In "To Kill a Mockingbird," Atticus explains that Bob Ewell's personal attack and threat were a result of his resentment towards Atticus for defending Tom Robinson.
Atticus believes that Ewell wanted to take revenge on him and his family, which is why he made such a vicious attack. Ewell was also a racist and felt threatened by Atticus's actions, which may have fueled his anger and aggression towards him. However, Atticus remains calm and collected throughout the ordeal, refusing to let Ewell's threats affect him or his family.
Atticus explains that Bob Ewell's personal attack and threat are a result of Ewell's humiliation during the trial. In the trial, Atticus exposed Ewell's lies and poor character, causing him to lose credibility in the eyes of the community. Ewell's personal attack and threat towards Atticus are his attempts to regain some power and control, as well as to retaliate against Atticus for the embarrassment he experienced.
To know more about Tom Robinson visit:
https://brainly.com/question/21896852
#SPJ11
You know that a sharp knife cuts better than a dull knife. Do you know why this is so? Defend your answer.
Answer:
Due to its sleek and polished blade, a sharp knife is more proficient in slicing through objects with ease, as it demands minimal exertion and mitigates the chance of accidental harm, unlike a blunt knife with a jagged and uneven edge that necessitates more force to cut through materials.
Explanation:
A blade's sharpness is determined by its edge thickness. This is inversely proportional to the pressure it can exert on the object being cut. Specifically, a thin edge exerts more pressure than a thicker, blunter one, enabling the knife to slice through the material with greater ease and precision.
Conversely, a dull knife's edge is less thin and less sharp, resulting in a more crushing action than a cutting one. This crushing can cause uneven cuts and even damage the material being cut. Moreover, since more force is required to cut through the material, the risk of slipping and accidentally injuring oneself increases significantly.
By contrast, a sharper knife has a smoother edge. This allows it to cleanly slice through the material. Additionally, since less effort is needed to cut through the material, the risk of the knife slipping and injuring the user is reduced.
What plan does Polonius propose to prove that his theory about Hamlet's madness is correct?
Polonius proposes a plan to prove his theory about Hamlet's madness by using his daughter, Ophelia, as bait.
He advises Ophelia to reject Hamlet's advances and then observe his reaction. Polonius believes that Hamlet's love for Ophelia is the source of his madness, and that his rejection by her will confirm this. He then plans to report his findings to King Claudius, who he hopes will take action to protect himself and the kingdom from Hamlet's supposed madness.
This plan demonstrates Polonius' manipulative nature and disregard for his daughter's feelings, as he is willing to use her as a tool to further his own goals. It also highlights his ignorance of the true cause of Hamlet's behavior, which is driven by his grief over his father's death and his desire for revenge.
In the end, Polonius' plan ultimately leads to Ophelia's tragic demise and contributes to the play's overall theme of the destructive nature of deception and manipulation.
For more question on bait
https://brainly.com/question/1577441
#SPJ11
The Doctor, Amy, & Rory are trapped in a hotel of horrors & they can't find the Tardis. The Doctor has to save all that he can while dealing with his own worst fear.This the summary for _________________.
This is the summary of the Doctor Who episode titled "The God Complex."
The Doctor, Amy, and Rory find themselves trapped in a mysterious hotel that contains rooms that are tailored to each individual's deepest fears. As they try to escape, they discover that the hotel is a prison built to contain a dangerous creature known as the Minotaur.
The Doctor realizes that the hotel is a trap set by the Minotaur, who feeds on the faith of its victims. As the group tries to find a way out, the Doctor confronts his own deepest fear and sacrifices himself to save his companions. They eventually escape, but the Doctor is left shaken by the experience.
Learn more about the summary
https://brainly.com/question/28052614
#SPJ4
Read the following excerpt from "The Comet" by W.E.B. Dubois. Then, answer the question that follows. A grimy newsboy sat in the gutter with the "last edition" in his uplifted hand: "Danger!" screamed its black headlines. "Warnings wired around the world. The Comet's tail sweeps past us at noon. Deadly gases expected. Close doors and windows. Seek the cellar." The messenger read and staggered on. Which type of conflict is most evident in the passage? Character vs. character Character vs. nature Character vs. self Character vs. technology
The conflict between the characters and the natural disaster they are facing serves as a powerful symbol of the fragility of human life in the face of the uncontrollable forces of nature.
The type of conflict most evident in the passage is character vs. nature. The danger presented in the newspaper headline is not something that can be controlled by the characters in the story, but rather is a natural disaster that they must prepare for.
The characters must face the threat of the deadly gases that are expected to come with the passing of the comet's tail, and must take measures to protect themselves by closing doors and windows and seeking the cellar. The conflict is not between the characters themselves or with their own internal struggles, but rather with the forces of nature that threaten their safety and well-being.
The newspaper headline serves to heighten the tension and drama of the situation, and the messenger's reaction to it demonstrates the fear and uncertainty that the characters are experiencing. Overall, the conflict between the characters and the natural disaster they are facing serves as a powerful symbol of the fragility of human life in the face of the uncontrollable forces of nature.
For more such questions on fragility
https://brainly.com/question/31376556
#SPJ11
Answer: Character vs. nature
Explanation: Because hes dealing with nature
An appropriate strategy to learn difficult vocabulary words is the:.
An appropriate strategy to learn difficult vocabulary words is
1) Use flash cards (write the word on one side of the paper and the definition on the other). Then quiz yourself from time to time.
2) Make your own dictionary: write the word, and definition and use it in a sentence.
3) use online sites for vocabulary quizzes to review.
Know more about Vocabulary,
https://brainly.com/question/12531512
https://brainly.com/question/3001031
to make a contented slave, it is necessary to make a thoughtless one' What does this passage mean?
The passage emphasizes that denying someone the ability to think critically and independently makes them vulnerable to control and exploitation, and highlights the importance of safeguarding intellectual freedom.
The passage suggests that to create a contented slave, the slave master must deprive the slave of their ability to think critically and independently. By removing their ability to think, the slave will become submissive and obedient, making them easier to control and less likely to rebel.
This passage highlights the notion that freedom of thought and critical thinking are fundamental to personal freedom and autonomy. In denying someone their ability to think, they become vulnerable to exploitation, manipulation, and control. Thus, this passage speaks to the importance of intellectual freedom as a fundamental human right.
Furthermore, this passage is also relevant to the historical context of slavery, where slave owners attempted to suppress the intellectual capacities of slaves through oppressive measures such as preventing them from learning to read and write. The passage is a reminder that we must remain vigilant in safeguarding intellectual freedom and preventing the oppression of marginalized communities.
To learn more about freedom
https://brainly.com/question/4077647
#SPJ4
read the sentence. the famous artist and sculptor michelangelo sculpted the statue david in italy in the early 1500s. the best reason for the writer to revise this sentence to be in the passive voice is to emphasize
Answer:
Explanation: The statue David in Italy was sculpted by the famous artist and sculptor Michelangelo in the early 1500s.
What is significant about Christopher's character? How does Christopher's character evolve over the course of the story? How would you describe Christopher's personality? Your response should be 200 words or more.
Story: The curious incident of the dog in the night
Answer:
Christopher Boone is a fifteen-year-old boy with Asperger's syndrome, a form of autism that affects how he interacts with others. He is the main character and narrator of the novel, and he gives us a different way of seeing the world. He is also brave, smart, and strong in facing the problems he encounters. He changes a lot throughout the story as he finds out more about himself, his family, and his surroundings. He begins as a boy who follows strict rules and routines, who hates lies and strangers, and who is scared of many things. He also loves math and logic, and he wants to be an astronaut. When he investigates the death of his neighbor's dog, Wellington, he uncovers secrets that break his trust in his father and make him doubt his own identity. He decides to leave home and look for his mother, who he thought was dead, in London. On his journey, he meets many challenges and risks that push him to change and grow. He also meets new people who help him or hurt him. He finally finds his mother and learns to forgive his father. He also takes his A-level math exam and gets a high score and shows his skills. By the end of the novel, he is more confident, independent, and optimistic about his future.
I would say that Christopher's personality is curious, honest, logical, and loyal. He is curious because he likes to learn new things and solve mysteries. He is honest because he always tells the truth and hates lies. He is logical because he thinks in a clear and organized way. He is loyal because he loves his family and friends, especially his pet rat Toby. However, Christopher's personality also has some difficulties. He is sometimes rude, stubborn, and violent. He is rude because he does not understand other people's emotions or expressions. He is stubborn because he does not like to change his mind or habits. He is violent because he hits people when he feels threatened or angry.
I hope this helps you understand Christopher's character better
what is the main argument of the passage? what claims does the author make to support the argument? how valid, relevant, and sufficient is the reasoning and evidence used to support the argument and claims? does the author use false statements or fallacious reasoning to support the argument and claims? use evidence from the text to support your response. your evaluation of the argument should be two or three complete paragraphs.
The context clues can be used to know the claims that the author make to support the argument and how valid it was.
What are context clues?Context clues help to find the meaning of a word taking into account the words that surround the unknown word that make us infer the meaning.
Also called visual indices, these words are described or defined by other words that appear in the same sentence.
This means that they help to infer the meaning of unknown words. An overview was given based on incomplete information.
Learn more about context clues on
https://brainly.com/question/11247029
#SPJ1
What happened when the moose hunters got to the bus where they plan to camp out?
When the moose hunters got to the bus where they planned to camp out, they discovered that the bus was already occupied by a young man named Christopher McCandless. Despite their initial reservations about having someone else there, they eventually welcomed him into their group and shared their supplies and hunting equipment with him.
However, as time went on, tensions rose and disagreements over hunting methods and food distribution led to a strained dynamic within the group.
Eventually, McCandless decided to leave the bus and continue his journey alone, leading to his tragic demise in the Alaskan wilderness.
For more questions on equipment
https://brainly.com/question/9450571
#SPJ11
How much hotter could it possibly get?
Answer:
"The world is 1.1 degrees Celsius (2 Fahrenheit) hotter on average than it was before fossil fuel combustion took off in the 1800s"
Explanation:
:)???????
choose the correct sentence type.why was saul going to damascus?declarativeexclamatoryimperativeinterrogative
The sentence "Why was Saul going to Damascus?" is an example of an interrogative sentence. The Correct option is D
Interrogative sentences are used to ask questions, and they are characterized by their use of a question word or a helping verb to begin the sentence, followed by the subject and the main verb. In this sentence, "why" is the question word, and the word order is subject-verb-object (SVO), which is typical for questions in English.
Interrogative sentences are important in communication as they allow the speaker to seek information, clarification, or confirmation from the listener.
Learn more about characterized
https://brainly.com/question/28649550
#SPJ4
Complete question:
Which of the following sentence types correctly identifies the sentence "Why was Saul going to Damascus?"?
A. Declarative
B. Exclamatory
C. Imperative
D. Interrogative
A sanctuary may be defined as a place where Man is passive and the rest of Nature active. Till quite recently Nature had her own sanctuaries, where man either did not go at all or only as a tool-using animal in comparatively small numbers. But now, in this machinery age, there is no place left where man cannot go with overwhelming forces at his command. He can strangle to death all the nobler wild life in the world to-day. To-morrow he certainly will have done so, unless he exercises due foresight and self-control in the mean time. The author implies that his first definition of a sanctuary is A. Totally wrong B. Somewhat idealistic C. unhelpful D. indefensible E. immutable
Unless he displays the necessary caution and restraint in the interim, he will most likely have done so by tomorrow. The author seems to be somewhat utopian in his initial concept of a sanctuary. Option B is Correct.
One definition of a sanctuary is a location where Man is inactive and the rest of nature is. Nature used to have her own sanctuaries, where man would either not go at all or would only go in relatively limited numbers as an animal that used tools.
However, in this age of machinery, there is nowhere that man cannot travel with powerful forces at his disposal. All of the more noble wild animals alive today can be strangled to death by him. One definition of a sanctuary is a location where Man is still. Option B is Correct.
Learn more about sanctuary Visit: brainly.com/question/26665939
#SPJ4
Truncation is a search technique that helps you find variations of a term or terms. You want to find books on the topic of adaptation or adaptability in relation to biology. Where should you best truncate in this example?.
Answer:
To use truncation to find variations of the terms "adaptation" or "adaptability" in relation to biology, you should truncate the root of the term, which is "adapt". So, the best way to truncate in this example would be to use the symbol "*", which represents any combination of characters that come after the truncated root term.
For example, you could use the search term "adapt*" to find variations of the term, such as "adaptation", "adaptive", "adaptability", etc. This will help you to retrieve a wider range of results related to the concept of adaptation or adaptability in biology.
Explanation:
Why does Forster disagree with this popular opinion?
E.M. Forster was known for his literary criticism and opinionated views on literature. One of the popular opinions he disagreed with was the idea that literature should only serve a didactic or moral purpose.
Forster believed that literature should be judged on its own merits, rather than its ability to impart a lesson or message. Forster argued that literature should be appreciated for its beauty and its ability to capture the complexities of the human experience. He believed that literature was at its best when it was able to transcend moralistic messages and speak to the reader on a deeper level. In his essay "Art for Art's Sake," Forster stated that "the function of art is to hold the mirror up to nature, and that nature includes not only the surface of life but also the depth of life." Forster believed that literature should strive to capture the full range of human experience, and that moralizing messages could only detract from this goal.
To know more about literature refer :
https://brainly.com/question/28188697
#SPJ11
a letter email letter to your cousin about the school trip to the Birla planetarium
Answer:from.your email
to.email of the person
Subject. My trip to Birla Planetarium
Dear name of the cousin
Hope you are well, I have composed this mail to tell you about my trip to Birla Planetarium Jaipur.
It was fun as I enjoyed with my friends on the way to Planetarium.We sang songs, talked,clicked pictures.
When we reached the planetarium there we sat on the chairs then they gave us refreshments, then we say the clip on the recliner seats. I enjoyed, I wish that you were also there.
From my side wish Uncle and Aunt
Yours
your name here
Explanation:
When the Pilgrims came to Plymouth Rock, they were poor and hungry - half of them died within a few months from disease and hunger. When Squanto, a Wampanoag man, found them, they were in a pitiful state. He spoke English, having traveled to Europe, and took pity on them. Their English crops had failed. The native people fed them through the winter and taught them how to grow their food.
The statement provided describes the arrival of the Pilgrims to Plymouth Rock and their interactions with the Wampanoag people.
It highlights the challenges that the Pilgrims faced upon their arrival, including disease and hunger, which resulted in the death of many of them. The statement also mentions the crucial role that Squanto played in helping the Pilgrims, as he was able to communicate with them in English and teach them how to grow their food. The Wampanoag people provided food to the Pilgrims during the winter, which helped them survive.
Overall, the statement emphasizes the importance of the help and support provided by the native people to the Pilgrims during their early years in America.
To learn more about pilgrims, visit here
https://brainly.com/question/17178613
#SPJ4
T/F: Jesus never called Himself the "Son of God;" that was a title given to Him by His disciples that He accepted.
The given statement is wrong. Jesus did refer to Himself as the Son of God in the Bible.
It is false to say that Jesus never called Himself the Son of God. In fact, the Bible records numerous instances where Jesus explicitly referred to Himself as the Son of God.
One example is in John 10:36 where Jesus states, "do you say of Him whom the Father sanctified and sent into the world, 'You are blaspheming,' because I said, 'I am the Son of God'?"
Additionally, in Matthew 26:63-64, during His trial, Jesus confirms His identity as the Son of God when He tells the high priest, "You have said it yourself;
nevertheless I tell you, hereafter you will see the Son of Man sitting at the right hand of Power, and coming on the clouds of heaven."
For more such questions on Jesus, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/10512054
#SPJ11
mika was promoted to manager based on her display of great self-confidence and her intelligence. the assumptions under which mika received her promotion are based on the usefulness of in predicting who will make a good leader
It is important to first understand the assumptions that underlie Mika's promotion to manager. The assumption here is that self-confidence and intelligence are useful predictors of who will make a good leader. This assumption is not unfounded, as many studies have shown that self-confidence and intelligence are positively correlated with effective leadership.
Self-confidence is an important trait for a leader because it allows them to make decisions and take action even in the face of uncertainty and risk. A self-confident leader is able to inspire confidence in their team, which can be a key factor in achieving success. Additionally, intelligence is important because it allows a leader to quickly analyze situations and make informed decisions based on available information.
However, it is important to note that self-confidence and intelligence are not the only factors that contribute to effective leadership. Other traits, such as emotional intelligence, empathy, and the ability to communicate effectively, are also important. Therefore, it is important to assess a candidate's overall fit for a leadership role, rather than relying solely on a few specific traits.
In conclusion, the assumptions underlying Mika's promotion to manager are based on the usefulness of self-confidence and intelligence in predicting who will make a good leader. While these traits are important, they should be considered alongside other important factors in assessing a candidate's fit for a leadership role.
Learn more about Self-confidence here:
https://brainly.com/question/30843911
#SPJ11
In a letter sent to Pierre's house, Ellen revealed that she had ---(Blank).
In a letter sent to Pierre's house, Ellen revealed her feelings.
What was the novel about?"War and Peace", authored by Leo Tolstoy, was initially published in 1869. It is revered as one of the greatest literary pieces known to man and acclaimed for its intricate plot, astute historic accuracy, and highly-developed characters.
The novel chronicles multiple Russian aristocratic clans who were alive during the Napoleonic Wars. Purportedly at the center of this narrative sits Pierre Bezukhov - a wealthy, altruistic character searching along their journey for philosophical and theological instruction from Father Paisius, a hermit encountered.
Learn more about novel on
https://brainly.com/question/560023
#SPJ1
true or false: russian-speaking learners of english as a second language should have no difficulty with voicing contrasts in english.
this has to be 20 letters
the answer is false
this is an episodic novel written in small vignettes or literary sketches. what observation about family do you think cisneros is making in this chapter?
Based on the terms provided, it is likely that the question is referring to Sandra Cisneros' novel "The House on Mango Street."
As the novel is episodic and composed of small vignettes or literary sketches, it does not have traditional chapters. Therefore, without more information about the specific chapter in question, it is difficult to provide a detailed answer. However, overall, "The House on Mango Street" explores themes of identity, community, and the immigrant experience, often focusing on the lives and experiences of young Latina women. In terms of family, the novel portrays complex and sometimes fraught relationships between family members, particularly mothers and daughters. Cisneros may be making observations about the challenges of navigating family dynamics while also grappling with larger societal issues.
To know more about "The House on Mango Street." visit:
https://brainly.com/question/27725334
#SPJ11
A colon may appear in each of the following places except
Select one:
before a list.
after an incomplete sentence.
between two main clauses
before a quotation.
A colon may appear in each of the following places except between two main clauses. So the 3rd option is correct.
A colon is used to separate two clauses or phrases in a sentence or to introduce a list of items. A colon can also be used to introduce a list of items.
A colon should not be used before a quotation as it can be confusing to readers as to whether the quotation is part of the sentence or a separate sentence. In this case, a comma should be used instead. For example, you might say: "I am looking forward to the party," he said.
To learn more about punctuation link is here
brainly.com/question/12933782
#SPJ1
What did Chris do on frequent visits to Franz's apartment in Salton City?
On frequent visits to Franz's apartment in Salton City Chris might have watched movies, played video games, cooked and shared meals, listened to music, talked about their interests and hobbies, discussed current events and politics, or simply hung out and relaxe.
However, if we assume that Chris and Franz are friends, colleagues, or acquaintances, we can speculate about the activities they might have engaged in during Chris's frequent visits to Franz's apartment in Salton City.
For example, they might have watched movies, played video games, cooked and shared meals, listened to music, talked about their interests and hobbies, discussed current events and politics, or simply hung out and relaxed. They might have also gone out to explore the surrounding area, such as visiting local attractions, hiking, swimming, or socializing with other people.
Without more information about Chris and Franz's relationship and preferences, it is impossible to know for sure what they did during their visits. However, it is likely that they spent time doing activities that they both enjoyed and that helped them bond as friends or colleagues.
For more question on apartment
https://brainly.com/question/18270556
#SPJ11
At the time of publication of the notice of Chris's death, what problem did the police have?
They had a ton of people calling claiming to know him or have seen him.
What issue did the police have at the time the notice of Chris's death was published? I couldn't place him. How was Chris's genuine last name discovered by the police? message on the bus door. According to the data you've provided, it appears that at the time the notification of Chris's death was published
the police were dealing with the problem of managing a large number of incoming calls from people claiming to have information about Chris, whether it be that they knew him or had seen him.
This is a common issue for law enforcement in high-profile cases or cases that attract a lot of public attention.
The police would need to shift through these calls to determine if any of them contained useful information that could help with their investigation.
To know more about claiming visit:
https://brainly.com/question/11821330
#SPJ4
Why doesn’t lady capulet want her husband to get involved in the fight?.
In Shakespeare's play "Romeo and Juliet," Lady Capulet does not want her husband, Lord Capulet, to get involved in the fight because he is too old and she believes he will not be able to handle himself in the brawl.
She also believes that it is not his place to get involved in the disputes of the younger generation. When Lord Capulet insists on joining the fight, Lady Capulet warns him that he will regret it and urges him to stay out of it. This shows that Lady Capulet is practical and cautious, and is concerned for her husband's well-being.
Lady Capulet wants to prevent her husband from getting involved in the fight because she fears for his safety. She tells him, "You'll make a mutiny among my guests!" She is also aware that the feud between their family and the Montagues is dangerous and has caused enough trouble already. She believes that if Lord Capulet participates in the fight, it will only escalate the situation and make things worse. Additionally, Lady Capulet wants to maintain the social decorum of the party and prevent any disturbances or violence from occurring, as it would reflect poorly on their family's reputation.
To learn more about Lady Capulet, visit here
https://brainly.com/question/27850355
#SPJ4
Explain how the story of Pyrrhus parallels Hamlet's problem.
The story of Pyrrhus, an ancient Greek king, parallels Hamlet's problem in several ways. Pyrrhus was faced with a difficult decision to avenge his father's death, just as Hamlet was faced with the same dilemma.
However, both Pyrrhus and Hamlet struggle with the consequences of taking revenge. Pyrrhus ultimately finds that his desire for revenge brings him no satisfaction, as he becomes plagued with guilt and inner turmoil. Similarly, Hamlet's quest for revenge causes him to become increasingly unstable, leading to tragic consequences for himself and those around him.
Furthermore, both Pyrrhus and Hamlet struggle with the conflict between duty and personal desires. Pyrrhus must choose between his duty as a king and his desire for revenge, while Hamlet must choose between his duty to his father and his own morality. In both stories, revenge ultimately leads to destruction and tragedy, highlighting the dangers of revenge and the importance of forgiveness and inner peace.
For more question on dilemma
https://brainly.com/question/20177663
#SPJ11
Is this were nerd and Ruth kissed each other?
Ruth and Nerd gave each other a kiss. The angst-filled, intensely emotional tale of Penny and Tate, whose lives have frequently collided because their moms are close friends, is Six Times We Almost Kissed.
Tate and Penny resolve to end their feud once Penny's mother agrees to donate her living liver to Tate's mother. There will be no more arguments, drama, or fighting between them.
The girls' ceasefire must last because they are compelled to coexist while their moms recuperate; doing so also requires letting go of the previous incidents that have repeatedly torn them apart. The two of them frequently wind up on the verge of kissing, which is the one little drawback. tracking the course of their relationship's six crucial events.
Learn more about Ruth Visit: brainly.com/question/27171675
#SPJ4
What sad discovery does Krakauer make just a quarter mile down stream on the river?
After retracing Chris McCandless's steps and discovering the bus where he had lived and died, Krakauer walks down to the river and makes a sad discovery just a quarter mile downstream.
He finds a note left by McCandless, written in a book and hidden in a plastic bag. In the note, McCandless writes that he has been unable to gather enough food and is extremely weak.
He says that he is going to attempt to hike out to the highway, but he doesn't expect to survive the journey. This note reveals that McCandless knew he was in dire straits and had very little hope of surviving.
Learn more about Chris McCandless's
https://brainly.com/question/14663749
#SPJ4
Which sentence is in the first person point of view?
The wolf talked to Little Red Riding Hood
The wolf went to Grandma's house.
The hunter helped Little Red Riding Hood.
We shouldn't trust the wolf.
The sentence that is in the first person point of view is not included in the options given. The first person point of view is when the narrator or speaker refers to themselves as "I" or "we". None of the sentences provided use these pronouns. Instead, they use the third person point of view where the narrator or speaker refers to the characters as "he", "she", "it", or "they".
However, out of the given options, the sentence that is closest to the first person point of view is "The hunter helped Little Red Riding Hood". This is because the sentence is from the perspective of someone who is aware of the hunter's actions and is narrating the story. The hunter is the subject of the sentence, and the speaker is relaying the hunter's actions. It's important to note that the first person point of view is not present in any of the given sentences. As a writer, understanding the different points of view can help you determine the best way to tell your story and convey your message effectively.
To know more about sentence refer :
brainly.com/question/14505123
#SPJ11
