One of the major characteristics of comedy is that the audience laughs. Comedy is a genre of drama that is meant to entertain and amuse through its humor and wit. The Correct option is C
It often features exaggerated characters and situations that are designed to evoke laughter and provide a lighthearted escape from everyday life. While some forms of comedy may include conflicts between characters or the defeat of an antagonist, the overall tone is typically light and humorous rather than serious or dramatic.
Ultimately, the goal of comedy is to make the audience laugh and leave them feeling uplifted and entertained.
Learn more about major characteristics
https://brainly.com/question/26820782
#SPJ4
Montag mentions that Clarisse is more mature than his wife. In what ways is Clarisse mature, and in what ways is Montag’s wife immature? Provide examples from the text to support your answers. What do their differences tell you about the state of society in the novel?
1. In Ray Bradbury's Fahrenheit 451, Clarisse is portrayed as a free-spirited and curious individual, while Montag's wife, Mildred, is depicted as someone who is more interested in her TV "family" than her actual family.
Clarisse is mature in that she has an independent and critical mind. She asks Montag thought-provoking questions, and she is not afraid to speak her mind. She also has a deep appreciation for nature, and she notices the small things in life that many people take for granted.
For instance, she tells Montag, "I sometimes think drivers don't know what grass is, or flowers, because they never see them slowly," (Bradbury, 9).
2. On the other hand, Mildred is depicted as immature because she is completely immersed in her own world of technology and entertainment.
She is addicted to her "Seashell" radio, which she listens to all day long, and she is constantly watching the "parlor walls," which are giant TV screens that cover the walls of her living room.
She has no interest in engaging in meaningful conversation with Montag or exploring the world around her. She is even willing to take pills to forget her problems rather than facing them head-on.
3. The disparities between Clarisse and Mildred show how society is today in the book. Society is portrayed as being overly dependent on technology and entertainment, lacking in critical thought and real personal connection.
Clarisse stands for a way of life that is no longer practised in this culture—a manner that values curiosity, interpersonal connection, and the natural world. Mildred, in comparison, is a personification of the void and shallowness of the society the novel portrays.
The disparities between these two personas show the glaring discrepancy between the two worldviews and draw attention to the negative effects of society's fixation on technology and entertainment.
Learn more about Ray Bradbury here:
brainly.com/question/822401
#SPJ4
Mina is 13. She meets a friend online and believes she is in love. Soon, he begins demanding that she travel to a nearby town so they can meet. What kind of online sexual solicitation is this?
Answer:
Online grooming
Explanation:
This instance exemplifies the grave issue of online grooming, a nefarious form of online sexual solicitation. The perpetrator is craftily exerting control and fostering a bond with Mina, with the ulterior motive of arranging a physical encounter for sexual gratification. It is paramount for Mina to comprehend the inherent hazards of rendezvousing with an unknown online individual and to seek counsel from a reliable authority figure. Additionally, it is crucial to bear in mind that any sexual conduct involving a minor is not only against the law but also carries severe implications for all the parties involved.
A sword master childhood friend power harassed me harshly, so i broke off our relationship and made a fresh start at the frontier as a magic swordsman.
After experiencing power harassment from a sword master childhood friend, you chose to break off the relationship and start anew as a magic swordsman at the frontier. This decision allowed you to move forward and grow both personally and professionally.
To address this situation, let's break it down step-by-step:
1. A sword master childhood friend power harassed you harshly: This means that your childhood friend, who was skilled in swordsmanship, treated you poorly and exerted their power over you in a negative manner.
2. You broke off your relationship: In response to the power harassment, you decided to end your relationship with this person to protect yourself and maintain your well-being.
3. You made a fresh start at the frontier as a magic swordsman: After ending the relationship, you chose to begin anew in a different environment, pursuing the path of a magic swordsman. This path combines the art of swordsmanship with magical abilities, offering a unique and powerful skill set.
Learn more about harassment here:
https://brainly.com/question/30046730
#SPJ11
What does Mark Twain mean by the notice "Persons attempting to find a motive in this narrative will be prosecuted; persons attempting to find a moral in it will be banished; persons attempting to find a plot in it will be shot"?
Mark Twain's notice means that readers should not try to find a motive, moral, or plot in his narrative, as doing so would result in prosecution, banishment, or being shot.
This statement suggests that the author wants readers to enjoy the story without overanalyzing it.
In a more detailed explanation, Twain's notice is a tongue-in-cheek warning to readers, asking them to take the narrative at face value and not search for hidden meanings or intentions.
By using humor and exaggeration, he aims to dissuade readers from scrutinizing the story too closely.
Twain's intent is for readers to experience the narrative as a simple, entertaining tale without dissecting its literary elements or trying to find a deeper significance. The notice serves as a reminder to appreciate the story as it is, without attaching unnecessary weight to it.
To know more about tongue-in-cheek click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/30386253#
#SPJ11
house divided give me liberty or give me death essay
"House Divided" and "Give Me Liberty or Give Me Death" are two separate speeches given by two different historical figures, although both are important pieces of American history.
House Divided" was a speech delivered by Abraham Lincoln on June 16, 1858, as he accepted the Republican nomination for the Illinois Senate. In this speech, Lincoln spoke about the issue of slavery in the United States, stating that "a house divided against itself cannot stand" and that he believed the nation could not continue to exist as both a free and slave-holding society. On the other hand, "Give Me Liberty or Give Me Death" was a speech delivered by Patrick Henry on March 23, 1775, at the Virginia Convention in Richmond.
Learn more about A "House Divided" and "Give Me Liberty or Give Me Death here.
https://brainly.com/question/30497948
#SPJ1
which selection from the article best explains how jaylen smith is making progress as mayor
Jaylen Smith Mayor is still 18 year old and has made many public services that has brought motivation in many young minds and has improved the mindset of the new generation.
Jaylen Smith became the mayor of the Earle at his early age of 18 years and he also the youngest mayor to be elected from the United States. So he is considered as the history creator to work as the young mayor for the Kansas City. He was born and bought up from a very small town and then had a dream to bring the freedom and rights to the black people so he started to lead the community of 1800 members. The news of Jaylen becoming the youngest mayor was also shown in the repots and CNN news shows.
He was determinant and always worked for the benefits of his community, he also wanted to bring the sense of equality in US and also for supported for the justice of every citizen in his country. As a young mayor he created a record and notified for many changes in his community and also supported for the good over evil.
To know more about Jaylen Smith is making progress as mayor follow the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/31515208
#SPJ1
The correct question must include:
According to the article, what did Smith do to learn how to be a mayor?
(I’ll mark brainliest) 1. Describe the topic of your speech, one that affects you personally. What is your opinion on the topic?
2. In about one paragraph, tell the story of your experience with the topic you selected for question 1. Your story might be your overall history with the issue or a single anecdote that illustrates your experience .
3. Do some research on your topic. Then, state your opinion as a claim with at least two supporting reasons. Write them below .
4. Continue to do research so you can find at least one piece of evidence to back up each supporting reason. In the space below, show how the evidence and supporting reasons are connected. Also write some information about each source where you found the evidence such as the author, title, and URL (web address) or page number so you can find it later.
Evidence for reason:1
Evidence for reason:2
5. Create an outline that organizes all the parts of your speech. Your outline should give you reminders about what to say in the introduction, the body (where your supporting reasons and evidence will appear), and the conclusion. Later, you can put the information from your outline on note cards if you find it helpful.
Answer:
1. The topic of my speech is the importance of mental health awareness. This topic affects me personally because I have struggled with anxiety and depression in the past, and I have seen firsthand how these conditions can impact a person's life.
2. When I was in college, I experienced a period of intense stress and anxiety. I was taking a heavy course load, working a part-time job, and dealing with personal issues at the same time. I began to feel overwhelmed and exhausted all the time, and I started to withdraw from my friends and family. Eventually, I realized that I needed help and I went to see a therapist. Through therapy and other forms of support, I was able to manage my anxiety and get back on track.
3. Claim: Mental health awareness is crucial because it can help to reduce the stigma surrounding mental illness and promote access to treatment.
Supporting reason 1: Stigma reduction. By raising awareness about mental health, we can help to break down the stereotypes and negative attitudes that people may have about mental illness. This can make it easier for individuals to seek help without fear of judgment or discrimination.
Supporting reason 2: Access to treatment. Mental health awareness can also help to increase access to treatment and support services for individuals who are struggling with mental health issues. When people are aware of the resources available to them, they may be more likely to seek help and get the support they need.
4. Evidence for reason 1: According to a study published in the journal Social Science & Medicine, public awareness campaigns that promote positive attitudes towards mental health can reduce stigma and improve help-seeking behavior among individuals with mental illness (Corrigan, 2004). Another study by the American Psychological Association found that education and awareness programs can increase knowledge about mental health and reduce negative attitudes towards individuals with mental illness (Corrigan et al., 2015).
Evidence for reason 2: Research conducted by the National Institute of Mental Health has shown that lack of awareness and stigma surrounding mental illness can contribute to delays in seeking treatment and poor treatment outcomes (National Institute of Mental Health, 2022). However, when individuals are aware of the resources available to them, they are more likely to seek help and receive appropriate treatment.
5. Outline:
I. Introduction
A. Attention-getter: Personal anecdote about struggling with mental health
B. Thesis statement: Mental health awareness is crucial because it can help to reduce the stigma surrounding mental illness and promote access to treatment.
C. Preview of supporting reasons
II. Body
A. Supporting reason 1: Stigma reduction
1. Explanation of how stigma impacts those with mental illness
2. Evidence: Studies showing the impact of public awareness campaigns on stigma reduction
3. Connection to thesis statement
B. Supporting reason 2: Access to treatment
1. Explanation of how lack of awareness and stigma can impact access to treatment
2. Evidence: Research on the impact of awareness on treatment seeking behavior
3. Connection to thesis statement
III. Conclusion
A. Restate thesis
B. Summary of supporting reasons
C. Call to action: Encourage audience to support mental health awareness initiatives.
Explanation:
Here you go
Answer:
Give first person brainliest, they deserve it!!
Explanation:
What daunting challenge did Krakauer set for himself as a young man?
He conquered the difficult task that young Krakauer set for himself: climbing the double thumb.
As he notices his peers are uneasy around him, Krakauer grows more uneasy in his capacity as a journalist. One day, Beck Weathers admits that Krakauer's presence makes him uneasy, but he also says that he doesn't believe Rob Hall is under any more stress as a result of Krakauer's presence.
"My suspicion that McCandless's death was unplanned, that it was a terrible accident, comes from reading those few documents he left behind and from listening to the men and women who spent time with him over the final year of his life," writes Jon Krakauer in Chapter 14 of Into the Wild.
Learn more about Krakauer Visit: brainly.com/question/30936019
#SPJ4
How are the two participles in this sentence used differently? The biking trail will soon be filling with riders of all ages.
One is an adjective modifier, and one is a verb.
One is an adjective modifier, and one is a past participle.
One is a present participle, and one is a main verb.
One is a helping verb and one is a main verb.
One is a present participle, and one is a past participle.
The two participles in the sentence are used differently because one is a present participle, and the other is a past participle.
The first participle, "filling," is a present participle, which means it is formed by adding "-ing" to the base form of the verb ("fill"). In this sentence, "filling" is used as part of the verb phrase "will be filling," which is in the future progressive tense. This participle is used as part of the verb phrase to describe the action that will be taking place in the future.
The second participle, "biking," is a past participle, which means it is formed by adding "-ed" to the base form of the verb ("bike"). In this sentence, "biking" is used as an adjective modifier to describe the type of trail that is being discussed. The trail is specifically designed for biking, and therefore "biking" is used to modify the noun "trail" in the sentence.
To know more about present participle, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/3005793
#SPJ1
Select the sentence in this passage that demonstrates the fallacy of evasion
The sentence "William Hammond, the surgeon general of the union army, created a new system of sanitary field care." demonstrates the fallacy of evasion.
The fallacy of evasion is when an arguer avoids dealing with the main argument and instead focuses on a minor point. In this case, William Hammond's creation of a new system of sanitary field care is used to distract from the fact that the civil war was the bloodiest conflict in the history of the United States, resulting in more than 600,000 deaths.
Although Hammond's new system of sanitary field care certainly saved some lives, it does not take away from the devastating loss of life that occurred during the civil war, and it does not change the fact that this was one of the most devastating conflicts in history.
To learn more about fallacy of evasion link is here
brainly.com/question/13279202
#SPJ1
The complete question is:
The civil war was the bloodiest conflict in the history of the united states. More than 600,000 soldiers lost their lives. The wounded often suffered acute pain in the field hospitals. William Hammond, the surgeon general of the union army, created a new system of sanitary field care. it is probable without Hammond's new system, more soldiers would have lost their lives. However, he deserves little credit, for since that time, still greater strides have been made in battlefield medicine.
Select the sentence in this passage that demonstrates the fallacy of evasion.
How does the characterization of “good mother east river” contribute to the tone of paragraph 45
The portrayal of "good mother east river" adds to the tone of section 45 on the grounds that It describes Liz's demise as a break from an existence of torment and distress. Option C is correct.
The portrayal of "good mother east river " adds to the tone of section 45 on the grounds that It describes Liz's demise as a break from an existence of torment and distress. The child was held close to his bosom by the front portion of his chest, which is defined as the human chest.
The passage 45 recounts the demise of Liz and how while she was attempting to take off from all the contention in her life and needing to be separated from her family and the family's ways she experiences with the river that would take her to her end, which is notice as the most sad, quick and fierce snapshot of her life yet the most placating and unwinding as well.
Learn more about ''good mother east river '' :
brainly.com/question/11223064
Incomplete question :
Knowing her way, and hungry for her surcease, she darted down the familiar ways until at last her feet struck the dull solidity of the rotting pier. And then it was but a few more panting steps—and good mother East River took Liz to her bosom, soothed her muddily but quickly, and settled in five minutes the problem that keeps lights burning o' nights in thousands of pastorates and colleges.
How does the characterization of “good mother east river” contribute to the tone of paragraph 45 :
A.It calls attention to Liz’s young age by suggesting that the river in which she ultimately drowns is like a mother.
B.It illustrates Liz’s strong connection to nature.
C.It characterizes Liz's death as an escape from a life of pain and sorrow.
D.It suggests the idea of a God-figure accepting Liz into her rightful place in heaven
A layered and complex plot generally requires the author to write in
first-person
limited third-person
omniscient third-person
second-person
A layered and complex plot can be effectively conveyed through a variety of narrative perspectives. However, the choice of perspective ultimately depends on the author's storytelling goals and the needs of the story.
When it comes to first-person narration, the reader is limited to the perspective and knowledge of the protagonist. This can be effective for creating a sense of intimacy with the character, but it can also limit the scope of the story. Limited third-person narration provides more flexibility, allowing the author to explore multiple characters' perspectives while still maintaining a sense of focus. Omniscient third-person narration is another option for a layered and complex plot, as it allows the author to access the thoughts and emotions of all characters. This can be useful for creating a sense of depth and complexity in the story, but it can also be challenging to maintain consistency and avoid confusion.
To know more about characters refer :
https://brainly.com/question/19295137
#SPJ11
T/F: After Jesus' resurrection, Jewish Christians began to no longer emphasize Sabbath worship services (Friday night opening and Saturday night closure) and instead focused on Sunday worship.
The given statement is "After Jesus' resurrection, Jewish Christians began to no longer emphasize Sabbath worship services (Friday night opening and Saturday night closure) and instead focused on Sunday worship" is True ( because after Jesus' resurrection, Jewish Christians began to no longer emphasize Sabbath worship services (Friday night opening and Saturday night closure) and instead focused on Sunday worship).
This shift in worship practices was due to the belief that Jesus rose from the dead on a Sunday, and it became known as the Lord's Day. This new day of worship, which was already being observed by some non-Jewish Christian communities, became the primary day of worship for Jewish Christians as well.
The book of Acts describes how the apostles met on the first day of the week to break bread (Acts 20:7), and Paul also refers to the collection of offerings being taken on the first day of the week (1 Corinthians 16:2). This shift in worship practices marked a significant change for Jewish Christians, who had previously observed the Sabbath as a holy day of rest and worship.
For more question on worship
https://brainly.com/question/3436777
#SPJ11
T/F: We know Jesus' resurrection appearances could not be reports added later because in the I Corinthians 15:3-8, the early creed predates any of the written Gospels and it makes the biggest claim of all about Jesus' appearances to 500 people.
The given statement "We know Jesus' resurrection appearances could not be reports added later because in the I Corinthians 15:3-8, the early creed predates any of the written Gospels and it makes the biggest claim of all about Jesus' appearances to 500 people" is True (because the I Corinthians 15:3-8 is an early creed that predates any of the written Gospels, and it makes the biggest claim about Jesus' resurrection appearances to 500 people).
This creed is considered an early Christian statement of faith, and it outlines the essential beliefs of the Christian faith. The fact that this creed predates the Gospels is significant because it means that the belief in Jesus' resurrection and appearances was already established within the Christian community. It also suggests that the resurrection appearances were not a later addition to the Gospel accounts.
Additionally, the fact that the creed mentions Jesus' appearances to 500 people indicates that the resurrection was not a private event but a public one, witnessed by many people. This lends credibility to the belief in the resurrection and the authenticity of the early Christian faith.
For more question on resurrection
https://brainly.com/question/30789827
#SPJ11
3. PART A: What does the word "upbraided" mean as it is used in paragraph 4? (this arose from nothing but his too great forbearance,9 which gave his soldiers more license than is consistent with military discipline. For this he was upbraided in the Senate by Fabius Maximus, and called the corrupter of the Roman soldiery.)
A. made fun of or ridiculed
B. reprimanded or criticized
C. excused or let off
D. honored and admired
4. PART B: Which phrase from paragraph 4 best supports the answer to Part A?
A. "his army rebelled"
B. "too great forbearance"
C. "more license than is consistent"
D. "called the corrupter"
Answer:
PART A: The word "upbraided" means as it is used in paragraph 4:
B. reprimanded or criticized
PART B: The phrase from paragraph 4 that best supports the answer to Part A:
D. "called the corrupter"
ASAP PLEASE HELP
Question 4 (Worth 10 points)
(02.03 HC)
Read the excerpts from Dr. King's "Letter from Birmingham Jail" and answer the question.
[4] I was arrested Friday on a charge of parading without a permit. Now there is nothing wrong with an ordinance which requires a permit for a parade, but when the ordinance is used to preserve segregation and to deny citizens the First Amendment privilege of peaceful assembly and peaceful protest, then it becomes unjust.
[5] I submit that an individual who breaks a law that conscience tells him is unjust, and willingly accepts the penalty by staying in jail to arouse the conscience of the community over its injustice, is in reality expressing the very highest respect for law.
[6] We can never forget that everything Hitler did in Germany was "legal" and everything the Hungarian freedom fighters did in Hungary was "illegal." It was "illegal" to aid and comfort a Jew in Hitler's Germany. But I am sure that, if I had lived in Germany during that time, I would have aided and comforted my Jewish brothers even though it was illegal. If I lived in a communist country today where certain principles dear to the Christian faith are suppressed, I believe I would openly advocate disobeying these anti-religious laws.
In 3–5 complete sentences, thoroughly explain Dr. King's central idea in this section and what specific details develop it. Provide at least two specific examples from the text to support your analysis of the central idea and how it's developed.
In this passage of "Letter from Birmingham Imprison," Dr. King contends that breaking an unreasonable law isn't as it were legitimate but essential for bringing consideration to the treachery and stimulating the heart of the community.
What is Letter from Birmingham Jail?Dr. King gives illustrations of laws that were legitimate but out of line, such as those in Nazi Germany that abused Jews and in communist nations that smothered devout flexibilities.
Dr. Dr. King attests that the most elevated aspect for law comes from challenging unreasonable laws and tolerating the results of breaking them.
Learn more about Letter from Birmingham Jail from
https://brainly.com/question/25843788
#SPJ1
the three cities that we considered for our vacation were london, england, paris, france, and tokyo, japan.
Identify the grammatical error
The grammatical error in the sentence is the inconsistent use of commas to separate the city names.
The comma after "France" is unnecessary, as it separates "Paris" and "France" as if they are separate entities. One possible correction would be to remove the comma after "France," so the sentence reads: "The three cities that we considered for our vacation were London, England, Paris, France and Tokyo, Japan."
Another option would be to add commas after each city name, for consistency: "The three cities that we considered for our vacation were London, England, Paris, France, and Tokyo, Japan."
Learn more about grammatical error
https://brainly.com/question/30154996
#SPJ4
Complete Question:
What is the grammatical error in the sentence "The three cities that we considered for our vacation were London, England, Paris, France, and Tokyo, Japan"?
The Institute for Policy Studies (IPS) published research showing that the three wealthiest Americans have more money than half of the American population.
The IPS stated that the poor are poor because the rich are rich. The IPS implied that the way to make the poor less poor is to make the rich less rich through government policies. They advocate higher taxes on the wealthy. The taxes would then be invested by government bureaucrats, who have always failed at creating meaningful wealth.
The text "The three wealthiest Americans have more money than half of the American population" is an example of:____.
The sentence "The taxes would then be invested by government bureaucrats, who have always failed at creating meaningful wealth" is an example of:_____.
While the text is an example of a statistic that can be proven true or false, the sentence is an example of a debatable opinion.
The three richest Americans have more wealth than half of all Americans, according to data from the Institute for Policy Studies (IPS). According to the IPS, the wealthy are wealthy because the poor are poor. According to the IPS, reducing the wealth of the wealthy through government measures is a means to help the poor become less impoverished.
They support raising the wealthy's tax rate. Following that, government bureaucrats, who have a history of failing to generate substantial wealth, would invest the taxes. The sentence The three wealthiest Americans have more money than half of the American population" is an illustration of a statistic that may be demonstrated to be accurate or untrue. An example of a contested opinion is the statement, The taxes would then be invested by government bureaucrats, who have always failed to create meaningful wealth. It will be a debatable opinion
Read more about debatable claim on:
https://brainly.com/question/21661776
#SPJ4
Answer:
1st part a second part a
Explanation:
edge trust
hich of the following sentences is syntactically ambiguous? group of answer choices close doors and open windows please turn off your cell phones the speed limit on this road is 100 kilometers per hour the conference will be held next week i need to deposit some money at the
Sentence 1 ("Close doors and open windows") is syntactically ambiguous. This is because it can have two different interpretations:
A. Close the doors, and then open the windows
B. Close the doors that are open, and open the windows that are closed
Syntactic ambiguity, in contrast to lexical ambiguity, which is the existence of two or more possible meanings inside a single word, is the existence of two or more possible meanings within a single phrase or group of words.
In this sentence, the ambiguity arises from the lack of clarity regarding the intended meaning of "close" and "open." The other sentences do not exhibit this type of ambiguity, making sentence 1 the syntactically ambiguous choice.
Learn more about Syntactic ambiguity here:
https://brainly.com/question/30728568
#SPJ11
What happened to Billie in July of 1992?
In July of 1992, she had a vivid dream of Billy calling for help.
However, it is worth noting that dreams are a natural and common occurrence during the sleep cycle, and they can be influenced by a variety of factors such as emotional state, physical health, and external stimuli. Dreams can also be symbolic, reflecting our subconscious thoughts and desires.
If the dream of Billy calling for help caused distress or anxiety, it may be worth exploring its potential meaning with a therapist or counselor. They can help provide insight and guidance on how to interpret the dream and address any underlying emotions it may have brought up.
It's important to keep in mind that dreams are not necessarily prophetic, and there may be no real-life significance to the dream. However, if there is a concern for someone named Billy, it may be worth checking in on their well-being.
To learn more about sleep cycle
https://brainly.com/question/17972677
#SPJ4
Read the sentences and pay attention to the underlined words. Match the sentences (1-4) to the sentences which follow on (A-D). How have the underlined words helped you decide?
1) □ Big industry is continuing to create pollution and greenhouse gases.
2) □ We have hired a tour guide to show us round the castle.
3) □ The views from the top of the tower are spectacular.
4) □ The animals have to build up a store of food before the weather turns cold.
A He will tell us about the history of the building.
B Otherwise, they may not have enough to eat during winter.
C You can see for miles around on a clear day.
D This means that climate change is still a threat to the planet.
Match the sentences (1-4) to the sentences which follow on (A-D) is: 1D 2A 3C 4B.
1) Big industry is continuing to create pollution and greenhouse gases. This means that climate change is still a threat to the planet.
2) We have hired a tour guide to show us round the castle. He will tell us about the history of the building.
3) The views from the top of the tower are spectacular. You can see for miles around on a clear day.
4) The animals have to build up a store of food before the weather turns cold. Otherwise, they may not have enough to eat during winter.
To learn more about pollution link is here
brainly.com/question/28519286
#SPJ1
the blank return is equal to the blank return and a(n) blank part of the return. multiple choice question. actual; expected; unexpected unexpected; actual; expected expected; actual; unexpected actual; actual; expected
The answer to the multiple-choice question is "unexpected return; actual; expected."
The term "unexpected" refers to the portion of the return that was not anticipated or forecasted, while "actual" represents the realized return that an investment earned over a given period. "Expected" refers to the estimated or predicted return, which is based on various factors, including historical performance, economic conditions, and other relevant data.
In other words, the actual return on investment is equal to the sum of the expected return and the unexpected return. The expected return is the return that is anticipated based on past performance, market trends, and other factors, while the unexpected return is the portion that was not expected or accounted for in the initial estimate.
To learn more about unexpected return, visit here
https://brainly.com/question/29762778
#SPJ4
Read the excerpt from act 1, scene 2 of The Tragedy of Macbeth.
Duncan. Dismay’d not this
Our captains, Macbeth and Banquo?
Sergeant. Yes;
As sparrows eagles, or the hare the lion.
If I say sooth, I must report they were
As cannons overcharg’d with double cracks;
So they
Doubly redoubled strokes upon the foe:
Except they meant to bathe in reeking wounds,
Or memorize another Golgotha,
I cannot tell—
But I am faint, my gashes cry for help.
What is the intended effect of the sergeant’s appeal to emotion?
to highlight Macbeth’s and Banquo’s valor
to gain the king’s admiration
to raise the king’s spirits
to emphasize his sense of duty to the crown
The intended effect of the sergeant’s appeal to emotion is option A: to highlight Macbeth’s and Banquo’s valor
What is the appeal to emotion about?The sergeant is one that shows that Macbeth's and Banquo's bravery in fight, comparing them to sparrows and rabbits confronting falcons and lions. He at that point goes on to say that they battled with such savagery and drive that they appeared like cannons cheated with twofold breaks.
Therefore, The sergeant's portrayal of Macbeth's and Banquo's strength in fight is implied to awe Ruler Duncan and emphasize their value as military pioneers.
Learn more about appeal to emotion from
https://brainly.com/question/4692301
#SPJ1
True or false: stocking perishables means that you’re supposed system must be capable of replenishing inventory quickly 
Answer:
The answer is true.
I need an essay about should robots have faces and can yall find me one
Answer:
A humanoid robot is similar to a human body in shape. These robots are professional service robots built for interaction with human tools and customer service. These humanoid robots are also used for inspection and maintenance; they have skin and eyes, But they are not made of flesh or bones. What Are Humanoid Robots? Humanoid robots are robots that resemble and act like humans. Typically engineered to imitate authentic human expressions, interactions and movements, these robots are often outfitted with an array of cameras, sensors and, more recently, AI and machine learning technologies, The ability to explore one's surroundings visually may arguably be the most useful and familiar form of sensing to us. Cameras allow robots to do exactly what we do with our eyes and can take on many different form factors all which can enable robots to perceive the world around them in different ways.
What did Reverend Parris see in the woods?
Reverend Parris saw a group of girls, including his niece Abigail, dancing and participating in rituals in the woods.
He suspected that they were engaging in witchcraft and was worried about the potential repercussions for his reputation and position in the community. This event was the catalyst for the Salem Witch Trials, as the girls began accusing others in the community of witchcraft. The incident also revealed the tensions and power struggles within the community, particularly between the conservative religious leaders and those who were more liberal and open-minded.
Ultimately, Parris' fear and paranoia contributed to the hysteria that led to the wrongful accusations and executions of many innocent people. It serves as a cautionary tale about the dangers of intolerance and the importance of critical thinking in times of crisis.
For more question on rituals
https://brainly.com/question/29776154
#SPJ11
What surprising thing about Chris does Westerberg remember about him?
In Jon Krakauer's book "Into the Wild," Westerberg remembers a surprising thing about Chris McCandless, the protagonist of the book.
According to Westerberg, Chris was a natural leader and had an incredible ability to connect with people from all walks of life. He could strike up a conversation with anyone and was genuinely interested in learning about their lives and experiences.
Westerberg also recalls that Chris had an uncanny ability to remember details about people he met, even if he only spoke to them briefly. This surprised Westerberg, who was impressed by Chris's ability to recall specific details about their conversations and the personal stories that people shared with him.
This talent for building connections with people and remembering the details of their lives highlights Chris's compassionate and empathetic nature. It also reflects his desire to form meaningful relationships with the people he encountered on his journey. Ultimately, this ability to connect with others would become one of Chris's greatest strengths as he embarked on his solitary quest to find his true self in the wilderness.
For more question on empathetic
https://brainly.com/question/17051136
#SPJ11
Which of the following are ways to enhance credibility through good speech delivery?
- Speaking fluently
- Speaking with conviction
- Speaking expressively
- Speaking very slowly
Good speech delivery is a crucial aspect of enhancing credibility during public speaking. Speaking fluently, without stuttering or hesitating, can help maintain the audience's attention and convey confidence.
Speaking with conviction and passion can make the speaker more convincing and credible. Expressive speaking, using voice modulation, gestures, and facial expressions, can add depth and interest to the speech.
However, speaking very slowly can lead to boredom and disinterest in the audience. Therefore, it is important to find a balance between speaking at a moderate pace and using appropriate emphasis and inflection to make the speech engaging and memorable.
Learn more about enhancing credibility
https://brainly.com/question/29458965
#SPJ4
How did Helen break the bathroom window in I Know What You Did Last Summer
When did Jon Krakauer interview Walt McCandless?
Jon Krakauer interviewed Walt McCandless in May 1993.
Walt McCandless, the father of Christopher McCandless (the subject of the book "Into the Wild"), was the subject of an interview by Jon Krakauer in May 1993. An important source of information for the book, which examines the life and death of Walt's son Christopher, was Krakauer's interview with Walt, which took place a number of years after Christopher's death in 1992. Originally tasked with writing about McCandless for Outside magazine, Krakauer decided to make the narrative into a book after becoming so engrossed in it. In order to write the book, Krakauer followed McCandless's path from the East Coast to Alaska throughout the country and spoke with dozens of people who knew him, including friends, family, and people he encountered while traveling.
To know more about the Jon Krakauer interviewed Walt McCandless in May 1993 visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30146889
#SPJ4
