European colonists in North America did not demonstrate several aspects of "baseline communism" to Indigenous people, which caused confusion. These aspects include financial loans, assistance when drowning, help and guidance, and food and shelter.
European colonists in North America did not exhibit the principles of "baseline communism" to Indigenous people, leading to confusion and disputes. Firstly, they did not provide, which were a common feature of baseline communism where resources were shared for the collective good. Instead, colonists introduced a system of private property and capitalism, which prioritized individual ownership and profit-making.
Secondly, colonists did not consistently offer assistance when drowning, which could be seen as a lack of communal care and support. In baseline communism, community members would come together to help those in need, emphasizing the collective responsibility for well-being.
Thirdly, the colonists did not provide extensive help and guidance to Indigenous people. Baseline communism typically involves communal decision-making and shared knowledge, but colonists often imposed their own cultural practices and disregarded Indigenous ways of life, resulting in a lack of understanding and communication.
Finally, the colonists did not consistently provide food and shelter to Indigenous communities. In baseline communism, resources would be shared to ensure everyone's basic needs were met. However, the colonists often seized Indigenous lands and resources, leading to displacement, loss of livelihoods, and scarcity for Indigenous populations.
Learn more about European colonists here:
https://brainly.com/question/4914583
#SPJ11
through unemployment during the great depression was widespread, it was higher in some parts of the united states than in others. An economic historian creates a table based on existing unemployment data from the depression, while a cultural historian interviews people who were unemployed at the time. What information would the cultural historian receive that the economic historian would not?
Answer:
The cultural historian who interviews people who were unemployed during the Great Depression would receive information that the economic historian, who creates a table based on existing unemployment data, would not have access to.
The economic historian's table would provide statistical data, such as the percentage of the population that was unemployed in different regions of the country. This data would be useful for understanding the scale and scope of the unemployment crisis during the Great Depression.
However, the cultural historian's interviews with people who were unemployed at the time would provide a more personal and subjective perspective on the experience of unemployment. The cultural historian would be able to gather firsthand accounts of the emotional and psychological impact of unemployment on individuals and families, as well as the ways in which people coped with the challenges of being out of work during this difficult time.
The cultural historian would also be able to gather information about the social and cultural factors that influenced the experience of unemployment, such as the stigma attached to being out of work or the ways in which race, gender, and class affected access to employment opportunities.
Overall, the cultural historian's interviews would provide a more nuanced and personal understanding of the experience of unemployment during the Great Depression, which would complement the statistical data provided by the economic historian's table.
which one of the beatles attempts at keeping the band together during their final years were seen as controlling by the other three?
Answer:
The Beatle who attempted to keep the band together during their final years, in a way that was seen as controlling by the other three, was John Lennon.
As the band's relationship became more strained in 1969, John initially tried to keep the Beatles functioning as a creative and recording unit. However, his attempts such as insisting they record together at his home studio in Tittenhurst Park were viewed by Paul, George and Ringo as overly domineering and bossy. They felt John was losing touch with the other members' creative needs and interests.
John's forceful personality and tendency towards control also began to alienate the other Beatles, especially Paul. There were tensions over John taking over more of the songwriting and making unilateral decisions for the band without proper consultation or compromise.
By early 1970, the other Beatles had become increasingly unwilling to acquiesce to John's wishes. They resisted recording the way John wanted and pushed for more autonomy in the studio. This further exacerbated the fractures within the band.
So in summary, while John Lennon's initial attempts to keep the Beatles together in their later years came from a place of passion for the band, his domineering and controlling manner ultimately contributed further to the widening rift among members and pushed them towards breakup. The other Beatles grew weary of acquiescing to John's wishes and desired more equality and compromise.
Hope this provides a helpful overview! Let me know if you have any other questions.
Paul McCartney's attempts to keep the band together during their final years were seen as controlling by the other three Beatles.
Explanation:In the final years of the Beatles, Paul McCartney's attempts at keeping the band together were seen as controlling by the other three band members.
One example of this was when McCartney wanted to have an outside producer, Phil Spector, work on the Let It Be album without consulting the other members. This decision resulted in tension within the band and contributed to their eventual breakup.
The controlling behavior by McCartney was perceived as a way of exerting his influence and asserting his vision for the band, which led to conflicts with John Lennon, George Harrison, and Ringo Starr.
Learn more about Controlling behavior in the Beatles here:https://brainly.com/question/32790392
#SPJ
Explain the role of Germany’s unrestricted submarine warfare and the sinking of the RMS Lusitania on America’s entry into the war.
Answer:
Germany's unrestricted submarine warfare and the sinking of the RMS Lusitania were major factors that led to the United States' entry into World War I.
In early 1915, Germany began a policy of unrestricted submarine warfare, which meant that German submarines would attack any ships, including neutral ones, that entered designated war zones around the British Isles. The policy was intended to cut off Britain's supply lines and force it to surrender. However, the policy also resulted in the sinking of many American ships, which outraged the American public and led to calls for the U.S. to take action.
The sinking of the RMS Lusitania was a particularly significant event. The Lusitania was a British passenger liner that was travelling from New York to Liverpool in May 1915. The ship was carrying American passengers and was not armed, but it was carrying munitions and other military supplies. A German U-boat torpedoed the ship, causing it to sink and killing 1,198 people, including 128 Americans.
The sinking of the Lusitania outraged the American public and sparked widespread calls for the U.S. to enter the war. President Woodrow Wilson initially resisted these calls, but the sinking of several more American ships, including the Sussex in 1916, further inflamed public opinion and eventually led Wilson to declare war on Germany in April 1917.
Overall, Germany's unrestricted submarine warfare and the sinking of the Lusitania were major factors that led to the United States' entry into World War I. These events outraged the American public and convinced President Wilson and other leaders that the U.S. needed to take action to protect its interests and its citizens.
Why were many people weary of war during the Vietnam War era? America had fought in three wars since the beginning of the 20th century, and many people did not see the rationale for getting involved in Vietnam. America had fought in two wars since the beginning of the 20th century, and most people wanted to focus on improving civil rights for African Americans instead. The Cold War with the Soviet Union convinced many people that fighting in combat was both unnecessary and a waste of lives. The civil rights demonstrations of the 50s and 60s caused many people to lose interest in foreign affairs as they focused on protecting their families and possessions.
Answer:
Many people were weary of war during the Vietnam War era because America had fought in three wars since the beginning of the 20th century, and many people did not see the rationale for getting involved in Vietnam.
The United States had been involved in World War I, World War II, and the Korean War, and many Americans were tired of the human and economic costs of war. Additionally, the Vietnam War was controversial from the outset, with many people questioning the government's rationale for getting involved in the conflict and the morality of the war itself. As the war dragged on and the human toll mounted, opposition to the war grew, and many people became disillusioned with the government and with American foreign policy more broadly. The anti-war movement became a major force in American politics, and it played a significant role in ending the war and shaping public opinion on military intervention in the decades that followed.
The implications of the Civil Rights Movement include all EXCEPT
- racist practices and policies ending long before the 1960s Civil Rights Movement
- call for the end of sterilization of Black, Indian, and Mexican women
- demand the end of Euro-centric curriculum
- end of legal racist practices and policies
The implications of the Civil Rights Movement include all except the call for the end of sterilization of Black, Indian, and Mexican women. Thus, option B is correct.
The civil rights movement is the result of more than 400 years of American history, during which the social, economic, and political advancement of the country was largely influenced by slavery, racism, white supremacy, and discrimination.
Despite a constitution that initially tolerated slavery and only counted those who were enslaved as three-fifths of the country's free population, the pursuit of civil rights for Black Americans was also motivated by the traditional promise of American democracy and by the Declaration of Independence's assumption of everyone's equality and unalienable right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
Learn more about the civil rights movement here:
https://brainly.com/question/32042116
#SPJ4
which of the following, when elected to the u.s. senate in 1961 rejuvenated the republican party in texas? a. john tower b. phil gramm c. john cornyn d. kay bailey hutchinson e. ted cruz
Answer:
The answer is A. John Tower.
John Tower was elected to the U.S. Senate in 1961, becoming the first Republican senator elected in Texas since Reconstruction. His election marked a significant shift in Texas politics, as the state had been dominated by the Democratic Party for decades. Tower's success in the election helped to rejuvenate the Republican Party in Texas, paving the way for future Republican victories in the state.
During Moses’ call account(s) (Exod 3:1-4:30), who does God
determine will be Moses’ substitute or mouthpiece?
God determines that Aaron will be Moses' substitute or mouthpiece during Moses' call account(s) in Exodus 3:1-4:30.
In Exodus 3:1-4:30, when Moses encounters God at the burning bush and receives his call to lead the Israelites out of Egypt, he expresses concerns about his ability to speak persuasively. Moses tells God that he is not eloquent and asks God to send someone else in his place.
In response, God assures Moses that He will be with his mouth and teach him what to say. However, recognizing Moses' reluctance and his need for assistance, God appoints Moses' brother, Aaron, as his spokesperson. God tells Moses that Aaron will speak to the people on his behalf, acting as his mouthpiece. This arrangement ensures effective communication between Moses and the Israelites during their liberation from Egypt.
To know more about Exodus, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/29760666
#SPJ4
which idea from the excerpt reflects the founding fathers concerns with having a government with too much power
Answer:
Without a specific excerpt to reference, it is difficult to determine exactly what idea is being referred to. However, the founding fathers of the United States were deeply concerned with the issue of government power and the potential for tyranny.
Many of the founding fathers, such as Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, and John Adams, believed that a strong central government was necessary to maintain order and protect the common good. However, they also recognized that too much power in the hands of the government could lead to corruption, oppression, and the violation of individual rights.
To address this concern, the founding fathers designed a system of government with a series of checks and balances, in which power was divided between different branches of government and between the federal government and the states. This system was intended to prevent any one individual or group from gaining too much power and becoming a threat to individual liberty.
Overall, the founding fathers were deeply concerned with the issue of government power and worked to design a system of government that would limit that power and protect individual rights.
the brutal attack by law enforcement officers against peaceful demonstrators in selma, alabama, became known as
What was the result of the French Revolution
Answer:
The French Revolution, which lasted from 1789 to 1799, had a profound impact on French society and the world at large. Some of the major results of the French Revolution include:
1. The end of the Bourbon monarchy: The French Revolution resulted in the overthrow of the Bourbon monarchy and the establishment of the First French Republic in 1792.
2. The Reign of Terror: During the Revolution, a period of violent political repression known as the Reign of Terror occurred, resulting in the execution of thousands of people, including King Louis XVI and his wife, Marie Antoinette.
3. The rise of Napoleon Bonaparte: The French Revolution paved the way for Napoleon Bonaparte, a military general who rose to power in the aftermath of the Revolution and eventually became Emperor of France.
4. The spread of revolutionary ideas: The French Revolution inspired similar movements for independence and democracy throughout Europe and the world, including in Latin America and the United States.
5. The establishment of a new political order: The French Revolution resulted in the adoption of a new constitution and the creation of a new political order that emphasized equality, liberty, and fraternity as core values.
Overall, the French Revolution marked a major turning point in European history, leading to significant political, social, and cultural changes that continued to shape the world in the centuries that followed.
Answer:
There is the French Revolution of 1789, which brought down the Monarchy and the ancien régime — and resulted in the beheading of King Louis XVI and his famous wife, Marie Antoinette. The Revolution lasted until 1792 at which point the National Assembly abolished the monarchy and declared the First Republic (1792-1799.)
What was the most important way the transatlantic slave trade affected African nations? OA. Entire villages disappeared because so many members were captured and sold as slaves. B. African leaders were often not able to negotiate treaties with European traders. OC. African nations were so interested in trade that they did not grow enough crops to survive. D. Many Africans became sick as they came into contact with diseases that European traders had.
Answer:
Entire villages disappeared because so many members were captured and sold as slaves.
Explanation:
The most important way the transatlantic slave trade affected African nations was that entire villages disappeared because so many members were captured and sold as slaves. This massive forced removal of people from their communities and homelands had devastating consequences for African societies. The slave trade disrupted social structures, families were torn apart, and communities were destabilized as a significant portion of their population was taken away. The loss of a large number of individuals resulted in a severe demographic impact, leading to depopulation and the disappearance of entire villages. This disruption and loss of human capital had long-lasting and profound effects on African nations.
Hi, I'm writing a book summary on Michael Roberto's book, on Why great leaders don't take yes for an answer: Managing for conflict and consensus. Can you please help me ans this question as I need to write about it and extrapolate from other authors as well,
1-Convergence and Divergence within the book.
Thank you.
In Michael Roberto's book, "Why Great Leaders Don't Take Yes for an Answer: Managing for Conflict and Consensus," the concepts of convergence and divergence play essential roles in understanding effective leadership and decision-making processes.
Convergence refers to the process of finding common ground and reaching agreement among team members or stakeholders. It involves bringing diverse perspectives and opinions together to work towards a shared goal or solution.
The divergence highlights the significance of exploring different viewpoints and encouraging dissent. It involves allowing for healthy disagreement and debate among team members to uncover new ideas, challenge assumptions, and avoid groupthink.
Roberto's book stresses the delicate balance between convergence and divergence. While convergence is essential for reaching consensus and moving forward, divergence is necessary for effective problem-solving and decision-making.
Learn more about Michael Roberto's book here:
https://brainly.com/question/32736118
#SPJ4
In some rare cases with controversial bills, committee members will __________ because they fear any bad publicity that their suggestions or views on the bill could generate. A. refuse to read the bill B. not make a recommendation C. recommend quick passage of the bill D. recommend a televised debate on the bill
In some rare cases with controversial bills, committee members will not make a recommendation cause they fear any bad publicity that their suggestions or views on the bill could generate. So, option B is the right choice.
In some rare cases with controversial bills, committee members may choose option B: not make a recommendation because they fear the potential negative publicity that their suggestions or views on the bill could generate.
Committee members are responsible for reviewing and evaluating proposed bills.When faced with a controversial bill, committee members may anticipate public backlash or criticism due to the sensitive nature of the bill.To avoid any negative publicity or potential backlash, committee members may opt not to make a recommendation on the bill.By refraining from taking a stance or offering a recommendation, committee members can avoid being associated with a potentially contentious or unpopular decision.This approach allows them to protect their public image and avoid potential repercussions from their constituents or interest groups.By not making a recommendation, committee members can effectively distance themselves from the controversial aspects of the bill and minimize the risk of facing public scrutiny or backlash.Overall, committee members may choose not to make a recommendation on a controversial bill out of fear of generating negative publicity and its potential consequences.
The right answer is option B. not make a recommendation
For more such question on committee
https://brainly.com/question/12013157
#SPJ8
Line graph showing British trade with China in millions of pounds from 1815 to 1845. Exports to China go from 6 million pounds in 1815 to 10 million pounds in 1845. Imports from China go from 13 million pounds in 1815 to 17 million pounds in 1845.
In 1839, the British became more imperialistic in China by declaring war and forcing the Chinese to sign trade agreements.
What was the effect of this action?
Imports increased, but exports declined.
Exports increased, but imports declined.
Both imports and exports declined.
Both imports and exports increased.
Answer:
The effect of the British declaring war and forcing China to sign trade agreements in 1839 was:
Both imports and exports increased.
Based on the line graph showing British trade with China from 1815 to 1845, we see:
- Exports to China (things Britain sold to China) increased from 6 million pounds in 1815 to 10 million pounds in 1845.
- Imports from China (things Britain bought from China) increased from 13 million pounds in 1815 to 17 million pounds in 1845.
So after the British became more Imperialistic and aggressive in China in 1839 by declaring war and imposing trade agreements, both British exports to China and imports from China continued to increase. This suggests the intervention and forced trade agreements opened up more trade opportunities that benefited both sides.
Question of 29 Why do historians identify certain historical events as turning points?
Historians identify certain historical events as turning points because they mark significant shifts or changes in the course of history, shaping societies, cultures, politics, and economies in profound ways.
Historians identify certain historical events as turning points because they represent pivotal moments that significantly alter the trajectory of history.
Significance: Turning points are events that have a profound impact on societies, cultures, politics, or economies. They often bring about transformative changes that shape the course of history.Shift in Direction: These events mark a shift in the prevailing narrative or direction of a particular era or period. They introduce new ideas, ideologies, technologies, or social movements that reshape the status quo.Consequences: Turning points have far-reaching consequences that extend beyond the immediate time and place of the event. They can lead to long-term societal, political, or economic transformations, and their effects can be felt for generations.Historical Interpretation: Historians identify turning points through careful analysis and evaluation of primary and secondary sources. They consider the context, impact, and legacy of the event to determine its significance.Narrative Framing: Recognizing turning points helps historians construct a coherent narrative of history, highlighting key moments where change occurred and emphasizing their importance in understanding the broader historical landscape.Overall, identifying turning points allows historians to discern patterns, understand causality, and provide insights into the complex and dynamic nature of human history.
For more such question on Historians
https://brainly.com/question/24466312
#SPJ8
what did the anglo-russian entente resolve? responses access rights to the suez canal access rights to the suez canal boundary disputes in persia boundary disputes in persia debates over rights to oil in iraq debates over rights to oil in iraq trade disagreements in china
The Anglo-Russian Entente resolved boundary disputes in Persia.
The Anglo-Russian Entente, signed in 1907, was an agreement between the United Kingdom and the Russian Empire. One of the key issues addressed by the entente was the resolution of boundary disputes in Persia (now Iran). The agreement established spheres of influence in Persia, dividing the country into three zones: a northern zone under Russian influence, a southern zone under British influence, and a neutral central zone.
This division aimed to maintain stability and prevent conflict between the two powers in Persia. The entente also reaffirmed the importance of preserving the territorial integrity and political independence of Persia. While the Anglo-Russian Entente had significant geopolitical implications, such as the balance of power in Central Asia, it specifically focused on resolving boundary disputes in Persia.
To know more about Anglo-Russian, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/29579042
#SPJ4
------------The given question is incomplete, the complete question is:
"What did the Anglo-Russian entente resolve?
access rights to the Suez canal
boundary disputes in Persia
debates over rights to oil in Iraq
trade disagreements in China"---------------
the reasons why Hippocrates and galens ideas lasted for so long
Answer: HIPPOCRATES ARE DIFFRENT
Explanation:YOUR MOM
Why did the colonies resist Britain’s attempts to reorganize its
North American colonial empire?
The colonies resisted Britain's attempts to reorganize its North American colonial empire primarily due to the following reasons: taxation without representation, limitations on self-governance, and perceived infringement on individual rights.
The colonies opposed Britain's efforts because they believed that taxation without representation violated their rights as English subjects. Measures like the Stamp Act, Townsend Acts, and the Tea Act imposed taxes on the colonists without their consent, leading to widespread protests and resistance. Additionally, the colonies resented the imposition of stricter British control through acts like the Intolerable Acts, which limited self-governance and established military rule in response to colonial unrest.
These actions were seen as undermining the rights and freedoms that the colonists believed they were entitled to as British subjects. The resistance to British reorganization reflected a desire for greater autonomy, representation, and the preservation of their individual rights and liberties.
To know more about colonies , click here.
https://brainly.com/question/20463235
#SPJ4
match the pairs with each title
Title
Money exchanged for illegal alcohol
was unregulated by the government.
Some people drank too much alcohol
and abused their family members.
Police officers and politicians were
corrupted by gangster activity.
People rebelled and produced and
consumed alcohol in excess.
Pairs
to provide income tax
to decrease crime
to establish temperance
to reestablish morals
Answer:
Yes, that is correct. Barack Obama was able to win several key swing states that had previously voted for George W. Bush, including Florida, Ohio, and Virginia. In addition, he was able to win a number of other states that had traditionally voted for the Republican Party, such as Indiana and North Carolina. By winning these key swing states and expanding the Democratic Party's electoral base, Obama was able to secure a significant victory in the 2008 presidential election.
Explanation:
edmentum
has any musician become a politician?
Answer:
Yes
Explanation: Clay Aiken is a musician he is running for Congress of north carolina for the second time (its also his hometown)
My assignment is asking about the book Animal Farm, Chapter 1, and it says, "Please define the current governmental system on the farm. Consider who has power and how to maintain it." Please help me.
Answer:
Sure, I can help you with that.
In Chapter 1 of Animal Farm, the governmental system on the farm is a direct democracy. This means that all of the animals have an equal say in how the farm is run. The animals meet together to discuss important issues, and they vote on how to resolve them. The pigs are the most intelligent animals on the farm, so they often take on leadership roles. However, they are not allowed to have more power than any other animal.
The current governmental system on the farm is maintained by the animals' commitment to the principles of Animalism. Animalism is a set of beliefs that was created by Old Major, a wise old pig. The principles of Animalism include the following:
* All animals are equal.
* No animal shall sleep in a bed.
* No animal shall drink alcohol.
* No animal shall kill another animal.
* All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others.
The last principle is often interpreted as a warning against the dangers of power. It suggests that even in a system of direct democracy, there is always the potential for some animals to gain more power than others.
The governmental system on the farm is still in its early stages, and it is not yet clear how it will develop in the future. However, the principles of Animalism provide a foundation for a just and equitable society.
Here are some additional details about the governmental system on the farm:
* The animals hold regular meetings to discuss important issues.
* The animals vote on how to resolve issues.
* The pigs are often the leaders in these meetings, but they are not allowed to have more power than any other animal.
* The animals are committed to the principles of Animalism, which include the belief that all animals are equal.
Explanation:
Please mark me as Brainliest
What type of pollution does the company create when it clears out a force?
A. Air
B. Water
C. Land
D. Underground
Answer:
C. Land.
Explanation:
When a company clears out a forest, it primarily contributes to land pollution. The removal of trees and vegetation from an area can lead to soil erosion, loss of biodiversity, and disruption of ecosystems. Additionally, the clearing process may involve the use of heavy machinery and the generation of construction waste, further impacting the land. While there can be indirect impacts on air and water quality due to deforestation, the immediate and direct pollution associated with clearing a forest is primarily related to land pollution. Therefore, the correct answer is C. Land.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
Vehicle emissions, fuel oils and natural gas to heat homes, by-products of manufacturing and power generation, particularly coal-fueled power plants, and fumes from chemical products are the primary sources of human-made air pollution.
What act of U.S. expansion was the direct result of Matthew Perry’s naval journey to Japan?
Matthew Perry's naval journey to Japan directly resulted in the signing of the Treaty of Kanagawa, which opened Japan to U.S. expansion and initiated a new era of international engagement for Japan.
The direct result of Matthew Perry's naval journey to Japan was the signing of the Treaty of Kanagawa in 1854. This treaty marked a significant act of U.S. expansion and opened the door to increased trade and diplomatic relations between the United States and Japan.Perry's naval expedition was aimed at forcibly opening Japan to foreign trade, specifically to secure provisions and facilities for American ships. His display of military power and modern technology convinced the Japanese government to negotiate. The Treaty of Kanagawa, signed between the United States and Japan, allowed American ships to enter Japanese ports, established consular relations, and provided for the safety and protection of American sailors and shipwrecked personnel.This act of U.S. expansion not only facilitated trade and diplomatic ties between the two countries but also had far-reaching consequences. It encouraged other Western powers to pursue similar treaties with Japan, leading to the end of Japan's policy of isolation and setting the stage for Japan's rapid modernization and transformation into a major world power. Matthew Perry's naval journey to Japan directly resulted in the signing of the Treaty of Kanagawa, which opened Japan to U.S. expansion and initiated a new era of international engagement for Japan.For more such questions on Japan
https://brainly.com/question/510537
#SPJ8
An imperialist country using indirect rule in an African colony would most likely enact which policy? A. Outlawing local religions and forcing conquered people to conver to Christianity B. Allowing a local governor to oversee the construction of new infrastructure C. Offering equal treatment to all colonial citizens regardless of ethnicity D. Removing all non-European officials from positions of authority
An imperialist country using indirect rule in an African colony would most likely enact policy option B. which involves allowing a local governor to oversee the construction of new infrastructure.
Indirect rule is a method of colonial administration where the imperial power delegates authority to local indigenous leaders or institutions. This approach aims to maintain the existing social and political structures within the colony while exerting indirect control and influence.
By allowing a local governor to oversee infrastructure construction, the imperialist country demonstrates a willingness to utilize existing indigenous systems and institutions. This approach can serve multiple purposes. First, it helps maintain stability and continuity by preserving local governance structures and power dynamics.
Second, it fosters a sense of legitimacy and acceptance among the local population, as they see their own leaders playing a role in the development and improvement of their communities. The indirect rule also provides certain benefits to the imperial power. It allows for a more cost-effective method of administration, as local leaders can handle day-to-day governance, reducing the need for a large imperial bureaucracy.
It can also serve as a means of co-optation, whereby the indigenous elite becomes collaborators with the colonial power, helping to maintain control and stability. While the indirect rule may involve some degree of cultural and religious influence, such as the introduction of Christian missionaries or education, it typically aims to preserve local customs and traditions to a certain extent. Therefore, the correct answer is option B.
know more about infrastructure here:
https://brainly.com/question/869476
#SPJ8
Throughout European history, Jewish people were forced to live in segregated communities called .
Answer: Ghettos
Explanation:
Jews were sanctioned off into segregated neighborhoods known as ghettos
Residents of utopian communities were attempting to achieve a state of
Contrast the characters in the story. Tell what pandora and Epi do and say that show how they are different
Pandora's cautiousness contrasts with Epi's impulsiveness, evident in their actions and dialogue in the story Pandora's Box.
In the story of Pandora's Box, the characters Pandora and Epi demonstrate their differences through their actions and dialogue.Pandora is depicted as a curious and cautious character. Her actions showcase her curiosity as she is tempted to open the box despite being warned about its consequences. However, she hesitates and questions the decision, showing her cautious nature. In her dialogue, Pandora expresses her concerns and seeks reassurance from others, reflecting her thoughtful and careful approach to situations.On the other hand, Epi is portrayed as a mischievous and impulsive character. His actions exhibit his impulsiveness as he encourages Pandora to open the box, disregarding the potential consequences. Epi's dialogue is filled with excitement and a desire for adventure, emphasizing his impulsive nature and willingness to take risks.Through their contrasting actions and dialogue, Pandora and Epi highlight their different personalities and approaches to the situation. Pandora's cautiousness and reluctance contrast with Epi's impulsive and adventurous nature, creating tension and conflict in the story.The complete question should be In the story pandora box , how do the characters Pandora and Epi demonstrate their differences through their actions and dialogueFor more questions on Pandora's Box
https://brainly.com/question/26493831
#SPJ8
How did the Civil War affect the economy of the North?
A. The Northern economy grew as factories produced large amounts
of goods for the war.
B. The Northern economy shrank as foreign countries refused to
trade with the Union.
C. The Northern economy stayed the same as no new jobs were
created during the war.
D. The Northern economy shrank as the Union was unable to trade
with the Confederacy.
Where did the last president go for an informal Native American inauguration? a. Titicaca b. Tihuanaco c. Sucre d. Santa Cruz
Answer:
The correct answer is option B, Tihuanaco
Explanation:
President Evo Morales had an informal inauguration and took the oath in an important ancestral and archeological place called Tiwanaku, next to a large and beautiful lake 12,500 feet above sea level.
Which of the following best describes how the colonies justified seeking independence?
Answer:
Colonial taxes imposed by the British were too high.
Explanation:
