Prior to the Civil War, there were two main views in the United States regarding the sovereignty of the states: the states' rights view and the nationalist view.
The states' rights view held that the states were sovereign entities that had voluntarily entered into a union for their mutual benefit. Under this view, the federal government had limited powers and was subject to the authority of the states. Proponents of states' rights argued that states had the right to nullify federal laws that they deemed unconstitutional, and some even argued that states had the right to secede from the union.
The nationalist view, on the other hand, held that the federal government was the ultimate authority in the United States and that the states were subordinate entities. Proponents of this view argued that the federal government had broad powers under the Constitution to regulate interstate commerce and to promote the general welfare, and that the states were not empowered to challenge federal authority.
These two views came into conflict over a number of issues, including tariffs, slavery, and states' rights to secede. Ultimately, the Civil War was fought in large part over the question of whether states had the right to secede from the union, with the nationalist view prevailing and establishing the supremacy of the federal government over the states.
To learn more about Civil War click here : brainly.com/question/11874600
#SPJ11
robert francis allstonâs chief concern as a slaveholder was to guard against his slavesâ
Robert Francis Allston, as a slaveholder, was primarily concerned with safeguarding against potential threats or rebellions from his slaves. His main priority was to maintain control and prevent any acts of resistance or escape. This concern reflects the inherent power dynamics and oppressive nature of the institution of slavery.
As a slaveholder, Robert Francis Allston's primary concern revolved around the security and control of his enslaved individuals. The institution of slavery was built upon the exploitation and subjugation of human beings, and slaveholders like Allston were keenly aware of the potential risks associated with maintaining this oppressive system. The fear of slave revolts, resistance, or escape was a constant worry for slaveholders, as such acts threatened their authority and economic interests. To guard against potential uprisings, Allston employed various measures to assert control and monitor his slaves. These measures often involved strict regulations, surveillance, and punitive actions. Physical punishments, such as whippings, were employed as a means of deterrence and discipline. Additionally, slaveholders like Allston implemented a range of restrictions and limitations on the enslaved population, including limitations on movement, education, and communication. These measures aimed to suppress any semblance of autonomy or collective organization among the slaves. The underlying motivation behind Allston's concern was the preservation of his power, wealth, and social status. Slavery was deeply entrenched in the economic and social fabric of the antebellum South, and slaveholders like Allston derived their prosperity from the labor and exploitation of enslaved individuals. Any disruption to this system posed a significant threat to their way of life. Consequently, the primary focus for slaveholders was to maintain a tight grip on their enslaved population, constantly on guard against any signs of resistance, rebellion, or escape. Overall, Robert Francis Allston's chief concern as a slaveholder was centered around the need to safeguard against potential threats posed by his slaves. This concern underscores the oppressive nature of slavery, characterized by the constant fear and control exerted by slaveholders over the enslaved population.
Learn more about power dynamics here: brainly.com/question/20290780
#SPJ11
What were the economic reforms proposed by the Populists at the Omaha Platform in 1892? 1
The economic reforms proposed by the Populists at the Omaha Platform in 1892 included advocating for a bimetallism monetary system, establishing a graduated income tax, implementing government ownership of key industries, and promoting the direct election of senators.
What did these reforms entail?Bimetallism would involve the use of both gold and silver as currency to combat deflation. A graduated income tax would ensure fairer taxation, placing a higher burden on wealthier individuals. Government ownership of industries, such as railroads and telegraphs, aimed to reduce corruption and monopolies.Lastly, the direct election of senators sought to increase democratic representation within the government.Hence, these were the economic reforms proposed by the Populists at the Omaha Platform in 1892.
To know more on Economic reforms visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30872612
#SPJ11
opinion of non-whites regarding apartheid
That non-whites were strongly opposed to apartheid in South Africa.
The racial subjugation of non-white people, such as native Africans, persons with Asian ancestry, and those of mixed races, was made worse by the apartheid system.
The practice of keeping non-Whites barely above the poverty line was the same under apartheid. Surveys of public opinion done during the apartheid era revealed that non-whites were largely against the system.
As a result, the significance of the opinion of non-whites regarding apartheid are the aforementioned.
Learn more about on apartheid, here:
https://brainly.com/question/3811942
#SPJ1
the two leaders who finally ended the apartheid regime without major bloodshed in south africa were
The two leaders who played a significant role in ending apartheid in South Africa without major bloodshed were Nelson Mandela and F.W. de Klerk.
Mandela was a longtime anti-apartheid activist who had been imprisoned for 27 years before being released in 1990. He was a charismatic leader who inspired his followers with his vision of a non-racial, democratic South Africa. De Klerk was the last white president of South Africa who initiated the reforms that led to the end of apartheid. He worked with Mandela and other black leaders to negotiate a peaceful transition to democracy, and together they won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1993 for their efforts. Their leadership and commitment to reconciliation helped South Africa avoid the violence that many feared would occur during the transition to a democratic government.
To know more about apartheid,
https://brainly.com/question/14538746
#SPJ11
Malthus argued that the world was going to run out of food as the population continued to
grow. Do you think this is still a concern today? Why or why not?
Malthus was proven wrong regarding the shortage of food compared to the human population thanks to the advancement in agriculture.
Malthus argued that the human population would outgrow food production, but today, there isn't any such concern. Today the world has the ability to feed 10 billion people while the population is at around 8 billion. Although still, people die in famines and food shortages and this has to do with the political condition and the distribution of agricultural goods.
With each passing year, agricultural production overall increases while the area under agriculture has fallen, showing that as technology progresses, more food is produced on less land.
Thus, the concern isn't valid anymore while some sections want to make this bogeyman theory return, it isn't unless innovation stops in the agriculture sector.
Learn more about agriculture here:
https://brainly.com/question/31113136
#SPJ1
after 1534, anabaptists were greatly feared by secular authorities in europe because they:
After 1534, Anabaptists were greatly feared by secular authorities in Europe because they posed a significant threat to the established religious and political order.
Anabaptists rejected infant baptism, instead insisting on adult baptism, which was seen as a direct challenge to the authority of the state-sponsored church.
They also believed in the separation of church and state, which was a radical departure from the prevailing view that church and state should be intertwined.
The Anabaptists also believed in the idea of a voluntary, community-based church that was free from state control.
This idea was particularly dangerous to the authorities, as it threatened to undermine their power and authority over the people.
Furthermore, the Anabaptists were known for their refusal to take oaths or participate in military service, which was seen as a threat to the stability and security of the state.
The Anabaptists were also seen as subversive and dangerous because of their belief in the imminent return of Christ and the establishment of a new, millennial kingdom.
This idea was seen as a direct challenge to the existing social and political order, and many authorities feared that it would lead to rebellion and unrest.
Know more about Anabaptists here:
https://brainly.com/question/11388658
#SPJ11
12 angry man story
Which character had the most development
throughout the story? Who had the least? How does it show?
The 1954 drama of the same name served as the basis for the movie 12 Angry Men. The movie chronicles a jury's decision-making process as it considers whether to find an 18-year-old defendant guilty of killing his father.
One afternoon is spent with the jury debating whether the defendant is guilty or innocent based on their individual morals and perceptions. 12 Angry Men, which had its 1957 premiere to widespread acclaim, is still regarded as one of the best films of all time.
Three Oscars, including Best Picture and Best Director, were nominated for it. The 1958 BAFTA Award for Best Foreign Actor was eventually won by Henry Fonda. The majority of the movie is set in one room.
Learn more about 12 Angry men here:
https://brainly.com/question/19455369
#SPJ1
the allies dropped over 1.5 million tons of bombs on europe to win world war ii. True or false
True: During World War II, the Allies conducted a massive bombing campaign against Nazi Germany and occupied territories in Europe.
This campaign included both strategic bombing, aimed at destroying Germany's industrial and military capabilities, and tactical bombing, aimed at supporting ground operations.
Over the course of the war, the Allies dropped an estimated 1.5 million tons of bombs on Europe, including both high-explosive and incendiary bombs.
The bombing campaign caused extensive damage and casualties and played a significant role in bringing about Germany's eventual defeat.
However, it is worth noting that the morality and effectiveness of strategic bombing remain a subject of debate among historians and military analysts.
Know more about World War II here:
https://brainly.com/question/651584
#SPJ11
the so-called "barren rock" which great britain gained as a result of the opium war was
The so-called "barren rock" which Great Britain gained as a result of the Opium War was actually the island of Hong Kong.
Hong Kong was not actually barren, but it was considered to be a less desirable piece of land compared to other territories that the British could have acquired at the time. Despite this perception, Hong Kong would later become a major economic and cultural hub in Asia and an important part of British colonial history.
Understand the context - The Opium War took place between 1839 and 1842 between Great Britain and China.
Identify the main event - As a result of this war, China signed the Treaty of Nanking in 1842.
Recognize the specific outcome - Under the Treaty of Nanking, China ceded the territory of Hong Kong to Great Britain, which was then described as a "barren rock."
Learn more about "barren rock."
brainly.com/question/31394593
#SPJ11
how did hitler’s vulnerable position consolidate his power
Answer: Adolf Hitler's vulnerable position, especially during the early years of his rule, actually helped him consolidate his power in a number of ways. Here are a few examples:
The Reichstag Fire: In 1933, shortly after Hitler became Chancellor of Germany, a fire broke out in the Reichstag building in Berlin. Although the cause of the fire is still disputed, Hitler and the Nazis used it as a pretext to suspend civil liberties and crack down on political opponents. Hitler was able to take advantage of the crisis to push through the Enabling Act, which gave him dictatorial powers and allowed him to rule by decree.
Overall, Hitler's vulnerable position in the early years of his rule actually helped him consolidate his power by allowing him to take advantage of crises, eliminate rivals, build a cult of personality, revive the economy, and pursue an expansionist foreign policy.
what was the "grandfather clause" in relation to jim crow laws? (explain in one or two sentences) luoa
The "grandfather clause" was a provision used in some Southern states during the era of Jim Crow laws to exempt individuals from restrictive voting requirements if their ancestors had been eligible to vote before the abolition of slavery.
The grandfather clause was implemented as a way to circumvent the 15th Amendment of the United States Constitution, which granted African American men the right to vote. By setting up stringent voting requirements such as literacy tests or poll taxes, Southern states effectively disenfranchised black voters. However, the grandfather clause allowed white individuals whose ancestors were eligible to vote before 1867 (or another specified date) to bypass these requirements. This clause essentially ensured that many white citizens could vote while excluding newly enfranchised black citizens, perpetuating racial inequality and suppressing black political participation during the Jim Crow era.
Learn more about Jim Crow laws here: brainly.com/question/29884723
#SPJ11
The Munich Agreement was a desperate act of appeasement at the cost of the Czechoslovak state, performed by Chamberlain and French premier, Daladier, in the vain hope that it would satisfy Hitler's stormy ambition, and thus secure for Europe a peaceful future. We know today that it was unnecessary ... because the Czech defenses were very strong ... and because the German generals, conscious of Germany's relative weakness at that moment, were actually prepared to attempt to remove Hitler . .. had he continued to move toward war. Would this be used for an argument to support or disprove and idea of appeasement?
This statement can be used to support the idea that the Munich Agreement was unnecessary and ineffective as an act of appeasement.
The Czech defenses were strong enough to resist German aggression and that there were German generals willing to take action against Hitler if he continued his march towards war.
It implies that appeasing Hitler through the Munich Agreement was unnecessary and that a different approach could have been taken to prevent the outbreak of World War II.
Supporting the argument against appeasement:
Unnecessary:
The statement indicates that the Czech defenses were formidable, suggesting that military resistance could have been a viable alternative to appeasement.
German Generals:
It suggests that there were elements within Germany itself, represented by the German generals, who recognized Hitler's aggressiveness and were prepared to act against him.
This implies that diplomatic negotiations and appeasement might not have been the only course of action.
On the other hand it's important to note that the effectiveness of the Czech defenses and the willingness of German generals to remove Hitler are debatable and dependent on specific historical context.
It is also crucial to consider the broader political climate at the time including the desire to avoid another devastating war following World War I.
This statement can be used as an argument to disprove the idea of appeasement by highlighting potential alternatives and questioning the necessity and effectiveness of the Munich Agreement in preventing the outbreak of World War II.
For similar questions on appeasement
https://brainly.com/question/482531
#SPJ11
Why was the Nationalist Party more popular in China’s cities than in the countryside?
A.Wealthy people who supported the party were concentrated in cities.
B.People in the countryside were less active in politics than people in the city.
C.Poor city dwellers hoped the Nationalist Party would bring economic change.
D.The Nationalist Party threatened to end crop trade with Western nations.
The Nationalist Party, also known as the Kuomintang (KMT), was more popular in China's cities than in the countryside for a few reasons. One reason is that wealthy people who supported the party were concentrated in cities, so the party had more resources and influence there. Additionally, people in the cities tended to be more politically active and aware of current events than people in rural areas. Finally, many poor city dwellers hoped that the Nationalist Party would bring economic change and improve their livelihoods. Therefore, option A is the correct answer. Option B is incorrect because people in the countryside were not necessarily less active in politics, but they may have been less exposed to political movements and parties due to their isolation and lack of access to education and information. Option C is correct but incomplete, as it explains one of the reasons why poor city dwellers supported the Nationalist Party. Option D is incorrect because the Nationalist Party did not threaten to end crop trade with Western nations.
how did los angeles epitomize the new emphasis on the car in 1950s america?
Numerous films in the new "road picture" genre, which featured slick cars racing along Los Angeles highways, were produced by Hollywood filmmakers.
In the 1950s, fast food franchises, drive-in movie theatres, and motels were all made possible by the accessibility and pervasiveness of automobiles. People could disperse and leave cities with cars, resulting in the development of suburbs, shopping centres, and roads. In the 1950s, the automobile stood for individual freedom and a brand-new frontier.
Describe the expected responsibilities and goals for women in the 1950s social conservatism. Despite a significant decline in female employment during WWII, that amount was surpassed by 1955. But they were no longer taking the place of men in the labour by operating heavy machinery in factories.
To know more about Los Angeles:
https://brainly.com/question/8875212
#SPJ4
in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, which balkan state most threatened the unity of the austrian-hungarian empire?:
In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, the Balkan state that most threatened the unity of the Austrian-Hungarian Empire was Serbia.
The Serbs sought to create a Greater Serbia by expanding their borders to include Bosnia and Herzegovina, which were under Austrian-Hungarian rule. This caused tensions between Serbia and the Empire, which ultimately led to the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand and the start of World War I.
In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, the Balkan state that most threatened the unity of the Austrian-Hungarian Empire was Serbia. Serbia's nationalist aspirations and territorial ambitions, along with its desire for independence, posed a significant threat to the stability and unity of the empire during that time period.
To know more about Austrian-Hungarian Empire visit:
https://brainly.com/question/518139
#SPJ11
BRAINLIEST PLS HELP!!!
Your article must be at least 3 paragraphs and include:
Explanation of what happened that day.
A detailed description of what the scene was like in the city of Moscow. How big was the crowd? How did people feel? (Note that this is one of the first events in this course for which you can find archived video news clips to truly see what it looked like that day!)
At least three major events that led to the fall of the Soviet Union. How did these events inspire other protests?
What does this mean for the future of this country and other countries?
The report and the title is given below: Title: Moscow's Historic Day: The Fall of the Soviet Union
The Article explaining the fall of the Soviet UnionOn a momentous day in Moscow, the Soviet Union witnessed a turning point in its history. On [specific date], thousands of determined protesters gathered in the city, demanding political reforms and an end to the oppressive regime.
The scene was marked by an overwhelming crowd, stretching across the streets, as people expressed their hope and urgency for change. Archived video news clips vividly captured the magnitude of the movement.
Three major events contributed to the Soviet Union's fall. An economic crisis, characterized by scarcity and inflation, eroded government confidence. Democratic movements and nationalist sentiments in Baltic states and other regions amplified calls for change. The August Coup of 1991, led by hardliners, backfired and spurred widespread opposition, igniting protests nationwide.
Moscow's events showcased the power of collective action, prompting political, economic, and social transformations in Russia and neighboring countries. This historic shift reshaped the future of these nations and their international relationships.
Read more about Soviet Union here:
https://brainly.com/question/1310325
#SPJ1
in '1984,' what economic system is at the heart of oceania's totalitarian state?
In George Orwell's novel '1984,' the economic system at the heart of Oceania's totalitarian state is a form of state-controlled socialism. The government, led by the Party, controls every aspect of economic life in Oceania, including production, distribution, and consumption.
The Party's primary objective is to maintain power and control over the population, and it does so by manipulating the economy to serve its interests. The economy in Oceania is structured around the principle of 'warfare socialism,' which means that the country is in a constant state of war, and resources are allocated to support the war effort. The government controls all aspects of production and consumption, and citizens are expected to work for the collective good. The Party uses economic propaganda to control the population, using slogans like "war is peace," "freedom is slavery," and "ignorance is strength" to maintain its grip on power. In this way, the economic system in Oceania is just one tool in the Party's arsenal of control, designed to keep the population obedient and submissive.
Learn more about oceania's here: brainly.com/question/4286358
#SPJ11
.In 1970, Americans drank more coffee than any other nonalcoholic beverage product. By 2009,
A. per capita coffee consumption had doubled.
B. Americans drank approximately twice as many gallons of soft drinks as compared to coffee.
C. more tea was consumed than coffee.
D. energy drinks were more popular than coffee.
In 1970, coffee was the most consumed nonalcoholic beverage in America. However, by 2009, per capita coffee consumption had doubled, and Americans still drank more soft drinks than coffee. Tea consumption had increased, but it was still not as popular as coffee.
Energy drinks had also gained popularity, but they did not surpass coffee consumption. In 1970, coffee was the preferred nonalcoholic beverage for Americans. It was consumed more than any other nonalcoholic beverage, including soft drinks, tea, and energy drinks. However, by 2009, the trend had changed. Per capita coffee consumption had doubled, indicating that coffee remained a popular choice. Nevertheless, Americans still drank approximately twice as many gallons of soft drinks as compared to coffee. This change could be attributed to various reasons, such as the increasing availability of soft drinks, aggressive marketing by soft drink companies, and changing consumer preferences. Tea consumption had also increased, but it was still not as popular as coffee. Tea is often viewed as a healthier alternative to coffee and soft drinks, and many people have started consuming it for its health benefits. However, coffee still remained the most consumed nonalcoholic beverage in America. Energy drinks had also gained popularity in recent years, but they did not surpass coffee consumption. Energy drinks are often marketed as an alternative to coffee, but they are more popular among younger people who want an energy boost. Overall, coffee remained a popular choice among Americans, and its consumption had doubled from 1970 to 2009.
Learn more about Energy drinks here: brainly.com/question/30730705
#SPJ11
between 1865 and 1900, immigrants to the united states who settled on the great plains
Answer:
"- came largely from Germany, the British Isles, and Canada. In the years following the Civil War, weekly and monthly magazines: soared in number as illiteracy decreased and the publishing industry advanced."
Not sure what the question was but i hope the helps?
PLS HELP!!!!!!!! LAST POINTS HELP!!!!!!!!!
Why is it important that people use fewer non-renewable resources and more renewable resources?
Your Opinion
State your opinion on the question above.
Evidence
What evidence or reasons can you gather to support your opinion?
Using fewer non-renewable resources and more renewable resources is crucial for environmental sustainability, reducing pollution, and conserving finite resources.
The importance of utilizing fewer non-renewable resources and more renewable resources lies in the long-term sustainability of our planet.
Non-renewable resources, such as fossil fuels, are finite and their extraction and use contribute significantly to pollution and climate change. In contrast, renewable resources like solar, wind, and hydro power are abundant and have a lower environmental impact.
Shifting to renewable resources helps reduce greenhouse gas emissions, decrease air and water pollution, and conserve non-renewable resources for future generations.
Ultimately, this transition supports a more sustainable, environmentally responsible, and economically viable future.
For more such questions on resources, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/5322091
#SPJ11
what is a political party
Explanation:
It is an organization that coordinates candidates to compete in a particular country's elections.
Don't argue pliz
a worker born in 1967 is a member of the _____ age/generational group.
A worker born in 1967 would belong to the Generation X age/generational group. This group is typically defined as those born between the mid-1960s and early 1980s.
Generation X grew up in a time of significant social and economic change, including the rise of personal computers and the internet, the fall of the Soviet Union, and the increasing globalization of the world economy. They are often described as being independent and self-reliant, as they came of age during a time of economic uncertainty and rapid change. Members of Generation X have been called the "forgotten middle child" between the larger Baby Boomer and Millennial generations. They tend to be skeptical of institutions and are known for their work ethic and focus on individual achievement. As a result, they have been dubbed the "MTV Generation" because of their early exposure to music videos and other media that catered to their youth culture. Many Generation Xers have experienced significant career and financial challenges, including the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis, and rising student loan debt.
Learn more about Generation Xers here: brainly.com/question/26408615
#SPJ11
who benefitted the most from the battle of saratoga, the patriots or the british?
The Battle of Saratoga was a crucial turning point in the American Revolution and it is generally considered that the Patriots (the American forces) benefited the most from this battle.
The British had hoped to crush the Patriot forces and gain control of New York and New England by dividing the colonies in two. However, the Patriots' victory at Saratoga prevented the British from achieving their objectives.
The battle marked the first time that a large British army was forced to surrender, which boosted the morale of the Patriots and convinced France to enter the war on their side.
The French alliance provided the Patriots with much-needed military and financial support that played a critical role in their ultimate victory over the British.
In summary, the Battle of Saratoga was a significant victory for the Patriots, as it not only prevented the British from achieving their objectives, but also brought France into the war, which greatly increased the chances of an American victory.
To know more about Saratoga refer here
https://brainly.com/question/8866371#
#SPJ11
what event caused the arrival of thousands of french-speaking settlers in louisiana in the 1700s?
The event that led to the arrival of thousands of French-speaking settlers in Louisiana in the 1700s was the transfer of the territory from France to Spain under the Treaty of Fontainebleau in 1762. This transfer caused concerns among the French colonists who feared losing their rights and privileges.
As a result, many French-speaking settlers migrated to Louisiana to maintain their French culture and way of life. The transfer of Louisiana from France to Spain in the 1700s prompted the arrival of numerous French-speaking settlers in the region. In 1762, under the Treaty of Fontainebleau, France ceded the Louisiana territory to Spain as a result of their defeat in the Seven Years' War. The news of this transfer caused anxiety among the French colonists residing in Louisiana, as they were uncertain about their future under Spanish rule. They feared losing their French identity, language, and the rights and privileges they enjoyed as French subjects. In response to these concerns, many French-speaking settlers decided to leave the territory and relocate to French-controlled regions, such as French Canada and the French West Indies. However, Spain sought to encourage the French settlers to stay in Louisiana, as they recognized the economic and strategic value of the territory. In order to retain the French-speaking population, Spain implemented policies that aimed to protect their rights and preserve their cultural practices. These efforts included allowing the French settlers to continue using French civil law, practice Catholicism, and maintain their social customs. The combination of Spain's efforts to accommodate the French settlers and the desire of the colonists to maintain their French culture and way of life led to a significant influx of French-speaking immigrants to Louisiana. These newcomers brought with them their language, traditions, and expertise in agriculture, contributing to the growth and development of the region. The arrival of thousands of French-speaking settlers in Louisiana in the 1700s can be attributed to the transfer of the territory from France to Spain and the subsequent concerns and uncertainties faced by the French colonists.
Learn more about Treaty of Fontainebleau here: brainly.com/question/14673464
#SPJ11
why were china, brazil and india exempt from meeting emissions reductions in the kyoto treaty?
Kyoto treaty was designed to be a legally binding agreement on the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions for industrialized countries, but developing countries such as China, Brazil, and India were not required to meet emissions reductions under the protocol.
The Kyoto Protocol, adopted in 1997, was an international treaty aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions in order to mitigate global climate change. It was designed to be a legally binding agreement on the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions for industrialized countries, but developing countries such as China, Brazil, and India were not required to meet emissions reductions under the protocol.
One of the main reasons for exempting these countries was the principle of "common but differentiated responsibilities" in international climate negotiations.
This principle recognizes that developed countries are historically responsible for the majority of global greenhouse gas emissions, and therefore have a greater responsibility to reduce emissions and provide financial and technological support to developing countries in their efforts to address climate change.
China, Brazil, and India are among the world's largest developing countries, with rapidly growing economies and significant populations.
Their exemption from emissions reductions under the Kyoto Protocol was based on the understanding that their primary responsibility was to address poverty alleviation and economic development in their own countries, and that mandatory emissions reductions would hinder their ability to achieve these goals.
However, it's worth noting that these countries did take voluntary actions to reduce emissions during the Kyoto Protocol period and have since become major players in global efforts to address climate change.
Today, all three countries have committed to ambitious emissions reduction targets under the Paris Agreement, which succeeded the Kyoto Protocol as the main international agreement on climate change.
To know more about greenhouse gas refer here
https://brainly.com/question/30674591#
#SPJ11
which of the following was a consequence of mansa musa's pilgrimage to mecca in 1324–1325?
Mansa Musa's pilgrimage to Mecca in 1324-1325 had significant consequences. One consequence was the spread of Islam and increased cultural exchange throughout West Africa.
Another consequence was the economic impact, as Mansa Musa's extravagant spending during his journey caused a temporary devaluation of gold in the regions he passed through. Mansa Musa's pilgrimage to Mecca had a profound impact on the spread of Islam and cultural exchange in West Africa. As the ruler of the Mali Empire, Mansa Musa's journey introduced Islam to new areas and influenced the adoption of Islamic practices and beliefs by the people he encountered. This pilgrimage facilitated the establishment of closer ties between the Mali Empire and other Islamic states, promoting cultural and intellectual exchange, as well as facilitating the spread of Arabic language and Islamic education. Furthermore, Mansa Musa's lavish spending during his pilgrimage caused a temporary economic disruption. He distributed gold generously along his route, particularly in Egypt, where he spent large amounts. Mansa Musa's immense wealth and generosity led to an influx of gold that temporarily devalued the currency in the areas he visited. This devaluation had both positive and negative effects. On one hand, it stimulated trade and economic activity in those regions, as people took advantage of the abundance of gold. On the other hand, it also disrupted local economies and led to inflationary pressures. Overall, Mansa Musa's pilgrimage to Mecca had far-reaching consequences, including the spread of Islam and increased cultural exchange, as well as temporary economic disruptions due to his lavish spending and the devaluation of gold in the regions he passed through.
Learn more about spread of Islam here: brainly.com/question/11566536
#SPJ11
.Which of the following was not a major thrust of expanded federal activity during the war?
1. promotion of westward expansion
2. restriction of public expression
3. issuance of paper money
4. protection of labor's right to organize
The major thrusts of expanded federal activity during the war included the promotion of westward expansion, the restriction of public expression, and the issuance of paper money. However, the protection of labor's right to organize was not a significant focus of the federal government during this period.
During the war, the federal government played a crucial role in various aspects of the nation's development and control. One major thrust was the promotion of westward expansion. The government enacted policies and provided incentives to encourage settlement and development of the western territories, such as the Homestead Act of 1862, which granted land to settlers. This expansion was seen as crucial for economic growth and securing American dominance over the continent. Another major thrust of expanded federal activity was the restriction of public expression. The government implemented measures to suppress dissent and maintain national unity during the war. The most notable example was the passage of the Espionage Act of 1917 and the Sedition Act of 1918, which aimed to curb anti-war sentiments and punish those who engaged in disloyal or seditious activities. The issuance of paper money was also a significant focus of federal activity during the war. The government needed to finance the war effort and stimulate the economy, so it printed and circulated large amounts of paper currency. This expansion of the money supply helped fund the war and support economic growth. However, the protection of labor's right to organize was not a major thrust of expanded federal activity during the war. While there were some developments in labor rights during this period, such as the creation of the National War Labor Board to mediate labor disputes, the primary focus was on mobilizing and coordinating industrial production for the war rather than advancing labor rights. The protection of labor's right to organize gained more prominence in the following years, particularly with the passage of significant labor legislation in the 1930s, such as the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). In summary, the major thrusts of expanded federal activity during the war included the promotion of westward expansion, the restriction of public expression, and the issuance of paper money. The protection of labor's right to organize, while not entirely absent, was not a central focus of federal efforts during this period.
Learn more about Homestead Act here: brainly.com/question/10390487
#SPJ11
reed v. reed (1971) was about the 14th amendment and a. reproductive rights.b. right to marry.c. voting rights.d. sex discrimination.
The option D, sex discrimination. Reed v. Reed (1971) was a landmark case that addressed sex discrimination in the context of the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment.
The case involved a dispute over who should be appointed as administrator of a deceased son's estate. The Idaho law at the time gave preference to men over women in such cases, which was challenged by the mother, Sally Reed. The Supreme Court ruled that the law was unconstitutional as it violated the Equal Protection Clause, and set a precedent for future cases addressing gender discrimination.
Reed v. Reed was a landmark Supreme Court case in which the court ruled that the 14th Amendment's Equal Protection Clause prohibits laws that discriminate based on sex. In this case, an Idaho law favored men over women when it came to appointing administrators for estates.
To Know more about Equal Protection
https://brainly.com/question/30190596
#SPJ11
how did the spread of public schools in the 1820s and 1830s change teaching?
The spread of public schools in the 1820s and 1830s significantly changed teaching by increasing the demand for trained teachers and creating a need for standardized curriculum and teaching methods.
What were the methods?Teachers had to adapt to the large class sizes and diverse student populations, which required them to become more organized and efficient in their teaching approach.
The introduction of state-funded schools also paved the way for the implementation of compulsory education laws, which ensured that all children had access to education.
This, in turn, created a more literate population and provided individuals with the necessary skills to participate in the growing economy.
Overall, the spread of public schools transformed teaching by making it more accessible, standardized, and formalized.
To know more on Public Schools visit:
https://brainly.com/question/32002855
#SPJ11
The American System sought to bring the United States together through the construction of
, and the use of the regional economies of the North, South, and West.
By building infrastructure like roads, canals, and trains and utilizing the local economies of the North, South, and West, the American System aimed to unite the country.
Henry Clay suggested the concept in the early 19th century as a means of fostering both national harmony and economic progress. The American System sought to facilitate the movement of commodities across the nation and promote increased trade and economic growth by enhancing transportation and communication networks. It also aimed to encourage a division of labor among the several regions, with the North specializing in manufacturing, the South in agriculture, and the West in natural resources.
Learn more about American System here:
https://brainly.com/question/14537327
#SPJ1
