The establishment of Israel in 1948 was a result of complex historical circumstances, including the Zionist movement, Jewish persecution during World War II, and competing claims to the land. It has had significant implications for regional dynamics and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Different individuals, communities, and nations hold diverse opinions on this matter based on their historical, political, and cultural perspectives. The question of whether the UN made the right decision in creating the state of Israel is a matter of subjective interpretation and continues to be a topic of debate.
The decision by the United Nations to create the state of Israel in 1947 has been a subject of ongoing debate and controversy. Supporters argue that the establishment of Israel was a necessary response to the persecution and displacement of Jewish people, particularly in the aftermath of the Holocaust. They believe that the creation of a Jewish homeland provided a safe haven for Jews and helped fulfill their aspirations for self-determinationan analysis of different perspectives on the creation of the state of Israel.The establishment of the state of Israel by the United Nations (UN) in 1948 is a complex and contentious issue that elicits diverse opinions. Supporters argue that the UN's decision was necessary to provide a homeland for Jewish people, particularly in the aftermath of the Holocaust. They believe it was a just response to historical injustices and a way to ensure the safety and self-determination of the Jewish population.On the other hand, critics argue that the creation of Israel resulted in the displacement and suffering of the Palestinian people, leading to ongoing conflicts in the region. They assert that the UN's decision disregarded the rights and aspirations of the Palestinian population and contributed to ongoing tensions.Ultimately, whether the UN made the right decision is subjective and depends on one's perspective and understanding of the historical and geopolitical context. It is a topic of ongoing debate and reflection, considering the complexities and ongoing conflicts in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.For more questions on Israel
https://brainly.com/question/9625232
#SPJ8
What were the major events of the war after the United States entered the conflict? How did the American war effort contribute to the defeat of the Central Powers?
Answer:
The United States entered World War I in April 1917, after years of attempting to remain neutral. Once the U.S. was involved in the conflict, it played a significant role in helping to defeat the Central Powers, particularly through its economic and military contributions. Some of the major events of the war after the U.S. entered include:
1. American Expeditionary Forces: The U.S. sent troops to Europe as part of the American Expeditionary Forces (AEF), which were commanded by General John J. Pershing. The AEF fought in several major battles, including the Meuse-Argonne Offensive in 1918.
2. Naval Blockade: The U.S. Navy played a major role in enforcing a blockade of German ports, which prevented Germany from receiving critical supplies and resources.
3. Economic Contributions: The U.S. contributed significant resources to the war effort, including food, weapons, and money.
4. Entry of fresh troops: The entry of fresh American troops into the war helped to boost the morale of the Allied forces, as well as provide additional manpower to fight on the front lines.
Overall, the American war effort contributed significantly to the defeat of the Central Powers. The entry of the U.S. into the war provided the Allies with additional resources, manpower, and supplies, which helped to turn the tide of the war. Additionally, the American economy played a crucial role in the war effort, as the U.S. was able to fund the war through loans and other financial contributions. In the end, the combined efforts of the Allies, including the U.S., led to the defeat of the Central Powers and the end of World War I.
HIV infection through blood transfusions is very rare in the US because all donated blood is carefully screened.
Please select the best answer from the choices provided.
T
F
Why was D-Day the greatest memory of World War II
Answer:
D-Day, the Allied invasion of Normandy on June 6, 1944, holds the distinction of being one of the greatest memories of World War II due to its profound impact and historical significance. It marked a pivotal turning point in the war, as it launched a massive assault by the Allied forces against Nazi-occupied Europe, opening up a crucial Western front. The meticulously planned and executed operation involved immense coordination, bravery, and sacrifice from the Allied soldiers who stormed the beaches under heavy fire. D-Day demonstrated the Allies' determination to liberate Europe from the grip of tyranny and marked the beginning of the end for Hitler's Third Reich. It stands as a symbol of courage, unity, and the triumph of democracy over oppression, forever etching its place in the collective memory of World War II.
Explanation:
What does the author refer to when saying, "Mexicans have had long and deep investments in claiming whiteness in the United States"?
TEXT: Mexicans have had long and deep investments in claiming whiteness in the United States. From the mid-nineteenth century, when they were first granted an "honorary white" status after the U.S.-Mexico War, through the mid-twentieth century, Mexicans struggled for equal rights by vigilantly claiming the rights and entitlements of whiteness.
The author is referring to the idea of white assimilation by Mexican immigrants in the United States.
This is a process that began in the mid-19th century, when Mexicans were granted an "honorary white" status after the U.S.-Mexico War. Through the mid-twentieth century, Mexicans endeavored to claim the rights of whiteness in order to gain access to the same level of rights, safety, and privileges that white citizens enjoyed in the United States.
This process of whitening, or racial uplift, was an effort to gain acceptance and recognition in a white-dominated society through deliberate attempts to blend in and conform to white norms and standards of behavior.
To know more about Mexican immigrants , click here:
https://brainly.com/question/31353191
#SPJ4
Match each Jacksonian idea with its effect on American society.
extension of suffrage laws
spoils system
Kitchen Cabinet
encouraged the party supporters to remain loyal to the party
arrowRight
encouraged equality between the common people and the upper class
arrowRight
kept the president updated on the current political issues
Answer:
extension of suffrage laws: encouraged equality between the common people and the upper class
spoils system: encouraged the party supporters to remain loyal to the party
Kitchen Cabinet: kept the president updated on the current political issues
Drag each condition to the correct location. Determine whether the following conditions existed in pre-revolutionary or post-revolutionary France. a. the government was a constitutional monarchy b. the clergy and nobles enjoyed special privileges c. a system of absolute monarchy existed d. special privileges of the clergy and nobles were abolished
The French Revolution had a profound impact on world history. It introduced the concepts of democracy, individual rights, and the rule of law, which have become fundamental to modern society. The Revolution also sparked a series of wars that would last for two decades and reshape the political landscape of Europe.
a. The government was a constitutional monarchy and c. A system of absolute monarchy existed were the conditions that existed in pre-revolutionary France. b. The clergy and nobles enjoyed special privileges were the conditions that existed in both pre-revolutionary and post-revolutionary France. d. Special privileges of the clergy and nobles were abolished was the condition that existed in post-revolutionary France. The French Revolution of 1789 was a turning point in European history.
It ended centuries of arbitrary power by monarchs and introduced the concept of the modern nation-state in which sovereignty rests with the people. The French Revolution was marked by the overthrow of the Bourbon monarchy, the execution of King Louis XVI, and the Reign of Terror that followed. The Revolution also led to the rise of Napoleon Bonaparte, who would rule France as its Emperor from 1804 until 1814, when he was defeated by a coalition of European powers at the Battle of Waterloo.
a. The government was a constitutional monarchy and c. A system of absolute monarchy existed were the conditions that existed in pre-revolutionary France. b. The clergy and nobles enjoyed special privileges were the conditions that existed in both pre-revolutionary and post-revolutionary France. d. Special privileges of the clergy and nobles were abolished was the condition that existed in post-revolutionary France.
For more such questions on French Revolution, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/1046744
#SPJ8
The 24th Amendment to the Constitution repealed the poll tax. This was a tax levied by some states to prevent Black and poor White voters from voting in a national election. What reason did some conservatives give to justify opposing the 24th Amendment?
Answer:Constitutional Amendments – Amendment 24 – “Elimination of Poll Taxes” Amendment Twenty-four to the Constitution was ratified on January 23, 1964. It abolished and forbids the federal and state governments from imposing taxes on voters during federal elections.
Explanation:
tensions leading up to World War 2 can be traced to which of the following?
Answer:
Primary themes in historical analysis of the war's origins include the political takeover of Germany in 1933 by Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party; Japanese militarism against China, which led to the Second Sino-Japanese War; Italian aggression against Ethiopia, which led to the Second Italo-Ethiopian War and Germany's initial success in negotiating the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact with the Soviet Union to divide the territorial control of Eastern Europe between them.
hope that was helpful
:D
How was William Wilberforce, a member of Parliament, able to affect the future of slavery in Britain? In 1833, he achieved a ban on the use of enslaved labor in factories. In 1807, he achieved a ban on British slave trade. In 1833, he was able to get reduced penalties for runaways. In 1804, he was able to get an amendment passed abolishing slavery in most Northern US states.
Answer:
William Wilberforce was a member of Parliament who played a key role in the abolition of the transatlantic slave trade and the eventual abolition of slavery in the British Empire.
In 1807, he was able to achieve a ban on the British slave trade through the passage of the Abolition of the Slave Trade Act. This made it illegal for British ships to transport enslaved Africans across the Atlantic.
In 1833, Wilberforce was able to achieve an even greater victory with the passage of the Slavery Abolition Act, which abolished slavery throughout the British Empire. This act also provided for the gradual emancipation of enslaved individuals and compensated slave owners for their loss of property.
While Wilberforce did not achieve a ban on the use of enslaved labor in factories, he did play a role in advocating for better working conditions and protections for workers, including enslaved workers.
Wilberforce's efforts to abolish slavery were based on his deeply-held Christian beliefs and his conviction that slavery was a moral wrong that needed to be eradicated. His tireless advocacy and leadership helped to galvanize public opinion and political action against the institution of slavery in Britain and beyond.
a.
settled in the middle colonies where religious tolerance was practiced.
b.
established a covenant community in Massachusetts based on principles of the Mayflower Compact.
c.
settled predominantly in the middle colonies where they founded trading posts and forts.
d.
worked for a temporary time to repay debt or pay for passage to the New World.
e.
were forcibly brought to the New World to act as labor force on cash crops.
f.
were granted charters (land grants) by the British King to settle in the New World and cultivate crops and resources for the crown.
1.
Indentured Servants
2.
African slaves
3.
Cavaliers
4.
Quakers
5.
Puritans
6.
Dutch, German, and Swedish immigrants
Answer2:
Explanation:
According to the chart, allied and neutral shipping losses first reached 600,000 tons in
According to the information we can ifer that the allied and neutral shipping losses first reached 600,000 tons in march.
What we can conclude from the chart?According to the chart we can conclude that allied and neutral shipping losses first reached 600,000 tons in march because the line of the graph relates the number of losses 600,000 with the month of march.
Additionally, we have to conside the rising relationship between losses and months. In this case, on January the allieed and neutral shipping losses started in less than 400,000 and rise close to 900,000 on april.
Learn more about shipping in: https://brainly.com/question/14678475
#SPJ1
In the sixteenth century, the population of enslaved Africans in North American grew rapidly due to the labor demand for what economic activity?
Answer: Cotton Growing
Explanation: It became so profitable for enslavers that it greatly increased their demand for both land and enslaved labor.
In the first Spanish colonies, how did nearly all Indigenous peoples die? poison disease sacrifice neglect
Answer:
Answer: Nearly all of American Indians died during the first Spanish colonies due to spread of Disease. Explanation: One of the most controversial subjects in American history is the decline in the native population after the Spanish invasion.
Explanation:
what is a pimary source
Examples of primary sources: Diaries, letters, memoirs, autobiographies. Interviews, speeches, oral histories, personal narratives. Scientific data and reports.
it just has to be first hand
1. How would you characterize Machiavelli’s view of the Ottoman state? Does he see it clearly as superior or inferior to that of France, or just different?
2. Does religion enter into Machiavelli’s analysis?
3. Many at the time criticized Machiavelli’s Prince for its amoral analysis of political life and its assertion that rulers must set aside concerns about morality to rule effectively. Is there anything in this passage that supports this interpretation of Machiavelli’s thought?
Kindly answer in sentences and with no bullet points. Need to be 300 words max.
1. Machiavelli sees the Ottoman state as different from France, without clear superiority or inferiority.
2. Religion does not play a significant role in Machiavelli's analysis.
3. The passage supports the interpretation of Machiavelli's thought as amoral, prioritizing practicalities over morality in political life.
1. Machiavelli's view of the Ottoman state can be characterized as different from that of France rather than explicitly superior or inferior. He notes that the Turkish monarchy is governed by a single ruler who controls his kingdom through appointed administrators. In contrast, France is governed by numerous ancient nobles who hold recognized status and are loved by their subjects. The nobles possess prerogatives that the king cannot strip away without endangering his own position. Machiavelli suggests that acquiring the Turkish state would be difficult due to the absence of internal divisions or rebellious subjects that an invader could exploit. The Turkish people, described as slaves, are unlikely to rebel or assist an outside invader. However, once the Turkish ruler is conquered and his family is eliminated, there is no one left to pose a significant threat to the conqueror's rule.
2. Religion does not enter prominently into Machiavelli's analysis of the Ottoman state in this passage. Instead, he focuses on the political dynamics and challenges faced by an invader or ruler seeking to acquire and hold these different types of states. The passage primarily examines the practical aspects of acquiring and maintaining power, rather than considering religious factors.
3. The passage indeed supports the interpretation of Machiavelli's thought as amoral in its analysis of political life. Machiavelli emphasizes the practicalities of acquiring and consolidating power, advising strategies such as extinguishing the ruling family and suppressing potential sources of opposition. He does not consider ethical or moral constraints in these calculations. Instead, he analyzes the political realities and offers advice based on the pursuit and consolidation of power. This aligns with the criticism of Machiavelli's Prince for its amoral analysis of political life, suggesting that rulers must set aside concerns about morality to effectively govern.
Learn more about Machiavelli’s view at
https://brainly.com/question/29238789
#SPJ4
What was Diderot’s Encyclopedia?
Diderot's Encyclopedia, also known as Encyclopédie, was a landmark publication during the Enlightenment period in the 18th century. It was a comprehensive compilation of knowledge and ideas, aiming to gather and disseminate information on various subjects such as science, philosophy, arts, politics, and more. Edited by Denis Diderot and Jean le Rond d'Alembert, the Encyclopedia sought to challenge traditional authority and promote critical thinking by providing accessible and comprehensive knowledge to the public. It played a significant role in spreading Enlightenment ideals and contributing to intellectual and social progress.
How did Indigenous people react to white settlers in the Northwest Territory? They negotiated with the settlers. They moved out as settlers moved in. They attacked settlements in retaliation. They fought with other Indigenous groups.
Answer:
The reaction of Indigenous people to white settlers in the Northwest Territory varied depending on the specific tribe and circumstances. However, all of the options presented in the question were possible reactions in different situations.
1. Negotiation: Some Indigenous groups initially attempted to negotiate with white settlers in order to establish peaceful relationships and protect their interests. However, these negotiations often failed to achieve a lasting peace, as settlers frequently broke agreements and encroached on Indigenous lands.
2. Displacement: As white settlers moved into Indigenous territories, many Indigenous groups were forced to move out of their traditional lands and into new areas. This displacement was often violent and traumatic, as Indigenous people were uprooted from their homes and forced to adapt to new environments.
3. Retaliation: In some cases, Indigenous groups attacked white settlements in retaliation for encroachments on their lands or other grievances. These attacks could be devastating for both sides and often led to a cycle of violence and reprisals.
4. Conflict with other Indigenous groups: The arrival of white settlers in the Northwest Territory often disrupted long-standing relationships between different Indigenous groups, leading to conflicts and competition over resources. In some cases, these conflicts escalated into violence.
Overall, the relationship between Indigenous people and white settlers in the Northwest Territory was complex and multifaceted, with a range of reactions depending on the specific circumstances and perspectives of different groups.
Which of the following was the core area of the Incan Empire? Brasilia B) Machu Picchu Lima D) Quito Tiahuanaco
The core area of the Incan Empire was D) Cusco.
The Incan Empire's political, administrative, and cultural hub was Cusco. It was regarded as the imperial capital and was situated in modern-day Peru. The Incas ascribed immense significance to Cusco, considering it to be the origin and focal point of their entire world.
The Incan Empire, which had its capital in Cusco, ruled over huge areas of South America, including what is now Peru, Ecuador, Bolivia, Chile, and portions of Colombia and Argentina.
Learn more about Incan Empire:
brainly.com/question/1792728
#SPJ4
The complete question is:
Which Of The Following Was The Core Area Of The Incan Empire? A) Brasilia B) Machu Picchu C) Lima D) Cusco E) Tiahuanaco.
How did the Great Famine affect Europeans’ health?
Answer:
The Great Famine, also known as the Great European Famine, was a period of extreme food shortage and widespread starvation that occurred in Europe between 1315 and 1317.
Explanation:
Malnutrition and Starvation: The primary consequence of the Great Famine was widespread malnutrition and starvation. The scarcity of food led to a severe lack of essential nutrients, resulting in weakened immune systems, weight loss, and increased susceptibility to diseases.
Increased Disease Vulnerability: Malnutrition weakens the body's immune system, making individuals more vulnerable to infectious diseases. During the Great Famine, people's weakened health made them more susceptible to various illnesses, including respiratory infections, dysentery, typhus, and other communicable diseases.
Higher Mortality Rates: The combination of malnutrition and increased susceptibility to diseases led to a significant increase in mortality rates during the Great Famine. The lack of food and the resulting health crises caused countless deaths, especially among the vulnerable population, such as children, the elderly, and those already weakened by other factors.
What profession did Gandhi study in England
Summarize the movement known as the Second Great Awakening between the 1820s and 1850s. What are the origins of the second great awakening? What are the major social reform movements associated with the second great awakening? How did the second great awakening and its associated social reforms influence American society and politics in the 19th century?
Instead of relying on a pastor, regular people were urged to have a personal relationship without God. As more recent groupings, Methodists and Baptists, for instance, expanded swiftly. Analysts claim that while the movement united the colonies and spurred church growth, it also caused conflict. A period of societal change, with a focus on institutional redemption, was ushered in by the Second Great Awakening.
In the 1790s and early 1800s, Presbyterians, Methodists, and Baptists in Kentucky and Tennessee experienced a religious fervour and revival.
Social reform movements including abolitionism and temperance had their beginnings during the Second Great Awakening, which was marked by a wave of fervent religious revivals. Make the decision to reject sin and live a morally upright life. He also exhorted people to lend a hand to those in need. Over the course of the nineteenth century, numerous social reform groups emerged and developed. Abolition, temperance, labour and industrial safety, education, women's rights, and jail reform were among the themes that these societies addressed.
Learn more about Great Awakening, here:
https://brainly.com/question/29264170
#SPJ4
What was the dominant subsistence pattern throughout much of human history? How, when, and why did the first people populate the Americas? What are some of the causes and results of plant and animal domestication in the Americas? How does the surplus create by intensive agriculture influence society? What was one of the primary reasons for the death of nearly 90% of Native Americans immediately after European contact?
What were England’s the two reasons for colonization in North America? What was the first permanent colony in North America—and why was it almost a failure? What were the three sources of labor used by the colonists? What was the primary cause for high mortality rates in the southern colonies?
Can someone answer the following questions? As well as giving me a website where I can cite the information given?
Answer:
Here are answers to your questions with Britannica.com as a suggested citation source:
What was the dominant subsistence pattern throughout much of human history?
Hunting and gathering was the dominant subsistence pattern for most of human history, starting with our early hominin ancestors and continuing until the Agricultural Revolution about 10,000–12,000 years ago. As hunter-gatherers, early humans relied on foraging wild plants and hunting wild animals for food.
How, when, and why did the first people populate the Americas?
The first people are believed to have migrated from Siberia to Alaska across the land bridge of the Bering Strait around 15,000–17,000 years ago when sea levels were lower. They entered the Americas in search of new hunting grounds and sources of food as the last Ice Age was coming to an end.
What are some of the causes and results of plant and animal domestication in the Americas?
The earliest domesticated crops in the Americas were squash, peppers and beans and the practice spread from Mesoamerica. Domesticated animals included the turkey, llama and alpaca. Plant and animal domestication resulted in more reliable food sources, population growth and the rise of sedentary, agricultural societies.
How does the surplus create by intensive agriculture influence society?
Agricultural surpluses allowed for the rise of non-farming specialists like priests, artisans, rulers and soldiers. They also enabled the growth of trade, cities, political complexity and cultural innovations like writing and mathematics. Surpluses were the foundation for the emergence of civilization itself.
What was one of the primary reasons for the death of nearly 90% of Native Americans immediately after European contact?
One of the main reasons for the massive depopulation was the spread of Eurasian diseases to which Native Americans lacked immunity. Diseases like smallpox, measles and influenza ravaged Native populations who had no evolutionary exposure or resistance to the germs carried by Europeans.
I'd suggest citing specifics using britannica.com to back up the information provided in my responses here. Please let me know if you have any other questions.
Match each US Cold War strategy to the event in which it was used.
aid to Greece
Marshall Plan
CIA formed
Berlin Wall
containment
arrowRight
domino theory
arrowRight
brinksmanship
arrowRight
intelligence gathering
arrowRight
Answer:
US Cold War strategy :
aid to Greece -> containment
Marshall Plan -> domino theory
CIA formed -> intelligence gathering
Berlin Wall -> brinksmanship
The central government created under the Articles of Confederation had no
power to enforce laws. How did this affect the new country?
Answer: It didn't form a solid The lack of power to enforce laws by the central government under the Articles of Confederation led to chaos and instability in the new country. States had their laws, currency, and militia, which led to conflicts and hindered trade. This situation made it clear that a stronger federal government was necessary to establish order and promote economic growth. The lack of power to enforce laws by the central government created under the Articles of Confederation had a significant impact on the new country. Without a way to ensure that laws were followed, individual states could act in ttheir interestest, leading to conflicts and an unstable government. This weakness was one of the main reasons why the Articles of Confederation were eventually replaced by the stronger Constitution of the Unite d Stalackanof d central government.
Explanation: The Articles of Confederation was like a rough draft
which of the following is not one of the three basic concepts of government that settlers from england brought to america? a. ordered government c. limited government b. totalitarian government d. representative government
Answer:
The answer is b. totalitarian government.
The three basic concepts of government that settlers from England brought to America are:
a. Ordered government - the idea that government should be organized and operate according to a set of rules and procedures.
b. Limited government - the idea that government should be restricted in its powers and that individual rights should be protected from government overreach.
c. Representative government - the idea that government should be based on the consent of the governed, with elected representatives serving as the voice of the people in government.
Totalitarian government, on the other hand, is a form of government in which the state exercises total control over all aspects of society and individual rights are suppressed. This is not a concept that the settlers from England brought to America.
How did the Spanish and French differ in their treatment of Indigenous peoples? The Spanish forced Indigenous peoples to convert to Christianity while the French built relationships with them. The French arrived in large numbers, while the Spanish arrived in small numbers. The French were dependent on the fur trade, while the Spanish were dependent on the sugar trade. The Spanish built relationships with Indigenous peoples, while the French forced their culture onto them.
Answer: attachment to file 1.
Explanation:
Why is judicial review an important aspect of the U.S. government?
Answer:
Judicial review is an important aspect of the U.S. government because it allows the judicial branch of government to serve as a check on the legislative and executive branches, ensuring that they do not exceed their constitutional authority.
Under the system of judicial review, the courts have the power to review the constitutionality of laws and executive actions. This means that if a law or action is found to be in violation of the Constitution, the courts have the power to declare it invalid and unenforceable. This power is derived from the principle of "judicial supremacy," which holds that the Constitution is the supreme law of the land, and that the courts have the final authority to interpret and apply it.
By providing a check on the legislative and executive branches, judicial review helps to ensure that the government operates within the bounds of the Constitution and protects the rights and freedoms of citizens. It also helps to prevent abuses of power and can serve as a safeguard against tyranny and oppression.
Overall, judicial review is an essential aspect of the U.S. government because it helps to maintain the balance of power among the three branches of government and ensures that the government operates in accordance with the principles and values enshrined in the Constitution.
What did the Germans create as a solution to the "Jewish problem"
Answer:
The term “Final Solution of the Jewish Question” was a euphemism used by Nazi Germany’s leaders. It referred to the mass murder of Europe’s Jews. It brought an end to policies aimed at encouraging or forcing Jews to leave the German Reich and other parts of Europe. Those policies were replaced by systematic annihilation.
an example of this was concentration camps. these were created to wipe out populations of Jewish people in short spaces of time.
hope that helped
:)
How did the fifteenth amendment to the us constitution contribute to the women’s movement
The 15th Amendment declared that "the right of citizens ... to vote shall not be denied or abridged ... on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude" – but women of all races were still denied the right to vote. To Susan B. Anthony, the rejection of women's claim to the vote was unacceptable.
Happy to help; have a great day! :)
The major cause of the conflict between the christian highland kingdom and the muslim sultanates?
Answer:
The conflict between the Christian highland kingdom and the Muslim sultanates was due to the interest of the Christian kingdom in controlling trade and trade routes between the Ethiopian highlands and the Red Sea coast.
This became a root cause of the armed conflict between the Christian kingdom and the Muslim sultanates. It should be noted that this inter-state rivalry was not over religious issues but rather over basic economic interests.
Explanation:
(: