What does feel obligated to mean?.

New York Times Co. v. Sullivan was the case in which the U.S. Supreme Court determined that proof of malice was a prerequisite for a libel conviction.

A significant U.S. Supreme Court case, New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964), held that the First Amendment's freedom of expression safeguards restrict the capacity of American public officials to bring libel lawsuits. According to the ruling, if the plaintiff in a defamation suit is a public official or contender for public office, they must also demonstrate that the claim was made with "actual malice," which means that the defendant either knew the claim was incorrect or carelessly disregarded whether it could be false, in addition to the usual elements of defamation, such as the publishing of an untrue defamation claim to a third party.

To know more about New York Times Co. v. Sullivan:

https://brainly.com/question/1233137

#SPJ4

Commission means a figure paid to an agent or hand for transacting a piece of business or performing a service.

Commission is a sum of plutocrat paid to a salesman for every trade that he or shemakes.However, the quantum they admit depends on the quantum they vend, If a salesman is paid on commission. The salesmen work on commission only.

Commissions are a form of variable- pay remuneration for services rendered or products vended. Commissions are a common way to motivate and award salesmen. Commissions can also be designed to encourage specific deals actions. For illustration, commissions may be reduced when granting large abatements.

Learn more about the Commission here: https://brainly.com/question/957886

#SPJ4

Answer:

error, mistake, or a symbolic reprisentation for two different angles and lines

Answer:

a law allowing courts to prevent people who show signs of being a danger to themselves or to others from having access to firearms (as by ordering the seizure of weapons)

The map shows that part of the US that existed following the passage of the Ku Klux Klan Act 1871.

The Enforcement Act of 1871 (17 Stat. 13), also referred to as the Ku Klux Klan Act, Third Enforcement Act, Third Ku Klux Klan Act, Civil Rights Act of 1871, or Force Act of 1871, is a law passed by the US Congress that gave the President the authority to suspend the right to a habeas corpus in order to combat the Ku Klux Klan (KKK) and other terrorist groups. The legislation was approved by the 42nd US Congress and made official on April 20, 1871, by US President Ulysses S. Grant. The act was the final of three Enforcement Acts that the US Congress passed between 1870 and 1871 as part of the Reconstruction Era to defend African Americans' right to vote against attacks.

Learn more about Ku Klux Klan Act, here

https://brainly.com/question/14117703

#SPJ4

The Articles of Confederation were submitted to the states for ratification in late November 1777.

The first kingdom to ratify changed into Virginia on December 16, 1777; 12 states had ratified the Articles by way of February 1779, 14 months into the method.

Under the Articles, the countrywide government consisted of a unicameral (one-residence) legislature (often referred to as the Confederation Congress); there has been no national government or judiciary. Delegates to Congress had been appointed through the manner of the united states' legislatures, and every nation had one vote.

The Dickinson Draft of the Articles of Confederation named the confederation "the US of the united states." After extensive debate and revision, the Second Continental Congress adopted the Articles of Confederation on November 15, 1777.

Learn more about Articles of Confederation here: https://brainly.com/question/13152253

#SPJ4

The plates move occasionally toward and occasionally away from one another due to the heat produced by radioactive processes occurring within the planet's interior. Tectonic shift is another name for this movement.

There are three major layers that make up the Earth. Yellow represents the dense, hot inside core, orange the molten exterior core, red the mantle, and brown the thin crust, which is home to all known forms of life. The extremely hot and dense core of our planet is called the Earth's core. Despite their differences from Earth, they discovered that all other planets should have a nickel/iron core that makes up around 30% of the planet's mass. In contrast, the Earth's core contains nearly one-third of its total mass. Similar to Earth, the mantle and crust would make up the remaining portions of each planet. The inner planets, often known as the terrestrial planets due to their similarity to Earth, are the four planets Mercury, Venus, Earth, and Mars that are nearest to the sun. The relative diameters of these four planets are depicted in Figure 25.7. In comparison to the outer planets, all of the inner planets are small.

Learn more about interior here

https://brainly.com/question/13609426

#SPJ4

Elections present a significant chance to promote political liberalization and democratization. Certain civic liberties, such as the freedoms of speech, association, and assembly, are necessary for a free and fair election.

The freedom to vote is the most significant privilege that citizens enjoy. The people can influence the government through voting. Who will represent the people in government is chosen by the populace. Every voter should be well-informed about the topics and candidates before casting their ballot.

It prohibited the discriminatory voting practices implemented in several southern states following the Civil War, such as the requirement of passing literacy tests in order to cast a ballot. It took 95 years to enact this "act to enforce the fifteenth amendment to the Constitution" after it was ratified.

To know more about  voting for leaders, refer:

https://brainly.com/question/20360240

#SPJ4

The relationship between the federal and state governments is defined by the 10th Amendment, which also contributes to this definition.

The 10th Amendment aims to establish the relationship and balance of power between the federal and state governments. The anti-commandeering concept is the principal instance where the 10th Amendment has been used in recent years. According to this idea, the federal government cannot order the states to carry out specific tasks, such enforcing federal laws. The 10th amendment codifies the federalism principle of the Constitution by stating that the states or the people, as appropriate, shall have all powers not delegated to the federal government or prohibited to the states by the Constitution. The Amendment explicitly states that Congress may not use power in a way that undermines the integrity of the States or their capacity to work effectively within a federal structure.

Learn more about 10th amendment  hear :

https://brainly.com/question/29347929

#SPJ4

Option 5 is correct. Res Ipsa Loquitur can be applied in this case as the actual cause & comparative negligence make both the parties responsible.

About Res Ipsa Loquitur

Res ipsa loquitur is a principle under which a court may deduce negligence from the exact nature of an accident or harm in the lack of direct evidence that any defendant acted in the scope of tort litigation. It is used in common law & Roman-Dutch law jurisdictions. An action normally needs to satisfy the essential factors that constitute negligence: the presence of a duty of care, violation of the proper standard of care, causation, & injury, however particular requirements vary by jurisdiction. In the case of res ipsa loquitur, the very first three criteria are presumed to exist based on the presence of an injury that would not often happen in the absence of carelessness.

To know more about Res Ipsa Loquitur:

brainly.com/question/28548349

#SPJ1

The correct answer is the 'judge may give the jury what is known as the Allen charge.'

The United States Supreme Court ruled in Allen v. United States, 164 U.S. 492 (1896), that a jury instruction meant to persuade minority jurors to change their minds might be used to avoid a hung verdict.

The Court overturned Alexander Allen's two prior convictions for the same act, but upheld his murder conviction.

When a jury reports that it is deadlocked and unable to reach a judgment during deliberation, the court may issue what is known as an Allen charge.

The Allen charge, sometimes known as the "dynamite charge" or the "hammer charge," is utilized to remove jurors from their predetermined seats.

To know more about the 'jury' related questions

visit- https://brainly.com/question/9788151

#SPJ4

Answer:

Explanation:

Where the executive and legislative branches are elected by the people, members of the Judicial Branch are appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate.Article III of the Constitution, which establishes the Judicial Branch, leaves Congress significant discretion to determine the shape and structure of the federal judiciary. Even the number of Supreme Court Justices is left to Congress — at times there have been as few as six, while the current number (nine, with one Chief Justice and eight Associate Justices) has only been in place since 1869. The Constitution also grants Congress the power to establish courts inferior to the Supreme Court, and to that end Congress has established the United States district courts, which try most federal cases, and 13 United States courts of appeals, which review appealed district court cases.Federal judges can only be removed through impeachment by the House of Representatives and conviction in the Senate. Judges and Justices serve no fixed term — they serve until their death, retirement, or conviction by the Senate. By design, this insulates them from the temporary passions of the public, and allows them to apply the law with only justice in mind, and not electoral or political concerns.Generally, Congress determines the jurisdiction of the federal courts. In some cases, however — such as in the example of a dispute between two or more U.S. states — the Constitution grants the Supreme Court original jurisdiction, an authority that cannot be stripped by Congress.The courts only try actual cases and controversies — a party must show that it has been harmed in order to bring suit in court. This means that the courts do not issue advisory opinions on the constitutionality of laws or the legality of actions if the ruling would have no practical effect. Cases brought before the judiciary typically proceed from district court to appellate court and may even end at the Supreme Court, although the Supreme Court hears comparatively few cases each year.Federal courts enjoy the sole power to interpret the law, determine the constitutionality of the law, and apply it to individual cases. The courts, like Congress, can compel the production of evidence and testimony through the use of a subpoena. The inferior courts are constrained by the decisions of the Supreme Court — once the Supreme Court interprets a law, inferior courts must apply the Supreme Court’s interpretation to the facts of a particular case.

The terrorists financed the 9/11 attacks through received some of funds received by Osama Bn Laden from patrons in the United Arab Emirates.

Also known as the September 11 attacks, referred to the 4 coordinated sui-cide terrorist attacks carried out by the Al-Qaeda" against the United States on Tuesday, September 11, 2001.

2. The difference between money laundering and terrorist financing is that money laundering is a process used by a criminal to make his illicit funds appear legal while financing terrorism consists of collecting capital to carry out terrorist activities.

3. Currently, the United States is attempting to reduce terrorist financing through the Bureau of Counterterrorism's, whose mission is to promote national security by taking a leading role in developing coordinated strategies and approaches to defeat terrorism home and abroad.

4. These terrorist organizations raised their money through an Illegal methods such as robbery, counterfeiting, fraud, cigarette smuggling, extortion, kidnapping etc.

5. The terrorist groups move their money through an illegal source known as black channel or black market.

6. An identity theft means the act of stealing personal, private or financial information while an identity fraud is the use of this stolen information.

Read more about 9/11 attacks

brainly.com/question/27720927

#SPJ1

If jupiter park senior center has a weekly payroll of 17500 december 31 falls on wednesday, and a juniper park senior center will pay its employees the following monday. The journal entry is Debit Salaries Expense $10,500; Credit Salaries Payable $10,500.

The appropriate entries to record the given transactions are:

1. Dec. 31

Debit Salaries Expense $10,500

Credit Salaries Payable $10,500

(To record  accrue salaries expense)

Salaries Expense = Weekly payroll ÷ Days in work week × Days to accrue

Salaries Expense = $17,500÷5×3

Salaries Expense =$10,500

(Days to accrue: Wednesday, Thursday, Friday)

2. January 5

Debit salaries expenses $7,000

Debit salaries payable  $10,500

9$17,500 -$7,000)

Credit Cash $17,500

(To record salaries expenses)

Therefore the entry for Dec 31 is to debit salaries expenses and credit salaries payable.

Learn more about journal entry here:https://brainly.com/question/14279491

#SPJ1

The complete question is:

jupiter park senior center has a weekly payroll of 17500 december 31 falls on wednesday, and a juniper park senior center will pay its employees the following monday (january 5th) for the previous full week. assume juniper park senior center has a five day workweek and has an unadjuste balance in salaries expense of 510000

Record the adjusting entry for accrued salaries on December 31.

Record the journal entry for payment of salaries made on January 5.

Salaries Expense:

In general, the law of the sign rule is probably more helpful and easier than the cosign rule.

The length of one side and the measurement of the angle opposing that particular side are necessary to solve a triangle using the law of sines. Then, you must have one more piece of data, such as an additional side length or angle measurement. However, there are times when you are provided information with two consecutive sides but the angle is not between the two consecutive sides, in which case there may be two alternative triangles that can both satisfy the given information. In order to locate the third side according to the sign rule, we would need to know the angle of the other two sides and the angle that is opposite to one of them, without which we would be unable to do so. In this approach, the law of cosigns is helpful for determining the third side of a triangle when the other two sides and their enclosed angle are known and competing with each other.

To know more about law of cosigns

brainly.com/question/22699651

#SPJ4

Not only the fact that the losing party disagreed with the verdict will typically suffice as a legal basis for an appeal; there must be an alleged significant error in the trial. Either side may appeal to a higher court in a civil lawsuit. In most states, the defendant is the only party with the right to appeal in a criminal case.

To learn more about court here:

https://brainly.com/question/13375489

#SPJ4

The supreme court may be on the verge of eliminating race as a consideration for college and university admissions.

In two cases, one concerning Harvard University and another involving the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, the U.S. Supreme Court will start debating whether racial admissions procedures are constitutional on Monday. Affirmative action was last addressed by the court in 2016, when it declared that institutions might take race into account when admitting students.

The extension of a university's intellectual freedom to gather a diverse student body is a comprehensive, race-conscious admissions process. Removing racial criteria from admissions would interfere with a university's capacity to choose its student body.

To know more about Affirmative action:

brainly.com/question/8088645

#SPJ4

In the case of New York v. Quarles, the Supreme Court established an exception to the Miranda prohibition, holding that suspects may be questioned if there is an immediate threat to public safety.

In Miranda v. Arizona (1966), the Supreme Court decided on a 5-4 vote that an arrested person has the right to an attorney and protections against self-discrimination under the 5th and 6th Amendments of the US Constitution.

Suspects must be advised of these rights "prior to questioning," according to the Miranda rule, which the Supreme Court recognized as a constitutional right if their words will be used against them in court. The Miranda decision only applies when the suspect is in custody and being questioned by the police, the Court ruled, because it was created to prohibit the police from pressuring suspects into making statements.

To learn more about Miranda decision, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29548743

#SPJ1

According to updated voting and registration data issued today by the U.S. Census Bureau, the 2020 presidential election saw the highest voter turnout of the twenty-first century, with 66.8% of those 18 and older casting ballots.

In presidential election years, the median age of the electorate as a whole ranged from 39 to 45, while the median age of voters ranged from 43 to 46. Additionally, the Census Bureau offers an interval estimate of voter family income, from which the median family income can be calculated.

The type of election (e.g., presidential or midterm) and the level of competition in the race are other factors that affect voter turnout. the total number of voters in a jurisdiction that are of voting age (18 years of age or older).

To learn more about Voter Turnout visit:

https://brainly.com/question/1270103

#SPJ4

Personal, territorial, and subject matter jurisdiction are the three primary categories of judicial power: No matter where they are, a person is subject to personal jurisdiction.

sentence examples The majority of criminal offenses are under the court's purview. The court, according to his lawyers, lacked jurisdiction in this case. This court lacks jurisdiction over the issue. lands that fall under the federal government's purview He was detained in a different country.

A jurisdiction is a geographical area with a unique set of laws that are governed by a court system or other government body. A separate jurisdiction is formed by each state in a federation like Australia, Germany, or the United States.

To learn more about Jurisdiction visit:

https://brainly.com/question/12448353

#SPJ4

The Supreme Court's most well-known power, judicial review, or the ability of the Court to declare a Legislative or Executive act to be in violation of the Constitution, is not found in the text of the Constitution itself. This doctrine was established by the Court in the case of Marbury v. Madison (1803).

To know more about president's foreign policy power refer:

https://brainly.com/question/14575968

#SPJ4

The intent of the framers to make the federal government responsive to the will of the people is embodied in the fact that the U.S. House of Representatives is granted a unique set of powers in the Constitution.

When the new Constitution was written, what was the Great Compromise?

Also known as the Connecticut Compromise, this major compromise at the Constitutional Convention established a two-house legislature with equal representation for all states in the Senate and proportional representation for states in the House of Representatives.

Who brought about the Great Compromise?

The Records of The Government Show of 1787 at 196.The Great Compromise is often credited by historians to Sherman and the Connecticut delegates.

Learn more about federal government here:

https://brainly.com/question/220248

#SPJ4

Self incrimination is the term used for a person's making admissions in a criminal case that could be used against him in court.

A court is any person or group, frequently as a central authority organization, with the authority to adjudicate prison disputes among parties and perform the administration of justice in civil, crook, and administrative topics in accordance with the guideline of regulation.

A court is any official tribunal presided over with the aid of one or numerous judges wherein prison problems and claims are heard and determined. The U.S. device consists of federal courts and country courts.

Learn more about court here:https://brainly.com/question/1302046
#SPJ4

The positions or platform of each candidate and local issues that might appear on the ballot are the kinds of information essential to know before participating in an election.

An election is a proper institution selection-making technique via which a population chooses an individual or a couple of individuals to maintain public workplace. Elections had been the usual mechanism by which present day representative democracy has operated since the seventeenth century.

Vote casting is a technique for a collection, inclusive of a meeting or an citizens, on the way to make a collective selection or explicit an opinion normally following discussions, debates or election campaigns. Democracies go with holders of excessive workplace with the aid of balloting.

Learn more about election here:https://brainly.com/question/3710013
#SPJ4

Answer:

- A fine of $2,500 for each day the Act was violated up to a maximum of $1 million.

- A fine of up to $2,500 for each day the Act was violated up to $1 million, an injunction mandating the company stop polluting, and a requirement that the company clean up the pollution it caused or pay for the cost of doing so.

- A maximum fine of $500,000.

- A fine of up to $2,500 for each day the Act was violated up to $1 million, plus an injunction.

Based on a 1992 supreme court ruling, an internet-based merchant needed to collect sales taxes only when buyers live in a state where the merchant has a physical presence.

The U.S. Supreme Court declared in the 1992 Quill decision that states can only require internet retailers to collect and remit sales and use taxes if their operations have a physical presence, or "nexus," in the state. This typically required the organization to keep a physical presence in the state, such a warehouse or delivery facility. Otherwise, the online merchants were not legally obligated to fulfil this need.

By building on the fundamental idea of nexus, several states—including California and New York—stepped up their efforts to collect sales tax from online vendors, further complicating the situation. This has resulted in a confusing patchwork of state laws on this subject.

To know more about sales tax :https://brainly.com/question/4031945

#SPJ4

The majority of the evidence amassed in violation of the US Constitution cannot be used by the government due to the exclusionary rule. The exclusionary rule is applicable to evidence obtained through an arbitrary search or seizure that violated the Fourth Amendment, as decided in the case of Mapp v. Ohio.

The Supreme Court effectively established the exclusionary rule by overturning the conviction. The exclusionary rule was then made applicable to the states by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1961 with its ruling in Mapp v. Ohio.

In response to the warrant system's inability to handle fourth amendment violations that occurred after the fact, the courts created the exclusionary rule as a rule of evidence.

The exclusionary rule is used by American courts to prevent police officers and other government employees from violating citizens' constitutional rights. The general norm is that courts will reject evidence that the government obtains by improper means, frequently an illegal search or seizure.

To know more about exclusionary rule, refer:

https://brainly.com/question/29544396

#SPJ4

One of the reasons that the witch trials stand out inside the records of early American regulation is that the court admitted spectral evidence to the proceedings. Spectral evidence changed into testimony in which witnesses claimed that the accused seemed to them and did them harm in a dream or a vision.

If every day by way of a court docket, this testimony becomes actually not possible to refute. however, spectral evidence became not often used to cozy a conviction, as theologians were not able to agree that the devil could not take the form of an innocent person.

The thesis of this paper is that spectral proof changed into being used inside the slim evidential standards to be had in 1692, but there was additionally an acknowledgment at the time that the effect of using this evidence led to unjust convictions.

Learn more about Spectral evidence here https://brainly.com/question/11343096

#SPJ4

The sentence in the underlined word most clearly has the same denotation as a crime can be seen in the following examples:

Context:

1. Jack's offense was minor so he thought it better not to report it.

Context- In this case, the synonym or the closest word that comes close to crime is "offense", without losing any original meaning, even though it might not have the same connotation.

2. Rose apologized for spilling the juice, even though it was a minor misdeed.

Context- In this case, the synonym or the closest word that comes close to crime is "minor misdeed", without losing any original meaning even though it might not have the same connotation.

3. Bob made a mistake and apologized for it.

Context- In this case, the synonym or the closest word that comes close to crime is "apologized", without losing any original meaning even though it might not have the same connotation.

Learn more about this here brainly.com/question/29519058

#SPJ4

Actual malice is the legal requirement imposed on specific defamation plaintiffs when filing a lawsuit for libel or slander, and will be found where a defendant publishes or communicates a false statement with knowledge of its falsity or reckless disregard for its veracity.

#SPJ1

The statement that describes an incident in which a mutation can be helpful is it causes a change in the DNA but not in someone's traits.

Basically, a mutation refers to the change or the process of changing, such as in nature, form, or quality. In biology, its refers to any change in the nucleotide sequence as a result of a failure of the system to revert the change, hence, the altered sequence is permanent and heritable.

We can also see mutation as a permanent or heritable change in the nucleotide sequence or the process by which such a change occurs in a gene or in a chromosome. The small-scale mutations are genetic mutations in the form of substitutions, deletions, and insertions of one or more nucleotides while the mutations occurring in certain areas of chromosomes are large-scale mutations.

Read more about mutation

brainly.com/question/14438201

#SPJ1