Direct citation is when you list the author, year, and precise page number for each quotation you make from a source (inverted commas or within an indented paragraph).
What is the direct citation?Direct citations are those that have the author's last name in the sentence's body text and the date in parentheses. Indirect citations include the date and the family name in parentheses.
When you use another person's words in your own writing, it is known as a direct quotation. These must always be cited properly and enclosed in quotation marks (MLA, APA, Chicago, etc).
The author's last name, as well as the year of publication, are used in APA in-text citations, as in: (Field, 2005). Include the page number when using direct quotations, as in the following example: (Field, 2005, p. 14).
Learn more about citations, from:
brainly.com/question/14646235
#SPJ1
Country q has noticed a rapid increase in their unemployment rate and a sharp decline in their gdp. What should policy makers focus on to help balance these economic indicators?.
The policy makers focus on to help balance these economic indicators is for increasing the money supply so that consumers have more money to purchase goods.
The proportion of the labor force that is unemployed is known as the unemployment rate. It is a lagging indicator, which means that instead of rising or falling in advance of shifting economic conditions, it typically does so in response to them. The unemployment rate is likely to increase when there are few jobs available and the economy is struggling. It is predicted to decline when the economy is expanding healthily and there are plenty of employment available.
With a few exceptions, the first Friday of each month sees the publishing of the unemployment rate for the previous month.
The Bureau of Labor Statistics' (BLS) website offers access to both the report's most recent and previous iterations.
Learn more about Unemployment rate, here
https://brainly.com/question/15230373
#SPJ4
What does feel obligated to mean?.
Being obligated to feel means feeling grateful. wealthy or we owe someone something because we appreciate what they've done for you
What is Obligated?A proposal becomes a promise if the other party (the person to whom the proposal was made) accepts the proposal. Here, the person who made the proposal is called "Promise", and the person making the proposal is called "Promise".A firm agreement to take action, refrain from action, or make payment or delivery. In law, when parties exchange promises, each promise is a "reward" (an object of value) for the promise of the other. A statement to do or not to do a certain thing. A legally binding statement that entitles an entitled person to expect or demand that certain actions be taken or not takenthus, to be/feel in debted to sb She felt indebted to him for all the help he had given her in her career.
learn more about obligate here
https://brainly.com/question/29315624
#SPJ4
bill of rights should the government have power to make laws? to enforce laws? to punish lawbreakers?
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
Because the government has and will use there power for good so if they want to in force something they will try to to
When did the u. S. Supreme court first use judicial review to overthrow federally-enacted law?.
The U. S. Supreme court first use judicial review to overthrow federally-enacted law in 1803.
The very first Supreme Court case in which the Court asserted its jurisdiction to declare a legislation unconstitutional was Marbury v. Madison, which was decided in 1803. Chief Justice John Marshall concluded his opinion in this case by stating that the Supreme Court's obligation to strike down unconstitutional legislation was an essential outgrowth of their oath of office, which required them to uphold the Constitution in accordance with Article Six of the Constitution.
As of 2014, the US Supreme Court had declared 176 US Congress Acts to be unconstitutional. The Supreme Court has ruled 483 legislation to be wholly or partially unconstitutional between 1960 and 2019.
To know more about Marbury v. Madison:
brainly.com/question/11982017
#SPJ4
A legislative measure that deals with only one chamber of the legislature is called a.
A legislative measure that deals with only one chamber of the legislature is called a Simple resolution
A simple resolution in the US is a piece of legislation that is only approved by the Senate or the House. Simple resolutions are not forwarded to the President and do not become laws because they have only been enacted by one parliament.
The resolution is used for things like setting the guidelines by which each body shall function. Resolutions of this kind are used to act or speak on behalf of a single congressional chamber in U.S.
To know more about resolutions refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/13168863
#SPJ4
Which is the most accurate description of the executive office of the president?groups of advisers who help the chief of staffgroups of advisers who help the presidentgroups of advisers who oversee national securitygroups of advisers who oversee the economy.
The most accurate description of the office of the president is: Groups of advisers who help the president.
There is no president that is an expert in every field. In order to help his decision-making, a president usually relies on the expertise of other members of the office.
A president is a leader of an organization, corporation, network, club, alternate union, university or other institution.[1][2] the connection among a president and a major govt officer varies, relying at the shape of the precise agency. In a similar vein to a main running officer, the title of company president as a separate function (instead of being blended with a "C-suite" designation, consisting of "president and chief executive officer" or "president and chief working officer") is likewise loosely defined; the president is usually the legally recognized maximum rank of corporate officer, rating above the various vice presidents (inclusive of senior vice president and executive vp), but on its personal normally taken into consideration subordinate, in exercise, to the CEO.
Learn more about president here
https://brainly.com/question/2409724
#SPJ4
Develop an argument that takes a position on whether the federal government should be primarily responsible for managing environmental policy or if it should be the responsibility of the states.
The federal government should besaddled with the responsibility of managing environmental policy rather than the state.
EPA is an acronym for Environmental
Protection Agency and it is an agency of the federal government which was established by US Congress to oversee the regulation of pollution, environmental clean up, pesticide use, hazardous waste spills, contamination,and environmental compliance by industries and individuals.In the United States of America, EPA is saddled with the responsibility of overseeing all aspects of pollution. Also,it research solutions, develop policies, and enforces regulations through the resource Conservation and Recovery Act.
In conclusion, the federal government should be primarily responsible for managing environmental policy because unlike the state government, it can
generate more revenue to fund its anti-pollution agency and create uniform laws and regulations across the country.
To know more about Environment visit:https://brainly.com/question/27148905
#SPJ4
Erica is putting together a Venn diagram comparing public security agencies and private security companies. Which of the following could Erica place in
the center of the diagram as a similarity?
A.
B.
C.
D.
They focus on the welfare and protection of the general public
They provide protection and enhance safety
They take a Hippocratic oath and pledge
They offer services that are funded through taxes
Erica should place their respective roles regarding the protection and enhancing safety in the middle of the diagram as a similarity. Therefore, Option (B) is the appropriate response.
What is a Venn diagram?John Venn popularized the Venn diagram in the 1880s, which is a type of diagram that displays the logical relationship between sets.
The illustrations are used in probability, logic, statistics, linguistics, and computer science to demonstrate basic set relationships and to teach rudimentary set theory.
Hence, option (B) is the accurate answer to this question.
Learn more about the Venn diagram, from:
brainly.com/question/14344003
#SPJ1
what is the most important factor in deciding whether to prosecute? a. the prosecutor's belief in the defendant's guilt b. the reliability of victims c. whether sufficient evidence exists to gain a conviction d. whether or not the victim is willing to cooperate
The most important factor in deciding whether to prosecute is if there is sufficient evidence for conviction.
In a criminal trial, the prosecution is the party legally tasked with making its case against the defendant who is alleged to have broken the law. The prosecutor typically defends the state or the federal government in the case brought against the defendant.
Through its National Survey of Prosecutors, BJS has sponsored periodic national surveys or censuses of prosecutor offices since 1990. This program compiles information on the assets, guidelines, and procedures of state court systems' prosecution divisions.
Learn more about prosecute here:
https://brainly.com/question/27415132
#SPJ4
What was one of the main effects of the Federal Election Campaign Act?.
The Federal Election Campaign Act, passed by Congress in 1971, codified earlier reform initiatives and established stricter disclosure rules for federal candidates, political parties, and political action organizations (PACs).
What were a few of the Federal Election Campaign Act's provisions?The Federal Election Commission was founded by the statute (FEC). Four fundamental changes were made: (1) public funding of the presidential primary and general elections; (2) spending restrictions; (3) disclosure requirements; and (4) an effort to cap the size of contributions.
What was restricted by the Federal Election Campaign Act?In relation to any campaign for nomination for election or election to a federal office, a campaign may not accept more than $100 in cash from a single source.
To know more about Federal Election visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/14326073
#SPJ4
What are five 5 possible additional penalties for DUI conviction that a judge will order?.
The five possible additional penalties for DUI conviction that a judge will order jail time, community service, fines, license suspension, and having to install an ignition interlock device (IID) in your vehicle.
What are the penalties for DUI in Washington state?A first time DUI in WA State is typically charged as a gross misdemeanor, which carries a maximum penalty of 364 days in jail and a$ 5000 forfeiture. In all cases where a conviction is entered, there are obligatory minimal rulings, which a judge is needed to put and can not reduce.
A first offense DUI can be penalized by over to six months in county jail. This infrequently, if ever, happens. Rather, the court will doom the lawbreaker to informal( unsupervised) exploration in lieu of a jail judgment . On utmost first lawbreaker DUI persuasions, the exploration term is three times. Prosecutors in Washington will include any out- of- state DUI history in determining which bracket your case falls into.
Learn more about the DUI here: https://brainly.com/question/988799
#SPJ4
appellate jurisdiction
the authority of a given court to review cases that have already been tried in lower courts and are appealed to it by the losing party; such a court is called an appeals court or appellate court
Appellate jurisdiction is the authority of a given court to review cases that have already been tried in lower courts and are appealed to it by the losing party; such a court is called an appeals court or appellate court
A court's ability to hear and rule on appeals from decisions made by lower courts is known as appellate jurisdiction. In the federal judicial system of the United States, decisions made by the circuit courts can only be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, whereas cases initially determined in the district courts can be appealed only to the circuit courts of appeals.
The American judicial system's appellate courts, also referred to as the court of appeals, are in charge of hearing and examining appeals from cases that have already been heard at the trial-level or in another lower court.
To know more about appellate jurisdiction click here
brainly.com/question/8849005
#SPJ4
How did andrew jackson respond to the supreme court's decision in worcester v. Georgia.
Answer:
Andrew Jackson declined to enforce the Supreme Court's decision, thus allowing states to enact further legislation damaging to the tribes. The U.S. government began forcing the Cherokee off their land in 1838.
Explanation:
What gives U. S. Citizens the right to vote?.
Twenty-Sixth Amendment Section 1: The right of citizens of the United States, who are eighteen years of age or older, to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States.
The right to vote isn't covered in great detail in the original Constitution. Indeed, the right to vote in elections is not stated directly anywhere in the Constitution. Instead, it merely provides that anybody who is eligible to vote for a state's main house of the legislature is likewise qualified to vote for representatives from that state in the House of Representatives. As a result, states were given the authority to choose who was eligible to vote, which resulted in significant difference during the early years of the country.
To know more about right to vote, refer:
https://brainly.com/question/6826755
#SPJ4
Which phrase describes a tactic that a lobbyist would use to influence public policy.
A tactic that a lobbyist would use to influence public policy is Trying to shape public opinion through internet posts.
Lobbyists are individuals who work to influence public policy in a way that benefits their clients' interests.Since they are in the best position to do so, government officials frequently use these services to gather information, both political and technical, from people and organizations outside the government.Speaking with representatives face-to-face, giving testimony at legislative hearings, helping with the drafting of legislation, alerting state legislators to how a bill would affect their districts, coordinating grassroots campaigns, donating funds, and endorsing candidates are the most typical forms of lobbying.By explaining difficult concepts and problems to the general public in plain language, lobbyists support staff.Members of Congress can also offer friendly legislation to lobbyists in exchange for their support.Learn more about Lobbyists, here
https://brainly.com/question/509906
#SPJ4
Artist marvin gaye wrote a song entitled gotta give it up. This song is an example of _____________ property.
Which justices voted for the majority in Miranda v Arizona?
Chief Justice Earl Warren was the one that voted for the majority in Miranda v Arizona
What was the Miranda v Arizona case?
Miranda was given a 20–30 year prison term on each count after being convicted guilty of kidnapping. The Arizona Supreme Court ruled that Miranda's constitutional rights were not violated in getting the confession in response to an appeal.
Arizona (1966) (1966) The Supreme Court held in Miranda v. Arizona (1966) that imprisoned criminal suspects must be notified of their constitutional rights to an attorney and against self-incrimination prior to police questioning.
Read more on the Miranda V Arizona case https://brainly.com/question/1307890
#SPJ1
According to ________, evidence illegally seized by the police cannot be used in a trial.
According to the exclusionary rule, evidence illegally seized by the police cannot be used in a trial.
Unreasonable searches and seizures include those that are conducted 1) without a valid search warrant issued by a judge or magistrate that specifies the location, the subject, and the items to be seized, 2) without reasonable suspicion that the subject, the targeted location, or the subject's vehicle contains criminal evidence, or 3) that go beyond the parameters of the search and seizure warrant. Due to the Fourth Amendment's intent to safeguard citizens' reasonable expectation of privacy from government officials, an unreasonable search and seizure is unconstitutional.
To know more about Exclusionary rule:
brainly.com/question/12239906
#SPJ4
What aspects of the 1st amendment could be argued in the software industry favor.
Guarantee of free speech and limits on prior restraint can be used as arguments in favour of Software industry from 1st Amendment.
About 1st Amendment
1st Amendment (Amendment I) of the US Constitution forbids the government from enacting laws that restrict the freedom of religious expression, regulate the establishment of religion, or restrict speech, the press, assembly rights, or even the rights to petition government for redressing of complaints. It became one of the 10 amendments that make up the Bill of Rights on December 15, 1791.
To appease Anti-Federalist resistance to the Constitution's ratification, a Bill of Rights has been proposed. Many of the First Amendment's clauses were initially read more strictly than they are now since it initially only applied to laws passed by Congress.
To know more about free speech:
brainly.com/question/9263714
#SPJ4
A is walking to his car in a parking garage. It is late at night and the garage is nearly empty. B approaches A. B is walking quickly toward A and yelling for A to stop. B reaches into his jacket and A sees what he believes to be a firearm. A draws his own firearm and shoots and kills B. It is later discovered that B possessed a fake handgun inside his jacket. Can A assert self-defense on these facts? What facts would support or not support such a claim?
Yes, A can assert self-defense. Among the five principles of self-defense, the factor that weighs heavily, in this case, is proportionality.
What is the principle of proportionality?The principle of proportionality indicates that to be eligible for a self-defense claim, the individual bringing the claim must have responded in a manner that is judged proportionate to the threat faced. In this case, the assailant retrieved what seemed to be a fire-arm.
Although it was later found to be a fake one, under such circumstances, it is impossible to rationalize such matters. In order words, it is not reasonable to expect A to have carried out an investigation on B's fire arm before asserting self-defense.
The principle of proportionality further states that a threat of non-lethal violence should not be countered with lethal self-defense. For example, it would be unacceptable to shoot or stab a potential assailant who obviously meant just to slap or shove the person claiming self-defense.
This would not be considered a proportionate reaction. Shoving or slapping the aggressor away, on the other hand, would be considered proportionate, and a claim of self-defense might perhaps be utilized to escape an assault conviction.
As earlier indicated, a cannot be held liable on the basis of reasonable expectation.
Learn more about the principles of self-defense:
https://brainly.com/question/14114226
#SPJ1
Do you think that power is properly divided and shared among national, state, and local governments, or has congress taken on more power than the founders intended? support your answer with facts.
Federalism limits authorities through developing sovereign powers—the national authorities and state governments—thereby restraining the an effect on of each.
Separation of powers imposes internal limits by using dividing government against itself, giving unique branches separate capabilities, and forcing them to proportion power.
The division of energy between the countrywide and state governments is federalism. States have authority inside their barriers at the same time as the countrywide authority extends across all the states.
The separation of Powers in the united states of America is related to the checks and Balances machine. The tests and Balances device provides each department of government with character powers to test the opposite branches and save you any personal branch from turning too powerful.
Learn more about Government here: https://brainly.com/question/18464634
#SPJ4
If you want to work at a delivery company driving a vehicle in texas, how old do you need to be to obtain a cdl?.
If you want to work at a delivery company driving a vehicle in texas, you need to be 18 or up to obtain a commercial driving licence.
A CDL is really a professional licence that permits the bearer to operate large buses and commercial vehicles on Texas's and the nation's public roads. With this licence, you can show that you've undergone the necessary training and testing to handle large commercial motor vehicles safely. If you're enrolled full-time or almost so, Texas CDL training normally lasts around four and eight weeks. The process will take longer if you are pursuing part-time CDL training while concurrently operating for a trucking company (for example, as a dockworker).
To know more about Texas:
brainly.com/question/2836625
#SPJ4
In what way did george washington and franklin d. Roosevelt differ in their approaches to presidential term limits? how were those beliefs reflected in their presidencies? with which of these two men would president reagan have agreed?.
When contrasting and comparing, it would be taken into account that George Washington did not support raising the presidential term limit.
However, Franklin D. Roosevelt took a different approach to things and backed the idea of raising the presidential term limit.Forgiving such an example after George Washington's presidency, when he voluntarily decided against running for a third term. Franklin D. Roosevelt, however, even then sought and was granted a fourth term as president.Because of this, it's possible that President Reagan, who served only a second term, was more in agreement with Franklin D. Roosevelt than George H. W. Bush, who would succeed him.Take George Washington for example; he opposed raising the presidential term limit. However, Franklin D. Roosevelt took a different tack and backed the notion of raising the presidential term limit.George Washington, for instance, consciously chose not to run for a third term during his administration. Franklin D. Roosevelt, however, even sought and was granted a fourth term as president.Reagan, who served only one additional term and appointed George H. W. Bush to succeed him, may have agreed more with Roosevelt.Learn more about Franklin D. Roosevelt, here
https://brainly.com/question/25902541
#SPJ4
A _________ is a legal agreement between two or more people and is the least common form of business.
A partnership is a legal agreement between two or more people and is the least common form of business.
A formal agreement between two or more parties to run a business and split the profits is called a partnership.
Partnership arrangements come in many different forms. One type of business where partners may have minimal liability is a partnership where all participants share profits and liabilities equally. Additionally, there is the so-called "silent partner," when one party does not participate in the day-to-day management of the company.
An agreement between two or more people to manage a business' operations and divide its assets and liabilities is known as a partnership.
All partners in a general partnership corporation split the company's assets and debts equally.
Lawyers and other professionals frequently create limited liability partnerships.
Comparing a partnership to a corporation, there may be tax advantages.
To learn more about partnership- https://brainly.com/question/17083513
how did the collapse of communism help encourage the process of democratization
The collapse of communism helped encourage the process of democratization because, during the regime of communism, there were a lot of injustices.
Communism's atrocities were not restricted to mass slaughter. Even those who were lucky enough to escape faced tremendous repression, including abuses of freedom, expression, and religion, loss of property rights, and criminalization of everyday economic activities.
What is Communism?Communism is a far-left ideological, philosophical, and economic ideology and is ongoing within the socialist movement with the goal of establishing a communist society, a sociocultural order centered on shared ownership of the means of production, dispersion, and exchange that distributes products to everyone in the society.
Communist societies likewise lack personal land, social classes, money, and the state. Communists frequently advocate voluntary self-government, but they disagree on how to achieve it.
Learn more about Democratization:
https://brainly.com/question/1092276
#SPJ1
the purpose of the is to determine if there is enough evidence to establish probable cause that a crime was committed.
Usually, a complaint is accompanied by an affidavit that has been signed by a law enforcement official. The Affidavit describes the crime that was committed and the accused's involvement in it.
To put it another way, the Affidavit is used to prove there is reason to believe the accused committed the crime enforcement. When there is grounds to believe that a crime may have been committed (for an arrest) or when there is evidence of a crime in the area to be searched, courts typically find probable cause (for a search). Probable cause may also support a warrantless search or seizure in emergency situations. Executive and judicial determinations of probable cause are the two different types. One conclusion reached during the preliminary investigation is the executive decision of probable cause. Police must be able to provide objective evidence or circumstances that supported their suspicions that a suspect committed a crime in order to establish probable cause. A police officer cannot, for instance, examine a car or make an arrest based only on a gut reaction. They must back up their arguments with facts enforcement.
Learn more about enforcement here :
https://brainly.com/question/10846074
#SPJ4
What does F 3d mean in law?.
F3D means the Federal journalist, third series. A civil system of government exists when power is participated between a central, civil body, and lower realities similar as countries.
What's F3D mean?
Federal journalist, third series, which is the journalist containing this opinion. -" 193" is the runner in the journalist where this opinion begins. -" 2d Cir." is the designation for the Second Circuit Court of prayers.
Legal bowdlerizations are generally set up in anything from a book to court documents. Having a common set of bowdlerizations is veritably important because it allows everyone reading a legal document to understand what's being presented in jotting without having to spell out terms that are constantlyutilized.There are three corridor of case citation – Volume, reported designation and runner number. It gives information like the date of the case, what was the opinions of that case, and other information related to the case.
Learn more about the Federal here: https://brainly.com/question/695831
#SPJ4
Which instance of political expression would be considered symbolic speech brainly.
'A demonstrator chanting anticorporate slogans outside a company's headquarters' instance of political expression would be considered symbolic speech.
Showing slogan is the symbol through which expressions are getting the speech delivered. In elections many political parties use symbols and chant slogans to express their opinions and people demand, they are going to fulfil.
Symbolic speech includes wordless, nonwritten ways of communicating such as burning flags, wearing armbands, as well as destroying draught cards.
The question is incomplete, here attaching the question:
Which instance of political expression would be considered symbolic speech?
A. A candidate for Congress giving an interview to the media.
B. A local citizen speaking up at a town hall meeting
C. A demonstrator chanting anticorporate slogans outside a
company's headquarters
D. A student wearing all black to call attention to a political issue
To learn about Symbolic speech
https://brainly.com/question/2836056
#SPJ4
which rule of evidence would an attorney break if he or she were to ask a witness what rumors were being spread about the defendant?
A fact witness's opinions and predictions are admissible in court rule of evidence would an attorney break if he or she were to ask a witness what rumors were being spread about the defendant.
Evidence is defined as something that offers evidence or leads to a conclusion. The suspect's blood at the scene of a criminal offense is an example of proof. The footprints within the house are an example of evidence that someone got here internal.
while you go to court, you may provide records (called “evidence”) to a judge who will decide your case. This proof may also include facts you or someone else tells to the choose (“testimony”) as well as gadgets like email and text messages, documents, snap shots, and objects (“exhibits”).
Learn more about evidence here:https://brainly.com/question/1256677
#SPJ4
jamie buys a new home. under local city law, jamie is prohibited from building a second home on her parcel of land. this prohibition by the city is referred to be the textbook as
The type of bailment frequently influences the level of care required of the bailee. A bailment made solely for the bailee's benefit generally entails a high duty of care.
An ordinary duty of care is established by a bailment for mutual benefit. A small duty of care is created when a bailment is made for the sole benefit of the bailor.
Workers who are unemployed due to no fault of their own and who meet other state UI law eligibility requirements are eligible to receive unemployment benefits through the UI program, which is a partnership between the federal government and the states. The individual UI program is run by each state in accordance with federal regulations.
Learn more about bailment here:
https://brainly.com/question/28187904
#SPJ4
