WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST! HURRY

Answer:

False

Step-by-step explanation:

The greatest sum of two consecutive even integers would be 200 + 198, or 398

Answer:

its true

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Twelve years ago Jane was five times as old as Anne.  

 J-12=5(A-12)

In three years time, Anne will be half of Jane's age.  

A+3=1/2(J+3)

Simplify and solve this system of equations:

 J-12=5(A-12)

A+3=1/2(J+3)

Answer:

The nearest time is 15 years or 180 months

Answer:

C.

Step-by-step explanation:

Base area = 9 × 13

= 117 square feet

Now

Volume of pyramid = (1/3)(A)(H)

= (1/3)(117)(30)

= 117 × 10

= 1170 cubic feet

Answer:

See the explanation

Step-by-step explanation:

If and event can occur in A number of way and fail in B number of ways, then probability of its occurrence is:

[tex]P(A)= \frac{A}{A+B}[/tex]

or probability of its failing is:

[tex]P(B)=\frac{B}{A+B}[/tex]

Rolling a number smaller than 3 in a dice.

A= 2 (1,2)

B = 4 (3,4,5,6)

[tex]P(A)= \frac{2}{2+4}=\frac{1}{3}[/tex]

Definition of Probability in terms of past performances (data). It can be taken as how often things happens divided by all outcomes.

A batter has 50 safe hits at 200 bats, which makes his batting average [tex]\frac{50}{200}= 0.25[/tex] which is the probability.

When you define a probability due to personel beleif in the likelihood of an outcome. It involve no formal calculations and varies from person to person, depending on their past experience.

A person beleives that probability that the batter will hit safely in the next bat is 0.75

Answer:

4

Step-by-step explanation:

10-2(1)=8 which is >=4

10-2(2)=6 which is >=4

10-2(3)=4 which is >=4

10-2(4)=2 which isn't >=4

Therefore 4 doesn't satisfy the inequality

Answer:

4

Step-by-step explanation:

Let's test each possibility.

10-2(1)≥4

10-2=8 so it works

10-2(2)≥4

10-4=6 so it works

10-2(3)≥4

10-6=4 so it works

10-2(4)≥4

10-8=2

2<4 so it dosen't fit the solution

Answer: 62

Step-by-step explanation:

Using the fact that cos(90-x)=sin(x) we get that 90-x=28, so x=62 and the answer is simply 62.

Hope that helped,

-sirswagger21

Answer:

[tex]a^{\frac{9}{2}}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]\left(a^{\frac{3}{2}}\right)^3[/tex]

[tex]=a^{\frac{3}{2}\cdot \:3}[/tex]

[tex]=a^{\frac{3}{2}\cdot \frac{3}{1}}[/tex]

[tex]=a^{\frac{9}{2}}[/tex]

Answer:

[tex]f(theta)=sin(theta) - cos(theta)[/tex] + C

This is my first time doing a double integral, so im only 90% sure in my answer

Step-by-step explanation:

You pretty much want to take the double integral of sinx + cosx

The anti-derivative of sinx = -cosx

The anti-derivative of cosx = sinx

So f' = -cosx + sinx

Now lets take the integral of f':

The anti-derivative of -cosx = sinx

The anti-derivative of sinx = -cosx

So, f(x) = sinx - cosx

============================================================

Work Shown:

I'll use x in place of theta since its easier to type on a keyboard.

f '' (x) = sin(x) + cos(x)

f ' (x) = -cos(x) + sin(x) + C ..... integrate both sides; dont forget the plus C

f ' (0) = 1

f ' (0) = -cos(0) + sin(0) + C

-cos(0) + sin(0) + C = 1

-1 + 0 + C = 1

C = 1+1

C = 2

So,

f ' (x) = -cos(x) + sin(x) + C

turns into

f ' (x) = -cos(x) + sin(x) + 2

----------------------------

Now integrate both sides of the first derivative to get the original f(x) function

f ' (x) = -cos(x) + sin(x) + 2

f(x) = -sin(x) - cos(x) + 2x + D .... apply integral; D is some constant

f(0) = -sin(0) - cos(0) + 2(0) + D

f(0) = 0 - 1 + 0 + D

f(0) = D - 1

f(0) = 2

D-1 = 2

D = 2+1

D = 3

We have f(x) = -sin(x) - cos(x) + 2x + D update to f(x) = -sin(x) - cos(x) + 2x + 3

----------------------------

So f '' (x) = sin(x) + cos(x) becomes f(x) = -sin(x) - cos(x) + 2x + 3 when f(0) = 2 and f ' (0) = 1

The last step is to replace every x with theta so that we get back to the original variable.

f(x) = -sin(x) - cos(x) + 2x + 3   turns into   f(θ) = -sin(θ) - cos(θ) + 2θ + 3

Answer:

5, yes.

Step-by-step explanation :

Answer:

The number of computer is 5 and printer is 3

Answer:

D. 6.3

Step-by-step explanation:

Well you can make a triangle with the line PQ with it's height as 2 and base as 6.

Then you can use the Pythagorean Theorem to find the length of PQ.

a²+b²=c²

2²+6²=c²

4+36=c²

40=c²

c²=40

Square root both sides

c=[tex]\sqrt{40}[/tex]

c≈6.3

Our answer is D. 6.3

Answer:

a) 0.32 = 32% probability that your bid will be accepted

b) 0.72 = 72% probability that your bid will be accepted

c) An amount in excess of $15,400.

Step-by-step explanation:

An uniform probability is a case of probability in which each outcome is equally as likely.

For this situation, we have a lower limit of the distribution that we call a and an upper limit that we call b.

The probability that we find a value X lower than x is given by the following formula.

[tex]P(X \leq x) = \frac{x - a}{b-a}[/tex]

Assume that the competitor's bid x is a random variable that is uniformly distributed between $10,400 and $15,400.

This means that [tex]a = 10400, b = 15400[/tex]

a. Suppose you bid $12,000. What is the probability that your bid will be accepted (to 2 decimals)?

You will win if the competitor bids less than 12000. So

[tex]P(X \leq 12000) = \frac{12000 - 10400}{15400 - 10400} = 0.32[/tex]

0.32 = 32% probability that your bid will be accepted

b. Suppose you bid $14,000. What is the probability that your bid will be accepted?

You will win if the competitor bids less than 14000. So

[tex]P(X \leq 14000) = \frac{14000 - 10400}{15400 - 10400} = 0.72[/tex]

0.72 = 72% probability that your bid will be accepted

c. What amount should you bid to maximize the probability that you get the property (in dollars)?

His bid is uniformly distributed between $10,400 and $15,400.

So, to maximize the probability that you get the property, you should bid an amount in excess of $15,400.

Answer: The answer is 61

Step-by-step explanation: did it on 2020 edg pls mark me brainliest

Answer:

61

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

y+8.5 = 17.2

y = 17.2-8.5

= 8.7

Answer:

y+8.5 = 17.2

y = 17.2-8.5

= 8.7

Step-by-step explanation:

yes the answer above me is correct

Answer:

Null hypothesis is rejected,

test statistic= 15.76

Step-by-step explanation:

sample mean= 113,

sample standard deviation= 68

H0: mean of sample =100

Ha: mean of sample > 100

test statistic= (population mean- sample mean)/√(standard deviation/sample size)

test statistic= (113-100)/√(68/100)= 15.76

Degrees of freeedom= 100-1=99

p-value= 1.658 (from t distribution table for DF=99 and alpha=0.05)

Since p-value is smaller than test statistic, null hypothesis is rejected

Answer:

The total weight of his purchase is 1.08 pounds

Step-by-step explanation:

To find the total weight of his purchase, we sum the weight of each of his purchases.

He purchased:

4/9 pound of peanut.

7/11 pounds of raisins

Total:

The least common multiple between 9 and 11 is 99.

Then

[tex]\frac{4}{9} + \frac{7}{11} = \frac{11*4 + 9*7}{99} = \frac{107}{99} = 1.08[/tex]

The total weight of his purchase is 1.08 pounds

Answer:

Base of the Pennant = 330 pixels

Scale Factor =0.6

Step-by-step explanation:

The base measure of the pennant on screen is 550 pixels.

The height  is 275 pixels.

[tex]A$spect Ratio=\dfrac{Base}{Height}=\dfrac{550}{275} =2:1[/tex]

If Charlotte resizes the pennant, keeping the aspect ratio  constant.

Height = 165 pixels

Therefore:

[tex]\dfrac{Base}{165}=\dfrac{2}{1} \\\\$Base= 2 *165 =330[/tex]

Therefore, the scale factor of the dilation  [tex]=\dfrac{330}{550}= \dfrac{165}{275}=0.6[/tex]

Base of the Pennant = 330 pixels

Scale Factor =0.6

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Area = area of rectangle 1 + area of rectangle 2 + area of rectangle 3 +area of triangle

= 8*12 +  12*9 + 19 *5 +  (1/2) * 4 *12

= 96 + 108 + 95 + 24

= 323 sq. cm

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Let x be the random variable representing the SAT scores for the students at a local high school. Since it is normally distributed and the population mean and population standard deviation are known, we would apply the formula,

z = (x - µ)/σ

Where

x = sample mean

µ = population mean

σ = standard deviation

From the information given,

µ = 1527

σ = 291

the probability to be determined is expressed as P(x > 1207)

P(x > 1207) = 1 - P(x ≤ 1207)

For x < 1208

z = (1207 - 1527)/291 = - 1.1

Looking at the normal distribution table, the probability corresponding to the z score is 0.16

P(x > 1207) = 1 - 0.16 = 0.84

Therefore, the percentage of students from this school earn scores that satisfy the admission requirement is

0.84 × 100 = 84%

Answer:

d = 2

Step-by-step explanation:

Using the formula

A=pq/2

Dont forget to click THANKS

Answer:

a. All measures exist

b. The Mean and the mode

c. Positively skewed

d. The mean and the median

Step-by-step explanation:

a. The frequencies of the data are;

1       2

2      4

3       1

5       2

6       3

9        1

11        1

14        1

15       1

18       1

The formula for mode is given as follows;

The mean = 108/17 = 6.35

The median of 1 1 2 2 2 2 3 5 5 6 6 6 9 11 14 15 18 = (n + 1)/2th term = 9th term  

∴ The median = 5

The mode = 3×Median - 2 × Mean = 15 - 2 × 6.35 = 2.29

Hence all exist

The answer is none theses measures

b. Whereby 18 is replaced by 39 the mean will be then be

(108 + 39 - 18)/17 = 7.59

The median, which is the 9th term remain the same;

Hence only the mean and mode will be affected

c. Since more values are concentrated on the left side of the data distribution, the distribution is positively skewed

d. The largest measurement = 18 the 17th term

Removal will give

Mean = (108 - 18)/16 = 5.625 Mean changes

Median = (16 + 1)/2 th term = 8.5th term = 5 The median remains the same

The mode = 3(Mean - Median) changes

Therefore, the mean and the median will be changed.

Answer: you would need 776 yards to make both dresses

Step-by-step explanation:

You would need to find the sum of the amount if yards needed for both dresses.

The first dress needs 418 yards

The seconds dress needs 358 yards

418 + 358 = 776

Therefore you would need 776 yards to be able to make both of the dresses

Answer:

Are there any choices?..

The correct statement the describes the equation is The lines intersect at (1, 0) and the lines are parallel.

x - y = 1.............equation 1

y - x = 1.............equation 2

Add equations (1) and (2):

(x - y) + (y - x) = 1 + 1

Simplifying

0 = 2

Since 0 = 2, the system is inconsistent, meaning there is no solution. The lines represented by the equations are parallel and will never intersect.

The system of equations has no solution, as the lines represented by the equations are parallel and will never intersect.

learn more about parallel here

brainly.com/question/17405097

#SPJ2

The complete question is- Which statement describes the graph of the system of equations?

[x-y=1

Ly- X= 1

The lines are parallel.

The lines are coinciding.

The lines intersect at(1, 0).

The lines intersect at (-1,0).

Answer:

yes it does

17 is the longest side.

Iff  Iff 17%5E2+=+8%5E2+%2B+15%5E2 it's a right triangle.  it's a right triangle.

Ps "iff" means if and only if

hope it helps

if so please mark me  as brainliest

Answer:

lowest score is 5.35531

highest score is x=5.45961

Step by step Explanation:

· A Z-score reffered to as a numerical measurement that identifies a value's relationship to the mean of a group of values. Z-score is usually measured in terms of standard deviations from the mean.

We were to Consider a value to be significantly low if its z score less than or equal to minus2 or consider a value to be significantly high if its z score is greater than or equal to 2

the z-score is given by:

z-score=(x-μ)/σ

where:

x=score

μ=mean=5.45961

σ=std deviation=0.05215

To calculate the lowest cost when the the z-score is -2, we have

[tex]-2=(x-5.45961)/0.05215[/tex]

To get the value of x then we collect like terms

-0.1043 = =(x-5.45961)

x=-0.1043 + 5.45961

[tex]X=5.35531[/tex]

therefore, the lowest score is 5.35531

Let us calculate the highest score when the z-score is 2 ,

then highest score will be:

[tex]2=(x-5.45961)/0.05215[/tex]

To get the value of x then we collect like terms

0.1043 = =(x-5.45961)

x=0.1043 + 5.45961

[tex]X=5.45961[/tex]

therefore the highest score is x=5.45961

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

BRUH YOU STUPID

Answer:

0

[tex] \\ solution \\ - 2( -5) - 7 + 1( - 3) \\ = 10 - 7 + ( - 3) \\ = 10 - 7 - 3 \\ = 3 - 3 \\ = 0 \\ hop \: it \: helps...[/tex]

Answer:

valarie had 28 pencils , she gave 15 pencils away to people. How many pencils will she have left?

Step-by-step explanation:

hope this helps:)

Answer:

Read below

Step-by-step explanation:

To graph the inequality, place an open circle on -2.5 because there is no line under the > sign. Draw the arrow pointing to the right because the inequality reads "x is greater than -2.5.

As for the check box questions, only B and C should be checked. The arrow points right, and the circle is open.

Answer:

a. Standard deviation: 4.082

Standard error: 2.041

b. The 95% confidence interval for the actual temperature is (298.5, 311.5).

Upper bound: 311.5

Lower bound: 298.5

c. Test statistic t=2.45

P-value = 0.092

d. There is no enough evidence to claim that the dial of the oven is not properly calibrated. The actual temperature does not significantly differ from 300 °F.

e. If we use a significance level of 10% (a less rigorous test, in which the null hypothesis is rejected with with less requirements), the conclusion changes and now there is enough evidence to claim that the dial is not properly calibrated.

This happens because now the P-value (0.092) is smaller than the significance level (0.10), given statististical evidence for the claim.

Step-by-step explanation:

The mean and standard deviation of the sample are:

[tex]M=\dfrac{1}{4}\sum_{i=1}^{4}(305+310+300+305)\\\\\\ M=\dfrac{1220}{4}=305[/tex]

[tex]s=\sqrt{\dfrac{1}{(n-1)}\sum_{i=1}^{4}(x_i-M)^2}\\\\\\s=\sqrt{\dfrac{1}{3}\cdot [(305-(305))^2+(310-(305))^2+(300-(305))^2+(305-(305))^2]}\\\\\\ s=\sqrt{\dfrac{1}{3}\cdot [(0)+(25)+(25)+(0)]}\\\\\\ s=\sqrt{\dfrac{50}{3}}=\sqrt{16.667}\\\\\\s=4.082[/tex]

We have to calculate a 95% confidence interval for the mean.

The population standard deviation is not known, so we have to estimate it from the sample standard deviation and use a t-students distribution to calculate the critical value.

The sample mean is M=305.

The sample size is N=4.

When σ is not known, s divided by the square root of N is used as an estimate of σM (standard error):

[tex]s_M=\dfrac{s}{\sqrt{N}}=\dfrac{4.082}{\sqrt{4}}=\dfrac{4.082}{2}=2.041[/tex]

The degrees of freedom for this sample size are:

[tex]df=n-1=4-1=3[/tex]

The t-value for a 95% confidence interval and 3 degrees of freedom is t=3.18.

The margin of error (MOE) can be calculated as:

[tex]MOE=t\cdot s_M=3.18 \cdot 2.041=6.5[/tex]

Then, the lower and upper bounds of the confidence interval are:

[tex]LL=M-t \cdot s_M = 305-6.5=298.5\\\\UL=M+t \cdot s_M = 305+6.5=311.5[/tex]

The 95% confidence interval for the actual temperature is (298.5, 311.5).

This is a hypothesis test for the population mean.

The claim is that the actual temperature of the oven when the dial is at 300 °F does not significantly differ from 300 °F.

Then, the null and alternative hypothesis are:

[tex]H_0: \mu=300\\\\H_a:\mu\neq 300[/tex]

The significance level is 0.05.

The sample has a size n=4.

The sample mean is M=305.

As the standard deviation of the population is not known, we estimate it with the sample standard deviation, that has a value of s=4.028.

The estimated standard error of the mean is computed using the formula:

[tex]s_M=\dfrac{s}{\sqrt{n}}=\dfrac{4.082}{\sqrt{4}}=2.041[/tex]

Then, we can calculate the t-statistic as:

[tex]t=\dfrac{M-\mu}{s/\sqrt{n}}=\dfrac{305-300}{2.041}=\dfrac{5}{2.041}=2.45[/tex]

The degrees of freedom for this sample size are:

[tex]df=n-1=4-1=3[/tex]

This test is a two-tailed test, with 3 degrees of freedom and t=2.45, so the P-value for this test is calculated as (using a t-table):

[tex]\text{P-value}=2\cdot P(t>2.45)=0.092[/tex]

As the P-value (0.092) is bigger than the significance level (0.05), the effect is not significant.

The null hypothesis failed to be rejected.

There is not enough evidence to support the claim that the actual temperature of the oven when the dial is at 300 °F does not significantly differ from 300 °F.

If the significance level is 10%, the P-value (0.092) is smaller than the significance level (0.1) and the effect is significant.

The null hypothesis is rejected.

There is enough evidence to support the claim that the actual temperature of the oven when the dial is at 300 °C does not significantly differ from 300 °C.