How do I solve part b and c

Answer:

Step 3

Step-by-step explanation:

The mistake was made in Step 3.

Step 1: Subtract the wholes. 4 - 1 = 3

Step 2: Subtract the fractions. 5/6 - 3/6 = 2/6

After Step 2, He should have added them instead of subtracting them:

3 + 2/6 = 3 2/6

So, step 3 was his mistake.

Answer:step 3

Step-by-step explanation: he should have added

Answer: $264.54

Hope this helped! God bless!

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

12$

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Hello!

Given the variables

Y: family spending

X₁: income of a family

X₂: family size

X₃: additions to savings of a family

And the regression output (see attachment)

The population model is Y= α + β₁X₁ + β₂X₂ + β₃X₃

a)

To write the estimated regression equation of the relationship between the variables you have to use the information given in the regression output. Under the column "coefficients", the value that corresponds to "intercept" is the estimation of the y-intercept (a), the value under X₁ corresponds to the estimation for the slop for the variable "income of the family" (b₁), under X₂ is the estimation of the slope for the variable "family size" (b₂) and under X₃ is the estimation for the slope corresponding to the variable "additions to savings" (b₃)

The estimated regression equation is:

^Y= a + b₁X₁ + b₂X₂ + b₃X₃

^Y= 0.0136 + 0.7992X₁ + 0.2280X₂ -0.5796X₃

b)

Using the SS information you can calculate the coefficient of determination as:

SStotal= SSReg+SSError= 45.9634+2.6218= 48.5852

[tex]R^2= \frac{SS_{Reg}}{SS_{Total}} = \frac{45.9634}{(48.5852)} = 0.946[/tex]

R²= 94.6%

This means that 94.6% of the variability of the average family spending is explained jointly by the family income, the family size and the addition to saving under the estimated model ^Y= 0.0136 + 0.7992X₁ + 0.2280X₂ -0.5796X₃

c)

The hypotheses are:

H₀: β₁= β₂= β₃= 0

H₁: At least one βi≠0 ∀ i=1, 2, 3

α: 0.05

The statistic for the multiple regression is

[tex]F=\frac{MS_{Reg}}{MS_{Error}} ~~F_{Df_{Reg};Df_{Error}}[/tex]

[tex]MS_{Reg}= \frac{SS_{reg}}{Df_{Reg}}= \frac{45.9634}{3} = 15.32[/tex]

[tex]MS_{Error}= \frac{SS_{Error}}{Df_{Error}} = \frac{2.6218}{11} = 0.238[/tex]

[tex]F_{H_0}= \frac{MS_{Reg}}{MS_{Error}}= \frac{15.32}{0.238}= 64.37[/tex]

p-value  < .00001

At a 5% significance level, there is enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis. This means that the family income, family size and the addition to savings modify jointly the average spending of families.

d.

Individual tests:

There are two possible statistics to test the significance of each independent variable: [tex]t= \frac{b_i-\beta_i }{S_{b_i}} ~~t_{n-3}[/tex] ∀ i= 1, 2, 3, or [tex]F=\frac{MS_{X_i}}{MS_{Error}} ~F_{Df_{X_i}; Df_{Error\\}}[/tex]

Since the output doesn't give us the information of the individual ANOVA, you have to use the t-test (Df: n-3= 12-3= 9) for these hypotheses. Using the p-value approach. the decision rule for the three hypothesis will be:

If p-value ≤ α ⇒ Reject null hypothesis.

If p-value > α ⇒ Do not reject the null hypothesis.

1)

H₀: β₁ = 0

H₁: β₁ ≠ 0

α: 0.05

[tex]t_{H_0}= \frac{b_1-\beta_1 }{Sb_1}= \frac{0.7992-0}{0.074}= 10.8[/tex]

p-value < .00001 ⇒ Decision is to reject the null hypothesis.

2)

H₀: β₂ = 0

H₁: β₂ ≠ 0

α: 0.05

[tex]t_{H_0}= \frac{b_2-\beta_2 }{Sb_2}= \frac{0.2280-0}{0.190}= 1.2[/tex]

p-value: 0.260773 ⇒ The decision is to not reject the null hypothesis.

3)

H₀: β₃ = 0

H₁: β₃ ≠ 0

α: 0.05

[tex]t_{H_0}= \frac{b_3-\beta_3 }{Sb_3}= \frac{-0.5796-0}{0.920}= -0.63[/tex]

p-value: 0.544355 ⇒ The decision is to not reject the null hypothesis.

So, at a 5% significance level, it seems that the three independent variables influence jointly the variation on the average spending of the families, but looking at them separately, only the income of the families seems to affect their spending habits significantly while the family size or their addition to savings don't seem to have major effect over their spending habits.

I hope this helps!

Answer:

D

Step-by-step explanation:

shifting 4 units to the right means that the new root = old root + 4

what that means is that the equation must have a transformation such that it equates to 0 with the root being 4 larger.

the root/vertex for x^4 is at x=0

we want the root to be at x=4

so that means we can subtract 4 from x

and get (x-4)^4

Answer:

x = 27

Step-by-step explanation:

x/9 = 3

Multiply each side by 9

x/9 * 9 = 3*9

x = 27

Answer:

27

Step-by-step explanation:

x/9= 3

Carry over the 9 and make x the subject.

x= 3*9

x= 27

Therefore x is 27.

To check if the answer is correct, replace the x with the value of what it is in brackets. The value of x is 27.

(27)/9= 3

= 27/9

= 3

We got back the 3 so that means the answer is correct

Answer:

20:30 goes to 8:12

the rest goes to 6:18

Step-by-step explanation:

i may be wrong

Answer:

7:12 is equivalent to 6:18

20:30 is equivalent to 8:12

5:15 is equivalent to 6:18

Step-by-step explanation:

plz mark brainliest

Answer:

6.75 ft

Step-by-step explanation:

81 inches

We know there are 12 inches in 1 ft

81 inches * 1 ft/ 12 inches = 81/12 ft =6.75 ft

Answer:

  ΔA'B'C' is congruent to ΔABC

Step-by-step explanation:

See attached for the construction of ΔA'B'C'. (The vertices are labeled ABC.)

We computed angle B to be ...

  ∠B = 180° -∠A -∠C

  ∠B = 180° -103° -57° = 20°

We constructed segment BC of length 6.5. Then we constructed angles of 20° and 57° from B and C, respectively. The location where the rays from those angles cross is point A', and the angle there is 103°, as required.

__

ΔA'B'C' is congruent to ΔABC by the ASA congruence postulate.

Answer:

0.00420 is the answer

Step-by-step explanation:

The definition of sig figs is each of the digits of a number that are used to express it to the required degree of accuracy, starting from the first nonzero digit.

The rounding number of 0.004198223 to 3 significant figures is 0.0042

Here,

The number is 0.004198223.

We have to find,  0.004198223 to 3 significant figures.

What is Rounding number?

Rounding means making a number simpler but keeping its value close to what it was.

Here,

The number is 0.004198223.

To find 3 significant figures,

We round a number to three significant figures in the same way that we would round to three decimal places.

Then, We count from the first non-zero digit for three digits. We then round the last digit.

Here, the digit is 9 then it will be round.

We get, the number is;

0.0042

We fill in any remaining places to the right of the decimal point with zeros.

So, The rounding number of 0.004198223 to 3 significant figures is 0.00420

Learn more about the rounding number visit:

https://brainly.com/question/4896544

#SPJ2

Answer:

103.5

Step-by-step explanation:

Multiply x on both sides

xtan12 = 22

Now divide tan12 to isolate x

x = (22) / (tan(12))

Now we know that calculator should be in degree mode because the answer choices do not have the radian mode answer. When your calculator is in Degree mode and you calculate this value you get approximately 103.5

The value of x if tan 12 = 22/x is 103.5

Given the trigonometric expression:

tan 12 = 22/x

We need to get the value of "x"

Cross multiply

x tan12 = 22

x = 22/tan12

x = 22/0.2126

x = 103.529

Hence the value of x if tan 12 = 22/x is 103.5

Learn more here: https://brainly.com/question/25618616

Answer:

8

Step-by-step explanation:

just do the comparation

Vb : Vs

b for big and s for small

4/3 π rb³ : 4/3 π rs³ (since there are 4/3 and π on both side, we can eliminate them so)

Vb : Vs = rb³ : rs³

Vb : Vs = (2rs)³ : rs³

Vb : Vs = 8rs³ : rs³ (delete the r³ on both side)

Vb : Vs = 8 : 1

so Vb is 8 times larger in volume than the small one

Answer:

all reals

Step-by-step explanation:

all reals as |x| >= 0 for every x real

so |x| > -9 is always true

Answer:

11 1/4

Step-by-step explanation:

first make the fractions equal. So 9 1/6 would be 9 2/12 so that we canadd them together.

9 2/12 + 2 1/12 = 11 3/12

but u can simplify the answer so itll be 11 1/4

[tex]answer = 11 \ \frac{3}{12} \\ solution \\ 9 \ \frac{1}{6} + 2 \ \frac{1}{12} \\ = \frac{55}{6} + \frac{25}{12} \\ = \frac{55 \times 2 + 25}{12} \\ = \frac{110 + 25}{12} \\ = \frac{135}{12} \\ = 11 \ \ \frac{3}{12} \\ hope \: it \: helps[/tex]

Answer:

-8y +8v +24

Step-by-step explanation:

-8(y-v-3)

Multiply each term inside the parentheses by -8

-8y -v*-8 -3*-8

-8y +8v +24

___________________________________

Hey!!!

solution,

-8(y-v-3)

= -8y+8v+24

_________________________________

Here,

You have to remember these things:

Hope it helps.

Good luck on your assignment

By rounding of the following number to the nearest thousand is 2000.

Rounding some number to a specific value is making its value simpler (therefore losing accuracy), mostly done for better readability or accessibility.

'

Rounding to some place keeps it accurate on the left side of that place but rounded or sort of like trimmed from the right in terms of exact digits.

Round the following number to the nearest thousand

2385

= 2000

Thus, by rounding of the following number to the nearest thousand is 2000.

Learn more about rounding numbers here:

https://brainly.com/question/1285054

#SPJ2

Answer:

(a) P(CBM) = 0.07

(b) P(not CBW) = 0.996

(c ) P(neither is color-blind) = 0.926

(d) P=(at least one is color-blind) = 0.074

Step-by-step explanation:

The correct data is  that Approximately 7% of American men and 0.4% of American women are red-green color-blind.

(a) Probability that he is red-green color-blind:

[tex]P(CBM) = 0.07[/tex]

(b) Probability that she is NOT red-green color-blind:

[tex]P(not\ CBW) =1- P(CBW)\\P(not\ CBW) = 1 -0.004\\P(not\ CBW) =0.996[/tex]

(c) Probability that neither are red-green color-blind

[tex]P(neither) = P(not\ CBW)*P(not\ CBM) \\P(neither) = 0.996 *(1-0.07)\\P(neither)=0.926[/tex]

(d) Probability that at least one of them is red-green color-blind

[tex]P(at\ least\ one) = 1- P(neither) \\P(at\ least\ one) = 1-0.926\\P(at\ least\ one) = 0.074[/tex]

Answer:

We can eliminate the second and third options because marking something up doesn't result in a number less than the original. Since we are told to select 3 options and there are 3 answer choices left we select the first, fourth, and fifth statements.

Answer:

0.699

Step-by-step explanation:

got it on khan academy, should get brainliest thanks

Answer:

12.0

Step-by-step explanation:

d(pi)=37.7

d=12.0

Answer:

there are 86,400 seconds in one day

Answer:

C.

Step-by-step explanation:

There are 16 ounces in a pint. 8 * 16 = 128

Answer:

hes lyin prolly

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Protista

Step-by-step explanation:

Archaebacteria.

Eubacteria.

Protista.

Fungi.

Plantae.

Animalia.

These are the 6 kingdoms

Answer:

= 19300

Step-by-step explanation:

Each claim consists of two parts = X + Y

where

X = the benefit that is paid to the surgeon and

Y = benefit that is paid to the hospital

V(X) = 5000, V(Y) = 10000 and V(X+Y) = 17000

So V(X+Y) = V(X) + V(Y) + 2cov(X,Y)

17000 = 5000 + 10000 +2 cov(X,Y)

17000 -15000 = 2cov(X,Y)

2000 = 2cov(X,Y)

cov(X,Y) = 1000

Now X is increased by flat Rs. 100 per claim and Y by 10% per claim

total benefit = X+100+Y+0.1Y = X+100 + 1.1Y

V(total benefit) = V(X) + 1.1²V(Y) +2(1.1)cov(X,Y) [ V(aX+bY)

= a²V(X) +b²V(Y) +2abcov(X,Y) and V(X+c) = V(X)]

= 5000 + (1.21*10000) + (2.2*1000)

= 5000 + 12100 + 2200

= 19300

Answer:

0.0178

Step-by-step explanation:

For computation of probability that all fourteen bets lose first we need to find out the Probability of losing in 1 bet is shown below:-

Probability of losing in 1 bet = 1 - P(winning)

= 1 - 0.25

= 0.75

With the help of probability of losing in 1 bet we can find out the Probability of losing in 8 bets which is here below:-

= Probability of losing in 1 bet ^ Number of loosing bets

= 0.75 ^ 14

= 0.017817948

or

= 0.0178

Therefore for computing the probability that all fourteen bets lose we simply applied the above formula.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

a. Two methods of fund raising is being tested here in the first case study. To make a completely randomized experiment. I would use and randomly assign half the population of the 1000 donor sample that will be sent literature about the successful activities of the charity and asked to make another donation to one of the two treatment conditions: which is a sent literature about the successful activities of the charity. While the placebo group would be the other 500 donors contacted by phone and asked to make another donation with no influence whatever from the charity.

b. For the second case study, To make a completely randomized experiment. I would use and randomly assign 43 particupants which are to be given a gel that contains the tooth-whitening chemicals to the treatment condition containing the tooth-whitening chemicals while the placebo group would be the remaining 42 which are to be given a similar-looking package of gel that does not contain the tooth-whitening chemicals.

c. Using three blocks: the completely randomized design experiment would be:

Donors younger than 30 years old:

Sent literature: Yes No

Contact by phone: Yes No

Donors 30 to 59 years old:

Sent literature: Yes No

Contact by phone: Yes No

Donors 60 and older:

Sent literature: Yes No

Contact by phone: Yes No

(Yes means yes to another donation and No means no to another donation)

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

a. Two methods of fund raising is being tested here in the first case study. To make a completely randomized experiment. I would use and randomly assign half the population of the 1000 donor sample that will be sent literature about the successful activities of the charity and asked to make another donation to one of the two treatment conditions: which is a sent literature about the successful activities of the charity. While the placebo group would be the other 500 donors contacted by phone and asked to make another donation with no influence whatever from the charity.

b. For the second case study, To make a completely randomized experiment. I would use and randomly assign 43 particupants which are to be given a gel that contains the tooth-whitening chemicals to the treatment condition containing the tooth-whitening chemicals while the placebo group would be the remaining 42 which are to be given a similar-looking package of gel that does not contain the tooth-whitening chemicals.

c. Using three blocks: the completely randomized design experiment would be:

Donors younger than 30 years old:

Sent literature: Yes No

Contact by phone: Yes No

Donors 30 to 59 years old:

Sent literature: Yes No

Contact by phone: Yes No

Donors 60 and older:

Sent literature: Yes No

Contact by phone: Yes No

(Yes means yes to another donation and No means no to another donation)

Answer:

1) 48 years.

2) Question incorrect.

11 isn't a factor of 64, and 368 isn't a multiple of 64. 11 also isn't a factor of 368, hence, it would be impossible to find the unknown second number with all of these false information in the question.

Step-by-step explanation:

Let the ages of Kissi, Esinam and Lariba be x, y and z respectively.

Ratio of the ages of Kissi and Esinam is 3:5

x:y = 3:5

(x/y) = (3/5)

5x = 3y

x = (3y/5) (eqn 1)

Ratio of the ages of Esinam and Lariba is 3:5

y:z = 3:5

(y/z) = (3/5)

5y = 3z

z = (5y/3) (eqn 2)

The sum of their 3 ages is 147

x + y + z = 147 (eqn 3)

Substituting the values of x and z from eqn 1 and 2 into eqn 3, we have

(3y/5) + y + (5y/3) = 147

(49y/15) = 147

y = (147×15/49) = 45.

x = (3y/5) = (3×45/5) = 27

z = (5y/3) = (5×45/3) = 75

The ages of Kissi, Esinam and Lariba are then 27, 45 and 75 respectively.

The difference in the ages of the oldest amf the youngest is thus, 75 - 27 = 48 years.

2) This question seems to be faulty and incorrect as 11 isn't a factor of 64, and 368 isn't a multiple of 64. 11 also isn't a factor of 368, hence, it would be impossible to find the unknown second number with all of these false information in the question.

Hope this Helps!!!

Answer:

x(2x+3)

Step-by-step explanation:

Im guessing 2x2 is 2x^2

2x^2 + 3x = 0

x(2x+3)

Answer:

48

Step-by-step explanation:

Esinam shere a common ratio hence,

the lcm of 3 and 5 is 15

Kissi:Esinam= 9:15 and Esinam:Lariba=15:25

Combining; 9:15:25

Let x be the ages such that,

Kissi=9x and Esinam=15x and Lariba=25x

9x+15x+25x=147

49x=147

x=3

Youngest; Kissi=9x=9(3)=27

Oldest; Lariba=25x=25(3)=75

Difference 75-27=48