What is the Square root of 30 ,12,36

Answer:

9

Step-by-step explanation:

Divide 6 by 2:

3(1+2)

Add 1 and 2:

3 x 3

Multiply 3 by 3:

3 x 3 = 9

Answer:

1

Step-by-step explanation:

6

------

2(1+2)

6

-----

2(3)

6

-----

6

1

Answer:

x = 20.8

y = 22.3

Step-by-step explanation:

tan(21) = 8/x

or, x = 8/tan(21)

or, x = 20.8 (rounded to the nearest tenth)

sin(21) = 8/y

or, y = 8/sin(21)

or, y = 22.3 (rounded to the nearest tenth)

Answered by GAUTHMATH

Answer:

Graph C.

*See attachment below

Step-by-step explanation:

A graph that shows a set of ordered pairs representing a function would have each x-value being plotted against only one y-value. That is, every x-value must have exactly one y-value. Every x-value must not have more than 1 y-value being plotted against it.

The graph that shows this is the graph in option as shown in the attachment below.

Answer:

880 ft.

Step-by-step explanation:

First! We have to establish how many feet the car travels per hour.

60 (number of miles per hour) x 5280 (number of feet in a mile) = 316,800 (number of feet in an hour)

Next, since we know that there are 60 minutes in an hour we are going to divide our "number of feet in an hour" by 60 to get the "number of feet in a minute"

316,800 ÷ 60 = 5280

Once again, we are going to divide our "number of feet in a minute" by 60 to get the "number of feet per second".

5280 ÷ 60 = 88

Finally! We will multiple our "number of feet per second" by 10 to get how many feet the car can travel in 10 seconds.

88 × 10 = 880

So! Our car can travel 880 feet in 10 seconds.

Hope this Helps! :)

Have any questions? Ask below in the comments and I will try my best to answer.

-SGO

Answer:

= 6 ways = Required number of ways = (120×6)=720

Answer:

A. A critical value is how far away our sample statistic can be from the true population parameter with a certain level of confidence.

Step-by-step explanation:

Test of a hypothesis:

When we are testing a hypothesis, we have a null hypothesis and an alternative hypothesis, and the conclusion depends on the test statistic, given by:

[tex]z = \frac{X - \mu}{\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}}[/tex]

In which X is the sample mean, [tex]\mu[/tex] is the value tested at the null hypothesis, [tex]\sigma[/tex] is the standard deviation and n is the size of the sample.

The test statistic measures the number of standard errors that we have to move away from the sample mean, and the critical value is how much we can be far from the population parameter with a certain level of confidence, that is, before a certain value we do not reject the null hypothesis, after the value we reject, and this value is the critical value, and thus the correct answer is given by option a.

Answer:

It will take 364 days

Step-by-step explanation:

First, convert:

1 meter = 100 cm

14.56 meters = 1456 cm

1456 cm is how tall it is at the end, to find out how many days it takes to grow, divide 1456 by 4 (how much it grows every day).

1456/4 = 364 days

The number of days to grow by 14.56 meters is 364 days.

Expression in maths is defined as the collection of the numbers variables and functions by using signs like addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division.

Numbers (constants), variables, operations, functions, brackets, punctuation, and grouping can all be represented by mathematical symbols, which can also be used to indicate the logical syntax's order of operations and other features.

The number of days to grow is 14.56 meters will be calculated as:-

1 meter = 100 cm

14.56 meters = 1456 cm

1456 cm is how tall it is at the end, to find out how many days it takes to grow, divide 1456 by 4 (how much it grows every day).

1456/4 = 364 days

Therefore, the number of days will be 364.

To know more about Expression follow

https://brainly.com/question/723406

#SPJ5

Answer:

what is the question man

Answer:

hhhhjhgbbbjjhjjjjjkkkkkkkk

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Q1. Sobey's is the best deal

In Food Basics, having the two loaves of bread costing 4.88 would mean that (4.88 / 2) one would cost 2.44.

To find out how much three would cost, multiply 2.44 by three, and the result is 7.32, which is higher than the three loves of bread that costs 7.20 in Sobey's, which Sobey's has a better deal. 7.20 / 3 = 2.40, yet Food Basics does cost higher by 4 cents for just one.

I am not too sure about question 2, but I do hope the above question helps!

Answer:

18

Step-by-step explanation:

Because angle A and C are equal, it is an isoceles traingle.

This means that side BA is equal to side BC.

Thus, you can set 6x equal to 3x + 9.

Solving that gives you x = 3.

6(3) = 18    3(3) +9 = 18

Answer:

B. 18

Step-by-step explanation:

Since angles A and C are congruent, then sides BA and BC are congruent.

6x = 3x + 9

3x = 9

x = 3

AB = 6x = 6(3) = 18

Answer: B. 18

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

3(x + 2) > x

3x + 6 > x

3x - 3x + 6 > x - 3x

6 > -2x

6/-2 < -2x/-2

-3< x

Let the width = x

The length would be 4x-27

Area = length x width

2790 = (4x-27) * x

Expand:

2790 = 4x^2 - 27x

Subtract 2790 from both sides:

4x^2 - 27x - 2790 = 0

Use the quadratic formula to solve for the positive value of x:

X = -(-27) + sqrt(-27^2 -4*4(-2790)) /(2*4)

X = 30

Now replace x with 30 in the lengths:

Width = x = 30 inches

Length = 4x -27 = 4(30) -27 = 120-27 = 93 inches

Answer:

0.9319 = 93.19% probability that at least 88 out of 153 registered voters will vote in the presidential election.

Step-by-step explanation:

Binomial probability distribution

Probability of exactly x successes on n repeated trials, with p probability.

Can be approximated to a normal distribution, using the expected value and the standard deviation.

The expected value of the binomial distribution is:

[tex]E(X) = np[/tex]

The standard deviation of the binomial distribution is:

[tex]\sqrt{V(X)} = \sqrt{np(1-p)}[/tex]

Normal probability distribution

Problems of normally distributed distributions can be solved using the z-score formula.

In a set with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]\sigma[/tex], the zscore of a measure X is given by:

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

The Z-score measures how many standard deviations the measure is from the mean. After finding the Z-score, we look at the z-score table and find the p-value associated with this z-score. This p-value is the probability that the value of the measure is smaller than X, that is, the percentile of X. Subtracting 1 by the pvalue, we get the probability that the value of the measure is greater than X.

When we are approximating a binomial distribution to a normal one, we have that [tex]\mu = E(X)[/tex], [tex]\sigma = \sqrt{V(X)}[/tex].

153 voters:

This means that [tex]n = 153[/tex]

Assume the probability that a given registered voter will vote in the presidential election is 63%.

This means that [tex]p = 0.63[/tex]

Mean and standard deviation:

[tex]\mu = E(X) = np = 153(0.63) = 96.39[/tex]

[tex]\sigma = \sqrt{V(X)} = \sqrt{np(1-p)} = \sqrt{153*0.63*0.37} = 5.97[/tex]

Consider the probability that at least 88 out of 153 registered voters will vote in the presidential election.

Using continuity correction, this is: [tex]P(X \geq 88 - 0.5) = P(X \geq 87.5)[/tex], which is 1 subtracted by the p-value of Z when X = 87.5.

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

[tex]Z = \frac{87.5 - 96.39}{5.97}[/tex]

[tex]Z = -1.49[/tex]

[tex]Z = -1.49[/tex] has a p-value of 0.0681.

1 - 0.0681 = 0.9319

0.9319 = 93.19% probability that at least 88 out of 153 registered voters will vote in the presidential election.

Answer:

b

Step-by-step explanation:

i had it

Answer:

Hence we do not have enough evidence to conclude that a liquid diet caused more weight loss.

Step-by-step explanation:

Here the answer is given as follows,

Answer:

182/3,3 8/3, 152/3

Step-by-step explanation:

a+b+c=124

a trừ c=  10

4b=c

Answer:

a=29,b=79,c=19

Step-by-step explanation:

a=c+10

b=4c

=> a+b+c=c+10+4c+c=124

=> c=19

=> a= 29, b=79

Answer:

MD = 2

SS = 18

SAMPLE VARIANCE = 2.25

STANDARD ERROR = 0.5

Step-by-step explanation:

Given :

A 8 7

B 7 5

C 6 6

D 7 6

E 9 7

F 8 5

G 5 4

H 9 4

I 7 4

Difference, d = Before - After

______ d

A 8 7 __ 1

B 7 5 __ 2

C 6 6 __ 0

D 7 6 __ 1

E 9 7 __ 2

F 8 5 __ 3

G 5 4 __ 1

H 9 4 __5

I 7 4 ___3

The mean of difference, MD ;

MD = Σd/ n = (1+2+0+1+2+3+1+5+3) / 9 = 18 / 9 = 2

The sum of square, SS ;

(1 - 2)^2 + (2 - 2)^2 + (0 - 2)^2 + (1 - 2)^2 + (2 - 2)^2 + (3 - 2)^2 + (1 - 2)^2 + (5 - 2)^2 + (3 - 2)^2 = 18

Sample variance, S² = SS/(N-1) = 18 / (9 - 1) = 18 / 8 = 2.25

Sample standard deviation, S = √Variance = √2.25 = 1.5

Standard Error, S.E = S / √n = 1.5 / √9 = 0.5

Test statistic : MD / S.E = 2 / 0.5 = 4

We test at α = 0.05 since no α - value is stated in the question.

Critical value at 0.05, df = 8 ;

Critical value = 2.306

Since; Test statistic > Critical value, then result is significant at α = 0.05

Answer:

The answer is "[tex]7.21 \times 10^{37}[/tex]".

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]\to ^{n}_{C_r}=\frac{n!}{r!(n-r)!}[/tex]

       [tex]=^{66}_{C_{33}} \times ^{66}_{C_{22}} \times ^{55}_{C_{1}} \\\\=\frac{66!}{33! (66-33)!} \times \frac{66!}{22! (66-22)!} \times \frac{55!}{1! (55-1)!}\\\\=\frac{66!}{33! (33)!} \times \frac{66!}{22! (44)!} \times \frac{55!}{1! (54)!}\\\\=\frac{66!}{33! (33)!} \times \frac{66!}{22! (44)!} \times \frac{55\times 54!}{1! (54)!}\\\\=\frac{66!}{33! (33)!} \times \frac{66!}{22! (44)!} \times 55\\\\= 7219428434016265740 \times 182183167981760400\times 55\\\\[/tex]

       [tex]= 7.21 \times 10^{18} \times 1.82\times10^{17}\times 55\\\\= 7.21 \times 10^{35} \times 1.82\times 55\\\\=721.721 \times 10^{35}\\\\=7.21\times 10^{37}[/tex]

Answer:

a) To show that we can use the 1 proportion z-interval, we know that 250 ( size sample) is big enough to approximate the binomial distribution ( tolerance-intolerance) to a normal distribution.

b) See step by step explanation

CI 90 %  =  (  0,296 ; 0,392)

c) We can support that with 90 % of confidence we will find the random variable between this interval ( 0,296 ; 0,392)

d) the CI 95 % will be wider

Step-by-step explanation:

Sample Information:

Sample size n  =  250

number of people with milk intolerance  x = 86

p₁  =  86 / 250    p₁ = 0.344    and   q₁ =  1  - p₁   q₁ = 0,656

To calculate 90 % of Confidence Interval   α = 10%  α/2 = 5 %  

α/2 = 0,05     z(c) from z-table is:  z(c) =  1.6

Then:

CI 90 %  =  (  p₁  ±  z(c) * SE )

SE =  √ (p₁*q₁)/n   =  √ 0,225664/250

SE = 0,03

CI 90 %  =  (  0,344  ±  1,6* 0,03 )

CI 90 %  =  (  0,344 - 0,048 ;  0,344 + 0,048)

b) CI 90 %  =  (  0,296 ; 0,392)

a) To show that we can use the 1 proportion z-interval, we know that 250 ( size sample) is big enough to approximate the binomial distribution ( tolerance-intolerance) to a normal distribution.

c) We can support that with 90 % of confidence we will find the random variable between  this interval (  0,296 ; 0,392) .

d) CI 95 %      then significance level α = 5 %   α/2 = 2.5 %  

α/2  =  0,025      z(c) = 1.96   from z-table

SE = 0,03

And  as 1.96 > 1.6    the CI 95 % will be wider

CI 95% =  ( 0,344 ±  1.96*0,03 )

CI 95% =  (  0,344 ± 0,0588 )

CI 95% =  ( 0,2852 ; 0,4028 )

Answer:

Since, mean of 200 items was 50 and number of items =200

So, mean =50

Also, we know mean = number of itemssum of items

∴50=200sum of items

Sum of items = 200×50=10000

Later on, it was discovered that the two items were misread as 92 and 8 instead of 192 and 88 respectively

Then  misread         instead         Correct item

             92                   192              192-92=100

              8                     88               88-8=80

∴ Correct sum of items =10000+180=10180

∴ Correct mean = number of items/sum of items

=10180/200 =50.9

Answer:

Hello,

203.6

Step-by-step explanation:

Sum of the item first= 50*200=10000

new sum is 10000+(192-92)+(88-8)=10180

New mean=10180/200=50.9

Answer:

ratio of water and milk=2:3

i.e. water=2

milk=3

now adding 1 liter of water in 2

2+1=3

and 1 liter of milk in 3

3+1=4

hence,

the new ratio is 3:4

Step-by-step explanation:

i hope this will help

plz mark as brainliest

I believe the question is:

What is the solution to 5x + 1 +9 - 3

In this case, we solve for X.

5x + 1 + 9 - 3

5x + 10 - 3

5x + 7

5x = -7

x = -7/5

Unfortunately, It is not one of the answer choices it looks like.

Maybe you should reword your question but hopefully this is correct.

If you meant to say 5x+1 + 9 < 3 --> 5x + 10 < 3 --> 5x < -7 --> x < -7/5

The value of x in a given expression is -7/5.

We have given that,

5x + 1 + 9 - 3

We have to determine the value of x.

A variable is any factor, trait, or condition that can exist in differing amounts or types. Scientists try to figure out how the natural world works

In this case, we solve for X.

5x + 1 + 9 - 3

5x + 10 - 3

5x + 7

5x = -7

x = -7/5

If you meant to say 5x+1 + 9 < 3 --> 5x + 10 < 3 --> 5x < -7 --> x < -7/5.

Therefore we get the value of x is -7/5.

To learn more about the value of the variable visit:

https://brainly.com/question/5030068

#SPJ2

Why is this? It's because each time x goes up by 2, y is also increasing by 2. The rate of change is constant. I'm treating n as x, and C as y.

Another way to see why we have a linear function is to pick any two points from that table, and apply the slope formula

m = (y2-y1)/(x2-x1)

You should find that no matter which two rows you pick, you should get a slope of 1.

Lastly, you can plot the three points from the table to find they all are on the same straight line as shown below. So there are at least 3 different ways to justify choice B as the answer.

Side note: The equation of the line is y = x-7, which then translates over to C = n-7.

Answer:

0.5555 = 55.55% probability that Max will get the job.

Step-by-step explanation:

What is the probability that Max will get the job?

The sum of all probabilities is 100% = 1, so, considering Max's probability as x:

[tex]x + \frac{1}{3} + \frac{1}{9} = 1[/tex]

[tex]\frac{9x + 3 + 1}{9} = 1[/tex]

[tex]9x + 4 = 9[/tex]

[tex]9x = 5[/tex]

[tex]x = \frac{5}{9}[/tex]

[tex]x = 0.5555[/tex]

0.5555 = 55.55% probability that Max will get the job.

The max has probability of getting this job is x= 0.5555 and 55.55%

Suppose that ;

Max has probability of getting this job is = x

and other two companies have probability to get job is [tex]\frac{1}{3} or \frac{1}{9}[/tex].

Sum of the probability have bid a job is 100% which is equal to 1.

According to given question ;

Sum of all the companies having probability to get the job = 1

[tex]x + \frac{1}{3} + \frac{1}{9} = 1[/tex]

[tex]\frac{9.x+1.3+1.1}{9} = 1\\9x+3+1 = 9.1\\9x+4 =9\\9x = 9-4\\9x = 5\\x = \frac{5}{9}[/tex]

x = 0.5555

The Max has probability of getting this job is x= 0.5555 or 55.55%

For the more information about probability click the link given below

https://brainly.com/question/14210034

Answer:

Part 1)

See Below.

Part 2)

[tex]\displaystyle (-0.179, -0.178) \cup (-0.010, 0.012)[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Part 1)

The linear approximation L for a function f at the point x = a is given by:

[tex]\displaystyle L \approx f'(a)(x-a) + f(a)[/tex]

We want to verify that the expression:

[tex]1-36x[/tex]

Is the linear approximation for the function:

[tex]\displaystyle f(x) = \frac{1}{(1+9x)^4}[/tex]

At x = 0.

So, find f'(x). We can use the chain rule:

[tex]\displaystyle f'(x) = -4(1+9x)^{-4-1}\cdot (9)[/tex]

Simplify. Hence:

[tex]\displaystyle f'(x) = -\frac{36}{(1+9x)^{5}}[/tex]

Then the slope of the linear approximation at x = 0 will be:

[tex]\displaystyle f'(1) = -\frac{36}{(1+9(0))^5} = -36[/tex]

And the value of the function at x = 0 is:

[tex]\displaystyle f(0) = \frac{1}{(1+9(0))^4} = 1[/tex]

Thus, the linear approximation will be:

[tex]\displaystyle L = (-36)(x-(0)) + 1 = 1 - 36x[/tex]

Hence verified.

Part B)

We want to determine the values of x for which the linear approximation L is accurate to within 0.1.

In other words:

[tex]\displaystyle \left| f(x) - L(x) \right | \leq 0.1[/tex]

By definition:

[tex]\displaystyle -0.1\leq f(x) - L(x) \leq 0.1[/tex]

Therefore:

[tex]\displaystyle -0.1 \leq \left(\frac{1}{(1+9x)^4} \right) - (1-36x) \leq 0.1[/tex]

We can solve this by using a graphing calculator. Please refer to the graph shown below.

We can see that the inequality is true (i.e. the graph is between y = 0.1 and y = -0.1) for x values between -0.179 and -0.178 as well as -0.010 and 0.012.

In interval notation:

[tex]\displaystyle (-0.179, -0.178) \cup (-0.010, 0.012)[/tex]

Bola will be 8 years old.

Let Bola's age be x

Dada's age be y

Ayo's age be z

If the sum of ages of Bola, Dada, and Ayo is 32 years, then;

x + y + z = 32

If they share a sum of money in the ratio of their ages, then the ratio of their ages will be x: y: z

Also if Bola gets N400, Dada get-N400 and Ayo get N800, then the total amount of money shared will be expressed as:

T = 400 + 400 + 800

T = N1600

Next is to get the age of Bola

[tex]\frac{age \ of \ bola}{32}* Total \ amount \ shared = Bola's \ Share[/tex]

Substitute the required variables and values into the formula;

[tex]\frac{x}{32}*1600= 400\\50x=400\\x=\frac{400}{50}\\x=8[/tex]

This shows that Bola is 8 years old

Learn more on ratio here: https://brainly.com/question/19473677

Answer:

First one: 2.5

Second: -6

8.5+69.5(5) = 147.5

150 - 147.5 = 2.5

8.5 + 69.5(5) = 356

350 - 356 = -6

ED2021

The residual for 2 phone lines is $2.5.

The residual for 5 phone lines is -$6.

The residual is the vertical distance separating the observed point from your expected y-value, or more simply put, it is the difference between the actual y and the predicted y.

In the question, we are asked to find the residual for 2 and 5 lines using the least-squares regression equation y = 8.5 + 69.5x and the actual costs given to us.

We know that the residual is the vertical distance separating the observed point from your expected y-value, or more simply put, it is the difference between the actual y and the predicted y.

Thus for 2 phone lines:-

Actual Cost = $150.

Predicted Cost, y = 8.5 + 69.5*2 = 147.5.

Residual = Actual Cost - Predicted Cost = 150 - 147.5 = $2.5.

Thus, the residual for 2 phone lines is $2.5.

Thus for 5 phone lines:-

Actual Cost = $350.

Predicted Cost, y = 8.5 + 69.5*2 = 356.

Residual = Actual Cost - Predicted Cost = 350 - 356 = -$6.

Thus, the residual for 2 phone lines is -$6.

Learn more about the residual in a least-square regression equation at

https://brainly.com/question/20165292

#SPJ2