if you have an accident, the law requires you to exchange your drivers license information with Security guards
How to avoid accident?Around the world, the 4 E's—education, enforcement, engineering, environment, and emergency care for victims of traffic accidents—have been the main focus of accident prevention and control. Drive according to the posted speed restrictions on the different roads. Keep in mind that "speed thrills but kills."Before operating a bicycle, motorcycle, or car, always wear seat belts, helmets, and other safety gear. Overspeeding, reckless driving, breaking the law, misreading traffic signs, being tired, and drinking are all examples of driver error. Pedestrian: Ignorance, erroneous crossings, traveling on the carriageway, and jaywalkers.The law mandates that you give security personnel information from your driver's license in the event of an accident.
To learn more about avoid accident refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/24622288
#SPJ4
Which of the following is not one of the goals of the modern criminal justice system?
a. to control crime
b. to enforce society's shared moral code
c. to provide and maintain justice
d. to prevent crime
To enforce society's shared moral code is not one of the goals of the modern criminal justice system.
The correct answer is Option B.
One of the primary reasons for the existence of any criminal justice system lies in the goal of maintaining justice and peace in the society.
The justice system seeks to convict a wrongdoer and punish him/her for the actions that caused harm to another party.
By imposing such a punishment, the victim gains a sense of satisfaction, loosely termed, or justice for the wrong done to her.
The term "criminal justice" refers to the governmental organisations in charge of upholding the law, deciding cases of criminal activity, and punishing offenders.
The criminal justice system is fundamentally a tool for social control since society views some behaviours as so harmful and hazardous that it either carefully regulates their use or outright forbids them.
To know more about criminal justice system, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/28784358
#SPJ4
_____ are the broad and enduring purposes for which the Services and the Combatant commands (or CCMDs) were established by law.
Roles are the broad and enduring purposes for which the Services and the Combatant commands (or CCMDs) were established by law.
A combatant command, sometimes known as a unified combatant command (CCMD), is a combined military command of the United States Department of Defense that is made up of forces from two or more service branches of the United States Armed Forces and carries out extensive and ongoing operations. Currently, there are 11 unified combatant commands, each of which is the top tier of military commands and is responsible for providing effective command and control of all U.S. military forces, regardless of branch of service, in times of peace or conflict. Unified combatant commands are set up either geographically (under the term "area of responsibility," or AOR) or functionally, for example, in the areas of special operations, force projection, transport, and cybersecurity.
Learn more about Combatant commands here
https://brainly.com/question/17205679
#SPJ4
Directions: Read about Necessity on page 40 of your textbook, then read the scenario and answer the question.
Fawn is driving home from work and has to go through an area where there is a school. She stops at a stop sign and sees another car approaching a stop sign. She scans the area and sees students approaching the intersection. As she starts to go through several students run into the street and Fawn swerves to avoid them. The other driver runs the stop sign and Fawn hits the car. If Fawn is charged with a crime can she raise the defense of necessity? Explain
______________________________________________________________________
The affirmative defense of necessity bars the prosecution of the defendant if it is established.
When is it appropriate to assert a necessity defense?These components are often present in a defense of duress: The performer is immediately in danger of dying or suffering grave physical harm. The only plausible option for the actor to get away is to commit the illegal act.
Shoving someone off of another person when they were threatening to kill that person would be an illustration of need. The shoving is justified as necessary because it does less harm than killing would.
When an action cannot be avoided and it is justifiable because it will stop a more significant harm from happening, it is a defense to culpability for unlawful actions.
To learn more about necessity defense refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/29893642
#SPJ1
Fawn cannot raise the defense of necessity if she is charged with a crime.
If Fawn is charged with a crime can she raise the defense of necessity?No, Fawn cannot raise the defense of necessity.The defense of necessity requires the accused to prove that the harm caused was less than the harm avoided by breaking the law.In this situation, Fawn avoided hitting the students by swerving and hitting the other car, but this is still an illegal act and does not constitute a defense of necessity.Necessity is a legal defense that is available in some criminal cases and is based on the idea that the defendant had no other reasonable choice but to commit the crime in order to prevent a greater harm from occurring.In order for Fawn to use the defense, she must show that the harm she was trying to prevent was greater than the harm caused by the crime she committed.In this case, Fawn swerved to avoid the students, which caused her to hit the other car. While Fawn’s intention was to prevent a greater harm from occurring, the harm she caused was greater than the harm she was trying to prevent, as she caused property damage and potentially physical harm by hitting the other car.Therefore, Fawn cannot use the defense of necessity if she is charged with a crime.The defense of necessity is a type of excuse defense.To learn more about The defense of necessity refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/30021859
#SPJ1
a life insurance policy would be considered a wagering contract without
A life insurance policy would be considered a wagering contract without
insurable interest.
A life insurance policy would be regarded as a betting contract if it did not have insurable interest. Due to the fact that one party makes a guarantee that the other party can only accept by performing a Q, life and health insurance plans are regarded as unilateral contracts. Statements included in a warranty are taken to be true literally. Even if made inadvertently, a warranty that is not absolutely accurate in every way is enough to invalidate a policy. Business partners E and F. "conditional". Insurance contracts are known to as conditional because specific upcoming events or actions must take place before any claims may be paid.
To know more about known refer :
brainly.com/question/30004401
#SPJ4
a registered representative recently had a child and is moving into a larger home. the representative must disclose this change in residential address on her form u4 within
The registered representative must disclose the change in their residential address on their Form U4 within 30 days of the change.
Form U4 is a form that registered representatives must file with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) when they first register with a broker-dealer and when they experience certain changes in their employment status or personal information.
A change of residential address is considered a "material change" and must be reported on Form U4 within 30 days of the change. This is to ensure that the representative's contact information is up-to-date and that FINRA can communicate with the representative effectively.
To learn more about FINRA imposed at
https://brainly.com/question/30205850?referrer=searchResults
#SPJ4
The next most palpable defect of the subsisting Confederation, is the total want of a SANCTION to its laws. The United States, as now composed, have no powers to exact obedience, or punish disobedience to their resolutions, either by pecuniary [fines], by a suspension or divestiture of privileges, or by any other constitutional mode. There is no express delegation of authority to them to use force against delinquent members; and if such a right should be ascribed to the federal head, as resulting from the nature of the social compact between the States, it must be by inference and construction... There is, doubtless, a striking absurdity in supposing that a right of this kind does not exist. . .Alexander Hamilton, The Federalist 21Based on The Federalist 21, which of the following arguments about government would Hamilton likely agree with?
Hamilton would probably agree with the following arguments about governance that national laws should, in reality, take precedence over state laws.
The idea that such a right doesn't exist is undoubtedly a startling folly. The Federalist by Alexander Hamilton. on page 21 of The Federalist. The absolute absence of a SANCTION to its rules is the second most obvious flaw in the current Confederation.
As currently constituted, the United States lacks the authority to demand compliance with their resolutions or to penalise disobedience through monetary [fines], the suspension or loss of privileges, or any other legal means. They are not explicitly given the right to use force against unruly members.
Learn more about Confederation Visit: brainly.com/question/28386696
#SPJ4
Which of the following is an example of a power exclusively granted to the Senate in Article II of the Constitution?A Declaring warB Overriding a presidential veto with a two-thirds majority vetoC Confirming ambassadorsD Creating spending bills
Confirming ambassadors is an example of a power exclusively granted to the Senate in Article II of the Constitution
What's in an ambassador?A country or international organization's highest-ranking representative abroad is an ambassador. A strong leader who is also a competent manager, tenacious negotiator, and a well-liked American envoy are all necessary qualities for an effective ambassador.United States ambassadors perform more than standard diplomatic duties due to the country's position in the world and function as a power broker. An ambassador commands a great deal of respect and status as the president's principal representative to a foreign country or body like the United Nations."The President shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate to make Treaties, if two thirds of the Senators present consent," the Constitution states in Article II, Section 2, paragraph 2. Thus, the President and the Senate each have a portion of the authority to make treaties.To learn more about ambassador refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/870924
#SPJ4
it is an assertion of authority by a peace officer that would cause a reasonable person to believe they are not free to leave. a/an same answer is limited in scope, intensity, and duration. it is less than an arrest and more substantial than a consensual encounter. *
An assertion of power by a peace officer that would lead a reasonable person to believe they are not free to depart is considered a temporary detention or stop.
Superintendent: It is up to you to decide whether to grant a second, potentially three-month bail period. District/Branch Commanders: You are in charge of overseeing investigations in when a suspect has been released on police bail or while being investigated.
No one should be subjected to torture or other cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment while in any form of detention or incarceration, and no cause whatsoever shall be cited as a defense for such treatment or punishment.
Learn more about authority Visit: brainly.com/question/28067297
#SPJ4
when it comes to people who engage in criminal behavior, based on definitions of the bas and bis system, which of the following do you believe is true?
The behavioural activation/approach system (BAS) is an appetitive-motivational system that is triggered by approach behavior and conditioned signals of reward or non-punishment.
What are BAS and BIS and how are they related to personality traits?An appetitive-motivational mechanism called the behavioural activation/approach system (BAS) is triggered by the consumption of rewards and conditioned signals of reward or non-punishment.
It is thought that an approach system known as the behavioral approach system (BAS) controls appetitive motives, which are motivated by a desire to advance toward a desired outcome. According to this theory, aversive motives, in which the objective is to avoid unpleasant stimuli, are regulated by a behavioral avoidance (or inhibition) system (BIS).
When conditioned cues linked to punishment or the cessation of a reward are presented, the BIS reacts, leading to behavioral withdrawal and arousal. Behavior shifts and arousal occur as a result of BAS's reaction to cues that are linked to rewards or the cessation of punishment.
To learn more about behavioral approach system refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/28145460
#SPJ4
If you could remove from the Texa criminal code, what law would you remove and why?
I would remove "False report to peace officer" law from Texas criminal code because it is punishable by up to 180 days in jail and a fine up to $2,000 and discourages people to file reports and doubt the police.
The False Report to Peace Officer law from the Texas criminal code should be removed due to its disproportionate punishments and its potential to discourage citizens from filing reports or expressing doubt in the police. Under the current law, the penalty for filing a false report can be up to 180 days in jail and a fine of up to $2,000.
These severe penalties have the potential to create a hostile relationship between citizens and police, as individuals may be discouraged from filing reports out of fear of punishment or doubt in the police. For these reasons, it is essential to remove this law in order to ensure that citizens can feel safe filing reports and expressing their concerns.
To know more about Texas, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/29991787
#SPJ4
Roger Boisjoly provided a Presidential commission with documents supporting his hypothesis about how the cold temperature had causes the failure of an O-ring on the Space Shuttle Challenger. For this action, Boisjoly was labeled aHeroGood SamaritanWhistleblower
An O-ring seal that malfunctioned due to the exceptionally cold circumstances was to blame for the catastrophe.
How weather caused the loss of the Space Shuttle Challenger?O-ring seal malfunctioned during the exceptionally cold temperatures, which led to the catastrophe. The low temperature behind a powerful cold front was a chilly 26 degrees, far lower than the typical low temperature of 50 degrees. The previous evening, preparations were conducted to stop or lessen the production of ice.
The commission came to the conclusion that the Challenger accident's immediate cause was a failure in the O-rings sealing the aft field joint on the right solid rocket booster, which allowed pressurized hot gases and eventually flame to "blow by" the O-ring and come into contact with the nearby external tank, leading to structural failure.
To learn more about Space Shuttle Challenger refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/27078190
#SPJ4
first in time, first in right generally gives the first lender a priority lien position, the exception being a
First in space, first in time offers the initial lender a priority lien position in most cases, with the exception of an unpaid real estate tax.
The Dutch real estate transfer tax is 2% of the purchase price when buying a home in the Netherlands. As a result, if you spend EUR 200,000 on a Dutch house, for instance, you'll have to pay EUR 12,000 in Dutch real estate transfer tax. If so, you must annually pay Onroerendezaak be lasting, often known as OZB (property tax). Your municipality is responsible for collecting the property tax, which is a type of local taxes. The sum is established by the municipality. With a vast array of tax agreements, a low corporate income tax rate, and a full participation exemption for capital gains and earnings, the Netherlands has it all. The Netherlands is one of the most open economies in the world for multinational firms thanks to these qualities and a favorable tax environment (MNCs).
Learn more about real estate tax here
https://brainly.com/question/28605893
#SPJ4
First in time first in right generally gives the first mortgage lender a priority lien position the only exception being:
how did the english bill of rights expand the rights of common englishmen
The English Bill of Rights introduced a constitutional monarchy, where the king or queen is the head of state but is subject to legislative restraints.
That the people who are Protestant may possess weapons for their defense suited to their situations and as allowed by the law. The Common Englishmen had the chance to carry guns for defense in occasions where it applied. It strengthened the liberty of common Englishmen by allowing them to carry weapons. Because it allowed them to carry weapons, it offered common Englishmen more freedom. This first Act of the English Parliament has always been in the care of Parliament. The Bill established parliamentary rules, or the right to free expression, free elections, and regular legislative with no restrictions. Additionally, it protects citizens from political intervention, grants them the ability to complain to the government, forbids the imposition of taxes without the approval of Parliament, and ensures that the courts will treat litigants fairly.
Learn more about Englishmen here
https://brainly.com/question/13890092
#SPJ4
if an insane person who has not been adjudged insane enters into a contract, the contract is non-voidable by the insane person.TrueFalse
A contract signed by someone who has been deemed mad is invalid. being crazy without being declared mad by a court or administrative body.
Which of the following is true of a contract with an adjudged insane person?A person who has been deemed mad cannot enter into a contract. not having had one's insanity determined by a court or other official body. Such a person often renders voidable any deal they enter into. It is an invalid contract in some states.
A person who has been declared mad cannot enter into a contract. Consequently, there isn't a contract. Only the court-appointed guardian is permitted by law to sign contracts on behalf of a person who has been determined to be crazy.
A person who has been deemed mad cannot enter into a contract. If a person has a mental condition that qualifies him or her as legally insane but no formal determination of their sanity has been made that person is insane, yet they have not yet been found to be insane. The mad person can void the agreement.
To learn more about contract refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/17185606
#SPJ4
Which of the following policies would the states most likely prefer according to the political cartoon?a. Federal mandatesb. Regulatory preemptionc. Block grantsd. Categorical grants
Block grants is the most likely policy that states would prefer according to the political cartoon.
The correct option is Option C.
According to the cartoon, block grants give money to states with less federal oversight, which is appealing to states.
A block grant is a yearly quantity of money given by the federal government to a state or local government organization to assist in funding a particular project or programme.
This kind of federal money is frequently connected to assisting with social welfare initiatives including Medicaid, public housing, education, and job training.
Since the 1950s, block grants have been used in some capacity. The majority have helped fund initiatives for community development, public health, or social services.
Block grants were created to fund these services with a minimum of restrictions, enabling local governments to administer and manage the programmes.
To know more about block grants, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/17770080
#SPJ4
What is law of segregation of gametes?.
According to Mendel's law of segregation, "each gene isolates from each other during the production of gametes, resulting in each gamete carrying the only allele for each gene."
The second inheritance law is the law of segregation. Each gamete produced by an organism has a single gene copy that is chosen at random. This is referred to as the segregation law. The genotypes (allele combos) and phenotypes (visible traits) of progeny from genetic crossings can be predicted using a Punnett square. The law of segregation states that each gametophyte (egg or sperm cell) that an organism produces receives each of the two gene copies that are present in the organism, and that the distribution of the genes found is random.
To know more about Mendel's law of segregation:
https://brainly.com/question/23067535
#SPJ4
what percentage of congress is needed to override a presidential veto
When the President issues a regular veto, the bill is sent back to the house where it was first introduced, usually with a note explaining the president's position. The only way to override this veto is with a two-thirds majority in both the Senate and the House.
The Senate is the upper house of the Netherlands' States General, which serves as the country's legislature. Every four years, within three months of the provincial elections, its 75 members are chosen from lists by the electors of the twelve States-Provincial and four electoral colleges for the Senate. Depending on their population, each province and college has a distinct electoral weight. Members of the Senate are frequently multi-tasking, veteran, or part-time national legislators. They are given a stipend that is roughly equal to a fifth of the lower house members' salaries. It meets just once a week, as opposed to the more important House of Representatives from a political standpoint. Members of the Senate are frequently multi-tasking, veteran, or part-time national legislators. They are given a stipend that is roughly equal to a fifth of the lower house members' salaries. It meets just once a week, as opposed to the more important House of Representatives from a political standpoint.
Learn more about Senate here
https://brainly.com/question/26823952
#SPJ4
A farmer owned a farm in joint tenancy with his sister. The farmer lived on the farm; his sister lived elsewhere. The farmer took out a loan from a bank in order to build a stable on the farm. The farmer executed a promissory note in favor of the bank. The farmer also granted the bank a mortgage on his interest in the farm. After a stable was constructed, the farmer defaulted on the loan and died shortly thereafter.If a court refuses to enforce the bank's mortgage by ordering a foreclosure sale with respect to the farmer's interest in the farm, which of the following has likely been adopted by the applicable jurisdiction?
Mortgage grant does not separate title, according to lien theory of law.
What has likely been adopted by the applicable jurisdiction?Due to her right of survivorship, the farmer's sister in such a jurisdiction succeeded to the farm following the farmer's death, ending his interest in it. The bank no longer held an enforceable mortgage on the farm since she refused to provide it one (COURT REFUSED BECAUSE NO MORTGAGE INTEREST TRANSFERRED). According to the exoneration of liens theory, the devisee of real estate that is subject to a lien (such as a mortgage) may request that the debt be paid off (or "exonerated") with the help of other assets in the decedent's estate. It has no bearing on the bank's rights.Mortgage grant does not separate title, according to lien theory of law.To learn more about liens theory refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/14849774
#SPJ4
o conveys a life estate to a, with a remainder to b. if during a's lifetime, x enters into actual, exclusive possession that is open and notorious and hostile for the statutory period, will x obtain title to the land?
If, during A's lifetime, X takes real, exclusive possession of the property that is hostile, open, and notorious for the required amount of time, X will not receive title to the property instead acquiring A's life estate.
A landowner is prohibited from suing for ejectment if she doesn't file an action to evict a potential adverse possessor before the statute of limitations runs out, and title passes to the possessor instead. But until her interest becomes possessory, the statute of limitations does not apply to the owner of a future interest (such as a remnant or reversion).
The past present estate must expire before the future interest holder has the right to possession, and until then, there is no cause of action for ejectment. In this case, X will receive A's life estate by adverse possession (i.e., a life estate pur autre vie, calculated based on A's life), but not B's remainder, which is still nonpossessory.
Read more about exclusive possession at
https://brainly.com/question/28474035
#SPJ4
true/false. justices on the supreme court take seriously their duty to interpret laws and the constitution as fairly and accurately as possible. despite this, explain how sharp disagreements can occur on the supreme court about how race can be used in school assignment plans.
Answer:
t
Explanation:
In the event that a man died without a son, a _____, a brother or next of kin, redeemed the dead man's property and married his widow.
relative
friend
redeemer
In the event that a man died without a son, a redeemer, a brother or next of kin, redeemed the dead man's property and married his widow. A Christian notion is a kinsman redeemer.
A male relative known as a "kinsman-redeemer" has the obligation to offer assistance to another male family member who is in peril or otherwise in need. Ruth, a biblical figure who lost her husband and was made to work for crumbs, At this point, a kinsman redeemer's function entered the scene. In the ancient world, it was difficult for women to find work that would support them. After seeing her state of helplessness, Boaz decides that it is his responsibility as the kinsman-redeemer to care for her and makes a marriage proposal. Such a kinsman redeemer also has the duty to exact revenge if the kin has been killed. It goes much beyond that.
To know more about Christianity:
brainly.com/question/3749222
#SPJ4
the equal protection standard is generally judged in a lenient manner. however, laws that discriminate regarding are made to undergo a much more rigorous test.
The equal protection standard is generally judged in a lenient manner. However, laws that discriminate regarding race are made to undergo a much more rigorous test.
What is equal protection standard?According to the principle of equal protection, no one may be denied the same access to the legal system. A person must be treated equally to others in comparable situations by the state's governing body. In addition, no state may take away someone's life, liberty, or property without providing them with a fair trial or deny them the equal protection of the law if they are a resident of its territory. No State shall pass or enforce any legislation that restricts the rights or privileges of US citizens.The government is prohibited from enacting laws or adopting official measures that differ in how they treat individuals in identical situations or groups of individuals under the equal protection clause of the constitution.
To learn more about equal protection standard refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/28474671
#SPJ4
what are some alternative dispute resolution techniques
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) refers to methods of resolving disputes outside of the traditional courtroom setting.
What are some common ADR techniques?Mediation: This is a process where a neutral third party, known as a mediator, helps the parties involved in the dispute to reach a mutually acceptable resolution.Arbitration: This is a process where a neutral third party, known as an arbitrator, listens to both sides of the dispute and makes a binding decision.Conciliation: This is a process where a neutral third party, known as a conciliator, helps the parties to reach an amicable resolution by fostering communication and understanding.Collaborative law: This is a process where the parties and their lawyers work together to reach a settlement without going to court.Mini-trial: This is a process where the parties present their case to a neutral third party, such as a retired judge, who then makes a non-binding recommendation for a resolution.Early neutral evaluation: This is a process where a neutral third party, such as a retired judge or experienced attorney, evaluates the case and provides an non-binding assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of each party's position.In summary, Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) are methods of resolving disputes outside of the traditional courtroom setting. Some common ADR techniques include Mediation, Arbitration, Conciliation, Collaborative law, Mini-trial and Early neutral evaluation. These methods are designed to provide a more efficient, less formal and less adversarial way to resolve disputes.To learn more about ADR refer:
brainly.com/question/23842872
#SPJ4
can you anonymously report someone to immigration online?
The answer is Yes, you can anonymously report someone to immigration online. We take all reports of suspicious activity seriously and you can choose to remain anonymous.
Reporting online includes following online steps:
Discover and gather as much information as you can regarding your reports.Then stablish private internet connection to connect with.Then go to ICE website (Immigration and Customs Enforcement)Fill and complete the Homeland security investigation (HSI) tip form.And lastly submit your tip and make a digital copy of your report for your own records.Note: Don't provide wrong or false information to harass someone for your own wrong intentions.
To know more about ICE website:
brainly.com/question/29847417
#SPJ4
1. The Supreme Court decided that (select 2 of the following answer options): a. The search was unconstitutional. B. A warrant was required for regulatory inspections of gun dealers. C. The appellate court ruling should be overturned. D. Biswell's consent is required for the search to be constitutional. E. Regulatory inspections for gun sale violations do not create privacy issues
The correct response is B. A warrant was required for regulatory inspections of gun dealers.
A warrant is a legal document that gives authorization for someone to do something, particularly one that is approved by a judge or magistrate and enables the police to make an arrest or search a person's home. There is a warrant out for his arrest, according to the police. The premise on which the allegation and the supporting evidence are based is the warrant. The warrant also provides an explanation of how the information supports the claim. The judge must then issue the warrant, which must essentially take the form specified by the Rules; search warrants must be issued in duplicate. If the judge is then convinced that the facts supporting the application are true, or that there is reasonable grounds to believe that they are, he must do so.
Learn more about warrant here
https://brainly.com/question/12863886
#SPJ4
All of the following are elements of an insurance policy EXCEPT? A. definitions. B. other insurance. C. claim forms. D. conditions
Answer: B. other insurance
An insurance policy typically includes the following elements:
A. definitions: This section defines key terms and concepts used in the policy.
C. claim forms: This section outlines the procedures and requirements for submitting claims under the policy.
D. conditions: This section sets out the terms and conditions of the policy, including the rights and obligations of the policyholder and the insurer.
Other insurance is not considered as one of the elements of an insurance policy, but rather it's a clause that is used to coordinate coverage when an insured has multiple insurance policies covering the same loss. It is a provision that clarifies how the insurer will handle overlapping coverage in case of multiple policies covering the same loss.
Explanation:
If the grievance committee feels potentially unethical conduct may have occurred, they conduct a hearing to determine whether one or more articles of the code have been violated. t or f
It is false that the grievance committee performs an investigation to establish whether one or more articles of the code have been broken when they suspect possibly unethical behaviour may have taken place.
When the Grievance Committee suspects possibly unethical behaviour, they hold an investigation to see if the Code's provisions have been broken. The Ethics Committee has the right, as it would in any circumstance, to decide whether to report a potential legal violation to the relevant law enforcement agency.
Instead, to ascertain whether the complaint might be interpreted as a violation of the Code if the complaint is taken, the Grievance Committee reviews the complaint and performs any inquiry deemed appropriate.
Learn more about committee Visit: brainly.com/question/28083580
#SPJ4
which of the following describes a group of elected officials whose mission is to preserve order in the community and the health, safety and welfare of its citizens?
Town Council describes a group of elected officials whose mission is to preserve order in the community and the health, safety and welfare of its citizens.
What is Town Council?Local councils strive to enhance community welfare and deliver better services. They primarily engage in three types of activities: representing the neighborhood, providing services to address neighborhood needs, and working to enhance quality of life and community wellbeing. a body of elected authorities tasked with upholding communal peace and ensuring the welfare and safety of its residents. Although the town council is a municipal organization as well, the planning board and zoning board of appeals play a more narrowly focused role. To keep them in good condition and for the benefit of the community, TCs oversee, manage, maintain, and improve the common property of the homes and businesses located within their towns.To learn more about Town Council refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/30258701
#SPJ4
true/false. consider a recent event, either in your personal life or in the news. in a few sentences, describe how basic knowledge of the social sciences could help you better understand that event, make decisions, or act.
A variety of academic disciplines known as the social sciences are primarily concerned with societal inquiry. It investigates human nature, interpersonal interactions, cultural development, and global impact.
In other terms, social science offers knowledge about how society works. Social scientists' ideas are being used by several business and public sector groups to address a variety of issues, including poverty and child development, among others. Social sciences can also be applied personally. For instance, history, anthropology, or archaeology can be used to understand how humans have developed tools over time. Understanding one's psychological requirements and how to meet them is made possible by subjects like psychology. Take the current Israel-Palestine conflict as an example. Many individuals believe that Palestine and Mossad are the causes. Different perspectives on these confrontations paint a vivid picture of how different people might interpret the same incident in different ways.
Learn more about social science here
https://brainly.com/question/17260532
#SPJ4
Answer this question in at least 4 sentences.
14. Explain how a supreme court's ruling and precedents can change over
time. Be sure to identify who has the authority to establish a new
precedent, and provide an example of a precedent that changed.
Answer this question in at least 4 sentences.
A Supreme Court's ruling and precedents can change over time as the court reassesses and reinterprets the law in light of new social and legal developments. The Supreme Court has the authority to establish new precedents, through their decisions and rulings that set legal principles that must be followed by lower courts. A precedent can change when a new case is brought before the court, and the court reconsiders its previous ruling, or when the court's composition changes and new justices bring new perspectives to the court.
An example of a precedent that changed over time is the "separate but equal" doctrine. This doctrine, established in the 1896 Supreme Court case Plessy v. Ferguson, upheld the constitutionality of state laws requiring racial segregation as long as the separate facilities were equal in quality. However, in the 1954 case of Brown v. Board of Education, the court reversed this precedent and ruled that segregation in public schools was inherently unequal, and therefore unconstitutional.
