Using the substitution u=2x+1, on [0,2] the integral of sqrt(2x+1)dx is equivalent to

Answer: 13,-11

Step-by-step explanation: if it's dilation there's a correlation between the two so I think if you just subtract the c from the c now and get 2,1 and you then subtract that from b you should get your answer

As per the probability, the project manager can estimate that the project will take 32.28 weeks to complete with a 90% confidence level.

To convert the project completion distribution to the standard normal distribution, the project manager needs to calculate the z-score, which represents the number of standard deviations away from the mean. The formula for the z-score is:

z = (x - μ) / σ

Where x is the completion time, μ is the mean of the distribution (30 weeks), and σ is the square root of the variance (√(2.78)).

Using a standard normal distribution table or calculator, the project manager can find the z-score corresponding to the 90th percentile, which is approximately 1.28.

To find the completion time that would be exceeded with a probability of only 10%, the project manager can use the inverse of the z-score formula:

x = z * σ + μ

Plugging in the values, the estimated completion time with a 90% confidence level is:

x = 1.28 * √(2.78) + 30 = 32.28 weeks

To know more about probability here

https://brainly.com/question/11234923

#SPJ4

Answer:

Part A:

[tex]3 {x}^{10} = 3(x)(x)(x)(x)(x)(x)(x)(x)(x)(x) [/tex]

[tex]48 {x}^{2} = 2(2)(2)(3)(x)(x)[/tex]

So the GCF = 3x^2.

Part B:

[tex]3 {x}^{10} - 48 {x}^{2} = [/tex]

[tex]3 {x}^{2} ( {x}^{8} - 16) = [/tex]

[tex]3 {x}^{2} ( {x}^{4} - 4)( {x}^{4} + 4) = [/tex]

[tex]3 {x}^{2} ( {x}^{2} - 2)( {x}^{2} + 2)(( {x}^{4} + 4 {x}^{2} + 4) - 4 {x}^{2} ) = [/tex]

[tex]3 {x}^{2} ( {x}^{2} - 2)( {x}^{2} + 2)( {( {x}^{2} + 2)}^{2} - {(2x)}^{2} ) = [/tex]

[tex]3 {x}^{2} ( {x}^{2} - 2)( {x}^{2} + 2)( {x}^{2} - 2x + 2)( {x}^{2} + 2x + 2)[/tex]

The value of x is 3.10

Pythagoras theorem states the sum of the squares of the leg of a right triangle is equal to the square of hypotenuse.

c² = a² + b²

Therefore,

(2x)² = (x-2)² +( x+3)²

4x² = x²- 4x +4 + x²+6x +9

collecting like terms

4x²-x²-x² -6x+4x -13 = 0

2x²-2x-13 = 0

Using formula method

x = (-b ± √b²-4ac)/2a

x = -(-2) ±√ -2)²-4× 2 × -13)/4

= 2±√ 4+104)/4

= 2±√108)/4

x = (2+10.39)/4 or (2-10.39)/4

x = 3.10 or -2.10

therefore the value of x is 3.10

learn more about Pythagoras theorem from

https://brainly.com/question/1214333

#SPJ1

A right angled triangle with height = 7, base = 11, by using the Pythagorean theorem, we can calculate the hypotenuse is approximately 13. Therefore, the missing side, x = 13.

In a right angled triangle, using the Pythagorean theorem: sum of the squares of the base and height is equal to the square of the hypotenuse, we can find the hypotenuse x.

[tex]x^2 = 7^2 + 11^2[/tex]

[tex]x^2 = 49 + 121[/tex]

[tex]x^2 = 170[/tex]

Taking the square root of both sides, we get:

x ≈ 13.0384

Rounding this to the nearest tenth, we get:

x ≈ 13.0

Therefore, the length of x is approximately 13.0 units (rounded to the nearest tenth).

Know more about Pythagorean theorem,

https://brainly.com/question/23715284

#SPJ1

Answer:

(5x)(2x) = 202.5

10x^2 = 202.5

x^2 = 20.25, so x = 4.5

Suppose that the correlation between educational level attained and yearly income is +0.68. This indicates that there is a positive and strong relationship between educational level and yearly income.

It means that as the level of education attained increases, the yearly income also tends to increase. However, it is important to note that correlation does not imply causation, and there could be other factors that contribute to the relationship between education and income.

Based on the provided correlation coefficient of +0.68 between educational level attained and yearly income, we know that there is a positive and moderately strong relationship between the two variables. As a person's education level increases, their yearly income is also likely to increase.

Visit here to learn more about correlation coefficient  : https://brainly.com/question/15577278
#SPJ11

The probability of four successes in this binomial distribution is 0.2668, or approximately 26.68%. This means that if we conduct 9 trials with a 20% chance of success on each trial, we would expect to get exactly 4 successes with a probability of 0.2668.

To find the probability of four successes in a binomial random variable, we use the formula for the probability mass function (PMF) of a binomial distribution:

P(X=k) = (n choose k) * [tex]p^k[/tex] * (1-p)[tex]^(n-k)[/tex]

where n is the number of trials, p is the probability of success on each trial, k is the number of successes, and (n choose k) is the binomial coefficient, which represents the number of ways to choose k successes from n trials.

In this case, we have n = 9, p = 0.2, and k = 4. So, we can plug these values into the formula:

P(X=4) = (9 choose 4) * 0.[tex]2^4[/tex] * (1-0.2)[tex]^(9-4)[/tex]

= (126) * 0.[tex]2^4[/tex] * 0[tex].8^5[/tex]

= 0.2668

Therefore, the probability of four successes in this binomial distribution is 0.2668, or approximately 26.68%. This means that if we conduct 9 trials with a 20% chance of success on each trial, we would expect to get exactly 4 successes with a probability of 0.2668.

Learn more about binomial distribution i

https://brainly.com/question/31197941

#SPJ4

If the probability of rain is P, because there are only two outcomes, we know that the probability that will not rain is 1 - P

Let's say that the probability of rain tomorrow is P. There are two possible events here:

Then the second event is the negation of the first (Thus the probability is the composition), and notice that one of these events will happen, then the sum of the probabilities must be 1, then the probability that tomorrow will not rain is:

probability of not rain = 1 - P

Learn more about probability at:

https://brainly.com/question/25870256

#SPJ1

Let (xn) be a sequence of positive real numbers that converges to a positive number. We aim to show that the set {x_n : n ∈ N} is bounded below by a positive number. Since the sequence converges to a positive number, we can choose an ε > 0 such that for all sufficiently large n, |x_n - L| < ε, where L is the limit of the sequence. By considering the inequality x_n > L - ε, we can see that all terms of the sequence are greater than or equal to a positive number, thereby establishing the boundedness from below.

Since the sequence (xn) converges to L, for any ε > 0, there exists a positive integer N such that for all n ≥ N, |x_n - L| < ε. This means that eventually, all terms of the sequence will be arbitrarily close to L.

Now, consider the inequality x_n > L - ε. For all n ≥ N, we have |x_n - L| < ε, which implies L - ε < x_n. Since L and ε are positive, we can rearrange the inequality to get x_n > L - ε.

Therefore, for all n ≥ N, we have x_n > L - ε, and since ε can be chosen to be any positive number, we can conclude that all terms of the sequence (xn) are greater than or equal to L - ε, which is a positive number.

Hence, the set {x_n : n ∈ N} is bounded below by a positive number, as desired.

Learn more about Sequence:

brainly.com/question/30262438

#SPJ11

Kyle may make ten unique solids by utilizing four identical unit cubes.

To create a solid, Kyle can glue the cubes together in different configurations.

Let's break down the possibilities based on the number of cubes that are glued together.

⇒ If all four cubes are glued together, there is only one possible solid.

⇒ If three cubes are glued together, there are four possible configurations: a straight line, an L-shape, a T-shape, and a corner shape.

⇒ If two cubes are glued together, there are three possible configurations: side by side, stacked, or at a right angle.

⇒ If only one cube is glued to another, there are two possible configurations: attached side to side or attached face to face.

To find the total number of distinct solids, we need to add up all the possible configurations.

⇒  1 (all four cubes glued together) + 4 (three cubes glued together) + 3 (two cubes glued together) + 2 (one cube glued to another)

So the answer is 10 distinct solids that Kyle can create using four identical unit cubes.

Learn more about the line visit:

https://brainly.com/question/18831322

#SPJ12

Completing the squares for our quadratic equation we will get:

(3x - 2)^2 + 32 = 0

Here we have the quadratic equation:

3x^2-12x+36=0

We can rewrite our quadratic equation as follows:

3x^2 - 2*2*3x + 36= 0

Now, remember that the perfect square trinomial is:

(a + b)^2 = a^2 + 2ab + b^2

We can see that a = 3x and b = -2, then we need to add and subtract (-2)^2 = 4

We will get:

3x^2 - 2*2*3x + 4 - 4 + 36= 0

(3x - 2)^2 -4 + 36  =0

(3x - 2)^2 + 32 = 0

That is the equation with squares complete.

learn more about quadratic equations at:

https://brainly.com/question/1214333

#SPJ1

(a) Number of ways to line up 10 members =10! =3,628,800 number of ways so that VP and president are next to each other 2.9!

(b) To line up the ten people if the VP must be beside the president in the photo 725,760 ways.

(c) To line up the ten people if the president must be next to the secretary and the VP must be next to the treasure is:  161,280 ways.

a). To line up the ten people with no restrictions in arrangement; we have;

n! = 10! = 10 × 9 × 8 × 7 × 6 × 5 × 4 × 3 × 2 × 1

= 3,628,800 ways.

b). To line up the ten people if the VP must be beside the president in the photo;

then, there are 9 entities as the VP and president are considered as one entity. However, there are 2! ways to arrange the president and vp, we have:

=> 9! × 2!

=  725,760 ways.

c). To line up the ten people if the president must be next to the secretary and the VP must be next to the treasure we have:

= 8! × 2! × 2!

= 161,280 ways.

Learn more about Permutation at:

https://brainly.com/question/30649574

#SPJ4

The given question is incomplete, complete question is:

ten members of a club are lining up in a row for a photograph. the club has one president, one vp, one secretary, and one treasurer. (a) how many ways are there to line up the ten people? (b) how many ways are there to line up the ten people if the vp must be beside the president in the photo? (c) how many ways are there to line up the ten people if the president must be next to the secretary and the vp must be next to the treasurer?

The values of W and X that make NOPQ a parallelogram are:

W = -5w + 11

X = 3x

A quadrilateral with two sets of parallel sides is referred to as a parallelogram. In a parallelogram, the opposing sides are of equal length, and the opposing angles are of equal size.

To determine the values of W and X that make NOPQ a parallelogram, we need to find the conditions under which the opposite sides of the quadrilateral are parallel.

The coordinates of the points N, O, P, and Q are given as follows:

N: (w+7, 5w-5)

O: (3/2x, 3)

P: (?, ?)

Q: (?, ?)

For NOPQ to be a parallelogram, the vector from N to O should be equal to the vector from P to Q, and the vector from O to P should be equal to the vector from Q to N.

The vector from N to O is:

NO = (3/2x - (w+7), 3 - (5w-5))

   = (3/2x - w - 7, -5w + 8)

The vector from O to P should be equal to the vector from Q to N. Thus:

OP = (P_x - (3/2x), P_y - 3)

QN = ((w+7) - Q_x, (5w-5) - Q_y)

Equating the corresponding components, we get the following equations:

3/2x - w - 7 = P_x - (3/2x)

-5w + 8 = P_y - 3

w + 7 = (w+7) - Q_x

5w - 5 = (5w-5) - Q_y

Simplifying these equations, we find:

P_x = 3x

P_y = -5w + 11

Q_x = w + 7

Q_y = 5w

Therefore, the values of W and X that make NOPQ a parallelogram are:

W = -5w + 11

X = 3x

Learn more about parallelogram on:

https://brainly.com/question/27846700

#SPJ4

Answer:

To find the greatest common factor (GCF) of the list of terms 30x^3, 110x^4, and 60x^5, we can begin by factoring each term into its prime factors:

30x^3 = 2 * 3 * 5 * x * x * x

110x^4 = 2 * 5 * 11 * x * x * x * x

60x^5 = 2 * 2 * 3 * 5 * x * x * x * x * x

Next, we can identify the common factors among the three terms. These are 2, 5, and x^3. The GCF is the product of these common factors:

GCF = 2 * 5 * x^3 = 10x^3

Therefore, the greatest common factor of 30x^3, 110x^4, and 60x^5 is 10x^3.

Step-by-step explanation:

the probability of getting a sample mean of 96 or lower is essentially zero

We can use the central limit theorem to approximate the sampling distribution of the sample mean as normal with mean μ = 650 and standard deviation σ/√n = 120/√30 ≈ 21.87, where n = 30 is the sample size.

Then, we want to find the probability that the sample mean is less than a certain value. We can standardize this value using the z-score:

z = (x - μ) / (σ/√n) = (96 - 650) / (120/√30) ≈ -16.07

Using a standard normal distribution table or calculator, we can find that the probability of getting a z-score of -16.07 or lower is essentially zero (less than 0.0001).

To learn more about probability visit:

brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ11

We conclude that there is convincing evidence to reject the null hypothesis. Therefore, the data provide convincing evidence that the distribution has changed.

Based on the given information, a chi-square goodness-of-fit test was conducted to determine whether there is convincing evidence that the distribution has changed. The test statistic is 10.13 and the p-value is 0.0175.

To interpret these results, we need to compare the p-value to a predetermined significance level (α), which is usually set at 0.05.

Step 1: Compare the p-value to the significance level
- If the p-value ≤ α, then there is convincing evidence to reject the null hypothesis (i.e., the distribution has changed).
- If the p-value > α, then there is not enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis (i.e., no convincing evidence that the distribution has changed).

In this case, the p-value (0.0175) is less than the typical significance level (0.05)

Learn more about Null hypothesis here: brainly.com/question/28920252

#SPJ11

Answer:

There were 8 cows and 12 horses at a farm. 5 horses ran away. How many horses were left?

7 because it's not saying anything about cows. Only that there are 8 so if there were 12 horses and 5 ran away, 12-5=7 because there were 12 horses at a farm and 5 ran away so that would equal 7

Therefore, The answer is 7.

The zeros of the polynomial f(x) are the values of x that make f(x) equal to zero. We can find the zeros of f(x) by setting the polynomial equal to zero and solving for x:

f(x) = (x-5)²6 (x²-25)²7 = 0

The polynomial f(x) has two factors, each of which contributes to the zeros of the polynomial:

Factor 1: (x-5)²6

This factor is equal to zero when x-5=0, or x=5. Therefore, the polynomial f(x) has a zero of multiplicity 6 at x=5.

Factor 2: (x²-25)²7

This factor is equal to zero when x²-25=0, or x=±5. Therefore, the polynomial f(x) has two more zeros at x=±5. Each of these zeros has a multiplicity of 7, since the factor (x²-25) is raised to the 7th power.

Therefore, the zeros of f(x) are x=5 and x=±5, with multiplicities of 6 and 7, respectively.In summary

To know more about polynomial f(x)

https://brainly.com/question/29199219?

#SPJ4

The depth of the scientist below sea level after traveling downward for 102 seconds can be found by multiplying her speed by the time she traveled:

Distance = Speed x Time

Distance = 4.2 feet/second x 102 seconds

Distance = 428.4 feet

Since she traveled straight down, this distance is also her depth below sea level.

Next, we need to find how far she ascended. The distance she traveled upward can be found in the same way:

Distance = Speed x Time

Distance = 1.9 feet/second x 112 seconds

Distance = 212.8 feet

However, since she traveled upward, this distance is subtracted from her previous depth:

Final depth below sea level = Initial depth below sea level - Distance traveled upward

Final depth below sea level = 428.4 feet - 212.8 feet

Final depth below sea level = 215.6 feet

Therefore, the scientist is 215.6 feet below sea level at this point.

Learn more about Depth here:- brainly.com/question/28516504

#SPJ11

The 95% confidence interval for 2007 returns is -29.2% to 49.2%. We can calculate it in the following manner.

To calculate the 95% confidence interval for 2007 returns of stocks in the S&P 500, we first need to determine the margin of error. We can use the formula:

Margin of Error = z* (standard deviation / sqrt(n))

Where z* is the z-score for the desired level of confidence, which is 1.96 for a 95% confidence interval, standard deviation is 20%, and n is the sample size (which we assume to be 1).

So, Margin of Error = 1.96 * (0.20 / sqrt(1)) = 0.392

Next, we need to determine the range within which the true population mean is likely to lie. We can calculate this by adding and subtracting the margin of error from the sample mean. In this case, the sample mean is the average annual return over the period 1886-2006, which is 10%.

So, the 95% confidence interval for 2007 returns is:

10% +/- 0.392 or 9.608% to 10.392%

Therefore, we can be 95% confident that the true average annual return for stocks in the S&P 500 for the year 2007 falls between 9.608% and 10.392%.

Based on the provided information, the average annual return for stocks in the S&P 500 from 1886-2006 is 10%, and the standard deviation is 20%. To calculate a 95% confidence interval for 2007 returns, we can use the formula:

Confidence Interval = Mean ± (1.96 * Standard Deviation)

In this case, the mean is 10%, and the standard deviation is 20%. Plugging in these values, we get:

Confidence Interval = 10% ± (1.96 * 20%)

Confidence Interval = 10% ± 39.2%

Thus, the 95% confidence interval for 2007 returns is -29.2% to 49.2%.

Visit here to learn more about confidence interval brainly.com/question/24131141

#SPJ11

We can see here that a proper use of unit multipliers to convert 24 square feet per minute to square inches per second is: B. 12 ft²/1 min × 1 ft/12 in. × 1 ft/12 in. × 1 min/60 sec.

A multiplier in mathematics is a factor that is multiplied by another quantity or number. It is employed to change the value of a number or quantity by a specific percentage.

We can see here that showing a proper use of unit multipliers to convert 24 square feet per minute to square inches per second, we will have:

Multiplying by a conversion factor to cancel out "feet" and convert to "inches". Since 1 foot = 12 inches, we can use the conversion factor: 1 ft/12 in.

Thus, we have that the multiplier will be: 12 ft²/1 min × 1 ft/12 in. × 1 ft/12 in. × 1 min/60 sec.

Learn more about multiplier on https://brainly.com/question/15883095

#SPJ1

The probability of return was the least for the Dining hall method and greatest for the Class delivery method. Therefore, E is the correct answer here.

There cannot be a positive or negative association between a categorical and a numerical variable. here the delivery method is a categorical variable.

We cannot determine what the total number for any of the delivery methods was as we are only given the conditional probability of whether they were returned or not.

We can clearly see that the probability of return was the least for the Dining hall method and greatest for the Class delivery method. Therefore, E is the correct answer here.

Read more about probability here:

https://brainly.com/question/25870256

#SPJ1

To find the amount of the 1.6 thousand gallons left at the end of the week, we need to determine the demand for the week and subtract it from the initial stock.

First, let's define the function h(x) as the amount left when the demand is x.

1. Identify the demand function for the week. This information is missing in your question, but let's assume it is given as d(x).

2. Calculate the demand for the week by evaluating the function d(x) at the end of the week. Let's assume the week is represented by the variable "t". Evaluate d(t) to find the demand for the week.

3. Subtract the demand for the week from the initial stock to find the remaining amount: h(t) = 1.6 thousand gallons - d(t).

4. Round your answer to three decimal places to get the final result.

Without the specific demand function, I cannot provide a numerical answer.

However, you can follow these steps with the given demand function to find the amount of the 1.6 thousand gallons expected to be left at the end of the week.

learn more about function here:brainly.com/question/12431044

#SPJ11

ans. option (a) 4

we take components of 4[tex]\sqrt{2}[/tex]

so 4[tex]\sqrt{2}[/tex] sin 45

putting values we get 4[tex]\sqrt{2}[/tex] /[tex]\sqrt{2}[/tex]

thus the answer is 4

Answer:

The figure is trapizium so opposite sides are suplementary which is their sum =180

112° + x = 180°

x = 180° - 112° =68°

Hope it is correct !

The original number that Gavyn was thinking of was 15.3.

Let x be the original number.

According to the problem, when Gavyn subtracts 9 from x, he gets an answer of 6.3. This can be written as;

x - 9 = 6.3

To solve for x, we can add 9 to both sides of the equation;

x - 9 + 9 = 6.3 + 9

Simplifying the right side gives;

x = 15.3

Therefore, the original number that Gavyn was thinking of was 15.3.

Learn more about numbers here: https://brainly.com/question/25734188

#SPJ4

The total surface area of the pyramid is 817 ft squared.

The surface area of the pyramid Jane is painting can be calculated as follows:

area of the pyramid = A + 1 / 2 ps

where

Therefore,

A = 19² = 361 ft²

p = 4(19) = 76 ft

s = 12 ft

Total surface area of the pyramid =  361 + 1 / 2 (76)(12)

Total surface area of the pyramid = 361 + 456

Total surface area of the pyramid = 817 ft²

learn more on pyramid here: https://brainly.com/question/12706627

#SPJ1

As per the question, the complexity that ranks between the other two is O(n^2) - Quadratic (or Polynomial).

As we compare the run-time complexities, it's crucial to examine the function’s growth with an increase in input size (n).

Let us analyze the growth rates:

Exponential (O(2^n)): The function doubles for each increment in n. This is very fast growth.

Quadratic (O(n^2)): The function grows proportional to the square of n. This is slower growth compared to exponential but faster than logarithmic.

Logarithmic (O(log n)): The function grows very slowly as n increases. The growth rate is less than linear (O(n)).

So the ranking, from slowest to fastest growth, is:

O(log n) - Logarithmic

O(n^2) - Quadratic (or Polynomial)

O(2^n) - Exponential

As per the question, the complexity that ranks between the other two is O(n^2) - Quadratic (or Polynomial).

Read more about quadratic run-time complexity here:

https://brainly.com/question/24488401
#SPJ1