Discuss the claim that foreign policy and domestic policy are two faces of the same coin. give me full answers.
Answer:
Foreign policy and domestic policy are considered as the two faces of a coin because any change in both of these policies will impact on the macroeconomic variables of both the nation.
Explanation:
Foreign policy and domestic policy are considered as the two faces of a coin because any change in both of these policies will impact on the macroeconomic variables of both the nation.
with reference to the company act in Kenya ,describe the capacity of a company to enter into a binding contract.
Answer:
To enter into a binding contract, you have to be show that the presentation for the contract is made in a well label manner
The Victorian legislation which provides guidelines for solicitors to disclose information about costs.
Answer:
costs disclosure
Explanation:
The Victorian legislation provides guidelines for legal fee disclosures by solicitors to their clients. The legislation requires that solicitors must disclose legal costs in a cost disclosure statement as soon as they engage a client. This prevents the penalties or invalidity of a legal claim to costs. Exceptions may however apply where legal costs do not exceed $750 or client is government or commercial entity.
ANY COLLEGE STUDENT KNOW HOW EXAMITY WORKS?
Answer:
chill with the caps and uhh no
Explanation:
Under the Texas penal code one definition of “intoxicated” involves not having the normal use of ones mental or physical abilities as a result of consuming ?
Answer:
Alcohol
Explanation:
taking alcohol makes some changes in ones behavior
Vì sao nói tác phẩm báo chí là một chỉnh thể? Nhận thức tính chỉnh thể của tác phẩm báo chí có thể giúp ích gì cho nhà báo và công chúng trong quá trình sáng tạo và tiếp nhận báo chí?
Answer:
em cũng muốn hỏi
Explanation:
Need help with drivers Ed questions
Answer:
traditional and non traditional intersections
Explanation:
as a law enforcement officers, how you will handle a situation if a person with mental illness is involved?
A federal statute imposed criminal penalties for killing certain specified animals that have been determined by Congress to be of importance to the tourism industry in the region in which the animal was located. Among the animals protected was the red fox. However, a state in which the red fox was located classified the animal as a varmint that could be destroyed at will by anyone with a general hunting license. A rancher who possessed a valid state general hunting license regularly shot and killed red foxes that ate his artichoke plants.
If the rancher is prosecuted under the federal statute and challenges the constitutionality of the law, which of the following is the strongest constitutional argument in support of the federal statute?
a. The commerce power.
b. The Necessary and Proper Clause.
c. The police power.
d. The power to regulate federal lands.
Answer:
c.
Explanation:
If for example in a neighborhood , people have different rules as to what goes on their rented private lands and while the neighbor with blue house allows bugs as a cruelty free zoning opportunity ,the neighbor with the red house made it well known that any bugs that are on his land can be hurt and killed with any process as long as it doesn't affect his property.The bugs where killed but as the blue neighbor disagrees they go to the townspeople to settle if those bug should have been transported to the blue house.In this case the case should be given to the closest authority which is the police. please correct this story to explain the situation at hand.
Question 12 of 20
Which constitutional amendment expanded the right to vote?
A. Twenty-Second
B. Twenty-Third
C. Twenty Fifth
D. Twenty-Fourth
SSM
The 23rd amendment granted the District of Columbia the right to vote. The amendment granted access to Electoral votes as if it were a state.
Samatha has a small business selling clothes. Because his shop is too small to store all his goods so he must hire a warehouse. Each time that he took goods to the warehouse he was asked to sign an invoice which contained an exclusion clause stating that the warehouse owners were not liable for any damage to the goods. This invoice was put into effect in September 2020, whereas the contract had been agreed on July 2020. One day, Samatha came to take his clothes but realised that most of them were burned due to a fire. As a result, he required the warehouse owner to compenstate him and refuesed to pay for the storage. The warehouse owners brought action against him.
Question Completion:
Do the warehouse owners have to be responsible for the loss?
Answer:
Samatha Vs Warehouse Owners
Legally, the warehouse owners are not liable for the loss. Through a series of previous dealings, the contract terms were restated or amended using the exclusion clause on the invoice, which Samatha signed.
Samatha should have been aware that exclusion clauses lessen contractual liabilities, and if he had continued to sign the invoices bearing the exclusion clause without objection, then he had consented to the exclusion.
Therefore, the warehouse owners are entitled to payment for warehouse storage, and Samatha has lost his right to claim compensation for the damage to his warehoused goods.
Explanation:
According to the Uniform Commercial Code, a series of previous conduct between Samatha and the Warehouse owners may create a common basis for understanding and interpreting the amendment of the underlying contract. For example, an exclusion clause can be introduced in the contract through previous dealings.
list two items you can do to keep a DWI off your record!
Ngành nghề nào nhà nước cấm đầu tư.?
Answer:
Ngành, nghề cấm kinh doanh
Các hoạt động liên quan đến mua bán mại dâm. Kinh doanh pháo nổ trừ pháo tín hiệu, pháo thỏa thuận theo quy định của cơ quan nhà nước có thẩm quyền. Mua bán người và các bộ phận của con người. Kinh doanh hoạt động văn hóa nghệ thuật xâm phạm an ninh quốc gia và đạo đức xã hội.
Provision that authorizes payment to anyone fairly entitled to insurance proceeds only one to the insurance proceeds by reason of having incurred expenses
Provision that authorizes payment to anyone who is fairly entitled to the insurance proceeds because of having incurred expenses on behalf of the insured for medical treatment and/or burial
Answer:
Facility of Payment Clause
Explanation:
Facility of Payment Clause was formulated to prevent the need to nominate any of the administrator, executor, or guardian to obtain the insurance benefits, and then immediately fasten the settlement of disputes among rival claimants without the unnecessarily wasting time and going through litigation.
Hence, in this case, the right answer is Facility of Payment Clause
How does morden small business benifit form?
Answer Modern small businesses benefit from simplified and less expensive manufacturing processes and can grow without affecting the quality service they offer their customers.
A debt issued by a company as a negotiable instrument with a term of 9 months or less is a security that is exempt from registration and is called:
A. a short-swing trade.
B. short-term commercial paper.
A debt issued by a company as a negotiable instrument with a term of 9 months or less is considered short-term commercial paper and is exempt from registration.
What is short-term commercial paper?Commercial paper is a type of unsecured, short-term debt that is commonly issued by businesses to finance payrolls, payables, inventories, and other short-term liabilities.
Most commercial paper maturities range from a few weeks to months, with an average of around 30 days.
Option (a), short-swing trade is an incorrect answer because the SEC's short-swing profit rule requires corporate insiders to repay any profits generated from the acquisition and sale of company stock within a six-month period.
As a result, option (b) is the correct answer.
For more information regarding commercial paper, refer below
https://brainly.com/question/14632240
At trial in a criminal prosecution for theft, the defendant calls a witness to testify that he formerly knew the defendant as an army supply sergeant and that the defendant had turned down many opportunities for black marketeering.
Is the witness's testimony admissible?
Answer:
No. Should be no.
Explanation:
black marketeering has noting to do with prosecution because of theft.
BLACK MARKETEERING:
illegal traffic or trade in officially controlled commodities.
THEFT:
the physical removal of an object that is capable of being stolen without the consent of the owner and with the intention of depriving the owner of it permanently.
Black Marketeering pervention has nothing to do with stealing.
Drivers Ed confusing question
Answer:
T intersections
Explanation:
The T intersection is representing a 3 way sTop i hope this helps.
You must submit a report to the DMV within 15 days of a traffic accident on a Traffic accident report form. True or false?
Answer:
False
Explanation:
Quizlet - Unit 6 Lesson 3: Procedures When Involved In An Accident
First question.
Which one of the following statements is NOT part of the biochemical point of view?
The biochemical point of view is include viewing a statement from the scientific view point.
What is biochemical point of view?Biochemical view helps to view things or happening in a way to fit that help fill it into life form.
They are scientific view of a particular statement
Therefore, The biochemical point of view is include viewing a statement from the scientific
view point.
Learn more on biochemical below
https://brainly.com/question/3652831
#SPJ2
senate bill 35 is the zero tolerance law for someone over 21. true or false?
Answer:
False
Explanation:
California Senate Bill 35 is a statute streamlining housing construction in California counties and cities that fail to build enough housing to meet state mandated housing construction requirements. The bill was introduced to the California State Assembly by State Senator Scott Wiener on December 15, 2016
Asking yourself whether your mind is currently occupied by things that can take your concentration off the road is something you should do ______.
iebwbehwhjwjshehhee wuwiuehe.hwjwje ...
get your mind to think about other things so your concentrated
Choose all the statements about the common law that are CORRECT.
Italy has a common law legal system
Common law is found in legislation
Common law applies mainly to the lower classes
Common law is a system of law that relies on precedent cases
Common law and Equity developed as separate but complementary systems of law
Common law systems are adversarial
Common law refers to judge-made law
4 is the answer of the question
Answer:
common law and equity developed as separate but complementary systems of law
A person who knowingly causes the death of another while committing a criminal act, but who did not act under the influence of sudden passion, has committed
second degree murder.
involuntary manslaughter.
voluntary manslaughter.
first degree murder.
Answer:
I'm pretty sure its C. voluntary manslaughter
The theft of currency over a long period of time that tends to be commissioned for a modest amount of money but may not be considered to be financially damaging is called
ATM burglaries.
embezzlement.
forgery.
credit card fraud.
Answer:
the answer is embezzlement
A plaintiff sues her employer for sexual harassment. During the trial, the plaintiff attempts to introduce into evidence company records that include written complaints from other employees alleging that they too were sexually harassed by the employer. The defense objects to the admission of the records on the basis of hearsay. Should the objection be sustained?
Answer:
no
Explanation:
The evidence is most likely valid and can be useful so the judge shouldn't Sustain it.
No, Hearsay rule is the rule prohibiting hearsay (out of court statements offered as proof of that statement) from being admitted as evidence because of the inability of the other party to cross-examine the maker of the statement.
What is considered hearsay evidence?Hearsay evidence is evidence of a statement that was made other than by a witness while testifying at the hearing and that is offered to prove the truth of the matter stated.
Why hearsay is admissible?The hearsay rule does not exclude the evidence if it is an operative fact. Language of commercial offer and acceptance is also admissible over a hearsay exception because the statements have independent legal significance. Double hearsay is a hearsay statement that contains another hearsay statement itself.
To learn more about Hearsay rule, refer
https://brainly.com/question/18407390
#SPJ2
After a robbery, what is the purpose of conducting a neighborhood canvass?
to look for hiding suspects
to identify and interview witnesses
to check for footprints or tire tracks
to find stolen items
Answer:
b
Explanation:
if it's for the entire neighborhood, it being witnesses would make sense.
Law Enforcement can issue a DUI for driving under the influence of prescription drugs just as they would for
someone who wad been drinking and driving.
A. True.
B. False.
The statement" Law Enforcement can issue a DUI for driving under the influence of prescription drugs just as they would for someone who wad been drinking and driving" is True.
What is Law Enforcement?Law enforcement is the practice of some members of the government acting in a planned manner to uphold the law by identifying, discouraging, treating or punishing those who disobey the laws and social standards that govern that society.
The phrase refers to the legal system, courts, and prisons. By using record sharing and interdependent collaboration, these three elements can function alone or jointly.
The idea of law enforcement has been around since the dawn of time, and police and law enforcement have taken many different forms in all human communities.
The term "peace officer," or "law enforcement officer," is used in modern state legal codes to refer to every person who the legislating state has invested with police power or authority. Traditionally, law enforcement refers to anyone who is sworn or badged and has the authority to detain anyone for violating the law.
Learn more about Law Enforcement, here
https://brainly.com/question/10253135
#SPJ2
Why does it keep taking money from me I don't even use this app it's taking my money and I want it back
Answer:
1dk im sorry :(
Explanation:
Dany is an international trader in computer. In June 2018 he wrote a proposal to his most frequent client, Alan, saying that he was offering to sell 100 motorbikes, XYZ brand, latest version for US$1000/a motorbike. The detail description of a motorbike was in the Exhibit A attached with the contract.Alan immediately responded that he accepted the proposal, but he was only willing to receive the good in a safe and sound condition. Decide what are the legal nature of Dany's proposal and Alan’s reply?
Answer:
A proposal is subject to its acceptance by an offeree. An acceptance can be of three types given as under :-
A. Conditional Acceptance.
B. Express Acceptance.
C. Implied Acceptance.
In the above mentioned offer, Allan has given a conditional acceptance to dany about his willingness to accept the order in a safe and sound condition and thereby making a counteroffer to Dany. Dany after his consent to do so can enter into a contact. This is to be called as qualified acceptance
Explanation:
A proposal is subject to its acceptance by an offeree. An acceptance can be of three types given as under :-
A. Conditional Acceptance.
B. Express Acceptance.
C. Implied Acceptance.
In the above mentioned offer, Allan has given a conditional acceptance to dany about his willingness to accept the order in a safe and sound condition and thereby making a counteroffer to Dany. Dany after his consent to do so can enter into a contact. This is to be called as qualified acceptance
