What is the missing side length?

f(3x - 1) = 6x - 1

Rewrite 6x - 1 as a function of 3x - 1:

6x - 1 = 6x - 2 + 1 = 2(3x - 1) + 1

That is,

f(3x - 1) = 2(3x - 1) + 1

which means

f(x) = 2x + 1

and so

f(0) = 2*0 + 1 = 1

Answer:

The ratio of the expenses shared by Akmal to Bakri to Cadin is 7 : 4 : 3

Step-by-step explanation:

The 3 of them shares their mother medical expenses which cost RM4200 . There mother medical expenses is RM4200 in total. Cadin pays RM2100 which is half of their mother medical expenses. Then Akmal pays three quarters of Bakri amount.

Let

The amount Bakri pays = a

Akmal pays = 3/4 of a

Akmal pays = 3/4a

Therefore,

a + 3a/4 = 2100

4a + 3a/ 4 = 2100

7a/4 = 2100

cross multiply

7a = 8400

divide both sides by 7

a = 8400/7

a = 1200

Therefore,

Bakri pays =RM 1200

Akmal pays = 3/4 × 1200 =RM 900

The ratio of the expenses shared by AKmal to Bakri to Cadin is expressed as 2100 : 1200 : 900. Divide through by 300

7 : 4 : 3

Answer:

A=36

B=36

C=108

Step-by-step explanation:

A =B

2A+C=180

C is greater than A

2A+(A+72) =180

SIMPLIFY

3A +72=180

-72 ON BOTH SIDES

3A=108

DIVIDE BY 3

A=36

SO

B=36

36 TIMES 2 IS 72

180-72=108

SO

C=108

hope this helps

Answer:

Angle C= 108

Angles A and B=36

Step-by-step explanation:

180-72=108

108-72= 36

Check

36+36=72

72+108=180

Answer:

[tex]z=\frac{0.53 -0.81}{\sqrt{\frac{0.81(1-0.81)}{861}}}=-20.943[/tex]  

The p value would be given by:

[tex]p_v =P(z<20.943)\approx 0[/tex]  

The p value is a very low value compared to the significance level given so then we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis and we can conclude that the true proportion is significantly less than 0.81

Step-by-step explanation:

Info given

n=861 represent the random sample

[tex]\hat p=0.53[/tex] estimated proportion of people who responded play on a pc computer

[tex]p_o=0.81[/tex] is the value that we want to test

[tex]\alpha=0.05[/tex] represent the significance level

z would represent the statistic

[tex]p_v[/tex] represent the p value

Hypothesis to test

We want to verify if the true proportion decreases from 81%, the system of hypothesis are.:  

Null hypothesis:[tex]p\geq 0.81[/tex]  

Alternative hypothesis:[tex]p < 0.81[/tex]  

The statistic is given by:

[tex]z=\frac{\hat p -p_o}{\sqrt{\frac{p_o (1-p_o)}{n}}}[/tex] (1)  

Replacing the info given we got:

[tex]z=\frac{0.53 -0.81}{\sqrt{\frac{0.81(1-0.81)}{861}}}=-20.943[/tex]  

The p value would be given by:

[tex]p_v =P(z<20.943)\approx 0[/tex]  

The p value is a very low value compared to the significance level given so then we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis and we can conclude that the true proportion is significantly less than 0.81

Answer:

1. 0.5 L; 2. 5.00 L  

Step-by-step explanation:

V = 5.00 - 0.5n

If you include units, the equation becomes

V(in litres) = 5.00 L - (0.5 L/day) × (n days)

1. Rate of evaporation

When you include the units, it becomes easier to see that the water is evaporating at a rate of 0.5 L/day.

That is, 0.5 L of water evaporates each day.

The negative sign shows that the volume of water is decreasing.

2. Volume at the beginning

At the beginning of the experiment, n = 0. Then

V = 5.00 -0.5×0 = 5.00 - 0 = 5.00 L

The bucket originally contained 5.00 L of water.

Answer:

Classifications would include

Rational; Fraction; Can be turned into Decimal; Positive

Those would be classifications

Answer: rational number, 0.375

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

isosceles

Step-by-step explanation:

"we dont gaf abt no bii, we dont giveeaf abt no bii and if i was you i wouldnt kiss her on the lips"

Answer:

a) The population population in this situation is all the local business

b) The sample is the 80 of local business selected.

c) The rate of nonresponse is 42.5%.

Step-by-step explanation:

Sampling

This is a common statistics practice, when we want to study something from a population, we find a sample of this population.

For example:

I want to estimate the proportion of New York state residents who are Buffalo Bills fans. So i ask, lets say, 1000 randomly selected New York state residents wheter they are Buffalo Bills fans, and expand this to the entire population of New York State residents.

The population for this survey is all New York State residents, while the sample are the 1000 New York State residents.

From telephone book listings, the committee chooses 80 businesses at random.

Survey: 80 businesses.

Population: All businesses in the college town.

Then

a) What is the population for this sample survey?

The population population in this situation is all the local business

b) What is the sample?

The sample is the 80 of local business selected.

c) What is the rate (percent) of nonresponse?

80 - 46 = 34 non-responses, out of 80

34/80 = 0.425

0.425*100 = 42.5%

The rate of nonresponse is 42.5%.

Answer:

Relative frequency:

[tex]\text{Pilot error}=415/1370=0.30\\\\\text{Other human error}=96/1370=0.07\\\\\text{Weather}=169/1370=0.12\\\\\text{Mechanical problems}=622/1370=0.45\\\\\text{Sabotage}=68/1370=0.05\\\\[/tex]

The most serious threat to aviation safety is, according to this data, "mechanical failures". It can be improved by more rigorous inspection and better maintenance policies and execution.

Step-by-step explanation:

We have the data for fatal plane crashes. The sum of plane crashes is

We can calculate the relative frequency as:

[tex]\text{Pilot error}=415/1370=0.30\\\\\text{Other human error}=96/1370=0.07\\\\\text{Weather}=169/1370=0.12\\\\\text{Mechanical problems}=622/1370=0.45\\\\\text{Sabotage}=68/1370=0.05\\\\[/tex]

We can see that the most frequent cause is "mechanical problems", with a relative frequency of 0.45.

Answer:

100 inches Over 1 minute times × 1 foot Over 12 inches

Step by Step explanation

Remember that

1ft=12in

The expression converts 100 inches per minute to feet per minute is

100 inch / min x 1 ft/ 12 inch.

The same attribute is expressed using a unit conversion, but in a different unit of measurement. Time can be expressed in minutes rather than hours, and distance can be expressed in miles, kilometres, feet, or any other measurement unit.

We know

1 feet = 12 inch

We have to convert 100 inches per minute to feet per minute.

So, 100 inches

= 100 inch / min x 1 ft/ 12 inch

= 8.33 ft per minute

Learn more about Unit conversion here:

https://brainly.in/question/15169259

#SPJ2

Answer:

18

Step-by-step explanation:

Let x represent the years ago

103-x = 5(35-x)

103-x = 175 +5x

4x = 72

x = 18

Answer:

x = 15, AOB = 15, BOC = 165

Step-by-step explanation:

Assume that this is a straight line

2x - 15 + 11x = 180

Combine like terms

13x - 15 = 180

Add 15 on both sides

13x = 195

Divide 13 on both sides

x = 15

Substitute x for 15 in both equations

2(15) - 15 = 15

11(15) = 165

(For checking purposes, 165 + 15 = 180)

Answer:

x > -4

Step-by-step explanation:

— 3х + 7 < 19

Subtract 7 from each side

— 3х + 7-7 < 19-7

-3x < 12

Divide each side by -3, remembering to flip the inequality

-3x/-3 > 12/-3

x > -4

Just like any of your two-step equations, in this inequality,

start by isolating the x term which in this case is -3x by

subtracting 7 from both sides.

This gives us -3x < 12.

Solving from here, we divide both sides by -3.

However, when solving inequalities, you need to watch out.

When you divide both sides of an inequality by a negative number, you must switch the direction of the inequality sign.

Please give this idea your full attention. Even the most advanced algebra students will sometimes forget to switch the direction of the inequality sign when dividing both sides of an inequality by a negative.

So we end up with x > -4.

Answer:

2.5

Step-by-step explanation:

We have that the standardized mortality ratio (SMR) is the relationship between the number of deaths observed in a year, that is, those that occurred and the number of expected deaths, that is, those that were predicted.

SMR = observed / expected

therefore if we replace we have:

SMR = 4500/1800

SMR = 2.5

Which means that the standardized mortality ratio (SMR) is 2.5

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

a) image attached

b) Lets do the analysis in R , the complete R snippet is as follows

x<- c(89,177,189,354,362,442,965)

y<- c(.4,.6,.48,.66,.61,.69,.99)

# scatterplot

plot(x,y, col="red",pch=16)

# model

fit <- lm(y~x)

summary(fit)

#equation is

#y = 0.4041 + 0.0006211*X

# beta coeffiecients are

fit$coefficients

coef(summary(fit))[, "Std. Error"]

# confidence interval of slope

confint(fit, 'x', level=0.95)

The results are

> summary(fit)

Call:

lm(formula = y ~ x)

Residuals:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

-0.05940 0.08595 -0.04151 0.03602 -0.01895 0.01136 -0.01346

Coefficients:

Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)

(Intercept) 4.041e-01 3.459e-02 11.684 8.07e-05 ***

x 6.211e-04 7.579e-05 8.195 0.00044 ***

---

Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1

Residual standard error: 0.05405 on 5 degrees of freedom

Multiple R-squared: 0.9307,   Adjusted R-squared: 0.9168 # model is able to capture 93% of the variation of the data

F-statistic: 67.15 on 1 and 5 DF, p-value: 0.0004403 , p value is less than 0.05 , hence model as a whole is significant

> fit$coefficients

(Intercept) x

0.4041237853 0.0006210758

> coef(summary(fit))[, "Std. Error"]

(Intercept) x

3.458905e-02 7.579156e-05

> confint(fit, 'x', level=0.95)

2.5 % 97.5 %

x 0.0004262474 0.0008159042

c)

> x=c(89,177,189,354,362,442,965)

> y=c(0.40,0.60,0.48,0.66,0.61,0.69,0.99)

>

> ### linear model

> model=lm(y~x)

> summary(model)

Call:

lm(formula = y ~ x)

Residuals:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

-0.05940 0.08595 -0.04151 0.03602 -0.01895 0.01136 -0.01346

Coefficients:

Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)    

(Intercept) 4.041e-01 3.459e-02 11.684 8.07e-05 ***

x 6.211e-04 7.579e-05 8.195 0.00044 ***

---

Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1

Residual standard error: 0.05405 on 5 degrees of freedom

Multiple R-squared: 0.9307, Adjusted R-squared: 0.9168

F-statistic: 67.15 on 1 and 5 DF, p-value: 0.0004403

s_e is the Residual standard error from the model and its estimated value is 0.05405. s_e is the standard deviation of the model.  

d) 95% confidence interval

> confint(model, confidence=0.95)

2.5 % 97.5 %

(Intercept) 0.3152097913 0.4930377793

x 0.0004262474 0.0008159042

Comment: The estimated confidence interval of slope of x does not include zero. Hence, x has the significant effect on y at 0.05 level of significance.

 e)

> predict(model, newdata=data.frame(x=250), interval="confidence", level=0.95)

fit lwr upr

1 0.5593927 0.5020485 0.616737

f)

> predict.lm(model, newdata=data.frame(x=250), interval="prediction", level=0.95)

fit lwr upr

1 0.5593927 0.4090954 0.7096901

Answer:

The 95% confidence interval for the difference of means is (7.67, 16.33).

The estimate is Md = 12.

The standard error is sM_d = 2.176.

Step-by-step explanation:

We have to calculate a 95% confidence interval for the difference between means.

The sample 1 (this year's sales), of size n1=36 has a mean of 53 and a standard deviation of 12.

The sample 2 (last year's sales), of size n2=49 has a mean of 41 and a standard deviation of 6.

The difference between sample means is Md=12.

[tex]M_d=M_1-M_2=53-41=12[/tex]

The estimated standard error of the difference between means is computed using the formula:

[tex]s_{M_d}=\sqrt{\dfrac{\sigma_1^2}{n_1}+\dfrac{\sigma_2^2}{n_2}}=\sqrt{\dfrac{12^2}{36}+\dfrac{6^2}{49}}\\\\\\s_{M_d}=\sqrt{4+0.735}=\sqrt{4.735}=2.176[/tex]

The degrees of freedom are:

[tex]df=n_1+n_2-1=36+49-2=83[/tex]

The critical t-value for a 95% confidence interval and 83 degrees of fredom is t=1.989.

The margin of error (MOE) can be calculated as:

[tex]MOE=t \cdot s_{M_d}=1.989 \cdot 2.176=4.328[/tex]

Then, the lower and upper bounds of the confidence interval are:

[tex]LL=M_d-t \cdot s_{M_d} = 12-4.328=7.67\\\\UL=M_d+t \cdot s_{M_d} = 12+4.328=16.33[/tex]

The 95% confidence interval for the difference of means is (7.67, 16.33).

Answer:

The resultant polynomial is: [tex]6x^2-6x+5[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

We need to subtract [tex](x+1)^{2}[/tex] from [tex]7x^2-4x+6[/tex]

so, we start by performing the multiplication involved in the perfect square of the binomial [tex](x+1)[/tex], and obtain its expression in separate terms that can be combined:

[tex](x+1)^{2}=(x+1)\,(x+1)=x^2+x+x+1=x^2+2x+1[/tex]

Now we can subtract this trinomial from  [tex]7x^2-4x+6[/tex], and  combining like terms to get the resultant polynomial expression:

[tex]7x^2-4x+6-(x^2+2x+1)=7x^2-4x+6-x^2-2x-1=7x^2-x^2-4x-2x+6-1=6x^2-6x+5[/tex]

Then the resultant polynomial is: [tex]6x^2-6x+5[/tex]

Answer:

1. More pollination process in the regular corn planted in field A than that of field B.

2. Low pest and insect attack on corn planted in field A compared to that of B.

Step-by-step explanation:

1. Pollination is the process in which a plant becomes fertilized, so as to produced seeds. The process requires some agent which could be; air, human, wind etc.

Therefore more pollination of the corn planted in field A than those in B would lead to more yield (ears of corn harvested) than that of B.

2. Pests and insects are agents which could reduce the yield of the corn after harvest. Comparing the two fields A and B, if the corn planted in field A were not affected by pests or insects, while those planted in B were affected, then more ears of corn would be harvested in field A.

Answer:

a,c, And gg gamer

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Option A

Step-by-step explanation:

Correlation does not imply causality. Correlation shows whether and how strongly pairs of variables are related.

Causality shows a situation between two events where one event is affected by the other

We would be skeptical of this survey because it is very difficult to assume that people who owned a radio were more likely to be declared insane and put into an insane asylum as listening to the radio cannot cause insanity unless proven.

Answer:

A. -6 ≤ y ≤ 9

Step-by-step explanation:

→Looking at the graphed function, you can see that the line starts at when y = -6. Then the function slowly increases, until it finally stops when y = 9.

→This means that the range (y-values) of the function can be from -6 through 9.

The correct answer should be "A. -6 ≤ y ≤ 9."

Answer:

The 7 is in the hundredths place.

The 3 is in the ones place.

3.872 is equivalent to (3 × 1) + (8 × 0.1) + (7 × 0.01) + (2 × 0.001).

Step-by-step explanation:

Given the number 3.872, to check all the given options that are true apply to the number, let's take a look at each position occupied by each digit. In order words, let's consider their place value.

Thus,

The 3 is in the ones place and as such has a value of 3.

8 is in the tenths place having a place value of 0.8 (⁸/10)

7 is in the hundredths place having a place value of 0.07 (⁷/100)

2 is in the thousandths place having a place value of 0.002 (²/1000)

Going by these, the following statements are true :

"The 7 is in the hundredths place."

"The 3 is in the ones place."

"3.872 is equivalent to (3 × 1) + (8 × 0.1) + (7 × 0.01) + (2 × 0.001)."

The number is pronounced as three and eight hundred seventy-two thousandths rather than the option given.

Therefore, only 3 if the options are correct

Answer: The 7 is in the hundredths place.

The 3 is in the ones place.

3.872 is equivalent to (3 × 1) + (8 × 0.1) + (7 × 0.01) + (2 × 0.001).

Step-by-step explanation:

In the question, 3 is in the ones place. The first number after the decimal point is the tenths. In the question, the place value of 8 is 8 tenths; 7 is in the hundredths place.

3.872 = (3 × 1) + (8 × 0.1) + (7 × 0.01) + (2 × 0.001)

= 3 + 0.8 + 0.07 + 0.002

= 3.872

The number is pronounced as three and eight hundred seventy-two thousandths

Answer:

B and F

Step-by-step explanation:

When we'll slice a triangular prism, a square and triangle would be formed

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

No Solutions

There will be no solutions when the left side is inconsistent with the right side:

  2x +5 +2x +3x = 7x +1

  7x +5 = 7x +1 . . . . . . no value of x will make this true

__

One Solution

There will be one solution when the left side and right side are not inconsistent and not the same.

  2x +5 +2x +3x = 6x +1

  7x +5 = 6x +1

  x = -4 . . . . . . . . add -6x-5 to both sides

__

Infinitely Many Solutions

There will be an infinite number of solutions when the equation is true for any value of x. This will be the case when the left side and right side are identical.

  2x +5 +2x +3x = 7x +5

  7x +5 = 7x +5 . . . . . true for all values of x

_____

Comment on these solutions

You have not provided the contents of any of the drop-down menus, so we cannot say for certain what the answers should be--except in the case of "infinitely many solutions." For "no solutions", the coefficient of x must be 7 and the constant must not be 5. For "one solution" the coefficient of x cannot be 7, and the constant can be anything.

Answer:

No Solutions: 7x+1

One Solution: 6x+1

Infinitely Many Solutions: 7x+5

Answer:

it´s b

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

50 = p + 42

Step-by-step explanation:

The unknown part of this equation is the variable p, the number of people that left. So you want to add p to 42 and that will give you the total number of football players, which is 50. In order to get p, you need to get it by itself and make it equal something. Subtract 42 from both sides and you are stuck with 50-42 = p

p = 8

Answer:

50-p=42

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

The number of students who scored within 2 standard deviations of the mean is 380.

Step-by-step explanation:

The Empirical Rule states that, for a normally distributed random variable:

68% of the measures are within 1 standard deviation of the mean.

95% of the measures are within 2 standard deviation of the mean.

99.7% of the measures are within 3 standard deviations of the mean.

The number of students who scored within 2  standard deviations of the mean is approximately

By the Empirical Rule, 95% of the students scored within 2 standard deviations of the mean

Out of 400

0.95*400 = 380

The number of students who scored within 2 standard deviations of the mean is 380.

Answer: 380

Step-by-step explanation: 95% of 400 is 380

Answer:

The answer is option 1.

Step-by-step explanation:

You have to apply Tangent Rule, tanθ = opposite/adjacent:

[tex] \tan(θ) = \frac{oppo.}{adj.} [/tex]

[tex]let \: oppo. = 5 \\ let \: adj. = b \\ let \: θ = 30[/tex]

[tex] \tan(30) = \frac{5}{b} [/tex]

The correct answer is option (A) tan(30)=5/b

The steps are as follow:

AB = 10 cm

BC = 5 cm

AC = b cm

tan(x) = opposite side / adjacent side

tan(30) = BC / AC

tan(30) = 5 / b

So, the correct answer is option (A) tan(30)=5/b

Learn more about Tangent function here:

https://brainly.com/question/6904750

#SPJ2

This point is below both the red diagonal line and the blue parabola. We know that the set of solution points is below both due to the "less than" parts of each inequality sign.  

In contrast, a point like (2,2) is above the parabola which is why it is not a solution. It does not make the inequality [tex]y \le x^2-3x[/tex] true. So this is why we can rule choice A out.

Choice C is not a solution because (4,1) does not make [tex]y \le -x+3[/tex] true. This point is not below the red diagonal line. We can cross choice C off the list.

Choice D is similar to choice A, which is why we can rule it out as well.

Answer:  0.0003

Step-by-step explanation:  Solution for fraction 3/10000 to decimal conversion

In the given, we want to convert 3 / 10000 to decimal form, we can compute this by dividing numerator 3 by denominator 10000

3/10000 = 0.0003