x² + 3x + k = 0
pls help​

Answer:

i don't know

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

8 kiwis

Step-by-step explanation:

32/16= 2

2 kiwi for $1

4*2= 8

Answer:

8

Step-by-step explanation:

Method 1:

32 kiwi = $16

(÷4)

8 kiwi = $4

(take $16 divided by $4 to find the number of sets of 8 kiwis. hope this helps.)

Ans: 8

Method 2:

$16 ÷ 32 = $0.50 (cost of 1 kiwi)

$4÷$0.50=8

A because the > symbol means greater so if n is on the open side that means its greater

~Shoto Todoroki here~

its option A

i figured this out by trial and error :/

have a good day!

Answer:36

Step-by-step explanation: 3X4 or 3 rectangles plus tow rectanges that = 12

Answer:

In geometry, you will write a line segment using the letters for each of the end points and a line over the top of the letters.

Answer:

Right-triangle

Scalene

Step-by-step explanation:

[] This is a right triangle because it has an angle that is 90°

[] This is a scalene triangle because all of the sides are different lengths

          -> We can also tell this is scalene because none of the angles are the same degree

Have a nice day!

     I hope this is what you are looking for, but if not - comment! I will edit and update my answer accordingly. (ノ^∇^)

- Heather

Answer:

50°

Step-by-step explanation:

∠ RST = (arc QC - arc RT) / 2

          = (150° - 50°) / 2

          = 50°

Answer:

y = 7 - 4x

Step-by-step explanation:

8x + 2y = 14

2y = 14 - 8x (since we're solving for "y", we want "y" by itself)

y = 14-8x / 2 (we want to separate "y" and 2, so we divide the other side of the  equation by 2)

y = 7 - 4x (divide by 2)

Hope this helps :)

Answer:

4/25=0.16=16%

3/11=0.27=27%

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

5 is the answer

please mark as brainlist

thank you

Answer:

  x = 17

Step-by-step explanation:

The hash marks indicate that the segment marked x+2 connects the midpoints of the sides of the triangle. Therefore, it is a "midline" and has half the length of the parallel base.

  x +2 = 1/2(38)

  x = 19 -2 . . . . . subtract 2

  x = 17

Length + width = 1/2 the perimeter:30/2 = 15

Area = length x width

List the factors of 50: 1, 2, 5, 10, 25, 50.

Find the two factors that when added together equal 15:

Dimensions are 5 cm by 10 cm.

See attachments for answer and math work.

Answer:

$4,750

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

3360

Step-by-step explanation:

1600*.11*10= 1600 *.11 = 176 * 10 = 1760 + 1600 = 3360

Answer:

Solving for x

5x - 9 = 3x + 7

subtract 3x from both sides

-3x          -3x

2x - 9 = 7

get rid of constants by adding 9 on both sides since addition is the inverse operation of subtraction

+9      +9

2x = 16

divide by 2 since that is the inverse operation of multiplication

/2    /2

x = 8

The solution for ''x'' for the expression ( 5x – 9 = 3x + 7

Expressions can be evaluated, meaning that they can be simplified to a single value. The value of an expression depends on the values of any variables or numbers within the expression.

To solve for x in equation 5x - 9 = 3x + 7, we want to isolate x on one side of the equation. We can do this by performing the same operation on both sides of the equation, in order to keep the equation balanced.

First, we can simplify both sides of the equation by combining like terms:

5x - 9 = 3x + 7

2x - 9 = 7

Next, we can add 9 to both sides of the equation to isolate the variable term:

2x = 16

Finally, we can divide both sides of the equation by 2 to get the value of x:

x = 8

Therefore, the solution to the equation 5x - 9 = 3x + 7 is x = 8.

To know more about an expression follow

https://brainly.com/question/25968875

#SPJ2

Answer:

  B  (√a*x+√c)^2=0

Step-by-step explanation:

It can be helpful to look a the expanded form of each of these factoring patterns.

  A (ax+√c)^2=0   ⇒   a^2x^2 +2a√c*x +c = 0

  B (√a*x+√c)^2=0   ⇒   ax^2 +2√(ac)*x +c = 0

  C (√a*x+c)(√a*x-c)=0   ⇒   ax^2 -c^2 = 0

  D (ax+√c)(ax-√c)=c   ⇒   a^2x^2 -c = c

If 'a' and 'c' represent the coefficients in the given equation, then choices A, C, and D can be eliminated. The expanded forms of those end up with a^2 and/or c^2 as coefficients, not 'a' and 'c'.

Choice B is the only sensible one, and fits the given equation.

  a = 1, c = 49   ⇒   √a = 1, √c = 7

  x^2 +14x +49 = (x +7)^2 = 0 . . . . . factored using Pattern B

Answer:

-1.3, 8.3

Step-by-step explanation:

Based on the graph below, the solutions are -1.3 and 8.3.

Answer:

X = The number of hours Joey worked (C)

Step-by-step explanation:

$25 is the fee per hour worked. x is the amount of hours worked. added onto this total is another flat $75 fee for the whole visit, making the equation $25 multiplied by the number of hours worked, plus 75.

Answer:

9139.50

Step-by-step explanation:

since it didn't mention any withdraws from the account or any charges, its just a matter of multiplying 7.75 by 18 and adding it to the original balance.

Answer:

9139.50

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

-2x+y=12

Step-by-step explanation:

linear equation

Answer:

Part A:

Gwen has already burned 100 calories when Tristan and Keith started, and he continues to burn 10 calories per minute. The equation for Gwen is

y = 100 + 10x

Part B:

Tristan is burning 125 calories every 10 minutes. His burning calories rate is 12.5 calories per minute. The equation for Tristan is

y = 12.5x

Part C:

Keith is burning 300 calories in 30 minutes. His rate per minute is 10 calories per minute. The equation for Keith is

y = 10x

Part D:

Just follow the instructions and do the thing for the app. You can then answer the questions it is very easy.

Part E:

Do the same for E after you do Part D.

Step-by-step explanation:

Hope it helps!

Answer: ?

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

2^2n = 4n

hope it helps you :)

Answer:

4n

Step-by-step explanation:

2^2n = 4n

hope u liked this answer :)

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

y + y + 1 + y + 2 = 75

3y + 3 = 75

3y = 72

y = 24

y +1 = 25

y + 2 = 26

24 + 25 +26

49 + 26 = 75

Answer: 24, 25, 26

Hi,

x² + 8x + 12 = 0

a= 1 ; b= 8 c= 12

∆ = b² - 4ac

∆ = 8² - 4*1*12

∆ = 64 - 4*12

∆ = 64 - 48

∆ = 16

∆>0 :

x1 = (-b-√∆)/2a = (-8-4)/2 = -12/2 = -6

x2 = (-b+√∆)/2a = (-8+4)/2 = -4/2 = -2

S= { -6 ; -2 }

x = -6

or x = -2

✅(•‿•)

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

x² + 8x + 12 = 0

➺ x² + 2x + 6x = 0

➺ x(x + 2) + 6(x + 2) =0

➺ (x + 6)(x + 2) = 0

Whether, x + 6 = 0

⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀➺ x = -6

⠀⠀or,⠀⠀⠀⠀ x + 2 = 0

⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀➺ x = -2

Answer:

x=10, y=-1

Step-by-step explanation:

x-y=11

2x+y=19

3x=30

x=10

10-y=11

-y=1

y=-1

USED ELIMINATION BC THERE WAS ALREADY A Y AND -Y

Answer:

It is totaly based on the diagram

Answer:

it is said on diagram or other values are given to find it

Answer an essay on nothing

Step-by-step explanation:

In philosophy there is a lot of emphasis on what exists. We call this ontology, which means, the study of being. What is less often examined is what does not exist.

It is understandable that we focus on what exists, as its effects are perhaps more visible. However, gaps or non-existence can also quite clearly have an impact on us in a number of ways. After all, death, often dreaded and feared, is merely the lack of existence in this world (unless you believe in ghosts). We are affected also by living people who are not there, objects that are not in our lives, and knowledge we never grasp.

Upon further contemplation, this seems quite odd and raises many questions. How can things that do not exist have such bearing upon our lives? Does nothing have a type of existence all of its own? And how do we start our inquiry into things we can’t interact with directly because they’re not there? When one opens a box, and exclaims “There is nothing inside it!”, is that different from a real emptiness or nothingness? Why is nothingness such a hard concept for philosophy to conceptualize?

Let us delve into our proposed box, and think inside it a little. When someone opens an empty box, they do not literally find it devoid of any sort of being at all, since there is still air, light, and possibly dust present. So the box is not truly empty. Rather, the word ‘empty’ here is used in conjunction with a prior assumption. Boxes were meant to hold things, not to just exist on their own. Inside they might have a present; an old family relic; a pizza; or maybe even another box. Since boxes have this purpose of containing things ascribed to them, there is always an expectation there will be something in a box. Therefore, this situation of nothingness arises from our expectations, or from our being accustomed. The same is true of statements such as “There is no one on this chair.” But if someone said, “There is no one on this blender”, they might get some odd looks. This is because a chair is understood as something that holds people, whereas a blender most likely not.

The same effect of expectation and corresponding absence arises with death. We do not often mourn people we only might have met; but we do mourn those we have known. This pain stems from expecting a presence and having none. Even people who have not experienced the presence of someone themselves can still feel their absence due to an expectation being confounded. Children who lose one or both of their parents early in life often feel that lack of being through the influence of the culturally usual idea of a family. Just as we have cultural notions about the box or chair, there is a standard idea of a nuclear family, containing two parents, and an absence can be noted even by those who have never known their parents.

This first type of nothingness I call ‘perceptive nothingness’. This nothingness is a negation of expectation: expecting something and being denied that expectation by reality. It is constructed by the individual human mind, frequently through comparison with a socially constructed concept.

Pure nothingness, on the other hand, does not contain anything at all: no air, no light, no dust. We cannot experience it with our senses, but we can conceive it with the mind. Possibly, this sort of absolute nothing might have existed before our universe sprang into being. Or can something not arise from nothing? In which case, pure nothing can never have existed.

If we can for a moment talk in terms of a place devoid of all being, this would contain nothing in its pure form. But that raises the question, Can a space contain nothing; or, if there is space, is that not a form of existence in itself?

This question brings to mind what’s so baffling about nothing: it cannot exist. If nothing existed, it would be something. So nothing, by definition, is not able to ‘be’.

Is absolute nothing possible, then? Perhaps not. Perhaps for example we need something to define nothing; and if there is something, then there is not absolutely nothing. What’s more, if there were truly nothing, it would be impossible to define it. The world would not be conscious of this nothingness. Only because there is a world filled with Being can we imagine a dull and empty one. Nothingness arises from Somethingness, then: without being to compare it to, nothingness has no existence. Once again, pure nothingness has shown itself to be negation.

Answer:

-x=16

x=-16

Step-by-step explanation:

That is the Answer