Answers
Related Questions
On the very first day of college, a science professor was found murdered. The police had 4 suspects: The Physics professor, the football coach, the peon, and the principal. Police asked them about their whereabouts and, their replies were like this,The Physics professor said, “He was correcting mid-year test papers.”; The football coach said, “He was on the ground playing the game.”; The peon said, “He was serving tea.”; The principal said, “He was in his office.” The police found out who was lying and caught him. How?
Answers
Answer:
The physics professor is the killer.
Explanation:
It was the very first day of college. How could the physics professor be correcting mid-year test papers? Therefor, he is the culprit.
When does a crime scene investigator begin reconstructing a scene?
When the investigator first walks through the crime scene.
After lab analysis of collected evidence is returned.
Once a suspect has been identified.
When collecting trace evidence.
Answers
Answer:
When does a crime scene investigator begin reconstructing a scene?
When the investigator first walks through the crime scene.
After lab analysis of collected evidence is returned.
Once a suspect has been identified.
When collecting trace evidence.
Explanation:
I hope I helped you! :)
When is Search and Seizure Justfied?
Answers
Answer:
If the officer was proceeding in good faith
To obtain a search warrant or arrest warrant, the law enforcement officer must demonstrate probable cause that a search or seizure is justified.
What obstacles do defendants face when being represented by a public defender?
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
Defendants who are represented by public defenders may face several obstacles due to the nature of the public defender system. While public defenders play a crucial role in providing legal representation to those who cannot afford private attorneys, some of the challenges defendants may encounter include:
1. Heavy caseloads: Public defenders often have heavy workloads due to limited resources and high demand. This can result in limited time and attention dedicated to each case, potentially affecting the quality of representation.
2. Limited resources: Public defender offices typically operate with limited financial resources, which can impact their ability to conduct thorough investigations, hire expert witnesses, or provide other necessary resources for an effective defense.
3. Lack of specialization: Public defenders often handle a wide range of cases, including misdemeanors and felonies. This broad caseload may limit their ability to specialize in specific areas of law or develop expertise in particular types of cases.
4. Time constraints: Public defenders may face time constraints when preparing for cases, especially if they have multiple clients. This could result in limited opportunities for in-depth research, investigation, or developing a strong defense strategy.
5. Limited client interaction: Due to the high caseloads, public defenders may have limited time to communicate with their clients. This can impact the attorney-client relationship, potentially leading to difficulties in understanding the client's needs and building a solid defense strategy.
6. Systemic biases: Some argue that public defenders, as part of the criminal justice system, may face institutional pressures to prioritize efficiency over the best interests of their clients. This can result in conflicts of interest or less vigorous advocacy.
7. Public perception: Public defenders often face public skepticism or prejudice due to the belief that they may provide subpar legal representation compared to private attorneys. This perception can have an impact on how defendants are perceived by judges and juries.
It is important to note that not all public defender offices or individual public defenders face the same challenges. Some jurisdictions have better resources and support for public defenders, which can mitigate some of these obstacles. Additionally, public defenders can still provide competent and effective representation despite these challenges, but the obstacles they face can present unique difficulties in ensuring a fair trial and robust defense for defendants.
pls, I am so desperate I'll give brainliest!!! Jordan is especially interested in the concept of being presumed innocent until proven guilty. He is convinced that most jurors will form an initial opinion about whether or not the defendant is innocent or guilty from the first time they see the defendant. Jordan believes that initial impression can have a negative impact on the outcome of the case and plans to take that angle in the story he will be writing for the newspaper. To help Jordan determine if his theory is correct, you’ve decided to attend the trial with him and take on the role of a juror. You are determined to maintain an open mind and not form an initial impression of the defendant’s guilt or innocence.
Answer the following questions using a total of 3-5 sentences each:
How would you keep an open mind and truly presume the defendant is innocent at the start of the trial?
Describe at least three things you could do to uphold the presumption of innocence as a juror is supposed to do.
Answers
The key to keeping an open mind is to go in truly blind to the trial. That means the potential juror shouldn't have any exposure to media about the defendant or the events in question. The juror should learn everything during the court case itself when the prosecution presents the case carefully laid out, and the juror should also weigh the defenses argument as well. This is why jurors are not allowed to consume outside media, especially news articles or watch news on tv. In some cases, jurors are sequestered to isolate them further from the outside world to prevent accidental jury tampering. Unfortunately a lot of news in the modern era tends to have an editorialized spin to it. Meaning there are opinions, conjecture and speculation injected into things when they shouldn't be there. It should be facts only.
In addition to going into the case blind, the juror should also be free of any prejudices about the person's class, race, etc. These preconcieved notions tend to potentially affect the decision a juror would make, and these notions tend to be unintentional. If the juror could spot these tendencies and try to eradicate them (before they get worse), then it likely would lead to a more impartial juror.
Here are 3 things you could do to adhere to the philosophy of "innocent before proven guilty"
Keep the idea in your head that another person could be guilty.Try to put yourself in the shoes of the defendant.Everyone is human. Even if the first impression may have been a bad one, it could have just been a bad day for the defendant. The same may apply for the day in question involving the crime.At the end of the day, keep in mind the most important thing: The burden of proof lies with the prosecution and not the defense. It's up to the state to prove the defendant guilty. This is why the verdict is a simple binary choice of "guilty" vs "not guilty". It's because the jury is testing the claims made by the prosecution.
Please help me
Do you think drug offenders today should have a minimum prison sentence for using or selling drugs? Why or why not?
Answers
Answer:
I think that they should have a minimum sentence for using them.
Explanation:
This is because if your putting them on the street that can harm thousands of people but if you use you are only harming yourself.
When are you potentially putting your patient care behind other interest
Answers
Answer:
maybe when your socializing with them and not worrying about anything else.
Explanation:
Religion
Do you believe that people should have the right to worship whomever they want??
Answers
Answer:
No, they should worship what their religion is.
