In the transmission of digital information, the probability that a bit has high, moderate, and low distortion is 0.02, 0.07, and 0.91, respectively. Suppose that three bits are transmitted and that the amount of distortion of each bit is assumed to be independent. Let and denote the number of bits with high and moderate distortion out of the three, respectively. Determine the following:
A. fxy(x,y).
B. fx(x).
C. E(X).
D. Are X and Y independent?

Step-by-step explanation:

We need the function f(x) to be able to determine the required.

Suppose we were given a function

f(x) = y

f'(x) represents the first derivative of the function f(x) = y.

f'(1) represents the value of the first derivative of the function f(x) = y after replacing x by 1.

f'(5) represents the value of the first derivative of the function f(x) = y after replacing x by 5.

Example: Suppose f(x) = x² + 3x, find

f'(x), f'(1), and f'(5).

f'(x) = 2x + 3

f'(1) = 2(1) + 3 = 5

f'(5) = 2(5) + 3 = 13

Multiply her savings by the percent spent:

850 x 0.35 = 297.50

The tv cost $297.50

Answer:

the price of TV is = 297.5$

Step-by-step explanation:

all money= 850$

purchased money= 35% of all money ==> 850 ( 35%) = 297.5$

Answer:

C ; A

Step-by-step explanation:

Question 30:

Perimeter is the sum of all sides.

Perimeter for a recatngle can be found with the formula:

2(L+W)

Length is 7

Width is 4

Plug our values in.

2(7+4)

2(11)

22

Answer C

Question 31:

Circumference of a circle can be found with the formula:

πd.

Diameter of the given circle is 6.

Plug it in

6π

Round π to 3.14

6(3.14)

18.84

Answer A

Answer:

x = 5/v

Step-by-step explanation:

Solve for x:

2 v x - 5 = 5

Add 5 to both sides:

2 v x = 10

Divide both sides by 2 v:

Answer: x = 5/v

Answer:

I'd say start with "Add 5 to both sides"

Step-by-step explanation:

VX +VX-5 = 5

Add 5 to both sides

2VX=10

Divide both sides by 2

VX=5

Divide both sides by V

X=[tex]\frac{5}{V}[/tex]

Answer:

[tex]=3\frac{5}{6}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]2\frac{1}{2}+1\frac{1}{3}\\\mathrm{Add\:whole\:numbers}\:2+1:\quad 3\\\mathrm{Combine\:fractions}\:\frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{3}:\quad \frac{5}{6}\\=3\frac{5}{6}[/tex]

Answer:

B. Average of the data set

Step-by-step explanation:

The mean is defined as the average of a data set and it's formula is

Mean = [tex]\frac{sum of observations}{number of observations}[/tex]

Answer:

360 miles

Step-by-step explanation:

(a)

[tex] \sqrt[5]{ {x}^{3} } [/tex]

(b)

[tex] \sqrt[8]{x} [/tex]

(c)

[tex] \sqrt[3]{ {x}^{5} } [/tex]

(d)

[tex] \sqrt{ {x}^{3} } [/tex]

Answer:

Option c

Step-by-step explanation:

This is an experiment because the researcher wants to test efficiency of the magnetic bracelets in the elimination of motion sickness i.e. whether they experienced motion sickness even after wearing the magnetic bracelets.

We have a right triangle and we're given the leg lengths.  

tan X = |YZ| / |XZ| = 20/8 = 5/2

X = arctan(5/2) = 68.2°

Answer: 68.2°

tan X = YZ / XZ = 20/8 = 5/2

X = arctan(5/2) = 68.2°

Answer: 68.2°

Answer:

76 cm

Step-by-step explanation:

To find the perimeter, add up all of the side lengths.

18 cm + 26 cm + 32 cm = 76 cm

I hope this helps :))

Answer:

= ( $72.756, $110.804)

Therefore, the 90% confidence interval (a,b) = ( $72.756, $110.804)

Critical value at 90% confidence = 1.645

Step-by-step explanation:

Confidence interval can be defined as a range of values so defined that there is a specified probability that the value of a parameter lies within it.

The confidence interval of a statistical data can be written as.

x+/-zr/√n

Given that;

Mean x = $91.78

Standard deviation r = $23.13

Number of samples n = 4

Confidence interval = 90%

Using the z table;

z(α=0.05) = 1.645

Critical value at 90% confidence = 1.645

Substituting the values we have;

$91.78+/-1.645($23.13/√4)

$91.78+/-1.645($11.565)

$91.78+/-$19.024425

$91.78+/-$19.024

= ( $72.756, $110.804)

Therefore, the 90% confidence interval (a,b) = ( $72.756, $110.804)

Answer:

A right triangle consists of two legs and a hypotenuse.

Step-by-step explanation:

The two legs meet at a 90° angle and the hypotenuse is the longest side of the right triangle and is the side opposite the right angle. There are a couple of special types of right triangles, like the 45°-45° right triangles and the 30°-60° right triangle.

Answer:

P(B) = 0.62

Step-by-step explanation:

P(A or B) = P(A) + P(B) - P(A and B)

So, Putting the givens

0.89 = 0.48 + P(B) - 0.21

0.89 = 0.27 + P(B)

P(B) = 0.89 - 0.27

P(B) = 0.62

Answer:

1, 5, 25, 125, ...

3, 6, 12, 24, ...

Step-by-step explanation:

1, 5, 25, 125, ...

3, 6, 9, 12,...

3, 6, 12, 24, ...

3, 9, 81, 6, 561, ...

10, 20, 40, 60, ...

Answer: -116 is value of discriminant

Answer:

a) H0: [tex]\sigma = 1.34[/tex]

H1: [tex]\sigma \neq 1.34[/tex]

b) [tex] df = n-1= 10-1=9[/tex]

And the critical values with [tex]\alpha/2=0.005[/tex] on each tail are:

[tex] \chi_{\alpha/2}= 1.735, \chi_{1-\alpha/2}= 23.589[/tex]

c) [tex] t=(10-1) [\frac{1.186}{1.34}]^2 =7.05[/tex]

d) For this case since the critical value is not higher or lower than the critical values we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis and we can conclude that the true deviation is not significantly different from 1.34

Step-by-step explanation:

Information provided

n = 10 sample size

s= 1.186 the sample deviation

[tex]\sigma_o =1.34[/tex] the value that we want to test

[tex]p_v [/tex] represent the p value for the test

t represent the statistic  (chi square test)

[tex]\alpha=0.01[/tex] significance level

Part a

On this case we want to test if the true deviation is 1,34 or no, so the system of hypothesis are:

H0: [tex]\sigma = 1.34[/tex]

H1: [tex]\sigma \neq 1.34[/tex]

The statistic is given by:

[tex] t=(n-1) [\frac{s}{\sigma_o}]^2 [/tex]

Part b

The degrees of freedom are given by:

[tex] df = n-1= 10-1=9[/tex]

And the critical values with [tex]\alpha/2=0.005[/tex] on each tail are:

[tex] \chi_{\alpha/2}= 1.735, \chi_{1-\alpha/2}= 23.589[/tex]

Part c

Replacing the info we got:

[tex] t=(10-1) [\frac{1.186}{1.34}]^2 =7.05[/tex]

Part d

For this case since the critical value is not higher or lower than the critical values we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis and we can conclude that the true deviation is not significantly different from 1.34

Answer:

x - 5 - (3/x+8)

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

a) The standard deviation of the annual income σₓ = 2045

b)

The calculated value Z = 0.608 < 1.645 at 10 % level of significance

Null hypothesis is accepted

The average annual income is greater than $32,000

c)

The calculated value Z = 1.0977 < 1.96 at 5 % level of significance

Null hypothesis is accepted

The average annual income is  equal to  $33,000

d)

95% of confidence intervals of the Average annual income

(26 ,746.8 ,34, 763.2)

Step-by-step explanation:

Given size of the sample 'n' =100

mean of the sample x⁻ =  $30,755

The Standard deviation = $20,450

a)

The standard deviation of the annual income σₓ = [tex]\frac{S.D}{\sqrt{n} }[/tex]

                                               = [tex]\frac{20,450}{\sqrt{100} }= 2045[/tex]

b)

Given mean of the Population μ =  $32,000

Given size of the sample 'n' =100

mean of the sample x⁻ =  $30,755

The Standard deviation ( σ)= $20,450

Null Hypothesis:- H₀: μ > $32,000

Alternative Hypothesis:H₁: μ <  $32,000

Level of significance α = 0.10

[tex]Z = \frac{x^{-}-mean }{\frac{S.D}{\sqrt{n} } }[/tex]

[tex]Z = \frac{30755-32000 }{\frac{20450}{\sqrt{100} } }[/tex]

Z= |-0.608| = 0.608

The calculated value Z = 0.608 < 1.645 at 10 % level of significance

Null hypothesis is accepted

The average annual income is  greater than $32,000

c)

Given mean of the Population μ =  $33,000

Given size of the sample 'n' =100

mean of the sample x⁻ =  $30,755

The Standard deviation ( σ)= $20,450

Null Hypothesis:- H₀: μ =  $33,000

Alternative Hypothesis:H₁: μ ≠ $33,000

Level of significance α = 0.05

[tex]Z = \frac{x^{-}-mean }{\frac{S.D}{\sqrt{n} } }[/tex]

[tex]Z = \frac{30755-33000 }{\frac{20450}{\sqrt{100} } }[/tex]

Z = -1.0977

|Z|= |-1.0977| = 1.0977

The 95% of z -value = 1.96

The calculated value Z = 1.0977 < 1.96 at 5 % level of significance

Null hypothesis is accepted

The average annual income is equal to  $33,000

d)

95% of confidence intervals is determined by

[tex](x^{-} - 1.96 \frac{S.D}{\sqrt{n} } , x^{-} + 1.96 \frac{S.D}{\sqrt{n} })[/tex]

[tex](30755 - 1.96 \frac{20450}{\sqrt{100} } , 30755 +1.96 \frac{20450}{\sqrt{100} })[/tex]

( 30 755 - 4008.2 , 30 755 +4008.2)

95% of confidence intervals of the Average annual income

(26 ,746.8 ,34, 763.2)

Answer:

a) at 5 minutes: 162 gal/min

b) at 10 minutes:  144 gal/min

c) at 20 minutes:  108 gal/min

d) at 50 minutes: 0 gal/min

Step-by-step explanation:

Considering the formula given by the volume of water remaining in the tank:

we can find the rate of water draining from the tank, (that is change in volume divided elapsed time) with the derivative of the function at the different times. Notice that this function has a decaying curvature (see attached image) of volume as a function of time, and the idea is therefore to find the slope of the tangent line at the different requested times.

So we first calculate the derivative of this function at any time 't":

[tex]V(t)=4500\,(1-\frac{1}{50} \,t)^2\\V'(t)=9000\,(1-\frac{1}{50} \,t)\,(-\frac{1}{50})\\V'(t)=-180(1-\frac{1}{50} \,t)\\V'(t)=-180+3.6\,t[/tex]

And now we estimate this derivative at the different requested points for time values:

a) at 5 minutes:  [tex]V'(5)=-180+3.6\,(5) = -162\,\,gal/min[/tex]

b) at 10 minutes:   [tex]V'(10)=-180+3.6\,(10) = -144\,\,gal/min[/tex]

c) at 20 minutes:   [tex]V'(20)=-180+3.6\,(20) = -108\,\,gal/min[/tex]

d) at 50 minutes:  [tex]V'(50)=-180+3.6\,(50) = 0\,\,gal/min[/tex]

All the negative signs preceding indicate that the remaining volume in the tank is reducing as time goes by, so the volume at which the water is draining is actually the absolute value of those numbers.

Answer:

The null and alternative hypothesis for this problem are:

[tex]H_0:\mu=380\\\\H_a: \mu>380[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

The alternative hypothesis shows the claim of the researchers. In this case, that the new type of fertilizer significantly increase the actual yield with the old fertilizer:

[tex]H_a: \mu>380[/tex]

The null hypothesis is the hypothesis to be nullified, so it states that the claim is not true and the yield is the same (or, at least, not significantly higher) as with the old fertilizer:

[tex]H_0: \mu=380[/tex]

Answer:

Zero

Step-by-step explanation:

Because when you replace x with a number and solve it it doesn't have the same answer as x2 − 9 = 0.

I hope this helped. I am sorry if you get this wrong.

Answer:

60%

Step-by-step explanation:

Percent means out of 100

Changing 3/5 to a denominator of 100

3/5*20/20

60/100

The percent is 60 %

Answer:

A. 1/2

Step-by-step explanation:

In this uniform distribution (from 6 to 12 pounds), the probability of any given range (from 'a' to 'b' pounds) is determined by:

[tex]P = \frac{b-a}{12 - 6}[/tex]

For a = 8 pounds and b = 11 pounds, the probability is:

[tex]P=\frac{11-8}{12-6}\\P=\frac{3}{6}=\frac{1}{2}[/tex]

The probability of the range of pounds lost being between 8 pounds and 11 pounds is 1/2.

Answer: (-6, 0)

Step-by-step explanation:

X-intercepts of equations are any points on the equation that lie on the x-axis, or the horizontal line "y = 0".

In order to find the x-intercept of an equation, find the points that will satisfy the equation "y = 0":

y = (x + 6)(x - 3)

y = 0

(x + 6)(x - 3) = 0

With this equation, you can find which points lie on the x-axis.

When x = -6, the equation is: 0 * -9 = 0, which is correct.

When x = 3, the equation is 9 * 0 = 0, which is correct.

Make sure you're picking the correct coordinate out of the answer choices.

The x-coordinates are -6 and 3, and the y-coordinates are 0, because the points lie on the x-axis.

The correct answer is (-6, 0).

(3, 0) is also correct, but the question does not require it.

Answer:

D

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Y = 0

X= 1/2

Z = -1/2

Step-by-step explanation:

4x-y+ 2z=-1

-x+y-3z= 1

-x+2y + 5z = 2

Solving simultenously

Y= 4x + 2z -1

Y =1+ 3z+ x

Y =x/2 -( 5z/2) - 1

Equating y will give two equations

3x-z = 2

3x + 11z = -4

Subtracting the equations

-12z =6

Z= -1/2

Substituting z

3x +1/2 = 2

3x = 3/2

X= 1/2

Substituting x and z to find y in

-x+y-3z= 1

-1/2 + y +3/2 = 1

Y = 1-1

Y = 0

Answer: b) is answer

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

The null hypothesis is rejected.

There is enough evidence to support the claim that rates are higher for single male policyholders verses married male policyholders (P-value = 0.004).

Step-by-step explanation:

This is a hypothesis test for the difference between proportions.

The claim is that rates are higher for single male policyholders verses married male policyholders.

Then, the null and alternative hypothesis are:

[tex]H_0: \pi_1-\pi_2=0\\\\H_a:\pi_1-\pi_2> 0[/tex]

The significance level is 0.05.

The sample 1 (single group), of size n1=450 has a proportion of p1=0.1489.

[tex]p_1=X_1/n_1=67/450=0.1489[/tex]

The sample 2 (married group), of size n2=925 has a proportion of p2=0.1005.

[tex]p_2=X_2/n_2=93/925=0.1005[/tex]

The difference between proportions is (p1-p2)=0.0483.

[tex]p_d=p_1-p_2=0.1489-0.1005=0.0483[/tex]

The pooled proportion, needed to calculate the standard error, is:

[tex]p=\dfrac{X_1+X_2}{n_1+n_2}=\dfrac{67.005+93}{450+925}=\dfrac{160}{1375}=0.1164[/tex]

The estimated standard error of the difference between means is computed using the formula:

[tex]s_{p1-p2}=\sqrt{\dfrac{p(1-p)}{n_1}+\dfrac{p(1-p)}{n_2}}=\sqrt{\dfrac{0.1164*0.8836}{450}+\dfrac{0.1164*0.8836}{925}}\\\\\\s_{p1-p2}=\sqrt{0.0002+0.0001}=\sqrt{0.0003}=0.0184[/tex]

Then, we can calculate the z-statistic as:

[tex]z=\dfrac{p_d-(\pi_1-\pi_2)}{s_{p1-p2}}=\dfrac{0.0483-0}{0.0184}=\dfrac{0.0483}{0.0184}=2.62[/tex]

This test is a right-tailed test, so the P-value for this test is calculated as (using a z-table):

[tex]P-value=P(z>2.62)=0.004[/tex]

As the P-value (0.004) is smaller than the significance level (0.05), the effect is significant.

The null hypothesis is rejected.

There is enough evidence to support the claim that rates are higher for single male policyholders verses married male policyholders.

Answer:

[tex]n=(\frac{z_{\alpha/2} \sigma}{ME})^2[/tex]   (b)

The critical value for 80% of confidence interval now can be founded using the normal distribution the significance level would be 20% and the critical value [tex]z_{\alpha/2}=1.28[/tex], replacing into formula (b) we got:

[tex]n=(\frac{1.28(1.8)}{0.12})^2 =368.64 \approx 369[/tex]

So the answer for this case would be n=369 rounded up to the nearest integer

Step-by-step explanation:

We know the following info given:

[tex] \sigma = 1.8[/tex] represent the standard deviation

[tex]\mu = 5.8[/tex] the true mean that she believes

[tex] ME = 0.12[/tex] represent the margin of error

The margin of error is given by this formula:

[tex] ME=z_{\alpha/2}\frac{s}{\sqrt{n}}[/tex]    (a)

And on this case we have that ME =+0.12 and we are interested in order to find the value of n, if we solve n from equation (a) we got:

[tex]n=(\frac{z_{\alpha/2} \sigma}{ME})^2[/tex]   (b)

The critical value for 80% of confidence interval now can be founded using the normal distribution the significance level would be 20% and the critical value [tex]z_{\alpha/2}=1.28[/tex], replacing into formula (b) we got:

[tex]n=(\frac{1.28(1.8)}{0.12})^2 =368.64 \approx 369[/tex]

So the answer for this case would be n=369 rounded up to the nearest integer

Answer:

D: <K = 35°

Step-by-step explanation:

<E = 55

<L = 90°

Now

<LKE = 180-90-55

<K = 35°

Answer:

[tex]\fbox{\begin{minipage}{8.8em}Option D is correct\end{minipage}}[/tex]

Explanation:

Here, we state again the definition of inscribed angle in circle:

(1) An inscribed angle has the vertex on the circle and the sides are chords.

=> In the picture shown, angle ELK is inscribed angle with vertex L and LE and LK are chords.

(2)An inscribed angle also creates an intercepted arc whose endpoints are on the angle.

=> Inscribed angle ELK creates intercepted arc EK.

(3) According to the Inscribed Angle Theorem, the measure of intercepted arc is twice as the measure of its inscribed angle.

=> Angle ELK = (1/2) arc EK

Arc EK, whose EK is diameter, is equal to measure of half of circle, or 180 degree, in other words.

=> Angle ELK = (1/2) x 180 = 90 deg

(4) As the property of sum of 3 angles inside a triangle, this sum is equal to 180 degree.

=> Considering triangle ELK:

ELK + LEK + LKE = 180 deg

or

90 + 55 + LKE = 180 deg

or

LKE = 180 - 90 - 55 = 35 deg

Hope this helps!

:)

Answer:

Maths keeps one mentally active. The total surface of a hemisphere = 3(pi)r^2. So if the radius = 10 cm, then the TSA = 3(pi)r^2 = 300(pi) = 942.8571429 sq cm.

Step-by-step explanation:

hope this helps you :)

Answer:

The total surface of a hemisphere = 3(pi)r^2.

So if the radius = 10 cm, then the TSA = 3(pi)r^2 = 300(pi) = 942.8571429 sq cm.