What was not an amusement sport that became popular in the growing cities of the late 1800s?

The correct order of events in the conflict over the Ohio Territory is as follows:

1. American Indians were defeated at the Battle of Fallen Timbers.

2. The United States signed the Treaty of Greenville.

3. Tecumseh formed an American Indian confederation.

4. Tecumseh tried to rally support during the War of 1812.

5. Little Turtle defeated US troops in a border war.

6. American settlers began to arrive in the Ohio River Valley.

7. Andrew Jackson and his army faced off against the Creek.

8. The Creek were defeated in the Battle of Horseshoe Bend.

9. Runaway enslaved people came to live with the Seminole.

10. The Seminole fought and lost the First Seminole War.

This sequence of events outlines the major developments in the conflict over the Ohio Territory, including battles, treaties, the formation of alliances, and the impact of American settlement and expansion.

It is important to note that these events spanned a significant period of time and involved various Native American tribes and conflicts with both British and American forces.

For more questions on Ohio Territory

https://brainly.com/question/4722224

#SPJ8

Answer:

Explanation:

----------------------------------------------------

Answer: D) Supreme Court can undo public policy created by Congress.

Explanation: Judicial review is the power of the courts to examine the actions of the legislative, executive, and administrative branches of the government and to determine whether they are consistent with the constitution. If the courts find that an action violates the constitution, they can declare it unconstitutional and nullify it. This means that judicial review can undo public policy created by Congress or other branches of the government.

Judicial review is one of the checks and balances in the separation of powers, which is a system that prevents any branch of the government from becoming too powerful or abusing its authority. Judicial review allows the courts to supervise and limit the actions of Congress and other branches when they exceed their constitutional powers or infringe on the rights and liberties of the people.

Judicial review is not explicitly mentioned in the text of the U.S. Constitution, but it was established by the Supreme Court in the landmark case of Marbury v. Madison (1803). In this case, Chief Justice John Marshall declared that “it is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is.” He argued that the courts have the duty to interpret the constitution and to ensure that it is followed by all branches of the government.

Since then, judicial review has been used by the Supreme Court and other federal and state courts to review and invalidate various laws and actions that were deemed unconstitutional. Some examples of public policies that were undone by judicial review are:

Therefore, a possible outcome from judicial review is that the Supreme Court can undo public policy created by Congress or other branches of the government if it violates the constitution.

Hope this helps, and have a great day! =)

The possible outcome from judicial review is that the Supreme Court can undo public policy created by Congress. Therefore, option (D) is the correct outcome.

Judicial review is the court's ability to assess whether the legislative, executive, and administrative branches of the government are acting in accordance with the Constitution.

The courts have the authority to declare something unlawful and toss it out if they determine it violates the Constitution.

This implies that judicial review has the power to overturn legislation passed by Congress or other government agencies.

One of the mechanisms for balance in the system of the separation of powers, which prevents any branch of the government from growing too strong or misusing its authority, is judicial review.

When Congress and other branches go beyond their constitutional authority or infringe on the liberties and rights of the populace, judicial review enables the courts to monitor and restrict those acts.

Hence, option (D) is the correct outcome of the Judicial Review.

To learn more about judicial review, refer below;

https://brainly.com/question/24078224

#SPJ4

The Progressives' efforts led to significant changes in American society. Their reforms resulted in improved working conditions, increased political accountability, expanded access to education, and the creation of social welfare programs.

The Progressives of the late 19th and early 20th centuries aimed to address a wide range of social, economic, and political issues.

They focused on several key areas for societal reform. One area targeted was labor conditions.

Progressives advocated for improved workplace safety, the establishment of minimum wage laws, and the regulation of working hours.

Their efforts led to the creation of labor unions and the passage of important legislation, such as the Fair Labor Standards Act.

Another area of concern was political corruption.

Progressives pushed for political reforms, including the direct election of senators, the introduction of primary elections, and the adoption of anti-corruption measures. These changes aimed to increase government transparency and accountability.

Education was also a major focus for Progressives. They promoted the idea of universal education and worked to improve school facilities, teacher training, and curriculum standards.

These efforts resulted in the expansion of public education and the establishment of kindergarten programs. Lastly, Progressives sought to address social inequality and poverty.

They supported the establishment of social welfare programs, such as the creation of public housing and the introduction of welfare benefits. These initiatives aimed to alleviate poverty and provide a safety net for vulnerable members of society.

Overall, the Progressives' efforts led to significant changes in American society. Their reforms resulted in improved working conditions, increased political accountability, expanded access to education, and the creation of social welfare programs.

For more questions on American society.

https://brainly.com/question/13323062

#SPJ8

The article in the Constitution that outlines the federal judicial branch is Article III.

Question 7: The verdict as determined by jury decision.

Question 8: Criminal cases deal with someone who is accused of breaking the law, while civil cases deal with disputes between people or groups.

Question 9: U.S. District Court in Utah.

Question 10: Trial, appellate, and supreme.

Article III of the Constitution outlines the structure and powers of the federal judiciary in the United States. It is primarily informed by the framers' intent to establish an independent judiciary that serves as a separate and coequal branch of government.

The language and provisions of Article III draw inspiration from various sources, including English common law, state constitutions, and the experiences and debates of the Constitutional Convention. The framers aimed to create a system of federal courts capable of interpreting and applying the law, resolving disputes, and ensuring the protection of individual rights.

learn more about Article III of the constitution: https://brainly.com/question/1194247

#SPJ1

The true statement about radio in the 1920s is:

A. News on the radio was immediate and instantaneous.

During the 1920s, radio broadcasting played a significant role in disseminating news and information to the public. Radio stations would broadcast news bulletins, updates, and live reports, allowing people to receive news in a more immediate and timely manner compared to other forms of media at that time.

This instant delivery of news was one of the key factors that contributed to the growing popularity of radio during the 1920s.

Read more on radio here https://brainly.com/question/69373

#SPJ1

Answer: I believe it’s B

Explanation:

1. Appointment by the governor is a method used by states to select state judges.

2. Marbury v. Madison is the Supreme Court case that established its power and legitimacy by asserting the principle of judicial review.

3. When a court requires payment of damages from one party to another, it is referred to as a remedy.

4. Some Americans prefer the appointment of judges over elections because they believe it frees judges from the pressures of public support and re-election.

5. In the landmark Supreme Court decision in California v. Bakke, the Court ruled that the equal protection clause supported Bakke's case.

Find more questions on governor

https://brainly.com/question/16209628

#SPJ8

The number of Jewish refugees nearly doubling from the previous year occurred predominantly during and after World War II, specifically in the years 1945 and 1946.

Due to the Holocaust and Nazi persecution, millions of Jews were forced to flee their homes during World War II. Although it is difficult to pinpoint an exact figure, millions are thought to have sought safety. Many people escaped Nazi occupied areas and looked for refuge in other nations. However, because to limiting immigration laws and resistance from many countries, a sizable portion were unable to find refuge and sadly perished.

Jewish refugees increased significantly in 1938 as a result of the bloody Kristallnacht events. In the years that followed the liberation of the concentration camps, between 1945 and 1948, the majority of Jewish refugees arrived. Relocation efforts were made, and the founding of Israel in 1948 gave many Jewish exiles and displaced people a place to call home.

Learn more on World war 2 here https://brainly.com/question/651584

#SPJ1

Answer:

1938

Explanation:

Took the test on Edge

Answer:

D) Companies made everyone who lived in company towns sign an anti-union contract.

Explanation:

One specific way that living in a company town prevented workers from forming organized labor unions was by requiring residents to sign anti-union contracts. These contracts would typically include clauses or provisions that explicitly prohibited workers from joining or forming labor unions, participating in strikes, or engaging in any collective bargaining activities. By making such contracts mandatory for residents, the companies effectively suppressed the workers' ability to organize and advocate for their rights as a collective group. Violation of these contracts often resulted in severe consequences, such as termination of employment or eviction from company-provided housing, which further discouraged workers from attempting to form unions.

Answer:

D

Explanation:

Some of the key motives for British colonial settlements included:

1. Economic gains. Britain saw colonies as opportunities to acquire new markets for its goods, resources like timber and precious metals, and cheap raw materials for its industries. Colonial trade allowed Britain to grow its wealth and power.

2. Strategic benefits. Colonies could serve as military bases, coaling stations, and sites for naval dockyards. This expanded Britain's global influence and power projection capabilities.

3. Spread of Christianity and "civilization". Many British leaders viewed colonialism as a means to propagate Christianity and what they considered to be superior European culture and values.

4. National prestige. found and rule over far-flung colonial empires was considered a mark of a great nation and increased Britain's global prestige and influence.

5. Population overflow. Some colonies, especially in North America, served as places to send excess population from Britain, especially unemployed workers or prisoners.

So economic motives were a primary factor, along with strategic calculations and a desire to extend British national power and reputation on the world stage. The desire to spread Christianity and "civilize" indigenous peoples was also an important ideological motivation.

D. Men

---------------------

The king of Great Britain violated the principle of limited government by abusing his power over the colonists.

For more questions on Great Britain

https://brainly.com/question/28734617

#SPJ8

C, limited government 

Explanation: The king of Great Britain violated the principle of limited government by abusing his power over the colonists. The colonists believed that the king went beyond the limits of his authority and imposed unfair laws on them. This violated the idea that a government's powers should be restricted to prevent the abuse of power. The colonists wanted a government that respected their rights and freedoms. 

Happy to help; have a great day! Please remember to give me Brainliest :)

Giuseppe Garibaldi led the "Red Shirts" in their fight against conservative forces during the Italian Risorgimento.

For more questions on Italian

https://brainly.com/question/22155070

#SPJ8

The French government during this period raised taxes, called for genuine political reform, and attempted to equalize the tax burden across estates, but it did not reduce the tax burden specifically for the Third Estate.

During the era characterized by bad harvests, famine, and rioting in France, the government implemented several measures to address the worsening financial crisis.

Firstly, the government opted to raise taxes as a means of generating additional revenue. This decision aimed to alleviate the economic strain and stabilize public finances.

Furthermore, in response to growing calls for political reform, the government initiated efforts to bring about genuine political changes. These reforms sought to address the grievances and demands of the population, aiming to foster a fairer and more representative political system.

In an attempt to tackle the issue of economic inequality, the government introduced a policy mandating that all estates, regardless of their social standing, pay the same taxes.

This move aimed to create a more equitable tax system, reducing the burden on the lower classes and redistributing the tax responsibility more evenly across society.

It is worth noting that the reduction of the Third Estate's tax burden, representing the commoners and middle-class citizens, is not historically accurate.

In fact, the Third Estate bore the brunt of the tax burden, leading to widespread dissatisfaction and contributing to the social unrest that eventually culminated in the French Revolution.

For more such questions government,click on

https://brainly.com/question/1772602

#SPJ8

The positions of Webster, the Federalist and steadfast New England supporter of the Union; Clay, the "war hawk" and National Rebublican leader from the West; and Calhoun, the young nationalist who became the leading spokesperson for the South and slavery were sectionalism.

Sectionalism is the excessive dedication to a region's interests over national interests.

There have been conflicts between various regions of the country throughout American history, but from the country's founding until the American Civil War, Northerners' and Southerners' divergent perspectives on the institution of slavery were the most significant sectional divide and the country's defining political issue.

Read more about Sectionalism

https://brainly.com/question/27891016

#SPJ1

Abundant resources, agricultural productivity, technological innovations, capital access, immigration, and infrastructure development were advantages for rapid industrialization in the US.

For more questions on industrialization

https://brainly.com/question/1078028

#SPJ8

Complete question:

What advantages did the US have that made it ripe for rapid industrialization? Check all that apply.

- massive forests

- access to two oceans

- rich mineral resources

- fertile land

- railroads

Answer: B

Explanation:

The statement "If people approve of the new program, it could benefit me politically by helping my chances of reelection" reflects the potential political advantage that the politician anticipates by implementing the program.

For more such questions on reelection

https://brainly.com/question/3512590

#SPJ8

The incorporation of the Bill of Rights into state law was not an easy process due to political and social considerations. The Supreme Court was faced with many challenges in its attempt to incorporate the Bill of Rights into state law.

Among the challenges was the issue of state sovereignty, which had been a contentious issue since the adoption of the Constitution. The first ten amendments to the Constitution are known as the Bill of Rights. These amendments were intended to protect the rights of individuals from infringement by the federal government. The question of whether these rights should be extended to state governments became a controversial issue in the early years of the republic.

This was because the Bill of Rights was originally meant to limit the power of the federal government, not the states. The Supreme Court was faced with the question of whether the Bill of Rights applied to the states, and if so, how it should be incorporated. The Court had to determine whether the Bill of Rights applied to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

The Due Process Clause prohibits states from depriving individuals of life, liberty, or property without due process of law. The Court had to determine whether the Due Process Clause incorporated the Bill of Rights into state law. The Court first addressed the issue of incorporation in the case of Barron v. Baltimore in 1833. The Court held that the Bill of Rights did not apply to the states. This decision was based on the idea that the Bill of Rights was intended to limit the power of the federal government, not the states.

The Court also held that the Fourteenth Amendment did not incorporate the Bill of Rights into state law. Incorporation of the Bill of Rights into state law was not achieved until the mid-twentieth century. The Court gradually incorporated the Bill of Rights into state law through a series of cases. The Court first incorporated the First Amendment's freedom of speech clause in the case of Gitlow v. New York in 1925. The Court gradually extended the incorporation of the Bill of Rights to cover most of the protections in the Bill of Rights.

The Supreme Court faced many challenges in its attempt to incorporate the Bill of Rights into state law. The main challenge was the issue of state sovereignty. The Bill of Rights was originally meant to limit the power of the federal government, not the states. The Court had to determine whether the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment incorporated the Bill of Rights into state law. The Court gradually incorporated the Bill of Rights into state law through a series of cases.

For more questions on Bill of Rights

https://brainly.com/question/30859931

#SPJ8

The 14th Amendment was not a nativist response to immigration and immigrants.

The 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution ratified in 1868, granted citizenship to all individuals born or naturalized in the United States, regardless of their ethnicity or immigration status. It was a significant step towards ensuring equal protection under the law for all individuals, including immigrants.

On the other hand, the other options mentioned - the passage of the Chinese Exclusion Act, mob violence toward immigrants, and the Dillingham report - can be seen as nativist responses to immigration. The Chinese Exclusion Act passed in 1882, was a federal law that severely restricted immigration from China.

It was the first significant immigration restriction targeting a specific nationality and reflected nativist sentiments and anti-Chinese sentiment prevalent at the time. Mob violence toward immigrants, particularly in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, often targeted certain immigrant groups deemed undesirable by nativist factions.

These acts of violence, such as the Chinese Massacre of 1871 or the violence against Italian immigrants in the late 19th century, were fueled by nativist fears and prejudices.

The Question was Incomplete, Find the full content below :

What was not a nativist response to immigration and immigrants?

passage of the Chinese Exclusion Act

the 14th Amendment

mob violence toward immigrants

the Dillingham report

know more about 14th Amendment here:

https://brainly.com/question/500095

#SPJ8

According to the given options, Charlie could have done something to Mark which led him to chase Charlie. Therefore, option B. Charlie taking Mark's bike without asking is the correct option since taking someone's property without permission can be seen as an offense. It is possible that Mark may have chased Charlie to retrieve his bike or to make him pay for taking it without his consent.

Hence, the correct option is B

Answer:

Question 1: For "treason, bribery, or other high crimes or misdemeanors" under Article II of the Constitution.

Question 2: Has the power to commission military officers.

Question 3: Executive Departments, Executive Office of the President, Independent Agencies, White House Staff.

Question 4: It is a complex process, as the president must consider many different interests and potential outcomes.

Question 5: Organization and duties of the executive branch.

Explanation:

1. According to the Constitution, the reason that the president and other federal officials may be impeached is "For 'treason, bribery, or other high crimes or misdemeanors' under Article II of the Constitution." Option D is the correct choice

2. The statement that describes the president's role as chief executive is "Has the power to commission military officers." Option B is the correct choice

3. The list that includes all major parts of the executive branch is "Executive Departments, Executive Office of the President, Independent Agencies, White House Staff."  Option A is the correct choice

4. The statement that is true about presidential decision-making is "It is a complex process, as the president must consider many different interests and potential outcomes."  Option A is the correct choice

5. Article II of the U.S. Constitution describes "Organization and duties of the executive branch."  Option D is the correct choice

1. According to the Constitution, the reason that the president and other federal officials may be impeached is "For 'treason, bribery, or other high crimes or misdemeanors' under Article II of the Constitution." Impeachment is a constitutional process by which elected officials, including the president, can be removed from office if they are found guilty of serious offenses.  Option D is the correct choice

2. The statement that describes the president's role as chief executive is "Has the power to commission military officers." As the chief executive, the president is the commander-in-chief of the armed forces and has the authority to appoint and commission military officers.  Option B is the correct choice

3. The list that includes all major parts of the executive branch is "Executive Departments, Executive Office of the President, Independent Agencies, White House Staff." These entities make up the key components of the executive branch of the U.S. government.  Option A is the correct choice

4. The statement that is true about presidential decision-making is "It is a complex process, as the president must consider many different interests and potential outcomes." Presidential decision-making involves evaluating various factors, including national security, economic considerations, and legal implications, making it a complex and multifaceted process.  Option A is the correct choice

5. Article II of the U.S. Constitution describes "Organization and duties of the executive branch." This article outlines the powers and responsibilities of the president, including their role as the chief executive, commander-in-chief, and head of state. It also covers the president's ability to appoint key officials, grant pardons, and execute the laws of the United States.  Option D is the correct choice

These constitutional provisions establish the framework for the executive branch of the U.S. government and the role and powers of the president within that branch.

For more such questions on Constitution:

https://brainly.com/question/20336789

#SPJ2

Answer:

Eve was tricked by the serpent into eating the forbidden fruit from the tree of knowledge

Explanation:

The statement that is true about the U.S. judicial system is "The Judiciary Act of 1789 established and organized the system of lower federal courts." (Option A).

The court that would have jurisdiction in the case of a person from Virginia receiving a speeding ticket in the State of North Carolina would be "State court in North Carolina." (Option B).

"Original jurisdiction" means the "Right to hear a case the first time it is presented in court." (Option A)

When the U.S. Supreme Court rejects a petition to hear a case, the outcome is that "The decision of the lower court will stand." (Option A).

Question 5: The true statement about the U.S. Court of Appeals is that "A panel of judges hears select cases from a federal trial court." (Option D).

A legal system refers to bureaucracy of courts and legal organizations that are responsible for defining and applying the society in a country or jurisdiction. It is a important component of the overall legal structure and is tasked accompanying resolving disputes, executing justice, and maintaining the rule of law.

The legal systemtypically resides of various levels of courts, varying from trial courts or lower courts to appellate courts and, in some cases, a highest federal court. Each level of the court has its own area of authority and authority to handle particular types of cases.

Learn more about judicial system here: https://brainly.com/question/12694841

#SPJ1

Answer: a b a a d

Explanation:

Option A is correct. William Penn's "holy experiment" refers to his vision and implementation of a religiously tolerant and democratic society in the American colony of Pennsylvania during the 17th century.

Penn, a Quaker, founded Pennsylvania as a haven for religious freedom and sought to establish a society based on principles of equality, peace, and justice.

His goal was to create a place where individuals of different faiths could coexist and practice their religions freely, without persecution or discrimination. This inclusive approach attracted settlers from various religious backgrounds, making Pennsylvania a diverse and tolerant colony during that time.

Read mroe on  William Penn here https://brainly.com/question/14112144

#SPJ1

William pen’s “holy experiment” is option A. to build a colony where people of all faiths could co-exist amicably.

The correct answer is A. William Penn's "Holy Experiment" referred to his vision of creating a colony where people of all faiths could live together in harmony. Penn, a Quaker, founded the colony of Pennsylvania in 1681 as a haven for Quakers who faced religious persecution in England.

However, he also wanted Pennsylvania to be a place where people of different religious backgrounds could enjoy religious freedom and coexist peacefully. Penn implemented policies that promoted religious tolerance and democratic principles in Pennsylvania, attracting settlers from various religious groups.

learn more about William Penn: https://brainly.com/question/13409722

#SPJ1

Answer: Americans in the region only spoke English, best describes why there was no need for immigrants to live in the South.

Explanation:

Slaves handled nearly all the labor needs So being an agricultural and rural area, the South didn't really have many opportunities for those who arrived there. Although there was a time in which immigrants did go to South, many wouldn't handle the abusive terms of their contracts. A lot of them died. Eventually, the South managed to do everything that they wanted by recurring to the use of slaves.

According to the prisoner in the second selection, the restrictions imposed on advocates who defended suspected heretics included severe punishments, such as imprisonment, torture, and even death.

For more such questions on restrictions

https://brainly.com/question/15070309

#SPJ8