find the perimeter of of the shaded figure. ? units

Answer:

108 pages

Step-by-step explanation:

Angelina read 30% of the book that contains 360 pages.

30% of 360 pages

"of" also means multiply, so we must multiply 30% and 360.

30% * 360

Convert 30% to a decimal. Divide 30 by 100, or move the decimal place 2 spots to the left.

30/100=0.30

or

30.0---> 3.0---> 0.30

Plug the decimal in for the percent.

0.30*360

Multiply the 2 numbers together

108

Angelina has read 108 pages so far.

Answer:

Look at the money bags below!!! (but I'll give you the answer)

Step-by-step explanation:

John F: 7 full bags - 1 half

Juan A: 9 full bags

Jason A: 3 full bags

Nick J: 3 full bags- 1 half

Alfonso S: 8 full bags

Hope this helped and wasn't confusing!!! xx - Asia

Answer:

x = -3        x=8

Step-by-step explanation:

(x+3)(x-8)=0

Using the zero product property

x+3 =0   x -8 = 0

x = -3        x=8

Answer:

csc ø = 5/3 ; sec ø = 5/4

Step-by-step explanation:

cot ø = adj/opp

adj = 4

opp = 3

after that, we must find the hypotenuse by using phytagoras theorem

hpy² = adj² + opp²

hpy² = 4² + 3²

hpy² = 25

hpy = 5

now let's find the other

csc ø (not scs) = hyp/opp = 5/3

sec ø = hyp/adj = 5/4

Answer:

The scale factor is 3.

Step-by-step explanation

Figure B has side measures 16, 20, and 9. Figure A has side measures 48, 27, and 60. The ratio of each of the corresponding sides is 1:3 (16:48, etc). Therefore, the scale factor of Figure B to Figure A is 3.

Answer:

2

Step-by-step explanation:

Set the height of the bar to 2 since there are 2 numbers between 21-40.

Answer:

2 people.

Step-by-step explanation:

34 minutes and 40 minutes were recorded.

Therefore, 2 people.

75km convert to m 75x1000=75000m

converted I hour to seconds that is 3600seconds

If 75000m=3600seconds

? =5seconds

that id 75000x5=375000/3600

=104.26…metres

The distance will be 104.16 meters if the car is driving at 75 kilometers per hour.

Distance is a numerical representation of the distance between two items or locations. Distance refers to a physical length or an approximation based on other physics or common usage considerations.

It is given that:

A car is driving at 75 kilometers per hour.

Let x be the distance.

As we know from the distance time relation:

Distance = speed×time

Speed = 75 km/h

Speed = 75 km/(3600)seconds

Speed = 0.0208 km/s

x = 0.0208×5

x = 0.10416 km

in meters

x  = 0.104x1000

x = 104.16 meters

Thus, the distance will be 104.16 meters if the car is driving at 75 kilometers per hour.

Learn more about the distance here:

brainly.com/question/26711747

#SPJ2

Answer:

C

Step-by-step explanation:

C=2pier or pied

Answer:

a. C = 2πr

c. C= πd

both are correct

Answer:  EF = 15

Step-by-step explanation:

The given description is that of an isosceles triangle. The base angles are congruent, therefore the sides opposite of those angles are also congruent.

The base angles are ∠E and ∠G and the vertex angle is ∠F.

The sides opposite to the base angles are EF and FG.

Thus, EF ≡ FG.

Since FG = 15 and FG = EF, then 15 = EF.

Based on the definition of an isosceles triangle, the length of EF in the triangle is: 15 units.

An isosceles triangle has two sides that are congruent. The angles opposite these congruent sides are also congruent.

ΔEFG is an isosceles triangle. The congruent sides are, FG and EF.

Therefore, EF = FG = 15 units.

Learn more about isosceles triangle on:

https://brainly.com/question/11884412

Answer: the answer is 4

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

4

Step-by-step explanation:

4 on edgunity 2020

Answer:

(2,-2)

Step-by-step explanation:

In the attached file

Answer: y

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

The number of female faculty in the Department with a PhD is 8.

Step-by-step explanation:

There are 14 + 30 = 44 faculty members.

Of those, x are male and y are female.

Then

x + y = 44.

The number of female faculty who do not have a PhD is 10 more than the number of females who have a PhD.

y = z + w

z is the number of females with PhD.

w is the number of females without PhD.

w = z + 10

If a third of the male faculty in the Department have a PhD

[tex]\frac{x}{3} + z = 14[/tex]

Now, we can write all variables as functions of z, which is the number of female faculty in the Department with PhD.

The objective is:

To find z from the first equation, that is:

[tex]x + y = 44[/tex]

To do this, we have to write x and y as functions of z.

Writing x and y as functions z.

[tex]\frac{x}{3} + z = 14[/tex]

[tex]\frac{x}{3} = 14 - x[/tex]

[tex]x = 3(14 - z)[/tex]

[tex]x = 42 - 3z[/tex]

And

[tex]y = z + w[/tex]

In which

[tex]w = 10 + z[/tex]

So

[tex]y = z + 10 + z[/tex]

[tex]y = 2z + 10[/tex]

Replacing:

[tex]x + y = 44[/tex]

[tex]42 - 3z + 2z + 10 = 44[/tex]

[tex]-z + 52 = 44[/tex]

[tex]z = 52 - 44[/tex]

[tex]z = 8[/tex]

The number of female faculty in the Department with a PhD is 8.

Answer:

(a) The probability that all five have used a computer while under the influence of alcohol is 0.0021.

(b) The probability that at least one has not used a computer while under the influence of alcohol is 0.9979.

(c) The probability that none of the five have used a computer while under the influence of alcohol is 0.1804.

(d) The probability that at least one has used a computer while under the influence of alcohol is 0.8196.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that among 25- to 30-year-olds, 29% say they have used a computer while under the influence of alcohol.

Suppose five 25- to 30-year-olds are selected at random.

The above situation can be represented through the binomial distribution;

[tex]P(X = x) = \binom{n}{r}\times p^{r} \times (1-p)^{n-r} ; x = 0,1,2,3,.........[/tex]

where, n = number of trials (samples) taken = Five 25- to 30-year-olds

            r = number of success

            p = probability of success which in our question is probability that

                  people used a computer while under the influence of alcohol,

                   i.e. p = 29%.

Let X = Number of people who used computer while under the influence of alcohol.

So, X ~ Binom(n = 5, p = 0.29)

(a) The probability that all five have used a computer while under the influence of alcohol is given by = P(X = 5)

               P(X = 5)  =  [tex]\binom{5}{5}\times 0.29^{5} \times (1-0.29)^{5-5}[/tex]

                              =  [tex]1 \times 0.29^{5} \times 0.71^{0}[/tex]

                              =  0.0021

(b) The probability that at least one has not used a computer while under the influence of alcohol is given by = P(X [tex]\geq[/tex] 1)

Here, the probability of success (p) will change because now the success for us is that people have not used a computer while under the influence of alcohol = 1 - 0.29 = 0.71

SO, now X ~ Binom(n = 5, p = 0.71)

               P(X [tex]\geq[/tex] 1)  =  1 - P(X = 0)   

                              =  [tex]1-\binom{5}{0}\times 0.71^{0} \times (1-0.71)^{5-0}[/tex]

                              =  [tex]1 -(1 \times 1 \times 0.29^{5})[/tex]

                              =  1 - 0.0021 = 0.9979.

(c) The probability that none of the five have used a computer while under the influence of alcohol is given by = P(X = 0)

               P(X = 0)  =  [tex]\binom{5}{0}\times 0.29^{0} \times (1-0.29)^{5-0}[/tex]

                              =  [tex]1 \times 1 \times 0.71^{5}[/tex]

                              =  0.1804

(d) The probability that at least one has used a computer while under the influence of alcohol is given by = P(X [tex]\geq[/tex] 1)

               P(X [tex]\geq[/tex] 1)  =  1 - P(X = 0)   

                              =  [tex]1-\binom{5}{0}\times 0.29^{0} \times (1-0.29)^{5-0}[/tex]

                              =  [tex]1 -(1 \times 1 \times 0.71^{5})[/tex]

                              =  1 - 0.1804 = 0.8196

Answer:

=3651 km^2

Step-by-step explanation:

The rectangle at the top is 11 km by 32 km

The area is 11*32 =352

The rectangle at the bottom is 9 km by 11 km

The area is 9*11 = 99

Add the two areas together

352+99 =451 km^2

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The formula for determining the confidence interval for the difference of two population means is expressed as

Confidence interval = (x1 - x2) ± z√(s²/n1 + s2²/n2)

Where

x1 = sample mean salary of city 1 librarians

x2 = sample mean salary of city 2 librarians

s1 = sample standard deviation for city 1

s2 = sample standard deviation for city 2

n1 = number of soles for city 1

n1 = number of soles for city 2

For a 95% confidence interval, we would determine the z score from the t distribution table because the number of samples are small

Degree of freedom =

(n1 - 1) + (n2 - 1) = (15 - 1) + (15 - 1) = 28

z = 2.048

x1 - x2 = 28,900 - 30,300 = - 1400

Margin of error = 2.048√(s1²/n1 + s2²/n2) = 2.036√(2300²/15 + 2100²/15)

= 1647

The upper boundary for the confidence interval is

- 1400 + 1647 = 247

The lower boundary for the confidence interval is

- 1400 - 1647 = - 3047

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The point estimate is the sample proportion.

Considering the sample,

Sample proportion, p = x/n

Where

x = number of success = 137

n = number of samples = 200

p = 137/200 = 0.685

From the information given,

Population proportion = 62% = 62/100 = 0.62

The correct options are

A) Yes, the sample size is greater than 30.

B) Yes, there are at least 10 adults saying they get their news from social media and at least 10 that do not.

Answer:

149.14 [tex]m^{2}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Area of a circle = π[tex]r^{2}[/tex]

so A = π * 6.89^2 = 149.14 (to 2d.p.)

Answer:

No. There is not enough evidence to support the claim that the proportion of liberals is higher than that reported by the polling​ organization (P-value = 0.0366).

Step-by-step explanation:

The question is incomplete: there is no information about the results of the survey. We will assume that 55 of the subjects answer "liberal", and test the claim.

This is a hypothesis test for a proportion.

The claim is that the proportion of liberals is higher than that reported by the polling​ organization.

Then, the null and alternative hypothesis are:

[tex]H_0: \pi=0.22\\\\H_a:\pi>0.22[/tex]

The significance level is 0.01.

The sample has a size n=200.

The sample proportion is p=0.275.

[tex]p=X/n=55/200=0.275[/tex]

The standard error of the proportion is:

[tex]\sigma_p=\sqrt{\dfrac{\pi(1-\pi)}{n}}=\sqrt{\dfrac{0.22*0.78}{200}}\\\\\\ \sigma_p=\sqrt{0.000858}=0.029[/tex]

Then, we can calculate the z-statistic as:

[tex]z=\dfrac{p-\pi-0.5/n}{\sigma_p}=\dfrac{0.275-0.22-0.5/200}{0.029}=\dfrac{0.053}{0.029}=1.792[/tex]

This test is a right-tailed test, so the P-value for this test is calculated as:

[tex]\text{P-value}=P(z>1.792)=0.0366[/tex]

As the P-value (0.0366) is greater than the significance level (0.01), the effect is  not significant.

The null hypothesis failed to be rejected.

There is not enough evidence to support the claim that the proportion of liberals is higher than that reported by the polling​ organization.

Answer:

1) Antonio's statement

2) <A = 123

Step-by-step explanation:

1) Antonio's statement is incorrect. This is because the opposite angles of a quadrilateral add up to 180°. Erin was incorrect because the opposite angles of this quadrilateral are unequal.

2) 2x+7+5x-2 = 180° (opposite angles of quadrilateral)

Now

7x+5 = 180

7x = 175

x = 25

<A = 5x-2

= 5(25)-2

= 125-2

= 123

Answer:

[tex]CI = (\bar{x_{1} } - \bar{x_{2}} ) \pm MoE\\\\[/tex]

[tex]CI = (527 - 439) \pm 25.75\\\\CI = 88 \pm 25.75\\\\CI = 88 - 25.75 \:\: and \:\: 88 + 25.75\\\\CI = (62.2 \: ,\: 113.8 )[/tex]

The correct answer choice is a. (62.2, 113.8)

Step-by-step explanation:

Of the 500 customers who were told the increase applied to charges above $1000 each month, the average increase in spending was $527 with a standard deviation of $225.

Sample size = n₁ = 500

Sample mean = x₁ = $527

Standard deviation = s₁ = $225

Of the 500 customers who were told the increase applied to charges above $2000 each month, the average increase in spending was $439 with a standard deviation of $189

Sample size = n₂ = 500

Sample mean = x₂ = $439

Standard deviation = s₂ = $189

We are asked to find the 95% confidence interval for the difference between two means.

The given group of answer choices are

a. (62.2, 113.8)

b. (86.2, 120.5)

c. (10.3, 23.8)

d. (55.6, 67.8)

The confidence interval for the difference between two means is given by

[tex]CI = (\bar{x_{1} } - \bar{x_{2}} ) \pm MoE\\\\[/tex]

Where [tex]\bar{x_{1} }[/tex] and [tex]\bar{x_{2} }[/tex] are the given sample means and margin of error is given by

[tex]$ MoE = z_{\alpha/2} \cdot \sqrt{\frac{s_{1}^2}{n_1} + \frac{s_{2}^2}{n_2}} $[/tex]

The z-score corresponding to 95% confidence level is given by

Significance level = α = 1 - 0.95 = 0.05/2 = 0.025

From the z-table at α = 0.025 the z-score is 1.96

[tex]$ MoE = 1.96 \cdot \sqrt{\frac{225^2}{500} + \frac{189^2}{500}} $[/tex]

[tex]MoE = 1.96 \cdot 13.14[/tex]

[tex]MoE = 25.75[/tex]

Finally,

[tex]CI = (\bar{x_{1} } - \bar{x_{2}} ) \pm MoE\\\\[/tex]

[tex]CI = (527 - 439) \pm 25.75\\\\CI = 88 \pm 25.75\\\\CI = 88 - 25.75 \:\: and \:\: 88 + 25.75\\\\CI = (62.2 \: ,\: 113.8 )[/tex]

Therefore, the correct answer choice is a. (62.2, 113.8)

How to use z-table?

In the z-table find the probability of 0.025

Note down the value of that row, it would be 1.9.

Note down the value of that column, it would be 0.06.

Add the two numbers together.

The z-score is 1.9 + 0.06 = 1.96

The question is incomplete! Complete question along with answer and step by step explanation is provided below.

Question:

A sports physician conducts an observational study to learn the average amount of time that 3,000 swimmers in the town can hold their breath underwater. He uses 150 sampling of 60 people. The average of the means of all the samplings is 72.7, and the standard deviation is 0.92. This is a histogram of the sampling distribution of the sample mean. Based on this data, with a 95% confidence interval the researchers can determine that the actual average amount of time the entire population can hold their breath under water is?

Given Information:

sample mean time = 72.7

sample standard deviation = 0.92

Sampling size = n = 150

Confidence level = 95%

Required Information:

95% confidence interval = ?  

Answer:

[tex]\text {confidence interval} = \bar{x} \pm MoE\\\\\text {confidence interval} = 72.7 \pm 0.14836\\\\\text {confidence interval} = 72.7 - 0.14836, \: 72.7 + 0.14836\\\\\text {confidence interval} = (72.552, \: 72.848)\\\\[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

The confidence interval is given by

[tex]\text {confidence interval} = \bar{x} \pm MoE\\\\[/tex]

Where [tex]\bar{x}[/tex] is the sample mean time and Margin of error is given by

[tex]$ MoE = t_{\alpha/2}(\frac{s}{\sqrt{n} } ) $ \\\\[/tex]

Where n is the sampling size, s is the sample standard deviation, and [tex]t_{\alpha/2}[/tex] is the t-score corresponding to 95% confidence level.

The t-score corresponding to 95% confidence level is

Significance level = 1 - 0.95 = 0.05/2 = 0.025

Degree of freedom = n - 1 = 150 - 1 = 149

From the t-table at α = 0.025 and DoF = 149

t-score = 1.975

[tex]MoE = t_{\alpha/2}(\frac{s}{\sqrt{n} } ) \\\\MoE = 1.975\cdot \frac{0.92}{\sqrt{150} } \\\\MoE = 1.96\cdot 0.07512\\\\MoE = 0.14836\\\\[/tex]

So the required 95% confidence interval is

[tex]\text {confidence interval} = \bar{x} \pm MoE\\\\\text {confidence interval} = 72.7 \pm 0.14836\\\\\text {confidence interval} = 72.7 - 0.14836, \: 72.7 + 0.14836\\\\\text {confidence interval} = (72.552, \: 72.848)\\\\[/tex]

Therefore, we are 95% confident that actual average amount of time the entire population can hold their breath under water is within the range of (72.552, 72.848)

Answer:

He earns $2,100 in two weeks.

Step-by-step explanation:

We know that this street performers earn $60 per day at the Barclays center subway station, and that this earning represents 40% (or a proportion of 0.4) of his daily earnings. We can calculate his daily earnings as:

[tex]0.4D=\$\,60\\\\D=\dfrac{\$\,60}{0.4}=\$\,150[/tex]

If the daily earnings are $150, the earnings in 2 weeks (14 days) will be:

[tex]W=14\cdot\$\,150=\$\,2100[/tex]

If the area of ΔBAC = 24 in², the area of ΔEDF is 6 in².

If two triangles' angles are congruent and their corresponding sides are proportionate, they are considered similar. To put it another way, similar triangles are the same in shape but not necessarily in size. If ΔPQR and ΔMNO are two similar triangles, then we can write it as ΔPQR ∼ ΔMNO.

The square of the ratio of any pair of their respective sides is equal to the ratio of the areas of two similar triangles.

Since ΔBAC ∼ ΔEDF, we can use the above statement to find the area of ΔEDF. Let the area of ΔEDF be x in². Given that length of EF and BC is 2 in and 4 in respectively.

So, we have to solve this equation,

24/x = 4²/2²

Now, 24/x = 16/4

i.e. 24/x = 4

i.e. 4x = 24

i.e. x = 24/4 = 6

Therefore the area of ΔEDF is 6 in².

Learn more about similar triangles here -

https://brainly.com/question/16819417

#SPJ2

Answer:

4 - 7 = -3

-3 / 3 = -1

Answer:

P (subject had a positive test result or a negative test result) = 1

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

The table above

Required

P (subject had a positive test result or a negative test result)

This is calculated as follows;

P (subject had a positive test result or a negative test result) =

P (subject had a positive test result) + P (subject had a negative test result)

Calculating P (subject had a positive test result)

This can be calculated by number of subjects with positive results divided by 1000

Only data from the column of subjects with positive results will be considered.

Number of Subjects = Subjects that uses drugs + Subjects that do not use drugs

Number of subjects = 76 + 95

Number of Subjects = 171

P (Subject had a positive test Result) = 171/1000

Calculating P (subject had a negative test result)

This can be calculated by number of subjects with negative results divided by 1000

Only data from the column of subjects with negative results will be considered.

Number of Subjects = Subjects that uses drugs + Subjects that do not use drugs

Number of subjects = 6 + 823

Number of Subjects = 829

P (Subject had a negative test Result) = 829/1000

Hence, P (subject had a positive test result or a negative test result) =

P (subject had a positive test result) + P (subject had a negative test result) = 171/1000 + 829/1000

P (subject had a positive test result or a negative test result) = (171 + 829)/1000

P (subject had a positive test result or a negative test result) = 1000/1000

P (subject had a positive test result or a negative test result) = 1

Answer:

1) [tex] E(M) = 14*0.3 + 10*0.4 + 19*0.3 = 13.9 \%[/tex]

2) [tex]E(J)= 22*0.3 + 4*0.4 + 12*0.3 = 11.8 \%[/tex]

3) [tex] E(M^2) = 14^2*0.3 + 10^2*0.4 + 19^2*0.3 = 207.1 [/tex]

And the variance would be given by:

[tex]Var (M)= E(M^2) -[E(M)]^2 = 207.1 -(13.9^2)= 13.89[/tex]

And the deviation would be:

[tex] Sd(M) = \sqrt{13.89}= 3.73[/tex]

4) [tex] E(J^2) = 22^2*0.3 + 4^2*0.4 + 12^2*0.3 =194.8 [/tex]

And the variance would be given by:

[tex]Var (J)= E(J^2) -[E(J)]^2 = 194.8 -(11.8^2)= 55.56[/tex]

And the deviation would be:

[tex] Sd(M) = \sqrt{55.56}= 7.45[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

For this case we have the following distributions given:

Probability  M   J

0.3           14%  22%

0.4           10%    4%

0.3           19%    12%

Part 1

The expected value is given by this formula:

[tex] E(X)=\sum_{i=1}^n X_i P(X_i)[/tex]

And replacing we got:

[tex] E(M) = 14*0.3 + 10*0.4 + 19*0.3 = 13.9 \%[/tex]

Part 2

[tex]E(J)= 22*0.3 + 4*0.4 + 12*0.3 = 11.8 \%[/tex]

Part 3

We can calculate the second moment first with the following formula:

[tex] E(M^2) = 14^2*0.3 + 10^2*0.4 + 19^2*0.3 = 207.1 [/tex]

And the variance would be given by:

[tex]Var (M)= E(M^2) -[E(M)]^2 = 207.1 -(13.9^2)= 13.89[/tex]

And the deviation would be:

[tex] Sd(M) = \sqrt{13.89}= 3.73[/tex]

Part 4

We can calculate the second moment first with the following formula:

[tex] E(J^2) = 22^2*0.3 + 4^2*0.4 + 12^2*0.3 =194.8 [/tex]

And the variance would be given by:

[tex]Var (J)= E(J^2) -[E(J)]^2 = 194.8 -(11.8^2)= 55.56[/tex]

And the deviation would be:

[tex] Sd(M) = \sqrt{55.56}= 7.45[/tex]

The correct question is:

A circle has a radius of 45 units and is centered at (-2.4, -4.8).

What is the equation of this circle?

Answer:

Equation of the circle is;

(x + 2.4)² + (y + 4.8)² = 2304

Step-by-step explanation:

The standard equation of a circle is;

(x - a)² + (y - b)²  =  r²

where;

(a,b) is the center of the circle and r is the radius of the circle

Now, from the question, the circle is centered at (-2.4, -4.8) and the radius is 45

Thus, plugging those values into the standard form of equation of a circle, we have;

(x - (-2.4))²  +  (y - (-4.8))²  = 48²

This gives;

(x + 2.4)² + (y + 4.8)² = 2304

The question is incomplete! Complete question along with answer and step by step explanation is provided below.

Question:

Listed below are head injury measurements from small cars that were tested in crashes. The measurements are in​ "hic," which is a measurement of a standard​ "head injury​ criterion," (lower ​ "hic" values correspond to safer​ cars). The listed values correspond to cars​ A, B,​ C, D,​ E, F, and​ G, respectively.

514 541 302 400 507 406 369

Find the

a.​ mean,

b.​ median,

c.​ midrange,

d. mode for the data.

Also complete parts e. and f.

e. Which car appears to be the safest?

f. Based on these limited results, do small cars appear to have about the same risk of head injury in a crash?

Answer:

a) Mean = 434.14

b) Median = 406

c) Midrange = 421.5

d) Mode = 0

e) Car C appears to be the safest

f) The small cars does not appear to have about the same risk of head injury in a crash.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given the head injury measurements from small cars that were tested in crashes.

The measurements are in​ "hic," which is a measurement of a standard​ "head injury​ criterion.

The listed values are;

A = 514

B = 541

​C = 302

D = 400

​E = 507

F = 406

G = 369

a)​ Mean

The mean of the measurements is given by

Mean = Sum of measurements/ Number of measurements

Mean = (514 + 541 + 302 + 400 + 507 + 406 + 369)/7

Mean = 3039/7

Mean = 434.14

b)​ Median

Arrange the measurements in ascending order (low to high)

302, 369, 400, 406, 507, 514, 541

The median is given by

Median = (n + 1)/2

Median = (7 + 1)/2

Median = 8/2

Median = 4th

Therefore, the 4th measurement is the median that is 406

Median = 406

c)​ Mid-range

The midrange is given by

Midrange = (Max + Min)/2

The maximum measurement in the data set is 541

The minimum measurement in the data set is 302

Midrange = (541 + 302)/2

Midrange = 843/2

Midrange = 421.5

d)​ Mode for the data

The mode of the data set is the most repeated measurement.

302, 369, 400, 406, 507, 514, 541

In the given data set we don't have any repeated measurement therefore, there is no mode or we can say the mode of this data set is 0.

Mode = 0

e) Which car appears to be the safest?

Since we are given that the measurements are in​ "hic," which is a measurement of a standard​ "head injury​ criterion," (lower ​ "hic" values correspond to safer​ cars)

The lowest hic value corresponds to car C that is 302

Therefore, car C appears to be the safest among other cars.

f) Based on these limited results, do small cars appear to have about the same risk of head injury in a crash?

302, 369, 400, 406, 507, 514, 541

As you can notice, the hic values differ a lot from each other therefore, we can conclude that the small cars does not appear to have about the same risk of head injury in a crash.