What should I write down for each empty, the question for each column is Why it was important or how it led to the fall of the Soviet Union

Answer: Power dynamics and a class system

Explanation: Sources from Brainly suggest this- was the power and how much you had and also you were divided in soceity

There are a few different ideas or theories about why people believed that President Lincoln asked to see John W. Booth on the night of his assassination.
One theory is that this rumor may have started because Booth was known to be a well-known actor, and Lincoln was said to have enjoyed attending the theater. Another theory suggests that some people may have believed that Lincoln and Booth knew each other personally, although there is no evidence to support this claim. It's also worth pointing out that there were many rumors and false stories circulating in the aftermath of Lincoln's assassination, and it's possible that the idea that Lincoln had requested to see Booth was simply one of many unsubstantiated claims.

Answer: The Black Panther Party and Martin Luther King Jr. had different approaches to race relations and visions of the future.

The Black Panther Party was a revolutionary socialist organization that emerged in the 1960s with the goal of fighting against systemic racism and oppression of Black people in the United States. They believed in the use of armed self-defense to protect their communities from police brutality and other forms of violence, and they sought to build a coalition of oppressed people across racial and ethnic lines to challenge the status quo. The Black Panther Party's vision of the future was a socialist society that provided basic needs and resources to all people, regardless of race or class.

On the other hand, Martin Luther King Jr. was a civil rights leader who advocated for nonviolent resistance to segregation and discrimination against Black people. He believed in the power of love and peaceful protest to effect change, and he worked to build a coalition of people of all races to fight for civil rights. King's vision of the future was a society where people of all races were treated with dignity and respect, and where the principles of justice, equality, and freedom were upheld.

While both the Black Panther Party and Martin Luther King Jr. were committed to fighting against racism and oppression of Black people, they had different approaches to achieving this goal and different visions of the future. The Black Panther Party was more radical and revolutionary in their tactics and vision, while King was more focused on nonviolent resistance and building a coalition of people of all races to achieve change.

A totem represents a clans ancestry. It is a symbol or emblem of a particular group of people, typically an animal or plant, that serves as a sacred or spiritual representation of their family or clan. The totem is often believed to have special powers or qualities that are associated with the group it represents, and is used in various ceremonies and rituals as a way of honoring and connecting with their ancestors.

Students from a teacher-training institution in the state of Guerrero were implicated in the event as they traveled to a demonstration in the neighboring city of Iguala. Local police stopped the students, who then opened fire on their buses, killing six people and wounding hundreds more. 43 students were then kidnapped by the police and have not been seen since.

The state is named after Vicente Guerrero, the second President of Mexico and one of the most prominent generals in the Mexican War of Independence.

It is the only teacher-training institution Mexican state with a presidential name. In 1849, the area from the states of Mexico, Puebla, and Michoacán was combined to form the current entity.

Learn more about  Guerrero , from :

brainly.com/question/28522542

#SPJ1

Two major schools of thought in contemporary philosophy are Analytic philosophy and Continental philosophy. These schools of thought have different origins, methodologies, and areas of focus, and have been characterized by some philosophers as having fundamental disagreements.

Analytic philosophy is a school of thought that emerged in the early 20th century and is mainly associated with British and American philosophy. It emphasizes clarity of thought, precision in language, and rigorous analysis of concepts and arguments.

Analytic philosophers often employ logical methods to analyze philosophical problems and prefer to use empirical evidence to support their arguments.

Continental philosophy, on the other hand, is a school of thought that originated in the 19th century on the European continent and is associated with philosophers such as Martin Heidegger, Jean-Paul Sartre, and Jacques Derrida.

Continental philosophers tend to focus on questions of meaning, identity, and the human condition. They emphasize the importance of context, historical and cultural background, and subjective experience in understanding philosophical problems.

In terms of the differences between these two schools of thought, one major area of disagreement is the role of language and its relation to reality.

In terms of which side I would take in this disagreement, I lean more towards the Continental philosophers. I believe that language is not just a neutral tool for describing reality, but is deeply embedded in our cultural.

That being said, I do not think that one school of thought is necessarily superior to the other. Both Analytic and Continental philosophy have made important contributions to the field, and there is much to be gained by engaging with both approaches.

Ultimately, I think that a more inclusive and interdisciplinary approach to philosophy can lead to a richer and more nuanced understanding of the world and our place in it.

for similar questions on schools of thought

https://brainly.com/question/10353624

#SPJ11

Answer:

William Shakespeare's tragedy "Hamlet" has been a source of insight and wisdom for centuries, and its themes continue to resonate with audiences today. The play offers several valuable life lessons, including the dangers of inaction, the complexities of morality, and the consequences of revenge.

One of the most prominent lessons from "Hamlet" is the danger of inaction. The play's protagonist, Hamlet, struggles with indecision and fails to take action throughout much of the story. His inaction ultimately leads to his downfall, as he is unable to prevent the deaths of several characters he cares about. Hamlet's hesitation is best exemplified in his famous soliloquy, in which he contemplates whether to take revenge against his uncle for murdering his father: "To be or not to be, that is the question." By the time he does decide to act, it is too late, and his own death is imminent.

Another life lesson from "Hamlet" is the complexity of morality. The play explores the idea that there are no clear-cut answers when it comes to questions of right and wrong. Hamlet is torn between his duty to avenge his father's death and his own moral qualms about committing murder. Even the villain of the play, Claudius, is shown to have moments of remorse and self-doubt, complicating the idea of a clear-cut villain. The play's most famous line, "Something is rotten in the state of Denmark," suggests that corruption and moral decay are pervasive and difficult to root out.

Finally, "Hamlet" offers a lesson about the consequences of revenge. While revenge may seem like a satisfying solution to a perceived wrong, the play suggests that it often leads to a cycle of violence and destruction. Hamlet's quest for revenge ultimately results in the deaths of nearly all the major characters in the play, including himself. By the end of the story, the stage is littered with bodies, and the audience is left to contemplate the futility of revenge.

In conclusion, "Hamlet" is a timeless work of literature that offers several valuable life lessons. Its exploration of inaction, morality, and revenge continues to resonate with audiences today, centuries after its initial publication. By examining the story of Hamlet and its characters, we can learn important lessons about the complexities of human behavior and the dangers of letting our emotions guide our actions.

The Qing dynasty of the ancient Chinese dynasties established the territorial state known as Zhongguo (or Middle Kingdom).

In the book, the Qing dynasty was frequently referred to as Zhongguo, or simply Zhong. After the Opium War (1839–1842), diplomatic relations with Western countries grew, and the Qing administration occasionally referred to itself in official documents as Zhongguo (or Zhong).

Because they thought China to be the center of the planet, the Chinese dubbed their country the Middle Kingdom. People have been referring to the state founded by the Han nationality as Zhongguo since the Han Dynasty (206BC-220AD), although other nationalities also refer to their own nations as Zhongguo.

Learn more about the Qing dynasty here:

https://brainly.com/question/30456154

#SPJ1

The exchange between Seigenthaler and Nash likely influenced events by bringing attention to the issue of inaccurate information on Wikipedia and the need for more effective measures to address it.

Seigenthaler's experience sparked a public conversation about the reliability of information on the internet and the role of online platforms in disseminating information. As a result, Wikipedia implemented changes to its editorial process to help prevent such incidents from occurring in the future.

The incident also highlighted the importance of fact-checking and the potential dangers of relying solely on online sources for information.

Learn more about Wikipedia here:

https://brainly.com/question/30280834

#SPJ1

Answer:

The Roman consuls headed the judicial branch of government, I think. The Roman consuls ruled for one year, and there were always two men ruling together at the same time. They did hold authority over the army and had enough power to basically run the government, so in a sense, it could be D too. B seems like the more likely one though.

Most of the people in Mongolia and Tibet are nomadic herders because land is a vast and expansive resource.

The geology and climate of these areas have a strong impact on the nomadic way of living there. Huge tracts of arid, rocky terrain made up of mountains, steppes, and high plateaus define both Mongolia and Tibet.

Sedentary farming communities find it difficult to prosper due to a lack of productive agricultural land, bad weather and constrained water supplies.

Traditional livelihoods in these types of regions have developed to centre on animal husbandry, notably the breeding of livestock such yaks, sheep, goats, horses, and camels.

Learn more about nomadic herders here:https://brainly.com/question/9775058

#SPJ1

No, majority should not dictate minority rights, as this can lead to unfair treatment and undermine equality principles.

I do not agree with Chris's statement that the majority should have the ability to make decisions about another group's rights simply because there are more of them.

This approach can lead to the marginalization of minority groups and promote an unfair balance of power.

It is important to uphold principles of equality and fairness by ensuring that all groups, regardless of their size, have equal rights and protections.

Allowing majority rule in matters of human rights can potentially result in discrimination and the suppression of minority voices, which should always be avoided.

For more such questions on equality, click on:

https://brainly.com/question/29520339

#SPJ11

1. The principle laid down in Articles 10 and 11 is the freedom of speech and expression.

2. The principle laid down in Articles 13 and 14 is the right to private property.

3. 'The separation of powers' refers to the division of governmental powers into three branches - the legislative, executive, and judicial branches - ensuring a system of checks and balances.

4. The Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen laid the foundations for modern democracy by establishing principles such as equality before the law, popular sovereignty, and individual rights, which became fundamental tenets of democratic governance.

1. Articles 10 and 11 of the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen establish the principle of freedom of speech and expression. This principle guarantees individuals the right to express their opinions, thoughts, and ideas freely without fear of censorship or retribution from the government.

It promotes the importance of open dialogue, the free exchange of information, and the ability to participate in public discourse, which are essential components of a democratic society.

2. Articles 13 and 14 of the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen enshrine the principle of the right to private property. This principle recognizes that individuals have the right to own and possess property and that it should be protected by law.

It establishes the idea that property rights are fundamental to individual liberty and economic prosperity, allowing individuals to use, enjoy, and dispose of their property as they see fit, within the boundaries of the law.

3. 'The separation of powers,' as stated in Article 16 of the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen, refers to the division of governmental powers among three distinct branches: the legislative, executive, and judicial.

This principle ensures that no single branch of government has absolute authority and that each branch serves as a check on the others.

Separating powers, aims to prevent the concentration of power in the hands of a few, promoting a system of checks and balances that helps safeguard individual rights and prevent tyranny.

4. The Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen laid the foundations for modern democracy by introducing several key principles. Firstly, it emphasized the concept of equality before the law, proclaiming that all individuals are born free and equal in rights.

Secondly, it introduced the idea of popular sovereignty, stating that the power of government derives from the consent of the governed. Additionally, it recognized and protected individual rights, such as the right to liberty, property, and due process.

These principles became fundamental elements of democratic governance, influencing subsequent constitutions and declarations of rights worldwide and shaping the development of democratic societies.

For more such answers on democracy

https://brainly.com/question/3710021

#SPJ8

The statement about psychology illustrates that even though psychology has been studied by people for a long time now, it just became a discipline recently.

The statement was made by Hermann Ebbinghaus and it reflected how psychology was developing in the academic field. It should be noted that even though psychology emerged in the 19th century, its roots came from ancient philosophy.

Before psychology became a discipline on its own, it was a branch in philosophy. There have been many people such as Socrates, Plato in the past who had knowledge about psychology.

Read philosophy related link on:

brainly.com/question/11655727

#SPJ1

Answer:

This quote is suggesting that debates among economists over inflation data can be compared to ancient Roman priests seeking auguries in the entrails of sacrificed animals. In ancient Rome, priests would examine the entrails of sacrificed animals to try to predict the future or determine the will of the gods.

Likewise, economists often engage in debates and discussions over inflation data to try to predict future trends in the economy or determine the best course of action. However, these debates can sometimes be seen as futile or ineffective, much like the ancient practice of examining entrails.

The speaker of the quote suggests that their colleagues may have taken offense to the comparison, possibly because it implies that the debates are not productive or meaningful. However, the speaker seems to be expressing a sense of frustration with the endless debates and the difficulties of making sense of complex economic data.

To implement the principle of challenging social injustices and inequalities in my inclusive classroom, I would start by creating a safe space for students to share their experiences and perspectives. I would encourage them to discuss issues related to social inequalities and injustices such as racism, sexism, homophobia, and ableism.

would also introduce diverse perspectives and experiences through literature, films, and guest speakers. For example, reading books by authors from different ethnic backgrounds or inviting speakers from marginalized communities to talk about their experiences.

To promote peace and eliminate isolation, labelling, bullying, and discrimination in my classroom, I would focus on creating a culture of kindness, empathy, and respect. I would encourage students to express their feelings and thoughts in a respectful and constructive manner, and I would intervene immediately when I observe any form of bullying or discrimination.

I would also organize activities that promote inclusivity, such as group projects that encourage teamwork and collaboration, and games that celebrate diversity. For example, a "cultural exchange" activity where students share their traditions and customs with their classmates. By implementing these principles, my inclusive classroom would be a safe, welcoming, and supportive environment for all students.

for more such questions on  my inclusive classroom,

https://brainly.com/question/26163213

#SPJ11

The Social Security Act was NOT enacted under President Hoover. So

option b is the right choice.

The program that was NOT enacted under President Hoover is the Social Security Act.

The Reconstruction Finance Corporation (RFC) was established by President Hoover in 1932 to provide financial assistance to struggling banks, businesses, and local governments during the Great Depression. It aimed to stabilize the economy by providing loans and aid to these entities.

The National Credit Corporation (NCC) was also established under President Hoover's administration in 1931. It was an effort to address the banking crisis and provide support to troubled banks by coordinating the refinancing of their loans.

The Emergency Relief and Construction Act, also known as the Hoover Dam Act, was signed into law by President Hoover in 1932. It authorized the construction of the Hoover Dam on the Colorado River, aiming to provide employment opportunities and stimulate economic growth.

However, the Social Security Act, which established the social security system in the United States, was not enacted until 1935, under President Franklin D. Roosevelt. It established a system of retirement benefits, unemployment insurance, and welfare programs to provide a safety net for the American population.

The right answer is option b. Social security act

For more such question on Social Security Act

https://brainly.com/question/15458338

#SPJ11

According th the information, it is correct that in Classical Greek philosophy, there is a belief that every being has an essential nature or essence that determines its characteristics and purpose.

To identify if the sentence is correct or false we have to look for some information about the Classical Greek philosophy and specially their ideas about the essential nature of the human.

According to the previous intruction, we can infer that in Classical Greek philosophy, there is a belief that every being has an essential nature or essence that determines its characteristics and purpose.

On the other hand we found that Jean-Paul Sartre had a different view on the nature of being because he established that existence precedes essence, which means that a being first exists and then creates its own essence or meaning.

Note: THis question is incomplete. Here is the complete information:

True or False

Learn more about philosophy in: https://brainly.com/question/28428294

#SPJ1

Answer:

Both groups endured unjust restrictions on their rights.

Explanation:

The correct option is C. Schools had been forced to close or the school year was cut short.

During the Great Depression, many schools were forced to close or shorten their academic year due to budget cuts.

This left children with little to no education, causing a significant impact on their future prospects. As a result, many children were unable to receive an adequate education, which led to an increase in illiteracy rates.

Furthermore, the economic hardship faced by families during the Depression meant that many parents could not afford to provide their children with adequate food, clothing, and medical care.

Malnutrition, illness, and poor living conditions became common, leading to a decline in the overall health of children.

Many children were also forced to work to help their families make ends meet, leading to a lack of opportunities for education and socialization. The wages earned by children were meager, and they often worked in dangerous and difficult conditions, putting their health and safety at risk.

The Great Depression had a profound impact on children's lives, affecting their education, health, and well-being. It highlights the importance of investing in children's education and providing them with adequate support during times of economic hardship.

The right option is C. Schools had been forced to close or the school year was cut short.

For more questions on the Great Depression, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/14908452

#SPJ11

Answer:

negative outcomes—leads to conflict with others, infringes on rights of others, creates xenophobia—the fear that someone will take them over.

:

Answer:

Nationalism causes dishonesty within people because, he argues, every nationalist, having chosen one side, persuades himself that his side is the strongest, regardless of the arguments against the faction.

Hope this helps :)

Pls brainliest...

In the realm of philosophy, metaphysics explores the fundamental nature of reality, epistemology examines the nature of knowledge and how we acquire it, ethics delves into moral principles and values, and aesthetics explores the nature of beauty and artistic experiences.

Different branches of philosophy encompass various aspects of philosophical inquiry, each with its unique focus and contribution. Metaphysics, the branch of philosophy that deals with the fundamental nature of reality, explores questions regarding existence, causality, substance, and the nature of being.

It delves into inquiries about the nature of the universe, the relationship between mind and body, and the existence of God or ultimate reality.

Epistemology, another significant branch, investigates the nature of knowledge and the processes through which we acquire it.

It examines questions such as how knowledge is justified, the limits of human understanding, and the distinction between belief and knowledge.

Epistemology explores different theories of knowledge, including rationalism, empiricism, and constructivism, providing a foundation for understanding the nature and scope of human knowledge.

Ethics, the branch concerned with moral principles and values, addresses questions about what is right and wrong, good and bad, and how individuals ought to act.

It delves into various ethical theories such as consequentialism, deontology, and virtue ethics, exploring concepts of moral responsibility, ethical decision-making, and the nature of ethical judgments.

Aesthetics, the branch that examines the nature of beauty and artistic experiences, explores questions related to art, beauty, and aesthetic judgment.

It considers the nature of aesthetic experiences, the criteria for artistic value, and the relationship between art and culture.

Aesthetics encompasses topics such as the philosophy of art, theories of beauty, and the role of aesthetics in our perception and interpretation of the world.

Each of these branches contributes to the broader landscape of philosophical inquiry, shedding light on different aspects of human existence, knowledge, morality, and artistic expression.

By engaging with these branches, philosophers deepen our understanding of the world, challenge assumptions, and provoke critical reflection on fundamental aspects of human life.

Through the exploration of metaphysics, epistemology, ethics, and aesthetics, we gain valuable insights into the nature of reality, the boundaries of knowledge, the principles that guide our actions, and the appreciation of beauty and creativity in our lives.

For similar question on philosophy.

https://brainly.com/question/30500437

#SPJ11

The Columbian Exchange, which was the widespread transfer of plants, animals, culture, human populations, technology, and ideas between the Americas and the Old World following the voyage of Christopher Columbus in 1492, presented both advantages and disadvantages for Native Americans and Europeans.

Native Americans benefited from new crops, animals, and technologies, but were devastated by diseases brought by Europeans. Europeans gained new sources of wealth and expanded their food supply, but also suffered from new diseases and established colonies that exploited Native American labor and resources.

Therefore, the Columbian Exchange had both positive and negative impacts on Native Americans and Europeans.

Learn more about the Columbian Exchange, here:

https://brainly.com/question/12894722

#SPJ1

Three items that I think may be good primary sources for information on my life include personal diary, family photographs and oral history interviews.

Personal diary/journal: A person's diary or notebook is a great primary source for details about their daily activities. It gives a first-person account of their ideas, emotions, encounters, and routine activities.

Family photographs: Family photos are an excellent primary source for learning about a family's or community's history. They provide a picture of people, places, and events and can shed light on kinship dynamics, traditions, and customs. Photographs can be used to track historical changes in lifestyle, technology, and fashion.

Oral history interviews: An great primary source for preserving people's recollections and experiences is an oral history interview. They can offer a first-person perspective on important occasions, societal movements, or cultural customs. Understanding the viewpoints of underprivileged or underrepresented groups can also be accomplished through oral history interviews.

Learn more on writing diaries here https://brainly.com/question/32024761

#SPJ1

The Columbian Exchange refers to the widespread exchange of plants, animals, and diseases between the Old World (Europe, Africa, and Asia) and the New World (the Americas) following Christopher Columbus's voyages in 1492.

Positive items:

Negative items:

for similar questions on Columbian Exchange

https://brainly.com/question/2599432

#SPJ11

It encouraged self-reliance through the creation of Black Community Programmes. Black Consciousness played an important role in inspiring the Soweto youth to action in 1976. Its philosophy filled them with the self-confidence to address their own harsh circumstances.

The list of 10 events that were said to have directly relate to the reason that  the U.S. did not join world war 2 before the bombing of Pearl Harbor is given in the image attached.

The United States remained authoritatively impartial and did not connect World War II some time recently the bombarding of Pearl Harbor due to a few reasons:

The stand to maintain a strategic distance from outside traps: After World War I, the U.S. populace was war-weary and needed to maintain a strategic distance from getting included in another expensive  strife. The approach of nonintervention won, with a center on household issues and a hesitance to lock in in abroad clashes.

Learn more about world war 2 from

https://brainly.com/question/651584

#SPJ1

The threat of nuclear conflict was superseded by emergence of new global challenges such as terrorism, cybersecurity and climate change.

With end of Cold War and collapse of the Soviet Union, the world witnessed significant reduction in the risk of nuclear conflict, but, the new global challenges emerged and shifted focus from the nuclear threat to issues such as terrorism, cybersecurity and climate change.

Rise of non-state actors such as terrorist organizations, presented a new security threat while the rapid expansion of technology and the internet created new vulnerabilities in the digital realm.

Read more about Soviet Union

brainly.com/question/1310325

#SPJ1