In 1620, a group of English colonists called the Pilgrims established the Plymouth Colony in Massachusetts. They had to deal with bad weather, illness, and food shortages, among other difficulties.
2. Mormon PioneersDuring the middle of the 19th century, a number of members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints moved from Illinois to Utah in the west. They had to deal with unfriendly non-Mormon communities, harsh weather, and a lack of resources, among other challenges.
How might zinn have fashioned the political system of the US and would this have proven beneficial to society as a whole
Zinn's assessment of US history correlate more with Republican views rather than the Federalist's view.
He was quite sympathetic to the nation's social and economic elites and believes that the Constitution does not provide adequate protection for certain segments of the American population.
Further more, he explained that democracy's problem in post-Revolutionary America was not primarily due to Constitutional limitations on voting because rather, had more to do with the social classes of the time.
He was also critical of Madison's argument of Federalist by aksing if the goal of the government is to just maintain order between two equally matched groups.
Read more about Zinn on:
brainly.com/question/13847372
#SPJ1
Which of these divides the earth in half? *
Compass rose
South Pole
equator
Border
The equator divides the Earth into two equal halves, the Northern Hemisphere and the Southern Hemisphere.
The equator is the geographic line that divides the Earth into two equal halves: the Northern Hemisphere and the Southern Hemisphere. It is an imaginary circle that lies equidistant from the Earth's poles and is located at 0 degrees latitude. The equator serves as a reference point for measuring latitude.
The compass rose, on the other hand, is a navigational tool that displays the cardinal directions (north, south, east, and west) and their intermediate points on a map or a chart. It does not divide the Earth into halves, but rather provides orientation and direction.
The South Pole is the southernmost point on Earth, situated at the bottom of the planet. It is not a line that divides the Earth in half, but rather a geographic point.
"Border" is a general term used to describe the line or boundary that separates two regions or countries. While borders can divide land areas, they do not necessarily divide the Earth in half.
Therefore, the correct answer is the equator, as it is the line that divides the Earth into two equal halves, the Northern Hemisphere and the Southern Hemisphere.
For more such question on Earth
https://brainly.com/question/28508029
#SPJ11
African American men and women helped change the military during World War II by and they later used this experience to advance civil rights by
African American men and women served during World War II helped change the military by challenging segregation and discrimination proving their abilities and patriotism.
To advance civil rights by engaging in activism legal challenges and influencing public perception.
African American men and women played significant roles in World War II both in the military and on the home front.
Their contributions during the war had a profound impact on the advancement of civil rights in the United States.
Some key ways in which they helped change the military during World War II and later used this experience to advance civil rights:
Military Service:
African American men and women served in segregated units within the U.S. military during World War II.
Despite facing racial discrimination and limited opportunities for advancement their service demonstrated their dedication and patriotism.
Their involvement challenged prevailing stereotypes and prejudices about African Americans' abilities and commitment to the nation.
Double Victory Campaign:
African American leaders and organizations, such as the National Urban League and the NAACP launched the Double Victory Campaign during World War II.
The campaign aimed to fight against fascism abroad and racism at home.
It highlighted the irony of African Americans fighting for freedom and democracy overseas while facing discrimination and segregation in their own country.
Tuskegee Airmen:
The Tuskegee Airmen were a group of African American pilots, navigators and support personnel who served in the Army Air Forces during World War II.
They overcame significant barriers and prejudice to become one of the most distinguished fighter groups of the war.
Their exemplary combat record and professionalism helped dispel the myth of African Americans' inferiority and contributed to the desegregation of the military.
Civil Rights Activism:
After World War II many African American veterans returned home with a newfound sense of confidence and determination.
They had fought for freedom and equality abroad and were not willing to accept segregation and discrimination in their own country any longer. African American veterans became important figures in the civil rights movement using their military experience to advocate for equal rights and social justice.
Legal Challenges:
African American veterans and civil rights activists used legal means to challenge segregation and discrimination.
Their experiences during the war influenced court cases and legal strategies that sought to dismantle segregationist policies.
The landmark Supreme Court case of Brown v.
Board of Education in 1954 declared segregation in public schools unconstitutional drew upon the arguments and evidence presented by African American lawyers and veterans.
Public Perception:
The bravery and sacrifices of African American servicemen and servicewomen during World War II helped shift public perception and challenge racial stereotypes.
Their contributions to the war effort were widely recognized, and their actions highlighted the inconsistencies of racial discrimination.
This recognition helped pave the way for broader support for civil rights reforms in the years that followed.
African American men and women who served during World War II helped change the military by challenging segregation and discrimination proving their abilities and patriotism.
They later used their wartime experiences to advance civil rights by engaging in activism legal challenges and influencing public perception. Their collective efforts played a significant role in the broader struggle for racial equality in the United States.
For similar questions on World War II
https://brainly.com/question/651584
#SPJ11
What happened in 2018 that made the collapse of SVB more likely? What was the rationale for doing so?
The tightening of regulations and scrutiny from the US Federal Reserve and Securities and Exchange Commission made the collapse of SVB more likely.
In 2018, several factors contributed to the increased likelihood of the collapse of SVB.
One major factor was the tightening of regulations and scrutiny on the tech industry, particularly in regards to data privacy and security.
SVB, which primarily provided banking services to startups and tech companies, faced increased pressure to ensure their clients were compliant with these regulations.
Additionally, the escalating trade tensions between the US and China, which had a significant impact on the tech industry, put SVB's business at risk.
The bank's heavy reliance on venture capital funding also made it vulnerable to market volatility.
The rationale for the potential collapse was that these factors, combined with a possible economic downturn, could create a perfect storm that would make it difficult for SVB to sustain its business model.
For more such questions on Commission:
https://brainly.com/question/881794
#SPJ11
How did Hitler achieve to persecute the Jewish?
Through a set of laws and programs known as the "Final Solution," Hitler and the Nazi Party were able to persecute and eventually murder Jews.
Hitler became Germany's chancellor in 1933 and began adopting laws intended at marginalizing and discriminating against Jews. He enacted legislation that made it illegal for Jews to work in certain occupations.
Hitler and the Nazi Party persecuted and exterminated Jews using a mix of laws, policies, and propaganda, and their acts have been universally criticized as a flagrant violation of human rights and a crime against humanity.
Learn more about Jewish, here:
https://brainly.com/question/11650171
#SPJ1
Read the passage and answer the question.
The Son of Heaven [the emperor] mounts his jade carriage drawn by dragon-like horses, on which is displayed the great standard with the likenesses of the sun and moon upon it, along with dragons ascending and descending. In this the emperor goes to worship the sun outside the east gate.
The description of the role of the ruler given in this passage differed most strongly from rulers in which of the following?
(Choice A) Ancient Mesopotamia
(Choice B) Classical Athens
(Choice C) Achaemenid Persia
(Choice D) Ancient Egypt
(A) Ruler in Ancient Mesopotamia was primarily a lawgiver.
(B) Ruler in Classical Athens was a representative of the people.
(C) Ruler in Achaemenid Persia was expected to be virtuous.
(D) Ruler in Ancient Egypt was primarily a religious figure.
The passage describes the role of the ruler, the Son of Heaven or emperor, in ancient China. Based on this description, we can compare the role of the ruler in China to the rulers of the four other options provided: Ancient Mesopotamia, Classical Athens, Achaemenid Persia, and Ancient Egypt.
In Ancient Mesopotamia, rulers such as the Babylonian king Hammurabi were responsible for maintaining law and order in society through a code of laws. The king was considered the representative of the gods on earth and had both religious and political authority. The role of the Mesopotamian ruler was therefore primarily as a lawgiver and enforcer, rather than as a religious figure.
In Classical Athens, rulership was based on a democratic system in which all citizens had a voice and a vote in government. The city was ruled by a council of citizens and officials, rather than by a single individual. The Athenian ruler was therefore more of a representative of the people, rather than a traditional monarch.
In Achaemenid Persia, the Persian king was considered the "King of Kings" and had absolute power over his subjects. However, the king was also expected to act as a just and wise ruler, guided by the principle of "good thoughts, good words, and good deeds." The role of the Persian king was therefore one of both power and virtue, and he was expected to lead by example.
In Ancient Egypt, the ruler, or pharaoh, was believed to be a god-king with absolute power and authority over his subjects. The pharaoh was responsible for maintaining the cosmic order of the universe and was associated with various gods and goddesses. The role of the pharaoh was therefore primarily religious, with the king serving as an intermediary between the people and the gods.
Comparing the descriptions of rulership in these five regions and time periods, we can see that the role of the ruler in China was unique in its combination of political and religious authority. The Son of Heaven was both a powerful political leader and a religious figure, responsible for worshipping the sun and moon and maintaining cosmic balance.
The ruler in Ancient Mesopotamia was primarily a lawgiver, the ruler in Classical Athens was a representative of the people, the ruler in Achaemenid Persia was expected to be virtuous, and the ruler in Ancient Egypt was primarily a religious figure.
for similar questions on emperor
https://brainly.in/question/2944920
#SPJ11
Read the passage and answer the question.
The Son of Heaven [the emperor] mounts his jade carriage drawn by dragon-like horses, on which is displayed the great standard with the likenesses of the sun and moon upon it, along with dragons ascending and descending. In this the emperor goes to worship the sun outside the east gate.
Give the description of the role of the ruler given in this passage.
(Choice A) Ancient Mesopotamia
(Choice B) Classical Athens
(Choice C) Achaemenid Persia
(Choice D) Ancient Egypt
Answer:
B) Classical Athens
Explanation:
Got it right on Khan Academy
Why do you think Burnett Miller at first believed the wartime propaganda was “an awful lot of baloney?” How did his attitude change later, as the war progressed?
Burnett Miller initially believed the wartime propaganda was "an awful lot of baloney" because he likely had a skeptical attitude towards the information being presented. he might have questioned the accuracy and truthfulness of the messages being conveyed, considering that propaganda often aims to shape public opinion and manipulate perceptions.
as the war progressed, Burnett Miller's attitude likely changed due to several factors:
first-hand experiences: as Miller witnessed the events and realities of the war, he would have encountered situations that contradicted or challenged the propaganda he had previously dismissed. personal experiences, such as witnessing the destruction, loss of lives, or interacting with soldiers and civilians directly affected by the war, could have made him reconsider his initial skepticism.
access to diverse perspectives: over time, Miller might have gained access to alternative sources of information, including news reports, testimonies, or firsthand accounts from soldiers, journalists, or civilians involved in the conflict. this exposure to different viewpoints and narratives would have provided him with a more comprehensive understanding of the situation and potentially countered the simplistic narratives presented in wartime propaganda.
recognition of propaganda tactics: as Miller became more familiar with the strategies employed in propaganda, he might have developed a critical eye and recognized the manipulative techniques used to shape public opinion. this awareness would have allowed him to differentiate between biased propaganda and more reliable sources of information. overall, Burnett Miller's attitude likely evolved as he gained a deeper understanding of the war through direct experiences and exposure to diverse perspectives, leading him to reassess his initial skepticism of wartime propaganda.
The influx of political refugees into the United States and the willingness of the U.S. government to accept these refugees have the greatest impact on which of the following? A. perceived gender and racial inequality B. government funding for social security C. income disparity between the wealthy and poor D. diplomatic relations with other countries
The influx of political refugees into the United States and the willingness of the U.S. government to accept these refugees have the greatest impact on diplomatic relations with other countries
What does The influx of political refugees into the United States and the willingness of the U.S. government to accept these refugees have the greatest impact on?The acceptance of political refugees can have an impact on diplomatic relations with other countries, especially those from which the refugees are fleeing. It can also impact foreign policy and international perceptions of the United States as a nation that values human rights and provides asylum to those in need.
This can affect trade, aid, and other aspects of diplomacy between nations. Additionally, the treatment of refugees can have an impact on the perception of the United States in the international community.
Learn more about political refugees at https://brainly.com/question/4701119
#SPJ1
What was the major impact of the women within the black panther party??
Answer:
Their participation created new political models that encouraged women to be active and public revolutionary figures alongside men.
Explanation:
1. Who was the leader of the Rwandan genocide? What happened to the leader?
2. Why did the Rwandan Genocide happen?
3. After the Cold War, what happened to the Rwandan Genocide?
4. How would you prevent genocide from happening again in the near future?
Answer:1: Juvenal Habyarimana was the leader,Habyarimana's private Falcon 50 jet was shot down near Kigali International Airport, killing Habyarimana.
2:Economic forces. Rwanda was very poor, and in the years just before the genocide it had become poorer
3:Since the genocide, the government adopted a policy of open return and reconciliation for many of the former soldiers who participated in the genocide.
4:By outlawing hate groups and prosecuting hate crimes
Explanation:
Someone who believes the Fed should be abolished might argue that it
Someone who believes the Fed should be abolished might argue that it helps prevent bank failures. Thus, option C is the correct option.
The country's secure, adaptable, and stable monetary and financial system is provided by the Federal Reserve, the country's central bank. The Federal Reserve is the nation's central bank. The Fed offers a number of services that support keeping the economy and banks stable.
Commercial banks are required by the Fed to reserve a certain amount of their deposits. If there are unexpectedly large withdrawals, the bank may be able to access this reserve to help with liquidity. Thus, bank failures are avoided. Thus, one may counter that the Fed helps avoid bank collapses if they think it should be eliminated.
Learn more about Fed here:
https://brainly.com/question/20628585
#SPJ1
Probably the full options are:
A. harmed the financial markets post-September 11th by maintaining their liquidity.
B. supports a currency monopoly and benefits the wealthy over others.
C. helps prevent bank failures.
D. provides important services, such as check processing.
What are 3 other ways suggested to elect a president other than the winner take all electoral college?
The three ways will be:
District electoral vote.
Proportional electoral vote.
National bonus plan.
The automated proposal, which will consequently allocate electoral votes according to each state's present the winner-takes system. The President must receive 270 electoral votes in total to win. One elector for each Republican member of the U.S. House of Representatives. There was also a National bonus plan and the Proportional electoral vote that can be accepted. A senator is the number of individuals who are part of your state's legislative delegations.
Learn more about National bonus, here:
https://brainly.com/question/4486485=
#SPJ1
list 4 actions of seljuk turks that caused the 1st Crusade
Seljuk Turk expansion into Anatolia threatened Byzantine territories, prompting a call for help from the Christian world.The Battle of Manzikert in 1071 led to the Seljuk capture of Byzantine Emperor Romanos IV, weakening Byzantine defenses and stability.The Seljuk Turks' persecution of Christian pilgrims and the closure of key pilgrimage routes, such as Jerusalem, stirred religious fervor among European Christians.The conquest of Antioch by the Seljuk Turks in 1084 alarmed European Christians and intensified their desire to reclaim Christian holy sites in the Holy Land.
Expansion and Threat to Byzantine Empire: The Seljuk Turks' rapid expansion into Anatolia posed a direct threat to the Byzantine Empire, leading to increased tensions and territorial disputes. This expansionist agenda alarmed the Christian world, as the Seljuks encroached upon Byzantine territories.
Battle of Manzikert (1071): The decisive victory of the Seljuk Turks over the Byzantine Empire at the Battle of Manzikert resulted in the capture of Byzantine Emperor Romanos IV. This defeat weakened Byzantine defenses and stability, leaving a power vacuum in the region.
Persecution of Christian Pilgrims: The Seljuk Turks' mistreatment and persecution of Christian pilgrims to the Holy Land, including harassment, looting, and obstruction of pilgrimage routes, deeply angered and offended the European Christian population. Reports of these atrocities spread throughout Europe, fostering a sense of outrage and a desire for intervention.
Conquest of Jerusalem (1071): The Seljuk Turks' conquest of Jerusalem from the Fatimid Caliphate in 1071 raised concerns among European Christians about the fate of their holy sites and the ability to freely access them. The loss of Jerusalem, a significant religious and cultural center, further galvanized Western Christians, fueling the call for a military response to reclaim the Holy Land, culminating in the First Crusade.
For more such question on Turks
https://brainly.com/question/4459098
#SPJ11
William Penn's hope for the Pennsylvania colony was that it would serve as:
A. a beacon for religious freedom and equality.
B. a place where colonists could make their fortunes in gold.
C. a model for a government run by strict religious rules.
D. a supplier of wheat and other crops for the other colonies.
William Penn's hope for the Pennsylvania colony was that it would serve as a beacon for religious freedom and equality. The correct option is a.
William Penn, founder of Pennsylvania and one of the first champions of expressive freedoms in the American colonies, demonstrated how a free society could work and how individuals of different races and religions could live together in liberty and peace.
The principles of freedom that Penn promoted and adopted helped lay the framework for the First Amendment. Thus, William Penn's hope for the Pennsylvania colony was that it would serve as a beacon for religious freedom and equality.
Learn more about Penn, here:
https://brainly.com/question/9493836
#SPJ1
How many fights has muhamad Ali won
According to the information, Ali's record in professional boxing was 56 wins
Who was Muhammad Ali?Muhammad Ali was an American professional boxer who is widely considered one of the greatest boxers of all time. He was born on January 17, 1942 in Kentucky and startedd his professional career in boxing in 1960.
Additionally, Ali's record in professional boxing was 56 wins (including 37 knockouts) and 5 losses. However, his impact on the sport and on society at large went far beyond his record in the ring, as he was also known for his political activism.
Learn more about boxing in: https://brainly.com/question/12456483
#SPJ1
True-False: As a result of the Battle of New Orleans, Andrew Jackson became a war hero and the United States demonstrated that it would fight to preserve its Independence from Great Britain.
Given statment "As a result of the Battle of New Orleans, Andrew Jackson became a war hero and the United States demonstrated that it would fight to preserve its Independence from Great Britain." is true. Because the Battle of New Orleans made Andrew Jackson a war hero and symbolized America's determination to defend its independence.
True. The Battle of New Orleans, which took place in 1815 during the War of 1812, resulted in a decisive victory for the United States under the leadership of General Andrew Jackson.
The battle occurred after the signing of the Treaty of Ghent, which officially ended the war, but news of the treaty had not yet reached the combatants.
The American victory at the Battle of New Orleans boosted national morale and solidified Andrew Jackson's reputation as a war hero. It also demonstrated the United States' determination to defend its independence and territorial integrity against British forces. The battle became a symbol of American resilience and helped shape the nation's identity.
However, it is important to note that the Battle of New Orleans did not directly impact the outcome of the War of 1812 or influence the terms of the Treaty of Ghent.
The treaty had already been negotiated before the battle took place. Nevertheless, the battle's significance in American history as a symbol of patriotism and determination remains true.
For similar question on Battle of New Orleans
https://brainly.com/question/2318911
#SPJ11
The Potawatomi were responsible for:
Select the best answer choice.
A.
Maintaining alliances with neighboring tribes
B.
Guarding the spiritual fires
C.
Maintaining the belief system
D.
None are correct
Answer:
The best answer has to be
A.Maintaining alliances with neighboring tribes
Explanation:
What is the down side of ignoring counter storytelling when studying history
Answer:
Ignoring counter storytelling when studying history can have several downsides:
Bias: Focusing only on one perspective or narrative can lead to a biased understanding of historical events. By ignoring counter storytelling, historians risk perpetuating dominant narratives and excluding marginalized or minority voices from the historical record.
Incomplete picture: Counter storytelling can provide important context and insight into historical events that might otherwise be overlooked or ignored. Without considering diverse perspectives and experiences, historians may miss important aspects of a particular historical period or event.
Missed opportunities for learning: Counter storytelling can challenge assumptions and offer new perspectives on familiar historical narratives. Ignoring these stories can limit our understanding of the complexities of historical events and the diverse experiences of people who lived through them.
Repetition of mistakes: Ignoring counter storytelling can lead to a failure to learn from past mistakes. Without understanding the full context and diverse experiences of historical events, historians may fail to recognize patterns and trends that could inform decision-making in the present.
In conclusion, ignoring counter storytelling when studying history can limit our understanding of the past, perpetuate biases, and impede our ability to learn from historical events. Therefore, it is important for historians to actively seek out diverse perspectives and engage with counter storytelling to gain a more complete and nuanced understanding of historical events.
What two counties still had communist leaders in power after the end of the Cold War
Answer: Russia and North Korea
Explanation:
Answer:
North Korea and Russia, I think China also is one but I don't really know.
Hope this helps :)
Pls brainliest...
What were the major events in turning points of world war two 
The Battle of Stalingrad (1942-1943) : The Soviet Union scored a significant win with this one, which launched their Eastern Front counteroffensive against the Germans.
The Battle of Midway (1942) : The Pacific War's turning point was this naval conflict between the United States and Japan. The US was successful in taking control of the Pacific and destroying a sizable chunk of the Japanese fleet.
The D-Day invasion (1944) : The Allies were able to gain a foothold in Western Europe thanks to this significant Allied invasion of France's Normandy, which ultimately resulted in the defeat of Nazi Germany.
The Battle of Kursk (1943) : This was the largest tank fight in history, and the Soviet Union won it handily on the Eastern Front. As a result, Germany was ultimately defeated on the Eastern Front.
The dropping of atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki (1945) : This was a controversial decision by the United States, but it ultimately led to Japan's surrender and the end of World War II.
What realization did China and Japan share following the Dino Japanese war
Answer:
The Second Sino-Japanese War, also known as the War of Resistance Against Japan, was a brutal and devastating conflict that lasted from 1937 to 1945. Following the war, both China and Japan realized the enormous toll that the conflict had taken on their countries and their people. Japan, which had been severely weakened by the war, experienced widespread destruction and loss of life, and was forced to cede all of its territorial gains in China, as well as other territories in the Pacific.
China, on the other hand, emerged from the war as a major military and political power, having successfully fought off a much larger and better-equipped enemy. The war also brought about a greater sense of unity and nationalism among the Chinese people, who had rallied together to fight a common enemy. Overall, the realization that war brought destruction and suffering to both sides contributed to a renewed effort to avoid future conflicts between China and Japan.
Explanation:
From The Movie The Green Berets
In the initial part of the movie, there was a demonstration of the capabilities of the Green Berets. Explain the discussion between those who support the military and those who were against the war.
In the initial part of the movie "The Green Berets," there is a discussion between those who support the military and those who are against the war. Supporters highlight the need for military intervention to protect freedom, while opponents argue against the war, emphasizing the loss of life and the questionable motives behind it.
In the initial part of the movie "The Green Berets," a demonstration of the Green Berets' capabilities sparks a discussion between those who support the military and those who are against the war. The supporters emphasize the importance of military intervention in preserving freedom and democracy, viewing the Green Berets as patriotic heroes defending their country. They argue that the war is necessary to prevent the spread of communism and protect American interests abroad.
On the other hand, the opponents of the war raise concerns about the loss of life and question the motives behind the conflict. They criticize the government's decision to send troops to a foreign land, arguing that it is an unnecessary and unjustified war. They express skepticism about the effectiveness of military intervention and highlight the potential for civilian casualties and long-lasting consequences.
The discussion between these two sides reflects the broader societal debates and divisions surrounding the Vietnam War during the era in which the movie was released. It presents contrasting viewpoints on the use of military force and raises moral and political questions about the nature of warfare and its consequences.
For such more question on protect freedom
https://brainly.com/question/19131523
#SPJ11
Which of the following belongs in the empty box below?
President Eisenhower backs the
Shah of Iran in an effort to
prevent communist powers
from obtaining Iranian oil
supplies
Shah of Iran flees from
the Ayatollah Khomeini
to the U.S.
O America boycotts OPEC and begins drilling for oil in Gulf of Mexico
O Iranian students storm U.S. embassy in Tehran, taking 52 American hostages
President Carter deports the Shah back to Iranian officials
OPEC cuts off U.S. oil supplies, leading to high gas prices
The event that belongs in the empty box is the 1953 CIA led coup that ousted Iran's democratically elected prime minister Mohammad Mossadegh, who had nationalized Iran's oil industry, and restored power to the pro-Western shah, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi.
The CIA coup in IranThe 1953 covert operation by the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) of the United States to remove Iran's democratically elected Prime Minister, Mohammad Mossadegh, and reinstate the pro-Western Shah of Iran, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, was known as the CIA coup in Iran.
The CIA collaborated with the British intelligence service MI6 to arm and train Iranian agents for the coup as well as to run propaganda efforts against Mossadegh's regime. An organized military and political campaign that was the culmination of the operation was successful in toppling Mossadegh's administration and restoring the Shah to power.
The CIA coup in Iran remains a controversial and sensitive topic in Iranian and international relations to this day.
Learn more on the CIA coup here https://brainly.com/question/932408
#SPJ1
The complete question is:
Which of the following belongs in the empty box below?
President Eisenhower backs the
Shah of Iran in an effort to
prevent communist powers
from obtaining Iranian oil
supplies
Shah of Iran flees from
the Ayatollah Khomeini
to the U.S.
O America boycotts OPEC and begins drilling for oil in Gulf of Mexico
O Iranian students storm U.S. embassy in Tehran, taking 52 American hostages
President Carter deports the Shah back to Iranian officials
OPEC cuts off U.S. oil supplies, leading to high gas prices
Please give answer now.
After-effect of apartheid still visible be your village,location or town today
Answer:
What are the strategies in developing learners speaking skill
What is the most effective method for changing society—voting, challenges in the courts, nonviolent civil disobedience, or violence?
Answer:
The most effective method for changing society would be through show of force, which is using a violent tactic.
Explanation:
The question is not asking about whether or not a method is effective in the long-term, nor is there a checklist of the requirements that should be met in changing society. Society as a whole effectively changes through violence, regardless if the said violence is in the spotlight or not.
An really great example of violent tactics being the force that changed the trajectory of US public in relations to racial tensions is the black panthers, who believed that nonviolent protests are not as effective, and that both the defense of the African American's personal lives and their liberties through aggression was called for to sustain equal rights. The violence of the Black Panthers, in that case, drew many to support more moderate forms of protests for equal rights, such as the protest under Martin Luther King Jr.
Whether or not the methodology of violence is effective directly or indirectly, they have been used to create change, or even dismantle current systems. While the Black Panthers may be seen as a way in which violence indirectly helped peaceful causes to gain the common goal of equality, there examples in which violence can directly change the trajectory of society.
A good example of a direct violent change is the Vietnam War, in which the unpopular South Vietnamese government under Ngo Dinh Diem, caused a war to break out in which rebels (known as Viet Congs), aided by North Vietnamese (North Vietnamese Army), rebelled and removed the Diem government after the United States pulled out of the war due to public outcry and protests. Through violence, the Communists were able to reunite the country and provide their free reign of terror on their citizens through Bamboo Gulags, which were essentially reeducation as well as extermination camps. This method was extremely effective in cracking down on dissent and keeping the country aligned with communist values.
Of course, this is extremely dependent on the culture and nation that is being addressed, but if all other methods of changing society fails, violence is the last resort in most cases, to impose the winners will on all. As the last resort, it will also mean that it is the most effective in producing the results that are required in most cases.
Learn more about how society changes, here:
https://brainly.com/question/9072369
opinion on gun control
Opinion: I believe that we have a right to own Guns. The second amendment of the Constitution says "... the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." I believe that in many cases, these awful things that happen with guns are because a gun got into the wrong hands. Most of the time they get into the wrong hands Illegally The U.S Government is trying to say that guns are bad and they ki.ll people. It's really the person holding the gun. The gun doesn't shoot without someone pulling the trigger. One example is when someone crashes into another car, it's not the fault of the vehicle, it's the fault of the driver operating the car.
A problem that our society has now is that a lot of people use violence to settle problems and it's sad. Another problem is that a lot of criminals do trades for stolen guns.
What are the 2 main duties of the Vice President?
Answer:
the vice president has the sole power to break a tie vote in the Senate and formally presides over the receiving and counting of electoral ballots cast in presidential elections
Explanation:
how did civil rights movement come to an existence
Answer: After the American Civil War and the subsequent abolition of slavery in the 1860s, the Reconstruction Amendments to the United States Constitution granted emancipation and constitutional rights of citizenship to all African Americans, most of whom had recently been enslaved.
Explanation:
Answer: The civil rights movement come to an existence because civil rights movement was a nonviolent social movement and campaign from 1954 to 1968 in the United States to abolish legalized racial segregation, discrimination, and disenfranchisement throughout the United States. The movement had its origins in the Reconstruction era during the late 19th century, although it made its largest legislative gains in the 1960s after years of direct actions and grassroots protests. The social movement's major nonviolent resistance and civil disobedience campaigns eventually secured new protections in federal law for the civil rights of all Americans.
Explanation:
In the document "Pat Buchanan on the Culture War (1992), he claimed that Bill Clinton's election would lead to the election of Clinton and Clinton . Quote " The agenda that Clinton & Clinton would impose on America : Anaphora . That's change , all right. But that's not the kind of change America needs . It's not the kind of change America wants . And it's not the kind of change we can abide in a nation we still call "God's country . "
Overall, this quote from Pat Buchanan's document "Pat Buchanan on the Culture War (1992)" suggests that he was strongly opposed to the Clintons and believed that their election would bring about negative changes to the country.
What is the loses of change?
This quote suggests that Pat Buchanan believed that Bill Clinton's election, and the subsequent election of his wife Hillary Clinton, would bring about significant and undesirable changes to America. The use of anaphora, or the repetition of the word "change," emphasizes his point and suggests that he believed these changes would be harmful to the country.
Buchanan's statement implies that the changes proposed by the Clintons would be against the values and beliefs of many Americans, as he refers to the United States as "God's country." He suggests that the changes would be unwelcome and not in line with the desires of the American people.
Bill Clinton defeated in the 1992 presidential election.
An economist's eight-year-old son gave his parents the following utility tables and then told them that he would like Santa to give him presents that have the maximum possible marginal utility per dollar. Santa has a budget of $60 per child. If action figures cost Santa $10 to produce and squirt guns cost Santa $15 to produce, what presents should Santa deliver this year?
-Santa should deliver three action figures and two squirt guns.
-Santa should deliver four squirt guns.
-Santa should deliver six action figures. -Santa should deliver four action figures and one squirt gun.
The presents that Santa should give are A. Santa should deliver three action figures and two squirt guns.
Why should Santa deliver these presents ?Santa should make the number of presents such that the marginal utility is rising and not falling. Or rather, at the quantity where the marginal utility for both the action figures and the squirt guns are the same.
The marginal utility that is the same for squirt guns and action figures is 40 and this quantity corresponds to 3 Action Figures and 2 Squirt Guns so this is the quantity that Santa should produce.
Find out more on marginal utility at https://brainly.com/question/13616701
#SPJ1
