The statement "The justices have broad latitude to decide which cases they will hear and generally hear only those cases they deem to raise the most important issues." best describes the supreme court.
The United States Supreme Court has a lot of leeway in deciding which cases it will hear. The Court's authority is determined by its own discretion in addition to the Constitution. The justices have the power to choose cases that they think raise important federal law issues and have the potential to have a significant social impact.
By using their discretion, they give cases involving constitutional issues, legal disputes or important national issues the highest priority. Although the Court receives a sizable number of appeals each year, it only allows a small portion of those for full consideration and oral argument. The Court can concentrate its attention on cases with the greatest legal and societal significance due to this selective process.
Learn more about supreme court at:
brainly.com/question/29759733
#SPJ4
The complete question is "Which of the following statements best describes the Supreme Court?
a. The justices have no discretion whatsoever to decide which cases they will hear because their jurisdiction is defined entirely by the Constitution.
b. The justices have limited discretion to decide which cases they will hear and they are forced to hear many cases that address only narrow, technical issues of federal law.
c. The justices have limited discretion to decide which cases they will hear, and they are forced to hear only those cases that raise the most important issues of federal law.
d. The justices have broad latitude to decide which cases they will hear and generally hear only those cases they deem to raise the most important issues.
e. The justices have broad latitude to decide which cases they will hear and generally avoid those cases that they deem to raise the most important issues."
T/F A person who is in possession of a negotiable instrument that is drawn, issued, or indorsed to him or to his order, or to bearer, or in blank is called a(n) holder
The statement "A person who is in possession of a negotiable instrument that is drawn, issued, or indorsed to him or to his order, or to bearer, or in blank is called a(n) holder" is true as it is a true definition of holder.
A "holder" is a person who has a negotiable instrument in their possession that is drawn issued or inscribed to them their order to bearer or in blank. A holder is someone who has the legal right to exercise the privileges and rights attached to a negotiable instrument such as a promissory note a check or a bill of exchange.
The holder may be the initial payee, a subsequent transferee, or a third party who obtains the instrument by endorsement or negotiation. They have the authority to receive payment, transfer the instrument or enforce the terms of it as the holder.
Learn more about negotiable instrument at:
brainly.com/question/3522225
#SPJ4
the difference between a marine-protected area and a marine reserve is __________.
"The difference between a marine-protected area and a marine reserve is  that marine reserves are typically more restrictive than marine-protected areas when it comes to regulating human activities. "
Marine-protected areas (MPAs) are defined as zones in which human activity is regulated to provide long-term conservation of nature. MPAs are typically used to protect and conserve fish and other marine animals, plants, and other resources.
A marine reserve is a protected area of ocean that is protected from fishing and other human activity. It is a type of marine-protected area that is designed to protect and conserve marine life in a specific region.
The difference between a marine-protected area and a marine reserve
Marine reserves, unlike marine-protected areas, are a more restrictive form of conservation. Fishing and other human activities are entirely prohibited in marine reserves. Marine-protected areas, on the other hand, can allow certain activities depending on the level of protection required, such as fishing or recreational boating.
In a nutshell, the main difference between marine-protected areas and marine reserves is that marine reserves are typically more restrictive than marine-protected areas when it comes to regulating human activities.
learn more about marine reserve here:
https://brainly.com/question/29673658
#SPJ11
Alternative dispute resolution is favored in international disputes because of questions surrounding:
(all that apply)
-awards
-jurisdiction
-timing
Answer:Alternative dispute resolution is favored in international disputes because of questions surrounding:
Answer:awards and jurisdiction
Explanation:
Contrary to popular belief, the Endangered Species Act allows ________.
Contrary to popular belief, the Endangered Species Act allows for a range of activities and provisions that aim to balance conservation efforts with human needs and interests.
While the primary goal of the Act is to protect and recover endangered and threatened species and their habitats, it does not prohibit all human activities.
Instead, it provides a framework for managing and mitigating potential impacts.
The Act allows for various exemptions and exceptions that permit certain activities. These include activities that have been authorized by permits or agreements issued by the relevant wildlife agencies.
Such permits can be obtained for scientific research, habitat restoration, captive breeding programs, and incidental take of endangered species during otherwise lawful activities.
Additionally, the Act recognizes the need for economic considerations and includes provisions for cooperation with landowners, land-use planning, and compensatory mitigation measures.
It promotes the development and implementation of conservation plans that balance the protection of species with other societal goals.
Overall, the Endangered Species Act seeks to find a balance between species conservation and human activities, ensuring that endangered species are protected while also recognizing the importance of economic and societal needs.
To know more about Species Act refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/19655487#
#SPJ11
do nfl players get fined for giving football in stands?
Yes, NFL players can be fined for giving a football to fans in the stands. The NFL has strict rules regarding player conduct during games, and one of these rules prohibits players from giving away footballs to fans in the stands.
This rule is in place for a few reasons such as:
First, it is meant to maintain fairness and consistency in the game, as giving away footballs could potentially disrupt the flow of play. Additionally, the NFL wants to ensure the safety of fans by discouraging players from throwing objects into the stands, which could cause injury.
If a player is caught giving a football to a fan, they can be subject to fines by the league. The fines are typically issued as disciplinary measures to uphold the integrity of the game and to discourage behaviors that deviate from the established rules.
In conclusion, while players may have the desire to interact with fans and give away footballs as a gesture of appreciation, the NFL prohibits this practice to maintain fairness, safety, and consistency. The league enforces fines to discourage such actions and maintain the integrity of the game.
To know more about NFL refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/30752718#
#SPJ11
The DEA announces a new policy that increases jail time for anyone caught selling heroin. The policy may be expected to
a. reduce the equilibrium quantity of heroin supplied
b. reduce the supply of heroin
c. reduce the equilibrium quantity of heroin demanded
The DEA announces a new policy that increases jail time for anyone caught selling heroin. The policy may be expected to reduce the supply of heroin. The correct option is b.
It is possible to anticipate that the DEA's recently announced policy, which increases jail time for selling heroin, will decrease the heroin supply. The goal of the policy is to discourage people from engaging in the sale of heroin by enforcing harsher penalties and longer prison terms.
A decrease in the overall supply of heroin may result from the threat of harsher punishments discouraging suppliers and distributors from participating in the black market. It is crucial to remember that the policy's effect on the equilibrium amount of heroin demanded would depend on a number of variables, including shifts in consumer behavior, addiction rates and the accessibility of substitute drugs.
Learn more about DEA at:
brainly.com/question/28197224
#SPJ4
the public issues on which the people's attention is focused
The public issues on which the people's attention is focused are called agenda setting.
Agenda setting is the procedure by which the media selects and emphasises specific public issues, frequently those concerning politics, over others. This phenomenon occurs when a topic receives more focus and attention than others, resulting in its increased importance and prominence in the public eye.
Agenda setting occurs when the media decides which issues should be emphasised. The media's influence on public opinion is a consequence of the agenda-setting concept. When the media identifies a topic as crucial and newsworthy, people tend to view it as such. This can influence public opinion by encouraging people to focus on certain issues more than others.In conclusion, public issues that receive more attention than others are referred to as agenda-setting issues.
The term "ability to influence the importance placed on the topics of the public agenda" refers to agenda setting. The theory, which has been extensively researched and applied to a variety of media, asserts that the media can influence public opinion by determining which issues receive the most attention.
Know more about Agenda setting :
https://brainly.com/question/31850400
#SPJ11
Which of these factors contributes to citizens feeling far removed from the national government and their elected representatives?
A. Westward expansion
B. The absence of district offices for members of the House of Representatives
C. Population growth
D. A substantial decline in the Protestant community
The absence of district offices for members of the House of Representatives contributes to citizens feeling far removed from the national government and their elected representatives. The correct option is B.
One factor that contributes to constituents feeling cut off from the federal government and their elected representatives is the lack of district offices for members of the House of Representatives among the options available. Direct interaction and communication between constituents and their representatives are greatly encouraged by district offices. These offices offer a local presence and accessibility, enabling people to express their concerns, ask for help and have fruitful conversations with their elected representatives.
Without district offices, people may feel cut off from their representatives and have fewer opportunities to engage with them, which could make them feel distant and detached from the federal government. By allowing for a more accessible and accommodating local representation for citizens, district offices help close this gap.
Learn more about House of Representatives at:
brainly.com/question/29391300
#SPJ4
the supreme court process of selecting a case is known as the _____. a. rule of four b. rule of five c. rule of seven d. rune of nine
The Supreme Court process of selecting a case is known as the "rule of four." Option A is correct.
What is the Supreme Court?The Supreme Court is the highest court in the United States of America. It was created under Article III of the Constitution to be the country's ultimate legal authority. The Court is made up of nine justices appointed by the President of the United States, with the advice and consent of the Senate. The Constitution does not specify the qualifications for serving as a justice, but historically, they have been lawyers with considerable legal experience.
The Supreme Court process of selecting a case is known as the "rule of four." This is a term used to describe the process by which four of the nine Justices of the Supreme Court must agree to hear a case before it can be granted a writ of certiorari.A writ of certiorari is a document that orders a lower court to send the records of a case to the Supreme Court for review. If the Court agrees to hear a case, it will issue a writ of certiorari. If the Court does not agree to hear a case, the lower court's ruling stands.
Option A holds true.
Learn more about the supreme court: https://brainly.com/question/18228641
#SPJ11
Which of the following statements is correct regarding covenants against assignment or sublease?
A. If a tenant transfers her interest in violation of a covenant against assignment or sublease, the transfer is void.
B. A covenant against assignment prevents the tenant from subleasing her interest.
C. If a landlord consents to one transfer that violates a covenant against assignment or sublease, he waives his right to avoid future transfers.
D. A covenant against assignment or sublease is an unreasonable restraint on alienation.
If a landlord consents to one transfer that violates a covenant against assignment or sublease, he waives his right to avoid future transfers is correct regarding covenants against assignment or sublease. The correct option is C.
In other words, if a landlord consents or approves a tenant's transfer of interest in defiance of a restriction against assignment or subleasing, the landlord cannot later prevent or invalidate additional transfers. The landlord effectively waives their right to enforcing the prohibition against assignment or subleasing for subsequent transfers by giving their consent.
Due to the potential impact on the enforceability of such covenants and the tenants ability to transfer their interests, it is crucial for landlords and tenants to understand the ramifications of giving or receiving consent in relation to covenants against assignment or sublease.
Learn more about tenant's transfer at:
brainly.com/question/17161352
#SPJ4
In 2015, the ______ pronounced that workplace discrimination on the grounds of sexual orientation is illegal, according to federal law.
In 2015, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) pronounced that workplace discrimination on the grounds of sexual orientation is illegal, according to federal law.
The EEOC, an independent federal agency responsible for enforcing anti-discrimination laws in the workplace, made this declaration based on its interpretation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Title VII prohibits employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, and national origin.
While Title VII does not explicitly mention sexual orientation as a protected characteristic, the EEOC asserted that discrimination based on sexual orientation is a form of sex discrimination. The EEOC argued that discrimination based on an individual's sexual orientation necessarily involves considerations of their sex or gender, and thus falls under the purview of Title VII.
This pronouncement by the EEOC carried significant weight as it clarified the agency's stance on workplace discrimination based on sexual orientation. It provided guidance to employers, employees, and courts regarding the interpretation of federal law and served as a foundation for subsequent legal developments in this area.
Learn more about federal law here
https://brainly.com/question/14696247
#SPJ11
in american government’s federal framework, sovereignty (that is, supreme and independent political authority) is
In the American federal framework, sovereignty is divided between the federal government and the individual states.
In the federal structure of the American government, the federal government and the various states share the supreme and independent political authority known as sovereignty. A key component of federalism is this division of sovereignty. All other powers are reserved to the states or the people, as stated in the Tenth Amendment, according to the U.S. Constitution which establishes the federal government as a limited government with only those powers granted to it.
The states retain residual authority to run their internal affairs, while the federal government has certain enumerated powers, such as the ability to control interstate commerce and declare war. Within the American political system, this shared sovereignty ensures a balance between national leadership and state autonomy.
Learn more about federal structure at:
brainly.com/question/31417366
#SPJ4
the foundation of islamic civilization is the shari'a, or
The Shari'a, or Islamic law, forms the foundation of Islamic civilization, guiding Muslims in personal conduct, family matters, business transactions, and governance. Derived from the Qur'an and Hadith, it encompasses legal, ethical, and moral principles, promoting justice, fairness, and the well-being of individuals and society.
The foundation of Islamic civilization is the Shari'a, or Islamic law. The Shari'a is derived from the Qur'an, the holy book of Islam, as well as the Hadith, which are the recorded sayings and actions of the Prophet Muhammad.
It serves as a comprehensive legal and ethical framework that guides Muslims in all aspects of life, including personal conduct, family matters, business transactions, and governance.
The Shari'a encompasses a wide range of principles and regulations that aim to promote justice, fairness, and the well-being of individuals and society as a whole.
It covers various aspects of life, including worship, morality, social interactions, and legal matters.
Islamic scholars and jurists interpret and apply the Shari'a based on its foundational sources and principles, adapting it to different contexts and changing circumstances throughout history.
While the Shari'a is often associated with the legal system, it also encompasses moral and ethical guidelines that shape the values and behaviors of Muslims.
It emphasizes principles such as justice, compassion, equality, and accountability.
The influence of the Shari'a can be seen in the development of Islamic art, architecture, literature, science, and governance throughout history, as it provided a framework for Muslims to navigate their personal and collective lives in accordance with their faith.
To know more about Islamic civilization refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/17410346#
#SPJ11
Acme would win because according Contract to law of the previous
contract the payment for the lease is 1000, however when she extend
the lease, there is no discusion the change in price, or auntien
co
Acme would win the dispute as per the previous contract terms, which state that the lease payment is $1000.
According to the previous contract, Acme would win the lease payment dispute. The contract stated that the payment for the lease is $1000. When the lease was extended, there was no discussion about changing the price. Therefore, Acme is entitled to receive the lease payment of $1000.
To explain this step-by-step, first, we need to understand that a contract is a legally binding agreement between parties. In this case, the contract stated that the lease payment is $1000. This means that the lessee (Acme) is obligated to pay this amount.
Next, when the lease was extended, there was no discussion or agreement about changing the price. This implies that the terms of the original contract still apply, including the payment amount of $1000.
Based on these facts, Acme would win the dispute because the contract clearly specifies the lease payment as $1000, and there is no evidence of any agreed-upon changes.
To learn more about dispute
https://brainly.com/question/33618000
#SPJ11
the new southern state constitutions mandated by the reconstruction acts introduced
The new southern state constitutions mandated by the Reconstruction Acts introduced universal male suffrage and equal protection under the law.
Significant amendments were made to the new southern state constitutions required by the Reconstruction Acts in order to address the effects of the Civil War and advance equality. These adjustments included granting universal male suffrage and restoring voting rights to previously excluded African American men. Equal protection under the law was also emphasized by the constitutions, which made sure that every citizen regardless of race or color was given the same legal rights and protections.
Additionally, in accordance with the outcome of the war and the dissolution of the Confederate States, the new constitutions outlawed slavery. Another prerequisite was the ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment, which ensures citizenship and equal protection for all people. Overall, these actions aimed to rebuild the southern states and lay the groundwork for a society that is more inclusive and just.
Learn more about Reconstruction Acts at:
brainly.com/question/32797321
#SPJ4
although it can be dangerous to use mobile devices when driving a car, state governments have yet to enact any laws restricting this behavior.
The penalties for breaking the laws should be severe to deter people from using their mobile devices while driving.
Using mobile devices while driving is dangerous.
This behavior is not restricted by state governments by enacting laws. Even though there is substantial proof that utilizing a cell phone while driving is hazardous, many people still do it.
The reason for this is that people think they can handle the task without any difficulty. They fail to understand that using mobile devices when driving is similar to driving under the influence of alcohol. It's difficult to control and will almost always result in accidents.
As a result, all state governments must impose strict laws on mobile phone usage when driving to avoid accidents and save lives. It is necessary to impose hefty fines, suspensions, and demerits on individuals who use mobile devices while driving.
The penalties for breaking these laws should be severe to deter people from using their mobile devices while driving.
learn more about penalties here:
https://brainly.com/question/31318693
#SPJ11
