Caddies wear white jumpsuits to show that they are important in the tournament.
Over some time in the history of the tournament, jumpsuits have become a unique symbol for the masters. Many people think of jumpsuits when they think of the tournament.
To indicate the serious nature of their jobs, caddies wear white boiler suits. The caddie used by golfers at masters decides the golfer's success.
They are in charge of a variety of tasks during the tournament such as carrying clubs, reading the greens, and helping the competitors in choosing the clubs.
Caddies wear white jumpsuits to show their importance in the tournament.
For more information on Caddy,
https://brainly.com/question/15730029
"We'd be like worms, don't you see, in an apple."
This is a quote from John Steinbeck's novel "Of Mice and Men". It is spoken by the character George, and he is talking to his friend Lennie about their shared dream of owning a farm.
George is explaining to Lennie how, if they work hard and save their money, they will be able to buy their own land and be their own bosses. He uses the analogy of worms in an apple to describe how they feel working for someone else, and how they want to break free and create a life for themselves. The quote reflects the theme of the American Dream, and the desire for individual freedom and self-determination.
"We'd be like worms, don't you see, in an apple" is a metaphorical expression used to convey a sense of confinement and entrapment. It suggests that the speaker feels trapped in a particular situation, and that they are powerless to change it. The metaphor of worms in an apple suggests that the speaker and their companions are insignificant and helpless, like worms in a fruit that they cannot escape from.
To know more about John Steinbeck, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/4976461
#SPJ11
Which led to increased turmoil between jews and arabs? select three options.
The creation of Israel, the Balfour Declaration and Jewish emigration to Palestine led to increased turmoil between Jews and Arabs. So the option A , C and E is correct.
The Balfour Declaration of 1917 had a significant impact on the establishment of Israel in 1948, which was the result of years of Jewish immigration to Palestine. The British government supported the creation of a "national home for the Jewish people" in Palestine in this declaration made during World War I.
This announcement was viewed as a significant win for the Zionist movement, which favored the Jewish people's return to their historic homeland.
The local Arab people, however, reacted angrily to this announcement because they felt that it violated their rights and regional sovereignty. In 1948, violence broke out between the two communities as a result of the inflow of Jewish settlers and the establishment of a Jewish state in Palestine. So the option A , C and E is correct.
To learn more about Jews and Arabs link is here
brainly.com/question/9566045
#SPJ4
The complete question is:
Which led to increased turmoil between Jews and Arabs? Select three options.
A. the creation of Israel
B. anti-Semitism in Germany
C. the Balfour Declaration
D. the Camp David Accords
E. Jewish emigration to Palestine
a theatre critic attends a performance of a debut play at their local community theater. upon the play's conclusion, the playwright asks for the critic's input. she tells the writer that while the idea for the story was good, she felt that the characters and conflict weren't fully developed. which portion of the plot was lacking? climax falling action resolution rising action
The theatre critic felt that the characters and conflict weren't fully developed in the debut play at the local community theater. This means that the portion of the plot that was lacking is the rising action.
According to the example you gave, the plot's escalating action was what was missing. The plot's rising action is the section where conflict and tension are intensified in the run-up to the climax. The criticism in this instance indicated that the growing action was insufficient to fully captivate the audience and build up to a satisfying conclusion because the critic felt that the characters and conflict were not properly developed. To tell a gripping and engrossing story, playwrights must pay close attention to every aspect of the storyline, especially the rising action.
Characters and conflict are established during the increasing action, which prepares the audience for the climax. This includes incidents and circumstances that raise the stakes and advance the plot towards the climax, which is the story's high point. The mounting action in the play was clearly not executed well, as the critic pointed out the underdeveloped characters and conflict.
Learn more about rising action here:
https://brainly.com/question/30243050
#SPJ11
How does Black Hawk's rhetoric in this excerpt advance viewpoint that his cultural experience has fueled in him great animosity for white men ?
The white men despise the Indians, and drive them from their homes . But the Indians are not deceitful . The white men speak bad of the Indian , and look at him spitefully . But the Indian does not tell liesIndians do not steal
A.) He creates an extended metaphor to suggest he has a thorough understanding of white men .
B.) He uses alliteration to emphasize the morals and values of the Indians
C.) He employs personification to capture the confusion he feels when dealing with white men .
D.) He contrasts the image of white men driving Indians from their homes with examples of the admirable conduct of Indians .
Answer:D
Explanation:
Answer:
D.) He contrasts the image of white men driving Indians from their homes with examples of the admirable conduct of Indians.
Explanation:
In this excerpt, Black Hawk contrasts the negative behavior of white men, whom he accuses of despising and driving out Indians from their homes, with the positive conduct of Indians, whom he portrays as not being deceitful, not telling lies, and not stealing. By highlighting the contrasting behaviors, Black Hawk is advancing the viewpoint that his cultural experience has fueled in him great animosity for white men. He is using a rhetorical strategy of contrasting the negative actions of white men with the admirable actions of Indians to emphasize his resentment towards white men and to suggest that his cultural experience has led to this animosity. This rhetorical approach aims to create a stark contrast between the negative treatment of Indians by white men and the positive virtues of Indians, thereby reinforcing Black Hawk's perspective of cultural conflict and mistreatment by white men.
T/F: Without the resurrection, Christianity is relatively unaffected because Jesus' teachings are still intact.
False. Without the resurrection, Christianity is relatively unaffected because Jesus' teachings are still intact.
The resurrection of Jesus Christ is a cornerstone of Christian faith, as it confirms Jesus' identity as the Son of God and validates the truth of His teachings. If the resurrection did not occur, then Christianity would be radically different, as the entire message and meaning of the faith would be undermined. In fact, the apostle Paul wrote that if Christ had not been raised, then preaching and believing in the Gospel would be useless and futile (1 Corinthians 15:14-19).
Jesus would be just another teacher or prophet, and His teachings would not have the same authority or power. The resurrection also serves as evidence of Jesus' divinity and the truth of His claims about Himself. Therefore, the truth of the resurrection is essential to the Christian faith.
To know more about resurrection , click here:
https://brainly.com/question/31841194
#SPJ11
5. PART A: How does the account of the Wounded Knee Massacre by the interpreter for General Forsyth, Philip F. Wells, compare to Dewey Beard's depiction of that day?
A. Neither Philip F. Wells or Dewey Beard are sure how the Wounded Knee Massacre escalated so quickly or who is to blame.
B. Philip F. Wells believes the events of Wounded Knee were self-defense, while Dewey Beard believes that it was a misunderstanding that unnecessarily escalated to a massacre.
C. Philip F. Wells, while reluctant, agrees with Dewey Beard's opinion that unnecessary force was used that day at Wounded Knee.
D. Dewey Beard holds his people responsible for the Wounded Knee Massacre, agreeing with Philip F. Wells's assertion that they fired the first shot, even if it was fired due to a misunderstanding.
The account of the Wounded Knee Massacre by the interpreter for General Forsyth, Philip F. Wells, compare to Dewey Beard's depiction of that day by B. Philip F. Wells believes the events of Wounded Knee were self-defense, while Dewey Beard believes that it was a misunderstanding that unnecessarily escalated to a massacre.
What was the Massacre about?Wells depicts the occasions of Injured Knee as a protective activity against the seen risk of the Local American individuals.
Dewey Beard's account tells that the viciousness at Injured Knee was the result of a misconception and miscommunication between the two bunches. He depicts how the Local American individuals were confounded and startled by the sudden appearance of the warriors, and others.
Learn more about Wounded Knee Massacre from
https://brainly.com/question/13424441
#SPJ1
If a source used in a speech requires credit in written form, it also:.
Answer:
First of all, You did not tell that much wheater it's fill-in-the-blank or something else. any these would be the answer
Explanation:
If a source used in a speech requires credit in written form, it also: requires credit through oral citation or attribution during the speech. This means that the speaker must verbally acknowledge the source of the information or idea they are presenting, usually by stating the author's name, the title of the work, and other relevant information, such as the date or publisher.
Proper oral citation is important because it helps the audience understand the source of the information and demonstrates that the speaker has done their research and is using credible sources to support their argument. It also helps to avoid accusations of plagiarism or intellectual dishonesty, which can have serious consequences in academic and professional settings.
He seemed to see fully the pressing necessity of setting aside my intellectual nature, in order to contentment in slavery.' What does this passage mean?
The point of this passage is that he wants to be content and happy in his slavery which in impossible.
Though he appeared to thoroughly understand how important it was for me to suppress his intellect in order to be satisfied in slavery.
He appeared to thoroughly understand how important it was for him to suppress his true feelings in order to be satisfied in slavery.
Chapter 11 makes reference to Mr. Auld's attempt to disregard the abhorrent aspect of slavery, despite the fact that he was not ignorant of it.
When it comes to the period of my life when I planned and ultimately carried out my escape from slavery, I must hang onto it in order to maintain a feeling of who I am.
However, I feel it is appropriate to state my intention not to list all the peculiar circumstances before describing any of them.
To know more about slavery please check the following link
https://brainly.com/question/2567440
#SPJ4
The novel that ponyboy was reading for english class was:.
The novel that Ponyboy was reading for his English class in the book "The Outsiders" by S.E. Hinton was "Gone with the Wind" by Margaret Mitchell.
This classic novel tells the story of a young woman named Scarlett O'Hara and her struggles during the American Civil War and its aftermath. While Ponyboy initially struggled to connect with the book and its themes, he eventually found himself drawn into the story and able to apply its lessons to his own life. "Gone with the Wind" is a complex and nuanced work that explores themes of love, loss, loyalty, and perseverance, and its inclusion in the novel helps to highlight the importance of literature as a means of personal growth and understanding.
Overall, Ponyboy's experience reading this novel serves as a reminder of the transformative power of literature and the role that it can play in shaping our lives and our perspectives.
Learn more about Ponyboy here:
https://brainly.com/question/22291218
#SPJ11
T/F: Communion (also called the "Lord's Supper") is about celebrating the provisions of sustenance (food and drink) that come from God.
The given statement " Communion (also called the "Lord's Supper") is about celebrating the provisions of sustenance (food and drink) that come from God) is True ( because communion does involve the consumption of bread and wine (or grape juice) which symbolize the body and blood of Jesus Christ, respectively).
This act of taking communion is meant to be a reminder of the sacrifice that Jesus made on the cross for our sins and to acknowledge the spiritual sustenance that he provides for us as believers.
However, it is important to note that communion is not solely about celebrating physical sustenance or nourishment from God. It is primarily a spiritual practice meant to foster a deeper relationship with God and with other believers. By partaking in communion together, Christians are affirming their unity in Christ and their commitment to following him.
So while communion does involve the consumption of food and drink, it is ultimately a symbol of our dependence on God for spiritual sustenance and a reminder of our shared faith as members of the body of Christ.
For more question on consumption
https://brainly.com/question/30752333
#SPJ11
you find an excellent quote in a literary journal to support your argument paper on symbols in the work of d.h. lawrence. the quotation you want to cite seems to be too long so you
If the quotation you want to cite in your argument paper on symbols in the work of D.H. Lawrence seems too long, you can use ellipses to indicate that some words have been omitted from the original text.
This will allow you to include the relevant parts of the quotation while still maintaining the clarity and flow of your paper. To use ellipses, you can indicate the omission of words by using three spaced dots (...). If the omitted text includes a period, you should include four spaced dots (....) to indicate the end of the sentence. Be sure to use ellipses accurately and ethically to avoid misrepresenting the author's original intent.
In addition to using ellipses, you may also want to consider summarizing or paraphrasing the quotation to condense it further while still conveying the main idea. This can help you integrate the quotation more smoothly into your paper and avoid excessive block quotations that disrupt the flow of your writing.
To learn more about quotation, visit here
https://brainly.com/question/1228787
#SPJ4
you find an excellent quote in a literary journal to support your argument paper on symbols in the work of d.h. lawrence. the quotation you want to cite seems to be too long. write quotation
the stock issues of a policy argument case are: group of answer choices ill, blame, cure, cost ill, harms, solvency ill, blame, cure fact, value, policy, question
The stock issues of a policy argument case are: Ill - This refers to the problem or issue that the policy is aiming to address. It involves identifying what is wrong or what needs improvement in the current situation.
Harms - This refers to the negative consequences or impacts of the problem or issue. It is important to identify the harms in order to demonstrate why the issue needs to be addressed.
Blame - This involves identifying the causes or responsible parties for the problem or issue. It helps to assign accountability and responsibility for addressing the issue.
Cure - This refers to the proposed policy or solution for addressing the problem or issue. It should be effective, feasible, and appropriate for addressing the identified harms.
Solvency - This involves evaluating the effectiveness of the proposed policy or solution. It considers whether the policy can actually solve the problem or issue and how it can be implemented successfully.
These five stock issues are commonly used in policy argument cases to guide the development of a convincing and effective argument.
To learn more about stock issues, visit here
https://brainly.com/question/30436147
#SPJ4
The stock issues of a policy argument case are: group of answer choices ill, blame, cure, cost ill, harms, solvency ill, blame, cure fact, value, policy, question, explain.
How long did Chris survive in that hostile environment?
Chris survived for approximately 113 days in the hostile environment of the Alaskan wilderness before ultimately succumbing to starvation. He had set out on his journey with minimal supplies and equipment, and had relied on hunting and foraging for sustenance.
However, he was not adequately prepared for the harsh realities of surviving in such a harsh environment, and was unable to find enough food to sustain himself.
During his time in the wilderness, Chris encountered a number of challenges, including dangerous weather conditions, encounters with wild animals, and the difficulty of finding adequate shelter and resources. Despite these obstacles, he remained determined to continue living off the land and experiencing the freedom and solitude of living in the wild.
Ultimately, however, Chris's lack of preparation and experience proved to be his downfall. His tragic story serves as a cautionary tale about the importance of proper planning and preparation when venturing into remote or hostile environments.
For more questions on: equipment
https://brainly.com/question/30924569
#SPJ11
The treatment of the rich in James has more in common with the prophetic writings of the Old Testament than with Jewish wisdom traditions. (True or False).
The statement is True. The book of James in the New Testament contains several passages that criticize the rich for their mistreatment of the poor and their love of money.
These passages have more in common with the prophetic writings of the Old Testament, which often condemned the wealthy for their greed and injustice, than with Jewish wisdom traditions, which tend to focus more on individual ethics and practical advice.
In contrast, Jewish wisdom traditions, such as Proverbs and Ecclesiastes in the new testament, tend to focus more on individual morality and practical advice for living a virtuous life. While these texts do contain warnings against wealth and greed, they do not share the same emphasis on social justice as the prophetic books and the book of James.
To learn more about new testament, visit here
https://brainly.com/question/31149365
#SPJ4
Help with the problem ASAP
Answer: "If you had chosen to keep the volume lower, the batteries in your boom box would have lasted longer," my brother told me.
Explanation: Choose the correctly edited sentence
the slaveholder, in cases not a few, sustains to his slaves the double relation of master and father' What does this passage means?
The passage describes the contradictory relationship between slaveholders and slaves in American slavery, in which slaveholders saw themselves as both masters and paternalistic figures, while ultimately subjecting their slaves to inhumane treatment.
This passage refers to the complex relationship that slaveholders had with their slaves in the context of American slavery. On one hand, slaveholders were the masters of their slaves, who they owned and controlled as property. On the other hand, they often saw themselves as paternalistic figures who took care of their slaves' basic needs and provided for them in a way that they believed was benevolent.
The phrase "double relation of master and father" highlights the contradictory nature of this relationship, in which slaveholders simultaneously exercised absolute power over their slaves and saw themselves as responsible for their welfare. This paternalistic attitude was used to justify the slave system, as slaveholders believed they were providing for their slaves' needs and protecting them from harm.
However, this benevolent facade was often shattered by the harsh realities of slave life, as slaves were subjected to brutal treatment, forced labor, and inhumane living conditions. The relationship between slaveholders and slaves was fundamentally exploitative and dehumanizing, and no amount of paternalistic rhetoric could change that fact.
To learn more about American slavery
https://brainly.com/question/28200915
#SPJ4
Which inequalities are true? select the four correct answers.
2 < 5 and 8 > 3 are the true inequalities.
In mathematics, an inequality is a mathematical expression that shows a relationship between two values that are not equal. In other words, it is a statement that compares two values and indicates how they are related in terms of magnitude, with one value being greater than, less than, or equal to the other.
Inequalities are used in a variety of mathematical contexts, such as solving equations, graphing functions, and modeling real-world situations. They are also an important concept in fields such as economics, where they are used to represent constraints on resources or demand.
-----------The given question is incomplete, the complete question is:
"Which inequalities are true?
A) 2 < 5 and 8 > 3
B) 10 < 3 or 7 > 12
C) 6 >= 6 and 9 <= 8
D) 4 + 3 > 9 or 2 * 5 < 11"------------
To know more about inequalities, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/30228778
#SPJ1
They told a tale of woe which was then altogether beyond my feeble comprehension' What does this passage means?
The passage suggests that the narrator struggled to understand a story of great suffering and highlights the limitations of human understanding and empathy in the face of profound suffering.
The passage suggests that the narrator was unable to fully understand a story of great suffering and misery. The use of the phrase "beyond my feeble comprehension" implies that the narrator's cognitive abilities were inadequate to grasp the extent of the tragedy being described.
The phrase "tale of woe" itself is an expression that denotes a narrative of misfortune, sorrow, or distress. It is possible that the narrator was confronted with a story of extreme hardship that was difficult to comprehend due to its complexity, emotional intensity, or cultural context.
Overall, the passage highlights the limitations of human understanding and empathy in the face of profound suffering. It also suggests that certain experiences may be difficult to fully comprehend without first-hand knowledge or a certain level of emotional intelligence.
To learn more about empathy
https://brainly.com/question/14669414
#SPJ4
The story of ben and arthur demonstrates the power of:.
The story of Ben and Arthur demonstrates the power of love, commitment, and resilience. It is a tale of two men who faced numerous challenges and obstacles but overcame them all because of their deep love for each other. Ben and Arthur's love is so strong that it endures despite societal pressures, discrimination, and even physical violence.
Their commitment to each other is unwavering, as they never give up on their love and continue to fight for their relationship. Despite the many setbacks they face, Ben and Arthur never lose hope and always find a way to keep their love alive. They demonstrate that even in the face of adversity, love can triumph over hate.
Furthermore, the story of Ben and Arthur showcases the power of resilience. Despite the many challenges they face, they refuse to be defeated and always come back stronger. They demonstrate that even when everything seems to be against them, they can still find the strength to keep going and keep fighting for what they believe in.
Overall, the story of Ben and Arthur is a testament to the power of love, commitment, and resilience. It shows us that even in the face of overwhelming obstacles, we can overcome them if we have the courage and determination to do so.
Learn more about Ben and Arthur here:
https://brainly.com/question/31873719
#SPJ11
Tell us about a time you found it difficult to work with someone.
The organization had an automated system where students could report issues with their mental health or other matters that needed attention when I previously served as the director of student support and wellness.
These reports helped me identify which students were having difficulties so that I could get in touch with them and assist them in finding the services they required. Because some of the situations we dealt with were emergent, it was unfortunate that my coworker who processed these reports frequently fell behind in her work and delayed many of our interventions with students.
Although my coworker admitted to being ineffective, I realized that she might not have fully appreciated how the delay had affected the workflow for our entire team.
One day I invited her to lunch and gave my account of the circumstances. My coworker explained that because her processing duties were getting too heavy, it would be better if she shared them with another employee.
Thankfully, after we tried this system, the problem went away on its own within the next two weeks. This experience showed me that with perseverance and teamwork, I can overcome any challenge with my coworkers, no matter how challenging it may seem.
Thus, this was the situation which was hard to deal with.
Learn more about Perseverance, here:
https://brainly.com/question/19734507
#SPJ12
T/F: According to Roman law, any guard who falls asleep when on watch duty was guilty of a capital offense (worthy of the death penalty).
True. In ancient Rome, falling asleep while on watch duty was considered a serious offense, particularly for the Praetorian Guard who were responsible for guarding the Emperor and other high-ranking officials.
The penalty for sleeping on duty was severe, as it was seen as a breach of trust and a failure to carry out one's duty to protect the state. The punishment for such an offense was typically death, and it was carried out swiftly and without mercy. This was because the Romans believed that the safety of the state was of utmost importance, and any negligence or dereliction of duty by those charged with protecting it was seen as a grave threat to the stability and security of the empire. As a result, falling asleep on watch duty was taken very seriously and punished accordingly.
To know more about offense please visit:
https://brainly.com/question/3891238
#SPJ11
when the interviewer asks you questions about the future, you should provide answers that 1. illustrate your interest in their organization and in the open position. 2. show ambition and interest in succeeding with this company. 3. demonstrate you have the skills required for the target position. 4. enable you to work in your practiced success stories.
You should demonstrate your interest in their company and the available position when the interviewer asks you questions regarding the future.
This is a test question to see if your career objectives match the job and the firm. Explain how the position fits into your long-term objectives and aspirations in an honest response. Offer only career aspirations such as management positions, subject-matter expertise, or business ownership.
Listening to the interviewer's questions will help you think of the ideal questions to ask. If the interviewer asks, "Do you have any questions?" an acceptable answer would be, "Yes, I do. According to the interview questions you've been asking, you appear to have a trouble keeping customers.
Learn more about interviewer Visit: brainly.com/question/8846894
#SPJ4
What is the purpose of the underlined part of the sentence?
Jeff spent many hours in the gym, where he developed the skills to compete.
It serves to modify the noun Jeff.
It serves to modify the verb spent.
It serves to modify the noun skills.
It serves to modify the verb developed.
The purpose of the underlined part of the sentence serves to modify the verb developed. So the option D is correct.
The underlined part of the sentence serves to provide additional information about how Jeff acquired the skills needed to compete, specifically that he achieved them through spending time in the gym.
This implies that Jeff invested a significant amount of time and effort into honing his skills, likely through practicing and refining his technique. He also likely took time to research different techniques, strategies, and tools that could help him improve.
Additionally, Jeff may have consulted with experts in the field to gain insight and feedback on his progress. So the option D is correct.
To learn more about developed the skills link is here
brainly.com/question/12348892
#SPJ1
It lifts the veil from the hidden beauty of the world, and makes familiar objects be as if they were not familiar, per percy bysshe shelley:.
Explanation:
Poetry lifts the veil from the hidden beauty of the world, and makes familiar objects be as if they were not familiar.
Read the passage.
Apostrophes
The apostrophe is a widely misused punctuation mark. In proper usage, the apostrophe indicates either a possessive case or where a letter or letters have been removed. An apostrophe is used to indicate a plural in only one special case—when there is a lowercase letter that is plural, such as in the phrase mind your p’s and q’s.
Question
Select the sentence that violates the guidelines for apostrophes.
My brother's dog is very small and very bouncy. She's funny when she gets excited. She runs around in circle's, trying to run and jump at the same time. It's hilarious to see her do this because she ends up doing flips.
Answer:
The sentence that violates the guidelines for apostrophes is: "She runs around in circle's, trying to run and jump at the same time."
Explanation:
The sentence "She runs around in circle's, trying to run and jump at the same time" violates the guidelines for apostrophes because the apostrophe is incorrectly used in the word "circle's." In this context, "circle's" should be plural, which is simply "circles" without an apostrophe. The apostrophe usage here does not indicate a possessive case or a contraction, making it incorrect according to the guidelines provided in the passage.
In saving tobe, why does lazzaro keep shouting out to serafin?.
It is important to provide some context first. "In Saving Tobe" is a short story written by Nadine Gordimer, which explores themes such as race, social inequality, and the human condition. The story is set in South Africa during the apartheid era, a period of institutionalized racial segregation and discrimination.
Lazzaro is one of the main characters in the story, a black man who works as a gardener for a wealthy white family. Serafin is another black man who is also employed by the same family as a driver. The story revolves around the relationship between Lazzaro and Tobe, a young black boy who is orphaned and taken in by the family. Lazzaro becomes very attached to Tobe and tries to protect him from the injustices of the apartheid system.
Now, to answer your question, Lazzaro keeps shouting out to Serafin because he wants to alert him to the danger that Tobe is in. Throughout the story, Lazzaro is acutely aware of the risks that Tobe faces as a young black boy living under apartheid. He knows that Tobe is vulnerable to violence, abuse, and exploitation, and he tries to shield him from harm.
At one point in the story, Tobe is arrested by the police for being in the wrong place at the wrong time. Lazzaro becomes frantic with worry and starts shouting out to Serafin, who is driving the family car, to come back and help. Lazzaro knows that Serafin is better positioned than him to negotiate with the authorities and secure Tobe's release.
In another scene, Lazzaro and Tobe are walking home from the shops when they encounter a group of white men who start taunting them and threatening them with violence. Lazzaro again starts shouting out to Serafin, who is waiting in the car, to come and help. Lazzaro knows that Serafin's presence will deter the men from attacking them and may even help to defuse the situation.
In summary, Lazzaro keeps shouting out to Serafin in "Saving Tobe" because he sees him as a potential ally in his struggle to protect Tobe from harm. Lazzaro knows that he cannot fight the injustices of apartheid alone and that he needs the support and assistance of other black people like Serafin to keep Tobe safe.
Lear more about In Saving Tobe here:
https://brainly.com/question/20626493
#SPJ11
According to Forster, what quality do most people believe will improve the world?
Forster believed that most people think love will improve the world.
Forster was a British novelist and essayist who wrote extensively on social and political issues. In his essay "What I Believe," Forster argues that the quality most people believe will improve the world is love. He believes that love is the most powerful force in the world and that it has the ability to transform individuals and society as a whole. Forster argues that love is not just a feeling, but an active force that requires us to reach out to others, understand their needs, and work towards their well-being. While love may not solve all the world's problems, Forster believes that it is a necessary first step towards creating a more just and equitable world.
To know more about political issues please visit:
https://brainly.com/question/900205
#SPJ11
11.1. what is the name of the bar where the sword fisherman hang out? question 1 options: (a) the crow's nest (b) the fish shack (c) the captain's secret (d) the davy jones
What did Gail believe about Chris's past life?
From the question it seems that Gail believed that Chris had a troubled past life.
This belief is primarily informed by the events and circumstances that led up to Chris's disappearance and subsequent death in the Alaskan wilderness. Gail knew that Chris had abandoned his car and belongings and had set out on foot into the wilderness, seemingly unprepared for the harsh conditions he would encounter.
Additionally, Gail likely knew about Chris's strained relationship with his parents, who he felt had been overly controlling and oppressive. This may have contributed to her belief that Chris was trying to escape from his past life and forge a new identity for himself in the wilderness.
Overall, Gail likely saw Chris as a complex and troubled individual who was searching for meaning and purpose in his life. While she may have sympathized with his struggles, she also recognized the risks and dangers associated with his quest for self-discovery.
For more question on abandoned
https://brainly.com/question/9142792
#SPJ11
Instructions
In 2-3 paragraphs, why does Abigail's simulated terror take in the judges? Explain the implications for
them if they are proven wrong about the girls. Cite specific textual evidence from the play to support your
ideas.
Abigail's terror has the ability to attract the judges because he has a great manipulative capacity and knows well the fears and beliefs of that society.
How does Abigail manage to manipulate the Judges?She knows they tend to believe in witchcraft.She knows they will be moved if she shows fear.She knows they will never admit they are wrong.Abigail provoked the judges to believe and publicize that witchcraft was causing all the problems in the region. That was the moment when her plan was successful because even if the judges found evidence that proved that witchcraft did not exist, they would never admit to being wrong for religious and social reasons, which will destroy their reputation.
Evidence of this is in the quote: "You are pulling down heaven and raising up a w**re!"
This question is about the play "The Crucible."
Learn more about "The Crucible:"
https://brainly.com/question/31414691
#SPJ1
