the series converges to the limit 3.
(ii) For the series 5/1.2 + 5/2.3 + 5/3.4 + ..., each term can be expressed as 5/(n(n+1)). The nth partial sum, Sn, can be obtained by summing up the terms from the first term to the nth term. In this case, we don't have a geometric series, but we can still find a formula for Sn. By observing the pattern, we can rewrite each term as 5((1/n) - (1/(n+1))). Summing up these terms, we find that Sn = 5((1/1) - (1/2)) + ((1/2) - (1/3)) + ... + ((1/n) - (1/(n+1))). Notice that many terms cancel out, leaving only the first and last terms. Simplifying, we have Sn = 5((1/1) - (1/(n+1))) = 5(1 - 1/(n+1)). As n approaches infinity, 1/(n+1) approaches 0, so the series converges to the limit 5.
Learn more about geometric series here:
https://brainly.com/question/30264021
#SPJ11
Write a function of the form "/(x) = expression" where the expression describes the amount Joe spends x years after age 30.
The function of the form "/(x) = expression" where the expression describes the amount Joe spends x years after age 30 is:f(x) = x0 + $1000x
To write a function of the form "f(x) = expression" that describes the amount Joe spends x years after age 30, we need to use the given information:
Joe spends $1000 more per year than he did the previous year. That means the amount Joe spends in a given year can be expressed as:$1000 + (amount spent in the previous year)
Now, let's define some variables:
x = number of years after age 30 (so when x = 0, Joe is 30 years old)
x0 = amount spent by Joe at age 30
Now, we can write the function as:
f(x) = x0 + $1000 + $1000 + ... (repeating $1000 x times) = x0 + $1000x
We repeat $1000 x times because Joe spends an additional $1000 each year, and he has been spending money for x years after age 30.
Therefore, the function of the form "/(x) = expression" where the expression describes the amount Joe spends x years after age 30 is:f(x) = x0 + $1000x
Learn more about function at;
https://brainly.com/question/12431044
#SPJ11
Consider a time series {Y} with a deterministic linear trend, i.e. Yt = a0+a₁t+ €t Here {€t} is a zero-mean stationary process with an autocovariance function 7x(h). Consider the difference operator such that Yt = Yt - Yt-1. You will demonstrate in this exercise that it is possible to transform a non-stationary process into a stationary process. (a) Illustrate {Yt} is non-stationary. (b) Demonstrate {Wt} is stationary, if W₁ = Yt = Yt - Yt-1.
It is possible to transform a non-stationary process into a stationary process using a difference operator. Consider a time series {Y} with a deterministic linear trend, i.e. Yt = a0+a₁t+ €t, where {€t} is a zero-mean stationary process with an autocovariance function 7x(h).
Let us demonstrate that it is possible to transform a non-stationary process into a stationary process using a difference operator.
(a) Illustrate {Yt} is non-stationary.The time series {Yt} is non-stationary because it has a deterministic linear trend. The deterministic linear trend implies that there is a long-term increase or decrease in the time series. Therefore, the mean and variance of {Yt} change over time.
(b) Demonstrate {Wt} is stationary, if W₁ = Yt = Yt - Yt-1.To show that {Wt} is stationary, we need to demonstrate that the mean, variance, and autocovariance of {Wt} are constant over time.
Mean:μ_w=E(W_t)=E(Y_t-Y_{t-1})=E(Y_t)-E(Y_{t-1})=a_0+a_1t-a_0-a_1(t-1)=a_1Therefore, the mean of {Wt} is constant over time and is equal to a_1., Variance:σ_w^2=Var(W_t)=Var(Y_t-Y_{t-1})=Var(Y_t)+Var(Y_{t-1})-2Cov(Y_t,Y_{t-1})Since {€t} is a zero-mean stationary process, the variance of {Yt} is constant over time and is equal to σ_ε^2. Therefore,σ_w^2=2σ_ε^2(1-ρ_1)where ρ_1 is the autocorrelation coefficient between Yt and Yt-1. Since {€t} is stationary, the autocorrelation coefficient ρ_1 decreases as the lag h increases. Therefore,σ_w^2<∞because the autocorrelation coefficient ρ_1 converges to zero as the lag h increases.
Autocovariance:γ_w(h)=Cov(W_t,W_{t-h})=Cov(Y_t-Y_{t-1},Y_{t-h}-Y_{t-h-1})=Cov(Y_t,Y_{t-h})-Cov(Y_{t-1},Y_{t-h})-Cov(Y_t,Y_{t-h-1})+Cov(Y_{t-1},Y_{t-h-1})Since {€t} is a zero-mean stationary process, the autocovariance function 7x(h) only depends on the lag h and not on the time t. Therefore,γ_w(h)=γ_Y(h)-γ_Y(h-1)-γ_Y(h+1)+γ_Y(h)=2γ_Y(h)-γ_Y(h-1)-γ_Y(h+1)Since {€t} is stationary, the autocovariance function γ_Y(h) decreases as the lag h increases. Therefore,γ_w(h)=O(1)as h → ∞.
We have demonstrated that {Wt} is stationary if W₁ = Yt = Yt - Yt-1. The mean of {Wt} is constant over time and is equal to a₁. The variance of {Wt} is finite because the autocorrelation coefficient ρ_1 converges to zero as the lag h increases. The autocovariance function γ_w(h) decreases as the lag h increases and is bounded as h → ∞.
To know more about the difference operators, visit :
brainly.com/question/31846560
#SPJ11
Determine the global extreme values of the f(x, y) = 10x – 2y if y ≥ x − 5, y ≥ −x-5, y ≤ 10. (Use symbolic notation and fractions where needed.) f max f min =
The global maximum value of f(x, y) = 10x - 2y, subject to the constraints y ≥ x - 5, y ≥ -x - 5, and y ≤ 10, is 50 and occurs at the point (5, 0). The global minimum value is -70 and occurs at the point (-5, 10). These extreme values are obtained by evaluating the function at the vertices of the triangular region formed by the constraints.
1. The global extreme values of the function f(x, y) = 10x - 2y, subject to the given constraints, can be determined as follows:
First, we need to find the critical points of the function. These occur where the partial derivatives with respect to x and y are both zero. Taking the partial derivative of f with respect to x, we get ∂f/∂x = 10. Similarly, the partial derivative with respect to y is ∂f/∂y = -2. Since these derivatives are constant, there are no critical points.
2. Next, we examine the boundaries defined by the constraints. The given constraints are y ≥ x - 5, y ≥ -x - 5, and y ≤ 10. Geometrically, these represent a triangular region in the xy-plane. The vertices of this triangle are (5, 0), (-5, 0), and (-5, 10).
3. To determine the extreme values within this region, we evaluate the function at the vertices and compare the results.
At (5, 0), f(5, 0) = 10(5) - 2(0) = 50.
At (-5, 0), f(-5, 0) = 10(-5) - 2(0) = -50.
At (-5, 10), f(-5, 10) = 10(-5) - 2(10) = -70.
4. Hence, the maximum value of f within the given constraints is 50, which occurs at (5, 0). The minimum value is -70, which occurs at (-5, 10).
Learn more about partial derivative here: brainly.com/question/32387059
#SPJ11
Find f'(-3) if 3x (f(x))^5 + x² f(x) = 0 and f(-3) = 1.
f'(-3) = _____
To find f'(-3), we need to differentiate the given equation implicitly with respect to x and then substitute x = -3.
The given equation is:
3x(f(x))^5 + x^2 f(x) = 0
To differentiate implicitly, we apply the product rule and the chain rule. Let's differentiate each term:
d/dx (3x(f(x))^5) = 3(f(x))^5 + 15x(f(x))^4 f'(x)
d/dx (x^2 f(x)) = 2x f(x) + x^2 f'(x)
Now we can rewrite the equation with the derivatives:
3(f(x))^5 + 15x(f(x))^4 f'(x) + 2x f(x) + x^2 f'(x) = 0
Now we substitute x = -3 and f(-3) = 1:
3(f(-3))^5 + 15(-3)(f(-3))^4 f'(-3) + 2(-3) f(-3) + (-3)^2 f'(-3) = 0
3(1)^5 - 45(f(-3))^4 f'(-3) - 6 + 9 f'(-3) = 0
3 - 45(f(-3))^4 f'(-3) - 6 + 9 f'(-3) = 0
-45(f(-3))^4 f'(-3) + 9 f'(-3) - 3 = 0
-45(1)^4 f'(-3) + 9 f'(-3) - 3 = 0
-45 f'(-3) + 9 f'(-3) - 3 = 0
-36 f'(-3) = 3
f'(-3) = 3 / (-36)
f'(-3) = -1/12
Therefore, f'(-3) is equal to -1/12.
To know more about equation implicitly:- https://brainly.com/question/32261870
#SPJ11
(a) [8 MARKS] Define the function g on S: -|x − t| if x = [-10, t) g(x):= 1 - e(x-t) if x = [t, 10] Plot this function in a graph and explain formally whether g is continuous on S.
(b) [6 MARKS] Does g have a maximum and minimum on the set S? Prove or disprove.
(c) [10 MARKS] Find the global maxima and minima of g on the set S if they exist.
(d) [6 MARKS] Argue informally whether the sufficient conditions for maxima are sat- isfied.
(a) g is continuous at x = t.
(b) g does not have a maximum or minimum on the set S.
(c) Without knowing the specific value of t, it is not possible to calculate the critical points and determine the global maxima and minima.
(d) We cannot argue informally whether the sufficient conditions for maxima are satisfied without the precise information.
(a) The function g on the set S can be defined as follows:
For x in the interval [-10, t), g(x) equals -|x - t|.
For x in the interval [t, 10], g(x) equals 1 - e^(x - t).
To plot the function, we need a specific value for t. Without that information, we cannot provide a precise graph. However, we can discuss the continuity of g on the set S.
For g to be continuous at a point x = t, the left-hand limit (LHL) and right-hand limit (RHL) must exist, and the function value at x = t must be equal to the limits. In this case, we have two different definitions for g on either side of t.
The left-hand limit as x approaches t from the left is -|t - t| = 0.
The right-hand limit as x approaches t from the right is 1 - e^(t - t) = 1 - e^0 = 1 - 1 = 0.
Since the LHL and RHL both equal 0, and the function value at x = t is also 0, we can conclude that g is continuous at x = t.
(b) To determine if g has a maximum and minimum on the set S, we need to consider the behavior of the function in the intervals [-10, t) and [t, 10].
In the interval [-10, t), the function g(x) equals -|x - t|. As x approaches -10, the absolute value term becomes significant, and the function approaches negative infinity. However, there is no defined maximum in this interval.
In the interval [t, 10], the function g(x) equals 1 - e^(x - t). The exponential term is always non-negative, so the function is bounded above by 1. However, there is no defined minimum in this interval either.
Therefore, g does not have a maximum or minimum on the set S.
(c) Finding the global maxima and minima of g on the set S requires determining the critical points and checking the function values at those points, as well as at the endpoints of the interval [-10, 10].
To find the critical points, we need to find the values of x where the derivative of g with respect to x equals zero. However, since g is defined piecewise, its derivative may not exist at some points. Without knowing the specific value of t, it is not possible to calculate the critical points and determine the global maxima and minima.
(d) The sufficient conditions for maxima include the existence of critical points and checking the concavity of the function at those points. However, without the specific value of t, we cannot calculate the critical points or determine the concavity of g. Therefore, we cannot argue informally whether the sufficient conditions for maxima are satisfied without the precise information.
Learn more about global maxima here:
https://brainly.com/question/29300702
#SPJ11
A lecturer is interested in determining the time taken by his students to complete a quiz. A random sample of 50 students is selected, and their completion times (in minutes) were summarized in the table below:-
Completion Time (minutes) Frequency
0 and less than 10 4
10 and less than 20 8
20 and less than 30 13
30 and less than 40 12
40 and less than 50 7
50 and less than 60 6
50
Calculate median (using a formula) and mode (using a graph) (10 marks)
The median completion time for the quiz is between 20 and 30 minutes, indicating that half of the students took less than 20 minutes, while the other half took more than 30 minutes.
To calculate the c of the completion times, we first need to arrange the data in ascending order. Then we find the middle value or the average of the two middle values if the sample size is even.
Arranging the data in ascending order:
0 and less than 10: 4
10 and less than 20: 8
20 and less than 30: 13
30 and less than 40: 12
40 and less than 50: 7
50 and less than 60: 6
We have a sample size of 50, which is an even number. So, to find the median, we take the average of the 25th and 26th values, which correspond to the 13th and 14th values in the ordered data. The 13th value is in the 20 and less than 30 range, and the 14th value is also in the same range. So, the median falls within the range of 20 and less than 30. Therefore, the median completion time is between 20 and 30 minutes.
To calculate the mode, we look for the category with the highest frequency. In this case, the category with the highest frequency is the 20 and less than 30 range, which has a frequency of 13. Hence, the mode of the completion times is 20 and less than 30 minutes.
Learn more about ”median” here:
brainly.com/question/11237736
#SPJ11