Help me please, thank you very much.

Answer:

y= 2x +1

Step-by-step explanation:

Slope-intercept form

y= mx +c, where m is the gradient and c is the slope.

Since all the slope in the options are the same, let's focus on the y-intercept. From the graph, the line cuts through the y-axis at y= 1. Thus, the y- intercept is 1.

Hence, y= 2x +1 is the correct option.

Extra notes:

[tex]\boxed{ slope = \frac{y _{1} - y_2 }{x_1 - x_2} }[/tex]

Answer:

A' = (-4, 7)

B' = (3, 5)

C' = (1, 2)

Step-by-step explanation:

The question is asking you to translate the function by adding 4 to the x-value of each point and 2 to the y-value of each point.

I didn't double-check my math, but since the question is asking for an ordered pair, this should be correct.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

A + B = 90

A/6(15.25) = 3B/4

61A/18 = B

18A/18 + 61A/18 = 90

A = 90(18)/79

A = 20 40/79°

B = 90 -A = 69 39/79°

keeping in mind that perpendicular lines have negative reciprocal slopes, let's check for the slope of the equation above

[tex]\begin{array}{|c|ll} \cline{1-1} slope-intercept~form\\ \cline{1-1} \\ y=\underset{y-intercept}{\stackrel{slope\qquad }{\stackrel{\downarrow }{m}x+\underset{\uparrow }{b}}} \\\\ \cline{1-1} \end{array}\qquad \impliedby y=\stackrel{\stackrel{m}{\downarrow }}{\cfrac{1}{5}}x+7 \\\\[-0.35em] ~\dotfill[/tex]

[tex]\stackrel{\textit{perpendicular lines have \underline{negative reciprocal} slopes}} {\stackrel{slope}{\cfrac{1}{5}}\qquad \qquad \qquad \stackrel{reciprocal}{\cfrac{5}{1}}\qquad \stackrel{negative~reciprocal}{-\cfrac{5}{1}\implies -5}}[/tex]

so then line K has a slope of -5 and pass through (-1, -3)

[tex](\stackrel{x_1}{-1}~,~\stackrel{y_1}{-3})\qquad \qquad slope=m=-5 \\\\\\ \begin{array}{|c|ll} \cline{1-1} \textit{point-slope form}\\ \cline{1-1} \\ y-y_1=m(x-x_1) \\\\ \cline{1-1} \end{array}\implies y-\stackrel{y_1}{(-3)}=\stackrel{m}{-5}[x-\stackrel{x_1}{(-1)}] \\\\\\ y+3=-5(x+1)\implies y+3=-5x-5\implies y=-5x-8[/tex]

Answer:

See image

Step-by-step explanation:

This is to help you practice exponent rules. The rules are short cuts, which are good bc they're faster but bad bc they take away the meaning of the work. If you're trying to remember a rule, think through the meaning. See image.

So, "multiply exponents" and "product of powers" are basic two equivalent phrases! I think the answers on the image should work, but jic if not switch those two.

The Add exponents rule and Subtract are 100% correct.

The expressions are matched to the method needed to evaluate as shown below.

Expressions are mathematical statements which consist of two or more terms and terms are connected to each other using mathematical operators like addition, multiplication, subtraction and so on.

The first expression is 5³ × 5³.

Multiplication rule of exponents states that,

xᵃ × xᵇ = xᵃ⁺ᵇ

That is we add the exponents.

So, 5³ × 5³ = 5³⁺³ = 5⁶

The next expression is (7²)³.

We have the rule, (xᵃ)ᵇ = xᵃᵇ

So, here, multiply the exponents.

(7²)³ = 7⁶

(4x³)⁵

We can write it as,

(4x³)⁵ = 4⁵ . (x³)⁵

That is write is as product of the powers.

Division rule of exponents states that,

xᵃ / xᵇ = xᵃ⁻ᵇ

6⁹ / 6⁵ = 6⁹⁻⁵ = 6⁴

So, subtract the exponents.

Hence the expressions are matched.

Learn more about Exponents here :

https://brainly.com/question/5497425

#SPJ2

Answer:

P(X ≤ 46 | X~B(821, 0.078)) = 0.00885745584

0.00885... < 0.01

The test statistic of 46 is significant

There is sufficient evidence to reject H₀ and accept H₁

Air bags are more effective as protection than safety belts

Step-by-step explanation:

821 crashes

46 hospitalisations where car has air bags

7.8% or 0.078 probability of hospitalisations in cars with automatic safety belts

α = 0.01 or 1% ← level of significance

One-tailed test

We are testing whether hospitalisations in cars with air bags are less likely than in a car with automatic safety belts;

The likelihood of hospitalisation in a car with automatic safety belts, we are told, is 7.8% or 0.078;

So we are testing if hospitalisations in cars with air bags is less than 0.078;

So, firstly:

Let X be the continuous random variable, the number of hospitalisations from a car crash with equipped air bags

X~B(821, 0.078)

Null hypothesis (H₀): p = 0.078

Alternative hypothesis (H₁): p < 0.078

According to the information, we reject H₀ if:

P(X ≤ 46 | X~B(821, 0.078)) < 0.01

To find P(X ≤ 46) or equally P(X < 47), it could be quite long-winded to do manually for this particular scenario;

If you are interested, the manual process involves using the formula for every value of x up to and including 46, i.e. x = 0, x = 1, x = 2, etc. until x = 46, the formula is:

[tex]P(X = r) = nCr * p^{r} * (1 - p)^{n - r}[/tex]

You can find binomial distribution calculators online, where you input n (i.e. the number of trials or 821 in this case), probability (i.e. 0.078) and the test statistic (i.e. 46), it does it all for you, which gives:

P(X ≤ 46 | X~B(821, 0.078)) = 0.00885745584

Now, we need to consider if the condition for rejecting H₀ is met and recognise that:

0.00885... < 0.01

There is sufficient evidence to reject H₀ and accept H₁.

To explain what this means:

The test statistic of 46 is significant according to the 1% significance level, meaning the likelihood that only 46 hospitalisations are seen in car crashes with air bags in the car as compared to the expected number in car crashes with automatic safety belts is very unlikely, less than 1%, to be simply down to chance;

In other words, there is 99%+ probability that the lower number of hospitalisations in car crashes with air bags is due to some reason, such as air bags being more effective as a protective implement than the safety belts in car crashes.

Answer:

Slope (known as m) = -3/2; Y-int (known as b) = 3

Step-by-step explanation:

m = [tex]\frac{y_{2}-y_{1}}{x_{2}-x_{1}}[/tex]

m = [tex]\frac{{0}-{3}}{{2}-{0}}[/tex]

m = [tex]\frac{-3}{2}[/tex]

b = [tex]3[/tex]

[tex]-2(x+1) = -2+5\\\\\implies -2x -2 = 3\\\\\implies -2x = 3 +2 =5\\\\\implies x = - \dfrac 52[/tex]

Add the numbers, then add 2 to both sides of the equation. The solution would be x = - 5/2

Answer:

7,200 words

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: 4,800

I multiplied 120 by 20 because 60 divided by 3 is 20. Then I multiplied my answer by 2 because the question is asking how many words could they type in 2 hours

Answer: the answer is x=72

Step-by-step explanation:

Step 1: simplify both sides we know 15=x/4 -3 (the x holds a invisible 1)

the equation should look something Like: 15=1/4x-3 then FLIP the equation such as:

1/4x-3=15 then add 3 on both sides so 15+3=18

step 2: our equation is now 1/4x=18  (we see 4 is being divided the opposite of division is multiply) therefor multiply the 18 with 4

18*4=72 which means x=72

Answer:

  x → -∞, y → ∞

  x → ∞, y → -∞

Step-by-step explanation:

The function is odd degree with a negative leading coefficient. Its shape is generally down to the right (\). The end behavior will be ...

  x → -∞, y → ∞

  x → ∞, y → -∞

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

So the final answer is $2274.

Answer:

177146

Step-by-step explanation:

2 + 6 + 18 + 54 + 162 + 486 + 1458 + 4374 + 13122 + 39366 + 118098

Answer:

[tex]a=\frac{7}{3}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]\frac{a-1}{a-3}=\frac{a+1}{a-4}[/tex]

[tex](a-1)(a-4)=(a-3)(a+1)[/tex]

[tex]a^2-5a+4=a^2-2a-3[/tex]

[tex]-5a+4=-2a-3[/tex]

[tex]-3a+4=-3[/tex]

[tex]-3a=-7[/tex]

[tex]a=\frac{7}{3}[/tex]

Answer:

class C

Step-by-step explanation:

a=(17/25)=0.68

b=(13/20)=0.65

c=(7/10)=0.7

Answer:

X-intercept at (1/2 ,0)

domain of (0, infinity)

Vertical asymptote of x = 0

Step-by-step explanation:

Plato I got it right on the test

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The problem statement is not clear regarding which money is invested. We will assume it is the 80% of $8750 that is set aside for future education. That amount is

... 0.80 × $8750 = $7000

If x represents the amount invested at 7%, then the total interest earned is

... (7000 -x)×4% + (x)×7% = 420

... 280 +0.03x = 420

... x = 140/0.03 ≈ 4666.67

$4666.67 was invested at 7%.

$2333.33 was invested at 4%.

Answer:

Y Intercept: 0, 2.5

X Intercept: 3.5, 0

Explanation:

An Intercept is where a line crosses an axis. A Y Intercept is for the Y axis and the X intercept is for the X axis.

Also when writing coordinates, the x coordinate comes before the y one.

Hope this helps :)

Answer:

2nd answer choice

Step-by-step explanation:

We want to know which one does not have a two digit quotient, or answer. Let us use guess and check since there are only 4 options.

Option 1:

519/6=86 R3

This answer is wrong because it has a two digit quotient

Option 2:

915/7=130 R5

This answer is correct since it has a three digit quotient, but let's find the rest

Option 3:

439/7=62 R5

This answer is wrong because it has a two digit quotient

Option 4:

812/9=90 R2

This answer is wrong because it has a two digit quotient

Therefore option 2 is correct

I will like to know what you need help with?

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The second equation is y = -5x - 19

The first equation needs a little work

y - 9 = -5(x + 2)                                         Remove the brackets

y - 9 = -5x - 10                                          Add 9 to both sides.

y = -5x -10 + 9                                          Combine

y = - 5x - 1

There are two lines there. They are parallel, but they never cross. The y intercepts are not equal and they don't lie on top of each other.

Answer:

207+ 364 = 571

Step-by-step explanation:

i guess?._.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The slope- intercept form is:

We have:

The line is:

Answer:

156/12=13

so makes 13 dollars a hour

Hope This Helps!!!