a measure of the average value of a random variable is called a(n) group of answer choices variance. standard deviation. expected value. coefficient of variation.

To test the mean difference between the prices of the two models, we can use a level of significance such as 95% or 99%.

This means that we are confident that the result we obtain is accurate at least 95% or 99% of the time.

We can use a t-test to determine whether the difference in means is statistically significant or due to chance.

This test will help us determine whether the price differential between the two models is meaningful or not.

It's important to note that the manufacturer's suggested retail prices are only a suggestion, and actual prices may vary depending on factors such as location, demand, and competition.

learn more about mean here:brainly.com/question/31101410

#SPJ11

The correct pairing of possible null and alternative hypotheses for this experiment is option B.

The null hypothesis states that there is no difference in arthritis issues reported by Groups A and B, while the alternative hypothesis states that Group A reports fewer arthritis issues than Group B.

It is important to note that the null hypothesis assumes that there is no effect of the medication on arthritis issues, and any observed difference between the two groups is due to chance.

The alternative hypothesis, on the other hand, assumes that the medication has an effect on reducing arthritis issues. This experiment is a randomized controlled trial, where participants are randomly assigned to either the treatment group (Group A) or the control group (Group B).

The purpose of this experiment is to determine whether the medication has an effect on reducing arthritis issues compared to a placebo.

By dividing the participants into two groups, the researcher can compare the outcomes between the two groups and draw conclusions about the effectiveness of the medication.

In summary, the correct pairing of possible null and alternative hypotheses for this experiment is option B, and this experiment is a randomized controlled trial to study the effects of a new arthritis medication that divides participants into two groups: Group A gets the drug, and Group B gets a placebo.

The null hypothesis assumes there is no difference between the two groups, while the alternative hypothesis proposes that the medication has a significant effect on arthritis issues in Group A compared to Group B.

To know more about experiment click here

brainly.com/question/17747213

#SPJ11

To find the maximum difference in the lengths of the radii, we need to use the formula for the area of a circle, which is $A=\pi r^2$.

We are given that the sum of the radii is $r+r=10$, which means that each radius has a length of $r=5$.
Let's call the larger circle with radius $5+x$, where $x$ is the difference in the lengths of the radii. The area of this circle is $A_1=\pi(5+x)^2=\pi(25+10x+x^2)$.
Similarly, we can call the smaller circle with radius $5-x$. The area of this circle is $A_2=\pi(5-x)^2=\pi(25-10x+x^2)$.
The difference in the areas of the two circles is:
$A_1-A_2=\pi(25+10x+x^2)-\pi(25-10x+x^2)$
Simplifying this expression, we get:
$A_1-A_2=20\pi x$
We want the difference in the areas to be less than or equal to $5\pi$, so we set up the inequality:
$20\pi x \leq 5\pi$
Dividing both sides by $20\pi$, we get:
$x \leq \frac{1}{4}$
Therefore, the maximum difference in the lengths of the radii is $\boxed{\frac{1}{4}}$.

Involving two circles, radius $r$, and finding the maximum difference in the lengths of their radii.
Given that the sum of the radii is $10$, we can express the radii of the two circles as $r_1$ and $r_2$, such that $r_1 + r_2 = 10$. We want to find the maximum difference in their lengths, subject to the constraint that the difference in their areas is less than or equal to $5\pi$.
The area of a circle is given by $A = \pi r^2$. So, the difference in the areas of the two circles is $|\pi r_1^2 - \pi r_2^2|$. We want this difference to be less than or equal to $5\pi$, which can be expressed as:
$|\pi r_1^2 - \pi r_2^2| \le 5\pi$.
Now, we can divide both sides of the inequality by $\pi$ to simplify:
$|r_1^2 - r_2^2| \le 5$.
Notice that $(r_1 - r_2)(r_1 + r_2)$ is equal to $r_1^2 - r_2^2$. Since we know that $r_1 + r_2 = 10$, we can substitute this value into the equation:
$|10(r_1 - r_2)| \le 5$.
Next, divide both sides by 10:
$|r_1 - r_2| \le \frac{1}{2}$.
Therefore, the maximum difference in the lengths of the radii for the two circles, given the constraint on the difference in their areas, is $\frac{1}{2}$.

Visit here to learn more about area of a circle:

brainly.com/question/28642423

#SPJ11

Answer:

x = 16

Step-by-step explanation:

to solve for x, you need to isolate x on one side of the equation and move everything else to the other side. You can do this by using inverse operations, such as subtraction, addition, multiplication, and division. Here are the steps to follow:

So the value of x is 16.

The professional which is responsible for the organization's overall financial health is (c) chief financial officer.

The "Chief-Financial-Officer" (CFO) is a senior executive in an organization who is responsible for overseeing the financial activities of the company.

The CFO reports to board of directors and is responsible for managing the company's financial actions, including financial planning, budgeting, accounting, and reporting.

The CFO's main responsibility is to ensure the overall financial-health of the company, which involves developing and implementing financial strategies.

The CFO is also responsible for managing the company's cash flow and working capital.

Therefore, the correct option is (c).

Learn more about CFO here

https://brainly.com/question/30639658

#SPJ1

The given question is incomplete, the complete question is

Which term is defined as a professional that is responsible for the overall financial health of an organization or business?

(a) financial analyst

(b) financial planner

(c) chief financial officer

(d) financial accountant

The expected frequencies of the M, MN, and N blood types are then:

The frequency of the M blood type is f(AA) = 0.632.

The frequency of the MN blood type is f(Aa) = 0.304.

The frequency of the N blood type is f(aa) = 0.064.

What is the frequency?

The number of periods or cycles per second is called frequency. The SI unit for frequency is the hertz (Hz). One hertz is the same as one cycle per second.

We can use the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium to calculate the expected frequencies of the M, MN, and N blood types in the population of Eskimos on the Arctic island.

The Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium is a principle that states that the frequencies of alleles and genotypes in a population remain constant from generation to generation in the absence of evolutionary factors (mutation, migration, genetic drift, selection).

Let p be the frequency of the LM allele, and q be the frequency of the LN allele in the population. Since there are only two alleles, p + q = 1.

The frequency of the MM genotype is p², the frequency of the MN genotype is 2pq, and the frequency of the NN genotype is q².

The frequencies of the M, MN, and N blood types can be calculated from the frequencies of the genotypes:

The frequency of the M blood type is p².

The frequency of the MN blood type is 2pq.

The frequency of the N blood type is q².

Given that the frequency of the LM allele is 0.80, we have p = 0.80 and q = 0.20.

If random mating occurs, the expected frequencies of the M, MN, and N blood types are:

The frequency of the M blood type is p² = (0.80)² = 0.64.

The frequency of the MN blood type is 2pq = 2 x 0.80 x 0.20 = 0.32.

The frequency of the N blood type is q² = (0.20)² = 0.04.

If the inbreeding coefficient for this population is 0.05, we can use the following equation to calculate the expected frequencies of the genotypes:

f(AA) = (1 - F) p² + F p,

f(Aa) = (1 - F) 2pq,

f(aa) = (1 - F) q² + F q,

where F is the inbreeding coefficient.

Substituting p = 0.80, q = 0.20, and F = 0.05, we obtain:

The frequency of the MM genotype is f(AA) = (1 - 0.05) (0.80)² + 0.05 x 0.80 = 0.632.

The frequency of the MN genotype is f(Aa) = (1 - 0.05) 2 x 0.80 x 0.20 = 0.304.

The frequency of the NN genotype is f(aa) = (1 - 0.05) (0.20)² + 0.05 x 0.20 = 0.064.

Hence, The expected frequencies of the M, MN, and N blood types are then:

The frequency of the M blood type is f(AA) = 0.632.

The frequency of the MN blood type is f(Aa) = 0.304.

The frequency of the N blood type is f(aa) = 0.064.

To know more about the frequency visit:

https://brainly.com/question/5102661

#SPJ4

The probability of selecting a yellow or red Skittle from the bag is 2/5 or 40%.

To find the probability of selecting a yellow or red Skittle from the bag, we need to first find the total number of yellow and red Skittles, and then divide by the total number of Skittles in the bag.

The bag has a total of 4 + 2 + 6 + 3 + 5 = 20 Skittles.

The number of yellow and red Skittles is 2 + 6 = 8.

Therefore, the probability of selecting a yellow or red Skittle is:

8/20

To reduce the fraction, we can divide the numerator and denominator by their greatest common factor, which is 4:

8/20 ÷ 4/4 = 2/5

To learn more about probability click on,

https://brainly.com/question/23765146

#SPJ1

Based on the given information, we can conclude that the spaced schedule for giving rest is more effective in reducing errors compared to the massed schedule.

This is supported by the mean of 26 errors in the spaced schedule, which is lower than the mean of 36 errors in the massed schedule. Additionally, the obtained F value of 4.21 is greater than the critical F value at the 0.05 level of significance, indicating that there is a significant difference between the two schedules. Therefore, we reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternative hypothesis that the spaced schedule is more effective in reducing errors.

Based on the given information, you conducted a study comparing two rest schedules: massed schedule and spaced schedule. You obtained the following results:

- Spaced schedule: 20 observations, mean of 26 errors
- Massed schedule: 14 observations, mean of 36 errors

You performed an F-test with an alpha level of 0.05 and obtained an F-value of 4.21. To determine the appropriate conclusion, you would need to compare the F-value with the critical F-value for the given degrees of freedom and alpha level. Unfortunately, the critical F-value is not provided in your question.

However, if your obtained F-value (4.21) is greater than the critical F-value at α = 0.05, then you would reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is a significant difference between the massed and spaced rest schedules in terms of the number of errors made. If the obtained F-value is smaller than the critical F-value, then you would fail to reject the null hypothesis and not conclude a significant difference between the two schedules.

Please check the critical F-value for your specific test and degrees of freedom, and compare it to your obtained F-value (4.21) to draw an appropriate conclusion.

Visit here to learn more about mean brainly.com/question/31101410

#SPJ11

The z-score for x = 30.2 is approximately -0.49.

What is z-score measures?

The z-score, also known as the standard score, is a measure used in statistics to quantify the number of standard deviations that a given data point is from the mean of a dataset.

To calculate the z-score for x = 30.2, we use the formula:

z = (x - μ) / σ

where x is the observed value, μ is the population mean, and σ is the population standard deviation. In this case, we are given the sample mean and sample standard deviation, so we will use them as estimates for the population parameters.

Substituting the given values, we have:

z = (30.2 - 33.7) / 7.2

Simplifying, we get:

z = -0.49

Rounding to two decimal places, we have:

z ≈ -0.49

Therefore, the z-score for x = 30.2 is approximately -0.49.

To know more about z-score measures visit:

brainly.com/question/30792829

#SPJ4

The sample size used to obtain the 95% confidence interval for the proportion of first-year students at a school who played in intramural sports is approximately 360.

To find the sample size, n, we need to use the formula:

n = (z^2 * p * q) / E^2

Where:
z = the z-score corresponding to the desired confidence level (in this case, it is 1.96 for a 95% confidence level)
p = the proportion of first-year students who played in intramural sports (given as 0.68)
q = the complement of p (q = 1 - p)
E = the margin of error (given as 0.04)

Substituting the given values into the formula, we get:

n = (1.96^2 * 0.68 * 0.32) / 0.04^2
n = 360.15

Therefore, the sample size used to obtain the 95% confidence interval for the proportion of first-year students at a school who played in intramural sports is approximately 360.

Visit here to learn more about  sample size : https://brainly.com/question/30885988
#SPJ11

Answer:

31 and 4 ninths square yards.

Step-by-step explanation:

The surface area of a right rectangular prism is the amount of wrapping paper you need to cover it up. To find it, you need to measure the length, width, and height of the prism. Then you can use this magic spell:

Surface area = 2 (lw + wh + lh) square units

where l is the length, w is the width, and h is the height.

For example, you have a right rectangular prism with length 3 yards, width 1 and 1 third yard, and height 2 and 2 thirds yards. That's a big gift! Using the magic spell, we get:

Surface area = 2 ((3 x 1 1/3) + (1 1/3 x 2 2/3) + (3 x 2 2/3)) yd² Surface area = 2 ((4 + 3 7/9 + 8)) yd² Surface area = 2 (15 7/9) yd² Surface area = 31 4/9 yd²

So the surface area of the right rectangular prism is 31 and 4 ninths square yards. That's a lot of wrapping paper! I hope you have enough tape!

it is not possible for a continuous function to be concave up and always negative.

To see why, note that a concave up function is one whose second derivative is positive. So we need to find a function whose second derivative is positive and is always negative.

However, if a function is always negative, then its values are always less than or equal to zero. This means that its second derivative must be non-positive, since the second derivative measures the rate at which the function's slope is changing.

Now suppose that we have a function f(x) that is concave up and always negative. Since f(x) is always negative, we have f(x) < 0 for all x. But since f(x) is concave up, its second derivative f''(x) is positive. This means that f(x) is increasing, and in particular, as x goes to infinity, f(x) must approach a limit. But since f(x) is always negative, its limit as x goes to infinity must be nonpositive. This is a contradiction, since a concave up function that is always negative cannot have a nonpositive limit at infinity.

Therefore, it is not possible for a continuous function to be concave up and always negative.

To know more about function check the below link:

https://brainly.com/question/25638609

#SPJ4

Yes, if the geometric multiplicity of each eigenvalue equals its algebraic multiplicity, then the matrix is diagonalizable.

1. Eigenvalues: Scalar values associated with a matrix that, when multiplied by a non-zero vector (eigenvector), only result in a scaled version of that vector.

2. Geometric multiplicity: The number of linearly independent eigenvectors associated with a specific eigenvalue.

3. Algebraic multiplicity: The number of times a specific eigenvalue appears as a root of the characteristic polynomial of the matrix.

4. Matrix diagonalizable: A matrix is diagonalizable if it can be transformed into a diagonal matrix through a similarity transformation (using an invertible matrix P).


A matrix is diagonalizable if and only if there are enough linearly independent eigenvectors to form a basis for the matrix's domain. This means that the sum of the geometric multiplicities of all eigenvalues must equal the dimension of the matrix. If the geometric multiplicity of each eigenvalue equals its algebraic multiplicity, it ensures that there are enough linearly independent eigenvectors to form a basis. Consequently, the matrix is diagonalizable.

Learn more about geometric multiplicity here:

brainly.com/question/29995644

#SPJ11

If the explanatory variables explained more than 20% of the variation in the response variables, it would mean that the coefficient of determination is above 0.2.

The coefficient of determination, also known as R-squared, is a statistical measure that represents the proportion of the variation in the dependent variable that is explained by the independent variables in a regression model. It ranges from 0 to 1, with 1 indicating that all the variation in the dependent variable is explained by the independent variables and 0 indicating that none of the variation is explained.

Therefore, if the explanatory variables explain more than 20% of the variation in the response variables, it means that the coefficient of determination is greater than 0.2. This is a good indicator that the regression model is a good fit for the data and that the independent variables are significant predictors of the dependent variable.

It is important to note that the question does not mention anything about there being two response variables or two explanatory variables. Therefore, we cannot conclude anything about the number of variables based on the given information.

However, we can conclude that the explanatory variables are significant in explaining the variation in the response variable.

To know more about variable click here

brainly.com/question/2466865

#SPJ11

A statistical technique called the chi-square test is used to compare actual outcomes with predictions. The goal of this test is to establish whether a discrepancy between observed and expected data is the result of chance or a correlation between the variables you are researching.

T tests and chi-square tests can both evaluate differences between two groups. However, a t test is utilised when there are two groups in a categorical variable and a dependent quantitative variable. In cases where there are two categorical variables, a chi-square test of independence is applied.A statistical technique called the chi-square test is used to compare actual outcomes to predictions.

Typically, it involves a contrast between two sets of statistical data. Karl Pearson developed this test in 1900 for the analysis and distribution of categorical data. As a result, Pearson's chi-squared test was cited.

To know more about ANNOVA, visit

https://brainly.com/question/29988563

#SPJ4

The correct option (with regard to the surface area) is D. 96

Front and back (triangles

There are two triangles (right angle).

They are found by multiplying the 2 legs together.

Area = 1/2 * b * h

b = 4

h = 3

Area = 1/2 * 4 * 3

Area = 6

But there are 2 of them so the Area =                          12

Left face (slanted.

The hypotenuse of the right triangle is 5

a² + b² = c²

a = 3

b = 4

c = ?

3² + 4² = c²

9 + 16 = c²

c^2 = 25

√(c²) = √(25)

c = 5

The front face is 5* 7 =                                 35

Left side

w = 3

L = 7

Area 3 * 7 =                                                   21

Bottom

L = 7

w = 4

Area = L * W

Area = 7 * 4                                                  28

Total                                                              96

Learn more about surface area at:

https://brainly.com/question/29298005

#SPJ4

Full Question:

Although part of your question is missing, you might be referring to this full question:

See the attached image.

The expected increase in the value of the house is approximately $39.6 thousand dollars.

The expected increase in the value of the house, resulting from adding a new bathroom and increasing the size of the house by 101 square feet, is approximately $39.6 thousand dollars.

This estimate is based on the given regression equation, where the coefficient for the number of bathrooms is 23.6 and the coefficient for the house size is 0.158. These coefficients indicate the expected change in the selling price associated with a one-unit increase in the respective variable.

Therefore, by multiplying the coefficient for bathrooms by the increase in bathrooms (23.6 * 1) and the coefficient for house size by the increase in size (0.158 * 101), we can estimate the expected increase in the value of the house.

To calculate the expected increase, we need to consider the coefficients associated with the bathroom variable and the house size variable in the regression equation. The coefficient for bathrooms is 23.6, indicating that for every additional bathroom, the selling price is expected to increase by $23.6 thousand. In this case, the homeowner added one bathroom, so the expected increase due to the additional bathroom is 23.6 * 1 = $23.6 thousand.

Similarly, the coefficient for the house size variable is 0.158, indicating that for every additional square foot of house size, the selling price is expected to increase by $0.158 thousand (or $158). Since the homeowner increased the house size by 101 square feet, the expected increase due to the increase in size is 0.158 * 101 = $15.958 thousand (approximately $15.8 thousand).

To find the total expected increase, we add the expected increases due to the additional bathroom and the increase in house size: $23.6 thousand + $15.8 thousand = $39.6 thousand (approximately). Therefore, the expected increase in the value of the house is approximately $39.6 thousand dollars.

Learn more about Dollars:

brainly.com/question/15169469

#SPJ11

The standard deviation of the sampling distribution of the sample means will be equal to the standard deviation of the population divided by the square root of the sample size. Therefore, if the population standard deviation is 50 and the sample size is 25, then the standard deviation of the sampling distribution of the sample means will be 10.

The Central Limit Theorem (CLT) states that the sampling distribution of the sample means will approach a normal distribution as the sample size increases, regardless of the shape of the population distribution. This means that even if the population distribution is not normal, the distribution of the sample means will still be approximately normal as long as the sample size is sufficiently large (usually, a sample size greater than or equal to 30 is considered large enough).

Additionally, according to the CLT, the mean of the sampling distribution of the sample means will be equal to the mean of the population from which the samples are drawn. In this case, since the population mean is 150, the mean of the sampling distribution of the sample means will also be 150.

for such more question on standard deviation

https://brainly.com/question/475676

#SPJ11

Based on the given situations, the one that can be modeled by an exponential function is:
Daniel's allowance is $1 and his parents will double his allowance for each chore he completes around the house.
An exponential function involves a constant base raised to a variable power.

The situation that can be modeled by an exponential function is:

Daniel's allowance is $1 and his parents will double his allowance for each chore he completes around the house.

We can represent this situation with the following exponential function:

[tex]f(x) = 2^x[/tex]

Where:

x represents the number of chores completed

f(x) represents the corresponding allowance amount

This is an exponential function because the output (allowance amount) is proportional to 2 raised to the power of the input (number of chores completed).

Specifically, each time a chore is completed, the allowance amount is doubled, which corresponds to an exponential growth pattern.

In this case, the base is 2 (since the allowance is doubled) and the variable power represents the number of chores completed.

The equation for this situation would be:
[tex]Allowance = 1 \times  2^x[/tex]
where x is the number of chores completed.

For similar question on exponential function.

https://brainly.com/question/2456547

#SPJ11

Answer:

B-The flare signal was set off at a height of 3 feet.

The probability is 0.6480.

The probability is 0.9629.

1. This can be computed using the standard normal distribution as follows:

z = (70 - 69.0) / 2.8 = 0.357

Using a standard normal table or calculator, we find that P(Z ≤ 0.357) ≈ 0.6480. Therefore, the probability that a male passenger can fit through the doorway without bending is approximately 0.6480.

2. = 2.8/√25 = 0.56 inches.

We want to find P(x < 70), which is the probability that the mean height of the 25 men is less than 70 inches. This can be standardized using the standard normal distribution as follows:

z = (70 - 69.0) / 0.56 = 1.79

Using a standard normal table or calculator, we find that P(Z < 1.79) ≈ 0.9629. Therefore, the probability that the mean height of the 25 men is less than 70 inches is approximately 0.9629.

Read more on probability here:https://brainly.com/question/24756209

#SPJ4

The amount of honey remain left after bears ate 0.2 pounds of honey is equal to 0.5 pounds.

Amount of Honey produced by bee colony is equal to 0.7 pounds

Amount of honey consumed by bears is equal to 0.2 pounds

let 'x' be the amount of honey that remain left after bears consumed some amount of honey.

If a bee colony produced 0.7 pounds of honey, and bears ate 0.2 pounds of it,

Then the amount of honey that remains is represented by an equation,

x  + 0.2pounds = 0.7 pounds

This implies,

⇒ x = 0.7 - 0.2

⇒ x = 0.5 pounds

Therefore, there are 0.5 pounds of honey remaining after the bears ate 0.2 pounds of it.

Learn more about pounds here

brainly.com/question/31314288

#SPJ1

Answer: The situation that is most likely to have a constant rate of change is option B: "The total amount paid for gas compared with the number of gallons purchased."

This is because the price of gas per gallon is usually constant, so the rate of change of the total amount paid for gas should be constant with respect to the number of gallons purchased. In other words, if you plot the total amount paid for gas against the number of gallons purchased, you would expect a straight line with a constant slope.

In contrast, the number of flowers in a flower bed compared with the area planted (option A), the distance a delivery truck travels compared with the number of deliveries made (option C), and points scored in a basketball game compared with the number of quarters played (option D) are less likely to have a constant rate of change because they can be affected by various factors such as weather, traffic, player performance, and so on.

Answer:

B.

Step-by-step explanation:

In robust optimization, a constraint that cannot be violated is known as a hard constraint.

Hard constraints must be satisfied by any feasible solution to the optimization problem, while soft constraints are allowed to be violated, but at a cost. Optional constraints are constraints that can be included or excluded from the problem formulation depending on the specific needs of the application.

On the other hand, optional constraints or soft constraints are those that can be violated to some extent without significantly affecting the overall objective of the optimization problem. Soft constraints are used to express preferences or goals that are desirable but not strictly necessary for the problem to be solved.

for such more question on hard constraint

https://brainly.com/question/27371101

#SPJ11

Polynomial functions and rational functions are both types of functions that are commonly studied in mathematics. However, there are fundamental differences in the graphs of these two types of functions.

A polynomial function is a function of the form f(x) = a_nx^n + a_{n-1}x^{n-1} + ... + a_1x + a_0, where n is a non-negative integer, and the a_i's are coefficients. The graph of a polynomial function is a smooth curve that can have any number of turns, but does not have any breaks or holes.

Polynomial functions can have degree 0 (a constant function), degree 1 (a linear function), degree 2 (a quadratic function), and so on.

On the other hand, a rational function is a function of the form f(x) = p(x)/q(x), where p(x) and q(x) are both polynomial functions. The graph of a rational function can have breaks or holes where the denominator is zero. The degree of the numerator and denominator can be the same, but it is not a requirement.

One fundamental difference in the graphs of polynomial functions and rational functions is that polynomial functions have a defined end behavior, while rational functions do not. The end behavior of a polynomial function depends on the degree and leading coefficient of the function. Rational functions, however, can approach vertical asymptotes as x approaches certain values, making the end behavior undefined.

Another difference is that the domain of a polynomial function is all real numbers, while the domain of a rational function excludes any value of x that makes the denominator zero. This means that the domain of a rational function can have "holes" in the graph where the function is undefined.

In summary, polynomial functions and rational functions are both important types of functions in mathematics, but they have fundamental differences in their graphs. Polynomial functions have a smooth curve and defined end behavior, while rational functions can have breaks and holes in the graph and undefined end behavior.

To know more about linear click here

brainly.com/question/30444906

#SPJ11

The car must achieve an acceleration of 60 mph²) to go from 50mph to 60mph in 1/6 of an hour.

The mean value theorem states that for a differentiable function f(x) on an interval [a,b], there exists a point c in (a,b) such that:

f'(c) = (f(b) - f(a))/(b - a)

In this problem, let f(t) be the speed of the car at time t, where t is measured in hours since 2:00pm. Then we have:

f(0) = 50 (since the speedometer reads 50mph at 2:00pm)

f(1/6) = 60 (since the speedometer reads 60mph at 2:10pm, which is 1/6 of an hour later)

We want to find the acceleration of the car, which is the derivative of the speed function f(t).

Using the mean value theorem, we have:

f'(c) = (f(1/6) - f(0))/(1/6 - 0)

Simplifying this expression, we get:

f'(c) = (60 - 50)/(1/6) = 60

Therefore, the car must achieve an acceleration of 60 miles per hour per hour (or 60 mph²) to go from 50mph to 60mph in 1/6 of an hour.

To learn more about mean value theorem visit:

brainly.com/question/30403137

#SPJ4

The measures of the angles in the completed table of the question can be presented as follows;

Angle AFB [tex]{}[/tex]        [tex]{}[/tex]Angle BFC      Angle DFE   Angle EFA

48          [tex]{}[/tex] [tex]{}[/tex]             42                    48                132

36 [tex]{}[/tex]                       54                    36                144

40[tex]{}[/tex]                        50                    40                140

An angle is a geometric figure formed by the opening (space) at the point where two rays meet.

The specified angle measurement indicates that we get;

Angle AFB and angle BFC are complementary angles

Angle AFB and angle DFE are vertical angles

Vertical angles are congruent

Angle EFA and angle BFD are vertical angles

Angle BFD = Angle BFC + Angle CFD

Therefore;

Angle EFA = Angle BFC + Angle CFD

Angle CFD = 90°

The completed table can be presented as follows;

Angle AFB [tex]{}[/tex]             Angle BFC         Angle DFE              Angle EFA

48 [tex]{}[/tex]                             42                          48                       132

AFB = DFE = 36 [tex]{}[/tex]    BFC=90-36 =54       36                        90 + 54 = 144

90-50 = 40[tex]{}[/tex]      [tex]{}[/tex]      140 - 90 = 50            40                        140

The possible question, obtained from a similar question on the internet can be presented as follows;

The rows in the following table represent a complete set of angle measurement in the attached drawing created with MS Excel

Make use of the drawing and the angle measurements in each row on the table to find the missing (required) angle measurement

Angle AFB [tex]{}[/tex]         Angle BFC             Angle DFE               Angle EFA

48                   [tex]{}[/tex]     42                           48                            132

                                                          36                                

[tex]{}[/tex]                                                                                           140

Learn more on vertical angles here: https://brainly.com/question/4282601

#SPJ1  

The sign that makes the statement as true is minus.

For the statement 1 1/4 [sign] 1/4, we need to determine whether the missing sign should be a plus or a minus. To do this, we need to perform the arithmetic calculation that the sign represents.

If we insert a plus sign between 1 1/4 and 1/4, we would be adding the two fractions together. To add fractions with different denominators, we need to find a common denominator. In this case, the least common multiple of 4 and 14 is 28.

Therefore, we can rewrite the statement as 1 7/28 = 1.25.

This is not true, since 1 1/4 is equal to 1.25, and 1.25 plus 1/4 would be greater than 1 1/2.

On the other hand, if we insert a minus sign between 1 1/4 and 1/4, we would be subtracting the second fraction from the first. We can find a common denominator as before and rewrite the statement as

1 3/28 = 1.1071. This is true, since 1 1/4 minus 1/4 is equal to 1.

Therefore, the sign that makes the statement true is the minus sign.

To know more about sign here

https://brainly.com/question/31810847

#SPJ4

Reducing the sample size from 2,500 to 1,500 people will likely increase the margin of error and decrease the precision of the estimate.

This means that the estimate of the proportion of people who purchase the product online may not be as accurate as it would have been with a larger sample size. Additionally, reducing the sample size may limit the generalizability of the results, as the sample may not be as representative of the larger population of people who purchase the product.

Find out more about sample size

brainly.com/question/20756751

#SPJ11

The answer is that the maximum amount of lead allowed in drinking water is 0.015 mg/kg and the maximum amount of copper allowed is 1.3 mg/kg.

To express these values in parts per million (ppm), we need to convert the mass of the substance to the mass of the water.

To convert mg/kg to ppm, we need to multiply by 1,000,000 (1 million) and divide by the density of the water. The density of water is 1 gram per milliliter (g/mL), which is equivalent to 1,000,000 mg/L.

For lead:
0.015 mg/kg x 1,000,000 / 1,000,000 mg/L = 15 ppb (parts per billion)

For copper:
1.3 mg/kg x 1,000,000 / 1,000,000 mg/L = 1,300 ppb

Therefore, the maximum allowed levels of lead and copper in drinking water are 15 ppb and 1,300 ppb, respectively.
The maximum amounts of lead and copper allowed in drinking water, when expressed in parts per million (ppm), are 15 ppm for lead and 1,300 ppm for copper.

To know more about lead and copper visit:

brainly.com/question/30326000

#SPJ11