Answer:
The "conflict thesis" is a concept in the history of science and religion that posits that there is an inherent and irreconcilable conflict between science and religion. This idea suggests that the two are in constant opposition and that progress in one necessarily comes at the expense of the other. This thesis was popularized in the late 19th century by scholars like John William Draper and Andrew D White, who claimed that the rise of modern science in the 17th and 18th centuries had been hindered by the church.
Explanation:
However, this methodology is historically problematic because it oversimplifies the complex and varied relationship between science and religion over time. While there have certainly been instances of tension and conflict between the two, there have also been many instances of cooperation, dialogue, and mutual influence. Additionally, the conflict thesis tends to essentialize both science and religion, treating them as monolithic entities that have remained static over time.
One relevant historical example associated with the conflict thesis is the Galileo affair. This was a conflict between Galileo Galilei and the Catholic Church in the early 17th century over the heliocentric model of the solar system, which Galileo supported. The church saw this model as contradicting scripture and forced Galileo to recant his views. This event has often been used to illustrate the conflict between science and religion, but it is important to note that the Galileo affair was a complex political and social event that cannot be reduced to a simple clash between two worldviews.
How might zinn have fashioned the political system of the US and would this have proven beneficial to society as a whole
Zinn's assessment of US history correlate more with Republican views rather than the Federalist's view.
He was quite sympathetic to the nation's social and economic elites and believes that the Constitution does not provide adequate protection for certain segments of the American population.
Further more, he explained that democracy's problem in post-Revolutionary America was not primarily due to Constitutional limitations on voting because rather, had more to do with the social classes of the time.
He was also critical of Madison's argument of Federalist by aksing if the goal of the government is to just maintain order between two equally matched groups.
Read more about Zinn on:
brainly.com/question/13847372
#SPJ1
How did Hitler achieve to persecute the Jewish?
Through a set of laws and programs known as the "Final Solution," Hitler and the Nazi Party were able to persecute and eventually murder Jews.
Hitler became Germany's chancellor in 1933 and began adopting laws intended at marginalizing and discriminating against Jews. He enacted legislation that made it illegal for Jews to work in certain occupations.
Hitler and the Nazi Party persecuted and exterminated Jews using a mix of laws, policies, and propaganda, and their acts have been universally criticized as a flagrant violation of human rights and a crime against humanity.
Learn more about Jewish, here:
https://brainly.com/question/11650171
#SPJ1
Which of the following belongs in the empty box below?
President Eisenhower backs the
Shah of Iran in an effort to
prevent communist powers
from obtaining Iranian oil
supplies
Shah of Iran flees from
the Ayatollah Khomeini
to the U.S.
O America boycotts OPEC and begins drilling for oil in Gulf of Mexico
O Iranian students storm U.S. embassy in Tehran, taking 52 American hostages
President Carter deports the Shah back to Iranian officials
OPEC cuts off U.S. oil supplies, leading to high gas prices
The event that belongs in the empty box is the 1953 CIA led coup that ousted Iran's democratically elected prime minister Mohammad Mossadegh, who had nationalized Iran's oil industry, and restored power to the pro-Western shah, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi.
The CIA coup in IranThe 1953 covert operation by the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) of the United States to remove Iran's democratically elected Prime Minister, Mohammad Mossadegh, and reinstate the pro-Western Shah of Iran, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, was known as the CIA coup in Iran.
The CIA collaborated with the British intelligence service MI6 to arm and train Iranian agents for the coup as well as to run propaganda efforts against Mossadegh's regime. An organized military and political campaign that was the culmination of the operation was successful in toppling Mossadegh's administration and restoring the Shah to power.
The CIA coup in Iran remains a controversial and sensitive topic in Iranian and international relations to this day.
Learn more on the CIA coup here https://brainly.com/question/932408
#SPJ1
The complete question is:
Which of the following belongs in the empty box below?
President Eisenhower backs the
Shah of Iran in an effort to
prevent communist powers
from obtaining Iranian oil
supplies
Shah of Iran flees from
the Ayatollah Khomeini
to the U.S.
O America boycotts OPEC and begins drilling for oil in Gulf of Mexico
O Iranian students storm U.S. embassy in Tehran, taking 52 American hostages
President Carter deports the Shah back to Iranian officials
OPEC cuts off U.S. oil supplies, leading to high gas prices
Please give answer now.
From The Movie The Green Berets
In the initial part of the movie, there was a demonstration of the capabilities of the Green Berets. Explain the discussion between those who support the military and those who were against the war.
In the initial part of the movie "The Green Berets," there is a discussion between those who support the military and those who are against the war. Supporters highlight the need for military intervention to protect freedom, while opponents argue against the war, emphasizing the loss of life and the questionable motives behind it.
In the initial part of the movie "The Green Berets," a demonstration of the Green Berets' capabilities sparks a discussion between those who support the military and those who are against the war. The supporters emphasize the importance of military intervention in preserving freedom and democracy, viewing the Green Berets as patriotic heroes defending their country. They argue that the war is necessary to prevent the spread of communism and protect American interests abroad.
On the other hand, the opponents of the war raise concerns about the loss of life and question the motives behind the conflict. They criticize the government's decision to send troops to a foreign land, arguing that it is an unnecessary and unjustified war. They express skepticism about the effectiveness of military intervention and highlight the potential for civilian casualties and long-lasting consequences.
The discussion between these two sides reflects the broader societal debates and divisions surrounding the Vietnam War during the era in which the movie was released. It presents contrasting viewpoints on the use of military force and raises moral and political questions about the nature of warfare and its consequences.
For such more question on protect freedom
https://brainly.com/question/19131523
#SPJ11
In the document "Pat Buchanan on the Culture War (1992), he claimed that Bill Clinton's election would lead to the election of Clinton and Clinton . Quote " The agenda that Clinton & Clinton would impose on America : Anaphora . That's change , all right. But that's not the kind of change America needs . It's not the kind of change America wants . And it's not the kind of change we can abide in a nation we still call "God's country . "
Overall, this quote from Pat Buchanan's document "Pat Buchanan on the Culture War (1992)" suggests that he was strongly opposed to the Clintons and believed that their election would bring about negative changes to the country.
What is the loses of change?
This quote suggests that Pat Buchanan believed that Bill Clinton's election, and the subsequent election of his wife Hillary Clinton, would bring about significant and undesirable changes to America. The use of anaphora, or the repetition of the word "change," emphasizes his point and suggests that he believed these changes would be harmful to the country.
Buchanan's statement implies that the changes proposed by the Clintons would be against the values and beliefs of many Americans, as he refers to the United States as "God's country." He suggests that the changes would be unwelcome and not in line with the desires of the American people.
Bill Clinton defeated in the 1992 presidential election.
What is the most effective method for changing society—voting, challenges in the courts, nonviolent civil disobedience, or violence?
Answer:
The most effective method for changing society would be through show of force, which is using a violent tactic.
Explanation:
The question is not asking about whether or not a method is effective in the long-term, nor is there a checklist of the requirements that should be met in changing society. Society as a whole effectively changes through violence, regardless if the said violence is in the spotlight or not.
An really great example of violent tactics being the force that changed the trajectory of US public in relations to racial tensions is the black panthers, who believed that nonviolent protests are not as effective, and that both the defense of the African American's personal lives and their liberties through aggression was called for to sustain equal rights. The violence of the Black Panthers, in that case, drew many to support more moderate forms of protests for equal rights, such as the protest under Martin Luther King Jr.
Whether or not the methodology of violence is effective directly or indirectly, they have been used to create change, or even dismantle current systems. While the Black Panthers may be seen as a way in which violence indirectly helped peaceful causes to gain the common goal of equality, there examples in which violence can directly change the trajectory of society.
A good example of a direct violent change is the Vietnam War, in which the unpopular South Vietnamese government under Ngo Dinh Diem, caused a war to break out in which rebels (known as Viet Congs), aided by North Vietnamese (North Vietnamese Army), rebelled and removed the Diem government after the United States pulled out of the war due to public outcry and protests. Through violence, the Communists were able to reunite the country and provide their free reign of terror on their citizens through Bamboo Gulags, which were essentially reeducation as well as extermination camps. This method was extremely effective in cracking down on dissent and keeping the country aligned with communist values.
Of course, this is extremely dependent on the culture and nation that is being addressed, but if all other methods of changing society fails, violence is the last resort in most cases, to impose the winners will on all. As the last resort, it will also mean that it is the most effective in producing the results that are required in most cases.
Learn more about how society changes, here:
https://brainly.com/question/9072369
Neither government policy, private business or individual could affect the changing fortunes of Britain in the years 51-79. Britain as a power was wholly at the whim of a global economy. How far do you agree?
Answer:
The period between 1951 and 1979 was marked by significant changes in the global economy, and Britain was not immune to those changes. During this time, Britain's economy experienced ups and downs, including significant post-war reconstruction, followed by periods of economic growth and decline. Britain's economy was heavily influenced by international trade and global events such as the Cold War, the Vietnam War, and the oil crises of the 1970s.
On the one hand, it can be argued that Britain was at the mercy of the global economy during this period. The changing fortunes of the world economy had a significant impact on Britain's economic growth, employment rates, and inflation. For instance, the 1973 oil crisis led to a sharp rise in oil prices, which negatively affected Britain's economy, leading to high inflation rates, rising unemployment, and a balance of payments crisis.
On the other hand, it can also be argued that government policies, private businesses, and individuals had some degree of control over Britain's economic fortunes during this period. For instance, the British government implemented policies such as the National Health Service and the National Insurance Act, which aimed to improve the welfare of citizens and provide a safety net for workers. Similarly, private businesses invested in research and development, and innovation to remain competitive in the global economy, while individuals also played a role in driving economic growth through their consumption and investment habits.
In conclusion, while the global economy undoubtedly influenced Britain's economic fortunes during the period 1951-1979, it would be an oversimplification to suggest that government policy, private business, and individual behavior had no role in shaping the country's economy.
True-False: As a result of the Battle of New Orleans, Andrew Jackson became a war hero and the United States demonstrated that it would fight to preserve its Independence from Great Britain.
Given statment "As a result of the Battle of New Orleans, Andrew Jackson became a war hero and the United States demonstrated that it would fight to preserve its Independence from Great Britain." is true. Because the Battle of New Orleans made Andrew Jackson a war hero and symbolized America's determination to defend its independence.
True. The Battle of New Orleans, which took place in 1815 during the War of 1812, resulted in a decisive victory for the United States under the leadership of General Andrew Jackson.
The battle occurred after the signing of the Treaty of Ghent, which officially ended the war, but news of the treaty had not yet reached the combatants.
The American victory at the Battle of New Orleans boosted national morale and solidified Andrew Jackson's reputation as a war hero. It also demonstrated the United States' determination to defend its independence and territorial integrity against British forces. The battle became a symbol of American resilience and helped shape the nation's identity.
However, it is important to note that the Battle of New Orleans did not directly impact the outcome of the War of 1812 or influence the terms of the Treaty of Ghent.
The treaty had already been negotiated before the battle took place. Nevertheless, the battle's significance in American history as a symbol of patriotism and determination remains true.
For similar question on Battle of New Orleans
https://brainly.com/question/2318911
#SPJ11
The German air force bombed Britain for over eight months in an unsuccessful attempt to invade
The German air force bombed Britain for over eight months in an unsuccessful attempt to invade during World War II.
What was outcome of Germany's bombing campaign?The German air force launched a bombing campaign on Britain known as the Battle of Britain. The campaign lasted for over eight years as the Germans hoped that by destroying Britain's air defenses and demoralizing its population and could clear the way for a successful invasion of the country.
Despite causing significant damage to British cities and infrastructure, the bombing campaign ultimately failed to achieve its objectives. The Royal Air Force defended the country's airspace and the German military was never able to launch a successful invasion of Britain.
Read more about World war II
brainly.com/question/651584
#SPJ1
What are 3 other ways suggested to elect a president other than the winner take all electoral college?
The three ways will be:
District electoral vote.
Proportional electoral vote.
National bonus plan.
The automated proposal, which will consequently allocate electoral votes according to each state's present the winner-takes system. The President must receive 270 electoral votes in total to win. One elector for each Republican member of the U.S. House of Representatives. There was also a National bonus plan and the Proportional electoral vote that can be accepted. A senator is the number of individuals who are part of your state's legislative delegations.
Learn more about National bonus, here:
https://brainly.com/question/4486485=
#SPJ1
The influx of political refugees into the United States and the willingness of the U.S. government to accept these refugees have the greatest impact on which of the following? A. perceived gender and racial inequality B. government funding for social security C. income disparity between the wealthy and poor D. diplomatic relations with other countries
The influx of political refugees into the United States and the willingness of the U.S. government to accept these refugees have the greatest impact on diplomatic relations with other countries
What does The influx of political refugees into the United States and the willingness of the U.S. government to accept these refugees have the greatest impact on?The acceptance of political refugees can have an impact on diplomatic relations with other countries, especially those from which the refugees are fleeing. It can also impact foreign policy and international perceptions of the United States as a nation that values human rights and provides asylum to those in need.
This can affect trade, aid, and other aspects of diplomacy between nations. Additionally, the treatment of refugees can have an impact on the perception of the United States in the international community.
Learn more about political refugees at https://brainly.com/question/4701119
#SPJ1
What realization did China and Japan share following the Dino Japanese war
Answer:
The Second Sino-Japanese War, also known as the War of Resistance Against Japan, was a brutal and devastating conflict that lasted from 1937 to 1945. Following the war, both China and Japan realized the enormous toll that the conflict had taken on their countries and their people. Japan, which had been severely weakened by the war, experienced widespread destruction and loss of life, and was forced to cede all of its territorial gains in China, as well as other territories in the Pacific.
China, on the other hand, emerged from the war as a major military and political power, having successfully fought off a much larger and better-equipped enemy. The war also brought about a greater sense of unity and nationalism among the Chinese people, who had rallied together to fight a common enemy. Overall, the realization that war brought destruction and suffering to both sides contributed to a renewed effort to avoid future conflicts between China and Japan.
Explanation:
Which of these divides the earth in half? *
Compass rose
South Pole
equator
Border
The equator divides the Earth into two equal halves, the Northern Hemisphere and the Southern Hemisphere.
The equator is the geographic line that divides the Earth into two equal halves: the Northern Hemisphere and the Southern Hemisphere. It is an imaginary circle that lies equidistant from the Earth's poles and is located at 0 degrees latitude. The equator serves as a reference point for measuring latitude.
The compass rose, on the other hand, is a navigational tool that displays the cardinal directions (north, south, east, and west) and their intermediate points on a map or a chart. It does not divide the Earth into halves, but rather provides orientation and direction.
The South Pole is the southernmost point on Earth, situated at the bottom of the planet. It is not a line that divides the Earth in half, but rather a geographic point.
"Border" is a general term used to describe the line or boundary that separates two regions or countries. While borders can divide land areas, they do not necessarily divide the Earth in half.
Therefore, the correct answer is the equator, as it is the line that divides the Earth into two equal halves, the Northern Hemisphere and the Southern Hemisphere.
For more such question on Earth
https://brainly.com/question/28508029
#SPJ11
