The original policymaker believed that everyone should share in the nation's cake equally, regardless of their individual needs or contributions.
What holds true for the second policymaker?The second decision-maker follows the equitable distribution principle, which calls for allocating resources while taking into account the achievements and needs of each individual. Giving everyone their due is making sure that everybody receives what they are supposed to in light of their work and needs, and the third decision-maker upholds this idea.
By engaging in a fruitful discussion, hearing each other out, and seeking common ground, the decision-makers in this scenario can advance the situation.
To know more about policymaker, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30108217
#SPJ1
Rest of the question is,
One thinks a just distribution is sharing the national cake equally, the other thinks a just distribution is rather sharing the national cake fairly, yet the third thinks a just distribution entails giving everyone his due. From our discussions in Unit 2, explain what the reason for their different views could be. Suggest way(s) to make progress in such a scenario.
what happend in war world 1
Answer:
Explanation:
World War I was one of the great watersheds of 20th-century geopolitical history. It led to the fall of four great imperial dynasties (in Germany, Russia, Austria-Hungary, and Turkey ), resulted in the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia, and, in its destabilization of European society, laid the groundwork for World War II.
Answer:
war dude
Explanation: