A 12cmx2cm rectangle sits inside a circle with a radius of 8cm. What isnthe area of the shaded region of the circle

Answer:

x = 6

Step-by-step explanation:

x + 6 = x + x

Combine like terms

x+6 =2x

Subtract x from each side

x+6-x = 2x-x

6 = x

Answer:

51 = 5x+1

x = 10

Step-by-step explanation:

The angles are vertical angles which means they are equal

51 = 5x+1

Subtract 1 from each side

51-1 = 5x+1-1

50 = 5x

Divide each side by 5

50/5 = 5x/5

10 =x

Answer:

10

Step-by-step explanation:

51 = 5x + 1

5x = 51 - 1

5x = 50

x = 10

Hope this helps!

Answer:

It might be 1/3 but I'm not 100% sure

The required scale factor  of ABC to DEF is 1/3.

Scale factor of ABC to DEF to determine.

The scale factor is defined as the ratio of modified change in length to

Here, Triangle ABC is similar to triangle DEF. So, the ratio of the same sides describe the scale factor.
Scale factor = EF/BC
                   = 7/21
                   = 1/3

Thus, the required scale factor  of ABC to DEF is 1/3.

Learn more about Scale factor Here:
https://brainly.com/question/22312172

#SPJ5

Answer:

g-7

Step-by-step explanation:

Multiply the numbers

g-(1*7)

g-7

Answer:

5

Step-by-step explanation:

We know that g is an invertible function and so it must also be a one-to-one function.

This means that each input is paired with exactly one output and that each output is paired with exactly one input.

We know that g(a)=7g and g(5)=7. If the output of 7 is to be paired with exactly one input, then a must be equal to 5.

Answer:

Options (C) and (F)

Step-by-step explanation:

Polynomial function is,

f(x) = x³ - x² - 5x - 3

Possible rational roots of the given function will be = [tex]\frac{\pm1, \pm3}{\pm1}[/tex]

By putting x = -1

f(-1) = (-1)³ - (-1)² -5(-1) - 3

     = -1 - 1 + 5 - 3

     = 0

Therefore, x = -1 will a root of the given function.

Now we apply synthetic division to get the other roots,

-1 |  1       -1       -5      -3

      ↓      -1         2      3

     1       -2       -3      0

Therefore, factored form of the polynomial will be (x + 1)(x² - 2x - 3).

Now we will find the roots of (x² -2x - 3).

x² - 2x - 3 = x² - 3x + x - 3

                = x(x - 3) + 1(x - 3)

                = (x + 1)(x - 3)

For roots of the function, f(x) = 0

(x + 1)(x - 3) = 0

x = -1, 3

Therefore, roots of the function are x = -1, 3

Options (C) and (F) are the answers.

Answer:

y = -2x - 10

Step-by-step explanation:

1. rearrange to find the gradient.

the gradient of the original equation is 1/2 hence why a line PERPENDICULAR to that equation would have a gradient of -2.

2. substitute into y - y1 = m (x - x1)

y - (-2) = -2 (x - (-4))

y = -2x - 10

Answer:

10.03% probability of getting a cup weighing more than 8.64oz

Step-by-step explanation:

Problems of normally distributed samples are solved using the z-score formula.

In a set with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]\sigma[/tex], the zscore of a measure X is given by:

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

The Z-score measures how many standard deviations the measure is from the mean. After finding the Z-score, we look at the z-score table and find the p-value associated with this z-score. This p-value is the probability that the value of the measure is smaller than X, that is, the percentile of X. Subtracting 1 by the pvalue, we get the probability that the value of the measure is greater than X.

In this question, we have that:

[tex]\mu = 8, \sigma = 0.5[/tex]

What is the probability of getting a cup weighing more than 8.64oz

This is the 1 subtracted by the pvalue of Z when X = 8.64. So

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

[tex]Z = \frac{8.64 - 8}{0.5}[/tex]

[tex]Z = 1.28[/tex]

[tex]Z = 1.28[/tex] has a pvalue of 0.8997

1 - 0.8997 = 0.1003

10.03% probability of getting a cup weighing more than 8.64oz

Answer:

they played the pivotal role

Answer:

acute and scalene

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:no entiendo esta en ingles

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Answer is B

Step-by-step explanation:

This is because you can combine both the green tiles. With the other options, you can't combine them.

(also I did the test )

Answer:

The answer is in ur head lololol

Step-by-step explanation:

Its b

Answer:

isosceles triangle

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

5

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Random variable: for this case represent the number of complaints in 2007

Population parameter: represent the real proportion of complaints in 2007 p

Hypothesis to verify

We want to check if the true proportion of complaints in 2007 is equal to 0.23, the system of hypothesis are.:  

Null hypothesis:[tex]p=0.23[/tex]  

Alternative hypothesis:[tex]p \neq 0.23[/tex]  

Step-by-step explanation:

Information provided

n=1432 represent the random sample taken

X=321 represent the number of complaints

[tex]\hat p=\frac{321}{1432}=0.224[/tex] estimated proportion of complaints in 2007

[tex]p_o=0.23[/tex] is the value to verify

z would represent the statistic

Random variable: for this case represent the number of complaints in 2007

Population parameter: represent the real proportion of complaints in 2007 p

Hypothesis to verify

We want to check if the true proportion of complaints in 2007 is equal to 0.23, the system of hypothesis are.:  

Null hypothesis:[tex]p=0.23[/tex]  

Alternative hypothesis:[tex]p \neq 0.23[/tex]  

Answer:

0

Step-by-step explanation:

No one is there which satisfies the condition

Answer:

0 or 0/9 of the club members

Step-by-step explanation:

The only part of the data of members that have logged more than 1 1/5 but less than 1 3/5 hours is the members that logged 1 2/5 hours. There are no members that have logged 1 2/5 hours so our answer is 0 or 0/9.

Answer:

C) The auditor may or may not achieve the desired risk of assessing control risk too low.

Step-by-step explanation:

In a concept of risk sampling, if the sample size is chosen randomly in accordance with random selection procedures, the auditor may or may not achieve the desired risk of assessing risk too low. In other words the auditor may or may not achieve desired precision. This is because a samole chosen randomly may not represent the true population.

This depends largely on the sample size. If the sample size selected is too small, the allowance for sampling risk will be larger than what is required because it will lead to a large standard error of the mean

Answer:

5(4) + 5(8)

Step-by-step explanation:

Through destributive property, 5 is multiplied by both 4 and 8

Answer:

the person above is right thank and five star them

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

r = - [tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

The common ratio r is the ratio between consecutive terms in the sequence.

r = [tex]\frac{48}{-96}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{-24}{48}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{12}{-24}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{-6}{12}[/tex] = - [tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex]

Answer:

-1/2 or b on edge

Step-by-step explanation:

a) The percentage of women meeting the height requirement is approximately 99.99%.

b) The percentage of men meeting the height requirement is approximately 99.95%.

c) The new height requirements are at least 58.5 inches and at most 71.8 inches.

a) To find the percentage of women meeting the height requirement of being between 4ft 9in (57 inches) and 6ft 4in (76 inches), we need to calculate the proportion of women within this range using the normal distribution.

First, we standardize the height requirement using the formula:

Z = (X - μ) / σ

where X is the value (height), μ is the mean, and σ is the standard deviation.

For the lower limit (57 inches):

Z_lower = (57 - 63.3) / 2.7 ≈ -2.33

For the upper limit (76 inches):

Z_upper = (76 - 63.3) / 2.7 ≈ 4.70

Using a standard normal distribution table or calculator, we can find the area between -2.33 and 4.70. This represents the percentage of women meeting the height requirement.

The percentage of women meeting the height requirement is approximately 99.99%.

b) Similarly, for men meeting the height requirement of being between 4ft 9in (57 inches) and 6ft 4in (76 inches), we standardize the values:

For the lower limit (57 inches):

Z_lower = (57 - 67.3) / 2.8 ≈ -3.68

For the upper limit (76 inches):

Z_upper = (76 - 67.3) / 2.8 ≈ 3.11

Using the standard normal distribution table or calculator, we find the area between -3.68 and 3.11.

The percentage of men meeting the height requirement is approximately 99.95%.

c) To find the new height requirements that exclude the tallest 5% of men and the shortest 5% of women, we need to determine the corresponding Z-scores.

For men:

Z_upper_men = Z(0.95) ≈ 1.645

For women:

Z_lower_women = Z(0.05) ≈ -1.645

Using these Z-scores, we can calculate the new height requirements:

For the new lower limit:

X_lower = Z_lower_women * σ + μ

For the new upper limit:

X_upper = Z_upper_men * σ + μ

Substituting the values:

X_lower = -1.645 * 2.7 + 63.3 ≈ 58.53 inches

X_upper = 1.645 * 2.8 + 67.3 ≈ 71.78 inches

Therefore, the new height requirements are at least 58.5 inches and at most 71.8 inches.

For more such question on percentage visit:

https://brainly.com/question/24877689

#SPJ8

a) The percentage of women meeting the height requirement is 99.99%.

b) The percentage of men meeting the height requirement is 99.95%.

c) The new height requirements are at least 58.5 inches and at most 71.8 inches.

a) For women meeting the height requirement:

Given: Mean (μ) = 63.3 in.

Standard Deviation (σ) = 2.7 in.

So, Minimum height requirement:

= 4 ft 9 in

= 4 * 12 + 9

= 57 inches

and, Maximum height requirement:

= 6 ft 4 in

= 6 * 12 + 4

= 76 inches

We will calculate the Z-scores for these heights using the formula:

Z = (x - μ) / σ

For the minimum height requirement:

[tex]Z_{min[/tex] = (57 - 63.3) / 2.7 ≈ -2.33

For the maximum height requirement:

[tex]Z_{max[/tex] = (76 - 63.3) / 2.7 ≈ 4.70

So, the the area between -2.33 and 4.70.

Thus, the percentage is  99.99%.

b) For men meeting the height requirement:

Given: Mean (μ) = 67.3 in., Standard Deviation (σ) = 2.8 in.

Minimum height requirement: 4 ft 9 in = 57 inches

Maximum height requirement: 6 ft 4 in = 76 inches

For the minimum height requirement:

[tex]Z_{min[/tex]= (57 - 67.3) / 2.8 ≈ -3.68

For the maximum height requirement:

[tex]Z_{max[/tex] = (76 - 67.3) / 2.8 ≈ 3.11

So, the area between -3.68 and 3.11.

Thus, the percentage is 99.95%.

c) For the new height requirements:

For men:

[tex]Z_{upper_{men[/tex] = Z(0.95) ≈ 1.645

For women:

[tex]Z_{lower_{women[/tex] = Z(0.05) ≈ -1.645

For the new lower limit:

[tex]X_{lower} = Z_{lower}_{women} \sigma+ \mu[/tex]

For the new upper limit:

[tex]X_{upper} = Z_{upper}_{men} \sigma+ \mu[/tex]

Substituting the values:

[tex]X_{lower} = -1.645 * 2.7 + 63.3[/tex]

           = 58.53 inches

and, [tex]X_{upper} = 1.645 * 2.8 + 67.3[/tex]

                     = 71.78 inches

Therefore, the new height at least 58.5 inches and at most 71.8 inches.

Learn more about z score here:

https://brainly.com/question/31871890

#SPJ6

Answer:

[tex]f = \frac{1}{ {d}^{2} } [/tex]

Answer:

a) 6

b) 10

Step-by-step explanation:

a) The area of a rhombus is half the product of the diagonals, meaning that the area of the shaded part is 4*3/2=6 square meters.

b) To find the area of the white background, you need to find the area of the full rectangle, and then to find the area of both rhombii. The area of the black rhombus is 2*4/2=4 square meters. The area of the full rectangle is 4*5=20 units. Subtracting the areas of the two rhombii, you get an area for the white background of 20-6-4=10 square meters. Hope this helps!

Answer:

22b+24

Step-by-step explanation:

If a box lunch costs b and a bag of chips is $2 extra then we would have:

box lunch = b dollars

box lunch with bag of chips = b + 2 dollars

Now, we need to find the expression for the cost of 12 lunches with chips and 10 lunches without chips, this would be:

12 lunches with chips = 12 (b + 2)

10 lunches without chips = 10b

Let's sum up and simplify these two expressions:

[tex]12(b+2)+10b\\12b+24+10b\\22b+24[/tex]

Thus, the cost of 12 lunches with chips and 10 lunches without chips is 22b+24

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

For the null hypothesis,

H0 : p = 0.63

For the alternative hypothesis,

Ha : p < 0.63

This is a left tailed test

Considering the population proportion, probability of success, p = 0.63

q = probability of failure = 1 - p

q = 1 - 0.63 = 0.37

Considering the sample,

Sample proportion, P = x/n

Where

x = number of success = 478

n = number of samples = 800

P = 478/800 = 0.6

We would determine the test statistic which is the z score

z = (P - p)/√pq/n

z = (0.6 - 0.63)/√(0.63 × 0.37)/800 = - 1.76

From the normal distribution table, the area below the test z score in the left tail 0.039

Thus

p = 0.039

Answer:

-3.66

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:-2

Step-by-step explanation:

Ok so I’m assuming the x stands for the multiplication sign

7/2-4.5*3+8

Use pemdas

Multiplication first

7/2-4.5*3+8

-4.5*3

7/2-13.5+8

Then addition

-13.5+8

Lastly subtraction

7/2-5

-2

Answer:

x=55,y=14

Step-by-step explanation:

<M = <{opposite angles of a parallelogram are congruent and equal}

Hence 3x-55 = 2x=>3x-2x= 55 =>x=55

Simarly;

M+N=180°{ sum of angles in a parallelogram is 180°}

N= 180°-M=>N=180-(3x-55)=180-(3x55-55)= 180- 110=70°

N=70°=>5y=70=>y=70/5=14

therefore x=55,y=14

Answer:

55 and 14

Step-by-step explanation:

i just took the test

Answer:

  A.  G(x) = (x -3)^3 -(x -3)

Step-by-step explanation:

The graph before it was shifted left will be a right-shift of the equation shown. That is accomplished by replacing x with (x-1.5). Then the right-shifted equation is ...

  G(x) = ((x-1.5) -1.5)^3 -((x -1.5) -1.5)

  G(x) = (x -3)^3 -(x -3) . . . . matches choice A

Answer:

A.

Step-by-step explanation:

Volume of sphere = (4/3)πr³

= 4/3(3.14)(d/2)³

= 4/3(3.14)(7/2)³

= 4/3(3.14)(3.5)³

= 4/3(3.14)(42.875)

= (1.33)(3.14)(42.875)

= 179.5 cm³

Answer:

The answer is 179.5 cm^2

Answer:

260 stickers

Step-by-step explanation:

Let Gareth's stickers be x.

Hence Cheryl sticker is 160+x;

If Cheryl gave 185 stickers

to Gareth, it means:

Cheryl has at the moment;

160 + x - 185 = x - 25

At this time when Gareth receives 185 he now has:

x+ 185

Also when he receives x +185, he has 3 times Cherry's meaning:

x+185 =3(x-25)

x + 185 = 3x -75

185 + 75 = 3x-2x

260= x

x = 260.

Hence Gareth has 260 stickers

Answer:

B. No the ordered pair does not satisfy the equation

Step-by-step explanation:

y = -9x - 2

Substitute the point in and see if it is true

-37 = -9(4) -2

-37 = -36 -2

-37 = -38

This is not true so the point is not a solution