When determining what should be considered criminal behavior, the pluralist perspective recognize the importance of diversity. Because of society diversity, some behavior may spark debate. How is that debate resolved?
Answer:
The pluralist perspective recognizes that different groups in society may have different perspectives on what should be considered criminal behavior. This can lead to debate and disagreement over what actions should be criminalized and what actions should not be.
One way that this debate is resolved is through the democratic process. In a democratic society, laws and criminal codes are created and amended through the participation of citizens and their elected representatives. This allows for different perspectives and opinions to be heard and considered in the law-making process.
Another way that debate is resolved is through the court system. The court system is responsible for interpreting and applying criminal laws and codes. In cases where there is a disagreement about the interpretation or application of a law, the court system can provide clarification and guidance. For example, when there is disagreement about the meaning of the term "criminal behavior", courts may interpret the law in a way that takes into account the diversity of society and the different perspectives that exist.
Additionally, the debate can be resolved through the use of discretion by law enforcement agencies, prosecutors and judges. Discretion refers to the ability of these actors to make decisions about how to enforce the law in a particular situation. They can take into account the specific circumstances of a case and the diverse perspectives of different groups in society when deciding how to proceed.
Overall, resolving debate over criminal behavior in a pluralist society may involve a combination of these approaches, including democratic process, court interpretation and discretion. It is important to note that the process of resolving debate over criminal behavior is ongoing, as society's values and perspectives continue to evolve over time.
Teenagers when they should stop drinking.
A. tend to know
B. have difficulty knowing
C. ignore
Answer:
Explanation:
the advice
Teenagers tend to know when they should stop drinking, but unfortunately, they often have difficulty actually following through on that knowledge. It is important for parents, teachers, and other adults to provide guidance and advice to teenagers regarding the risks associated with drinking alcohol, as well as the legal ramifications of underage drinking. Many teens will ignore this advice, but providing it can help to ensure that they make educated decisions. Additionally, providing a safe and supportive environment for teenagers to talk about their experiences with alcohol and other substances can help them to understand the potential consequences in a way that is more relevant to their own lives.
does the government accurately represent the people who live in the us? why or why not?
i’m pretty sure this is supposed to be an opinion thing but i don’t have one.. and if it isn’t i still don’t know
omg pleas help me
The government of the U.S. represents its people properly as it follows a representative form of government, where the elected members represent the citizens.
What is a government?A government is a system or group of people governing an organized community, generally a state. In the case of its broad associative definition, government normally consists of legislature, executive, and judiciary. Government is a means by which organizational policies are enforced, as well as a mechanism for determining policy. In many countries, the government has a kind of constitution, a statement of its governing principles and philosophy.
A government is a system to govern a state or community.
Learn more about government, here:
https://brainly.com/question/16940043
#SPJ1
Josue was pulled over for an illegal right-hand turn. After the police officers spoke with Josue, they believed they had reasonable suspicion that a crime
was about to take place. Consequently, Josue was asked to exit the vehicle to be patted down for weapons. Which police procedure did the officers
follow in this situation?
A. officer preservation
B.
stop and frisk
C. probable cause searching
traffic searching
D.
The procedure that the police officers used in the situation, to ask Josue to exit the vehicle was C. probable cause searching
What is probable cause ?Probable cause is a legal standard that must be met before law enforcement officers can make an arrest, conduct a search, or take other similar actions. It refers to a level of suspicion that is based on facts and circumstances that would lead a reasonable person to believe that a crime has been committed, or that certain evidence of a crime will be found in a specific place.
This standard is used to protect citizens against unreasonable searches and seizures, and is an essential element of the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution.
This is therefore what the police officers used in asking Josue to exit the vehicle for searching.
Find out more on probable cause at https://brainly.com/question/28399684
#SPJ1