The following line from Of Plymouth Plantation best shows the author's view that Native peoples wanted to make peace with European colonists:
"Being, after some time of entertainment and gifts, dismissed, a while after he came again, and 5 more with him, and they brought again all the tools that were stolen away before, and made way for the coming of their great Sachem, called Massasoyt; who, about 4 or 5 days after, came with the chief of his friends and other attendance, with the aforesaid Squanto."
This line indicates that the Native peoples came back with tools that were previously stolen and made way for their great Sachem to visit the European colonists with his friends. They also brought Squanto, who was a Native American who could speak English, which demonstrates their willingness to engage in peaceful relations with the colonists.
The line "But about the 16th of March a certain Indian came boldly amongst them, and spoke to them in broken English, which they could well understand, but marveled at it" best reflects the author's view that Native peoples wanted to make peace with European colonists in "Of Plymouth Plantation."
Option B is correct.
The line from "Of Plymouth Plantation" that best shows the author's view that Native peoples wanted to make peace with European colonists is:"But about the 16th of March a certain Indian came boldly amongst them, and spoke to them in broken English, which they could well understand, but marveled at it."This line demonstrates the Native individual's willingness to approach the European colonists and communicate with them in English, even if it was broken English. The fact that the Indian "came boldly amongst them" suggests a level of trust and openness, despite the initial language barrier.The author, William Bradford, goes on to describe how this initial encounter led to positive interactions and collaboration with the Native people, including the return of stolen tools and the eventual arrival of Massasoit, the Native Sachem. These events further illustrate the Native people's desire for peaceful relations and cooperation with the colonists.Overall, this passage conveys the author's view that some Native individuals were willing to reach out and establish peaceful interactions with the European settlers, which was an essential aspect of the early relationship between the two groups.Hence Option B is correct.For more questions on colonists -
https://brainly.com/question/457399
#SPJ2
Why was Mark chasing Charlie?
A. Charlie told Karen that Mark liked her.
B. Charlie took Mark's bike without asking.
C. Charlie accused Mark of lying about the toad.
D. Charlie told a lie about Mark's father.
According to the given options, Charlie could have done something to Mark which led him to chase Charlie. Therefore, option B. Charlie taking Mark's bike without asking is the correct option since taking someone's property without permission can be seen as an offense. It is possible that Mark may have chased Charlie to retrieve his bike or to make him pay for taking it without his consent.
Hence, the correct option is B
This map shows the epicenter of the 2010 earthquake in Haiti.
Map of Haiti with concentric rings. From closest to farthest from the center of the rings, several cities are labeled: Jacmel, Saint-Marc, Hinche, Les Cayes, and Gona茂ves.
Which of these cities is closest to the epicenter of the earthquake?
Hinche
Saint-Marc
Les Cayes
Gonaïves
What political and social considerations made it difficult for the supreme court to "incorporate" the bill of rights into state laws? Be specific
The incorporation of the Bill of Rights into state law was not an easy process due to political and social considerations. The Supreme Court was faced with many challenges in its attempt to incorporate the Bill of Rights into state law.
Among the challenges was the issue of state sovereignty, which had been a contentious issue since the adoption of the Constitution. The first ten amendments to the Constitution are known as the Bill of Rights. These amendments were intended to protect the rights of individuals from infringement by the federal government. The question of whether these rights should be extended to state governments became a controversial issue in the early years of the republic.
This was because the Bill of Rights was originally meant to limit the power of the federal government, not the states. The Supreme Court was faced with the question of whether the Bill of Rights applied to the states, and if so, how it should be incorporated. The Court had to determine whether the Bill of Rights applied to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
The Due Process Clause prohibits states from depriving individuals of life, liberty, or property without due process of law. The Court had to determine whether the Due Process Clause incorporated the Bill of Rights into state law. The Court first addressed the issue of incorporation in the case of Barron v. Baltimore in 1833. The Court held that the Bill of Rights did not apply to the states. This decision was based on the idea that the Bill of Rights was intended to limit the power of the federal government, not the states.
The Court also held that the Fourteenth Amendment did not incorporate the Bill of Rights into state law. Incorporation of the Bill of Rights into state law was not achieved until the mid-twentieth century. The Court gradually incorporated the Bill of Rights into state law through a series of cases. The Court first incorporated the First Amendment's freedom of speech clause in the case of Gitlow v. New York in 1925. The Court gradually extended the incorporation of the Bill of Rights to cover most of the protections in the Bill of Rights.
The Supreme Court faced many challenges in its attempt to incorporate the Bill of Rights into state law. The main challenge was the issue of state sovereignty. The Bill of Rights was originally meant to limit the power of the federal government, not the states. The Court had to determine whether the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment incorporated the Bill of Rights into state law. The Court gradually incorporated the Bill of Rights into state law through a series of cases.
For more questions on Bill of Rights
https://brainly.com/question/30859931
#SPJ8
Question 15 of 20
1969: National Environmental Policy Act
1970: Establishment of Environmental Protection Agency
1973: Endangered Species Act
How did President Nixon believe these programs would change society?
OA. By regulating business practices that could harm the environment
OB. By diverting public attention away from the Watergate scandal
OC. By allowing the free market to dictate environmental policies
OD. By expanding the role of government in people's everyday lives
President Nixon believed that these programs would change society by expanding the role of government in people's everyday lives. The Option C.
How did President Nixon believe these programs would change society?President Nixon's approach to environmental policies was driven by the belief that government intervention and regulation were necessary to protect the environment and ensure sustainable practices.
The National Environmental Policy Act (1969), the establishment of the Environmental Protection Agency (1970), and the Endangered Species Act (1973) were all part of his broader vision to address environmental concerns and promote responsible stewardship.
Read more about President Nixon
brainly.com/question/16135947
#SPJ1
Which article in the Constitution outlines the federal judicial branch?
Article I
Article II
Article III
Article IV
Question 7(Multiple Choice Worth 5 points)
(02.05 MC)
Which step in a jury trial would follow the deliberations of the jury in a criminal case?
The judge's charge when there is a hung jury
The verdict as determined by jury decision
Closing arguments delivered by the defense
Additional evidence presented by the prosecution
Question 8(Multiple Choice Worth 5 points)
(02.05 MC)
What is the difference between a civil case and a criminal case?
Criminal cases deal with someone who is accused of breaking the law, while civil cases deal with disputes between people or groups.
Criminal cases have a jury to decide the verdict, while civil cases are all decided by a judge and do not have jurors to determine a verdict.
An appeal to a civil case would go straight to the Supreme Court, while with a criminal case it would go to the U.S. Court of Appeals.
Civil cases deal with someone who has been arrested for violating policy, while criminal cases deal with private conflicts between individuals.
Question 9(Multiple Choice Worth 5 points)
(02.05 MC)
A citizen of Mexico residing in Utah accuses a local university of violating civil rights. Which court would hear the case?
State court in Utah
U.S. District Court in Utah
U.S. Court of Appeals
The Supreme Court
Question 10(Multiple Choice Worth 5 points)
(02.05 LC)
What are the three basic levels of courts?
Local, state, and federal
Trial, civil, and criminal
City, county, and state
Trial, appellate, and supreme
The article in the Constitution that outlines the federal judicial branch is Article III.
Question 7: The verdict as determined by jury decision.
Question 8: Criminal cases deal with someone who is accused of breaking the law, while civil cases deal with disputes between people or groups.
Question 9: U.S. District Court in Utah.
Question 10: Trial, appellate, and supreme.
What informs Article III of the constitution?Article III of the Constitution outlines the structure and powers of the federal judiciary in the United States. It is primarily informed by the framers' intent to establish an independent judiciary that serves as a separate and coequal branch of government.
The language and provisions of Article III draw inspiration from various sources, including English common law, state constitutions, and the experiences and debates of the Constitutional Convention. The framers aimed to create a system of federal courts capable of interpreting and applying the law, resolving disputes, and ensuring the protection of individual rights.
learn more about Article III of the constitution: https://brainly.com/question/1194247
#SPJ1
What did the Supreme Court say in its Plessy v. Ferguson decision?
Answer: On May 18, 1896, the U.S. Supreme Court case Plessy v. Ferguson ruled that separate-but-equal facilities were constitutional. The Plessy v. Ferguson decision upheld the principle of racial segregation over the next half-century.
Explanation:
In its Plessy v. Ferguson decision, the Supreme Court said that segregation or separation of races did not violate the United States Constitution, so long as the separate facilities provided were equal.
The case involved a man named Homer Plessy, who was arrested for violating a Louisiana law requiring separate railway cars for black and white people. Plessy argued that the law violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, which guaranteed equal treatment under the law regardless of race.
However, the Supreme Court, in a 7-1 decision, ruled against Plessy. Justice Henry Billings Brown wrote the majority opinion, which argued that segregation was not inherently unequal as long as the facilities were equal in quality. The Court also held that the Fourteenth Amendment only prohibited intentional discrimination, not segregation in and of itself.
The Plessy v. Ferguson decision would have significant consequences for American society, as it allowed for legal segregation and discrimination against African Americans to continue for decades. The ruling would be overturned in 1954 by the landmark case Brown v. Board of Education, which held that segregation in public schools was unconstitutional, regardless of whether the facilities were equal or not.
Know more about Supreme Court here:
https://brainly.com/question/1046966
#SPJ8
14. What is one factor that led to the collapse of communism in the Soviet Union? a. Soviet citizens had too many civil liberties. b. The decisions of the Communist Party led to a struggling economy. c. People became disillusioned with the classless society that had developed. d. An epidemic weakened the health care system.
Answer: I believe it’s B
Explanation:
which group mostly immigrated to new york city a puerto ricans b mexicans c chinese d native americans
Option A. Puerto Ricans have always been a sizable immigrant population in New York City. During the 20th century, Puerto Ricans moved more and more to New York City, especially after World War II. Puerto Ricans are still one of the city's main ethnic groupings today.
Immigration Puerto Ricans to New YorkPuerto Ricans have migrated to New York City for a very long time. Following World War II, the largest migration surge took place, propelled by economic possibilities and the granting of U.S. citizenship to Puerto Ricans. Puerto Ricans established themselves in the South Bronx and East Harlem, creating close knit communities that upheld their language and culture.
They have significantly enriched the diversity of the city's social, cultural, and political life. Being a U.S. territory, Puerto Rico grants its residents the right to citizenship at birth. Puerto Rican immigration has significantly influenced New York City's cultural landscape overall.
Learn more on immigrants here https://brainly.com/question/17141328
#SPJ1
Which statement about the U.S. judicial system is true?
The Judiciary Act of 1789 established and organized the system of lower federal courts.
Article III of the Constitution identified three types of courts at the state and federal levels.
The Rooker-Feldman Doctrine requires that all cases must first be heard in a state trial court.
The Erie Doctrine prevents state courts from hearing any case involving a federal law or policy.
Question 2(Multiple Choice Worth 5 points)
(02.05 MC)
A person from Virginia receives a speeding ticket in the State of North Carolina. The driver challenges the legality of the ticket. Which court would have jurisdiction?
State court in Virginia
State court in North Carolina
U.S. District Court in Virginia
U.S. District Court in North Carolina
Question 3(Multiple Choice Worth 5 points)
(02.05 LC)
What does original jurisdiction mean?
Right to hear a case the first time it is presented in court
Ruling or outcome of any criminal or civil court case
Petitioning of cases to the highest federal court
Selection of judges for the federal judicial branch
Question 4(Multiple Choice Worth 5 points)
(02.05 MC)
The U.S. Supreme Court rejects a petition to hear a case. What will happen next?
The decision of the lower court will stand.
The case is sent to the U.S. Court of Appeals.
The decision of the lower court is reversed.
The case will be sent to Congress for review.
Question 5(Multiple Choice Worth 5 points)
(02.05 MC)
Which statement is true about the U.S. Court of Appeals?
It has original jurisdiction over federal-question and diversity cases.
A jury listens to evidence and determines the official court ruling.
It can review certain cases from the state-level supreme courts.
A panel of judges hears select cases from a federal trial court.
The statement that is true about the U.S. judicial system is "The Judiciary Act of 1789 established and organized the system of lower federal courts." (Option A).
The court that would have jurisdiction in the case of a person from Virginia receiving a speeding ticket in the State of North Carolina would be "State court in North Carolina." (Option B).
"Original jurisdiction" means the "Right to hear a case the first time it is presented in court." (Option A)
When the U.S. Supreme Court rejects a petition to hear a case, the outcome is that "The decision of the lower court will stand." (Option A).
Question 5: The true statement about the U.S. Court of Appeals is that "A panel of judges hears select cases from a federal trial court." (Option D).
What is a Judicial System?A legal system refers to bureaucracy of courts and legal organizations that are responsible for defining and applying the society in a country or jurisdiction. It is a important component of the overall legal structure and is tasked accompanying resolving disputes, executing justice, and maintaining the rule of law.
The legal systemtypically resides of various levels of courts, varying from trial courts or lower courts to appellate courts and, in some cases, a highest federal court. Each level of the court has its own area of authority and authority to handle particular types of cases.
Learn more about judicial system here: https://brainly.com/question/12694841
#SPJ1
Answer: a b a a d
Explanation:
list three kinds of power that every govermnet has
this man led the volunteer “red shirts” against conservative forces
Giuseppe Garibaldi led the "Red Shirts" in their fight against conservative forces during the Italian Risorgimento.
The man who led the volunteer "Red Shirts" against conservative forces was Giuseppe Garibaldi. Garibaldi was an Italian revolutionary and nationalist who played a crucial role in the unification of Italy in the 19th century. He organized and commanded the volunteer army known as the "Red Shirts" (or "Garibaldini") during the Italian Risorgimento, a movement for Italian unification.The "Red Shirts" were a paramilitary force of volunteers who fought against various conservative forces that opposed Italian unification. They were known for their distinctive red shirts and played a significant role in several military campaigns. Garibaldi's leadership and military strategies were instrumental in achieving victories and expanding the influence of the Italian nationalist movement.Garibaldi's efforts with the "Red Shirts" helped to secure key regions of Italy and contributed to the eventual formation of a unified Italian state. His dedication to the cause of Italian unification and his ability to rally and lead volunteers in battle made him a prominent figure in the history of Italy and a symbol of the Risorgimento movement.In summary, Giuseppe Garibaldi led the volunteer "Red Shirts" in their fight against conservative forces, and his leadership was crucial in the process of Italian unification.For more questions on Italian
https://brainly.com/question/22155070
#SPJ8
which precedent was established by the supreme court's ruling in gibbons v ogden
The precedent that was established by the supreme court's ruling in gibbons v ogden was regulation of commerce by federal government's power.
What was commerce?The system of activities, roles, processes, and institutions that contribute either directly or indirectly to the transfer of commodities and services on a broad scale is known as commerce.
The exchange of products and services between two or more entities is referred to as commerce. Typically, it entails purchasing and selling valuable items. The three parties involved in commerce can be either consumers, businesses, or both.
Learn more about commerce at;
https://brainly.com/question/31449022
#SPJ1
Which of the following is a method used by states to select state judges?
Election by votes in Congress
Election by the Supreme Court
Appointment by the president
Appointment by the governor
Question 2(Multiple Choice Worth 5 points)
(02.06 LC)
Which Supreme Court case established its power and legitimacy and expanded its role?
Brown v. Board of Education
Korematsu v. United States
Marbury v. Madison
California v. Bakke
Question 3(Multiple Choice Worth 5 points)
(02.06 MC)
A court requires payment of damages from one party to another. Which term describes this outcome?
Judicial review
Remedy
Commission
Fair verdict
Question 4(Multiple Choice Worth 5 points)
(02.06 MC)
Why do some Americans prefer the appointment of judges rather than elections?
They believe appointments cost less public money than if potential judges run campaigns.
They believe appointments allow judges to focus on the will of the people in judicial review.
They believe appointments free judges from the pressures of public support and re-election.
They believe appointments lead judges to be dependent on the other government branches.
Question 5(Multiple Choice Worth 5 points)
(02.06 MC)
What was the decision in the landmark Supreme Court decision in California v. Bakke?
Other students were chosen over Allan Bakke for admission.
Denial of Allan Bakke's admission was upheld by the Court.
The equal protection clause did not apply to Bakke's case.
The equal protection clause supported Bakke's case.
1. Appointment by the governor is a method used by states to select state judges.
The governor has the authority to appoint judges, ensuring a level of political influence in the judiciary. Therefore, the correct answer is Appointment by the governor.2. Marbury v. Madison is the Supreme Court case that established its power and legitimacy by asserting the principle of judicial review.
This landmark decision expanded the Court's role in interpreting the Constitution and determining the constitutionality of laws.Therefore, the correct answer is Marbury v. Madison.3. When a court requires payment of damages from one party to another, it is referred to as a remedy.
This outcome aims to provide compensation or relief to the aggrieved party for the harm or loss they have suffered. Therefore, the correct answer is Remedy.4. Some Americans prefer the appointment of judges over elections because they believe it frees judges from the pressures of public support and re-election.
They argue that appointed judges can focus on upholding the law and making impartial decisions rather than being influenced by popular opinion. Therefore, the correct answer is ''They believe appointments free judges from the pressures of public support and re-election''.5. In the landmark Supreme Court decision in California v. Bakke, the Court ruled that the equal protection clause supported Bakke's case.
The decision found that the use of racial quotas in university admissions was unconstitutional, emphasizing the principle of equal protection under the law. Therefore, the correct answer is ''The equal protection clause supported Bakke's case.''Find more questions on governor
https://brainly.com/question/16209628
#SPJ8
What did the explorers the north west passage to provide
Answer: they shortened the distance and time that merchant ships needed to travel from Europe and Asia.
the role played by Lilian ngoyi during the liberation struggle in South Africa
Answer: Lilian Ngoyi was a South African anti-apartheid activist. She was the first woman elected to the executive committee of the African National Congress and helped launch the Federation of South African Women.
what advantages did the us have that made it ripe for rapid industrialization? Check all that apply
Abundant resources, agricultural productivity, technological innovations, capital access, immigration, and infrastructure development were advantages for rapid industrialization in the US.
The United States had several advantages that made it ripe for rapid industrialization. Some of these advantages include:1. Abundant Natural Resources: The U.S. possessed vast reserves of natural resources such as coal, iron ore, oil, and timber, providing the necessary raw materials for industrial production.2. Expansive Land and Agricultural Productivity: The availability of fertile land and favorable agricultural conditions allowed for a surplus of food production. This surplus supported a growing population and freed up labor for industrial work.3. Technological Innovations: The U.S. fostered a culture of innovation, leading to advancements in technology and machinery. Innovations like the telegraph, steam engine, and assembly line revolutionized industrial processes and increased productivity.4. Access to Capital and Investment: The U.S. had a strong financial system, access to capital, and a favorable business climate that encouraged entrepreneurship and investment in industrial ventures.5. Immigration and a Diverse Workforce: The U.S. experienced significant immigration, which brought in a diverse workforce. Immigrants contributed to the labor force, bringing new skills and ideas to fuel industrial growth.6. Infrastructure Development: The U.S. invested in building an extensive transportation network, including railroads, canals, and later, highways, facilitating the movement of goods and people across the country.In conclusion, the advantages that made the United States ripe for rapid industrialization include abundant natural resources, expansive land and agricultural productivity, technological innovations, access to capital and investment, immigration, and infrastructure development.For more questions on industrialization
https://brainly.com/question/1078028
#SPJ8
Complete question:
What advantages did the US have that made it ripe for rapid industrialization? Check all that apply.
- massive forests
- access to two oceans
- rich mineral resources
- fertile land
- railroads
Which Enlightenment idea is reflected in the Declaration of Independence?
A. Colonial leaders should have been able to appoint their governors directly.
B. Raising taxes unfairly violated colonists" rights to property.
C. The king violated the social contract by imposing different governments on the American colonies and Canada.
O D. Colonialism as an institution violated American Indians' natural
rights.
The Enlightenment idea reflected in the Declaration of Independence is that the king violated the social contract by imposing different governments on the American colonies and Canada. Therefore, option C is correct.
The Enlightenment idea reflected in the Declaration of Independence is option C: The king violated the social contract by imposing different governments on the American colonies and Canada.
The Declaration of Independence, adopted by the Continental Congress on July 4, 1776, was a document that announced the American colonies' separation from Great Britain and asserted their independence. It was heavily influenced by Enlightenment thinkers such as John Locke, whose ideas emphasized the rights of individuals and the importance of government by consent.
The concept of the social contract was a key Enlightenment idea that influenced the Declaration of Independence. According to the social contract theory, individuals agree to give up certain rights in order to receive protection and other benefits from the government. In return, the government is expected to protect the rights and interests of its citizens.
The Declaration of Independence argues that the king of Great Britain violated this social contract by imposing different governments on the American colonies and Canada without their consent. The document asserts that the colonists had the right to choose their own government and that the king's actions were unjust and tyrannical. This idea reflects the Enlightenment belief that governments derive their power from the consent of the governed, and that when a government fails to protect the rights and interests of its citizens, it is the right of the people to overthrow it.
For more such questions on Declaration of Independence, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/21348300
#SPJ8
Steven is a politically active planter from North Carolina. He is opposed to a powerful central government and the financial plan of Alexander Hamilton. Steven is most likely _____.
Steven is most likely an Anti-Federalist, opposing a powerful central government and Alexander Hamilton's financial plan.
Based on the information provided, Steven, as a politically active planter from North Carolina who opposes a powerful central government and the financial plan of Alexander Hamilton, is most likely an Anti-Federalist.The Anti-Federalists were a group of individuals who opposed the ratification of the U.S. Constitution and advocated for strong state governments with limited federal power. They believed that a powerful central government would undermine individual liberties and the rights of the states. Steven's opposition to a powerful central government aligns with the core principles of Anti-Federalism.Furthermore, Steven's opposition to Alexander Hamilton's financial plan suggests a stance against a strong federal government's intervention in economic affairs. Hamilton's financial plan aimed to consolidate and strengthen federal authority over fiscal matters, including the assumption of state debts and the establishment of a national bank. Steven's disagreement with Hamilton's financial plan further aligns with the Anti-Federalist position of limited federal control.In conclusion, based on his opposition to a powerful central government and Alexander Hamilton's financial plan, Steven is most likely an Anti-Federalist.For more questions on government
https://brainly.com/question/1078669
#SPJ8
Which clause protects the rights of citizens who move or travel between states?
Elastic clause
Commerce clause
Full faith and credit clause
Privileges and immunities clause
Question 7(Multiple Choice Worth 5 points)
(02.08 MC)
How does the concept of federalism apply to the seabed issue between Florida and the United States?
Florida believes it is entitled to ownership of all underwater land in the Gulf of Mexico
Florida wants to use the Gulf of Mexico to trade with countries other than the United States.
Florida believes it is entitled to underwater land up to three marine leagues from the coast.
Florida wants to control the Gulf of Mexico without the interference of the federal government.
Question 8(Multiple Choice Worth 5 points)
(02.08 MC)
Which of the following would represent a referendum?
Wyoming citizens sign a petition to have a state law removed.
Virginia citizens remove a government official from office.
Louisiana citizens introduce ideas for a new law to the state.
California citizens vote on whether to change education law.
Question 9(Multiple Choice Worth 5 points)
(02.08 LC)
What issue have Florida and Georgia been in conflict over for decades?
Land rights
Water rights
Travel rights
Trading rights
Question 10(Multiple Choice Worth 5 points)
(02.08 LC)
Which of the following would be an example of a responsibility of local governments?
Driver's licenses
Vaccinations for children
Waste management
Health insurance
The answers to the multiple choice questions are below
The Privileges and Immunities Clause protects the rights of citizens who move or travel between states.Florida believes it is entitled to underwater land up to three marine leagues from the coast in the seabed issue with the United States.A referendum is represented by California citizens voting on whether to change education law.Florida and Georgia have been in conflict over water rights for decades.Waste management is an example of a responsibility of local governments.The clause that protects movement rights6. The clause that protects the rights of citizens who move or travel between states is the Privileges and Immunities Clause.
7. Florida believes it is entitled to underwater land up to three marine leagues from the coast. This pertains to the issue of ownership of underwater land in the Gulf of Mexico.
8: California citizens vote on whether to change education law. This represents a referendum, as citizens are directly voting on a proposed change in law.
9: Florida and Georgia have been in conflict over water rights for decades, specifically regarding water allocation from shared river basins.
10 Waste management is typically a responsibility of local governments, as they are responsible for handling and disposing of waste within their jurisdictions.
Read mroe on voting here https://brainly.com/question/1330417
#SPJ1
in which year did the number of jewish refugees nearly double from the previous year?
The number of Jewish refugees nearly doubling from the previous year occurred predominantly during and after World War II, specifically in the years 1945 and 1946.
The Jewish refugees during the world war 2Due to the Holocaust and Nazi persecution, millions of Jews were forced to flee their homes during World War II. Although it is difficult to pinpoint an exact figure, millions are thought to have sought safety. Many people escaped Nazi occupied areas and looked for refuge in other nations. However, because to limiting immigration laws and resistance from many countries, a sizable portion were unable to find refuge and sadly perished.
Jewish refugees increased significantly in 1938 as a result of the bloody Kristallnacht events. In the years that followed the liberation of the concentration camps, between 1945 and 1948, the majority of Jewish refugees arrived. Relocation efforts were made, and the founding of Israel in 1948 gave many Jewish exiles and displaced people a place to call home.
Learn more on World war 2 here https://brainly.com/question/651584
#SPJ1
Answer:
1938
Explanation:
Took the test on Edge
Which of the following statements was true about radio in the 1920's? A. News on the radio was immediate and instantaneous. B. Many radio stations failed to advertise during their programming. C. Radio replaced the telephone in homes. D. Radio stations only played music.
The true statement about radio in the 1920s is:
A. News on the radio was immediate and instantaneous.
The truth about radioDuring the 1920s, radio broadcasting played a significant role in disseminating news and information to the public. Radio stations would broadcast news bulletins, updates, and live reports, allowing people to receive news in a more immediate and timely manner compared to other forms of media at that time.
This instant delivery of news was one of the key factors that contributed to the growing popularity of radio during the 1920s.
Read more on radio here https://brainly.com/question/69373
#SPJ1
The Declaration of Independence explains that the king of Great Britain violated the principle of _______________ by abusing his power over the colonists.
natural law
due process
limited government
equality of all persons
The king of Great Britain violated the principle of limited government by abusing his power over the colonists.
The Declaration of Independence asserts that the king of Great Britain violated the principle of "limited government" by abusing his power over the colonists. The Declaration, drafted primarily by Thomas Jefferson, outlines a list of grievances against King George III and highlights the colonists' justification for declaring independence.The principle of limited government emphasizes that the powers of a government should be restricted and defined by a constitution or a set of laws. It asserts that those in power should be accountable to the people and that their authority should be limited to prevent the abuse of power.In the Declaration of Independence, the colonists accuse King George III of disregarding the limits of his authority and violating the principles of limited government. They argue that he imposed unjust laws, interfered with colonial self-governance, and denied them their rights and liberties.By asserting that the king violated the principle of limited government, the Declaration of Independence underscores the colonists' belief in the necessity of self-governance and their aspiration for a government that respects the rights and freedoms of its citizens.For more questions on Great Britain
https://brainly.com/question/28734617
#SPJ8
C, limited government
Explanation: The king of Great Britain violated the principle of limited government by abusing his power over the colonists. The colonists believed that the king went beyond the limits of his authority and imposed unfair laws on them. This violated the idea that a government's powers should be restricted to prevent the abuse of power. The colonists wanted a government that respected their rights and freedoms.
Happy to help; have a great day! Please remember to give me Brainliest :)
How has Judaism evolved into a culture as well as a faith?
from its growth to more than thirteen million followers
through its spread throughout multiple countries
from its followers who were born into the faith
through its traditions which evolved from the faith
Judaism has developed into a culture as well as a faith through various ways which include its growth to more than thirteen million followers.
The religious tradition of Judaism has existed for more than three millennia and has experienced numerous changes over that time. These changes have enabled Judaism to evolve into a culture, as well as a faith, and these changes have been spurred on by its growth to more than thirteen million followers. Judaism, which is one of the world's oldest monotheistic religions, has spread throughout the world and has been embraced by people of different races, cultures, and nationalities.
The religion has grown to over thirteen million followers, and this has contributed significantly to its evolution into a culture, as well as a faith. The Jewish people have lived in various countries throughout the world, and this has enabled them to develop a distinct culture based on their religious traditions and customs. This culture has been shaped by the different countries in which the Jews have lived and has evolved into a unique blend of religious and cultural practices. Judaism is also a faith that is passed down from generation to generation.
The followers of Judaism who were born into the faith have contributed significantly to the religion's evolution into a culture. They have preserved their traditions and customs, which have been passed down from generation to generation. The traditions and customs of Judaism have evolved from the faith and have contributed significantly to its evolution into a culture.
These traditions include rituals such as Shabbat, the Passover Seder, and Hanukkah. Each of these rituals has a unique history and symbolism that has evolved over time and has contributed significantly to the development of Jewish culture.
For more questions on Judaism
https://brainly.com/question/21757539
#SPJ8
which statement best describes why immigrants were discriminated against during the 1920s
The discrimination of immigrants during the 1920s was caused by various reasons, including economic, political, social, cultural, and racial factors. Many Americans blamed immigrants for the country's issues and viewed them as a threat to their culture, identity, and way of life. The Great War and nationalism also contributed to the discrimination of immigrants. Additionally, racism and the fear of communism led to social exclusion, discrimination, and prejudice toward immigrants. The Immigration Act of 1924, which imposed a quota system, further reduced the number of immigrants allowed to enter the country, leading to more discrimination.
The Immigration Act of 1924 imposed a quota system that restricted the number of immigrants from each country allowed to enter the United States. The restriction was aimed primarily at southern and eastern Europeans, as well as Asians. This was a period when America was experiencing economic and political transformation, thus creating the need for scapegoats to shift blame for the country's issues. This made many Americans discriminate against immigrants. Here is a detailed explanation of why immigrants were discriminated against during the 1920s. Immigrants were discriminated against during the 1920s because of various reasons, including economic, political, social, and cultural factors.
Firstly, America was going through a phase of significant political, social, and economic changes during the 1920s. These changes included urbanization, industrialization, and the emergence of a consumer culture, which had a significant impact on American society. However, many Americans blamed these issues on the new immigrants who came to the country looking for better economic opportunities. Thus, Americans developed a negative attitude toward immigrants, which led to discrimination and prejudice toward them.
Secondly, the Great War (World War I) had ended, and Americans were beginning to embrace a new sense of nationalism. This nationalism made many Americans feel that their country was superior to others, and thus, they saw immigrants as a threat to their culture and identity. They feared that immigrants would change their way of life and American values. This led to discrimination against immigrants, which was characterized by violence, harassment, and social exclusion.
Thirdly, the fear of communism was also another reason why immigrants were discriminated against during the 1920s. Many Americans believed that communism was a foreign ideology that was brought to the country by immigrants, especially the Russians and Eastern Europeans. As a result, there were efforts to exclude and deport immigrants suspected of having communist beliefs.
Fourthly, racism was another significant factor that contributed to discrimination against immigrants during the 1920s. Many Americans believed in racial superiority and white supremacy. They saw immigrants as inferior to them, especially those from Southern and Eastern Europe. They believed that these immigrants were less intelligent and had a lower standard of living than the Americans.
This led to social exclusion, discrimination, and prejudice towards immigrants. Finally, the Immigration Act of 1924 imposed a quota system that restricted the number of immigrants allowed to enter the United States. The restriction was aimed primarily at southern and eastern Europeans, as well as Asians. This act led to a significant reduction in the number of immigrants allowed to enter the country, which led to discrimination toward immigrants
For more questions on The Immigration Act of 1924
https://brainly.com/question/27597810
#SPJ8
Using an encyclopedia, the Internet, or other resource, explain the significant role that each of the following leaders played in the sectionalism issue. Type a 300-word biography about each of the following leaders: Calhoun, Clay, Hayne, Jackson, and Webster. Your entire report should be 1,500 words in length.
You should construct your biography using the following arrangement of information: name, birthplace and date, early career, resident state, political offices held, view on states' rights, and solutions enacted.
The biography should be written using proper grammar, spelling, and punctuation. List your research sources in the bibliography.
The positions of Webster, the Federalist and steadfast New England supporter of the Union; Clay, the "war hawk" and National Rebublican leader from the West; and Calhoun, the young nationalist who became the leading spokesperson for the South and slavery were sectionalism.
What is sectionalism?Sectionalism is the excessive dedication to a region's interests over national interests.
There have been conflicts between various regions of the country throughout American history, but from the country's founding until the American Civil War, Northerners' and Southerners' divergent perspectives on the institution of slavery were the most significant sectional divide and the country's defining political issue.
Read more about Sectionalism
https://brainly.com/question/27891016
#SPJ1
Choosing a topic of the early church in Religious Education, provide a detailed lesson plan explaining how each component will enhance teaching and learning in the classroom. Use four pages.
The Topic is : The Role of Women in the Early Church. The part of Women within the early Christian church could be a noteworthy and captivating perspective of devout history.
What is the Early ChurchWithin the early a long time of Christianity, ladies played assorted and persuasive parts, which regularly challenged societal norms and desires of the time.
Amid the time of Jesus Christ, ladies were among His devotees and devotees. They played an dynamic part in supporting Jesus' service, both financially and through their nearness and benefit. Outstandingly, Mary Magdalene, Joanna, Susanna, and numerous other ladies are said within the Unused Confirmation as reliable adherents of Jesus.
Read more about Early Church here:
https://brainly.com/question/31679217
#SPJ1
What is the problem fir little red riding hood
The problem in Little Red Riding Hood is the encounter with a deceptive wolf on the way to her grandmother's house.
The problem in the story of Little Red Riding Hood is that the main character, Little Red Riding Hood herself, encounters a cunning wolf on her way to her grandmother's house. Unbeknownst to Little Red Riding Hood, the wolf has malicious intentions and plans to deceive her and harm her grandmother. The wolf successfully tricks Little Red Riding Hood by posing as her grandmother, leading to a dangerous situation. The problem revolves around the wolf's deception and the potential harm that awaits Little Red Riding Hood and her grandmother. This classic fairy tale highlights themes of trust, caution, and the dangers of naivety. It serves as a cautionary tale for children about the importance of being cautious and aware of potential dangers in the world.For more such questions on Little Red Riding Hood:
https://brainly.com/question/10944272
#SPJ8
An outcome of the slave codes in the southern colonies during the 1600s was that?
Answer:
Explanation:
----------------------------------------------------
2.6) Choose the correct answer.
In the
Eve was the first to eat of the fruit of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil
Answer:
Eve was tricked by the serpent into eating the forbidden fruit from the tree of knowledge
Explanation:
In an era of bad harvests, famine, and rioting, the French government took steps to improve the worsening financial crisis. What did the government do? The government raised taxes. The government called for genuine political reform. The government forced all estates to pay the same taxes. The government reduced the Third Estate’s tax burden.™®
The French government during this period raised taxes, called for genuine political reform, and attempted to equalize the tax burden across estates, but it did not reduce the tax burden specifically for the Third Estate.
During the era characterized by bad harvests, famine, and rioting in France, the government implemented several measures to address the worsening financial crisis.
Firstly, the government opted to raise taxes as a means of generating additional revenue. This decision aimed to alleviate the economic strain and stabilize public finances.
Furthermore, in response to growing calls for political reform, the government initiated efforts to bring about genuine political changes. These reforms sought to address the grievances and demands of the population, aiming to foster a fairer and more representative political system.
In an attempt to tackle the issue of economic inequality, the government introduced a policy mandating that all estates, regardless of their social standing, pay the same taxes.
This move aimed to create a more equitable tax system, reducing the burden on the lower classes and redistributing the tax responsibility more evenly across society.
It is worth noting that the reduction of the Third Estate's tax burden, representing the commoners and middle-class citizens, is not historically accurate.
In fact, the Third Estate bore the brunt of the tax burden, leading to widespread dissatisfaction and contributing to the social unrest that eventually culminated in the French Revolution.
For more such questions government,click on
https://brainly.com/question/1772602
#SPJ8
