The rectangular coordinates of a point are given. Find polar coordin radians. (6, -6√3)

c) the marginal cost at the production level of 1200 is 2600.

To answer the questions, let's break down each part:

a) The cost at the production level 1200:

To find the cost at the production level of 1200, we can substitute x = 1200 into the cost function C(z).

C(z) = 72900 + 200x + x²

Substituting x = 1200:

C(1200) = 72900 + 200(1200) + (1200)²

        = 72900 + 240000 + 1440000

        = 2172900

the cost at the production level of 1200 is 2,172,900.

b) The average cost at the production level 1200:

To find the average cost, we need to divide the total cost at a specific production level by the quantity produced. In this case, it is 1200.

Average cost = Total cost / Quantity

Average cost at x = 1200:

Average cost = C(1200) / 1200

           = 2172900 / 1200

           ≈ 1810.75

the average cost at the production level of 1200 is approximately 1810.75.

c) The marginal cost at the production level 1200:

The marginal cost represents the rate of change of the cost function with respect to the production level. In other words, it is the derivative of the cost function.

To find the marginal cost, we differentiate the cost function C(z) with respect to x:

C'(z) = 200 + 2x

Substituting x = 1200:

C'(1200) = 200 + 2(1200)

         = 200 + 2400

         = 2600

To know more about derivative visit:

brainly.com/question/25324584

#SPJ11

The peak rate of runoff for the given storm can be estimated using the Rational Method. The Rational Method is commonly used to estimate peak runoff rates from a catchment area. The formula for the Rational Method is Q = CiA, where Q is the peak runoff rate, C is the coefficient of runoff, i is the rainfall intensity, and A is the catchment area.

In this case, the catchment area is given as 5.8 hectares, which is equivalent to 58000 square meters. The rainfall intensity is given as 49 mm/hr, which is equivalent to 0.049 m/min. The duration of the storm is given as 22 minutes. The coefficient of runoff is given as 0.61.

To calculate the peak rate of runoff, we can substitute the given values into the Rational Method formula:

Q = 0.61 * 0.049 * 58000
Q ≈ 1698.38 m³/min

To convert the peak rate of runoff to m³/s, we can divide by 60 (since there are 60 seconds in a minute):

Q ≈ 1698.38 / 60
Q ≈ 28.31 m³/s

Therefore, the estimated peak rate of runoff for the given storm is approximately 28.31 m³/s.

Know more about Rational Method here:

https://brainly.com/question/10161292

#SPJ11

Answer:

6/11

Step-by-step explanation:

6/11 = 0.54

x = 0.54

> 100x = 54.54[repetition bar]

> 100x - x = 54.54 - 0.54

> 99x = 54

> x = 54/99 = 6/11

Answer:

6/11

Step-by-step explanation:

(Spaces between steps for better understanding)

To convert the recurring decimal 0.54 with bar to a simplified fraction, we can use the following steps:

Step 1: Let's represent the recurring decimal 0.54 with bar as x.

x = 0.54 (with bar and it can't be represented as it violates terms)

Step 2: Multiply both sides of the equation by 100 to move the decimal point to the right:

100x = 54.54 (with bar)

Step 3: Subtract the equation obtained in Step 1 from the equation obtained in Step 2 to eliminate the recurring part:

100x - x = 54.54 (with bar) - 0.54 (with bar)

99x = 54

Step 4: Divide both sides of the equation by 99 to solve for x:

x = 54/99

Step 5: Simplify the fraction by dividing both the numerator and denominator by their greatest common divisor (GCD), which is 9 in this case:

x = (54/9) / (99/9)

x = 6/11

Therefore, the recurring decimal 0.54 with bar can be simplified to the fraction 6/11.

Random assignment does not always balance the proportion of each group (laptop vs. notebook) that sit in the front or back. However, by conducting a large number of randomizations, we can expect balanced groups on average.

Random assignment is a commonly used technique in experimental design to assign participants to different groups. While random assignment helps to minimize bias and ensure groups are comparable, it does not guarantee perfect balance in all cases.

In the given scenario, if random assignment does not produce perfectly balanced groups in terms of the proportion of laptops and notebooks in the front or back, it does not imply that we were simply unlucky. The random assignment process inherently introduces variability, and the resulting group composition may differ across randomizations.

However, by increasing the number of randomizations, we can expect the average balance to improve. This is because random assignment aims to distribute potential confounding factors equally among groups, and with a larger sample size or more randomizations, the likelihood of achieving balanced groups increases.

It is important to note that the degree of balance achieved may also depend on the size of the treatment groups. Larger treatment groups may introduce more variability, making it harder to achieve perfect balance even with random assignment.

Learn more about factors here:

https://brainly.com/question/14549998

#SPJ11

The statement that is NOT correct about the hypothesis test of comparing two correlation coefficients is option (b): Table D (transformation of r to z) shows that when r is smaller, the corresponding z is very close to r.

The hypothesis test for comparing two correlation coefficients involves comparing the z-scores of the correlation coefficients. The z-score transformation is used to standardize the correlation coefficients and convert them into a common scale, which allows for easier comparison.

Now let's address each option to understand why the other statements are correct:

a. As the sample size increases, the critical value for the z-test will become smaller in absolute value: This statement is correct. When the sample size increases, the standard error of the correlation coefficient decreases, resulting in a smaller critical value for the z-test. This means that a smaller difference between the correlation coefficients is required to reject the null hypothesis.

c. Because the r distribution is severely skewed, we can't directly use it for the hypothesis test: This statement is also correct. The distribution of correlation coefficients (r) is not normally distributed and tends to be skewed. Therefore, we use the z-score transformation to approximate the distribution of the correlation coefficients to a standard normal distribution, which is symmetrical and suitable for hypothesis testing.

d. For the computation, the two correlation coefficients should be converted into z-scores first: This statement is correct. To compare two correlation coefficients, they need to be transformed into z-scores using the Fisher transformation. This transformation stabilizes the variances and allows for valid hypothesis testing.

In summary, option (b) is the statement that is NOT correct about the hypothesis test of comparing two correlation coefficients.

To know more about hypothesis testing, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/17099835#

#SPJ11

This integral will give you the volume of the region defined by the surfaces Z = Xy, Z = 0, 0 ≤ X ≤ 3, and 0 ≤ Y ≤ 4.

To find the volume of the region bounded by the surfaces Z = Xy, Z = 0, 0 ≤ X ≤ 3, and 0 ≤ Y ≤ 4, we can set up a double integral over the region in the XY-plane and integrate the height function Z = Xy.

The region is defined by the following bounds:

0 ≤ X ≤ 3 (horizontal bounds)

0 ≤ Y ≤ 4 (vertical bounds)

Let's denote the volume as V. The volume can be expressed as:

V = ∬(R) Xy dA,

where R represents the region in the XY-plane.

To set up the double integral, we need to define the limits of integration. Since the region is rectangular, the limits are straightforward:

0 ≤ X ≤ 3 (horizontal bounds)

0 ≤ Y ≤ 4 (vertical bounds)

The integral becomes:

V = ∫(0 to 4) ∫(0 to 3) Xy dX dY.

To visualize the region, we can sketch it in the XY-plane. Since the region is rectangular, it extends from X = 0 to X = 3 and from Y = 0 to Y = 4. The surface Z = Xy represents a curved surface that intersects the XY-plane at Y = 0 and X = 0, creating a triangle-shaped region.

Unfortunately, as a text-based platform, I'm unable to provide a visual sketch here. However, you can plot the region and the surface Z = Xy on a graphing software or calculator to get a better visual representation.

To find the volume numerically, you would need to evaluate the double integral:

V = ∫(0 to 4) ∫(0 to 3) Xy dX dY.

Evaluating this integral will give you the volume of the region defined by the surfaces Z = Xy, Z = 0, 0 ≤ X ≤ 3, and 0 ≤ Y ≤ 4.

Learn more about integral here

https://brainly.com/question/30094386

#SPJ11

The vector `V` can be expressed as a product of its length and direction as:V = |V| * D = √6 * [(1/√3) i + (1/√3) j + (1/√3) k]The correct answer is option C) `3 1 √√3 k`.

Given a vector `V

= √2 √2 √2`, express the vector as a product of its length and direction.The magnitude of the vector `V` can be found using the formula:|V|

= √(x² + y² + z²)where `x`, `y`, and `z` are the respective components of the vector `V`.Thus,|V|

= √(√2² + √2² + √2²)

= √(2 + 2 + 2)

= √6The direction of the vector is obtained by dividing each component of the vector by its magnitude. Thus, the direction vector can be obtained as follows:Let `D` be the direction vector of `V`.Then, the direction vector is given by:D = V / |V|

= (√2/√6) i + (√2/√6) j + (√2/√6) k

Simplifying this we get:D

= (1/√3) i + (1/√3) j + (1/√3) k.

The vector `V` can be expressed as a product of its length and direction as:V

= |V| * D

= √6 * [(1/√3) i + (1/√3) j + (1/√3) k]

The correct answer is option C) `3 1 √√3 k`.

To know more about direction visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30173481

#SPJ11

Given the flow rates and inlet temperatures of both fluids, along with the geometric properties of the tubes, we can calculate the oil outlet temperature by applying the principles of heat transfer.

The heat transfer in a shell-and-tube heat exchanger can be analyzed using the equation:

Q = U × A × ΔT

where Q is the heat transfer rate, U is the overall heat transfer coefficient, A is the heat transfer surface area, and ΔT is the temperature difference between the hot and cold fluids.

In this case, we are interested in finding the oil outlet temperature. We can assume that the heat transfer is primarily occurring on the tube side, as the shell-side convection coefficient is given as 500 W/m^2-K. By rearranging the equation, we have:

ΔT = Q / (U × A)

To calculate the heat transfer rate, we can use the equation:

Q = m × Cp × ΔT

where m is the mass flow rate and Cp is the specific heat capacity of the oil. With the given mass flow rate of the oil and its specific heat capacity, we can determine Q.

Once we have Q, we can calculate the temperature difference ΔT using the equation mentioned earlier. By subtracting ΔT from the oil inlet temperature, we can find the oil outlet temperature.

By applying these calculations and considering the specific properties of the fluids and the heat exchanger, we can determine the oil outlet temperature in the given shell-and-tube heat exchanger.

Learn more about mass:

https://brainly.com/question/33247061

#SPJ11

If the matrix A is an arbitrary 2 × 2 matrix over a field F, it can be row-reduced to the identity matrix if and only if ad bc ≠ 0. There are three remaining options for the number and positions of pivots in the RREF of A.

Those options are:If A can be row-reduced to the identity matrix, then we can express A in terms of elementary matrices:E1E2...EkA = Iwhere E1, E2, ..., Ek are elementary matrices. We know that elementary matrices are invertible, so the inverse of the product E1E2...Ek is also an elementary matrix, and we haveA = (E1E2...Ek)-1

This shows that A is invertible, since its inverse is a product of elementary matrices. Conversely, if A is invertible, then it can be row-reduced to the identity matrix using elementary row operations. Thus, A can be row-reduced to the identity matrix if and only if ad bc ≠ 0.If ad bc = 0, then we cannot row-reduce A to the identity matrix. However, we can still row-reduce A to a matrix in row echelon form.

There are three possible cases for the number and positions of pivots in the RREF of A, depending on whether a or c is zero.1. If a ≠ 0 and c ≠ 0, then the RREF of A isI* where * can be any nonzero element of F. In this case, A has rank 2.2. If a ≠ 0 and c = 0, then the RREF of A is [1 0 * 0]T, where * can be any element of F. In this case, A has rank 1.3. If a = 0 and c ≠ 0, then the RREF of A is [0 * 1 0]T, where * can be any element of F. In this case, A has rank 1.

To know about row echelon form visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30403280

#SPJ11

b) b) Subtract the first term from each side and rewrite the equation (starting the summation at n = 1):

[tex]cos(x) - 1 = - x^2/2! + x^4/4! - x^6/6! + ...[/tex]

To find the Taylor series for the function f(x) = sin(x) centered at a = π, we can use the formula for the Taylor series expansion:

[tex]f(x) = f(a) + f'(a)(x - a)/1! + f''(a)(x - a)^2/2! + f'''(a)(x - a)^3/3! + ...[/tex]

Let's begin by finding the derivatives of f(x) = sin(x):

f'(x) = cos(x)

f''(x) = -sin(x)

f'''(x) = -cos(x)

f''''(x) = sin(x)

...

At a = π, we have:

f(π) = sin(π)

= 0

f'(π) = cos(π)

= -1

f''(π) = -sin(π)

= 0

f'''(π) = -cos(π)

= 1

f''''(π) = sin(π)

= 0

...

Now, let's substitute these values into the Taylor series expansion formula:

[tex]f(x) = 0 + (-1)(x - \pi )/1! + 0(x - \pi )^2/2! + 1(x - \pi )^3/3! + 0(x - \pi )^4/4! + ...[/tex]

Simplifying this series:

[tex]f(x) = - (x - \pi ) + (x - \pi )^3/3! + ...[/tex]

The radius of convergence of a Taylor series centered at a is the distance from a to the nearest singularity (point where the function becomes infinite). In the case of the sine function, there are no singularities, so the radius of convergence is infinite.

Now, let's move on to the evaluation of the indefinite integral ∫(x*cos(x) - 1) dx.

a) Write the Maclaurin series for cos(x) and expand it out for at least four terms:

[tex]cos(x) = 1 - x^2/2! + x^4/4! - x^6/6! + ...[/tex]

[tex]cos(x) - 1 = - x^2/2! + x^4/4! - x^6/6! + ...[/tex]

c) Divide both sides by x and move x inside the series:

[tex](x*cos(x) - 1)/x = - x/2! + x^3/4! - x^5/6! + ...[/tex]

Simplifying further:

[tex]cos(x)/x - 1/x = - x/2! + x^3/4! - x^5/6! + ...[/tex]

d) Integrate both sides to evaluate the indefinite integral as an infinite series:

∫ (x*cos(x) - 1) dx = ∫ ((cos(x)/x) - (1/x)) dx

                      = [tex]- (x^2)/(2*2!) + (x^4)/(4*4!) - (x^6)/(6*6!) + ...[/tex]

This gives the indefinite integral as an infinite series.

To know more about derivatives visit:

brainly.com/question/25324584

#SPJ11

Answer:

87

Step-by-step explanation:

24*3=72

72+15=

87

Six rational numbers between 5/8 and 3/5 are 49/80, 73/160, 121/320, 97/320, 219/640, 335/960.

In mathematics, rational numbers are numbers that can be expressed as the quotient or fraction of two integers, where the denominator is not zero. A rational number can be represented as p/q, where p and q are integers and q is not equal to zero.

Key properties of rational numbers include:

Fractional Form: Rational numbers can be written in fractional form, where the numerator and denominator are integers. For example, 2/3, -5/7, and 1/2 are rational numbers.

Terminating or Repeating Decimals: Rational numbers have decimal representations that either terminate (end) or repeat in a pattern. For example, 0.75 (which is equivalent to 3/4) terminates, while 0.333... (which is equivalent to 1/3) repeats infinitely.

Closure under Operations: Rational numbers are closed under addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division. When rational numbers are added, subtracted, multiplied, or divided, the result is always another rational number.

Rational versus Irrational Numbers: Rational numbers can be contrasted with irrational numbers, which cannot be expressed as fractions and have non-repeating, non-terminating decimal representations. Examples of irrational numbers include √2 (square root of 2) and π (pi).

The given question is asking for six rational numbers between 5/8 and 3/5. To find these numbers, we can start by converting the fractions to have a common denominator.

The common denominator for 8 and 5 is 40. So, we can rewrite the fractions as follows:
5/8 = 25/40
3/5 = 24/40

Now that both fractions have the same denominator, we can find six rational numbers between them by evenly spacing them out. Let's use the method of taking the average of the two fractions:

First rational number: (25/40 + 24/40) / 2 = 49/80
Second rational number: (24/40 + 49/80) / 2 = 73/160
Third rational number: (49/80 + 73/160) / 2 = 121/320
Fourth rational number: (73/160 + 121/320) / 2 = 97/320
Fifth rational number: (121/320 + 97/320) / 2 = 219/640
Sixth rational number: (97/320 + 219/640) / 2 = 335/960

So, six rational numbers between 5/8 and 3/5 are:
49/80, 73/160, 121/320, 97/320, 219/640, 335/960.

These numbers are rational because they can be expressed as a ratio of two integers.

To know more about rational numbers visit:

https://brainly.com/question/24398433

#SPJ11

The nonlinear function for this problem is given as follows:

C. [tex]y = 2 + 6x^4[/tex]

The slope-intercept equation for a linear function is presented as follows:

y = mx + b.

In which:

The exponent of the variable x on a a linear function is given as follows:

1.

For option C, the function has an exponent of 4, hence it is the non-linear function.

More can be learned about linear functions at https://brainly.com/question/15602982

#SPJ1

we can conclude that there is not enough evidence to suggest that the proportion of baby girls is different from 0.5 when parents use the XSORT method of gender selection.

a. The original claim is to test whether the proportion of baby girls is different from 0.5 when parents use the XSORT method of gender selection.

b. The null and alternative hypotheses are as follows:

Null hypothesis H0: p = 0.5Alternative hypothesis H1: p ≠ 0.5where p is the proportion of baby girls when parents use the XSORT method of gender selection.

c. The test statistic is given by:z = (p - P) / sqrt(PQ/n)where P is the hypothesized proportion, Q = 1 - P, and n is the sample size. In this case, P = 0.5, Q = 0.5, p = 0.55, and n = 100. Therefore,z = (0.55 - 0.5) / sqrt(0.5 × 0.5/100) = 1.00d.

The p-value is the probability of getting a test statistic as extreme or more extreme than the observed sample result, assuming the null hypothesis is true.

Since this is a two-tailed test, we need to find the area in both tails beyond |z| = 1.00. Using a standard normal distribution table or calculator, we get:p-value = 2 × P(z > 1.00) = 2 × 0.1587 = 0.3174e. Since the p-value of 0.3174 is greater than the significance level of 0.05, we fail to reject the null hypothesis.

e. Therefore, we can conclude that there is not enough evidence to suggest that the proportion of baby girls is different from 0.5 when parents use the XSORT method of gender selection.

learn more about XSORT method here:

https://brainly.com/question/16318937

#SPJ11

In summary:

- The function is concave upward for x < 0 and x > 5.

- The function is concave downward for 0 < x < 5.

To determine where the function f(x) = 3x^4 - 30x^3 + x - 9 is concave upward and concave downward, we need to find the second derivative of the function and analyze its sign.

First, let's find the first derivative of f(x):

f'(x) = 12x^3 - 90x^2 + 1

Next, let's find the second derivative by differentiating f'(x):

f''(x) = 36x^2 - 180x

To determine where the function is concave upward, we need to find the values of x for which f''(x) > 0.

Setting f''(x) > 0, we have:

36x^2 - 180x > 0

Factoring out 36x from both terms, we get:

36x(x - 5) > 0

To find the critical points, we set each factor equal to zero:

36x = 0   --> x = 0

x - 5 = 0 --> x = 5

Now we can analyze the intervals and determine the concavity:

For x < 0, we choose a test value such as x = -1:

36(-1)(-1 - 5) > 0, which is true. So, f''(x) > 0 for x < 0.

For 0 < x < 5, we choose a test value such as x = 1:

36(1)(1 - 5) < 0, which is false. So, f''(x) < 0 for 0 < x < 5.

For x > 5, we choose a test value such as x = 6:

36(6)(6 - 5) > 0, which is true. So, f''(x) > 0 for x > 5.

Therefore, the function f(x) = 3x^4 - 30x^3 + x - 9 is concave upward for x < 0 and x > 5.

To determine where the function is concave downward, we need to find the values of x for which f''(x) < 0.

Setting f''(x) < 0, we have:

36x^2 - 180x < 0

Factoring out 36x from both terms, we get:

36x(x - 5) < 0

Using the same critical points, we can determine the intervals of concave downward:

For 0 < x < 5, we choose a test value such as x = 1:

36(1)(1 - 5) < 0, which is true. So, f''(x) < 0 for 0 < x < 5.

Therefore, the function f(x) = 3x^4 - 30x^3 + x - 9 is concave downward for 0 < x < 5.

To know more about derivative visit:

brainly.com/question/25324584

#SPJ11

The best estimate for the number of grains of sugar in a 5-pound bag is approximately 3.6 × 10^7 grains (option C).

To find the best estimate for the number of grains of sugar in a 5-pound bag, we need to determine the number of grains in 1 pound and then multiply it by 5.

The weight of 1 pound of sugar is given as 4.5 × 10^2 grams. To find the number of grains in 1 pound, we divide the weight of 1 pound by the weight of each grain, which is 6.25 × 10^(-4) grams.

Number of grains in 1 pound = (4.5 × 10^2 grams) / (6.25 × 10^(-4) grams)

Simplifying the expression, we get:

Number of grains in 1 pound = (4.5 × 10^2) / (6.25 × 10^(-4)) = (4.5 × 10^2) × (10^4 / 6.25)

Number of grains in 1 pound ≈ 7.2 × 10^6 grains

Finally, we multiply the number of grains in 1 pound by 5 to find the best estimate for the number of grains in a 5-pound bag:

Best estimate for the number of grains in a 5-pound bag ≈ (7.2 × 10^6 grains) × 5 = 3.6 × 10^7 grains

Know more about expressionhere;

https://brainly.com/question/28170201

#SPJ11

Therefore, the probabilities are:

a) P(A∩B) = 0.198.

b) P(A∪B) = 0.867.

c) P(A∣B) = 0.6.

d) P(A^C∪B) = 0.55.

a) To find P(A∩B), the probability of both events A and B occurring, we multiply the probabilities of the two events since they are independent:

P(A∩B) = P(A) * P(B) = 0.6 * 0.33 = 0.198.

b) To find P(A∪B), the probability of either event A or event B (or both) occurring, we can use the formula:

P(A∪B) = P(A) + P(B) - P(A∩B).

Given that A and B are independent, P(A∩B) = P(A) * P(B), so we have:

P(A∪B) = P(A) + P(B) - P(A) * P(B) = 0.6 + 0.33 - (0.6 * 0.33) = 0.867.

c) To find P(A∣B), the conditional probability of event A given that event B has occurred, we use the formula:

P(A∣B) = P(A∩B) / P(B).

Since A and B are independent, P(A∩B) = P(A) * P(B), so we have:

P(A∣B) = (P(A) * P(B)) / P(B) = P(A) = 0.6.

d) To find P(A^C∪B), the probability of either the complement of event A or event B (or both) occurring, we can use the formula:

P(A^C∪B) = P(A^C) + P(B) - P((A^C)∩B).

Since A and B are independent, P((A^C)∩B) = P(A^C) * P(B), so we have:

P(A^C∪B) = P(A^C) + P(B) - P(A^C) * P(B).

The complement of event A is A^C, and its probability is 1 - P(A):

P(A^C∪B) = (1 - P(A)) + P(B) - (1 - P(A)) * P(B).

Plugging in the given probabilities:

P(A^C∪B) = (1 - 0.6) + 0.33 - (1 - 0.6) * 0.33 = 0.55.

Therefore, the probabilities are:

a) P(A∩B) = 0.198.

b) P(A∪B) = 0.867.

c) P(A∣B) = 0.6.

d) P(A^C∪B) = 0.55.

Learn more about complement here:

https://brainly.com/question/29697356

#SPJ11

The mass and center of mass of the solid E are M = 43.333 and CM = (1.8056, 1.4722, 1.7222), respectively.

The mass of the solid E can be found by using the formula for the triple integral with respect to the volume of a solid. We can also use the formula for the triple integral to calculate the center of mass of the solid.

The mass of the solid E is given by:

M = ∫ ∫ ∫ 3y dx dy dz

We can evaluate the integral with respect to x, y, and z for the given domain of the tetrahedron bounded by the planes x=0, y=0, z=0, and x+y+z=4. The limits of integration for the x variable are 0 to 4-y-z. The limits of integration for the y variable are 0 to 4-x-z. The limits of integration for the z variable are 0 to 4-x-y.

M = ∫ (4-y-z) ∫ (4-x-z) ∫ (4-x-y) 3y dx dy dz

We can evaluate the integrals as such:

M = ∫ (4-y-z) ∫ (4-x-z) (4y-2xy-2xz) dy dz

 = ∫ (4-y-z) (16-4x²-8xz) dz

 = (64 - 8y² - 16yz) z

We can evaluate the integral with respect to z between the limits 0 to 4-y.

M = 43.333

We can use the same method to calculate the center of mass of the solid E. The center of mass of the solid E is given by the formula:

CM = (1/M) ∫ ∫ ∫ x ρ(x, y, z) dx dy dz

We can evaluate the triple integral with the same limits of integration as we did for the mass.

CM = (1/M) ∫ (4-y-z) ∫ (4-x-z) ∫ (4-x-y) × 3y dx dy dz

We can evaluate the integrals as such:

CM = (1/M) ∫ (4-y-z) ∫ (4-x-z) (x²y-xy²-x²z) dy dz

 = (1/M) ∫ (4-y-z) (2x^3y - x²y²- 2x^3z) dz

 = (1/M) (6x^4y - 3x³y² - 6x⁴z) z

We can evaluate the integral with respect to z between 0 to 4-y.

CM = 43.333/M (1.8056, 1.4722, 1.7222)

Therefore, the mass and center of mass of the solid E are M = 43.333 and CM = (1.8056, 1.4722, 1.7222), respectively.

Learn more about the integration here:

https://brainly.com/question/31744185.

#SPJ4

Answer:

I attached an image below with the answers.

Step-by-step explanation:

To find the correct answers to these questions, you can simply take the shown x and y values and plug them into the possible systems of equations listed in the blue. Sub the x into the x and the y into the y. Numbers like 2x and 3y are multiplication.

If the numbers you inputted equal the same on both sides of the equal sign for both equations per box, then the solutions, (x and y) are true for that system.

I hope the image makes sense and you don't have to download it.

The function fog(x) is written as x³+ 3x²

First, we need to know that functions are defined as expressions, rules or laws showing the relationship between two variables.

These variables are listed as;

From the information given, we have that;

f(x)=x²

g(x)=x+3

To determine the composite function fog(x), we need to multiply the functions in terms of x, we get;

fog(x) = x²( x + 3)

expand the bracket, we have;

fog(x) =  x³+ 3x²

Note that we can no longer add the terms, because they have different powers.

Learn more about functions at:  https://brainly.com/question/11624077

#SPJ1

The complete question :

Let f(x)=x^2and g(x)=x+3. Find fog(x)

The equations are written as;

Slope - intercept form : y = mx + c

Point- slope form; y − y₁= m(x − x₁).

Standard form; y - mx + c = 0

First, we need to know that the general formula representing the equation of a line of graph is expressed as;

y = mx + c

Such that the parameters of the formula are;

From the information given, we have that the graph is a straight line.

Then, we have;

y = mx + c

Learn more about equation of a line at: https://brainly.com/question/18831322

#SPJ1

Answer:

-3

Step-by-step explanation:

Parallel lines have equal slopes.

Answer: -3

For ( a)  the critical points of [tex]\( g \) are \( x = 0 \) and \( x = \frac{1}{5} \).[/tex] For ( b ) Since [tex]\( g'(1) \)[/tex] is

positive, the sign of [tex]\( g'(x) \)[/tex] is positive on the interval [tex]\((\frac{1}{5}, \infty)\).[/tex] For ( c ) the

critical point [tex]\( x = \frac{1}{5} \)[/tex]  and  [tex]\( x = 0 \)[/tex] is also a local minimum.

(a) To find the critical points of [tex]\( g \)[/tex] , we need to solve the equation [tex]\( g'(x) = 0 \)[/tex]. In this case, the derivative of [tex]\( g \)[/tex] is given by:

[tex]\[ g'(x) = \frac{{30x^2(5x-1)}}{{5-x}} \][/tex]

To find the critical points, we set the numerator equal to zero and solve for [tex]\( x \):[/tex]

[tex]\[ 30x^2(5x-1) = 0 \][/tex]

We can see that this equation will be satisfied if either [tex]\( 30x^2 = 0 \) or \( 5x-1 = 0 \).[/tex] Solving these equations individually, we get:

For [tex]\( 30x^2 = 0 \):[/tex]

[tex]\[ x = 0 \][/tex]

For [tex]\( 5x-1 = 0 \):[/tex]

[tex]\[ x = \frac{1}{5} \][/tex]

Therefore, the critical points of [tex]\( g \) are \( x = 0 \) and \( x = \frac{1}{5} \).[/tex]

(b) To determine the sign of [tex]\( g'(x) \)[/tex] on each subinterval of the real number line, we need to test the intervals created by the critical points and the endpoints. Let's consider the intervals: [tex]\((- \infty, 0)\), \((0, \frac{1}{5})\), \((\frac{1}{5}, \infty)\).[/tex]

For the interval [tex]\((- \infty, 0)\):[/tex]

Choosing a test point [tex]\( x = -1 \)[/tex] in this interval, we can evaluate [tex]\( g'(-1) \)[/tex] to determine the sign. Substituting [tex]\( x = -1 \)[/tex] into the derivative, we get:

[tex]\[ g'(-1) = \frac{{30(-1)^2(5(-1)-1)}}{{5-(-1)}} = \frac{{-120}}{{6}} = -20 \][/tex]

Since [tex]\( g'(-1) \)[/tex]  is negative, the sign of [tex]\( g'(x) \)[/tex] is negative on the interval [tex]\((- \infty, 0)\).[/tex]

For the interval [tex]\((0, \frac{1}{5})\):[/tex]

Choosing a test point [tex]\( x = \frac{1}{10} \)[/tex] in this interval, we can evaluate [tex]\( g'(\frac{1}{10}) \)[/tex]  to determine the sign. Substituting [tex]\( x = \frac{1}{10} \)[/tex] into the derivative, we get:

[tex]\[ g'(\frac{1}{10}) = \frac{{30(\frac{1}{10})^2(5(\frac{1}{10})-1)}}{{5-(\frac{1}{10})}} = \frac{{-1}}{{5}} \][/tex]

Since [tex]\( g'(\frac{1}{10}) \)[/tex] is negative, the sign of [tex]\( g'(x) \)[/tex] is negative on the interval [tex]\((0, \frac{1}{5})\).[/tex]

For the interval [tex]\((\frac{1}{5}, \infty)\):[/tex]

Choosing a test point [tex]\( x = 1 \)[/tex] in this interval, we can evaluate [tex]\( g'(1) \)[/tex]  to determine the sign. Substituting [tex]\( x = 1 \)[/tex] into the derivative, we get:

[tex]\[ g'(1) = \frac{{30(1)^2(5(1)-1)}}{{5-(1)}} = 120 \][/tex]

Since [tex]\( g'(1) \)[/tex] is positive, the sign of [tex]\( g'(x) \)[/tex] is positive on the interval [tex]\((\frac{1}{5}, \infty)\).[/tex]

Therefore, the sign of [tex]\( g'(x) \)[/tex] on each subinterval is as follows:

[tex]\[(- \infty, 0) & : \text{Negative} \\(0, \frac{1}{5}) & : \text{Negative} \\(\frac{1}{5}, \infty) & : \text{Positive} \\\][/tex]

(c) To classify each critical point as a local maximum, local minimum, or neither, we can use the signs of the derivative on each side of the critical point.

For the critical point [tex]\( x = 0 \):[/tex]

The sign of [tex]\( g'(x) \)[/tex] changes from negative to positive as we move from left to right of [tex]\( x = 0 \).[/tex] Therefore, the critical point [tex]\( x = 0 \)[/tex] is a local minimum.

For the critical point [tex]\( x = \frac{1}{5} \):[/tex]

The sign of [tex]\( g'(x) \)[/tex] changes from negative to positive as we move from left to right of [tex]\( x = \frac{1}{5} \)[/tex]. Therefore, the critical point [tex]\( x = \frac{1}{5} \)[/tex]  is also a local minimum.

In summary, the classification of each critical point is as follows:

[tex]\[\text{cp1} (x = 0) & : \text{Local Minimum} \\\text{cp2} (x = \frac{1}{5}) & : \text{Local Minimum} \\\][/tex]

Please note that we don't have any additional critical points beyond [tex]\( x = 0 \)[/tex] and [tex]\( x = \frac{1}{5} \)[/tex] in this case.

To know more about derivative visit-

brainly.com/question/29212834

#SPJ11

Given that we have an exponential function with a decay rate of 5% per hour, to find out when this exponential function reaches half of its original amount, we can use guess and check method.

The general formula of an exponential function with decay is given by:

y = abˣ

where a is the initial value of the function

b is the base of the exponential function

x is the time decay rate.

In this case, our exponential function is decaying at a rate of 5% per hour, which means that the base is equal to 1 - 0.05 = 0.95. The formula now becomes:

y = a(0.95)ˣ

To find out when the function reaches half of its original amount, we can substitute y with a/2 and solve for x.

a/2 = a(0.95)ˣ

x = log(0.5)/log(0.95)≈ 13.5 hours

Since the question asks us to round up to the nearest hour, we can round up 13.5 to 14 hours. Therefore, the exponential function reaches half of its original amount after 14 hours.

To know more about exponential, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29160729

#SPJ11

The hemispherical tank is positioned so it's base is circular and raised on 20 m stilts. So, to fill the tank with water through a hole in the base, the work required is 210.048 kNm.

Let's discuss the solution. Formula used: Work done = Force × DistanceWork done to fill the tank with water = Force × Distance The force required to lift the water to a height of 20 m is given by:

p = density × gWhere density of water, p = 9.8 kN per m³g = acceleration due to gravity = 9.8 m/s² = 0.0098 kN/s²Hence, p = 9.8 × 0.0098 = 0.09604 kN/m³Force required to lift water to 20 m = p × Volume of water to be lifted to a height of 20 mVolume of water to be lifted to a height of 20 m = Volume of water in the tank

Since the tank is a hemisphere, Volume of the tank = 2/3πr³Volume of water in the tank = 1/2 × 2/3πr³ = 1/3πr³Volume of water to be lifted to a height of 20 m = 1/3πr³Force required to lift water to 20 m = 0.09604 × 1/3πr³ The distance traveled by the water to reach a height of 20 m is the height of the stilts + the height of the tankDistance traveled by the water = 20 + 8 = 28 m

Therefore, work done to fill the tank with water through a hole in the base = Force required to lift water × Distance traveled by the water= 0.09604 × 1/3π(8)³ × 28= 210.048 kNm

Hence, the work required to fill the tank with water through a hole in the base is 210.048 kNm.

To know more about hemispherical visit:

brainly.com/question/32714554

#SPJ11

The lowest value is [tex]\( \frac{5\pi}{6} - \frac{\sqrt{3}}{2} \)[/tex] and the highest value is [tex]\( 3 + \sin(6) \)[/tex].

To determine the lowest and highest values of the function [tex]\( f(x) = x + \sin(2x) \)[/tex] in the interval [tex]\([0,3]\)[/tex], we need to find the points where the function reaches its minimum and maximum values.

First, we evaluate the function at the critical points, which occur when the derivative is equal to zero. Taking the derivative of \[tex]( f(x) \)[/tex]) with respect to [tex]\( x \)[/tex], we have:

[tex]\( f'(x) = 1 + 2\cos(2x) \)[/tex]

Setting [tex]\( f'(x) = 0 \)[/tex], we find:

[tex]\( 1 + 2\cos(2x) = 0 \)[/tex]

[tex]\( \cos(2x) = -\frac{1}{2} \)[/tex]

Solving for [tex]\( x \)[/tex], we get two solutions: [tex]\( x = \frac{\pi}{6} \)[/tex] and [tex]\( x = \frac{5\pi}{6} \)[/tex].

Next, we evaluate [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] at the critical points and the endpoints of the interval:

[tex]\( f(0) = 0 + \sin(0) = 0 \)[/tex]

[tex]\( f\left(\frac{\pi}{6}\right) = \frac{\pi}{6} + \sin\left(\frac{\pi}{3}\right) = \frac{\pi}{6} + \frac{\sqrt{3}}{2} \)[/tex]

[tex]\( f\left(\frac{5\pi}{6}\right) = \frac{5\pi}{6} + \sin\left(\frac{5\pi}{3}\right) = \frac{5\pi}{6} - \frac{\sqrt{3}}{2} \)[/tex]

[tex]\( f(3) = 3 + \sin(6) \)[/tex]

By comparing these values, we can determine the lowest and highest values of [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] in the interval [tex]\([0,3]\)[/tex].

Therefore, the lowest value is [tex]\( \frac{5\pi}{6} - \frac{\sqrt{3}}{2} \)[/tex] and the highest value is [tex]\( 3 + \sin(6) \)[/tex].

To more on Maxima:
https://brainly.com/question/29502088
#SPJ8

The approximate rise of the center of the rail above the ground would be 0.14 meters / 2 = 0.07 meters.

To calculate the approximate rise of the center of the rail above the ground, we need to consider the expansion of the rail length and the geometry of the rail itself.

Given that the rail expands by 14 centimeters in length, we can convert this measurement to meters by dividing by 100: 14 centimeters / 100 = 0.14 meters.

Since the rail expands uniformly, we can assume that the center of the rail rises halfway between the two ends. In other words, the rise of the center is half of the expansion length.

Therefore, the approximate rise of the center of the rail above the ground would be 0.14 meters / 2 = 0.07 meters.

It's important to note that this calculation assumes the rail expands uniformly along its entire length, without any other external factors influencing the expansion. Additionally, this approximation assumes a straight rail without any curves or bends. In reality, railway tracks often have curves and other structural considerations that can affect the expansion and rise.

This calculation provides a rough estimation based on the given information, but for precise calculations and engineering purposes, it is recommended to consult the specific expansion coefficient and structural data provided by the rail manufacturer or relevant engineering standards.

for more such question on rail  visit

https://brainly.com/question/31827085

#SPJ8

Population predicted in 2026:To find the predicted population in the year 2026, we can substitute t = 16 into the equation

P = 6.77e^(0.012t).

Thus,

P = 6.77e^(0.012*16) billion≈ 9.77 billion.

Therefore, the predicted population of the world in the year 2026 is approximately 9.77 billion people.(b) Predicted average population between 2010 and 2026 To find the predicted average population between 2010 and 2026, we need to find the total population over this time period and divide by the number of years.Using t = 16, we can find the population in the year 2026 as we did in part (a):

P = 6.77e^(0.012*16) billion≈ 9.77 billion.

To find the population in the year 2010, we can substitute

t = 0:P = 6.77e^(0.012*0)

billion= 6.77 billion

Therefore, the population in the year 2010 was approximately 6.77 billion people.The time period between 2010 and 2026 is 16 years.Thus, the total population over this time period is:Total population = 9.77 + 6.77 = 16.54 billionThe predicted average population between 2010 and 2026 is therefore:Average population = Total population/Number of years= 16.54/16≈ 1.03 billionTherefore, the average population of the world over this time period is approximately 1.03 billion people.

To know more about substitute visit :

https://brainly.com/question/29383142

#SPJ11

Given function:[tex]f(x, y) = (9x - 3y)⁹[/tex]We have to find ∂x and ∂y for the above-given function.To find ∂x:We have to differentiate the given function partially with respect to x by treating y as a constant.

[tex]∂f/∂x = (9x - 3y)⁹[/tex]Now, we will differentiate the above expression with respect to x. Therefore, the derivative of x will be 1, and the derivative of y will be zero[tex].(∂f/∂x) = 9(9x - 3y)⁸ × 9[/tex]Therefore[tex], ∂x = 81(9x - 3y)⁸[/tex]To find ∂y:We have to differentiate the given function partially with respect to y by treating x as a constant.

[tex]∂f/∂y = (9x - 3y)⁹[/tex]Now, we will differentiate the above expression with respect to y. Therefore, the derivative of y will be 1, and the derivative of x will be zero[tex].(∂f/∂y) = 9(-3)(9x - 3y)⁸ × (-1)[/tex]

[tex]∂y = 27(9y - 3x)⁸Hence, ∂x = 81(9x - 3y)⁸ and ∂y = 27(9y - 3x)⁸[/tex].These are the required results for the given function.

To know more about differentiate visit:

https://brainly.com/question/13958985

#SPJ11

when the slope of a line is 2/3

the slope of a line which is prependicular to it is -3/2