Use Aw analysis to find the best alternative for your company starting one of the following projects. Your company MARR is \( 9.1 \% \). Draw the cashflow diagram."

Food Goblin Supermarket should schedule 2 cashiers to meet the required 12 percent capacity cushion. Hence, the answer is 2 cashiers.

To determine the number of cashiers that Food Goblin Supermarket should schedule, we need to calculate the total time required to serve customers and then adjust for the desired capacity cushion.

In the first 4 hours of each workday, with 5 cashiers and 4 baggers serving approximately 15 customers per hour, the total number of customers served would be:

15 customers/hour * 4 hours = 60 customers

For each customer, a cashier and a bagger spend a total of 4 minutes at checkout and 2 minutes at bagging, resulting in a total service time of:

4 minutes + 2 minutes = 6 minutes per customer

To find the total time required to serve all customers, we multiply the number of customers by the service time:

60 customers * 6 minutes/customer = 360 minutes

To account for a 12 percent capacity cushion, we need to increase the scheduled time by that percentage. Therefore, the adjusted total time would be:

360 minutes + (12/100 * 360 minutes) = 360 minutes + 43.2 minutes = 403.2 minutes

Since each cashier works for 4 hours, which is equivalent to 240 minutes, the number of cashiers required can be calculated as:

403.2 minutes / 240 minutes per cashier = 1.68 cashiers

Rounding up to the nearest whole number, Food Goblin Supermarket should schedule 2 cashiers to accommodate the 12 percent capacity cushion. Hence, Food Goblin Supermarket should schedule 2 cashiers.

Learn more about cashiers here:

https://brainly.com/question/31070737

#SPJ11

The Wells Fargo scandal, involving fraudulent practices such as the creation of unauthorized accounts, was primarily attributed to a toxic sales culture within the company. While it is difficult to pinpoint blame on a single group, both middle managers and upper management played a role in fostering this culture.

Middle managers in Wells Fargo were under immense pressure to meet aggressive sales targets set by upper management. They were responsible for overseeing the performance of frontline employees and ensuring sales goals were met. Some middle managers may have resorted to unethical practices or turned a blind eye to questionable behavior to achieve these targets and avoid repercussions.

However, it is crucial to recognize that the creation and perpetuation of the sales culture stemmed from upper management. They established the aggressive sales goals, implemented incentive programs, and placed significant emphasis on cross-selling multiple products to customers. The high-pressure environment and lack of effective oversight from upper management created a climate where unethical practices were more likely to occur.

Ultimately, the Wells Fargo culture was a result of systemic issues within the organization, with both middle managers and upper management contributing to its development. While individual employees must be held accountable for their actions, addressing the root causes of the toxic culture requires changes at multiple levels of management, including establishing ethical frameworks, promoting transparency, and fostering a culture that prioritizes customer well-being over short-term sales goals.

To know more about Wells Fargo scandal click this link -

brainly.com/question/32671829

#SPJ11

a. The current income received is $2.44.
b. The capital gain is $5.85.
c. (1) The total return in dollars is $8.29. (2) The total return as a percentage of the initial investment is 20.22%.


To calculate the income, you need to subtract the dividend received from the initial investment. In this case, the dividend is $2.44, so the current income received is $2.44.

To calculate the capital gain, you need to subtract the initial investment from the current value of the stock. The stock was worth $46.85, and you bought it for $41.00, so the capital gain is $5.85.

To calculate the total return in dollars, you need to add the income and the capital gain. In this case, the total return in dollars is $2.44 + $5.85 = $8.29.

To calculate the total return as a percentage of the initial investment, you need to divide the total return in dollars by the initial investment and multiply by 100. In this case, the total return as a percentage of the initial investment is (8.29 / 41.00) * 100 = 20.22%.

In summary, the current income received is $2.44, the capital gain is $5.85, the total return in dollars is $8.29, and the total return as a percentage of the initial investment is 20.22%.

Learn more about the capital gain: https://brainly.com/question/32193753

#SPJ11

Option (d), The answer is: T-shirts' weighted average cost of capital (WACC) will be 7.74 percent.

To calculate the WACC, we need to consider the proportions of equity and debt in T-shirts' capital structure, as well as the respective costs of equity and debt.

Given that T-shirts' capital structure consists of 25 percent equity and 75 percent debt, we can calculate the weights as follows:
- Equity weight = 0.25
- Debt weight = 0.75

Next, we need to calculate the after-tax cost of debt. Since the before-tax cost of debt is given as 8 percent, and the weighted average tax rate is 21 percent, we can calculate the after-tax cost of debt using the formula:
After-tax cost of debt = Before-tax cost of debt * (1 - Tax rate)
After-tax cost of debt = 8% * (1 - 0.21) = 6.32%

Now, we can calculate the WACC using the formula:
WACC = (Equity weight * Cost of equity) + (Debt weight * After-tax cost of debt)
WACC = (0.25 * 12%) + (0.75 * 6.32%)
WACC = 3% + 4.74%
WACC = 7.74%

Therefore, T-shirts' WACC is 7.74 percent.

Overall, the WACC is a weighted average of the costs of equity and debt, taking into account the proportions of each in the capital structure. In this case, the WACC considers the equity and debt weights, the cost of equity, the before-tax cost of debt, and the weighted average tax rate.

Learn more about weighted average cost of capital (WACC): https://brainly.com/question/30746642

#SPJ11

The statement "In 2013, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission recovered $97.9 million from organizations found to have discriminated on the basis of age" is true.

In 2013, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) successfully recovered $97.9 million from organizations that were found to have discriminated against individuals based on age.

The EEOC is responsible for enforcing federal laws, such as the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), which protects individuals who are 40 years of age or older from age-based discrimination in the workplace. When the EEOC receives complaints or initiates investigations regarding age discrimination, they can pursue legal action against employers who have violated the law.

The $97.9 million recovery indicates the total amount of monetary benefits obtained by the EEOC through settlements, judgments, and conciliation agreements in cases related to age discrimination during the specified year. This amount may include compensatory damages awarded to victims, back pay, and other forms of relief intended to rectify the harm caused by the discriminatory practices.

This figure showcases the EEOC's efforts in combating age discrimination and seeking justice for individuals who have been unlawfully treated based on their age in the workplace.

Learn more about EEOC

https://brainly.com/question/31924575

#SPJ11

The competitive market equilibrium occurs at the point where the quantity demanded equals the quantity supplied, resulting in an efficient allocation of resources. In this case, the demand equation is given by P = 400 - 0.1Q, while the supply equation is P = 100 + 0.3Q. To find the equilibrium, we set the quantity demanded equal to the quantity supplied:

400 - 0.1Q = 100 + 0.3Q

Combining like terms and rearranging the equation, we get:

0.4Q = 300

Dividing both sides by 0.4, we find:

Q = 750

Substituting this value back into either the demand or supply equation, we can determine the equilibrium price:

P = 400 - 0.1(750)

P = 400 - 75

P = 325

Therefore, the competitive market equilibrium occurs at a quantity of 750 bicycles and a price of $325 per bicycle.

In summary, the competitive market equilibrium is reached when the quantity demanded equals the quantity supplied. By setting the demand and supply equations equal to each other, we find that the equilibrium quantity is 750 bicycles, and the equilibrium price is $325 per bicycle. This point represents the balance between consumer demand and producer supply, resulting in an efficient allocation of resources in the market.

Learn more about competitive market equilibrium:

brainly.com/question/30415733

#SPJ11

An activity has an optimistic time estimate of 12 days, a most likely estimate of 16 days, and a pessimistic estimate of 22 days. The expected standard deviation of the activity is between 2 to 3 days. (Option B)

To calculate the expected standard deviation, we can use the formula: (Pessimistic - Optimistic) / 6.

The pessimistic estimate is 22 days, and the optimistic estimate is 12 days.

Therefore, the expected standard deviation would be (22 - 12) / 6 = 1.67 days.

Since the standard deviation is a measure of the variability or spread of the estimates, it indicates how much the actual duration of the activity may deviate from the most likely estimate. The expected standard deviation is approximately 1.67 days, which falls within the range of 2 to 3 days. This means that there is a moderate level of variability in the estimates, suggesting that the activity may take around 2 to 3 days more or less than the most likely estimate of 16 days.

Learn more about activity here:

https://brainly.com/question/21416215

#SPJ11

The percentage change in the bond price, when the yield to maturity increases from 6% to 6.2%, is approximately -0.012 or -1.2%. This means the bond price would decrease by 1.2%.

To calculate the percentage change in the bond price, we can use the modified duration formula and the percentage change in yield to maturity:

Percentage Change in Bond Price = (-1) * Modified Duration * Percentage Change in Yield

Given:

Macaulay duration = 6.4 years

Yield to maturity (YTM) = 6%

Yield change = 6.2% - 6% = 0.002

First, we need to convert the Macaulay duration to modified duration by dividing it by (1 + Yield to maturity):

Modified Duration = Macaulay Duration / (1 + Yield to Maturity)

                = 6.4 / (1 + 0.06)

                ≈ 6.0189

Next, we can calculate the percentage change in bond price:

Percentage Change in Bond Price = (-1) * Modified Duration * Percentage Change in Yield

                              = (-1) * 6.0189 * 0.002

                              = -0.012

Therefore, the percentage change in the bond price, when the yield to maturity increases from 6% to 6.2%, is approximately -0.012 or -1.2%. This means the bond price would decrease by 1.2%.

learn more about yield to maturity here:

https://brainly.com/question/33005547

#SPJ11

a. Here's the categorization of each cost based on their nature:

Salaries for broom inspectors - Direct labor (involved in the production process).

Copy machine maintenance at corporate headquarters - Nonmanufacturing (not directly related to the production process).

Hourly wages for assembly workers - Direct labor (involved in the production process).

Research and development for new broom types - Nonmanufacturing (not directly related to the production process).

Salary for factory manager - Manufacturing overhead (indirect cost related to the production process).

Depreciation on broom-assembly equipment - Manufacturing overhead (indirect cost related to the production process).

Salary for the CEO administrative assistant - Nonmanufacturing (not directly related to the production process).

Wood for handles - Direct materials (materials used in the production process).

Factory cleaning supplies - Manufacturing overhead (indirect cost related to the production process).

Lubricants for broom-assembly factory equipment - Manufacturing overhead (indirect cost related to the production process).

Salaries for customer service representatives - Nonmanufacturing (not directly related to the production process).

Salaries for factory maintenance crew - Manufacturing overhead (indirect cost related to the production process).

Sales team golf outings with customers - Nonmanufacturing (not directly related to the production process).

Salaries for the raw materials receiving department employees - Manufacturing overhead (indirect cost related to the production process).

Advertising expenses - Nonmanufacturing (not directly related to the production process).

Depreciation on the CFO company car - Nonmanufacturing (not directly related to the production process).

Straw for brooms - Direct materials (materials used in the production process).

Salaries for sales personnel - Nonmanufacturing (not directly related to the production process).

Shipping costs to customers - Nonmanufacturing (not directly related to the production process).

b. Product costs are directly attributable to the production process and are incurred to manufacture the product. In this case, direct materials (wood and straw) and direct labor (broom inspectors and assembly workers) are product costs. Manufacturing overhead costs (factory manager salary, equipment depreciation, factory maintenance crew, etc.) are also product costs but are indirect in nature.

Period costs, on the other hand, are non-product costs and are not directly associated with the production process. Examples in this case include nonmanufacturing costs such as copy machine maintenance, research and development, CEO administrative assistant salary, customer service representative salary, sales team outings, advertising expenses, CFO car depreciation, sales personnel salaries, and shipping costs to customers.

Understanding the nature of costs helps in determining their impact on the production process and in making informed decisions regarding cost control and pricing strategies.

To know more about pricing strategies  click this link-

https://brainly.com/question/28295582

#SPJ11

The spending variance is labeled as favorable when the actual spending is less than the budgeted or expected spending. In other words, it indicates that the costs incurred for a particular item or activity are lower than what was originally planned.

A favorable spending variance can occur due to various factors. It may result from cost-saving measures, efficient resource utilization, negotiated discounts or better pricing, improved productivity, or effective cost control measures.

For example, if a company budgets $10,000 for advertising expenses but ends up spending only $8,000, the spending variance is considered favorable because the actual spending is lower than the budgeted amount.

A favorable spending variance is generally seen as a positive outcome as it signifies cost savings and potentially higher profitability. It indicates that the organization has managed to achieve its desired outcomes while spending less than anticipated.

However, it's important to analyze the reasons behind the favorable variance to ensure that it is not achieved at the expense of quality, customer satisfaction, or long-term sustainability. Regular monitoring and analysis of spending variances help businesses identify areas of cost savings and make informed decisions for future budgeting and resource allocation.

For more such questions on spending variance

https://brainly.com/question/13132136

#SPJ4

The NPV of this investment is approximately $1,355,175. To calculate the Net Present Value (NPV) of the investment project, we need to calculate the cash flows associated with the project and discount them to the present value.

Let's calculate the NPV using the given information.

Initial outlay for equipment and machinery: -$3,000,000

Net working capital added: -$100,000 (immediately)

Sales: $1,500,000 per year for the next four years

Cost of goods sold and operating expenses (excluding depreciation): 30% of sales

Depreciation: Straight-line over four years

Equipment sale value at the end of year 4: $800,000

Tax rate: 40%

Cost of capital: 10%

Now, let's calculate the annual cash flows:

Year 0:

Initial outlay: -$3,000,000

Net working capital: -$100,000

Total cash flow in Year 0: -$3,100,000

Years 1-4:

Sales: $1,500,000

Cost of goods sold and operating expenses: 30% of sales = $450,000

Depreciation: ($3,000,000 - $800,000) / 4 = $550,000 per year

Taxable income: Sales - Cost of goods sold - Depreciation = $1,500,000 - $450,000 - $550,000 = $500,000

Taxes: Taxable income * Tax rate = $500,000 * 40% = $200,000

Net cash flow (after taxes) = Sales - Cost of goods sold - Taxes + Depreciation = $1,500,000 - $450,000 - $200,000 + $550,000 = $1,400,000

Year 4:

Equipment sale value: $800,000

Taxable gain on equipment sale: Equipment sale value - Book value = $800,000 - $0 = $800,000

Taxes on gain: Taxable gain * Tax rate = $800,000 * 40% = $320,000

Net cash flow (after taxes) = Equipment sale value - Taxes on gain = $800,000 - $320,000 = $480,000

Now, let's calculate the present value of each cash flow using the cost of capital (discount rate) of 10%:

Year 0: -$3,100,000 / (1 + 10%)^0 = -$3,100,000

Years 1-4: $1,400,000 / (1 + 10%)^1 + $1,400,000 / (1 + 10%)^2 + $1,400,000 / (1 + 10%)^3 + $1,400,000 / (1 + 10%)^4 = $4,130,188

Year 4: $480,000 / (1 + 10%)^4 = $325,987

Now, let's calculate the NPV by summing the present values of the cash flows:

NPV = Sum of present values of cash flows - Initial outlay

NPV = -$3,100,000 + $4,130,188 + $325,987

NPV ≈ $1,355,175

Therefore, the NPV of this investment is approximately $1,355,175.

Learn more about Net Present Value (NPV) here:

brainly.com/question/32352473

#SPJ11

Allen and Beatrice Gardner taught a chimpanzee named Washoe to communicate using American Sign Language (ASL).

Allen and Beatrice Gardner, psychologists, conducted an experiment in the 1960s where they taught a chimpanzee named Washoe to communicate using American Sign Language (ASL). They raised Washoe as if she were a human child, providing her with a nurturing environment and exposing her to ASL from an early age.

Through consistent training and interaction, Washoe learned to understand and produce a wide range of signs. This groundbreaking experiment challenged the prevailing belief that only humans could use language and demonstrated the chimpanzee's ability to acquire language-like communication skills.

About Allen and Beatrice Gardner here:

https://brainly.com/question/16354679

#SPJ11

Gas station is involved in C. engaging in first-degree price discrimination.

To determine the correct option, we need to understand the concept of price discrimination and its different degrees. Price discrimination occurs when a seller charges different prices for the same product or service to different customers based on certain criteria.

First-degree price discrimination, also known as perfect price discrimination, happens when a seller charges each customer their maximum willingness to pay.

In this case, the gas station is charging different prices for different grades of gasoline (87 octane and 93 octane), which implies that they are charging based on the customer's perceived value or willingness to pay.

Therefore, the gas station is engaging in first-degree price discrimination, where each customer is charged a different price based on their individual preferences or needs.

Hence, the correct answer is C. engaging in first-degree.

For more such questions on price discrimination, click on:

https://brainly.com/question/25565797

#SPJ11

The total net income if all products are sold at the split-off point is $30,000.

The total net income if all products are sold after further processing is $195,000.

The incremental profit (loss) and decisions for each product are as follows:

Product 10: $30,000 - ($100,000 - $60,000) = -$10,000 (Loss), should be processed further.

Product 12: $35,000 - ($30,000 - $15,000) = $20,000, should be sold at the split-off point.

Product 14: $215,000 - ($150,000 - $55,000) = $120,000, should be sold at the split-off point.

The total net income using the results from the previous part is $230,000.

The net income is different from that determined in part (b). It is increasing by $35,000.

To know more about incremental profit, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29567211

#SPJ11

1.Variable cost is $6.40, contribution margin is $13.60. 2. Margin ratio is 68%, variable cost ratio is 32%. 3. Break-even units are 8000. 4. The total sales revenue will be equal to the total variable costs.

1. The variable cost per unit is the sum of the direct materials, direct labor, variable factory overhead, and variable selling and administrative expense, which is $2.10 + $1.25 + $2.00 + $1.05 = $6.40. The contribution margin per unit is the selling price minus the variable cost per unit, which is $20 - $6.40 = $13.60.

2. The contribution margin ratio is the contribution margin per unit divided by the selling price, which is $13.60 / $20 = 0.68 or 68%. The variable cost ratio is the variable cost per unit divided by the selling price, which is $6.40 / $20 = 0.32 or 32%.

3. The break-even units can be calculated by dividing the total fixed costs (fixed factory overhead + fixed selling and administrative expense) by the contribution margin per unit. In this case, it is ($56,590 + $38,610) / $13.60 = 8000 units.

4. The contribution margin income statement at the break-even number of units will show zero net income because the total contribution margin will be equal to the total fixed costs. The total sales revenue will be equal to the total variable costs.


By calculating the variable cost per unit and the contribution margin per unit, we can determine the portion of each sale that contributes to covering the fixed costs and generating a profit.

The contribution margin ratio and variable cost ratio provide insights into the profitability and cost structure of the company.

The break-even units indicate the minimum number of units that need to be sold in order to cover all fixed costs.

Finally, the contribution margin income statement at the break-even point shows the financial results when the company neither incurs a profit nor a loss, illustrating the relationship between sales, variable costs, and fixed costs.

learn more about margin ratio click here:brainly.com/question/17119386

#SPJ11

1. Contribution margin per unit = $13.60

2. Variable cost ratio = 0.32 or 32%

3. Break-even units = 8075 units

4. Contribution margin = $109,820

1. To calculate the variable cost per unit, we need to sum up the direct materials, direct labor, variable factory overhead, and variable selling and administrative expense.
Variable cost per unit = Direct materials + Direct labor + Variable factory overhead + Variable selling and administrative expense

Variable cost per unit = $2.10 + $1.25 + $2.00 + $1.05 = $6.40

To calculate the contribution margin per unit, we subtract the variable cost per unit from the selling price per unit.
Contribution margin per unit = Selling price per unit - Variable cost per unit

Contribution margin per unit = $20 - $6.40 = $13.60

2. The contribution margin ratio is the contribution margin per unit divided by the selling price per unit.
Contribution margin ratio = Contribution margin per unit / Selling price per unit

Contribution margin ratio = $13.60 / $20 = 0.68 or 68%

The variable cost ratio is the variable cost per unit divided by the selling price per unit.
Variable cost ratio = Variable cost per unit / Selling price per unit

Variable cost ratio = $6.40 / $20 = 0.32 or 32%

3. To calculate the break-even units, we divide the total fixed costs (fixed factory overhead + fixed selling and administrative expense) by the contribution margin per unit.
Break-even units = Total fixed costs / Contribution margin per unit

Break-even units = ($56,590 + $38,610) / $13.60 = 8075 units

4. To prepare a contribution margin income statement at the break-even number of units, we multiply the break-even units by the selling price per unit and subtract the total variable costs.
Total sales revenue = Break-even units * Selling price per unit

Total variable costs = Break-even units * Variable cost per unit

Contribution margin = Total sales revenue - Total variable costs

Contribution margin income statement:

Sales revenue: $20 * 8075 units = $161,500
Variable costs: $6.40 * 8075 units = $51,680
Contribution margin: $161,500 - $51,680 = $109,820

Please note that the calculations above assume that all units produced are sold, and there are no other costs or revenues involved.

To learn more about contribution, refer below:

https://brainly.com/question/29534784

#SPJ11

The monetary neutrality refers to the proposition that changes in the nominal money supply do not have any real effects on the economy.

This is a basic idea behind the monetarist approach to economics.

According to the monetary neutrality hypothesis, changes in the nominal money supply do not affect real variables like output and employment, but only affect nominal variables like the price level.

Question 15 Answer: The concept of 'monetary neutrality' is believed by the majority of economists and it means that changes in the nominal money supply does not have any real effects on the economy. This is a fundamental idea behind the monetarist approach to economics. According to the monetary neutrality hypothesis, changes in the nominal money supply do not affect real variables like output and employment, but only affect nominal variables like the price level.

Question 16 Answer: The given statement seems to be incorrect or incomplete, as it does not convey a clear meaning.

To learn more about Monetary Neutrality: https://brainly.com/question/16245225

#SPJ11

Answer:

Investors who sell short believe the price of the stock will decrease in value

Explanation:

A "short" position is generally the sale of a stock you do not own. Investors who sell short believe the price of the stock will decrease in value. If the price drops, you can buy the stock at the lower price and make a profit.

When an investor shorts a certain share, they are essentially betting that the price of that share will decrease in the future. They borrow shares from a broker, sell them immediately, and wait for the price to fall. If the price does decrease, they buy back the shares at a lower price and return them to the broker, making a profit. However, if the price increases, they may face unlimited losses.

When an investor shorts a certain share, they are essentially betting that the price of that share will decrease in the future. To do this, the investor borrows shares from a broker and immediately sells them on the market. This is known as 'shorting' the share.

The investor then waits for the price to fall. If the price does indeed decrease, the investor can buy back the shares at the lower price and return them to the broker. The difference between the selling price and the buying price is the profit made by the investor.

However, if the price of the share increases instead of decreasing, the investor may face losses. There is no limit to how much the price of a stock can increase, which means the potential losses for the investor can be unlimited.

Short selling is a risky strategy that requires careful analysis and market knowledge. It is often used by experienced investors and hedge funds to take advantage of downward price movements in the market.

Learn more:

About investor here:

https://brainly.com/question/33035723

#SPJ11

Optimal order quantity: 2057 units, Reorder point: 576 units, Holding cost: $2386.12, Ordering cost: $2431.60, Savings from price break: $49.96.

a. The optimal order quantity is 2057 units, and the reorder point is 576 units.

To calculate the order quantity, we can use the Economic Order Quantity (EOQ) formula:

EOQ = sqrt((2 * Annual Demand * Order Cost) / Holding Cost)

EOQ = sqrt((2 * 28,100 * $178) / (0.29 * $8)) ≈ 2057 units

To calculate the reorder point, we can use the formula:

Reorder Point = Average Weekly Demand * Lead Time + Safety Stock

Safety Stock = z * Standard Deviation of Weekly Demand

Given a service probability of 98%, the corresponding z-value can be obtained using Excel's NORMSINV() function. Let's assume the z-value is 2.05 (rounded to 2 decimal places).

Safety Stock = 2.05 * 25 ≈ 51 units

Reorder Point = 562 * 4 + 51 = 576 units

b. The annual holding cost is calculated by multiplying the average inventory level by the holding cost rate:

Average Inventory Level = EOQ / 2

Holding Cost = Average Inventory Level * Item Cost * Holding Cost Rate

Average Inventory Level = 2057 / 2 = 1028.5 units

Holding Cost = 1028.5 * $8 * 0.29 ≈ $2386.12

The annual ordering cost is the product of the number of orders placed per year and the order cost:

Number of Orders = Annual Demand / EOQ

Ordering Cost = Number of Orders * Order Cost

Number of Orders = 28,100 / 2057 ≈ 13.66

Ordering Cost = 13.66 * $178 ≈ $2431.60

c. If the price break is taken advantage of and the order quantity increases to 2100 units per order, the new annual ordering cost would be:

Number of Orders (with price break) = Annual Demand / Order Quantity (with price break)

Number of Orders (with price break) = 28,100 / 2100 ≈ 13.38

Ordering Cost (with price break) = Number of Orders (with price break) * Order Cost

Ordering Cost (with price break) = 13.38 * $178 ≈ $2381.64

The savings in annual ordering cost would be:

Savings = Ordering Cost (without price break) - Ordering Cost (with price break)

Savings = $2431.60 - $2381.64 ≈ $49.96

Learn more about EOQ

https://brainly.com/question/33135650

#SPJ11

Price discrimination means charging different prices for identical goods that have identical production costs. This statement is true and it's widely used by various businesses to increase profits.Paying wages according to race or sex rather than productivity is an example of discrimination. This is false as paying wages according to race or sex is unfair and biased, and is against labor laws.

Exploiting the working masses by charging the highest single price possible is a deceptive pricing strategy that aims to take advantage of consumers. This is false and goes against consumer rights.Eliminating all costs so that only profits are realized is impossible as every business incurs some kind of costs.

Thus, this statement is false.Perfect competition and monopolistic competition differ with respect to the elasticity of their demand curves, with respect to product differentiation, and with respect to influence over the price they charge. All of these describe differences between perfect competition and monopolistic competition. These statements are true as they point out significant differences between the two types of competition.

Demand curve elasticity: In perfect competition, demand curves are highly elastic, while in monopolistic competition, demand curves are less elastic.Product differentiation: Perfect competition involves selling standardized products, whereas in monopolistic competition, products are differentiated.Influence over price: In perfect competition, individual firms have no control over prices, while in monopolistic competition, firms have some control over prices.

To know more about Price discrimination :

https://brainly.com/question/25565797

#SPJ11

1. The example used in the We Make You Money Inc shows that  courage means accepting responsibility. 2. Yolanda is using the great man theory. 3. The leadership behavior is participative.

1. This example highlights that the CEO's refusal to admit mistakes demonstrates a lack of courage to accept responsibility for the company's situation, which ultimately led to its bankruptcy.

2.  Yolanda is focusing on the traits that made Martin Luther King a great leader, which aligns with the great man theory. This theory suggests that exceptional leaders possess inherent traits that differentiate them from others and contribute to their effectiveness as leaders.

3. The supervisor's behavior of allowing team members to do things their own way, encouraging creativity and uniqueness, aligns with a participative leadership style. Participative leaders involve their team members in decision-making processes, value their input, and foster a collaborative and inclusive environment.

Read more on great man theory here https://brainly.com/question/1759635

#SPJ1

By following these steps, you will be able to find the cost of goods sold for year two or three based on the beginning stock and changes in inventory. Remember to use the correct values provided in the question to ensure accuracy.

The term "beginning stock" refers to the quantity and value of inventory that a company has at the start of a specific period.

In question three, it is likely referring to the inventory at the beginning of year two or three.

To find the cost of goods sold (COGS) for year two or three, you need to consider the changes in inventory.

Here's a step-by-step explanation:

1. Determine the beginning stock value for year two or three.

This is the value of inventory at the start of the year, which may be given in the question or can be calculated using the previous year's ending stock.

2. Find the ending stock value for year one or two.

This is the value of inventory at the end of the previous year, which may be given in the question.

3. Calculate the cost of goods available for sale.

This is the sum of the beginning stock and any additional purchases during the year.

4. Subtract the ending stock value for year one or two from the cost of goods available for sale.

This will give you the cost of goods sold for year two or three.

learn more about: stock

https://brainly.com/question/26128641

#SPJ 11

Toyotomi Hideyoshi was indeed able to accomplish the unification of Japan and gain control over the country. However, he was not successful in his attempts to gain full control of Korea. The statement "Gain control of Korea" is the exception in the list of accomplishments attributed to Toyotomi Hideyoshi.

Toyotomi Hideyoshi was a powerful Japanese daimyo who played a significant role in the unification of Japan in the late 16th century. While he achieved many notable accomplishments, one thing he was not able to accomplish was gaining control of Korea.

Hideyoshi launched two military campaigns, known as the Japanese invasions of Korea (1592-1598), with the intention of conquering Korea and using it as a stepping stone for further expansion into China. However, despite initial successes, his campaigns ultimately ended in failure, and he was unable to achieve his goal of fully controlling Korea.

To know more about toyotomi hideyoshi here,

https://brainly.com/question/29610123

#SPJ4

Toyotomi Hideyoshi was able to accomplish all of the following except... Gain control of Korea.

some aristocratic 'yangban' became merchants,

or even peasants, over time.

False. Tax policy is not the only fiscal policy tool available to influence the path of the economy over time.

While tax policy is an important fiscal policy tool, it is not the sole method available for influencing the economy. Fiscal policy refers to the use of government spending and taxation to influence economic activity and achieve desired outcomes. Tax policy involves decisions regarding tax rates, deductions, exemptions, and credits. However, fiscal policy also includes government spending, which is another significant tool in shaping the economy.

Government spending can be used to stimulate economic growth, address infrastructure needs, invest in education and healthcare, provide social welfare programs, and support various sectors of the economy. By strategically allocating funds and directing spending towards specific areas, governments can influence economic activity and shape the overall trajectory of the economy.

Therefore, while tax policy is an essential component of fiscal policy, it is not the only tool available. Government spending plays an equally important role, and policymakers have the flexibility to use both tax policy and government spending to achieve their economic objectives.

Learn more about fiscal policy here:

https://brainly.com/question/31438357

#SPJ11

The main objective of the auditor in assessing business risks in the conduct of an audit is to identify and evaluate what could impact the financial statements and to design appropriate procedures to address those risks.

The assessment of business risks is a crucial step in the audit process. It involves identifying and understanding the risks that could affect the financial statements, such as fraud, errors, or significant events impacting the business.

The main objective is to evaluate the likelihood and potential impact of these risks on the accuracy and reliability of the financial information.By assessing business risks, the auditor can determine the areas that require more attention and develop a tailored audit approach.

This involves designing and implementing audit procedures that are responsive to the identified risks. The objective is to obtain sufficient and appropriate audit evidence to provide reasonable assurance that the financial statements are free from material misstatements.

The main objective of assessing business risks is to enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of the audit by focusing on areas of higher risk, ultimately ensuring the reliability and integrity of the financial statements.

To know more about business risks click here.

brainly.com/question/32694936

#SPJ11

An employer needs to use a protection system to ensure the safety of workers in a trench or excavation at a depth of 5 feet.

According to safety regulations and standards, when workers are working in a trench or excavation, an employer is required to use a protection system once the depth of the trench reaches 5 feet or more. The purpose of the protection system is to prevent cave-ins and ensure the safety of the workers. This system can include various measures such as sloping, shoring, or shielding to provide support and stability to the trench walls. Using a protection system helps mitigate the risk of accidents and injuries associated with trench work.

To know more about safety regulations here: brainly.com/question/29618608

#SPJ11

Shi Import-Export's weighted average cost of capital (WACC) is a financial metric that represents the average rate of return required by the company's investors.

By considering the target capital structure and the associated costs of debt, preferred stock, and common equity, the WACC can be calculated. In this case, Shi's WACC is determined to be a specific percentage, rounded to two decimal places.

To calculate Shi Import-Export's weighted average cost of capital (WACC), we need to consider the target capital structure and the associated costs of debt, preferred stock, and common equity.

Given:

Debt: $300 million

Preferred stock: $50 million

Total common equity: $250 million

Tax rate: 25%

Cost of debt (rd): 6%

Cost of preferred stock (rps): 7.7%

Cost of common equity (rs): 14%

Target capital structure:

Debt: 30%

Preferred stock: 5%

Common stock: 65%

Step 1: Calculate the weights of each component:

Weight of debt (wd) = Debt / (Debt + Preferred stock + Common equity)

wd = $300 million / ($300 million + $50 million + $250 million) = 0.5

Weight of preferred stock (wps) = Preferred stock / (Debt + Preferred stock + Common equity)

wps = $50 million / ($300 million + $50 million + $250 million) = 0.1

Weight of common equity (wcs) = Common equity / (Debt + Preferred stock + Common equity)

wcs = $250 million / ($300 million + $50 million + $250 million) = 0.4

Step 2: Calculate the cost of each component:

Cost of debt (rd) = 6%

Cost of preferred stock (rps) = 7.7%

Cost of common equity (rs) = 14%

Step 3: Calculate the WACC:

WACC = (wd * rd) + (wps * rps) + (wcs * rs)

WACC = (0.5 * 0.06) + (0.1 * 0.077) + (0.4 * 0.14)

WACC = 0.03 + 0.0077 + 0.056

WACC = 0.0937 or 9.37%

Therefore, Shi Import-Export's weighted average cost of capital (WACC) is 9.37%, rounded to two decimal places. This indicates the required average rate of return that Shi needs to generate to satisfy its investors based on its target capital structure and associated costs of capital.

To learn more about capital click here brainly.com/question/32408251

#SPJ11

1. The common support assumption is necessary for identification of the ATE:
True. The common support assumption is a crucial requirement for estimating the Average Treatment Effect (ATE) in observational studies.

The common support assumption states that for every value of the treatment variable, there should be a comparable set of units with similar covariate values.

This ensures that the treatment and control groups are comparable, allowing for a valid estimation of the treatment effect. Without the common support assumption, it becomes challenging to identify the causal effect of the treatment accurately.

2. The Propensity Score approach solves the curse of dimensionality:
False. The Propensity Score approach is a useful method to address confounding in observational studies by estimating the probability of receiving treatment given a set of observed covariates. However, it does not directly solve the curse of dimensionality.

The curse of dimensionality refers to the challenges that arise when working with high-dimensional data, where the number of variables or features is large relative to the sample size. While the Propensity Score approach can help reduce the dimensionality by summarizing the covariates into a single score, it does not eliminate the need to consider the dimensionality issue when analyzing the data.

3. It is always preferred to control for as many covariates as possible to reduce the scope for selection bias:
False. While controlling for covariates is important to minimize selection bias, including too many covariates can lead to overfitting and introduce other issues.

Overfitting occurs when the model becomes too complex and fits the noise or random fluctuations in the data instead of the underlying relationship. It is essential to strike a balance by including covariates that are relevant to the research question and that have a plausible causal relationship with the outcome variable.

Adding irrelevant or weakly related covariates can lead to biased estimates and reduce the precision of the treatment effect estimation. Therefore, it is crucial to carefully select and justify the covariates to control for in order to minimize selection bias effectively.

For more such questions on observational studies

https://brainly.com/question/4758113

#SPJ11

The pre-tax value of the invoice is approximately $220.

To calculate the pre-tax value of the invoice, we can work backwards from the total amount including taxes.

Let X be the pre-tax value of the invoice.

The GST (5%) is calculated on the pre-tax value: 0.05 * X.

The PST (7%) is also calculated on the pre-tax value: 0.07 * X.

Adding the taxes to the pre-tax value gives us the total invoice amount:

X + 0.05X + 0.07X = $246.40.

Combining like terms:

1.12X = $246.40.

Dividing both sides by 1.12:

X = $246.40 / 1.12 ≈ $220.

Therefore, the pre-tax value of the invoice is approximately $220.

To know more about invoice , visit:

https://brainly.com/question/32570394

#SPJ11

The assumption that people always make the best decision in economics means that individuals are assumed to be rational decision-makers, aiming to maximize their own utility or satisfaction based on their self-interest. So, the correct option is D.

The assumption that people always make the best decision, in the context of economics, is interpreted to mean that people are assumed to be rational. The correct answer to the question "The assumption that people always make the best decision is interpreted to mean that in economics, people are assumed to be..." is D. rational.

In economics, the assumption of rationality means that individuals are expected to make decisions based on their own self-interest and to maximize their utility or satisfaction. It assumes that individuals have consistent preferences and will choose the option that provides them with the greatest benefit or value.

This assumption of rationality forms the basis for many economic models and theories. It allows economists to analyze how individuals and firms make choices, allocate resources, and interact in markets. However, it is important to note that the assumption of rationality is an idealized concept and does not imply that individuals always make perfect or optimal decisions in practice.

In summary, in economics, the assumption that people always make the best decision means that individuals are assumed to be rational decision-makers, aiming to maximize their utility or satisfaction based on their own self-interest.

Learn more about economics

https://brainly.com/question/31640573

#SPJ11

No, we cannot reasonably assert that the average proof of the vodka for the entire process is 99 proof based solely on the Central Limit Theorem.

The Central Limit Theorem states that for a sufficiently large sample size, the sampling distribution of the sample mean will be approximately normally distributed, regardless of the shape of the population distribution. However, it does not guarantee that the sample mean will equal the population mean.

In this case, while the Central Limit Theorem allows us to make inferences about the sampling distribution, it does not provide direct information about the true population mean. The fact that the grand mean of the samples is 99 proof does not necessarily imply that the average proof of the entire vodka making process is also 99 proof.

To make a reasonable assertion about the average proof of the entire process, further analysis and statistical methods are required. These may include hypothesis testing, confidence intervals, or additional sampling to estimate the population mean accurately. Hence, based solely on the Central Limit Theorem, you cannot reasonably assert that the average proof of the vodka for the entire process is 99 proof.

Learn more about Central Limit Theorem. here:

https://brainly.com/question/14806066

#SPJ11