The correct order of events in the conflict over the Ohio Territory is as follows:
1. American Indians were defeated at the Battle of Fallen Timbers.
2. The United States signed the Treaty of Greenville.
3. Tecumseh formed an American Indian confederation.
4. Tecumseh tried to rally support during the War of 1812.
5. Little Turtle defeated US troops in a border war.
6. American settlers began to arrive in the Ohio River Valley.
7. Andrew Jackson and his army faced off against the Creek.
8. The Creek were defeated in the Battle of Horseshoe Bend.
9. Runaway enslaved people came to live with the Seminole.
10. The Seminole fought and lost the First Seminole War.
This sequence of events outlines the major developments in the conflict over the Ohio Territory, including battles, treaties, the formation of alliances, and the impact of American settlement and expansion.
It is important to note that these events spanned a significant period of time and involved various Native American tribes and conflicts with both British and American forces.
For more questions on Ohio Territory
https://brainly.com/question/4722224
#SPJ8
What best describes why Southerners believed there was no need for immigrants to live in the South? Enslaved people fulfilled nearly all the labor needs. There were no port cities for them to arrive in. The South was already too crowded. People in the region only spoke English.
Answer: Americans in the region only spoke English, best describes why there was no need for immigrants to live in the South.
Explanation:
Slaves handled nearly all the labor needs So being an agricultural and rural area, the South didn't really have many opportunities for those who arrived there. Although there was a time in which immigrants did go to South, many wouldn't handle the abusive terms of their contracts. A lot of them died. Eventually, the South managed to do everything that they wanted by recurring to the use of slaves.
which precedent was established by the supreme court's ruling in gibbons v ogden
The precedent that was established by the supreme court's ruling in gibbons v ogden was regulation of commerce by federal government's power.
What was commerce?The system of activities, roles, processes, and institutions that contribute either directly or indirectly to the transfer of commodities and services on a broad scale is known as commerce.
The exchange of products and services between two or more entities is referred to as commerce. Typically, it entails purchasing and selling valuable items. The three parties involved in commerce can be either consumers, businesses, or both.
Learn more about commerce at;
https://brainly.com/question/31449022
#SPJ1
Question 3 of 5
According to this cartoon, which group of people was opposed to women's
suffrage?
OA. The middle class
OB. The working class
C. Women
D. Men
"The Ballot Box is
Mine Because it's
Mine!"
D. Men
---------------------
2.6) Choose the correct answer.
In the
Eve was the first to eat of the fruit of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil
Answer:
Eve was tricked by the serpent into eating the forbidden fruit from the tree of knowledge
Explanation:
Why was Mark chasing Charlie?
A. Charlie told Karen that Mark liked her.
B. Charlie took Mark's bike without asking.
C. Charlie accused Mark of lying about the toad.
D. Charlie told a lie about Mark's father.
According to the given options, Charlie could have done something to Mark which led him to chase Charlie. Therefore, option B. Charlie taking Mark's bike without asking is the correct option since taking someone's property without permission can be seen as an offense. It is possible that Mark may have chased Charlie to retrieve his bike or to make him pay for taking it without his consent.
Hence, the correct option is B
British colonial settlements instead of the option suggested in this excerpt?
REASONS OR MOTIVES for the raising of a PUBLIC STOCK
to be employed for the peopling and discovering of such
countries as may be found most convenient for the supply
of those defects which this Realm of England most
requires. . . .
Where colonies are founded for a public-[welfare], they
may continue in better obedience and become more
industrious than where private men are absolute backers
of a voyage. Men of better behavior and quality will engage
themselves in a public service, which carries more
reputation with it, than a private, which is for the most part
ignominious in the end, because it is presumed to aim at a
profit and is subject to rivalry, fraud, and envy, and when it
is at the greatest height of fortune can hardly be tolerated
because of the jealousy of the state.
Some of the key motives for British colonial settlements included:
1. Economic gains. Britain saw colonies as opportunities to acquire new markets for its goods, resources like timber and precious metals, and cheap raw materials for its industries. Colonial trade allowed Britain to grow its wealth and power.
2. Strategic benefits. Colonies could serve as military bases, coaling stations, and sites for naval dockyards. This expanded Britain's global influence and power projection capabilities.
3. Spread of Christianity and "civilization". Many British leaders viewed colonialism as a means to propagate Christianity and what they considered to be superior European culture and values.
4. National prestige. found and rule over far-flung colonial empires was considered a mark of a great nation and increased Britain's global prestige and influence.
5. Population overflow. Some colonies, especially in North America, served as places to send excess population from Britain, especially unemployed workers or prisoners.
So economic motives were a primary factor, along with strategic calculations and a desire to extend British national power and reputation on the world stage. The desire to spread Christianity and "civilize" indigenous peoples was also an important ideological motivation.
describe several areas targeted by the Progressives for societal reform and the results of their efforts.
The Progressives' efforts led to significant changes in American society. Their reforms resulted in improved working conditions, increased political accountability, expanded access to education, and the creation of social welfare programs.
The Progressives of the late 19th and early 20th centuries aimed to address a wide range of social, economic, and political issues.
They focused on several key areas for societal reform. One area targeted was labor conditions.
Progressives advocated for improved workplace safety, the establishment of minimum wage laws, and the regulation of working hours.
Their efforts led to the creation of labor unions and the passage of important legislation, such as the Fair Labor Standards Act.
Another area of concern was political corruption.
Progressives pushed for political reforms, including the direct election of senators, the introduction of primary elections, and the adoption of anti-corruption measures. These changes aimed to increase government transparency and accountability.
Education was also a major focus for Progressives. They promoted the idea of universal education and worked to improve school facilities, teacher training, and curriculum standards.
These efforts resulted in the expansion of public education and the establishment of kindergarten programs. Lastly, Progressives sought to address social inequality and poverty.
They supported the establishment of social welfare programs, such as the creation of public housing and the introduction of welfare benefits. These initiatives aimed to alleviate poverty and provide a safety net for vulnerable members of society.
Overall, the Progressives' efforts led to significant changes in American society. Their reforms resulted in improved working conditions, increased political accountability, expanded access to education, and the creation of social welfare programs.
For more questions on American society.
https://brainly.com/question/13323062
#SPJ8
If people approve of the new program, it could benefit me politically by helping my chances of reelection. One possible social cost is that parents might become upset if the price of lunch increases. Which of these did you discuss in your response? Check all that apply. how my program may affect my chances of reelection how the increased cost of my program may upset parents how the changes my program brings may upset students
The statement "If people approve of the new program, it could benefit me politically by helping my chances of reelection" reflects the potential political advantage that the politician anticipates by implementing the program.
It acknowledges the positive impact on the politician's chances of being reelected if the program is well-received by the public.The statement "One possible social cost is that parents might become upset if the price of lunch increases" highlights the potential negative consequence of the program on parents. It recognizes the concern that an increase in the price of lunch may result in dissatisfaction among parents, which is a social cost to be considered.While the program's impact on students is not specifically discussed in the response, it is important to note that the potential upset or concerns of students could also be an important consideration in evaluating the overall effects of the program.For more such questions on reelection
https://brainly.com/question/3512590
#SPJ8
Drawing Conclusions According to the prisoner in the second selection, what restrictions were imposed on advocates who defended suspected heretics? What would have been the implications of such restrictions?
According to the prisoner in the second selection, the restrictions imposed on advocates who defended suspected heretics included severe punishments, such as imprisonment, torture, and even death.
These advocates were subjected to intense scrutiny, suspicion, and hostility from the authorities and the general public.The implications of these restrictions were significant. Firstly, the fear of punishment and reprisal would deter many advocates from taking up the defense of suspected heretics. This would lead to a lack of legal representation and a denial of due process for the accused, undermining the principles of justice and fairness.The restrictions would create a chilling effect on freedom of speech and the expression of differing opinions. People would be hesitant to openly express their views or challenge the prevailing orthodoxy for fear of being labeled as heretics and facing severe consequences. This would stifle intellectual discourse, critical thinking, and the advancement of knowledge and ideas.The restrictions imposed on advocates would contribute to the consolidation of power by those in authority. By suppressing dissent and persecuting those who defended suspected heretics, the authorities could maintain control and enforce their preferred ideologies without opposition.The restrictions imposed on advocates defending suspected heretics had far-reaching implications, including the erosion of justice, the suppression of free speech, and the consolidation of power. These restrictions were detrimental to the principles of a just and open society, hindering intellectual progress and perpetuating a climate of fear and oppression.For more such questions on restrictions
https://brainly.com/question/15070309
#SPJ8
Which of the following statements was true about radio in the 1920's? A. News on the radio was immediate and instantaneous. B. Many radio stations failed to advertise during their programming. C. Radio replaced the telephone in homes. D. Radio stations only played music.
The true statement about radio in the 1920s is:
A. News on the radio was immediate and instantaneous.
The truth about radioDuring the 1920s, radio broadcasting played a significant role in disseminating news and information to the public. Radio stations would broadcast news bulletins, updates, and live reports, allowing people to receive news in a more immediate and timely manner compared to other forms of media at that time.
This instant delivery of news was one of the key factors that contributed to the growing popularity of radio during the 1920s.
Read more on radio here https://brainly.com/question/69373
#SPJ1
According to the Constitution, which is a reason that the president and other federal officials may be impeached?
For "treason or other crimes that affect the entire nation" under Article I of the Constitution
"only upon suspicion of treason or resignation without notice" under Article I of the Constitution
"only after removal from office for charges related to treason" under Article II of the Constitution
For "treason, bribery, or other high crimes or misdemeanors" under Article II of the Constitution
Question 2(Multiple Choice Worth 5 points)
(02.03 LC)
Which statement describes the president's role as chief executive?
Has the power to make treaties with foreign nations
Has the power to commission military officers
Has the power to grant reprieves and pardons
Has the power to veto legislative bills
Question 3(Multiple Choice Worth 5 points)
(02.03 MC)
Which list includes all major parts of the executive branch?
Executive Departments, Executive Office of the President, Independent Agencies, White House Staff
White House Office, Department of State, Independent Agencies, Oval Office of the President
Executive Office of the President, House of Representatives, Senate, Supreme Court
The President, the Vice President, the Cabinet, the Department of Defense
Question 4(Multiple Choice Worth 5 points)
(02.03 MC)
Which statement is true about presidential decision making?
It is a complex process, as the president must consider many different interests and potential outcomes.
It is a complex process, as the president has no power to act as an individual in the midst of a crisis.
It is a simple process, as the president has broad power to take action with or without others' approval.
It is a simple process, as the president must follow a strict and clear process of working with advisers.
Question 5(Multiple Choice Worth 5 points)
(02.03 LC)
What does Article II of the U.S. Constitution describe?
Oversight and impeachment powers of Congress
Structure and powers of the legislative branch
Creation and support of the president's Cabinet
Organization and duties of the executive branch
Answer:
Question 1: For "treason, bribery, or other high crimes or misdemeanors" under Article II of the Constitution.
Question 2: Has the power to commission military officers.
Question 3: Executive Departments, Executive Office of the President, Independent Agencies, White House Staff.
Question 4: It is a complex process, as the president must consider many different interests and potential outcomes.
Question 5: Organization and duties of the executive branch.
Explanation:
1. According to the Constitution, the reason that the president and other federal officials may be impeached is "For 'treason, bribery, or other high crimes or misdemeanors' under Article II of the Constitution." Option D is the correct choice
2. The statement that describes the president's role as chief executive is "Has the power to commission military officers." Option B is the correct choice
3. The list that includes all major parts of the executive branch is "Executive Departments, Executive Office of the President, Independent Agencies, White House Staff." Option A is the correct choice
4. The statement that is true about presidential decision-making is "It is a complex process, as the president must consider many different interests and potential outcomes." Option A is the correct choice
5. Article II of the U.S. Constitution describes "Organization and duties of the executive branch." Option D is the correct choice
1. According to the Constitution, the reason that the president and other federal officials may be impeached is "For 'treason, bribery, or other high crimes or misdemeanors' under Article II of the Constitution." Impeachment is a constitutional process by which elected officials, including the president, can be removed from office if they are found guilty of serious offenses. Option D is the correct choice
2. The statement that describes the president's role as chief executive is "Has the power to commission military officers." As the chief executive, the president is the commander-in-chief of the armed forces and has the authority to appoint and commission military officers. Option B is the correct choice
3. The list that includes all major parts of the executive branch is "Executive Departments, Executive Office of the President, Independent Agencies, White House Staff." These entities make up the key components of the executive branch of the U.S. government. Option A is the correct choice
4. The statement that is true about presidential decision-making is "It is a complex process, as the president must consider many different interests and potential outcomes." Presidential decision-making involves evaluating various factors, including national security, economic considerations, and legal implications, making it a complex and multifaceted process. Option A is the correct choice
5. Article II of the U.S. Constitution describes "Organization and duties of the executive branch." This article outlines the powers and responsibilities of the president, including their role as the chief executive, commander-in-chief, and head of state. It also covers the president's ability to appoint key officials, grant pardons, and execute the laws of the United States. Option D is the correct choice
These constitutional provisions establish the framework for the executive branch of the U.S. government and the role and powers of the president within that branch.
For more such questions on Constitution:
https://brainly.com/question/20336789
#SPJ2
What was William pen’s “holy experiment”
Option A is correct. William Penn's "holy experiment" refers to his vision and implementation of a religiously tolerant and democratic society in the American colony of Pennsylvania during the 17th century.
The holy experimentPenn, a Quaker, founded Pennsylvania as a haven for religious freedom and sought to establish a society based on principles of equality, peace, and justice.
His goal was to create a place where individuals of different faiths could coexist and practice their religions freely, without persecution or discrimination. This inclusive approach attracted settlers from various religious backgrounds, making Pennsylvania a diverse and tolerant colony during that time.
Read mroe on William Penn here https://brainly.com/question/14112144
#SPJ1
William pen’s “holy experiment” is option A. to build a colony where people of all faiths could co-exist amicably.
Why option A?The correct answer is A. William Penn's "Holy Experiment" referred to his vision of creating a colony where people of all faiths could live together in harmony. Penn, a Quaker, founded the colony of Pennsylvania in 1681 as a haven for Quakers who faced religious persecution in England.
However, he also wanted Pennsylvania to be a place where people of different religious backgrounds could enjoy religious freedom and coexist peacefully. Penn implemented policies that promoted religious tolerance and democratic principles in Pennsylvania, attracting settlers from various religious groups.
learn more about William Penn: https://brainly.com/question/13409722
#SPJ1
This map shows the epicenter of the 2010 earthquake in Haiti.
Map of Haiti with concentric rings. From closest to farthest from the center of the rings, several cities are labeled: Jacmel, Saint-Marc, Hinche, Les Cayes, and Gona茂ves.
Which of these cities is closest to the epicenter of the earthquake?
Hinche
Saint-Marc
Les Cayes
Gonaïves
What is a possible outcome from judicial review?
Supreme Court can be given too much power.
Congress can override a Supreme Court decision.
The president must enforce Supreme Court rulings.
Supreme Court can undo public policy created by Congress.
Question 7(Multiple Choice Worth 5 points)
(02.06 MC)
Which of the following gives the judicial branch the power to determine whether a law is acceptable under the Constitution?
Writ of mandamus
Judicial review
Precedent
Dissent
Question 8(Multiple Choice Worth 5 points)
(02.06 MC)
What is a limit on the Supreme Court when it evaluates a law or policy?
The Supreme Court cannot enforce the changes it made.
The Supreme Court needs the approval of the president.
The Supreme Court needs the approval of Congress.
The Supreme Court has no power to overrule laws.
Question 9(Multiple Choice Worth 5 points)
(02.06 MC)
According to the Federalist Papers, which of the following is true about judicial review?
Early leaders like James Madison said judicial review was not a necessary power of the Supreme Court because the states already were using this power.
Early leaders like Alexander Hamilton expected that the Supreme Court would have and would use the power of judicial review as a check on the other branches.
The framers of the Constitution never intended the federal court system to have the power of judicial review, as they believed it was a power reserved for the states.
The Constitution does not include the idea of judicial review because it was not a concept considered or understood by early leaders of the American government.
Question 10(Multiple Choice Worth 5 points)
(02.06 MC)
How can Congress check the power of the judicial branch?
The president can impeach a Supreme Court justice.
Congress can veto any decision made by the Supreme Court.
The president can approve Supreme Court justice nominations.
Congress can create and pass a new altered law on the same topic.
Answer: D) Supreme Court can undo public policy created by Congress.
Explanation: Judicial review is the power of the courts to examine the actions of the legislative, executive, and administrative branches of the government and to determine whether they are consistent with the constitution. If the courts find that an action violates the constitution, they can declare it unconstitutional and nullify it. This means that judicial review can undo public policy created by Congress or other branches of the government.
Judicial review is one of the checks and balances in the separation of powers, which is a system that prevents any branch of the government from becoming too powerful or abusing its authority. Judicial review allows the courts to supervise and limit the actions of Congress and other branches when they exceed their constitutional powers or infringe on the rights and liberties of the people.
Judicial review is not explicitly mentioned in the text of the U.S. Constitution, but it was established by the Supreme Court in the landmark case of Marbury v. Madison (1803). In this case, Chief Justice John Marshall declared that “it is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is.” He argued that the courts have the duty to interpret the constitution and to ensure that it is followed by all branches of the government.
Since then, judicial review has been used by the Supreme Court and other federal and state courts to review and invalidate various laws and actions that were deemed unconstitutional. Some examples of public policies that were undone by judicial review are:
The Alien and Sedition Acts (1798), which restricted free speech and press, were declared unconstitutional by several state courts.The Missouri Compromise (1820), which prohibited slavery in certain territories, was declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court in Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857).The National Industrial Recovery Act (1933), which regulated wages and prices, was declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court in Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States (1935).The Civil Rights Act (1875), which prohibited racial discrimination in public places, was declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court in Civil Rights Cases (1883).The Agricultural Adjustment Act (1933), which subsidized farmers to reduce production, was declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court in United States v. Butler (1936).The Gun-Free School Zones Act (1990), which banned firearms near schools, was declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court in United States v. Lopez (1995).The Defense of Marriage Act (1996), which defined marriage as between a man and a woman, was declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court in United States v. Windsor (2013).Therefore, a possible outcome from judicial review is that the Supreme Court can undo public policy created by Congress or other branches of the government if it violates the constitution.
Hope this helps, and have a great day! =)
The possible outcome from judicial review is that the Supreme Court can undo public policy created by Congress. Therefore, option (D) is the correct outcome.
Judicial review is the court's ability to assess whether the legislative, executive, and administrative branches of the government are acting in accordance with the Constitution.
The courts have the authority to declare something unlawful and toss it out if they determine it violates the Constitution.
This implies that judicial review has the power to overturn legislation passed by Congress or other government agencies.
One of the mechanisms for balance in the system of the separation of powers, which prevents any branch of the government from growing too strong or misusing its authority, is judicial review.
When Congress and other branches go beyond their constitutional authority or infringe on the liberties and rights of the populace, judicial review enables the courts to monitor and restrict those acts.
Hence, option (D) is the correct outcome of the Judicial Review.
To learn more about judicial review, refer below;
https://brainly.com/question/24078224
#SPJ4
What is one specific way that living in a company town prevented workers from forming organized labor unions?
Workers paid the company for all of their needs, such as food and housing.
Company agents were constantly monitoring residents.
Everyone in the town worked for the same company.
Companies made everyone who lived in company towns sign an anti-union contract.
Answer:
D) Companies made everyone who lived in company towns sign an anti-union contract.
Explanation:
One specific way that living in a company town prevented workers from forming organized labor unions was by requiring residents to sign anti-union contracts. These contracts would typically include clauses or provisions that explicitly prohibited workers from joining or forming labor unions, participating in strikes, or engaging in any collective bargaining activities. By making such contracts mandatory for residents, the companies effectively suppressed the workers' ability to organize and advocate for their rights as a collective group. Violation of these contracts often resulted in severe consequences, such as termination of employment or eviction from company-provided housing, which further discouraged workers from attempting to form unions.
Answer:
D
Explanation:
What political and social considerations made it difficult for the supreme court to "incorporate" the bill of rights into state laws? Be specific
The incorporation of the Bill of Rights into state law was not an easy process due to political and social considerations. The Supreme Court was faced with many challenges in its attempt to incorporate the Bill of Rights into state law.
Among the challenges was the issue of state sovereignty, which had been a contentious issue since the adoption of the Constitution. The first ten amendments to the Constitution are known as the Bill of Rights. These amendments were intended to protect the rights of individuals from infringement by the federal government. The question of whether these rights should be extended to state governments became a controversial issue in the early years of the republic.
This was because the Bill of Rights was originally meant to limit the power of the federal government, not the states. The Supreme Court was faced with the question of whether the Bill of Rights applied to the states, and if so, how it should be incorporated. The Court had to determine whether the Bill of Rights applied to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
The Due Process Clause prohibits states from depriving individuals of life, liberty, or property without due process of law. The Court had to determine whether the Due Process Clause incorporated the Bill of Rights into state law. The Court first addressed the issue of incorporation in the case of Barron v. Baltimore in 1833. The Court held that the Bill of Rights did not apply to the states. This decision was based on the idea that the Bill of Rights was intended to limit the power of the federal government, not the states.
The Court also held that the Fourteenth Amendment did not incorporate the Bill of Rights into state law. Incorporation of the Bill of Rights into state law was not achieved until the mid-twentieth century. The Court gradually incorporated the Bill of Rights into state law through a series of cases. The Court first incorporated the First Amendment's freedom of speech clause in the case of Gitlow v. New York in 1925. The Court gradually extended the incorporation of the Bill of Rights to cover most of the protections in the Bill of Rights.
The Supreme Court faced many challenges in its attempt to incorporate the Bill of Rights into state law. The main challenge was the issue of state sovereignty. The Bill of Rights was originally meant to limit the power of the federal government, not the states. The Court had to determine whether the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment incorporated the Bill of Rights into state law. The Court gradually incorporated the Bill of Rights into state law through a series of cases.
For more questions on Bill of Rights
https://brainly.com/question/30859931
#SPJ8
Which article in the Constitution outlines the federal judicial branch?
Article I
Article II
Article III
Article IV
Question 7(Multiple Choice Worth 5 points)
(02.05 MC)
Which step in a jury trial would follow the deliberations of the jury in a criminal case?
The judge's charge when there is a hung jury
The verdict as determined by jury decision
Closing arguments delivered by the defense
Additional evidence presented by the prosecution
Question 8(Multiple Choice Worth 5 points)
(02.05 MC)
What is the difference between a civil case and a criminal case?
Criminal cases deal with someone who is accused of breaking the law, while civil cases deal with disputes between people or groups.
Criminal cases have a jury to decide the verdict, while civil cases are all decided by a judge and do not have jurors to determine a verdict.
An appeal to a civil case would go straight to the Supreme Court, while with a criminal case it would go to the U.S. Court of Appeals.
Civil cases deal with someone who has been arrested for violating policy, while criminal cases deal with private conflicts between individuals.
Question 9(Multiple Choice Worth 5 points)
(02.05 MC)
A citizen of Mexico residing in Utah accuses a local university of violating civil rights. Which court would hear the case?
State court in Utah
U.S. District Court in Utah
U.S. Court of Appeals
The Supreme Court
Question 10(Multiple Choice Worth 5 points)
(02.05 LC)
What are the three basic levels of courts?
Local, state, and federal
Trial, civil, and criminal
City, county, and state
Trial, appellate, and supreme
The article in the Constitution that outlines the federal judicial branch is Article III.
Question 7: The verdict as determined by jury decision.
Question 8: Criminal cases deal with someone who is accused of breaking the law, while civil cases deal with disputes between people or groups.
Question 9: U.S. District Court in Utah.
Question 10: Trial, appellate, and supreme.
What informs Article III of the constitution?Article III of the Constitution outlines the structure and powers of the federal judiciary in the United States. It is primarily informed by the framers' intent to establish an independent judiciary that serves as a separate and coequal branch of government.
The language and provisions of Article III draw inspiration from various sources, including English common law, state constitutions, and the experiences and debates of the Constitutional Convention. The framers aimed to create a system of federal courts capable of interpreting and applying the law, resolving disputes, and ensuring the protection of individual rights.
learn more about Article III of the constitution: https://brainly.com/question/1194247
#SPJ1
Using an encyclopedia, the Internet, or other resource, explain the significant role that each of the following leaders played in the sectionalism issue. Type a 300-word biography about each of the following leaders: Calhoun, Clay, Hayne, Jackson, and Webster. Your entire report should be 1,500 words in length.
You should construct your biography using the following arrangement of information: name, birthplace and date, early career, resident state, political offices held, view on states' rights, and solutions enacted.
The biography should be written using proper grammar, spelling, and punctuation. List your research sources in the bibliography.
The positions of Webster, the Federalist and steadfast New England supporter of the Union; Clay, the "war hawk" and National Rebublican leader from the West; and Calhoun, the young nationalist who became the leading spokesperson for the South and slavery were sectionalism.
What is sectionalism?Sectionalism is the excessive dedication to a region's interests over national interests.
There have been conflicts between various regions of the country throughout American history, but from the country's founding until the American Civil War, Northerners' and Southerners' divergent perspectives on the institution of slavery were the most significant sectional divide and the country's defining political issue.
Read more about Sectionalism
https://brainly.com/question/27891016
#SPJ1
The Declaration of Independence explains that the king of Great Britain violated the principle of _______________ by abusing his power over the colonists.
natural law
due process
limited government
equality of all persons
The king of Great Britain violated the principle of limited government by abusing his power over the colonists.
The Declaration of Independence asserts that the king of Great Britain violated the principle of "limited government" by abusing his power over the colonists. The Declaration, drafted primarily by Thomas Jefferson, outlines a list of grievances against King George III and highlights the colonists' justification for declaring independence.The principle of limited government emphasizes that the powers of a government should be restricted and defined by a constitution or a set of laws. It asserts that those in power should be accountable to the people and that their authority should be limited to prevent the abuse of power.In the Declaration of Independence, the colonists accuse King George III of disregarding the limits of his authority and violating the principles of limited government. They argue that he imposed unjust laws, interfered with colonial self-governance, and denied them their rights and liberties.By asserting that the king violated the principle of limited government, the Declaration of Independence underscores the colonists' belief in the necessity of self-governance and their aspiration for a government that respects the rights and freedoms of its citizens.For more questions on Great Britain
https://brainly.com/question/28734617
#SPJ8
C, limited government
Explanation: The king of Great Britain violated the principle of limited government by abusing his power over the colonists. The colonists believed that the king went beyond the limits of his authority and imposed unfair laws on them. This violated the idea that a government's powers should be restricted to prevent the abuse of power. The colonists wanted a government that respected their rights and freedoms.
Happy to help; have a great day! Please remember to give me Brainliest :)
this man led the volunteer “red shirts” against conservative forces
Giuseppe Garibaldi led the "Red Shirts" in their fight against conservative forces during the Italian Risorgimento.
The man who led the volunteer "Red Shirts" against conservative forces was Giuseppe Garibaldi. Garibaldi was an Italian revolutionary and nationalist who played a crucial role in the unification of Italy in the 19th century. He organized and commanded the volunteer army known as the "Red Shirts" (or "Garibaldini") during the Italian Risorgimento, a movement for Italian unification.The "Red Shirts" were a paramilitary force of volunteers who fought against various conservative forces that opposed Italian unification. They were known for their distinctive red shirts and played a significant role in several military campaigns. Garibaldi's leadership and military strategies were instrumental in achieving victories and expanding the influence of the Italian nationalist movement.Garibaldi's efforts with the "Red Shirts" helped to secure key regions of Italy and contributed to the eventual formation of a unified Italian state. His dedication to the cause of Italian unification and his ability to rally and lead volunteers in battle made him a prominent figure in the history of Italy and a symbol of the Risorgimento movement.In summary, Giuseppe Garibaldi led the volunteer "Red Shirts" in their fight against conservative forces, and his leadership was crucial in the process of Italian unification.For more questions on Italian
https://brainly.com/question/22155070
#SPJ8
14. What is one factor that led to the collapse of communism in the Soviet Union? a. Soviet citizens had too many civil liberties. b. The decisions of the Communist Party led to a struggling economy. c. People became disillusioned with the classless society that had developed. d. An epidemic weakened the health care system.
Answer: I believe it’s B
Explanation:
Which of the following is a method used by states to select state judges?
Election by votes in Congress
Election by the Supreme Court
Appointment by the president
Appointment by the governor
Question 2(Multiple Choice Worth 5 points)
(02.06 LC)
Which Supreme Court case established its power and legitimacy and expanded its role?
Brown v. Board of Education
Korematsu v. United States
Marbury v. Madison
California v. Bakke
Question 3(Multiple Choice Worth 5 points)
(02.06 MC)
A court requires payment of damages from one party to another. Which term describes this outcome?
Judicial review
Remedy
Commission
Fair verdict
Question 4(Multiple Choice Worth 5 points)
(02.06 MC)
Why do some Americans prefer the appointment of judges rather than elections?
They believe appointments cost less public money than if potential judges run campaigns.
They believe appointments allow judges to focus on the will of the people in judicial review.
They believe appointments free judges from the pressures of public support and re-election.
They believe appointments lead judges to be dependent on the other government branches.
Question 5(Multiple Choice Worth 5 points)
(02.06 MC)
What was the decision in the landmark Supreme Court decision in California v. Bakke?
Other students were chosen over Allan Bakke for admission.
Denial of Allan Bakke's admission was upheld by the Court.
The equal protection clause did not apply to Bakke's case.
The equal protection clause supported Bakke's case.
1. Appointment by the governor is a method used by states to select state judges.
The governor has the authority to appoint judges, ensuring a level of political influence in the judiciary. Therefore, the correct answer is Appointment by the governor.2. Marbury v. Madison is the Supreme Court case that established its power and legitimacy by asserting the principle of judicial review.
This landmark decision expanded the Court's role in interpreting the Constitution and determining the constitutionality of laws.Therefore, the correct answer is Marbury v. Madison.3. When a court requires payment of damages from one party to another, it is referred to as a remedy.
This outcome aims to provide compensation or relief to the aggrieved party for the harm or loss they have suffered. Therefore, the correct answer is Remedy.4. Some Americans prefer the appointment of judges over elections because they believe it frees judges from the pressures of public support and re-election.
They argue that appointed judges can focus on upholding the law and making impartial decisions rather than being influenced by popular opinion. Therefore, the correct answer is ''They believe appointments free judges from the pressures of public support and re-election''.5. In the landmark Supreme Court decision in California v. Bakke, the Court ruled that the equal protection clause supported Bakke's case.
The decision found that the use of racial quotas in university admissions was unconstitutional, emphasizing the principle of equal protection under the law. Therefore, the correct answer is ''The equal protection clause supported Bakke's case.''Find more questions on governor
https://brainly.com/question/16209628
#SPJ8
What was not a nativist response to immigration and immigrants? The 14th amendment
The 14th Amendment was not a nativist response to immigration and immigrants.
The 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution ratified in 1868, granted citizenship to all individuals born or naturalized in the United States, regardless of their ethnicity or immigration status. It was a significant step towards ensuring equal protection under the law for all individuals, including immigrants.
On the other hand, the other options mentioned - the passage of the Chinese Exclusion Act, mob violence toward immigrants, and the Dillingham report - can be seen as nativist responses to immigration. The Chinese Exclusion Act passed in 1882, was a federal law that severely restricted immigration from China.
It was the first significant immigration restriction targeting a specific nationality and reflected nativist sentiments and anti-Chinese sentiment prevalent at the time. Mob violence toward immigrants, particularly in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, often targeted certain immigrant groups deemed undesirable by nativist factions.
These acts of violence, such as the Chinese Massacre of 1871 or the violence against Italian immigrants in the late 19th century, were fueled by nativist fears and prejudices.
The Question was Incomplete, Find the full content below :
What was not a nativist response to immigration and immigrants?
passage of the Chinese Exclusion Act
the 14th Amendment
mob violence toward immigrants
the Dillingham report
know more about 14th Amendment here:
https://brainly.com/question/500095
#SPJ8
In an era of bad harvests, famine, and rioting, the French government took steps to improve the worsening financial crisis. What did the government do? The government raised taxes. The government called for genuine political reform. The government forced all estates to pay the same taxes. The government reduced the Third Estate’s tax burden.™®
The French government during this period raised taxes, called for genuine political reform, and attempted to equalize the tax burden across estates, but it did not reduce the tax burden specifically for the Third Estate.
During the era characterized by bad harvests, famine, and rioting in France, the government implemented several measures to address the worsening financial crisis.
Firstly, the government opted to raise taxes as a means of generating additional revenue. This decision aimed to alleviate the economic strain and stabilize public finances.
Furthermore, in response to growing calls for political reform, the government initiated efforts to bring about genuine political changes. These reforms sought to address the grievances and demands of the population, aiming to foster a fairer and more representative political system.
In an attempt to tackle the issue of economic inequality, the government introduced a policy mandating that all estates, regardless of their social standing, pay the same taxes.
This move aimed to create a more equitable tax system, reducing the burden on the lower classes and redistributing the tax responsibility more evenly across society.
It is worth noting that the reduction of the Third Estate's tax burden, representing the commoners and middle-class citizens, is not historically accurate.
In fact, the Third Estate bore the brunt of the tax burden, leading to widespread dissatisfaction and contributing to the social unrest that eventually culminated in the French Revolution.
For more such questions government,click on
https://brainly.com/question/1772602
#SPJ8
Which statement about modern Israel is most accurate?
It is made up only of Jewish people.
It is the homeland for Jewish people.
It has been a Jewish holy site for less than 20 years.
It features ancient architecture and rejects modern design.
Answer: B
Explanation:
There were many casses of the enlightenment Homever, a particular revolution plaved an important role in is development. This revolution was of decoveries made by scier such as Isaac Mention and Gailles Gallel. They dug deep imto the realms of science to discover new laws of ph and decipher the mysteries of the universe. This revolution refuted the claims of the Catholic Church about the postion of Ear in the solar system This revolution is called the
Which statement about the U.S. judicial system is true?
The Judiciary Act of 1789 established and organized the system of lower federal courts.
Article III of the Constitution identified three types of courts at the state and federal levels.
The Rooker-Feldman Doctrine requires that all cases must first be heard in a state trial court.
The Erie Doctrine prevents state courts from hearing any case involving a federal law or policy.
Question 2(Multiple Choice Worth 5 points)
(02.05 MC)
A person from Virginia receives a speeding ticket in the State of North Carolina. The driver challenges the legality of the ticket. Which court would have jurisdiction?
State court in Virginia
State court in North Carolina
U.S. District Court in Virginia
U.S. District Court in North Carolina
Question 3(Multiple Choice Worth 5 points)
(02.05 LC)
What does original jurisdiction mean?
Right to hear a case the first time it is presented in court
Ruling or outcome of any criminal or civil court case
Petitioning of cases to the highest federal court
Selection of judges for the federal judicial branch
Question 4(Multiple Choice Worth 5 points)
(02.05 MC)
The U.S. Supreme Court rejects a petition to hear a case. What will happen next?
The decision of the lower court will stand.
The case is sent to the U.S. Court of Appeals.
The decision of the lower court is reversed.
The case will be sent to Congress for review.
Question 5(Multiple Choice Worth 5 points)
(02.05 MC)
Which statement is true about the U.S. Court of Appeals?
It has original jurisdiction over federal-question and diversity cases.
A jury listens to evidence and determines the official court ruling.
It can review certain cases from the state-level supreme courts.
A panel of judges hears select cases from a federal trial court.
The statement that is true about the U.S. judicial system is "The Judiciary Act of 1789 established and organized the system of lower federal courts." (Option A).
The court that would have jurisdiction in the case of a person from Virginia receiving a speeding ticket in the State of North Carolina would be "State court in North Carolina." (Option B).
"Original jurisdiction" means the "Right to hear a case the first time it is presented in court." (Option A)
When the U.S. Supreme Court rejects a petition to hear a case, the outcome is that "The decision of the lower court will stand." (Option A).
Question 5: The true statement about the U.S. Court of Appeals is that "A panel of judges hears select cases from a federal trial court." (Option D).
What is a Judicial System?A legal system refers to bureaucracy of courts and legal organizations that are responsible for defining and applying the society in a country or jurisdiction. It is a important component of the overall legal structure and is tasked accompanying resolving disputes, executing justice, and maintaining the rule of law.
The legal systemtypically resides of various levels of courts, varying from trial courts or lower courts to appellate courts and, in some cases, a highest federal court. Each level of the court has its own area of authority and authority to handle particular types of cases.
Learn more about judicial system here: https://brainly.com/question/12694841
#SPJ1
Answer: a b a a d
Explanation:
what advantages did the us have that made it ripe for rapid industrialization? Check all that apply
Abundant resources, agricultural productivity, technological innovations, capital access, immigration, and infrastructure development were advantages for rapid industrialization in the US.
The United States had several advantages that made it ripe for rapid industrialization. Some of these advantages include:1. Abundant Natural Resources: The U.S. possessed vast reserves of natural resources such as coal, iron ore, oil, and timber, providing the necessary raw materials for industrial production.2. Expansive Land and Agricultural Productivity: The availability of fertile land and favorable agricultural conditions allowed for a surplus of food production. This surplus supported a growing population and freed up labor for industrial work.3. Technological Innovations: The U.S. fostered a culture of innovation, leading to advancements in technology and machinery. Innovations like the telegraph, steam engine, and assembly line revolutionized industrial processes and increased productivity.4. Access to Capital and Investment: The U.S. had a strong financial system, access to capital, and a favorable business climate that encouraged entrepreneurship and investment in industrial ventures.5. Immigration and a Diverse Workforce: The U.S. experienced significant immigration, which brought in a diverse workforce. Immigrants contributed to the labor force, bringing new skills and ideas to fuel industrial growth.6. Infrastructure Development: The U.S. invested in building an extensive transportation network, including railroads, canals, and later, highways, facilitating the movement of goods and people across the country.In conclusion, the advantages that made the United States ripe for rapid industrialization include abundant natural resources, expansive land and agricultural productivity, technological innovations, access to capital and investment, immigration, and infrastructure development.For more questions on industrialization
https://brainly.com/question/1078028
#SPJ8
Complete question:
What advantages did the US have that made it ripe for rapid industrialization? Check all that apply.
- massive forests
- access to two oceans
- rich mineral resources
- fertile land
- railroads
in which year did the number of jewish refugees nearly double from the previous year?
The number of Jewish refugees nearly doubling from the previous year occurred predominantly during and after World War II, specifically in the years 1945 and 1946.
The Jewish refugees during the world war 2Due to the Holocaust and Nazi persecution, millions of Jews were forced to flee their homes during World War II. Although it is difficult to pinpoint an exact figure, millions are thought to have sought safety. Many people escaped Nazi occupied areas and looked for refuge in other nations. However, because to limiting immigration laws and resistance from many countries, a sizable portion were unable to find refuge and sadly perished.
Jewish refugees increased significantly in 1938 as a result of the bloody Kristallnacht events. In the years that followed the liberation of the concentration camps, between 1945 and 1948, the majority of Jewish refugees arrived. Relocation efforts were made, and the founding of Israel in 1948 gave many Jewish exiles and displaced people a place to call home.
Learn more on World war 2 here https://brainly.com/question/651584
#SPJ1
Answer:
1938
Explanation:
Took the test on Edge
An outcome of the slave codes in the southern colonies during the 1600s was that?
Answer:
Explanation:
----------------------------------------------------
