The correct answer is (a) Sir Walter Raleigh.
One of the most well-known explorers during the reign of Elizabeth I was Sir Walter Raleigh. The Queen loved him for his bravery and excellent beauty, and she generously rewarded him.
At the court of Queen Elizabeth I of England, Sir Walter Raleigh was a well-known figure. He was a great Renaissance man who produced poetry, history, and was a devoted explorer and settler. When he secretly wed one of the Queen's maids in 1592, he lost the Queen's favor; he was even briefly detained in the Tower of London. However, he managed to talk his way out of the Tower and persuade the Queen to give him permission to lead an expedition to the New World in order to conquer El Dorado before the Spanish discovered it. The Queen approved of sending Raleigh on his mission because she was always looking for ways to surpass the Spanish.
To know more about Sir Walter Raleigh click:
https://brainly.com/question/10387693
#SPJ4
On what concept did the first two commandments focus? โ EdTech
The correct option is B) that the first two commandments concentrate on monotheism.
What is monoethism ?
The three religions of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam readily meet the definition of monotheism, which is to worship one god while rejecting the existence of other gods.
The majority of mainstream Old Testament scholars agree that the early Israelites' religion was neither monotheistic nor polytheistic; rather, it was "monstrous." While the existence of other gods was not denied, Israel was told to only worship Yahweh. The Mosaic Covenant transformed Israel into Yahweh's people and into his "confederate god."
Monotheism is the belief that there is only one such God. Before examining the five most important arguments for God's exclusivity, this article briefly reviews the historical development of monotheism. The simplicity, perfection, sovereignty, omnipotence, and desire for total devotion of God will all be used as arguments in this discussion.
To know more about Monoethism follow the link.
brainly.com/question/269665
#SPJ4
The following debate may contain fallacies. Assume the speakers are telling the truth. Identify the category of fallacy in which each belongs, and why.
[Republican campaign chairman] SCOTT REID: There is a clear pattern of campaign finance abuse by the [Clinton] administration. Indonesian business interests have steered millions into the President’s campaign using a gardener as a front, and [Democratic fund-raiser] John Huang, who apparently laundered money at a fund-raiser at a Buddhist temple in California, is suddenly nowhere to be found.
[President Clinton's advisor] GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS: I can’t let these charges go unrefuted. Dole has received millions from foreign supporters like José Fanjul, and his vice chairman for finance, Simon Fireman, had to pay the largest fine in the history of the country for massive violations of campaign-finance laws. — On NBC’s Meet the Press
In regards to the [Republican campaign chairman], the fallacy identified is Ad Hominem. In the short text, there is a broad attach on representation used by the presidency such as the farmer and Buddhist.
In the fallacy observed, there is attack on people's occupation, ethnicity, nature of work, or other irrelevant characteristics of the people that the presidency used.
Another fallacy seen is Appeal to Ignorance, when the statement was made on "I can’t let these charges go unrefuted".
What is Ad Hominem?Ad hominem fallacies rely on rhetorical tricks rather than reason. This fallacy happens when someone rejects or condemns another point of view because of the individual holding it's personal attributes, ethnic background, physical characteristics, or other irrelevant traits.
Ad hominem attacks, sometimes known as "mudslinging," are frequently utilized in politics. Because politicians can use them to sway voters' attitudes against an opponent without addressing fundamental issues, they are viewed as unethical.
An ad hominem fallacy is when the focus of the argument is on the person making it rather than the argument itself, and the argument as a whole is not addressed. We don't need to make a distinction between the various types of ad hominem arguments in this instance.
Learn more about fallacy from
https://brainly.com/question/1971023
#SPJ1
30 point questionRead these passages. Each source is related to the 1858 debates between Stephen A. Douglas and Abraham Lincoln as they campaigned for a seat in the United States Senate.Source 1Over 150 years ago, Abraham Lincoln and Stephen A. Douglas held seven debates as they campaigned for a Senate seat in Illinois. The debates focused on the issue of slavery and its expansion into the territories. Douglas helped overturn the prohibition on slavery in the territories of Kansas and Nebraska with the Kansas-Nebraska Act. Referred to as popular sovereignty, it meant that citizens in Kansas and Nebraska, not the federal government, could determine whether slavery should be allowed to exist in these territories.Source 2That is the real issue (with the question of slavery]. . . . It is the eternal struggle between these two principles – right throughout the world. They are the two principles that have stood face to face from the beginning of time; and will ever continue to struggle. The one is the common right of humanity and the other the divine right of and wrong throughout the world, there are two principles that have stood face to face for the beginning of time; and will ever continue to struggle. The one is the common right of humanity and the other the Divine rights of kings. is is the same principle in whenever shape it develops itself. Which is the same right spirit that was "You work and toll and earn bread, and ill eat it" no matter in what shape it comes, whether from the mouth of a king who seeks to bestride the people of his own nation and live by the fruit of their labor, or from one race of men, as an apology for enslaving another race it is the same trannical principle.- Abraham Lincoln, during the seventh debate with Stephen A DouglasWhich statement describes the difference between source 1 and source 2?A. Source 1 is a primary source, while source 2 is a secondary source.B. Source one is an example of historiography, while source 2 is an example of bias.C. Source 1 is a secondary source, while source 2 is a primary source.D. Source 1 is an example of bias, while source 2 is an example of historiography.
One of the most significant distinctions between Abraham Lincoln and Stephen A. perspectives on slavery is that, in contrast to Lincoln, Douglas did not see slavery as a moral dilemma, an agonizing choice, or a problem that would split the Union.
They sparred as middle-aged men on the Illinois prairies for a US Senate seat before competing on a national scale for the presidency of the United States. These two men from Illinois were furious rivals for for 25 years before becoming excellent friends in the end. During the 1858 Illinois senate election, Democratic Senator Stephen A. Douglas and Republican opponent Abraham Lincoln engaged in a series of seven debates. The expansion of slavery into American territories was the primary topic of discussion. On June 16, 1858, Abraham Lincoln gave the now-famous "House Divided" address in Springfield, Illinois, kicking off his bid for the U.S. Senate.
To learn more about Abraham Lincoln and Stephen A click the link below:
brainly.com/question/10612924
#SPJ4
an aristocrat would give vassals land in an agreement in which the vassals would then give protection to the lord.
An Aristocrat would grant land to vassals in exchange for the vassals' protection of the lord. It began in Northern Europe and spread throughout the continent, but Italy experienced the greatest levels of feudalism.
According to the terms of the feudal agreement, the lord was required to give his vassal a fief, to provide for his protection, and to administer justice in his court. In exchange, the lord was entitled to certain "incomes" known as feudal occurrences, as well as the power to demand the services related to the fief (military, judicial, and administrative). Relief, a payment paid when a fief was given to an heir or alienated by the vassal, and scutage, a tax paid in lieu of military duty, are two examples of events. Arbitrary agreements were eventually replaced by a system of set dues for events with a customary time restrict.
learn more about vassals land here:
https://brainly.com/question/1905046
#SPJ4
