Answer:
c) It states why the topic is relevant to readers.
e) it explains how the authors came to study the subject.
Explanation:
The prologue's conclusion explains why the issue is interesting to readers and how the authors studied it. The writers said they wanted to know how sugar impacted the planet. They say sugar has caused ruin and spawned liberating ideals.Sugar has shaped the world as we know it, say the authors. By detailing sugar's history, they hope readers will comprehend how it has shaped our world.21. My friend and I A. was able to 22. Aster has long hair, A. haven't she 23. B. doesn't Aster C. doesn't she Chaltu is a good pianist, she plays it well. C. Although D. on the one hand A. Despite the fact that B. Due to the fact that carry a heavy load but now we can't. B. has been able to C. can D. were able to ? .24. She hopes well in her English exam. A. to do 25. My parents aren't able to afford the rent for us so we are going to be A. Illiterate A. impatiens D. home 26. You should always study before B. to go C. went A. going 27. Since he stopped A. to drink alcohol 30 TL C. homeless to bed. D. to young he felt well B. drinking water Hall D. does she B. to does B. to does C. doing D. do C. drinking D. drink alcohol 21. My friend and I A. was able to 22. Aster has long hair , A. haven't she 23 . B. doesn't Aster C. doesn't she Chaltu is a good pianist , she plays it well . C. Although D. on the one hand A. Despite the fact that B. Due to the fact that carry a heavy load but now we can't . B. has been able to C. can D. were able to ? .24 . She hopes well in her English exam . A. to do 25. My parents aren't able to afford the rent for us so we are going to be A. Illiterate A. impatiens D. home 26. You should always study before B. to go C. went A. going 27. Since he stopped A. to drink alcohol 30 TL C. homeless to bed . D. to young he felt well B. drinking water Hall D. does she B. to does B. to does C. doing D. do C. drinking D. drink alcohol
Answer:
21
Explanation:
21 =9
"Failings lead to success." How does President Reagan highlight this in his
speech at Moscow State University?
The inference is that President Reagan highlighted this in his speech at Moscow State University as he stated that failure is a tool that eventually leads one to be successful.
What is an inference?An inference simply means the conclusion that can be reduced based on the information given in a story.
In this case, the inference is that President Reagan highlighted this in his speech at Moscow State University as he stated that failure is a tool that eventually leads one to be successful.
He stated that it was important for everyone to join hands together to move the country forward.
Learn more about inference on:
brainly.com/question/25280941
#SPJ1
2.4. My father drops me at school. in passive voice simple present
Answer:
I really do not know
Explanation:
i jus really don't know
A nearby island had provided a/n ____________ for the Greek troops.
a. vacation
b. refuge
Answer:
I think it would be refuge
Question 2 of 15
Which sentence correctly uses one or more commas to set off a
nonrestrictive clause?
OA. Nela, who speaks Spanish perfectly, helped us talk to the store
owner.
OB. I decided to call Laticia who said she was available to watch the
cats.
OC. Tornadoes which form from wall clouds, are a major threat to
houses.
OD. She gave the flower to Dominic which shows that everyone
deserves love.
The sentence that correctly uses one or more commas to set off a nonrestrictive clause is Nela, who speaks Spanish perfectly, helped us talk to the store owner.
What is a non restrictive clause?A nonrestrictive clause is a noun that uses commas to add some information that are no in the sentence before. It give more additional details about the sentence.
Therefore, The sentence that correctly uses one or more commas to set off a nonrestrictive clause is Nela, who speaks Spanish perfectly, helped us talk to the store owner.
Learn more about nonrestrictive clause below.
https://brainly.com/question/177343
#SPJ1
In Black Boy, Wright describes events that transpire shortly after his father leaves the family.
How does Wright’s father’s departure affect Wright’s mother?
She must take on a full-time job and teach her sons to be responsible for themselves.
Wright’s mother makes light of the situation to keep her children calm.
Wright’s mother insists her children work to contribute to the household income.
She becomes depressed, and her sons suffer due to neglect.
In Black Boy, Wright’s father’s departure affects Wright’s mother as she becomes depressed, and her sons suffer due to neglect.
How does Wright’s father’s departure affect Wright’s mother?According to Wright's account in Black Boy, the events that took place soon after his father's departure had a negative impact on his mother, who thereafter neglected her sons.This is made clear in the book by Wright's description of how, after his father departed, they barely attended school because of a lack of funds.He occasionally has to work on whatever jobs are available.At some point, Wright's Mother became unhappy and finally experienced a paralytic stroke, along with his brother and her mother.Hence, the loss of Wright's father has an impact on Wright's mother, who suffers from depression and neglects her sons.
To learn more about Black Boy refer to :
https://brainly.com/question/19130663
#SPJ10
Answer:c
Explanation:
Please please help please please help me please
Answer:
A
Explanation:
I don't see the poem but I can see the difference in options. "feel," "fall," and "near" (option A) show type of words that can relate to the meaning of, or explain progress.
Hope this helps!
Read the excerpt from Studies of Trees, by Jacob Levison
The pines are widely distributed throughout the Northern Hemisphere, and include about 80 distinct species
with over 600 varieties. The species enumerated here are especially common in the eastern part of the United
States, growing either native in the forest or under cultivation in the parks. The pines form a very important
class of timber trees, and produce beautiful effects when planted in groups in the parks.
Which strategy does the author use in his choice of language to convey his message?
O facts and statements
sequence of events
O conclusive evidence
O persuasive influence
The strategy that the author use in his choice of language to convey his message is facts and statements. Thus, the correct option is A.
How explain your answer?The author uses various facts about the distribution of pines through the northern hemisphere with respect to the US, and other eastern parts. The author also describes its important class.
According to the context of the given passage, we can witness that there is a narration about the pines and we can see the approach which the author utilizes in his choice of language to describe his message.
Therefore, the correct option for this question is A.
To learn more about Pines trees, refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/14059119
#SPJ1
Which statement about online learners is true?
O Online learners have less difficulty making connections with classmates
than students who attend classes at the college.
O The experience for online learners is the same as the experience of students
who attend classes at the college.
O Online learners have to be more disciplined and independent than students
who attend classes at the college.
Online courses prevent online learners from communicating with other
students and participating in college life.
Answer:
In my opinion I the answer I would choose is the 4th one
Explanation:
Online courses prevent online learners from communicating with other
students and participating in college life.
Answer: first question is A second question is B on edge
Explanation:
Look at the examples in highlighted text in the passage. Which example show the Socratic teaching method Plato recorded?
The full question was no posted. But luckily I found it online.
Question:
Look at the examples in highlighted text in the passage. Which example shows the Socratic teaching method Plato recorded?
A.
Yes, Polemarchus, - Thrasymachus said . . . .
B.
Yes, said Cleitophon, interposing, . . . .
C.
I am only repeating what you are saying, . . . .
D.
To be sure, he replied, they are liable to err.
Republic of Plato
Plato was a student of the Greek philosopher, Socrates. He recorded many conversations between Socrates and the men of Athens in the 5th century A.D. These conversations often took a form that has come to be known as the Socratic Method, as Socrates asked questions and added examples to lead his companions to draw correct conclusions about such concepts as virtue, beauty, friendship, truth, and justice. In the following passage from The Republic, the topic is justice.
Great or small, never mind about that: we must first enquire whether what you are saying is the truth. Now we are both agreed that justice is interest of some sort, but you go on to say 'of the stronger'; about this addition I am not so sure, and must therefore consider further.
Proceed.
I will; and first tell me, Do you admit that it is just for subjects to obey their rulers?
I do.
But are the rulers of states absolutely infallible, or are they sometimes liable to err?
To be sure, he replied, they are liable to err.
Then in making their laws they may sometimes make them rightly, and sometimes not? True.
When they make them rightly, they make them agreeably to their interest; when they are mistaken, contrary to their interest; you admit that?
Yes.
And the laws which they make must be obeyed by their subjects, —and that is what you call justice?
Doubtless.
Then justice, according to your argument, is not only obedience to the interest of the stronger but the reverse?
What is that you are saying? he asked.
I am only repeating what you are saying, I believe. But let us consider: Have we not admitted that the rulers may be mistaken about their own interest in what they command, and also that to obey them is justice? Has not that been admitted?
Yes.
Then you must also have acknowledged justice not to be for the interest of the stronger, when the rulers unintentionally command things to be done which are to their own injury. For if, as you say, justice is the obedience which the subject renders to their commands, in that case, O wisest of men, is there any escape from the conclusion that the weaker are commanded to do, not what is for the interest, but what is for the injury of the stronger?
Nothing can be clearer, Socrates, said Polemarchus.
Yes, said Cleitophon, interposing, if you are allowed to be his witness.
But there is not need of any witness, said Polemarchus, for Thrasymachus himself acknowledges that rulers may sometimes command what is not for their own interest, and that for subjects to obey them is justice.
Yes, Polemarchus, - Thrasymachus said that for subjects to do what was commanded by their rulers is just.
Yes, Cleitophon, but he also said that justice is the interest of the stronger, and, while admitting both these propositions, he further acknowledged that the stronger may command the weaker who are his subjects to do what is not for his own interest; whence follows that justice is the injury quite as much as the interest of the stronger.
But, said Cleitophon, he meant by the interest of the stronger what the stronger thought to be his interest, —this was what the weaker had to do; and this was affirmed by him to be justice.
Those were not his words, rejoined Polemarchus.
Never mind, I replied, if he now says that they are, let us accept his statement. Tell me, Thrasymachus, I said, did you mean by justice what the stronger thought to be his interest, whether really so or not?
Certainly not, he said. Do you suppose that I call him who is mistaken the stronger at the time when he is mistaken?
Yes, I said, my impression was that you did so, when you admitted that the ruler was not infallible but might be sometimes mistaken.
Answer:
C is the illustration of the Socratic method of instruction that Plato noted.
The Socratic Method is based on a dialogue between instructor and pupils. The trainer takes the initiative by posing challenging questions.
Socrates used this type of inquiry to inspire people to question what they were given and to go beyond the apparent. The Socratic method is often used in medical and legal education today to help students understand more complicated subjects and/or ideas.
The instructor assists pupils in learning new ideas by starting with questions they already know and comprehend. This creates an environment in which students are truly learning rather than simply regurgitating information and forgetting it.
The family isn't too thrilled with her purchase of the house because...
Select one:
a. it will mean working twice as hard to pay the rent.
b. it is located in an all-white neighborhood.
c. it costs way too much.
d. they wanted to live in a condo.
e. it shattered Beneatha's and Walter's dreams.
The family isn't too thrilled with her purchase of the house because it is located in an all-white neighborhood.
What is the issue about?This question arises from the book titled "A Raisin in the Sun" by Lorraine Hansberry
It talks about some children whose mum bought a house to have a more better standard of living for their family but it was found to be in an all-white neighborhood.
The family is all black and they were not too thrilled with her purchase of the house because it is located in an all-white neighborhood.
Learn more about neighborhood from
https://brainly.com/question/7566863
#SPJ1
Read the excerpt from "The Environmental Ethic."
It is fashionable in some quarters to wave aside the small and obscure, the bugs and weeds, forgetting that an obscure moth from Latin America saved Australia’s pastureland from overgrowth by cactus, that the rosy periwinkle provided the cure for Hodgkin’s disease and childhood lymphocytic leukemia, that the bark of the Pacific yew offers hope for victims of ovarian and breast cancer, that a chemical from the saliva of leeches dissolves blood clots during surgery, and so on down a roster already grown long and illustrious despite the limited research addressed to it.
Which of the following claims is best supported by the evidence in this excerpt?
All species are worth protecting because even the small organisms contribute important functions in the environment.
Every effort should be made to protect each bug and weed species regardless of its potential to cause destruction.
All of the species that are now extinct or are becoming extinct could have cured a disease.
Only the species that can be used for medical purposes are worth protecting from extinction.
All of the species that are now extinct or are becoming extinct could have cured a disease is claims is best supported by the evidence in this excerpt.
Describe a claim?A claim is an assertion that is backed up by writing or an article. The evidence often used to support the allegation increases its credibility.
The text that follows discusses the value of various plant and animal species to the environment. Numerous advantages are offered by everything from a tiny bug to weeds, moths, rosy periwinkles, and the bark of Pacific yew.
Thus, option A is correct.
For more details about claim, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/9892623
#SPJ1
Gab and Greg ____________ nothing to do with the mischief done by Thirdy and Max
Gab and Greg had nothing anything to do with the naughtiness done by Thirdy and Max. While Thirdy and Max may have been involved in causing trouble or engaging in mischievous activities, Gab and Greg remained completely uninvolved.
The option (A) is correct.
They had no part in planning, executing, or participating in any mischief. Instead, they maintained their innocence and distanced themselves from the actions of Thirdy and Max.
Whether they were simply bystanders or intentionally avoided the misbehavior, Gab and Greg were not implicated in any way, making it clear that they were not responsible for the mischief that occurred.
Learn more about Greg:
https://brainly.com/question/32138601
#SPJ2
This question is not complete, Here I am attaching the complete question:
Gab and Greg ____________ nothing to do with the mischief done by Thirdy and Max.
(A) had
(B) Is
(C) there
please help me asap. We must abolish Daylight Saving Time. The practice of adjusting our clocks back in the fall and forward in the spring must not continue. First, studies show that eighty-eight per cent of all office workers have said that Daylight Saving Time makes them thirty-five per cent less productive. A policy so profoundly unpopular cannot possibly work for the good of society. Further, only wealthy capitalists promote Daylight Saving Time for their own self-serving needs. According to Karl Marx, the inventor of Marxism, the greed that these people demonstrate operates throughout society; thus, Daylight Saving Time can only help to support that greed. Finally, the fatigue that accompanies Daylight Saving Time causes such carelessness that it can only result in a plague of traffic accidents leading to severe injuries and perhaps even death. We must ask ourselves if death is worth the dubious benefits of this outdated course of action. In conclusion, the arguments I have presented demonstrate conclusively that the disastrous practice of Daylight Saving Time must end now.
Now that you've read the paragraph, look at it again. Consider how the writer argues his position. Especially, look for fallacies; you can use the video lecture or the list in the textbook to help you spot them.
Write a body paragraph of no less than three hundred (300) and no more than four hundred (400) words to respond to the sample paragraph. In your paragraph, let your reader know what you see in the sample; explain to your reader whether you find the argument convincing by showing the reader how logic works in it.
As always, take a look at the rubric you should see on this page as you work on your paragraph; make sure that your work contains all the elements that the rubric is looking for so that you can achieve maximum success in your paragraph.
The review of the argument of the writer is as follows:
He makes use of the bandwagon fallacy when he talks about the statistics of people who said Daylight Savings has made them less productive.The argument would have been more convincing if he had made use of good supporting details.What is an Argument?This refers to the use of words and logic in order to convince a person about a given perspective or position on a particular topic.
Hence, we can see that the writer makes an argument to abolish Daylight Savings and tries to be forceful about it, without the use of proper supporting details.
He does not include the source of the research that talks about the 88% of workers who said Daylight Savings reduced their productivity, and he also made use of the bandwagon fallacy.
Read more about bandwagon fallacy here:
https://brainly.com/question/1058000
#SPJ1
Question 10 of 10
Read this excerpt from the Declaration of Independence:
He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign
Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation
and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty &
perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and
totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.
Which rhetorical appeal is used here?
OA. Pathos
OB. Deductive logic
OC. Inductive logic
OD. Logos
In the excerpt from the Declaration of Independence, the writer uses pathos as a rhetorical appeal. Thus, option A pathos is the rhetorical device used in the text.
What is pathos?Pathos is one of the rhetorical appeals that are used in essays and articles to influence and convince the audience and readers by using certain terminologies that surge emotional feelings and connections.
The words tyranny, death, barbarous ages, desolation, and perfidy are used to provoke emotional appeal and thoughts in the readers. They are used deliberately in the text to evoke anger, pity, fear, and shame.
The passage does not use logos as no logical appeal is made. On the other hand, inductive and deductive logic is not rhetorical appeals.
Therefore, option A. pathos is used in the text.
Learn more about pathos here:
https://brainly.com/question/4166772
#SPJ1
Read the excerpt from act 1, scene 3, of julius caesar. cassius. am i not stayed for? tell me. cinna. yes, you are. o cassius, if you could but win the noble brutus to our party— cassius. be you content. good cinna, take this paper and look you lay it in the praetor’s chair, where brutus may but find it. and throw this in at his window. set this up with wax upon old brutus’ statue. all this done, repair to pompey’s porch, where you shall find us. is decius brutus and trebonius there? cinna. all but metellus cimber, and he’s gone to seek you at your house. well, i will hie, and so bestow these papers as you bade me. cassius. that done, repair to pompey’s theatre. what is cassius’s motivation for sending the messages? cassius wants to make sure that brutus is willing to obey his orders. cassius wants to have roman citizens read messages about brutus’ greatness. cassius wants to sway brutus with flattering messages to convince him to help kill caesar. cassius wants to alert brutus about the conspiracy against him.
The thing that lead to cassius’s motivation for sending the messages is cassius wants to have roman citizens read messages about brutus’ greatness.
What is motivation?Motivations is anything, someone that encourage or inspire someone to do what he is interested in or what he loves doing.
Therefore, The thing that lead to cassius’s motivation for sending the messages is cassius wants to have roman citizens read messages about brutus’ greatness.
Learn more about motivations below.
https://brainly.com/question/11871721
#SPJ1
Answer:
The thing that lead to cassius’s motivation for sending the messages is cassius wants to have roman citizens read messages about brutus’ greatness.
What is motivation?
Motivations is anything, someone that encourage or inspire someone to do what he is interested in or what he loves doing.
Therefore, The thing that lead to cassius’s motivation for sending the messages is cassius wants to have roman citizens read messages about brutus’ greatness.
Explanation:
How does this verb sound at the end conjugated in
simple past?
"Cancelled"
/t/
O /d/
O ed
O /id/
Answer:
Cancelled is correct...
100 Points brainliest 5-star +thanks! write a paragraph about two women that served during the American Revolutionary War (American Revolution)
The two women were Washington, Mary Ball and Deborah Sampson who served the American revolution war.
After Great Britain imposed the seven Coercive, or Intolerable Acts in the colonies, the American Revolutionary War erupted. Americans retaliated by organizing the Continental Congress and declaring war on the British. The conflict would not have progressed as far as it did without the widespread intellectual and monetary backing of both male and female residents of the colonies.
Washington, Mary Ball, this is a woman who, in my opinion, has been forgotten. Granted, her sole claim to fame is that she was George Washington's mother, and the connection was known to be tense at times. Mary Ball Washington, on the other hand, was widowed at the age of thirty-five and left with five children to raise. When George's father died when he was eleven years old, he let his mother's expectations to mold his character. Mrs. Washington was a strong-willed woman who commanded her household with sternness and common reason, instilling in her son the values of honor and integrity. This style of thinking shaped her son's personality, allowing him to lead by example.
Deborah Sampson, who disguised herself as a male and joined the Patriot army, became a hero of the American Revolution. She was the only woman to get a full military pension for her service in the Revolutionary army.
To learn more about American revolution war here : 'https://brainly.com/question/2066907'
#SPJ10
Read the passage from Sugar Changed the World.
The enslaved people on Saint Domingue were not merely fighting against the terrible conditions on the island. They were fighting for principles that they had learned from Europeans and Americans—from people similar to their own slave masters. The trio of great principles behind the French Revolution that began in 1789 consisted of "liberty, equality, fraternity" (brotherhood). As boats arrived in Saint Domingue from France, slaves learned that a revolution was going on in the name of human rights. Already, they'd been given a taste of great change because of a revolution closer to home. In 1779, a regiment of free blacks from Saint Domingue went to America to join in the fight for independence. They brought home with them the idea that "all men are created equal."
Two years after the meeting in Alligator Woods, on August 29, 1793, the leading French official on Saint Domingue realized that there was no point in opposing Toussaint and his armies. The slaves had freed themselves. And the following February, Paris agreed. The ideal of brotherhood announced by the revolutionaries of Paris finally included the sugar workers of Saint Domingue.
Which details do the authors include to support the claim in this passage? Select two options.
information about organizing the meeting in Alligator Woods
explanations of how revolutionary ideas spread to Saint Domingue
descriptions of the difficult conditions the enslaved people faced
examples of revolutionary ideas from other countries
specifics about how the English freed the enslaved people
Answer:
Information about organizing the meeting in Alligator Woodsexplanations of how revolutionary ideas spread to Saint DominiqueThe two details included in the passage to support the claim that enslaved people were fighting for principles of liberty, equality, and fraternity are explanations of how revolutionary ideas spread to Saint Domingue and examples of revolutionary ideas from other countries, which are the second and fourth options.
What is this passage about?The passage mentions that the enslaved people on Saint Domingue learned about the principles of liberty, equality, and fraternity from Europeans and Americans. The trio of great principles behind the French Revolution were "liberty, equality, and human rights." Saint-Domingue learned that a revolution was going on in the name of human rights. The passage describes how a regiment of free blacks from Saint Domingue went to America in 1779 to fight for independence and brought home with them the idea that "all men are created equal."
Hence, two details included in the passage to support the claim that enslaved people were fighting for principles of liberty, equality, and fraternity are explanations of how revolutionary ideas spread to Saint Domingue and examples of revolutionary ideas from other countries that are the second and fourth options.
Learn more about this passage here.
https://brainly.com/question/11495680
#SPJ5
Explain how Sartre might defend existentialism against the claim that it leaves a moral vacuum. Your answer should be at least 250 words.
Sartre defended existentialism against several charges which had been made against it.
How does Sartre defend existentialism?The ideology of existentialism promotes "quietism of sadness." They perceived it to be an inaction ideology. They perceived it as purely reflective and believed that it prevented people from committing to any path of action.Because they focus on all that is ludicrous and unpleasant about the human state, existentialists tend to be extremely gloomy.Existentialism places an undue emphasis on a person's personal decisions. It disregards humankind's shared solidarity.In the name of freedom of existential choice, existentialism appears to defend the most horrific atrocities. It denies the premise that morality is a gift from God.Concerning these concerns, Sartre responds by referring to his ideas of "abandonment," "anguish," and "despair."He employs these words as technical terms, and they have very precise connotations for him that are extremely distinct from their meanings in everyday speech. In common usage, these three phrases convey varying degrees of misery and powerlessness. Sartre believes that despite maintaining some of these negative connotations, they also have an upbeat quality that may not be apparent from a cursory reading of the text.The feeling of loss brought on by realizing there is no deity to compel our moral decisions or to provide us with instructions on how to earn salvation is referred to as "abandonment."The sense of this extra duty, which is an inevitable aspect of being human, is described by Sartre as "anguish." He likens it to the sense of accountability felt by a military commander whose choices have grave repercussions for the men under his command.According to Sartre, "despair" refers to the existentialist's perspective on the elements of the world that are beyond our control.Hence, this is how Sartre responds to critiques of his philosophy and defends Existentialism.
To learn more about Existentialism refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/8304509
#SPJ10
A boxing champion who had won one hundred consecutive matches might be described as invincible.
True or False
Answer:
true
Explanation:
just because someone is described as invincible, does not mean they are.
Mike Tyson was described as invincible numerous times by himself and the media. he won 50 matches (44 of those wins being KOs) and has only lost 6. even though he seemed and was described as invincible, he still lost those 6 times.
hope this helps:)
Select the correct answer.
Which excerpt from the passage best shapes the author's perspective on the misfortunes of the working class?
OA. "I watched people's feet from my cellar window, miners' feet in old shoes; soldiers' feet, well shod in government leather,
the shoes of women with the heels run down; the dilapidated shoes of children; barefooted boys." (paragraph 16)
O B.
"He was a man with a heart, who perhaps imagined his own mother imprisoned in a cellar with the sewer rats' union."
(paragraph 17)
OC.
"If I were out of this dungeon," thought I, "I would be fighting the human sewer rats anyway!" (paragraph 12)
"Boys," I said, "go back on your engine. Some day it will be all right." (paragraph 10)
OD.
Reset
Next
Answer:
"I watched people's feet from my cellar window, miners' feet in old shoes; soldiers' feet, well shod in government leather,
the shoes of women with the heels run down; the dilapidated shoes of children; barefooted boys." (paragraph 16)
Explanation:
Took the test and got it right.
Read the excerpt from "A Genetics of Justice” by Julia Alvarez.
Images of the dictator hung in every house next to the crucifix and Ia Virgencita with the declaration beneath: In this house Trujillo is Chief. The pale face of a young military man wearing a plumed bicorne hat and a gold–braided uniform looked down beneficently at my mother as she read her romantic novelas and dreamed of meeting the great love of her life. Sometimes in her daydreams, her great love wore the handsome young dictator’s face. Never having seen him, my mother could not know the portrait was heavily retouched.
What is the central idea of this paragraph?
The images of Trujillo portrayed him falsely.
Trujillo wore elaborate uniforms and headpieces.
Alvarez's mother wanted to meet Trujillo one day.
Young people dream about the person they will marry.
Answer:
The images of Trujillo portrayed him falsely.
The central idea of this given paragraph illustrates the images of Trujillo portrayed him falsely. Thus, the correct option is A.
What does the word central idea mean?The central idea of any play or poem may be defined as the prominent, unifying characteristic of the story, which secures together all of the other elements of imagination utilized by the author to convey the story.
The central idea of the text is to publicize how the dictator had control over people's lives. The central idea of this passage overall reveals the images that were portrayed by Trujillo which are not true with respect to the real world.
Therefore, it is well described above.
To learn more about "A Genetics of Justice”, refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/26110507
#SPJ1
Facts are different from opinions because facts are
personal.
objective.
subjective.
changeable
Answer:
i think subjective
:)
Explanation:
i think subjective because fact cant be changed
Answer:
Explanation:
The answer is actually B: Objective
edge 2023
What does President Lincoln describe in the lines in bold?
A.The readers who will likely disagree with his values
B. The people who rejected his offer of emancipation
C. The times he did not allow military emancipation
D. The lines in the Constitution that give him power
Answer:
he describes multiple things, I am guessing B
Explanation:
not sure ngl
Both armies had an unusual __________, however.
a. overconfidence
b. ability to recover quickly
c. number of casualties
So what is something you would want to do in the evening after work if we were dating or such ?
Thus, elderly patients, whose health may already be ____________, do not have the additional risk of lengthy exposure to anesthesia.
a. concerned
b. deteriorated
c. unstable
d. uncomfortable
Answer:
Unstable
Explanation:
I think it's this
The passage supports the inference that Unferth is
acclaimed.
frail.
petty.
religious
Read the passage from Beowulf. From where he crouched at the king's feet, Unferth, a son of Ecglaf’s, spoke contrary words. Beowulf’s coming, his sea-braving, made him sick with envy: he could not brook or abide the fact that anyone else alive under heaven might enjoy greater regard than he did: The passage supports the inference that Unferth is
1. acclaimed.
2. frail
3. petty.
4. religious.
The passage supports the inference that Unferth is petty. Thus, option "C" is correct.
Who is Unferth?Unferth (also Hunferth) is a character from the Old English epic poem Beowulf. The poem tells a story about a warrior named Beowulf, who arrives to help King Hrothgar and his people to fight Grendel.
In the poem, Unferth is Hrothgar's servant. His name is mentioned four times throughout the poem. Unferth is portrayed as a character of little importance when compared to the main characters.
The correct answer is, therefore, that this passage supports the inference that Unferth is petty.
To learn more about Beowulf click here:
https://brainly.com/question/24734700
#SPJ1
Answer:
The passage supports the inference that Unferth is
acclaimed.
frail.
petty. <<< CORRECT
religious.
Explanation:
EDGE 2022
Evaluate the style of Sutton’s draft. Which word best describes this style?
Informal
Formal
Semiformal
Skeptical
Sutton’s Draft
It is very rare to find a person who changes the way people view the world. Alexander Fleming was one such figure. What we know of today as penicillin, a cure for many infections, did not exist until 1928, when Fleming's brilliant and innovative mind discovered it.
As a young man, Fleming had a keen interest in the field of medicine. In 1906, he began working as a researcher at St. Mary's Hospital in London, England, under the guidance of Almroth Wright, a bacteriologist. During World War I, Fleming served in the Royal Army Medical Corps and worked with wounded soldiers. There, he realized that the liquid antiseptics used to treat wounds severely affected a person's ability to fight off bacterial infections. He believed that wounds should not be treated with antiseptics but rather kept clean and dry. However, his advice mostly went unheard.
In 1918, Fleming returned to St. Mary's as the assistant director of the St. Mary's Inoculation Department. Ten years later, in September 1928, he made a startling discovery related to the bacteria Staphylococcus aureus, which can cause harmful infections in humans. Fleming had left the bacteria unattended in a petri dish and noticed that it had developed an unknown mold around it. When he studied the mold, he was surprised to find that it was a type of antibiotic, a substance that can kill bacteria or stop it from growing. He named this discovery penicillin and spread word of its clinical potential to treat bacterial infections. With the help of scientists Howard Florey and Ernst Chain from the University of Oxford, he managed to stabilize and purify penicillin for public use.
The discovery of penicillin revolutionized the medical world and turned Fleming into a hero. In 1943, he was elected a Fellow of the Royal Society and received the knighthood one year later. In 1945, Fleming, Chain, and Florey were awarded the Nobel Prize for the discovery of penicillin and their contributions to the field of medicine.
In later years, Sir Alexander Fleming wrote numerous papers on bacteriology, chemotherapy, and immunology, which were published in medical and scientific journals all around the world. Fleming died in 1955 in London, but his name and contributions are celebrated to this day.
Answer:
a) Informal
Explanation:
Writing and Informal Writing, whereas a formal piece of writing is one that must be clear, correctly worded and well arranged. However, informal writing is typically associated with a more relaxed style and the use of more slangy terminology.
Answer:
Formal
Explanation:
