Answer:
Most aspects of civil litigation occur in the courtroom such as the exchange of discovery materials and depositions.
Explanation:
Case law, the opinions of judges in the past cases, has little, if any, relevance to civil procedure. Continuing legal education is important for a litigation paralegal.
Answer:
Civil litigation cases can be settled outside of court or handled by way of
alternative dispute resolution(ADR)
- If the case goes to court, the issues will be decided by a judge.
- If the case is settled out of court, both parties have slightly more control over how issues are decided.
Explanation:
- Typically, civil litigation cases have one party (the plaintiff that is seeking money or some other kind of remedy (damages) from another party, whom we call the defendant.
- Non criminal cases, the nature of these cases is extremely broad and differs from client to client.
A woman was found strangled in the basement of her home where she lived with her husband. The crime scene was
processed and investigators left. The next day, the medical examiner reported that a scalloped, woven belt was
used to strangle the victim. The police want to search the house again to look for such a belt. Which statement is
true?
The police need to get a search warrant, according to Michigan v. Tyler.
The police do not need a warrant because the house is still a valid crime scene, according to Mincey v.
Arizona
The police need to get a search warrant, according to Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals.
The police do not need a warrant, according to the Third Amendment to the U.S.
Constitution.
PLEASE HELP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Answer: (B)
Explanation: they police do not need a search warrant because the house is a valid crime.
According to Mincey v. Arizona, Mincey's remarks were voluntary and a warrantless search of a crime scene was legal under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments.
Thus, Option B is correct.
What was the result of Tyler vs. Michigan?The U.S. Supreme Court found in Michigan v. Tyler that "exigent circumstances" existed when a fire suppression crew entered a building to put out a fire that had broken out within. Additionally, the decision would serve as a precedent for fire/arson investigators to follow in order to uphold the fourth amendment's prohibition on arbitrary search and seizure.
In Michigan v. Clifford, the U.S. Supreme Court decided that where an investigation is not a continuation of the initial entrance, a consent to search or an administrative search warrant must be acquired. When an investigator concludes that arson was the source of the fire, the investigator must halt the search and re-obtain the property owner's permission to search or a criminal search warrant. This distinguishes between a criminal search and an origin-and-cause search.
For more information about Mincey v.Arizona refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/26176025
#SPJ2
Under the Driver Responsibility Program (DRP), a driver accumulates ___ points for every traffic conviction which does not result in a
crash.
2
6
4
8
Answer:
2 points
Explanation:
The Driver Responsibility Program (DRP) was set up to help in managing the activities of road users; mainly drivers. Drivers who broke the traffic rules were made to face the wrath of the law.
It involves assigning points to the offenders according to their offences.
A driver accumulates 2 points for every traffic conviction which does not result in a crash which includes running the traffic light. The driver is also fined.
TRUE OR FALSE FOR EACH BRAINLIEST ANSWER PLEASE 1. The Statute of Limitations discharges a debt by operation of law unless the debtor reinstates the debt. 2. In most situations, when a breach of contract occurs, the innocent injured party is held to a duty to mitigate the damages.
Answer:
1) FALSE
2) TRUE
Explanation:
In most situations, when a breach of contract occurs, the injured party is held to a duty to mitigate, or reduce, the damages that he or she suffers.
Find the right match for the decision, precedent, and influence of Brown v. Board of Education.
court decision.
Social impact.
Legal precedent.
Ruled that segregation violated the Fourteenth Amendment.
Overturned "separate but equal" as a legal practice.
Gave force to the growing civil rights movement
Answer:
court decision: Ruled that segregation violated the Fourteenth Amendment.
Legal precedent.: Overturned "separate but equal" as a legal practice.
Social impact: Gave force to the growing civil rights movement
Explanation:
In Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka (1954), the Supreme Court ruled that racial segregation in public schools infringed the Fourteenth Amendment. By doing so, it overruled the Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) decision that claimed racial segregation under the “separate but equal” doctrine was constitutional.
By establishing a precedent about “separate-but-equal” education, as well as any other segregating practices, as not equal at all, Brown v. Board of Education became one of the pillars of the civil rights movement.
Answer:
court decision: Ruled that segregation violated the Fourteenth Amendment.
Legal precedent.: Overturned "separate but equal" as a legal practice.
Social impact: Gave force to the growing civil rights movement
Explanation: Got them right on edg
19. The Smith System is
A. О a system of safe driving.
B. O a car maintenance system.
a plan of healthy eating.
D.
a work out program.
C.
Which of the following would ONLY
SUPPORT the new Constitution if it
included the Bill of Rights?
A. Federalists
B. The States
C. Anti-Federalists
D. Supreme Court
