The equal protection standard is generally judged in a lenient manner. However, laws that discriminate regarding race are made to undergo a much more rigorous test.
What is equal protection standard?According to the principle of equal protection, no one may be denied the same access to the legal system. A person must be treated equally to others in comparable situations by the state's governing body. In addition, no state may take away someone's life, liberty, or property without providing them with a fair trial or deny them the equal protection of the law if they are a resident of its territory. No State shall pass or enforce any legislation that restricts the rights or privileges of US citizens.The government is prohibited from enacting laws or adopting official measures that differ in how they treat individuals in identical situations or groups of individuals under the equal protection clause of the constitution.
To learn more about equal protection standard refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/28474671
#SPJ4
which of the following statements about theorists during the democratization of landscapes is untrue
The untrue statement about theorists during the democratization of landscapes is John ruskin put forth the nation of transcendentalism.
Being one of the earliest philosophical currents to arise in the United States, transcendentalism marks an important early period in the development of American philosophy. Its proponents emphasize subjective intuition above empirical empiricism and hold that people are capable of coming up with wholly original insights with no regard for or deference to earlier thinkers. It emerged in response, as a kind of protest against the period's prevalent intellectualism and spirituality. The Harvard Unitarianism, an early nineteenth-century religious movement that originated in Boston, is closely tied to transcendentalism. Transcendentalism did not oppose Unitarianism; rather, it emerged as a natural result of Unitarianism's emphasis on the importance of the free exercise of religion and the value of reasoned thought. Divinity School's teachings on Unitarian doctrine were closely related.
Learn more about transcendentalism here
https://brainly.com/question/2571365
#SPJ4
What institution is created by a society to create and enforce public policies?
Government institution is created by a society to create and enforce public policies.
The people hold the utmost power in government, but the Creator is ultimately responsible for its legitimacy. Government officials will rule with humility and restraint if they recognise and pay attention to the source of their power and authority. Federalism is a form of governance in which a central governing body and its corporation political subdivisions share sovereignty in accordance with the constitution. It is founded on democratic principles and institutions, where national and state governments share executive authority to form a federation. The state of human society has changed from one of savagery to one of civilization. In the process of social evolution, he distinguished several stages, the primitive, the militant, and the industrial.
To know more about corporation refer :
brainly.com/question/21928572
#SPJ4
there has been a decades-long debate about whether representations of violence in various forms of mass media cause real-world violence. which of the following statements about that debate is accurate?
While the effect of violence on television is still up for discussion, research indicates that video games frequently result in real-world violence.
Every significant study has found a clear correlation between watching violent television and playing violent video games and actual violence. In general, violent criminals have a history of watching more violent media than the public in general does. Major studies have never found a connection between watching violent media and any type of violence in real life. In general, the years when there were the most violent depictions in the media saw a decline in violent crime in the United States. It has been the trend in the media sector over the last 40 years. The number of people and businesses with ownership has increased dramatically. Greater numbers of people and businesses now have a little more of the ownership.
Learn more about violence here
https://brainly.com/question/8075105
#SPJ4
The FDA's regulations related to electronic records and electronic signatures (21 CFR Part 11) are intended to: Allow the use of electronic documents and signatures in the regulatory process for drugs and devices.
The FDA's regulations related to electronic records and electronic signatures (21 CFR Part 11) are intended to allow the use of electronic documents and signatures in the regulatory process for drugs and devices. Here are some key points about the regulations:
What is FDA regulation?The regulations establish the criteria under which the FDA considers electronic records, electronic signatures, and handwritten signatures executed to electronic records to be trustworthy, reliable, and equivalent to paper records and handwritten signatures executed on paper.They apply to records in electronic form that are created, modified, maintained, archived, retrieved, or transmitted under any records requirements set forth in FDA regulations.They also apply to electronic signatures and handwritten signatures executed to electronic records.The regulation also includes security requirement for electronic records and electronic signatureThe regulations also provide for FDA inspection of such records, electronic signatures, and the systems used to create, modify, maintain, archive, retrieve, or transmit them.It is important to note that these regulations are intended to ensure the integrity, confidentiality, and availability of electronic records, and to protect against their falsification. Therefore, all regulated industries that are required to maintain records under FDA regulations must comply with 21 CFR Part 11.To learn more about FDA regulation refer:
brainly.com/question/1317177
#SPJ4
identify the competing roles society places on law enforcement officers and how that can influence behavior
The conflicting expectations society has of law enforcement officials and how it could affect their behaviour: Crime fighter vs. Public Servant
Conflicts over meetings arise when competing events try to occupy the same time slot in your calendar. While we're concentrating on meetings in this post, there are other types of conflicts that might arise with regard to scheduling, such as appointments, events, crises, daily routines, and task work. Because you are unsure of what to do or what to believe and are unable to decide between highly varied thoughts, sentiments, or beliefs: Both politicians and regular people tend to have mixed feelings about gaming. The personalities of high-conflict individuals (HCPs) are high-conflict. This indicates that they frequently engage in all-or-nothing thinking, uncontrolled emotions, extreme conduct or threats, and an obsession with blaming others.
Learn more about conflicting here
https://brainly.com/question/23050407
#SPJ4
TO1: Identify the competing roles society places on law enforcement officers and how that can influence behavior
Lacey files a civil suit against Mischa. To succeed, Lacey must prove her case
a. beyond a reasonable doubt.
b. by a preponderance of the evidence.
c. through a scintilla of evidence.
d. to the extent promised in her attorney's opening statement.
Lacey files a civil suit against Mischa. To succeed, Lacey must prove her case- b) by a preponderance of the evidence. One kind of evidential criterion utilized in a burden of proof assessment is the preponderance of the evidence.
According to the preponderance standard, the proof burden is satisfied when the party presenting it persuades the fact-finder that the claim has a higher than 50% chance of being true. In a civil trial, the proof burden is this. To establish anything by a majority of the evidence is to merely demonstrate that it is more probable than not. Do you think that each part of his or her [assertion] is more probably correct than false in view of the evidence as well as the law, to put it another way.
To know more about evidence:
https://brainly.com/question/14370298
#SPJ4
What purpose does it serve if we punish individuals who break the law?
Answer:
They learn from their mistakes and depending on how severe the punishment is, this prevents other people from breaking the law which will essentially make the world a safer place to live in, without people being constantly in fear that something could happen to them.
Explanation:
Punishing individuals who break the law serves several purposes, including:
Deterrence: Punishment serves as a deterrent to others who may be considering breaking the law. The fear of punishment can discourage people from committing crimes.
Rehabilitation: Punishment can also serve as a means of rehabilitating offenders, helping them to understand the impact of their actions and encouraging them to change their behavior.
Retribution: Punishment can also be seen as a way of holding offenders accountable for their actions and providing a sense of justice for victims and society as a whole.
Protection: Punishment can also serve to protect society by removing dangerous offenders from the community, either through imprisonment or other forms of punishment.
Public safety: Punishing individuals who break the law can also help maintain public safety by removing individuals who pose a threat to society.
Restitution: Punishment can also include restitution, which would be a form of compensation to the victims of the crime.
It is important to note that punishment should be proportionate to the crime committed and should aim to achieve a balance between punishment, rehabilitation, and reintegration of the offender into society.
Shortly after his election, Jackson became an advocate of what he called the _____________ ___________, or a heavy rotation of government officials after an election.
Shortly after his election, Jackson became an advocate of what he called the Spoils system, or a heavy rotation of government officials after an election.
What is Spoils system?The spoils system, also known as the patronage system, is a process whereby the political party that wins an election rewards its campaign workers and other active supporters by appointing them to government positions and providing them with other favors. Jackson supported the idea of switching up those in elected positions. Additionally called the "spoils system," this was. Jackson maintained the idea that public offices should be rotated among party members in his first annual message to Congress, saying that doing so would assist the country advance its republican values. The method of selecting and removing federal employees when presidential administrations changed in the 19th century was referred to as "The Spoils System." It is also referred to as a patronage system.To learn more about Spoils system refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/10318684
#SPJ4
system in which government owns and controls some factors of production
Command economies is the system in which government owns and controls some factors of production.
three economic problems of "what to create," "how to produce it," and "for whom to produce it" are all addressed by the government in command economies. Command economies are frequently linked to authoritarianism, socialism, and communism.
A command economy is one in which the production and distribution of products and services are centrally planned and managed by the government. Typically, this sort of economy is linked to socialist or communist political ideologies. All economic choices are made by the government, and there is little to no private property ownership.
To know more about command economy click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/13719381#
#SPJ4
question a resident of city a (located in the northern district of state a) brought a diversity action against a resident of city b (located in the eastern district of state b). the cause of action arose in city b. the defendant commutes daily from his home in city b to his office in city a and would find it much more convenient to litigate the action there than in city c, where the appropriate court for the eastern district of state b is located. the plaintiff would also find it more convenient to litigate in city a, but will go to city c if necessary. may the action be litigated in city a?
It is possible that the diversity action brought by the resident of City A against the resident of City B could be litigated in City A, but it would depend on the specific circumstances of the case and the rules of the court where the action is brought.
What are the some jurisdiction points to consider?The general rule in cases involving diversity jurisdiction is that the action must be brought in the district where the defendant resides.However, there may be exceptions to this rule if the defendant is also a resident of the district where the cause of action arose.In this case, the defendant resides in City B, which is located in the Eastern District of State B, and the cause of action arose in City B.The defendant's daily commute from City B to City A may be considered as evidence that they are also a resident of the district where the action is brought.If the defendant is considered a resident of the district where the action is brought, the court may have discretion to hear the case in City A to accommodate the defendant's convenience.The plaintiff's preference to litigate in City A also could be taken into account, but the defendant's convenience should be given greater weight.In any case, the final decision would be up to the court where the action is brought.It is worth noting that the final decision would be subject to the specific jurisdiction of the court and the rules of the court where the action is brought. It is always best to consult with a lawyer familiar with the jurisdiction before making any assumptions.To learn more about jurisdiction refer:
brainly.com/question/2067793
#SPJ4
law intended to assimilate native americans into american culture
Native Americans had to sign up with the Office of Indian Affairs, now known as the Bureau of Indian Affairs, in order to get their allotment.
Native Americans had to sign up with the Office of Indian Affairs, now known as the Bureau of Indian Affairs, in order to get their allotment. By enrolling, the person gave the office their identity and had their name placed on the "Dawes rolls," which let government organisations determine whether or not that person was qualified to get their allocation. Before the Dawes Act, Native Americans were in possession of about 150 million acres of land, but most of it was lost as a result of allotment partitions and surplus land sales. Tribes were undervalued when they received compensation for their land. Native Americans received limited compensation, were used to spending money, and used the majority of what they did receive rapidly.
To know more about Bureau refer :
brainly.com/question/28041514
#SPJ4
which of the following conditions is/are not necessary to justify the use of t procedures in a significance test for the slope of a regression line?
The correct response is D. I and II only. The following circumstances would be necessary to support the use of t for the significance test: l and ll only
The results of statistical tests for statistical significance show whether apparent disparities in assessment results are the product of sampling mistake or random chance. Because they don't represent actual differences, such "insignificant" results ought to be disregarded. ("Significance" in this context does not imply any assessment of absolute magnitude or instructional applicability. It merely relates to the difference's statistical makeup and suggests that it is significant enough to mention.) Select the report you are interested in, then select the Significance Test tab. You must first choose the variable you want to test and the standard by which you want to test it. It must have more than one value since you will compare or "look across" the range of values for the criterion. For instance, you can examine various years or jurisdictions. You may, for instance, search for a variable across jurisdictions or years. You can browse through all of the possible values for a certain variable, such as "male" and "female" within "gender." Following the selection of the primary criterion, each additional criterion must have a single value.
Learn more about significance test here
https://brainly.com/question/11656805
#SPJ4
Which of the following conditions is/are necessary to justify the use of t procedures in a significance test for the slope of a regression line? (4 points)
I. For each given value of x, the values of the response variable y are Normally distributed.
II. For each given value of x, the values of the response variable y are independent.
III. For each given value of x, the standard deviation of y is the same.
A. I only
B. II only
C. III only
D. I and II only
E. I, II, and III
Labor law pertains to the rights of workers as:
Answer:
Labor law pertains to the rights of workers as: Groups
Explanation:
Hope it helps:)
under the kansas-nebraska act what area decided to use popular sovereihnty to decide the slavery issue?
The Kansas-Nebraska Act allowed slavery to be legalized in the territories of Kansas and Nebraska (shown in orange).
The territories of Kansas and Nebraska were established by the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 (10 Stat. 277). Democratic Senator Stephen A. Douglas wrote it, the 33rd Congress of the United States approved it, and President Franklin Pierce signed it into law. The Kansas-Nebraska Act is most notable for effectively repealing the Missouri Compromise, stoking national tensions over slavery, and fueling a series of armed conflicts known as "Bleeding Kansas." Douglas originally introduced the bill with the intention of opening up new lands to develop and facilitate the construction of a transcontinental railroad. In the 1803 Louisiana Purchase, the United States gained huge tracts of land. Since the 1840s, Douglas had aimed to create a territorial government in a region of the Louisiana Purchase that was still unorganized. Senator David Rice Atchison and other Southern officials blocked Douglas's attempts by refusing to authorize the establishment of territories that prohibited slavery. Slavery was forbidden by the Missouri Compromise in the region north of latitude 36°30' north, hence Douglas's ambitions were thwarted (except for Missouri).
Learn more about Kansas-Nebraska Act here
https://brainly.com/question/3359357
#SPJ4
The distracted driver of a powerboat struck and seriously injured two water skiers who, at time of the accident, were performing a stunt in which one was on the shoulders of the other. The unrelated skiers, who each suffered damages in excess of $100,000, filed a joint complaint based on negligence in a federal court located in the district in which the accident occurred. One of the skiers was a citizen of the forum state. The driver-defendant and the other skier were citizens of a neighboring state. The forum state has a long-arm statute that permits the exercise of jurisdiction to the extent permissible under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Upon which of the following grounds can the driver most likely successfully move for dismissal of the claim asserted by the skier who is not a citizen of the forum state?
A Improper joinder
B Lack of subject matter jurisdiction
C Lack of personal jurisdiction
D Lack of venue
The correct response is B. Lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The federal district court lacks both diversity and additional jurisdiction over the non-forum skier's claim.
This claim meets the $75,000 threshold for amount in issue, but it does not meet the diversity of citizenship standard because both the defendant and the non-forum skier are residents of the same state. The court does not have diversity jurisdiction over this issue as a result. Even though this claim is based on the same set of relevant facts as the forum-claim, skier's the court is unable to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over it because it does not meet the diversity-of-citizenship criterion. A legal entity's legal authority to administer justice is referred to in law as its jurisdiction. In federations like the United States, there are local, state, and federal levels of jurisdiction. The executive and legislative branches of government have the authority to apply international law, conflict of laws, and other relevant legal theories to allocate resources in the most effective way to suit the needs of society. constitutional law, and other legal frameworks. international scope. In general, international laws and treaties offer commitments that states consent to be obligated to uphold. Such agreements are not usually created or kept up to date. The UN charter outlines three principles for exercising extraterritorial jurisdiction. These three principles are territorial sovereignty, state equality, and non-intervention. This calls into question when many states can establish or enforce jurisdiction.
Learn more about jurisdiction here
https://brainly.com/question/10377896
#SPJ4
A law passed by Congress and the adoption of a regulation by an agency are examples of which of the following? A. Interest groups B. Red tape C. Public policies D. Public opinion
A law passed by Congress and the adoption of a regulation by an agency are examples of Public policies .A system of rules, regulations, options for action, and financial priorities involving a specific subject that have been established by a governmental body or its representatives is known as public policy.
People and organizations frequently make an effort to influence public policy through advocacy, education, or the recruitment of interest groups. In Western-style democracies, public policy is clearly shaped differently from how it is in other systems of government. But it is logical to suppose that competing interest groups would always make an effort to sway policymakers in their direction. Law is a key component of public policy. The term "law" is used generally to refer to both legislative action and more relatively broad constitutional or foreign law principles.
To know more about public policy:
https://brainly.com/question/14616070
#SPJ4
which of the following statements about just-in-time (jit) systems is/are correct? multiple select question. jit is often used to describe lean systems. conversion to jit systems entail some risk. jit systems require minimal coordination and effort. jit systems are demand driven.
Using a just-in-time (JIT) inventory system, a business can get products as soon as feasible before they are actually needed.
What is just-in-time JIT system list out its main benefits?In a just-in-time (JIT) inventory system, products are delivered to a business as close to the time of real need as is feasible. As a result, if an auto assembly factory wants to install airbags, it doesn't have a supply on hand; instead, it gets them as the vehicles pass through the assembly line.
avoidance of overproduction reducing transportation expenses and wait times. reducing resource consumption by streamlining your production processes lowering the amount of money that is invested in shares.
Reduce waste, boost cash flow, increase flexibility, make the most of human resources, and promote team empowerment with just-in-time inventory management. Companies who are adept at JIT inventory management improve profitability by minimizing stock investment. To manage inventory, they employ data.
Therefore, the correct answer are:
JIT systems are demand driven,
JIT is often used to describe Lean systems,
Conversion to JIT systems entail some risk.
To learn more about just-in-time JIT system refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/18805214
#SPJ4
FILL IN THE BLANK there are driver education courses that can get you a ____________. brand new car discount on auto insurance ticket to an amusement park master's degree submit answer
The correct response is b. There are Driver Education courses that can get you a Discount on auto insurance.
In order to protect oneself against financial loss, one party will agree to pay compensation to another in the case of a certain loss, damage, or injury in exchange for a fee. It is a risk management technique that is typically used to guard against the danger of a hypothetical loss that may or may not materialize. Underwriters, insurers, insurance businesses, or carriers are all terms for companies that provide insurance. A person or organization that obtains insurance is known as a policyholder, whereas a person or organization that the policy protects is known as an insured. In a transaction involving insurance, the policyholder consents to pay the insurer (a premium) in exchange for the insurer's promise to provide restitution to the insured in the event of a covered loss by accepting a predictable, manageable, and ensured loss. The loss could be pecuniary or not, but it needs to be quantifiable in terms of money. It also frequently involves property where the insured has an insurable interest based on ownership, possession, or a previous connection.
Learn more about insurance here
https://brainly.com/question/26285319
#SPJ4
under the federal rules, when offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted, a testifying witness's prior inconsistent statement made at a deposition is: responsespress enter or space to submit the answer
responsespress enter or space to submit the answer the witness is subject to cross-examination.
Presented as evidence for the claim's veracity - People frequently trip over this section. The claim must be made in support of the veracity of whatever the speaker was asserting. It is not hearsay if the comment is not presented as proof that what was said is accurate. A past statement that the declarant makes during testimony that is the subject of cross-examination is in conflict with the declarant's testimony and was made under oath during a trial, hearing, other proceeding, or in a deposition. Witness's Earlier Remarks Rule 613. Witness's Earlier Remarks During the Examination, Displaying or Disclosing the Statement A party is not required to provide or reveal a witness' prior statement during cross-examination regarding that statement.
To know more about section refer :
brainly.com/question/30004401
#SPJ4
The Ohio Graduated Driver Licensing Law requires that drivers under the age of 18 years have at least 50 hours of driving practice, 10 of which must be at night. T / F
The given statement "Ohio Graduated Driver Licensing Law requires that drivers under the age of 18 years have at least 50 hours of driving practice, 10 of which must be at night is" True as per the Vehicle Code.
If you are 15 years and 6 months old in Ohio and pass a knowledge and eyesight screening, you can obtain a Temporary Instruction Permit Identification Card (TIPIC).
For an Ohio kid, the TIPIC is simply the start of the licensing process.
There are at least 50 hours required that you'll need to spend in driver's education in Ohio and the skills you'll need to master to pass the driving test.
Driver's education isn't the only prerequisite for acquiring a license, though.
In fact, you should get your Temporary Instruction Permit Identification Card (TIPIC), the learner's permit that enables you to practice driving, before you ever sign up for your driver's ed course.
To know more about driver permit, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/19955137
#SPJ4
The Whitleblower protection law protect employee from reprial for dicloing information that they reaonably believe how what type of evidence?
Employees are shielded from reprisal by the whistleblower protection law if they reveal material they feasibly believe to be proof of misbehavior or unlawful activities.
The Whistleblower Protection Act (WPA) offers protection to Federal employees and job applicants who lawfully reveal information they reasonably believe shows the breaking of a law, rule, or regulation, serious financial mismanagement, serious power abuse, or a significant and specific risk to the public's health or safety. According to the WPA, certain Federal workers are not permitted to take, neglect to take, threaten to take, or take any personnel action against an employee or applicant for employment because the employee or applicant made a protected whistleblowing disclosure.
To know more about Whitleblower protection law click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/3520729#
#SPJ4
The first goal (objective) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA, also called Superfund), is to:- replace Clean Air Act and Clean Water Act when dealing with hazardous waste.- discover those responsible for the contamination and seek payment for the cleanup.- provide financial assistance to companies attempting to clean up hazardous waste sites.- identify sites where contamination of air, soil, and water by hazardous substances has been sufficient to threaten human health or harm the environment.- reduce threats to human health and the environment, usually by cleaning the site.
The federal government has considerable authority under CERCLA to control hazardous substances, respond to releases, and come up with long-term fixes for the most significant problems facing the country.
What does the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation?The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, also known as CERCLA or Superfund, establishes a Federal "Superfund" to clean up unmanaged or abandoned hazardous-waste sites as well as accidents, spills, and other urgent environmental pollution releases.To pay for the costs of clearing up environmentally dangerous regions, the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (Superfund) was established.The Central Government shall have the authority to adopt any and all measures it deems appropriate or necessary for the prevention, control, and mitigation of environmental contamination. This authority shall be subject to the terms of this Act. The President may take action in response to discharges or threatened releases of hazardous materials under Superfund.To learn more about hazardous refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/30088463
#SPJ4
country z is both a producer and an importer of cloth. which of the following will happen if the government of country z imposes a tariff on cloth and the country continues to import some cloth from abroad?
There will be a decrease in domestic producer surplus. The amount of cloth that is required will rise.
Producer surplus is the difference between the price a person would accept for a certain quantity of a good and the price they could get for the good if they sold it at market value. The producer benefits from market sales of the good by receiving the difference or surplus amount.Market pricing above the lowest price producers would normally be ready to pay for their goods result in a producer surplus. The Walras law may be relevant here. Overall economic surplus, which is the advantage brought about by producers and consumers interacting in a free market as opposed to one with price controls or quotas, is the sum of a producer surplus and a consumer surplus.
To know more about law refer :
brainly.com/question/13242861
#SPJ4
TRUE/FALSE. a driver whose vehicle becomes involved in a skid should not attempt to regain control of their vehicle.
False. A driver whose vehicle becomes involved in a skid should attempt to regain control of their vehicle. The easiest way to prevent skids is to slow down beforehand, anticipate lane changes, and accurate motions.
Skids frequently occur on slick surfaces because the lack of steering angle causes the drivers to abruptly lose control of their cars. The safest course of action in these circumstances is to apply harsh control inputs by spinning the vehicle until it completely slows down. Front -wheel skids and rear-wheel skids are the two types of skids. Rear wheel skids-When you press the brakes firmly enough to cause one or more wheels to lock up or when you accelerate quickly enough to spin the drive wheels, you experience a rear-wheel skid. Skids can also happen when you are moving too quickly around a bend or come upon a slippery area. Wheel skids-With a front drive vehicle, forceful braking or acceleration frequently results in front-wheel skids. You won't be able to steer if the front wheels start to slide. Due to their rarity, front-wheel skids might occasionally be viewed as more dangerous.
Learn more about skid here
https://brainly.com/question/19939708
#SPJ4
who comprised the prosecution team in the caylee anthony case
Answer:
The lead prosecutor in the case was Assistant State Attorney Linda Drane Burdick. Assistant State Attorneys Frank George and Jeff Ashton completed the prosecution team. Lead counsel for the defense was Jose Baez, a Florida criminal defense attorney.
Explanation:
Assistant State Attorney Linda Drane Burdick was in charge of the prosecution in this case. The prosecution team was completed by Assistant State Attorneys Frank George and Jeff Ashton.
Jose Baez, a criminal defense lawyer from Florida, served as the defense's principal counsel. Co-counsel included J. Cheney Mason, Dorothy Clay Sims, and Ann Finnell. Mark Lippman, an attorney, represented George and Cindy during the trial.
Assistant State Attorney Linda Drane Burdick was in charge of the prosecution in this case. The prosecution team was completed by Assistant State Attorneys Frank George and Jeff Ashton. Jose Baez, a criminal defense lawyer from Florida, served as the defense's principal counsel. Co-counsel included J. Cheney Mason, Dorothy Clay Sims, and Ann Finnell. Mark Lippman, an attorney, represented George and Cindy during the trial.
Learn more about George, here;
https://brainly.com/question/28828204
#SPJ6
the presumption of innocence have any real effect in criminal cases? if not
The presumption of innocence does not often deal with the removal of the burden of evidence, unlike other presumptions. There isn't actually a burden removed from the defendant. The burden of proof does not shift to the prosecution as a result of the presumption of innocence.
What is the Presumption of Innocence and its Role in the Criminal Process?The concept of "presumption of innocence" is one that is proclaimed in numerous international treaties, and legal systems all over the world have come to understand the significance and crucial role that this presumption plays. However, there is little consensus on its significance and range of applicability. This article examines the broad goals of legal presumptions as well as numerous, occasionally incompatible, interpretations of the most well-known one. Many academics compare it to the need for the prosecution to establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. As such, it has no applicability before to or following a trial and is only an evidentiary rule (although an important one). The essay urges the adoption of a more comprehensive, normative strategy.
To learn more about innocence visit:
https://brainly.com/question/22878354
#SPJ1
A defendant is being tried for the murder of a woman who disappeared 10 years ago and has not been heard from since. Her body has never been found. The prosecutor has presented strong circumstantial evidence that she was murdered by the defendant. To help establish the fact of her death, the prosecutor has requested that the judge give the following instruction, based on a recognized presumption in the jurisdiction: "A person missing and not heard from in the last seven years shall be presumed to be deceased."
Is the instruction proper?
No, because a criminal defendant cannot be subjected to a mandatory pressumption regarding a charged crime's element.
a legal principle that requires judges and courts to draw a specific conclusion from a specific fact or piece of evidence, unless or until the veracity of that conclusion is refuted. According to the U.S. Supreme Court, it is against the law for a judge to teach a jury in a criminal proceeding that a certain aspect of the charged offense must be proven. The statement "must be considered" could be read by the jury as transferring the burden of evidence toward the defendant or as forcing the jury to identify a component of the claimed crime, either of which is not permitted, making the instruction illegal.
To know more about mandatory pressumption:
https://brainly.com/question/25752111
#SPJ4
you can die because an unsafe drug is approved, but you can also die because a safe drug has not yet been approved. this situation is called: please choose the correct answer from the following choices, and then select the submit answer button. answer choices
In relation to the average amount of controlled substance consumed by the registrant, a significant loss can be either a trend of minor losses over time or a single, significant loss.
What is significant loss?Any prescription drug loss that exceeds a reasonable threshold set by comparable parties and necessitates reporting to the board, as well as any loss that is mandated by the DEA or other state or federal agencies for controlled substances and prescription drugs, is referred to as a "significant loss."
A regulated substance must not be taken or used improperly. A significant loss can be a series of minor losses over time or a single, one-time loss that is proportional to the typical amount of controlled substances consumed by the registrant.
Theft or major loss of any controlled substance, disposal container, or listed chemical must be reported in writing to the Field Division Office of the Administration in the registrant's region within one business day, according to federal laws.
Therefore, the answer is drug loss.
To learn more about significant loss refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/11399191
#SPJ4
which of the following are actions practiced by individuals who engage in civic life and public experience?
Answer:
Active communications with representatives and policymakers advocating for one and others' self-interests holding public officials accountable for their actions and decisions accumulation of knowledge about public issues.
Explanation:
Hope it helps:)
FILL IN THE BLANKS. When it comes to lawyers and other professionals, evidence of custom is ________________________________ as evidence to establish the proper standard of care, and such evidence is _________________________.
When it comes to lawyers and other professionals, evidence of custom is standard of care as evidence to establish the proper standard of care, and such evidence is custom.
Acceptable proof A form of evidence that judges let attorneys to present in court is known as admissible evidence. Judges base their decision on relevance, authenticity, and worth. Acceptable evidence is factual, specific to the issue, and has more weight than other factors like bias or shock value. The following are 21 forms of evidence used in jury trials that may have an impact on a case: 1. Acceptable proof A form of evidence that judges let attorneys to present in court is known as admissible evidence. Judges base their decision on relevance, authenticity, and worth. The administration of decisions is thought to be centred on the lawyers of the law.
To know more about decisions refer :
brainly.com/question/29639729
#SPJ4
