Answer: 1. Coffee
Explanation: Coffee was one of the most important export products for many South American countries prior to the Great Depression. Countries such as Brazil, Colombia, Venezuela, Ecuador, and Peru depended heavily on coffee exports for their foreign exchange earnings and economic growth. Coffee was also a major source of employment, income, and tax revenue for these countries.
However, coffee was also a very vulnerable commodity to the fluctuations of the world market. Coffee prices were determined by the supply and demand of coffee producers and consumers, mainly in Europe and North America. Coffee production was also subject to climatic conditions, pests, diseases, and political instability. Therefore, coffee exports were prone to cycles of boom and bust that affected the economic and social conditions of the coffee-producing countries.
The Great Depression was a severe shock for the coffee industry in South America. The collapse of the stock market in 1929 and the subsequent economic downturn in the industrialized countries reduced the demand for coffee and other commodities. The prices of coffee fell dramatically from 22 cents per pound in 1929 to 8 cents per pound in 1931. The volume of coffee exports also declined from 2.6 million tons in 1929 to 1.8 million tons in 1932.
The decline in coffee exports had devastating effects on the economies of South America. The countries faced a severe shortage of foreign exchange, which limited their ability to import essential goods and services and to service their external debts. The governments also faced a fiscal crisis, as their revenues from export taxes and tariffs dwindled. The coffee sector also suffered from unemployment, poverty, social unrest, and political instability.
The governments of South America tried to cope with the crisis by adopting various measures, such as:
Devaluing their currencies: This was done to stimulate exports and discourage imports by making domestic goods cheaper and foreign goods more expensive. However, this also increased inflation and reduced the purchasing power of the people.Imposing trade barriers: This was done to protect domestic industries and markets from foreign competition by imposing tariffs, quotas, subsidies, and exchange controls. However, this also reduced trade opportunities and provoked retaliation from other countries.Forming coffee agreements: This was done to stabilize coffee prices and regulate coffee production and trade by forming cartels or agreements among coffee-producing countries or with coffee-consuming countries. For example, Brazil signed an agreement with the United States in 1931 to restrict its coffee exports in exchange for a loan of $100 million. However, these agreements were often ineffective or short-lived due to lack of enforcement or cooperation.Diversifying their economies: This was done to reduce their dependence on coffee exports and develop other sectors of their economies, such as industry, agriculture, mining, or services. For example, Brazil promoted industrialization through import substitution policies that encouraged domestic production of manufactured goods. However, these policies required significant investment, infrastructure, technology, and skills that were often lacking or costly.These are some of the ways that South American countries tried to help solve their economic problems caused by the Great Depression. However, none of these measures were sufficient or successful in restoring their economic prosperity or stability. It was not until after World War II that South America recovered from the effects of the Great Depression.
Hope this helps, and have a great day! =)
Which side won the most battles during the war of 1812
Answer:
Explanation:
la marina de eeuu obtuvo victorias mas significativas :)
The Triple Alliance includes which peoples?
A. Texcoco, Mexihcah, and Olmec
B. Texcoco, Mexihcah, and Tlacopan
C. Inca, Tlacopan, and Mexihcah
The Triple Alliance includes B. Texcoco, Mexihcah, and Tlacopan peoples.
The Triple Alliance, also known as the Aztec Triple Alliance or the Triple Alliance of Tenochtitlan, was a political and military alliance formed in the 15th century in Mesoamerica. It played a crucial role in the rise and dominance of the Aztec Empire.
The three peoples involved in the Triple Alliance were Texcoco, Mexihcah (also known as Mexica or Aztecs), and Tlacopan. These were three major city-states in the region, each with its own power and influence.
Texcoco was one of the most prominent city-states in the Valley of Mexico and was known for its advanced cultural and intellectual achievements. It had a powerful ruling dynasty and a well-developed society.
Mexihcah, or Mexica, was the name used by the Aztecs to refer to themselves. They originated from the mythical land of Aztlan and migrated to the Valley of Mexico, where they established their capital city of Tenochtitlan. The Mexihcah were known for their military prowess and their expansionist ambitions.
Tlacopan, sometimes referred to as Tacuba, was a smaller city-state located in the western part of the Valley of Mexico. It was initially a subordinate ally of Texcoco and Tenochtitlan but later became an equal partner in the Triple Alliance.
Together, these three city-states formed the Triple Alliance, pooling their resources, military strength, and political influence to dominate the region. They engaged in military campaigns, established tributary relationships with other city-states, and expanded their control over vast territories, ultimately establishing the Aztec Empire.
In summary, the Triple Alliance included the city-states of Texcoco, Mexihcah (Aztecs), and Tlacopan. This alliance played a pivotal role in the rise and dominance of the Aztec Empire in Mesoamerica.
for more questions on Alliance
https://brainly.com/question/384845
#SPJ8
Theater Studies! please help!
Where do theaters most often advertise for upcoming shows?
in newspapers
on the radio
on television
in locally distributed flyers
the answer would be in newspapers!
Who was to blame for the first world war?
Answer:
austria hungary
Which document begins with the words "We the people of the United States"?
Answer:
The document that begins with the words "We the People of the United States" is the United States Constitution. The full preamble of the Constitution is as follows:
"We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."
Why did troops surround Gulliver
A herd of sheep moves up the mountain to graze during summer, and migrates to the valley during winter. What type of migration do the sheep follow?
Visit the websites for the following social welfare programs established by the U.S. government:
Supplemental Security Income, Unemployment Insurance, Family Assistance (formerly
Temporary Assistance to Needy Families and AFDC), Medicaid, and Food Stamps.
Then
write an 8-10 sentence paragraph in which you answer the guiding questions below. Please do
not give me your one-sided opinion about why you like or hate these programs or who should
or should not benefit from them, just answer the questions with the facts you find on
government websites. This activity will familiarize you with the wide variety of social programs
in the United States and will help you them understand the process by which benefits from
these programs are distributed. This is especially relevant right now, because tens of millions
people lost their jobs during the pandemic and relied on these programs to be able to feed their
families and keep their utilities turned on.
Guiding questions you must answer:
1. Can you receive any of these benefits if you are an undocumented person?
2. What can you buy with food stamps? What can you not buy?
3. How much money can the average person in Texas get on unemployment, and for how long?
4. Who is eligible for what is commonly known as "welfare" money? Who is not eligible?
5. What kind of medical services does Medicaid cover? What does it not cover?
Answer:
Explanation:
After visiting the websites for Supplemental Security Income, Unemployment Insurance, Family Assistance (formerly Temporary Assistance to Needy Families and AFDC), Medicaid, and Food Stamps, I can answer the guiding questions as follows:
1. Undocumented persons are generally not eligible for most federal public benefits, including Supplemental Security Income, Food Stamps, and Medicaid. However, there are some exceptions such as emergency medical treatment and disaster relief assistance.
2. Food stamps can be used to buy food and groceries, including fruits, vegetables, meats, bread, dairy products, and seeds and plants to grow food. However, they cannot be used to buy non-food items such as pet food, household supplies, or alcohol.
3. The amount of money and duration of unemployment benefits vary from state to state. In Texas, the maximum unemployment benefit is $521 per week, and the duration of benefits ranges from 12 to 26 weeks, depending on certain factors.
4. Eligibility for welfare benefits such as Family Assistance depends on factors such as income, household size, and citizenship status. Generally, low-income families with children who meet certain requirements may be eligible for cash assistance, while able-bodied adults without dependents may be subject to work requirements and time limits.
5. Medicaid covers a wide range of medical services, including doctor visits, hospital care, prescription drugs, and preventive care such as cancer screenings and immunizations. However, it may not cover certain optional services such as dental care, vision care, and long-term care in a nursing home.
Overall, these social welfare programs aim to provide assistance to those in need and protect vulnerable populations. While eligibility requirements and program details may vary, their role in supporting individuals and families during difficult times cannot be understated.
Maura is a member of an ethnic group who has family in another small country. Maura has received a letter from her family telling her that the local officials have begun to raid their homes and imprison them. It seems that the group is being targeted because they are members of the ethnic group. Maura is worried because the country is so small that it is unlikely that many people know about what is happening. What would be the BEST way for Maura to help her family abroad?
A.
Maura could buy a plane ticket to visit her relatives and see for herself.
B.
Maura could contact several news organizations to see if they will do a story.
C.
Maura could hold a benefit concert to raise money for her relatives.
D.
Maura could speak up in her classroom when someone makes a racist joke.
The best way for Maura to help her family abroad in the given situation would be option B: Maura could contact several news organizations to see if they will do a story.
Contacting news organizations would be the most effective way for Maura to raise awareness about the situation her family and ethnic group are facing. By sharing the information with media outlets, Maura can potentially reach a broader audience and bring attention to the human rights violations and targeting of her ethnic group. News organizations have the ability to investigate, report, and raise awareness about such issues, which can lead to increased international scrutiny and pressure on the country involved.While options A, C, and D may have their merits in different contexts, they are not as effective in addressing the urgent situation Maura's family is facing. Visiting her relatives in person (option A) may provide emotional support, but it is unlikely to have a significant impact on the larger issue. Holding a benefit concert (option C) could raise funds, but it may not directly address the systematic targeting of her ethnic group. Speaking up in her classroom (option D) is important, but it may not have immediate consequences for her family abroad.Correct option is : B. Maura could contact several news organizations to see if they will do a story.
For more such questions on news organizations
https://brainly.com/question/25922351
#SPJ8
Why do you think Churchill used the phrase a
second time?
Answer:
Without knowing the specific context in which Churchill used the phrase a second time, it is difficult to provide a definitive answer. However, in general, politicians and public speakers often repeat phrases or slogans for emphasis and to reinforce their message. Repeating a phrase can also help to make it more memorable and to ensure that it is properly understood by the audience.
Churchill was known for his powerful speeches, and he often used repetition to great effect. For example, in his famous "We shall fight on the beaches" speech delivered on June 4, 1940, he used the phrase "We shall fight" multiple times to emphasize Britain's determination to resist Nazi Germany. By repeating the phrase, Churchill was able to convey a sense of urgency and determination that resonated with his audience.
In general, repeating a phrase or slogan can be an effective rhetorical technique for making a point or conveying a message. It can help to reinforce key ideas and to ensure that they are properly understood and remembered by the audience.
name every country in africa
Answer:
Algeria (People's Democratic Republic of Algeria)
Angola (Republic of Angola)
Benin (Republic of Benin)
Botswana (Republic of Botswana)
Burkina Faso
Burundi (Republic of Burundi)
Cameroon (Republic of Cameroon)
Cape Verde (Republic of Cape Verde)
Central African Republic (Central African Republic)
Chad (Republic of Chad)
Comoros (Union of the Comoros)
Côte d'Ivoire (Republic of Côte d'Ivoire)
Djibouti (Republic of Djibouti)
Egypt (Arab Republic of Egypt)
Equatorial Guinea (Republic of Equatorial Guinea)
Eritrea (State of Eritrea)
Ethiopia (Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia)
Gabon (Gabonese Republic)
Gambia (Republic of The Gambia)
Ghana (Republic of Ghana)
Guinea (Republic of Guinea)
Guinea-Bissau (Republic of Guinea-Bissau)
Kenya (Republic of Kenya)
Lesotho (Kingdom of Lesotho)
Liberia (Republic of Liberia)
Libya (Great Socialist People's Libyan Arab Jamahiriya)
Madagascar (Republic of Madagascar)
Malawi (Republic of Malawi)
Mali (Republic of Mali)
Mauritania (Islamic Republic of Mauritania)
Mauritius (Republic of Mauritius)
Morocco (Kingdom of Morocco)
Mozambique (Republic of Mozambique)
Namibia (Republic of Namibia)
Niger (Republic of Niger)
Nigeria (Federal Republic of Nigeria)
Republic of the Congo (Republic of the Congo)
Rwanda (Republic of Rwanda)
Sao Tome and Principe
Senegal (Republic of Senegal)
Seychelles (Republic of Seychelles)
Sierra Leone (Republic of Sierra Leone)
Somalia (Somali Republic)
South Africa (Republic of South Africa)
Sudan (Republic of Sudan)
Swaziland (Kingdom of Swaziland)
Tanzania (United Republic of Tanzania)
Togo (Togolese Republic)
Tunisia (Tunisian Republic)
Uganda (Republic of Uganda)
Western Sahara (Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic)
Zambia (Republic of Zambia)
Zimbabwe (Republic of Zimbabwe)
Explanation:
Which are examples of totalitarian governments that existed following WWI? Check all that apply.
France
Germany
Italy
China
Japan
Answer:
Germany
China
Italy
Japan
Explanation
Germany Italy Japan started WW2
Food stamps and Medicare are a example of _ grants from _ select the correct answer from the drop down menu
Food stamps and Medicare are examples of categorical grants from the federal government. So option D is Correct.
Categorical grants are a type of funding provided by the federal government to state and local governments for specific purposes or programs. These grants come with specific guidelines, requirements, and restrictions on how the funds can be used.
Option D, "Categorical and the federal government," is the correct answer because food stamps and Medicare fall under categorical grants and are administered by the federal government.
Food stamps, officially known as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), provide eligible individuals and families with financial assistance to purchase food. The program is funded by the federal government, which allocates funds to states based on specific criteria and formulas. States then administer the program and distribute benefits to qualifying individuals.
Medicare is a federal health insurance program primarily for individuals aged 65 and older. It is funded by the federal government and provides healthcare coverage to eligible individuals. The program operates through various parts, including Part A (hospital insurance) and Part B (medical insurance), among others.
Both food stamps (SNAP) and Medicare are categorical grants because they are designed to address specific needs (nutrition and healthcare, respectively) and have specific eligibility criteria and guidelines set by the federal government. The federal government provides funding to states for the implementation and administration of these programs, ensuring that they are consistent and accessible across the country.
In summary, food stamps (SNAP) and Medicare are examples of categorical grants from the federal government. These programs provide targeted assistance for nutrition and healthcare, respectively, and are administered by states following federal guidelines. Therefore, option D is Correct.
Know more about Medicare here:
https://brainly.com/question/3705607
#SPJ8
The question was Incomplete, Find the full content below:
Food stamps and Medicare are examples of __________ grants from __________.
A. Block and state governments
B. Categorical and state governments
C. Block and the federal government
D. Categorical and the federal government
A problem in a community 5 paragraph
Answer: answer is c
Explanation:
-Abraham Lincoln, during the seventh debate with
Stephen A. Douglas
Which statement describes a similarity between source 1 and source 2?
OA. Both are pieces of historical evidence.
B. Both could be secondary sources.
OC. Both are primary sources.
OD. Both show examples of chronological thinking.
SUBMIT
Answer:
The statement that describes a similarity between source 1 and source 2 is:
C. Both are primary sources.
Both source 1 (Abraham Lincoln's speech during the seventh debate with Stephen A. Douglas) and source 2 (a letter written by a soldier during the Civil War) are primary sources, as they are original sources of information that were created at the time of the events they describe. In contrast, secondary sources are interpretations or analyses of primary sources that are created after the fact, such as textbooks or historical analyses.
The Supreme Court of California ordered the University of California at Davis medical school to admit Bakke as a student true or false 
No, the Supreme Court of California did not order the University of California at Davis medical school to admit Bakke as a student.
Did Supreme Court of California order Bakke's admission?The Supreme Court of California did not issue an order for the University of California at Davis medical school to admit Bakke as a student. The reference to "Bakke" in this context likely pertains to the landmark U.S. Supreme Court case Regents of the University of California v. Bakke in 1978.
In that case, the Court ruled that the use of racial quotas in college admissions was unconstitutional. However, the specific question of whether Bakke should be admitted to UC Davis medical school was not addressed or decided by the Supreme Court of California.
Read more about Supreme Court
brainly.com/question/18228641
#SPJ1
"He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren,"—Declaration of Independence
How does this grievance relate to the founding principle "equality of all persons"?
The king treated the American colonists as unworthy of rights equal to those of British citizens by forcing them to fight each other.
The king saw the American colonists as equals of British citizens who should volunteer to fight in wars against other nations.
Colonial leaders believed the British monarchy granted equal rights and legal protections to all people in the American colonies.
Colonial leaders saw themselves as equal to British citizens who would fight on behalf of the monarchy if asked instead of forced.
Answer:
The correct interpretation is:
The king treated the American colonists as unworthy of rights equal to those of British citizens by forcing them to fight each other.
Explanation:
The grievance stated in the quote from the Declaration of Independence relates to the founding principle of "equality of all persons" by highlighting the unjust treatment of American colonists by the British monarchy. By forcing captive Americans to bear arms against their own country and become executioners of their friends and brethren, the king demonstrated a clear disregard for the equality of the colonists' rights. The act of forcing colonists to fight against their will and participate in acts of violence against their fellow Americans undermined the principle that all individuals should be treated equally and have the same rights and liberties. It showcased a blatant violation of the principle of equality and further fueled the colonists' desire for independence and the establishment of a system that upheld the rights and equality of all persons.
Answer:
A. The king treated the American colonists as unworthy of rights equal to those of British citizens by forcing them to fight each other.
Explanation:
Choose the right act to complete the sentence. Violence erupted in Kansas following the passage of the?
Answer:
The act that completed the sentence is the Kansas-Nebraska Act.
The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 was a controversial law that allowed settlers in the Kansas and Nebraska territories to decide for themselves whether or not to allow slavery within their borders. The law effectively repealed the Missouri Compromise of 1820, which had prohibited slavery in that region. The passage of the Kansas-Nebraska Act led to widespread violence and conflict in Kansas, as pro-slavery and anti-slavery settlers flooded into the territory and competed for control. This conflict, known as "Bleeding Kansas," was a precursor to the larger conflict that would erupt in the American Civil War.
The correct act to complete the sentence "Violence erupted in Kansas following the passage of the" is the Kansas-Nebraska Act.
The Kansas-Nebraska Act was a bill passed by the United States Congress on May 30, 1854, establishing the territories of Kansas and Nebraska and allowing them to decide for themselves whether to permit or prohibit slavery.The Act was introduced by Stephen Douglas of Illinois and was passed by both houses of Congress, replacing the Missouri Compromise of 1820, which had prohibited slavery north of latitude 36°30′.
This new act resulted in a significant escalation of violence in Kansas between anti-slavery and pro-slavery forces who were trying to gain control of the territory. The battle for Kansas is known as "Bleeding Kansas," and it was a significant factor leading up to the American Civil War.
The violence was fueled by the presence of pro-slavery groups from Missouri, who sought to ensure that Kansas became a slave state. Anti-slavery groups, including free-state settlers and abolitionists, also flocked to Kansas in an attempt to prevent this from happening.
However, the Kansas-Nebraska Act had far-reaching consequences beyond the Kansas Territory. The Act's repeal of the Missouri Compromise resulted in significant sectional tension between Northern and Southern states, accelerating the move toward secession and ultimately leading to the Civil War.
For more such questions on Kansas-Nebraska Act visit:
https://brainly.com/question/3515925
#SPJ8
Question 10 of 17
Which statement describes a similarity between the Safavid and Mughal
empires?
OA. Both empires began as states within the Ottoman Empire.
OB. Both empires were controlled by Sunni Muslim leaders.
OC. Both empires built powerful militaries with gunpowder weapons.
OD. Both empires aggressively persecuted religious minorities.
SUBMIT
Answer:
The statement that describes a similarity between the Safavid and Mughal empires is:
C. Both empires built powerful militaries with gunpowder weapons.
Both the Safavid and Mughal empires were known for their military strength, which was built in part on the use of gunpowder weapons. The Safavid Empire, which emerged in Persia in the 16th century, was particularly known for its elite infantry force, the Qizilbash, who were armed with muskets and other firearms. The Mughal Empire, which emerged in India in the 16th century, also had a powerful military that made extensive use of gunpowder weapons, including artillery and firearms.
Eisenhower, the military-industrial complex
was a threat to the United States because it:
The military-industrial complex, as described by President Dwight D. Eisenhower in his farewell address in 1961, was seen as a potential threat to the United States. Eisenhower, a former general and the 34th President of the United States, expressed concerns about the growing influence of the military-industrial complex on the nation's policies and economy.
Eisenhower believed that the military-industrial complex, which referred to the relationship between the military, defense contractors, and the government, had the potential to undermine democracy, distort national priorities, and perpetuate a permanent war economy. He warned that the close and mutually beneficial relationship between the military and the defense industry could lead to excessive influence over government decision-making.
One of the main concerns Eisenhower expressed was the influence of the military-industrial complex on policy decisions, particularly in regards to defense spending. He believed that the desire for profit and the need to maintain a constant demand for military weapons and equipment could lead to the unnecessary expansion of military capabilities and the allocation of excessive resources towards defense, at the expense of other pressing domestic needs.
Eisenhower also cautioned that the military-industrial complex could have a negative impact on democratic processes. The close ties between defense contractors and government officials could potentially lead to conflicts of interest, corruption, and the undue influence of special interest groups on policy-making. This could undermine the democratic principles of transparency, accountability, and the public interest.
In conclusion, Eisenhower saw the military-industrial complex as a potential threat to the United States because he believed it could distort national priorities, perpetuate a permanent war economy, undermine democracy, and lead to excessive defense spending. His warning served as a reminder to remain vigilant and ensure that the influence of the military-industrial complex is kept in check to safeguard the interests of the nation and its democratic values.
for more questions on United States
https://brainly.com/question/28806805
#SPJ8
 6.04 Imperialism Assessment
Name:
Date:
When World War I began in 1914, the only African countries without ongoing European imperial influence were Liberia and Ethiopia. In Eastern Asia, China maintained political independence but had still been carved up into different European "spheres of influence.”
Your assignment is to identify the causes and effects of imperialism that were shared by Africa and China and what was unique to each. The legacy of this period is still a major force of current events today, so the more you reflect on and understand the experiences of the people in these two regions of the world the better you'll understand the news today.
Write one paragraph in response to each of the following questions:
What made the story of imperialism in Africa different—what were its unique experiences?
Replace this with a paragraph responding to the question above with specific examples from the lesson and/or research.
Any outside sources:
What made the story of imperialism in China different—what were its unique experiences?
Replace this with a paragraph responding to the question above with specific examples from the lesson and/or research.
Any outside sources:
What did these two areas of the world have in common during this period?
Replace this with a paragraph responding to the question above with specific examples from the lesson and/or research.
Any outside resources:
Answer:
What made the story of imperialism in Africa different—what were its unique experiences?
The story of imperialism in Africa was different from that of other regions due to the vastness of the continent and the diversity of its people. The Berlin Conference of 1884-1885, which divided Africa among European powers, did not take into account the various ethnic and linguistic groups in Africa. European powers used force and coercion to exploit the continent's resources, leading to the exploitation and oppression of African peoples. For example, the Belgian Congo, under the rule of King Leopold II, was treated as the king's personal property and its people were subjected to forced labor, torture, and mutilation. The effects of imperialism can still be seen in Africa today, including the legacy of colonial borders, ethnic conflict, and economic dependence on former colonial powers.
What made the story of imperialism in China different—what were its unique experiences?
The story of imperialism in China was different in that China had a long history as a powerful empire and was not easily dominated by European powers. China maintained its political independence but was forced to open its ports to trade with Western powers in the mid-19th century through a series of unequal treaties. The Opium Wars, which were fought between China and Britain, were a turning point in China's relationship with the West. The wars resulted in China being forced to cede Hong Kong to Britain and to allow foreign powers to establish spheres of influence within China. The Boxer Rebellion, a violent anti-foreign movement in China, was a response to the growing influence of foreign powers. The effects of imperialism in China can still be seen today, including the legacy of unequal treaties and the impact of Western ideas and technology on Chinese society.
What did these two areas of the world have in common during this period?
During this period, both Africa and China were subject to the imperialistic ambitions of European powers. European powers sought to exploit the resources of both regions and to establish spheres of influence. In both Africa and China, European powers used force and coercion to achieve their objectives, resulting in the exploitation and oppression of local populations. In addition, both regions experienced the introduction of Western ideas and technology, which had a lasting impact on their societies. The legacy of imperialism in both Africa and China can still be seen today, including the impact of colonial borders and the influence of Western culture.
Both regions were subjected to foreign dominance and exploitation, resulting in the loss of political, economic, and cultural autonomy. European powers sought to extract resources, establish trade networks, and expand their spheres of influence in both Africa and China.
What made the story of imperialism in Africa different were its unique experiences of colonization and the partitioning of the continent by European powers. Africa underwent what is known as the "Scramble for Africa," where European nations, such as Britain, France, Germany, Belgium, and Italy, competed for territorial control. The Berlin Conference of 1884-1885 formalized this division of Africa, disregarding existing African borders, cultures, and political systems. The effects of this colonization were far-reaching and included the exploitation of natural resources, forced labor, cultural disruption, and political subjugation.
In the case of China, imperialism manifested in a different manner. While China managed to maintain its political independence, it faced significant challenges due to European "spheres of influence." These spheres, established by countries like Britain, France, Germany, Russia, and Japan, granted these nations exclusive trading rights and economic control over specific regions of China. This resulted in the loss of Chinese sovereignty, economic exploitation, and unequal treaties, such as the Treaty of Nanjing (1842), which ended the First Opium War and forced China to cede Hong Kong to Britain.
Despite their unique experiences, both Africa and China shared common aspects during the period of imperialism. Additionally, both regions experienced resistance and attempts to regain independence, as well as the emergence of nationalist movements seeking to challenge imperial control. The legacy of imperialism in Africa and China continues to shape contemporary events, influencing issues of governance, economic disparities, and cultural dynamics in these regions today.
for more questions on economic
https://brainly.com/question/17996535
#SPJ8
Give possible reasons why going to church is not neglecting your culture Culture?
Going to church does not necessarily mean neglecting one's culture. Here are some possible reasons why going to church can be seen as compatible with and supportive of one's culture:
1. Religious Identity: For many individuals, religion is an integral part of their cultural identity. Going to church allows them to connect with their cultural heritage, traditions, and values that are intertwined with their religious beliefs.2. Cultural Expression: Church services often incorporate cultural elements such as music, art, language, and rituals that reflect the cultural diversity of the congregation. These expressions of culture can be celebrated and preserved within the context of religious worship.3. Community Engagement: Churches often serve as community centers where people come together to socialize, share experiences, and support one another. By participating in church activities, individuals can strengthen social bonds and foster a sense of belonging within their cultural community.4. Moral and Ethical Framework: Religious teachings, including those imparted in church settings, often provide a moral and ethical framework that guides individuals' behavior. These teachings can be influenced by cultural values and customs, promoting the preservation and transmission of cultural norms.5. Cultural Integration: Many churches promote the integration of faith and culture, encouraging individuals to bring their cultural heritage into their religious practice. This integration allows for a harmonious coexistence between religious beliefs and cultural customs.It is important to note that the relationship between religion, culture, and individual experiences can vary. Some individuals may find that their religious practices align closely with their cultural traditions, while others may navigate a balance between different aspects of their cultural and religious identities. Ultimately, the compatibility between going to church and embracing one's culture depends on the individual's perspective and the specific cultural context in question.
[tex]\huge{\mathfrak{\colorbox{black}{\textcolor{lime}{I\:hope\:this\:helps\:!\:\:}}}}[/tex]
♥️ [tex]\large{\underline{\textcolor{red}{\mathcal{SUMIT\:\:ROY\:\:(:\:\:}}}}[/tex]
What kinds of nuclear weapons resulted from the global confrontation between the two superpowers?
Answer:
During the global confrontation between the two superpowers, the United States and the Soviet Union, both countries developed and produced a wide variety of nuclear weapons. Some of the types of nuclear weapons that resulted include:
1. Atomic bombs: These were the first type of nuclear weapon developed during World War II. The United States dropped atomic bombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August 1945.
2. Hydrogen bombs: Also known as thermonuclear bombs, these are more powerful than atomic bombs. The United States and the Soviet Union both developed hydrogen bombs during the Cold War.
3. Intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs): These are long-range missiles that can be launched from one continent to another. Both the United States and the Soviet Union developed ICBMs during the Cold War.
4. Submarine-launched ballistic missiles (SLBMs): These are missiles that can be launched from submarines and are used as a second-strike capability. Both the United States and the Soviet Union developed SLBMs during the Cold War.
5. Tactical nuclear weapons: These are smaller nuclear weapons that are designed to be used on the battlefield. Both the United States and the Soviet Union had tactical nuclear weapons during the Cold War.
6. Multiple independently targetable reentry vehicles (MIRVs): These are missiles that can carry multiple warheads, each of which can be targeted independently. Both the United States and the Soviet Union developed MIRVs during the Cold War.
Overall, the global confrontation between the two superpowers led to the development of a diverse range of nuclear weapons, many of which are still in use today.
when calvin coolidge was president he passed a series of tax cuts that benefited who?
When Calvin Coolidge was president he passed a series of tax cuts that benefited various groups of people including wealthy individuals and businesses.
These tax cuts provided benefits to wealthy individuals and businesses by lowering the tax rates for those in the higher income brackets. The top marginal tax rate was reduced from 50% to 25% during Coolidge's presidency. This was a significant reduction that provided enormous benefits to the wealthy.
The reduced tax rates helped to stimulate economic growth and allowed businesses to keep more of their profits. This encouraged investment and expansion, which, in turn, created jobs and helped to reduce unemployment. The tax cuts were an essential factor in the growth of the American economy during the 1920s, which became known as the "Roaring Twenties."
In conclusion, the tax cuts introduced by Calvin Coolidge benefited wealthy individuals and businesses and were aimed at promoting economic growth and reducing the government's involvement in the economy. These policies stimulated the economy and helped to create jobs, leading to the growth of the American economy during the 1920s.
For more such questions on businesses visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28187988
#SPJ8
Help please here are the instructions in the pictures please I would appreciate your help.
rebelgrrl: Just read about the youth rebellion in the 1950s. So inspiring to see young people challenging societal norms! #YouthRebellion #BreakingBarriers
How to explain the conversationculturecrusader: rebelgrrl It was a time of immense change. But let's not forget the gender conflicts that also shaped the era. #GenderConflict #ChangingRoles
rebelgrrl: culturecrusader Absolutely! Women were pushing for equality and challenging traditional gender roles. They were trailblazers! #WomenEmpowerment #BreakingBoundaries
culturecrusader: rebelgrrl True, but popular culture played a big role in reinforcing those traditional norms. The media portrayed women as homemakers and objectified them. #MediaInfluence #Stereotypes
rebelgrrl: culturecrusader You're right, popular culture can be a double-edged sword. It both reflects and shapes society. We need to challenge those harmful portrayals and demand better representation. #RepresentationMatters #ChallengingNorms
Learn more about conversation
https://brainly.com/question/24549573
#SPJ1
After WW11 began, Jewish people were taken into custody and placed where?
During World War II, Jewish people were targeted by the Nazi regime in Germany and its occupied territories. As part of their systematic persecution and genocide, the Nazis implemented policies aimed at imprisoning and isolating Jews from the rest of society. The process began with the establishment of ghettos and later escalated to mass deportations and extermination camps.
1. Ghettos: In the early stages of the war, Jewish people were forced into segregated areas within cities called ghettos. These ghettos were typically overcrowded, impoverished, and surrounded by walls or barriers, effectively confining the Jewish population. Ghettos were established in cities such as Warsaw, Krakow, and Lodz, among others. Conditions within the ghettos were harsh, with limited access to food, medicine, and basic necessities.
2. Concentration camps: As the Nazi regime expanded its control, Jews and other persecuted groups were deported to concentration camps. These camps were initially intended as places of forced labor, where prisoners were subjected to inhumane conditions and extreme brutality. However, as the Holocaust progressed, concentration camps also became sites of mass murder through systematic execution methods, such as gas chambers.
It is important to note that the persecution of Jews extended beyond Germany and its occupied territories. Jewish communities in other European countries, such as Poland, Hungary, and France, also faced deportations and internment in ghettos and concentration camps.
The atrocities committed against Jewish people during World War II are now widely recognized as the Holocaust, one of the darkest chapters in human history. The systematic imprisonment, extermination, and genocide of millions of Jews remain a painful reminder of the horrors of Nazi Germany's policies and actions.
for more questions on territories
https://brainly.com/question/19213604
#SPJ8
-Abraham Lincoln, during the seventh debate with
Stephen A. Douglas
Which statement describes a similarity between source 1 and source 2?
A. Both are pieces of historical evidence.
B. Both could be secondary sources.
C. Both are primary sources.
D. Both show examples of chronological thinking.
Abraham Lincoln, during the seventh debate with Stephen A. Douglas. The statement which describe a similarity between source 1 and source 2 is (C) Both are primary sources.
To determine the similarity between source 1 and source 2 regarding Abraham Lincoln's seventh debate with Stephen A. Douglas, we need to analyze the characteristics of each source and identify the commonality.
Analyze source 1 - Determine its nature:The right answer is option C. Both are primary sources.
For more such question on Abraham Lincoln
https://brainly.com/question/7955162
#SPJ8
4. Where were many of the original blue-and-white ceramics created?
A. Tokyo
B. Saigon
C. Jingdezhen
D. Shanghai
chose the correct answer : An important 1662 Virginia law reinforced slavery by:
1. Increasing the amount of land under the headright system to 200 acres
2. Permitting the House of Burgesses to purchase slaves
3. Mandating that any child born to an enslaved woman would also be a slave themselves, making the condition of slavery inheritable
4. Prohibiting the movement of enslaved persons from Virginia to the West Indies
An important 1662 Virginia law reinforced slavery by Mandating that any child born to an enslaved woman would also be a slave themselves, making the condition of slavery inheritable
What is Slavery?The ownership of a person as property, particularly in relation to their labor, is known as slavery. Slavery often entails forced labor, with the person holding the slave in bondage determining the slave's place of employment and domicile.
A person is placed into slavery by enslavement. A significant Virginia statute from 1662 strengthened slavery by requiring that any children born to a slave woman be likewise slaves, making the status of slavery inheritable.
Learn more about slavery at;
https://brainly.com/question/9374853
#SPJ1
What it true in the Feudal system
People would exchange land in return for protection and loyalty
All the classes within feudalism were equal in power.
People could easily move up in social classes
Knights were only expected to protect their own land, they did not help others
Answer:
The statement that is true in the Feudal system is: People would exchange land in return for protection and loyalty.
In feudalism, land was the basis of wealth and power, and people exchanged land with others in return for protection, loyalty, and service. The feudal system was characterized by a hierarchy of social classes, with kings and lords at the top, followed by vassals, knights, and peasants. Each social class had its own rights and obligations, with those at the top responsible for providing protection and governance, and those at the bottom responsible for providing labor and tribute.
Contrary to the statement, all the classes within feudalism were not equal in power. Feudalism was a hierarchical system, with different classes having different levels of power and influence. The king or lord, who owned the land, had the most power and authority, while peasants and serfs, who worked the land, had little power or freedom.
Similarly, people could not easily move up in social classes in feudalism. Social mobility was limited, and most people were born into their social class and remained there for their entire lives.
Finally, knights were not only expected to protect their own land, but they were also expected to serve their lords and the king, and to help defend the realm as a whole.
