Answer: danger and gloom
A boxing champion who had won one hundred consecutive matches might be described as invincible.
True or False
Answer:
true
Explanation:
just because someone is described as invincible, does not mean they are.
Mike Tyson was described as invincible numerous times by himself and the media. he won 50 matches (44 of those wins being KOs) and has only lost 6. even though he seemed and was described as invincible, he still lost those 6 times.
hope this helps:)
reading and comprehension
Answer:
Reading comprehension is the ability to process text, understand its meaning, and to integrate with what the reader already knows.
How does this verb sound at the end conjugated in
simple past?
"Cancelled"
/t/
O /d/
O ed
O /id/
Answer:
Cancelled is correct...
According to E. M. Forster A work of literature must provide more than factual accuracy or vivid physical reality... it must tell us more than we already know. I agree with this statement because
Literature is read for various reasons. For example, some people read literature to understand other people better. Others read it for escapism. Entertainment is another common reason. All of these reasons depend on the author providing the reader with new information that is different to their own experiences of the world. If the author does not tell the reader more than he already knows, it is unlikely that the reader will be informed or entertained by the work.
How work of literature provide something new information?A work of literature must provide us with something new in order for the time spent in consuming it be worthwhile. The Book Thief tells us of hard facts but it also provides us with something else, how a life of young child harboring a wanted man is changed after the fact. In the Lord of the Rings, a fantasy world is so vivid and wide that you yourself can navigate through it.
Thus, this could be the answer.
To learn more about literature click here;
https://brainly.com/question/23046235
#SPJ1
2.4. My father drops me at school. in passive voice simple present
Answer:
I really do not know
Explanation:
i jus really don't know
Explain the wife's inductive reasoning for determining her husband's level of safety at work.
Premise 1: The wife assumes that her husband works a desk job.
Premise 2: _______________.
Conclusion: The wife assumes that her husband has a safe job.
The premise that explains the wife's inductive reasoning for determining her husband's level of safety at work will be,
The wife assumes that her husband's employer has insured him with retirement and health benefits.
What is inductive reasoning?When a person or an individual makes assumptions regarding an observation based on a general principle that is derived through the course of such assumptions in known as inductive reasoning.
In the given example, it can be concluded that the wife has derived a general principle that it is safe for her husband to continue his job as he has high level of personal and financial safety at his work.
Hence, the significance of inductive reasoning is aforementioned.
Learn more about the inductive reasoning here:
https://brainly.com/question/16685989
#SPJ1
Explain how Sartre might defend existentialism against the claim that it leaves a moral vacuum. Your answer should be at least 250 words.
Sartre defended existentialism against several charges which had been made against it.
How does Sartre defend existentialism?The ideology of existentialism promotes "quietism of sadness." They perceived it to be an inaction ideology. They perceived it as purely reflective and believed that it prevented people from committing to any path of action.Because they focus on all that is ludicrous and unpleasant about the human state, existentialists tend to be extremely gloomy.Existentialism places an undue emphasis on a person's personal decisions. It disregards humankind's shared solidarity.In the name of freedom of existential choice, existentialism appears to defend the most horrific atrocities. It denies the premise that morality is a gift from God.Concerning these concerns, Sartre responds by referring to his ideas of "abandonment," "anguish," and "despair."He employs these words as technical terms, and they have very precise connotations for him that are extremely distinct from their meanings in everyday speech. In common usage, these three phrases convey varying degrees of misery and powerlessness. Sartre believes that despite maintaining some of these negative connotations, they also have an upbeat quality that may not be apparent from a cursory reading of the text.The feeling of loss brought on by realizing there is no deity to compel our moral decisions or to provide us with instructions on how to earn salvation is referred to as "abandonment."The sense of this extra duty, which is an inevitable aspect of being human, is described by Sartre as "anguish." He likens it to the sense of accountability felt by a military commander whose choices have grave repercussions for the men under his command.According to Sartre, "despair" refers to the existentialist's perspective on the elements of the world that are beyond our control.Hence, this is how Sartre responds to critiques of his philosophy and defends Existentialism.
To learn more about Existentialism refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/8304509
#SPJ10
Question 10 of 10
Read this excerpt from the Declaration of Independence:
He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign
Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation
and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty &
perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and
totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.
Which rhetorical appeal is used here?
OA. Pathos
OB. Deductive logic
OC. Inductive logic
OD. Logos
In the excerpt from the Declaration of Independence, the writer uses pathos as a rhetorical appeal. Thus, option A pathos is the rhetorical device used in the text.
What is pathos?Pathos is one of the rhetorical appeals that are used in essays and articles to influence and convince the audience and readers by using certain terminologies that surge emotional feelings and connections.
The words tyranny, death, barbarous ages, desolation, and perfidy are used to provoke emotional appeal and thoughts in the readers. They are used deliberately in the text to evoke anger, pity, fear, and shame.
The passage does not use logos as no logical appeal is made. On the other hand, inductive and deductive logic is not rhetorical appeals.
Therefore, option A. pathos is used in the text.
Learn more about pathos here:
https://brainly.com/question/4166772
#SPJ1
18. What does it mean if you have a score of 50% in any category of the 16 Personalities Test?
O A. You're in the middle of the spectrum for that characteristic.
OB. You have a turbulent disposition.
O C. You need to retake the exam since the results aren't valid.
O D. You have an assertive disposition.
Answer:
option c you need to retake the exam since the results are not valid
Explanation:
because the other options are not related to the question
HELP
I need 80-100 words about The importance of the computer in your life
The importance of the computer in my life is very significant. I do lots of day-to-day work on my computer and often find myself using it for the majority of the day. My time spent consists of school work, games, and communicating with friends. But the biggest importance of computers in our lives is the amount of knowledge you can gain. You can learn almost anything with a computer, from tips on sky diving, how to ride a motorcycle, and even the steps to learning a new language. Even though many hate to admit it, technology and computers play a bulky part in our lives and drastically change our life, computers are very important in life!
So what is something you would want to do in the evening after work if we were dating or such ?
Both armies had an unusual __________, however.
a. overconfidence
b. ability to recover quickly
c. number of casualties
Gab and Greg ____________ nothing to do with the mischief done by Thirdy and Max
Gab and Greg had nothing anything to do with the naughtiness done by Thirdy and Max. While Thirdy and Max may have been involved in causing trouble or engaging in mischievous activities, Gab and Greg remained completely uninvolved.
The option (A) is correct.
They had no part in planning, executing, or participating in any mischief. Instead, they maintained their innocence and distanced themselves from the actions of Thirdy and Max.
Whether they were simply bystanders or intentionally avoided the misbehavior, Gab and Greg were not implicated in any way, making it clear that they were not responsible for the mischief that occurred.
Learn more about Greg:
https://brainly.com/question/32138601
#SPJ2
This question is not complete, Here I am attaching the complete question:
Gab and Greg ____________ nothing to do with the mischief done by Thirdy and Max.
(A) had
(B) Is
(C) there
Walter tells the family that he plans to...
Select one:
a. put on a show for the Man.
b. get as much money as possible out of Lindner.
c. beat the hell out of Lindner and steal his money.
d. All of the above
e. Only A & B
Explanation:
get as much money as possible out of linder
What does it mean if someone say they are giving up slowly?
Answer:
It means they are losing hope/willingness slowly
Explanation:
Please please help please please help me please
Answer:
A
Explanation:
I don't see the poem but I can see the difference in options. "feel," "fall," and "near" (option A) show type of words that can relate to the meaning of, or explain progress.
Hope this helps!
please help me asap. We must abolish Daylight Saving Time. The practice of adjusting our clocks back in the fall and forward in the spring must not continue. First, studies show that eighty-eight per cent of all office workers have said that Daylight Saving Time makes them thirty-five per cent less productive. A policy so profoundly unpopular cannot possibly work for the good of society. Further, only wealthy capitalists promote Daylight Saving Time for their own self-serving needs. According to Karl Marx, the inventor of Marxism, the greed that these people demonstrate operates throughout society; thus, Daylight Saving Time can only help to support that greed. Finally, the fatigue that accompanies Daylight Saving Time causes such carelessness that it can only result in a plague of traffic accidents leading to severe injuries and perhaps even death. We must ask ourselves if death is worth the dubious benefits of this outdated course of action. In conclusion, the arguments I have presented demonstrate conclusively that the disastrous practice of Daylight Saving Time must end now.
Now that you've read the paragraph, look at it again. Consider how the writer argues his position. Especially, look for fallacies; you can use the video lecture or the list in the textbook to help you spot them.
Write a body paragraph of no less than three hundred (300) and no more than four hundred (400) words to respond to the sample paragraph. In your paragraph, let your reader know what you see in the sample; explain to your reader whether you find the argument convincing by showing the reader how logic works in it.
As always, take a look at the rubric you should see on this page as you work on your paragraph; make sure that your work contains all the elements that the rubric is looking for so that you can achieve maximum success in your paragraph.
The review of the argument of the writer is as follows:
He makes use of the bandwagon fallacy when he talks about the statistics of people who said Daylight Savings has made them less productive.The argument would have been more convincing if he had made use of good supporting details.What is an Argument?This refers to the use of words and logic in order to convince a person about a given perspective or position on a particular topic.
Hence, we can see that the writer makes an argument to abolish Daylight Savings and tries to be forceful about it, without the use of proper supporting details.
He does not include the source of the research that talks about the 88% of workers who said Daylight Savings reduced their productivity, and he also made use of the bandwagon fallacy.
Read more about bandwagon fallacy here:
https://brainly.com/question/1058000
#SPJ1
Understanding idioms relies on the reader's knowledge of the literal denotation of the words,
not their connotation.
True or false ?
False
True
Answer:
ig true
Explanation:
Read the excerpt from "Choice: A Tribute to Dr. Martin
Luther King, Jr." by Alice Walker.
The public acts of Dr. King you know. They are visible
all around you. His voice you would recognize sooner
than any other voice you have heard in this century-
this in spite of the fact that certain municipal libraries,
like the one in downtown Jackson, do not carry
recordings of his speeches, and the librarians chuckle
cruelly when asked why they do not.
Mark this and return
What is the effect of the rhetorical appeal in this
excerpt?
OIt accuses the reader of not being familiar with
King's work.
OIt asks the reader to question why King is not
respected as a leader.
OIt explains why people have not heard famous
speeches.
It questions the knowledge of the people who work
in libraries.
Answer:
Olt accuses the reader of not being familiar with King's work
Explanation:
When you read the excerpt, the beginning starts off by telling you that Dr. King's works are all around you, basically informing you about him. This shows that he assumes you dont know much about Dr. King.
Answer:
its b, the other answer is wrong, now trust me if you want
Read the excerpt from "A Genetics of Justice” by Julia Alvarez.
Images of the dictator hung in every house next to the crucifix and Ia Virgencita with the declaration beneath: In this house Trujillo is Chief. The pale face of a young military man wearing a plumed bicorne hat and a gold–braided uniform looked down beneficently at my mother as she read her romantic novelas and dreamed of meeting the great love of her life. Sometimes in her daydreams, her great love wore the handsome young dictator’s face. Never having seen him, my mother could not know the portrait was heavily retouched.
What is the central idea of this paragraph?
The images of Trujillo portrayed him falsely.
Trujillo wore elaborate uniforms and headpieces.
Alvarez's mother wanted to meet Trujillo one day.
Young people dream about the person they will marry.
Answer:
The images of Trujillo portrayed him falsely.
The central idea of this given paragraph illustrates the images of Trujillo portrayed him falsely. Thus, the correct option is A.
What does the word central idea mean?The central idea of any play or poem may be defined as the prominent, unifying characteristic of the story, which secures together all of the other elements of imagination utilized by the author to convey the story.
The central idea of the text is to publicize how the dictator had control over people's lives. The central idea of this passage overall reveals the images that were portrayed by Trujillo which are not true with respect to the real world.
Therefore, it is well described above.
To learn more about "A Genetics of Justice”, refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/26110507
#SPJ1
Why is a teacher's feedback valuable?
A.Teachers make good listeners.
B.Your teacher decides your grade.
C.A teacher is also a reader.
D.Every teacher is an expert writer.
Note: B and c are wrong.
What does President Lincoln describe in the lines in bold?
A.The readers who will likely disagree with his values
B. The people who rejected his offer of emancipation
C. The times he did not allow military emancipation
D. The lines in the Constitution that give him power
Answer:
he describes multiple things, I am guessing B
Explanation:
not sure ngl
Select the correct answer.
Which excerpt from the passage best shapes the author's perspective on the misfortunes of the working class?
OA. "I watched people's feet from my cellar window, miners' feet in old shoes; soldiers' feet, well shod in government leather,
the shoes of women with the heels run down; the dilapidated shoes of children; barefooted boys." (paragraph 16)
O B.
"He was a man with a heart, who perhaps imagined his own mother imprisoned in a cellar with the sewer rats' union."
(paragraph 17)
OC.
"If I were out of this dungeon," thought I, "I would be fighting the human sewer rats anyway!" (paragraph 12)
"Boys," I said, "go back on your engine. Some day it will be all right." (paragraph 10)
OD.
Reset
Next
Answer:
"I watched people's feet from my cellar window, miners' feet in old shoes; soldiers' feet, well shod in government leather,
the shoes of women with the heels run down; the dilapidated shoes of children; barefooted boys." (paragraph 16)
Explanation:
Took the test and got it right.
Facts are different from opinions because facts are
personal.
objective.
subjective.
changeable
Answer:
i think subjective
:)
Explanation:
i think subjective because fact cant be changed
Answer:
Explanation:
The answer is actually B: Objective
edge 2023
Read the excerpt from "The Environmental Ethic."
It is fashionable in some quarters to wave aside the small and obscure, the bugs and weeds, forgetting that an obscure moth from Latin America saved Australia’s pastureland from overgrowth by cactus, that the rosy periwinkle provided the cure for Hodgkin’s disease and childhood lymphocytic leukemia, that the bark of the Pacific yew offers hope for victims of ovarian and breast cancer, that a chemical from the saliva of leeches dissolves blood clots during surgery, and so on down a roster already grown long and illustrious despite the limited research addressed to it.
Which of the following claims is best supported by the evidence in this excerpt?
All species are worth protecting because even the small organisms contribute important functions in the environment.
Every effort should be made to protect each bug and weed species regardless of its potential to cause destruction.
All of the species that are now extinct or are becoming extinct could have cured a disease.
Only the species that can be used for medical purposes are worth protecting from extinction.
All of the species that are now extinct or are becoming extinct could have cured a disease is claims is best supported by the evidence in this excerpt.
Describe a claim?A claim is an assertion that is backed up by writing or an article. The evidence often used to support the allegation increases its credibility.
The text that follows discusses the value of various plant and animal species to the environment. Numerous advantages are offered by everything from a tiny bug to weeds, moths, rosy periwinkles, and the bark of Pacific yew.
Thus, option A is correct.
For more details about claim, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/9892623
#SPJ1
What is the best description of realistic fiction?
•
Answer:
REALISTIC FICTION is a genre consisting of stories that could have actually occurred to people or animals in a believable setting. These stories resemble real life and fictional characters within these stories react similarly to real people.
In Black Boy, Wright describes events that transpire shortly after his father leaves the family.
How does Wright’s father’s departure affect Wright’s mother?
She must take on a full-time job and teach her sons to be responsible for themselves.
Wright’s mother makes light of the situation to keep her children calm.
Wright’s mother insists her children work to contribute to the household income.
She becomes depressed, and her sons suffer due to neglect.
In Black Boy, Wright’s father’s departure affects Wright’s mother as she becomes depressed, and her sons suffer due to neglect.
How does Wright’s father’s departure affect Wright’s mother?According to Wright's account in Black Boy, the events that took place soon after his father's departure had a negative impact on his mother, who thereafter neglected her sons.This is made clear in the book by Wright's description of how, after his father departed, they barely attended school because of a lack of funds.He occasionally has to work on whatever jobs are available.At some point, Wright's Mother became unhappy and finally experienced a paralytic stroke, along with his brother and her mother.Hence, the loss of Wright's father has an impact on Wright's mother, who suffers from depression and neglects her sons.
To learn more about Black Boy refer to :
https://brainly.com/question/19130663
#SPJ10
Answer:c
Explanation:
Look at the examples in highlighted text in the passage. Which example show the Socratic teaching method Plato recorded?
The full question was no posted. But luckily I found it online.
Question:
Look at the examples in highlighted text in the passage. Which example shows the Socratic teaching method Plato recorded?
A.
Yes, Polemarchus, - Thrasymachus said . . . .
B.
Yes, said Cleitophon, interposing, . . . .
C.
I am only repeating what you are saying, . . . .
D.
To be sure, he replied, they are liable to err.
Republic of Plato
Plato was a student of the Greek philosopher, Socrates. He recorded many conversations between Socrates and the men of Athens in the 5th century A.D. These conversations often took a form that has come to be known as the Socratic Method, as Socrates asked questions and added examples to lead his companions to draw correct conclusions about such concepts as virtue, beauty, friendship, truth, and justice. In the following passage from The Republic, the topic is justice.
Great or small, never mind about that: we must first enquire whether what you are saying is the truth. Now we are both agreed that justice is interest of some sort, but you go on to say 'of the stronger'; about this addition I am not so sure, and must therefore consider further.
Proceed.
I will; and first tell me, Do you admit that it is just for subjects to obey their rulers?
I do.
But are the rulers of states absolutely infallible, or are they sometimes liable to err?
To be sure, he replied, they are liable to err.
Then in making their laws they may sometimes make them rightly, and sometimes not? True.
When they make them rightly, they make them agreeably to their interest; when they are mistaken, contrary to their interest; you admit that?
Yes.
And the laws which they make must be obeyed by their subjects, —and that is what you call justice?
Doubtless.
Then justice, according to your argument, is not only obedience to the interest of the stronger but the reverse?
What is that you are saying? he asked.
I am only repeating what you are saying, I believe. But let us consider: Have we not admitted that the rulers may be mistaken about their own interest in what they command, and also that to obey them is justice? Has not that been admitted?
Yes.
Then you must also have acknowledged justice not to be for the interest of the stronger, when the rulers unintentionally command things to be done which are to their own injury. For if, as you say, justice is the obedience which the subject renders to their commands, in that case, O wisest of men, is there any escape from the conclusion that the weaker are commanded to do, not what is for the interest, but what is for the injury of the stronger?
Nothing can be clearer, Socrates, said Polemarchus.
Yes, said Cleitophon, interposing, if you are allowed to be his witness.
But there is not need of any witness, said Polemarchus, for Thrasymachus himself acknowledges that rulers may sometimes command what is not for their own interest, and that for subjects to obey them is justice.
Yes, Polemarchus, - Thrasymachus said that for subjects to do what was commanded by their rulers is just.
Yes, Cleitophon, but he also said that justice is the interest of the stronger, and, while admitting both these propositions, he further acknowledged that the stronger may command the weaker who are his subjects to do what is not for his own interest; whence follows that justice is the injury quite as much as the interest of the stronger.
But, said Cleitophon, he meant by the interest of the stronger what the stronger thought to be his interest, —this was what the weaker had to do; and this was affirmed by him to be justice.
Those were not his words, rejoined Polemarchus.
Never mind, I replied, if he now says that they are, let us accept his statement. Tell me, Thrasymachus, I said, did you mean by justice what the stronger thought to be his interest, whether really so or not?
Certainly not, he said. Do you suppose that I call him who is mistaken the stronger at the time when he is mistaken?
Yes, I said, my impression was that you did so, when you admitted that the ruler was not infallible but might be sometimes mistaken.
Answer:
C is the illustration of the Socratic method of instruction that Plato noted.
The Socratic Method is based on a dialogue between instructor and pupils. The trainer takes the initiative by posing challenging questions.
Socrates used this type of inquiry to inspire people to question what they were given and to go beyond the apparent. The Socratic method is often used in medical and legal education today to help students understand more complicated subjects and/or ideas.
The instructor assists pupils in learning new ideas by starting with questions they already know and comprehend. This creates an environment in which students are truly learning rather than simply regurgitating information and forgetting it.
The family isn't too thrilled with her purchase of the house because...
Select one:
a. it will mean working twice as hard to pay the rent.
b. it is located in an all-white neighborhood.
c. it costs way too much.
d. they wanted to live in a condo.
e. it shattered Beneatha's and Walter's dreams.
The family isn't too thrilled with her purchase of the house because it is located in an all-white neighborhood.
What is the issue about?This question arises from the book titled "A Raisin in the Sun" by Lorraine Hansberry
It talks about some children whose mum bought a house to have a more better standard of living for their family but it was found to be in an all-white neighborhood.
The family is all black and they were not too thrilled with her purchase of the house because it is located in an all-white neighborhood.
Learn more about neighborhood from
https://brainly.com/question/7566863
#SPJ1
Question 2 of 15
Which sentence correctly uses one or more commas to set off a
nonrestrictive clause?
OA. Nela, who speaks Spanish perfectly, helped us talk to the store
owner.
OB. I decided to call Laticia who said she was available to watch the
cats.
OC. Tornadoes which form from wall clouds, are a major threat to
houses.
OD. She gave the flower to Dominic which shows that everyone
deserves love.
The sentence that correctly uses one or more commas to set off a nonrestrictive clause is Nela, who speaks Spanish perfectly, helped us talk to the store owner.
What is a non restrictive clause?A nonrestrictive clause is a noun that uses commas to add some information that are no in the sentence before. It give more additional details about the sentence.
Therefore, The sentence that correctly uses one or more commas to set off a nonrestrictive clause is Nela, who speaks Spanish perfectly, helped us talk to the store owner.
Learn more about nonrestrictive clause below.
https://brainly.com/question/177343
#SPJ1
