Answer:
McKeiver v. PennsylvaniaIn 1971, the U.S. Supreme Court held that there's no jury-trial right in juvenile delinquency proceedings.
Explanation:
what can congress do if the supreme court declares a law unconstitutional
Answer:
The law is nullified
Explanation:
Congress can get around a Court ruling by passing a new law or changing a law ruled unconstitutional.
Congress can modify the law or create a new one. This way they can dodge the unconstitutional declaration.
I hope this helps! :)
The O.J. Simpson case demonstrates the principle of being tried twice for the same crime, once in criminal court and once in civil court. Since these were separate proceedings, they did not violate which principle of the Fifth Amendment?
Answer:
the right to not be tried for the same crime twice in the same court.
ANSWER PLS
Question 11
Education
1 pts
A common criticism of the Supreme Court regarding its
willingness to strike down laws made by elected officials,
as well as to overturn past precedents, is known as:
Center
ing
O Original intent
Eker
O Judicial activism
O Judicial prudence
O Judicial restraint
Answer:
it's B I think I don't know man I'm just a kid and life is a nightmare
How does your state determine how many Electoral votes each candidate will get?
What is the law that explains how matter on earth is conserved, even if it changes form and composition?.
Answer:
The Law of Conservation of Mass?
Explanation:
According to a quick internet search, it's called The Law of Conservation of Mass.
Answer:
The Law of Conservation of Mass?
Explanation:
According to a quick internet search, it's called The Law of Conservation of Mass.
Explanation:
Which act made interstate transportation of a stolen motor vehicle a federal crime and allowed for federal help in prosecuting such cases
Answer:
The Dyer Act
Explanation:
The Dyer Act made interstate transportation of a stolen vehicle a federal crime and allowed for federal help in prosecuting such cases.
What is domestic law.
2. Explain a reason why an offer may be refused. (1 point)
Answer: If your home purchase offer was rejected, it was likely from a reason involving money.
Explanation:
As Commander In Chief, the President has the ability to do which of the following?
a. Give executive Orders
b. Decide the use of the military
c. Helps make treaties
d. Grants commutations, amnesty, and pardons
Answer:
all of them
Explanation:
"to make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing powers, and all other power vested by this constitution. " alexander hamilton used the clause above to.
The clause was used by Alexander Hamilton in order to convince the federal government to create the First Bank of the United States.
Alexander Hamilton was an American statesman and was also one of the founding fathers. He was influential and was a promoter of the United States constitution.
One of the vital clauses in the Constitution was "make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing powers". This law was used by Alexander Hamilton when he wanted the first bank to be created.
Read related link on:
https://brainly.com/question/25685887
The driver with a false sense of confidence may drive ____,  feeling that he or she is in total control
The driver with a false sense of confidence may drive Reckless, feeling that he or she is in total control. A significant traffic infraction where the driver of a vehicle drives very recklessly causes accidents or causes other harm. He is accused of operating a vehicle recklessly and causing fatalities.
What are the possible effects of driving recklessly?At best, a misdemeanor charge, a fine, or even jail time could result from irresponsible driving. In the worst case, innocent lives might be impacted. Another issue to think about is the correlation between speeding fines and higher insurance rates.
Reckless driving refers to operating a vehicle while exhibiting a purposeful or wanton disregard for consequences or other road users' safety. When you receive a traffic ticket, it is likely because you disobeyed the law of the road and either caused an accident or property damage, or you may not have.
Learn more about Reckless Driving here:
https://brainly.com/question/28051699
#SPJ5
Do you think a government could function without the Departments? Why or why not?
at least a paragraph and full detail.
please
Answer: Yes&No depends on the kind of government we are trying to become.
Explanation:
in a court opinion this term is used to describe the courts answer to the issue it was asked to dcide
Answer:
a judicial opinion :)
Explanation:
What is a court decision?
The legal reasoning justifying why a party won the case.
The court's decision of who won the case.
The plurality opinion of most justices on the Court.
Answer:
The legal reasoning justifying why a party won the case.
In which case did the U.S. Supreme Court hold that the defendant has the right to counsel during the course of any police interrogation
In Michigan v. Jackson, 475 U.S. 625 (1986), the Supreme Court held that the Sixth Amendment bars the police from initiating any interrogation of a defendant who has been formally charged and who has requested the right to counsel.
the name of the law that enforced prohibition was known as
Answer:
the 18th Amendment
Opinion-based question: When facing legal action, should teenagers be held to the same standard as adults? Please explain your answer using reasoning, personal knowledge, and current events.
Just answer the question, please. Don't send the homework link 'cuz I can't access it at all. Use the answer from whatever link you got it from so I can get my homework done.
Answer:
Unless the teenagers do something really bad like so bad that they have to be in prison for 30-35 years then yeah they shouldn't be punished like adults do
Explanation:
What is a Bureaucracy?
a. The Constitution and the three branches of government
b. All of the agencies, people, and procedures that make the government operate
c. The Senate and House
d. The President and his advisors
Answer:
Letter A
Explanation:
#Carry me on learning
What is the order of Succession for the Presidency?
a. Vice President, Speaker of the House, President Pro Temp
b. Speaker of the House, President Pro Temp, Vice President
c. Vice President, Secretary of State, Speaker of the House
d. Vice President, Speaker of the House, Secretary of State
Answer:
A
Explanation:
Order of Presidential Succession
Vice President, Speaker of the House, President pro tempore of the Senate.
what is law? what is the main function of law
Answer:
Law set up rules and regulations for society so that we can freedom, gives Justice to those who were wronged, and it set up that it protects us from our own Government
Answer:
Law set up rules and regulations for society so that we can freedom, gives Justice to those who were wronged, and it set up that it protects us from our own Government
Explanation:
Guy above me is right! Thanks guy who answerd before me! :D
1. What issue matters to you? 2. How can this issue be addressed by a law or legal measure? 3. Can you explain why this issue should matter to other people? explain the issue you want to address.
Answer:
Explanation: the issue that matters to me is racism. It effects me because I'm
South Asian. It effects other people because if your black u get blamed for etc.
What are two facts about the president cabinet
Answer:
What are the two main roles of the President Cabinet?
The two roles of the Cabinet secretaries are to advise the president and serve as the administrative head of his/her department.
Explanation:
When asked about the possible motive for a homicide, an innocent person would most likely
Say nothing
Say "I don’t know"
Speculate that it was a revenge killing
Say "It wasn’t me"
The Second Amendment is an important part of the Constitution. For this assignment you will need to read the Second Amendment and the secondary source Know Your Rights: A Guide to the United States Constitution to help you answer the following prompt:
“Does the text of the Second Amendment mean that the right to 'bear arms' is unlimited?”
As you prepare to answer this prompt you should follow the format provided below.
Paragraph 1 - Analyze the text of the Second Amendment for yourselves. In order to analyze you should look at each word in the amendment and decide how each part of the amendment relates to the prompt.
Paragraph 2 - Summarize and cite the ideas and information from the secondary sources to provide support for your conclusion in paragraph 1.
Paragraph 3 – Summarize and cite the ideas and information in the secondary sources that go against your conclusions in paragraph 1.
Paragraph 4 – Write an analysis about the strength of the arguments that support or counter their own opinions. You will need to provide an explanation of your thinking about which opinions are stronger by citing specific textual evidence out of the primary and secondary sources.
Answer:
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Syllabus
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ET AL. v. HELLER
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
No. 07–290. Argued March 18, 2008—Decided June 26, 2008
District of Columbia law bans handgun possession by making it a crime
to carry an unregistered firearm and prohibiting the registration of
handguns; provides separately that no person may carry an unlicensed handgun, but authorizes the police chief to issue 1-year licenses; and requires residents to keep lawfully owned firearms
unloaded and disassembled or bound by a trigger lock or similar device. Respondent Heller, a D. C. special policeman, applied to register a handgun he wished to keep at home, but the District refused.
He filed this suit seeking, on Second Amendment grounds, to enjoin
the city from enforcing the bar on handgun registration, the licensing
requirement insofar as it prohibits carrying an unlicensed firearm in
the home, and the trigger-lock requirement insofar as it prohibits the
use of functional firearms in the home. The District Court dismissed
the suit, but the D. C. Circuit reversed, holding that the Second
Amendment protects an individual’s right to possess firearms and
that the city’s total ban on handguns, as well as its requirement that
firearms in the home be kept nonfunctional even when necessary for
Explanation:
Alma Tirtsche (1921)
Alma Tirtsche's beaten body was found wrapped in a blanket in what is known as Gun
Alley in Melbourne, Australia. Because the body was relatively free of blood, the police
deduced that she had been murdered elsewhere and brought to the alley. Ger body had
been washed before being wrapped in the blanket. A local bar owner, Colin Ross, was
questioned. Ross admitted seeing Tirtsche in his bar earlier in the day.
Investigators collected blankets from Ross's home and found several strands of long,
reddish blonde hair on them. The length of the hair implied it had come from a female,
and the concentration of pigment in the hair implied a younger woman. Some of the
ends of the hair were irregular, implying the hair had been forcibly broken off. The
physical similarity of the hair found on the blanket with that of Alma Tirtschke convinced
the jury that Ross was the murderer. This was the first time that hair was used to secure
a conviction in Australia. Unfortunately, analysis of the hairs 75 years later showed that
two of the strands found on the blankets came from different individuals, which throws
doubt on Ross's guilt.
3. What other characteristics of the hair could the investigators have examined
(besides the length and color) to determine if they had come from the same
person, and that that person was Tirtsche?
The other characteristics of the hair that could be examined are genetic analysis of Alma Tirtsche's hair and the strands.
Who is Alma Tirtsche?The Gun Alley Murder occurred in Melbourne, Australia, in 1921 when 12-year-old Alma Tirtschke was raped and killed. Due to the fact that she went to Hawthorn West High School and was last seen alive near a bar, the Australian Wine Saloon, her murder generated a lot of media attention.
The case has gained notoriety more subsequently for being a miscarriage of justice. Colin Campbell Ross, then 29 years old, was found guilty of killing Tirtschke and put to death, but he maintained his innocence all the way to the end. Ross's innocence was established by DNA evidence when the case was reexamined decades later, and he was given a posthumous pardon in 2008. Since Ross's arrest, Tirtschke's family has maintained that Ross is innocent and that the proper person was found guilty of killing Tirtschke.
To learn more about genetic analysis visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28265289
#SPJ9
Standard probation conditions are applied
in cases involving juveniles
in all cases
is cases of minor crimes
in severe cases
Standard probation conditions are applied in cases that involve Juvenile. So, option A is correct. Standard Probation conditions are applied in cases involving Juveniles.
Though Juvenile probation is a more suitable option than out-of-home placement, a probation sentence still restricts the liberty of a juvenile offender. Juvenile probation programs are ideally established to assist young individuals in correcting their behaviors without removing them from their gatherings.
Juvenile probation is a form of community supervision that may include reporting to a supervisory officer, participation in behavior-modification programming, paying restitution to the victim, testing for drug use, or other conditions. Failure to comply with these conditions may result in a probation violation, which may lead to additional terms, incarceration, or other sanctions or incentives to improve behavior.
Learn more about Juvenile probation:
brainly.com/question/15135398
#SPJ1
Answer:
In all cases
Explanation:
This is because they are the common barriers and rules
Which is an example of a draft?
O A. Teller's check
B. Signed contract
C. Certificate of deposit
D. Promissory notes
Answer:
D, i hope you have a good rest of your day and find out the right answer.
Explanation:
What is the relationship between the
police power and the subordination of personal
desires and interests to the public good?
Answer:
Use of power creates conflicts with civil liberty protections, if this happens, court must strike a balance between the needs of society and of individual freedoms on the other.
Explanation:
when does the supreme court have original jurisdiction over a case?
Study the diagram below and answer the following question.
Which U.S. Court belongs in the empty box in the diagram?
U.S. District Court
Trial Court
Magistrate Court
Municipal Court
I think it's "trial court" or else municipal court
Explanation:
hope it helps follow thnx
U.S. District Court
In the U.S we have a Dual Court system, we go from state into federal. We start with State District courts, State Court of Appeals, State Supreme Court, then we switch to federal to get U.S. District Court , U.S Court of appeals, and Finally the U.S Supreme Court.
I hope this helps! :)
