At the end of the novel, Scout has started to understand that cruel and hurtful things happen to good people. Thus, the correct option is C.
What is a Novel?A novel may be defined as a developed prose description that is usually lengthy and complicated and negotiates especially with human experience through a usually corresponding series of events.
At the end of the Novel, Scout has learned various concepts and thoughts associated with the betterment of one's life.
Among which one of the important things that Scout analyzed is that cruel and hurtful things happen to good people mostly.
Therefore, it is well described above.
To learn more about Novel, refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/944698
#SPJ1
Elizabeth’s first research question is “How did Theseus overcome the Minotaur?” What should her second research question be, and what would be the most credible source for research?
The second question that would be the most credible source for research is “Which traits show Theseus’s heroism?” using a current article from a scholarly website for research.
What is researching and writing about mythical character?Researching and writing about mythical character is researching about ancient stories and writing thesis about them.
The options are attached:
A:“Which traits show Theseus’s heroism?” using a newspaper article published in 1990 for research.
B:“Which traits show Theseus’s heroism?” using a current article from a scholarly website for research.
C: “How does Theseus’s heroism impact modern life?” using a newspaper article published in 1990 for research.
D: “How does Theseus’s heroism impact modern life?” using a current article from a scholarly website for research.
Thus, the correct option is B.
Learn more about researching and writing about mythical character
https://brainly.com/question/16908403
#SPJ1
Which sentence in this excerpt from a literary analysis essay is most likely the thesis statement
The given question is incomplete as the excerpt is not given. The excerpt should be given below:
'O. Henry's short story "The Gift of Magi" is about a couple who are deeply in love. Della and Jim are poor, but they each want to buy the other a special Christmas present. Because they have no money, they sell their own priced possessions to be able to afford presents for each other. O. Henry uses his short story "The Gift of Magi" to show that poverty cannot affect true love. Despite having no luxuries, Della and Jim are willing to make sacrifices for each other because their love is true.'
The sentence in this excerpt from a literary analysis essay which is most likely the thesis statement is 'O. Henry uses his short story "The Gift of Magi" to show that poverty cannot affect true love.' A thesis statement is typically stated in a single sentence, however it might be repeated elsewhere.
O. Henry illustrates that true love is unaffected by poverty in his short story "The Gift of Magi" because it captures the essence of his point. Della sells her hair so that she may afford a chain for Jim's pocket watch, while Jim sells his lovely pocket watch so that he can buy a brooch for Della's lovely long hair. As a result, their tangible gifts are meaningless, but one has nonetheless shown the other that they are capable of sacrificing their most valued assets for one another, so demonstrating their love for one another. The real gift they both receive from the Magi on that particular Christmas day is this realisation.Therefore, the sentence in this excerpt from a literary analysis essay which is most likely the thesis statement is 'O. Henry uses his short story "The Gift of Magi" to show that poverty cannot affect true love.' An essay's, research paper's, etc. core idea or claim is succinctly summarised in the thesis statement.
Learn more about 'The Gift of Magi' here-
https://brainly.com/question/27914209
#SPJ10
Rewrite the sentences using the underlided adjectives as adverbs
HINT- identify the noun which the adjective is describing. change it to its verb form and replace the existing verb
a) you have done a nice work ( use nicely)
------
b) she gave a graceful performance
------------
c) the teacher gave a patient explaination
----------
d) the coach extended a fair treatment to all players
-----
e) despite the slow walk, the tortoise won the race
-------
Answer:
.a)u have done the work nicely
B) she gave the performance gracefully
C) the teacher gave the explanation peacefully
D) the coach extended the treatment fairly to all the players
E) despite walking slowly the tortoise won the race
Identify the type of subordinate clause in the following and determine if it is a noun, adverb or adjective.
The sauce burned before Hans remembered to stir it.
The type of subordinate clause being addressed by the given sentence is the adverbial clause or adverb subordinate clause.
What is the adverbial clause?The adverbial clause refers to the word group where the dependent clause has modified the verb being used in the independent clause.
According to the given sentence, the adverbial clause always begins with a conjunction, that is, before. The phrase 'sauce burned' is the dependent or subordinate clause consisting of a subject and an adverb, that is, 'burn' which changed the verb 'remember' being used in an independent clause, that is, 'Hans remembered'.
Therefore, the adverbial clause is the type of subordinate clause examined from the given sentence.
Learn more about the adverbial clause in the related link:
https://brainly.com/question/3038785
#SPJ1
Question 4 of 20
Click to read "The Story of Daedalus and Icarus" by Ovid. Then answer the
question.
Who or what does Brueghel leave out in his interpretation, Landscape with the
Fall of Icarus?
A. The sun
B. Icarus
C. Daedalus
D. Other people
Brueghel leave out in his interpretation, Landscape with the
Fall of Icarus is C) Daedalus.
Brueghel left out Daedalus in his interpretation, Landscape with the Fall of Icarus.
Who is Pieter Bruegel?Pieter Bruegel, a famous Dutch painter from the Renaissance, painted in oil in canvass the "Landscape with the Fall of Icarus," probably painted in the 1560s. This is one of his greatest pieces of work, renown all over the world of art. The painting is exhibited in the Royal Museum of Fine Art, located in Brussels, Belgium.
Thus, option "C" is correct.
To learn more about Pieter Bruegel, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/10994651
#SPJ1
"There's Don and Eva," Mrs. Hutchinson yelled. "Make them take their chance!"
"Daughters draw with their husbands' families, Tessie," Mr. Summers said gently. "You know that as well as anyone else."
"It wasn't fair," Tessie said.
"I guess not, Joe," Bill Hutchinson said regretfully. "My daughter draws with her husband's family, that's only fair. And I've got no other family except the kids."
–“The Lottery,”
Shirley Jackson
What kind of tone should be used to express how Tessie Hutchinson feels when she says, “It wasn’t fair”?
puzzled
forgiving
understanding
distressed
The kind of tone that should be used to express how Tessie Hutchinson feels when she says, “It wasn’t fair” is distressed. Thus, the correct option for this question is D.
What is the tone of the excerpt?The tone of the excerpt may be characterized as the mood implied by an author's word choice and the way that the text can make a reader feel. The tone an author uses in a piece of writing can evoke any number of emotions and perspectives.
The tone of the passage or any excerpt is determined by the wording and mood of the author along with the sense of expression. This tone depends on numerous factors like the setting of the play and theme.
Therefore, the kind of tone that should be used to express how Tessie Hutchinson feels when she says, “It wasn’t fair” is distressed. Thus, the correct option for this question is D.
To learn more about Author's tone, refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/15447799
#SPJ1
why does the speaker say it is important for her to offer her daughter choices? how does the speaker compare that to the importance of choice for the animals she cares for?
It can be inferred from the text that the speaker indicates that it is crucial for her offspring to have choices because it is necessary for her to be happy as she develops into an adult.
What is an inference?An inference is a conclusion that is reached after a rational analysis of the facts of the text has been executed.
Thus, it is correct to infer that the speaker indicates that it is crucial for her offspring to have choices because it is necessary for her to be happy as she develops into an adult.
Learn more about inferences at;
https://brainly.com/question/25280941
#SPJ11
The speaker says that it is important because she feels that when she gives choices to her daughter she is happy and can grow as a person .
How does the speaker compare that to the importance of choice for the animals she cares for?She compares it to the importance of choice for the animals by talking about how animals are the same way . When one gives them choices, they will grow to love their carer and live long happy lives .
Therefore, the correct answer is as given above.
learn more about speaker's intention: https://brainly.com/question/7982337
#SPJ9
Which detail from the passages best reveals that Grete believes that Gregor is
too much of a burden on the family?
The textual evidence that reveal that Grete believes that Gregor is too much of a burden on the family is the portion where Gregor reveals himself and the boarders indicate that they'd leave without paying any rent.
What is Textual Evidence?Textual Evidence refers to the portion of a text that buttresses the assertion being referred to.
Thus it is correct to indicate that the evidence from the passage that reveal that Grete believes that Gregor is too much of a burden on the family is the portion where Gregor reveals himself and the boarders indicate that they'd leave without paying any rent.
Learn more about Gregor at:
https://brainly.com/question/12309315
#SPJ1
Select all the correct answers.
Read the third paragraph from the passage.
A common misunderstanding among Americans is about the amount of money NASA receives from the U.S. government. NASA's budget has accounted for 0.5 percent of the total U.S. federal budget. That amounts to roughly $10 of an annual personal income tax going toward the best space program in the world. NASA accounts for 40 times less than what the federal government spends on the Department of Defense. Unfortunately, programs such as Project Constellation, which promised to return American astronauts to the moon, and ExoMars, which was designed to look for evidence of life on Mars and eventually land humans on Mars, have been put on hold due to budget cuts.
The author uses this paragraph to develop which two claims?
All the nations should come together in order to help NASA raise the necessary funds.
Project Constellation and ExoMars have been deferred due to a shortage of funds.
Collaboration with Russia to build the International Space Station resulted in the depletion of funds.
The majority of the federal budget should be spent on NASA, as its work is more important than the Department of Defense.
The U.S. Department of Defense is the strongest in the world, as it uses the funds that should actually be used by NASA.
The amount of money spent on NASA is much less than the amount of money spent on the Department of Defense.
Option (b) and (f)i.e, Project Constellation and ExoMars have been deferred due to a shortage of funds and The amount of money spent on NASA is much less than the amount of money spent on the Department of Defense.
What Is NASA?The National Aeronautics and Space Administration is known as NASA. The United States government's NASA agency is in charge of all air and space-related science and technology. With the Soviet satellite Sputnik's launch in 1957, the Space Age officially began.
On October 1st, 1958, NASA began operations. The organization was established to coordinate American space exploration and aviation research.
According to the study, the federal government spends 40 times less on NASA than on the Department of Defense. As a result, the initial response is correct. The second response is likewise accurate because it was stated clearly in the article. The other options are also illogical because neither Russia nor anybody else ever claimed that NASA or the government of Defense were less significant than one another.
Therefore, option(b)and(f) are the two claims.
To know more about NASA refer to: https://brainly.com/question/20763143
#SPJ10
What type of character contrasts another character and uses to enhace the understanding of the other character?
Answer:
Somkin in baggy shaggy you should join, just smoke sum gonja it comes from da gas grass gods -KRuMpS#*^%$
Explanation:
Write an article on "child labour".
Answer:
brainliest naman po
Explanation:
brainliest please
Keisha will run in the spring 5k race, so she had started a training program next monday.
which correction of the underlined verb phrase fixes the inappropriate shift in tense in this sentence?
started
will have started
will start
has started
Which is the closest synonym for the word "pursue?"
Answer:
chase/track/hunt/follow
But when cities or countries are accustomed to live under a prince, and his family is exterminated, they, being on the one hand accustomed to obey and on the other hand not having the old prince, cannot agree in making one from amongst themselves, and they do not know how to govern themselves. For this reason they are very slow to take up arms, and a prince can gain them to himself and secure them much more easily
What features of the passage identify it as using a cause-and-effect structure? Select three options.
The first sentence lists specific conditions followed by what might eventually happen.
The first sentence uses the expressions “on the one hand” and “on the other hand.”
The second sentence starts with the expression “for this reason.”
The second sentence lists potential consequences of the situation described.
The second sentence describes the citizens of the conquered city.
Answer:
Thr first sentence lists specific conditions followed by what might eventually happen.The second sentence starts with the expression "for this reason."The second sentence lists potential consequences of the situation described.3. According to the psychoanalytic perspective of personality, personality is based on
O A. unconscious experiences while growing up.
B. a combination of unique traits.
O C. genetics.
OD. religious practices.
Answer:
O A. unconscious experiences while growing up.
Explanation:
hope it helps
Which detail from "The Monkey's Paw" is an example of conflict?
Answer:
Herbert White gets caught in a piece of machinery at work and is killed.
Explanation:
A case to break stereotypes on crow (120-150 words)
A case to break stereotypes on Jim crow is racial inequality and division as linked to Jim Crow segregation.
What is the Stereotypes about?Stereotypes is known to be imbibed into USA and it is one that match with the institution of slavery. Note that the expected behaviors of African-Americans are said to be influence as a result of stereotypes done or kept by the status quo.
Therefore, A case to break stereotypes on Jim crow is racial inequality and division as linked to Jim Crow segregation.
Learn more about stereotypes from
https://brainly.com/question/361502
#SPJ12
A case to break stereotypes on Jim crow can be regarded as the case of discrimination and segregation base on race.
What is the Stereotypes ?Stereotype can be regarded as a generalized belief as regards particular category of people, and this can be explained about Jim Crow who was a motherly black woman that work with a white family
And as we know that the Americans have several negative stereotypes , and the case of the Crow and white family portrait this.
Learn more about stereotypes from
brainly.com/question/361502
Please answer! 20 points
Ajmal doesn’t want to argue with you, “yet” he doesn’t want to give in. The correct answer is represented by option C.
In this sentence, we are presented with two opposing points. (1) Ajmal does not want to argue with you, and (2) he does not want to give in. By not giving in, Ajmal would continue to argue with you. Because the two clauses of the sentence represent different views, the word “yet” is used.
The term “so” would be used in a cause and effect situation. This transforms the sentence into the conversion of: Ajmal doesn’t want to argue with you, so he gives in.
Using the word “for” describes a situation where one part of the sentence is being explained by another. This converts the sentence into: Ajmal gives in, for he does not want to argue with you.
The word “and” is used as a way of addition to what’s initially being said, which in this case is that Ajmal does not want to argue. While it would make sense grammatically to insert the term “and” into this sentence, it isn’t relevant because the two clauses contradict each other.
Therefore, option C is correct.
Read the excerpt from Malala Yousafzai's speech at
the United Nations
The terrorists are misusing the name of Islam and
Pashtun society for their own personal benefits.
Pakistan is a peace-loving democratic country.
Pashtuns want education for their daughters and sons.
And Islam is a religion of peace, humanity and
brotherhood. Islam says that it is not only each child's
right to get education, rather it is their duty and
responsibility.
Mark this and return
How could Yousafzai improve the effectiveness of her
argument?
O by explaining why education is important for young
people
O by giving examples of other countries that value
education
O by describing ways that terrorists' actions and
beliefs conflict with Islam and Pashtun society
O by providing examples of how Islam and Pashtun
society support education for girls
Answer:
O by explaining why education is important for young
people
Unlike many other climbers, Sakura has her own climbing style. Her top competitors work their way slowly up the wall, pausing to rest and rethink their planned approach at each step, but Sakura plans her whole climb beforehand and moves up the wall without stopping, often leaping to grasp handholds that seem out of reach. This style means she falls more often than some other climbers but often gets several tries at a problem before her time is up. Which option best states the central idea of the passage? A. Climbers can win if they get to the top of the wall before the time is up. B. There is little chance Sakura will win because she falls so often. OC. Unlike other climbers, Sakura does not plan how to move up the wall. D. Sakura's climbing style stands out because of its constant motion. Unlike many other climbers , Sakura has her own climbing style . Her top competitors work their way slowly up the wall , pausing to rest and rethink their planned approach at each step , but Sakura plans her whole climb beforehand and moves up the wall without stopping , often leaping to grasp handholds that seem out of reach . This style means she falls more often than some other climbers but often gets several tries at a problem before her time is up . Which option best states the central idea of the passage ? A. Climbers can win if they get to the top of the wall before the time is up . B. There is little chance Sakura will win because she falls so often . OC . Unlike other climbers , Sakura does not plan how to move up the wall . D. Sakura's climbing style stands out because of its constant motion .
The option that best states the central idea of the passage is, unlike other climbers, Sakura does not plan how to move up the wall.
Who are climbers?Climbers are people who climb high mountains and cliffs. Climbers also climbs mountains which took them many days or months, like Mt. Everest.
The passage is about Sakura, who is a climber, and she approaches a unique style of climbing.
Thus, the correct option is C.
Learn more about climbers
https://brainly.com/question/1777635
#SPJ1
Answer:
D
Explanation:
This is an example of which type of reasoning?
As the given question is incomplete, please refer to the information given below to know more about reasoning and their types:
Reasoning is utilising one's intellect, which is connected to thinking and cognition. The study of logic focuses on how people can construct logically sound arguments using formal reasoning. Before selecting the course of action that will best serve your requirements or have the greatest overall benefit, you can use reasoning to compare the pros and disadvantages of two or more options. It also enables you to handle uncertainty, verify claims, and thoroughly analyse events in order to make decisions that are in your best interests.
Deductive reasoning is a sort of reasoning where a theory or hypothesis is proven using formal logic and observations. Deductive reasoning begins with an assumption, which is subsequently verified or disproved by observations or reasoned thought.Theories and presumptions are used in inductive reasoning to support observations. It differs from deductive reasoning in some aspects since it uses a specific case or cases to infer a broader norm.Analogical reasoning is a type of thought that seeks out similarities between two or more items and then uses those traits to discover further traits they have in common. It is based on the brain's propensity to recognise patterns and link ideas together.Abductive reasoning is a style of reasoning that draws a logical conclusion from an observation or group of observations. Similar to inductive reasoning, abductive reasoning allows the best estimates to lead to the most straightforward conclusions.In cause-and-effect reasoning, you establish the relationship between two events. This logic is used to describe what might occur if a certain action is taken or why certain circumstances exist.In order to reach a firm conclusion, critical thinking entails giving a subject careful consideration. It is useful in a variety of disciplines, including engineering, social sciences, and logic.Decompositional reasoning is the process of disassembling something into its component pieces in order to comprehend the purpose of each part and how it affects the operation of the thing as a whole.Therefore, hard cognitive work goes into reasoning. It is one of the best methods for conscious, regulated thinking that is geared toward problem-solving. It is practical in that a solution is always sought while keeping in mind the reality of the circumstance.
Learn more about 'reasoning' here-
https://brainly.com/question/3875697
#SPJ10
28
Select the correct answer from each drop-down menu.
Read the excerpt. Then choose the correct way to complete the paragraph.
A central idea in this excerpt is that many people migrated from Europe to Am
listing the
and providing examples of
total number of immigrants to America
European countries that immigrants left
origin countries of all immigrants
He decides to write about an event involving Odysseus.
Which are effective research questions to best develop
his topic?
• Where was Odysseus born? What are the names of
his parents?
Where did he travel on his journey?
What is the name of Odysseus's biggest battle? What
is his most important quality?
What happened in Odysseus's attempt to capture
Troy? What impact has this had upon modern life?
Who was Odysseus? Why is he important? How has
he influenced today's society?
The character Odysseus is the icon of Homer’s epic poetry, the Odyssey. The name of his parents was Laertes (father) and Anticlea who is the daughter of Autolycus (mother).
What is the central theme of the poem Odyssey?The central theme of this epic poem deals with the spiritual growth which relates to Telemachus and Odysseus. It also illustrates the idea of hospitality, loyalty, and vengeance.
Odysseus was born in Ithaca, an island in Greece. His most significant combat was the battle of Troy or the Trojan war which he combated for ten years. As a leader, he illustrated adequate qualities like resilience, fearlessness, and sovereignty.
Odysseus acted as a consultant rather than a fighter and was the one trustworthy in capturing the Trojan seer, Helenus. Odessey paved way for the emergence of western literature still prominent today.
Therefore, it is well described above.
To learn more about The Odyssey, refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/1904705
#SPJ1
John F. Kennedy delivered this speech in 1961 at the start of his term as US president. In this excerpt, he is speaking about tensions between the United States and its main rival, the Soviet Union. But neither can two great and powerful groups of nations take comfort from our present course—both sides overburdened by the cost of modern weapons, both rightly alarmed by the steady spread of the deadly atom, yet both racing to alter that uncertain balance of terror that stays the hand of mankind's final war. So let us begin a new—remembering on both sides that civility is not a sign of weakness, and sincerity is always subject to proof. Let us never negotiate out of fear. But let us never fear to negotiate. Let both sides explore what problems unite us instead of belaboring those problems which divide us. Let both sides, for the first time, formulate serious and precise proposals for the inspection and control of arms—and bring the absolute power to destroy other nations under the absolute control of all nations. Let both sides seek to invoke the wonders of science instead of its terrors. Together let us explore the stars, conquer the deserts, eradicate disease, tap the ocean depths, and encourage the arts and commerce. 1 Select the correct answer. What effect does the repetition of the word both have on the meaning of this text? A. It encourages unity between nations. B. It argues for the superiority of the United States. C. It explains the causes of the conflict between groups. D. It describes the differences between groups.
The use of the word "both", encourages unity between nations (A).
What did John F. Kennedy's speech mean?He often referenced the idea of the country coming together to work as a single one throughout his address. He is emphasized the populace that the nation must remain united in the face of even if there is a nuclear war, that all will need to work together to survive. Splitting because of variations in viewpoints and beliefs that don't take into account the big picture will only harm the nation in the long run. Long-term Kennedy worked hard to ensure that the public understands this.
Kennedy employs the term "both" about thirty times in his speech of only nine minutes. The number of times this word is used in comparison to the brief time he was speaking demonstrates how much Kennedy sought to foster and strengthen the audience's cohesion and rapport.
To learn more about John F. Kennedy speech refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/10111691
#SPJ10
Which element of this web page best supports an ethical appeal?
the sentence “Disasters affect everyone.”
the imperative statement “Be a hero!”
the image of the teens gathered together
the text “See what’s happening in your state!”
Answer:
the image of the teens gathered together
the text “See what’s happening in your state!”
Explanation:
Definition. An ethical appeal is a method of persuasion that's based on the author's credibility. It's one of the three appeals that Aristotle identified as the most effective tools of persuasive writing or speaking. looking at the three sentences.
see what's happening in your state seems to be more of an appeal than the other three. and suggest a connection between the writer and the reader via shared Location.
Read the two excerpts in the passage. Which common elements of narrative nonfiction are used in the excerpts?
Answer:
Whats the answers? Whats the reading passage? Its not showing up
Explanation:
How does this excerpt develop the central idea that Elizabeth Van Lew helped expand the role of women in society? Choose two answers.
It states how Van Lew acted as an important leader and manager at a time when women were generally discouraged from taking on those roles.
It shows that Van Lew was dedicated to a cause outside of her family and worked hard for her beliefs.
It illustrates how Van Lew became the most successful spy during the war and greatly helped the Union Army, though she was a woman.
It describes how Van Lew organized women to fight for their legal rights and equal representation in government.
1. It states how Van Lew acted as an important leader and manager at a time when women were generally discouraged from taking on those roles.
2. It shows that Van Lew was dedicated to a cause outside of her family and worked hard for her beliefs.
Thus, option 1 and 2 is correct.
What is The central idea of any literary work?The central idea of any literary work is the main point the writer is trying to make.
The author develops the central idea that Elizabeth Van Lew helped expand the role of women in society by showing how she acted as an important leader at a time when women were discouraged from taking such roles and also showing that she was totally dedicated to a cause which was not her family and she worked extremely hard for her beliefs.
Thus, option 1 and 2 is correct.
To learn more about literary work click here:
https://brainly.com/question/8971866
#SPJ1
We know through painful experience that freedom is never voluntarily given by the oppressor; it must be demanded by the oppressed.
How does King support this claim?
1) by describing his own experience with waiting for civil rights
2) by providing quotes from militant civil rights demonstrators
3) by explaining the racist attitudes of white politicians
4) by recalling a dream of his in which all people were equal
Answer:
by describing his own experience with waiting for civil rights
Explanation:
Answer:
by describing his own experience with waiting for civil rights
Explanation:
Which statement best describes why this excerpt contains an example of deductive reasoning?
It contains specific details that support a variety of different ideas.
It begins with broad statements and ends with more specific ones.
It uses clear examples that are easily understood by all readers.
It starts with a very simple idea and builds to a much grander idea.
Answer:
It begins with broad statements and ends with more specific ones.
Hope you have a great day :)
Answer:
B. It begins with broad statements and ends with more specific ones.
Explanation: got it right:)
How did listening to the dialogue in a portion of the play help you to better understand the kaufman's use of understatement and parody?
Answer:
The characters' voices showed understatement and satire. Readers must use their imaginations and follow the stage directions to imagine the characters' movements and characteristics. The reader may misinterpret the tone depending on their study of the stage instructions. Hearing the characters' tones and pitches clarified understatement and satire.
Explanation:
Please feel free to add your thoughts to this summary of my opinion.
